Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitors Research Articles

Effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in elderly patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Abstract Background More than half of the patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in Japan are over 80 years of age. Both Japanese and European heart failure guidelines recommend the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, there is a paucity of data on the effect of RASIs in elderly patients with HFrEF, because elderly patients have been excluded from large clinical trials. Purpose The purpose of the current study was to clarify the effect of RASIs in elderly patients with HFrEF. Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study that enrolled consecutive patients admitted with ADHF to 19 secondary and tertiary hospitals in Japan between October 2014 and March 2016. Patients who were ≥ 80 years old, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% and discharged alive were included in the present study. RASIs were defined as either ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalisation. Results Among 518 patients enrolled, 288 patients received RASIs at discharge and 230 patients did not. The median follow-up period was 335 days (interquartile range; 124 – 499 days). Patients receiving RASIs were younger (85.7 ± 4.4 vs. 86.5 ± 4.4 years of age, p=0.03), had a higher body mass index (BMI; 21.4 ± 3.3 vs. 20.6 ± 3.7 kg/m², p=0.01) and better renal function (eGFR; 45.4 ± 21.5 vs. 38.2 ± 19.2 ml/min/1.73m², p<0.001). Patients receiving RASIs had a higher LVEF (30.9 ± 6.3 vs. 28.5 ± 7.1%, p<0.001). The use of beta-blockers at discharge was more prevalent in patients receiving RASIs (77.8% vs. 60.4%, p<0.001), but the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was not (50.0% vs. 42.2%, p=0.08). The cumulative incidence of all-cause death or HF hospitalisation one year after discharge was significantly lower in patients receiving RASIs (40.1% vs. 59.5%, p<0.001). Even after adjusting for confounders, the risk of a composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalisation was significantly lower in patients receiving RASIs (adjusted hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.77, p<0.001). There was no interaction between the effect of RASIs and subgroup factors such as age, BMI, dementia, malignancy, frailty, and renal function. Conclusion Use of RASIs at discharge was associated with lower incidence of all-cause death or HF hospitalisation in elderly patients with HFrEF.

Prognostic implications of guideline-directed medical therapy in functional mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background Randomized evidence of the role of heart failure medical therapy for patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is lacking. Purpose The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the independent long-term prognostic impact of the different medical categories recommended in heart failure, for subjects with FMR. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting the association of renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), beta-blockers (BBs), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) with outcomes in FMR. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios [(a)HRs] for all-cause death and the composite outcome in each medical category. Results The final sample comprised 12 studies with 6,715 FMR patients (Picture 1). The use of RASi and BBs was associated with a significantly lower risk for all-cause mortality (HR 0.52 [0.39-0.68]; p <0.00001, I2 =62 % and HR 0.62 [0.49-0.77]; p <0.0001, I2 =44 % respectively) and for the composite outcome (HR 0.54 [0.44-0.67]; p <0.00001, I2 =33 % and HR 0.62 [0.52-0.75], p <0.00001, I2 =35% respectively) in unadjusted models (Picture 2). Both RASi (aHR 0.73 [0.56-0.95], p =0.02, I2 =52%) and BBs (aHR 0.60 [0.41-0.88], p = 0.009, I2 =55%) retained their association with the composite outcome in pooled adjusted models (Picture 2). The prognostic benefit of using RASi or BBs was retained in subgroup analysis including only patients with moderate of severe FMR. MRAs did not demonstrate a significant association with improved outcomes in FMR. Conclusions RASi and BBs appear to have a favorable prognostic impact in patients with FMR, regardless of regurgitation severity.Study flow chart for study selectionPharmacotherapy and prognosis in FMR

Prevalent and incident anemia in PARAGON-HF

Abstract Background Anemia is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with adverse prognosis. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) have been shown to lower hemoglobin levels, potentially related to direct reductions in erythropoetin levels and hematopoiesis. We examined whether sacubitril/valsartan might attenuate this effect of RASi alone on incident anemia in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Methods PARAGON-HF was a global, multicenter randomized clinical trial of sacubitril/valsartan versus the RASi valsartan in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction≥45%. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <120 g/L in women and <130 g/L in men. We evaluated changes in hemoglobin, risks of incident anemia and new oral iron initiation during follow-up. We also assessed treatment effects on the primary composite endpoint of total HF hospitalizations (HFH) and cardiovascular (CV) death according to anemia status. Results Among 4,795 participants with a hemoglobin measurement available, 1,111 (23.2%) had anemia at randomization of which 3.5%, 77.7%, and 18.8% were characterized as micro-, normo-, and macrocytic anemia. 5.6% were treated with oral iron at baseline. Over a 2.7-year median follow-up period, patients with anemia were at nearly twice the risk of the primary outcome (21.6 vs. 11.5 per 100py; rate ratio 1.90; 95% CI: 1.62-2.21; P<0.001). Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan significantly slowed the decline in hemoglobin levels by 1.4 g/L (95% CI: 0.4-2.4 g/L; P = 0.005; Figure 1 Panel A). Participants treated with sacubitril/valsartan were at significantly lower risk of developing anemia (30.3% vs. 37.6%; HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68-0.85; P<0.001; Figure 1 Panel B) and starting oral iron therapy (8.1% vs. 10.0%; HR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.97; P = 0.026; Figure 2). Treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on the primary endpoint were consistent among patients with and without anemia (Pinteraction=1.00). Conclusions Among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan resulted in slower declines in hemoglobin, lower rates of incident anemia, and fewer new initiations of iron therapy compared with RASi.

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on all-cause hospitalizations in heart failure: participant-level pooled analysis of PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF

Abstract Background Sacubitril/valsartan is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with chronic HF. However, many of these patients are older and have multiple comorbidities that increase the risk of hospitalizations other than HF, yet the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on hospitalizations of any cause have not been well described. Methods PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF were phase-3, global multicenter randomized clinical trials that evaluated sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril (in PARADIGM-HF) or valsartan (in PARAGON-HF) across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; ≤40% in PARADIGM-HF and ≥45% in PARAGON-HF). We pooled individual participant-level data from these 2 trials to examine the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on time-to-first investigator-reported all-cause and cause-specific hospitalization using Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by geographic region and trial. We additionally examined heterogeneity in treatment response by LVEF. Results Over 2.8 years median follow-up, among 13,194 participants in the pooled PARADIGM-HF/PARAGON-HF, sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the risk of all-cause hospitalizations compared with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.88-0.97; P=0.002); Figure 1 Panel A. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 2.1 per 100 patient-years corresponding to a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 48 patient-years of treatment exposure to prevent 1 all-cause hospitalization. Reductions in overall hospitalizations among patients with identifiable causes (N=5,783) seemed to be primarily driven by lower rates of cardiac and pulmonary hospitalizations associated with sacubitril/valsartan. Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan did not have a higher rate of composite non-cardiac hospitalizations (Figure 1 Panel B). Similarly, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of the composite of all-cause hospitalization or all-cause mortality (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.96; P<0.001), with an ARR of 2.5 per 100 patients-years and an NNT of 40 patient-years. For all-cause hospitalization, we observed significant heterogeneity by LVEF as a continuous measure (Pinteraction=0.027); treatment effects were most apparent in those with an LVEF below 60% (HR 0.91 95% CI 0.86-0.96; Figure 2). Conclusions In a pooled analysis of >13,000 patients with chronic HF, sacubitril/valsartan reduced hospitalization for any reason with benefits most apparent among those with an LVEF below normal.

Race in heart failure: a pooled participant-level analysis of the global PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials

Abstract Background Mechanisms of disease pathobiology, prognosis, and potentially treatment responses might vary by race in patients with heart failure (HF). Early experiences with neprilysin inhibition suggested possible increased risks of angioedema, especially among Black individuals. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy profile of sacubitril/valsartan in a pooled participant-level dataset of 2 large cohorts of patients with HF by self-reported race. Methods PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF were multicenter, randomized clinical trials testing sacubitril/valsartan against a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi, enalapril or valsartan, respectively) in patients with HF and LVEF ≤40% (PARADIGM-HF) or LVEF ≥45% (PARAGON-HF). We included all patients with available data on self-reported race and categorized patients as White, Asian, or Black. We assessed adjudicated outcomes including the composite of first HF hospitalization (HFH) or cardiovascular (CV) death, its components, and angioedema by racial group. Results Among 12,097 included participants, 9,451 (78.1%) were White, 2,116 (17.5%) were Asian, and 530 (4.4%) were Black. Asian participants were from 19 countries, with highest enrollment from India, China, and the Philippines. Black participants were from 18 countries, with highest enrollment from the US, South Africa, and Brazil. Black patients had the worst baseline health status (adjusted KCCQ-OSS mean 70.3), while White (71.4) and Asian patients (76.4) had better health status; P<0.001. Over 2.4-years of median follow-up, Black (adjusted HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.37-1.89; P<0.001) and Asian patients (adjusted HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.16-1.50; P<0.001) experienced higher risks of the primary outcome compared with White patients (Figure 1). The treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan vs. RASi on the primary endpoint were consistent among White (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.91), Asian (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.78-1.10), and Black patients (HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.58-1.07; Pinteraction = 0.39). In light of higher baseline risks, Black patients accrued the greatest absolute risk reduction with sacubitril/valsartan (Figure 2). Consistent treatment benefits by race were also observed for the individual components (CV death alone and first HFH alone). Rates of any adjudicated angioedema were numerically higher with sacubitril/valsartan vs. RASi across race groups (White 0.4% vs. 0.2%; Asian 0.6% vs. 0.2%; Black 2.3% vs. 0.8%), however no patient in either trial experienced airway compromise or required mechanical airway protection. Conclusions In a pooled experience of over 12,000 participants enrolled in 2 trials conducted across 56 countries, Black and Asian patients exhibited a higher risk of CV events than White patients. Rates of non-serious angioedema were numerically higher with sacubitril/valsartan across race groups. The relative CV benefits of sacubitril/valsartan were consistent across races, with greatest absolute benefits observed in Black patients.

Pregnancy protection in women of child-bearing age prescribed ACE inhibitors, ARBs or statins - A nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Cardiometabolic disorders, including hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia are increasingly prevalent among younger people. Consequently, women of child-bearing age may be prescribed renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and statins. Both angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are known teratogens. Statins are considered possibly teratogenic. In Denmark, ACEIs and ARBs have a ‘Do not use’ recommendation in pregnancy while statins ‘Should not be used’ in pregnancy. Previous studies have reported widespread use of RAS inhibitors without concomitant contraception among women of child-bearing age. This study investigated the situation in Denmark. Purpose To examine prescribing patterns of RAS inhibitors and statins alongside use of concomitant contraception among women of child-bearing age in Denmark. Methods Using nationwide Danish registers, women aged 15–50 years initiating ACEIs, ARBs and statins during 1995–2021 were identified and use of concomitant contraception was evaluated. Contraception was categorized as oral pill, implant, intrauterine device (IUD), or non-use. The duration of protection was assumed to be 1 year for oral contraceptives, 2 years for implants and 4 years for IUDs. Where multiple types of contraceptives were retrieved by individual patients, they were categorized as taking the contraceptive retrieved most recently. Data on non-prescription contraceptives were unavailable, e.g., condoms. Women unable to conceive due to infertility were excluded. Results 79 547 women (median age: 44 years; [interquartile range (IQR): 39–47]) on ACEIs, 64 326 women (median age: 44 years [IQR: 38–48]) on ARBs, and 71 499 women (median age: 45 years [IQR: 40–48]) on statins were included (Figure 1). Correspondingly, 69.1%, 62.8%, and 73.5% were not on contraceptives when starting treatment. Among women prescribed contraception: 70.2%/56.2%/63.1% were on oral contraceptives, 25.3%/30.9%/26.6% had IUDs and 4.5%/12.9%/10.3% had implants, respectively (Figure 1). Younger patients aged 15–29 years were least likely to be unprotected with 41.8%/29.7%/33.4% being unprotected. Among women aged 25 to 35 years the percentage of unprotected women was 51.3%/41.1%/47.7%. Older patients were more likely to have IUDs. Conclusion Substantial numbers of women of child-bearing age were prescribed ACEIs, ARBs and statins from 1995–2021. Most were not prescribed contraceptives. The lack of prescribed pregnancy protection was prevalent even among the youngest women aged 15–29 years and women aged 25 to 35 years, who are the most likely to become pregnant—inferring a potential risk of teratogenic exposure during pregnancy (Figure 2). Subsequent studies should investigate the extent of exposure to ACEIs, ARBs, and statins during pregnancy and the impact of the exposure on pregnancy outcomes.Figure 1 Contraceptive useFigure 2 Study rationale

Use and associations with mortality/morbidity of guideline-directed medical therapy use in heart failure with improved ejection fraction: a PS-matched analysis from the swedish heart failure registry

Abstract Background Guideline-directed medical therapy reduces mortality/morbidity in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, evidence about its use and prognostic role once EF has improved is limited. Purpose To assess use and associations with mortality/morbidity of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), beta-blockers (BBL), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in patients with HF and improved EF (HFimpEF). Methods We analyzed patients with HFimpEF, defined as a first recorded EF <40% and a subsequent EF ≥40%, registered in the Swedish HF registry between 2004 and 2021. Index date was the SwedeHF registration reporting the second (i.e. improved) EF assessment. To reduce the bias related to the initial recommendation for MRA limited to more severe HF (NYHA III-IV), the assessment of MRA was restricted to patients with index date 2016 or later, when Swedish guidelines on HF included a recommendation for MRA in patients with NYHA class II–IV. The association between treatment use and the composite outcome cardiovascular mortality (CVM)/HF hospitalization (HHF) (with censoring >3 years) was assessed by Cox proportional hazard models in a 2:1 propensity score-matched cohort. Propensity scores for treatment use were calculated by a logistic regression model including 38 variables, achieving a standardized mean difference <0.1 for all evaluated variables. Since matching reduces the sample size and may limit generalizability, a Cox proportional hazard model was fitted in the overall cohort adjusting, rather than matching, for the propensity score (Overall HR). Results Of 4700 patients with HFimpEF (mean age 68±12 yrs, 70% male), 94%, 95%, and 50% received RASi/ARNi, BBL, and MRA, respectively. Regardless of the specific treatment, non-users had lower BMI, education level and use of other HF medications, but older age, higher EF at improvement, higher NT-proBNP, and more likely peripheral artery disease, anemia, and valvular disease. In the matched cohorts, RASi/ARNi use was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of CVM/HHF [hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.95] (Figure). There was no statistically significant association between CVM/HHF and beta-blockers (HR 0.75, (95% CI 0.53-1.08), and MRA (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90-1.49). These results were consistent after adjustment for the propensity score in the overall cohort (Figure). Conclusion In patients with HFimpEF use of GDMT was high. Treatment with RASi/ARNi was associated with lower morbidity and mortality, whereas no statistically significant association was observed with beta-blockers which might be explained by limited statistical power.Composite outcome.

Up-titration of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) and the occurrence of side effects in Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

Abstract Background The ESC Guidelines recommend early, full-dose use of heart failure (HF) medications to enhance survival, but real-world application often faces delays and inconsistencies. Clinicians often fear side effects during up-titration to the recommended target dose (TD), i.e. hypotension, bradycardia, renal impairment, and hyperkalemia (HK). The dependency of side effects during dose escalation from the severity of HF remains unclear. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the occurrence of side effects during up-titration of HF medication and HF severity reflected by N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Methods 425 patients with HFrEF and a complete data set of patient characteristics, medications and laboratory values at baseline (BL), 2 months (2M), and 6 months (6M) were included from our outpatient HF unit's prospective registry. Significant side effects were defined as: systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90mmHg, heart rate (HR) <50 beats per minute (bpm), potassium (K) >5.0mmol/l or K >5,5mmol/l and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30ml/min/1.73m2. Patients were categorized into three risk groups based on their NT-proBNP levels, i.e. low-risk with NT-proBNP <1000pg/ml, medium-risk with NT-proBNP 1000-2000pg/ml or high-risk with NT-proBNP >2000pg/ml. The occurrence of side effects was recorded and the development compared among the HF risk groups. Results Figure 1 shows up-titration of HF medication. Mean daily dosages of betablockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi) increased significantly during follow-up (BL vs 2M and BL vs 6M, p<0.001 for all). The majority of patients received ≥50% of the recommended TDs at 6M (89% for BB, 83% for MRA, 88% for RASi and 91% for total mean TDs ≥50%), and the achieved daily dosages at 6M were largely comparable across the HF risk groups at 6M, except for RASi (p=0.030). Figure 2 depicts the side effects. Side effects developed almost exclusively at short-term within 2M except for lower SBP (Figure 2A). Newly developed side effects occurring after up-titration (2B) were even more rare and predominantly occurred within the highest NT-proBNP group. The occurrence of hypotension and bradycardia was infrequent and comparable within the HF risk groups. Renal dysfunction (at 6M p=0,041) and HK occurred predominantly in higher risk patients (HK at 2M p=0,001 and at 6M p<0,001). Conclusions Up-titration of HF medications is highly feasible, particularly in low- and medium-risk patients. Despite rare side effects such as hyperkalemia and renal impairment, up-titration remains unimpeded, especially in patients with NT-proBNP levels below 2000pg/ml. These findings emphasize the safety of up-titration in HF.

Systolic plood pressure response to ASi BI 690517 with and without empagliflozin in CKD

Abstract Background and Aims: BI 690517 is a highly selective aldosterone synthase inhibitor (ASi) in clinical development for CKD treatment. Coadministration of BI 690517 with a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor may provide additive efficacy and also mitigate risk of hyperkalaemia. This multinational, randomised, dose-finding, Phase II trial (NCT05182840) investigated the efficacy and safety of BI 690517, given alone or in combination with empagliflozin (EMPA), for albuminuria reduction in people with CKD and with or without type 2 diabetes.1 Here, we present a secondary analysis for effects on systolic blood pressure (SBP). Method Adults with CKD receiving a maximally tolerated dose of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor were randomised (R1) 1:1 to receive background EMPA 10 mg or placebo (PBO-EMPA) during an 8-week run-in. They were then re-randomised (R2) 1:1:1:1 to receive BI 690517 (3 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg) or PBO-ASI for 14 weeks, in addition to their assigned EMPA or PBO-EMPA therapy. Participants had mean baseline SBP ≥110 and ≤160 mmHg. Elevated blood pressure (BP) was defined as SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg and receiving ≥2 classes of anti-HTN medication. Changes in SBP from R2 baseline to Week 14 were analysed to assess BI 690517 effects with and without EMPA use. Results Of 714 people randomised at R1, 586 were randomised at R2, and the treated set consisted of 583 people. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between dose groups.1 At R2 baseline, 169 (29.0%) people had elevated BP. Mean SBP was 142.7 mmHg in the elevated BP group versus 129.2 mmHg in the non-elevated BP group. Treatment with BI 690517 consistently reduced SBP with reductions that were comparable in people with and without elevated BP (p-value for interaction not significant) (Table). Conclusions In people with CKD, BI 690517 reduced SBP in people with and without elevated BP.(Table)

Temporal trends in sudden cardiac death after acute decompensation in HFrEF patients: a 13-year Japanese multicentre registry study

Abstract Background The implementation of guideline-based medical therapy (GBMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has significantly contributed to reducing mortality risks. Yet, detailed analyses on temporal trends of sudden cardiac death (SCD) among these patients, especially post-discharge following acute decompensation, remain scarce. Purpose This study aimed to explore changes in the incidence of SCD over the last 13 years in patients with HFrEF discharged after acute decompensation treatment, and to identify clinical factors associated with SCD risk. Methods We analyzed 2,604 consecutive HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40%) patients enrolled in a Japanese multicentre acute heart failure (HF) registry from 2009 to 2021. SCD was defined as an unexpected and otherwise unexplained death in a previously stable patient or death due to documented or presumed cardiac arrhythmia without a clear non-cardiovascular cause. The determination of death cause (SCD, pump failure death, or other) was made by a central adjudicating committee. The Fine and Gray method was employed to analyze factors associated with SCD. The variables submitted to the model included age (≥70 years), gender, LVEF (<30%), ischaemic aetiology and prescription of GBMT (use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist) at discharge. Results The mean age of studied patients was 70.9±14.2 years, and 70.0% were male. During the 1-year follow-up period, 262 deaths (10.1%) occurred, including 51 SCDs (2.0%). Older age was associated with an increased risk of SCD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-5.64, P=0.004). Further, patients with an ischaemic aetiology had a higher risk of SCD (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.06-3.22, P=0.032). During the study period, mean age remained constant (71.0 years to 70.7 years, P for trend =0.884). The proportion of ischaemic aetiology also remained constant (from 37.2% to 38.2%, P for trend =0.972). Overall, there were significant decreases in the incidence of all cause death and SCD (from 13.7% to 8.4%, P for trend =0.002; and from 3.5% to 1.0%, P for trend <0.001; Figure A). Notably, there was an increase in the prescription rate of three classes of GBMT at discharge (from 30.9% to 45.6%, P for trend <0.001; Figure B), and the rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use in eligible patients (New York Heart Association functional class II-III with LVEF ≤35%) remained constant (from 9.6% to 11.6%, P for trend =0.157; Figure B). Conclusions With the increasing use of GBMT, the incidence of SCD decreased in real-world patients with HFrEF registered in a Japanese acute HF registry over the past decade.

Renin–angiotensin system inhibition and mortality in patients undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease: insights from a multi-center observational study

ABSTRACT Background While the survival benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are firmly established in the general population, their efficacy within patient undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial. Methods Between January 2015 and June 2021, 1168 patients undergoing dialysis with CAD were assessed from 30 tertiary medical centers. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular death. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to account for between-group differences. Results Overall, ACEI or ARB were prescribed to 518 patients (44.3%) upon discharge. After a median follow-up of 22.2 months, 361 (30.9%) patients died, including 243 cardiovascular deaths. The use of ACEI or ARB was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause (25.3% vs 35.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.82, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (17.0% vs 23.8%; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48–0.83, p = 0.001). These findings remained consistent across IPTW and PSM analyses. Sensitivity analyses for ACEI and ARB use separately yielded similar results. Conclusions Our findings suggested that among patients undergoing dialysis with CAD, ACEI or ARB use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.

Elucidating the complex interplay between chronic kidney disease and hypertension.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension share a complex relationship, each exacerbating the progression of the other. CKD contributes to hypertension by decreasing renal function, leading to fluid retention and increased plasma volume, whereas hypertension exacerbates CKD by increasing glomerular pressure and causing renal damage. This review examines the intertwined nature of CKD and hypertension, exploring the factors driving hypertension in CKD and how hypertension accelerates CKD progression. It discusses the role of the renin-angiotensin system and inflammatory cytokines in this relationship, as well as the potential of blood pressure management to slow renal decline. While studies suggest that meticulous blood pressure control can help attenuate CKD progression, optimal management strategies remain unclear and require further investigation. This review also evaluates the evidence surrounding strict antihypertensive therapy in patients with CKD, considering both diabetic and non-diabetic cases. It recommends blood pressure targets based on CKD stage and presence of diabetes, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment approaches. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are highlighted as a key pharmacological intervention due to their renal protective effects, particularly in patients with CKD with proteinuria. However, evidence regarding their efficacy in patients with CKD but without proteinuria is inconclusive. This review underscores the need for comprehensive approaches to effectively address the intertwined nature of CKD and hypertension and calls for further research to optimize clinical management strategies in this complex interplay.

Association between gastroprotective agents and acute kidney injury in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Analysis of a Japanese hospital-based database.

The concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) potentially increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the risk of AKI has not been comprehensively assessed for the concomitant use of NSAIDs with gastroprotective agents such as misoprostol and PPIs. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of various gastroprotective agents affects the risk of AKI in patients receiving NSAIDs. The data analyzed were obtained from the JMDC hospital-based administrative claims database between April 2014 and August 2022. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) were compared with PPIs or misoprostol in patients receiving NSAIDs. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI. The covariates considered were age and sex, admission to intensive care unit, presence of comorbidities based on the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, loop diuretics, other diuretics, and lithium. AKI was identified by changes in serum creatinine. The distribution of AKI was analyzed using the log-rank test, and estimates of the incidence of AKI were compared among the groups using a Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying variables. Models were adjusted using a doubly robust method that accounts for the inverse probability of treatment weighting at baseline while adjusting for covariates. After screening, 11,688 patients were eligible for inclusion (1729 for H2RAs, 368 for misoprostol, and 9591 for PPIs). AKI occurred in 0.5% of H2RA recipients and 1.1% of PPI recipients; no AKI was observed in the misoprostol group. Compared with H2RAs, the risk of AKI tended to be higher with PPIs (adjusted hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 0.92-3.63, p = 0.08). Compared with H2RAs, PPIs may increase the risk of AKI in patients receiving NSAIDs, although no statistically significant difference was observed. Further research is required to assess the risk trade-off with consideration of both peptic ulcer prevention and the increased risk of AKI in patients concurrently treated with NSAIDs and H2RAs, misoprostol, or PPIs.

Glomerular pressure and tubular oxygen supply: a critical dual target for renal protection.

The primary treatment goal of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is preserving renal function and preventing its progression to end-stage renal disease. Glomerular hypertension and tubular hypoxia are critical risk factors in CKD progression. However, the renal hemodynamics make it difficult to avoid both factors due to the existence of peritubular capillaries that supply oxygen to the renal tubules downstream from the glomerulus through the efferent arteriole. In the treatment strategies for balancing glomerular pressure and tubular oxygen supply, afferent and efferent arterioles of the glomerulus determine glomerular filtration rate and blood flow to the peritubular capillaries. Therefore, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors as well as classical renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, which can change the diameter of afferent and/or efferent arterioles, are promising options for balancing this dual target and achieving renal protection. This review focuses on the clinical importance of glomerular pressure and tubular oxygen supply and proposes an effective treatment modality for this dual target.

Choice Between Free Combination of Antihypertensive Agents and Fixed Dosed Combinations in the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension

Most patients with arterial hypertension require more than one antihypertensive drug for blood pressure target achievement. Some patients are recommended for a multi-pill antihypertensive regimen, others — treatment with fixed dosed combinations in one tablet. Analysis of elibrary and PubMed publications in the period mostly from 2014 to 2024 concerning the choice of two-component combined antihypertensive agents containing renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and diuretic or calcium channel blocker, revealed that fixed-dose combinations (FDC) use and taking one tablet once a day improves adherence to treatment and facilitates blood pressure control. Although the cost of FDC containing the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor and a thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic or calcium channel blocker is in most cases higher than the same drugs taken separately, the use of fixed combinations, increasing patient adherence to therapy, has clinical advantage in terms of the effectiveness of lowering blood pressure, which confirms their economic feasibility. On the other hand, the use of free combination therapy in two different tablets, when taken separately during the day, can sometimes provide a more sustained antihypertensive effect over 24 hours. Evidence of the effectiveness of blood pressure control for FDCs is often extrapolated from data on free combinations. In addition, FDCs are characterized by less detection of possible ineffectiveness of one of the components. The range of FDCs and the dosage ratios of the components presented in them is gradually expanding, but the choice among free combinations is still wider. In addition, the list of vital and essential drugs (VED) for 2024 does not contain FDCs for antihypertensive drugs, which excludes the possibility of free receiving them on a preferential basis and gives the opportunity for the manufacturer to set prices for them. Despite the fact that recently the scientific community has recommended the use of FDC antihypertensive drugs as initial therapy due to better compliance with the regimen, and therefore clinical effectiveness and economic feasibility, it cannot be said that there is no space left for free combinations of antihypertensive drugs in the treatment of arterial hypertension. The choice of doctor, frequency of prescription, share of purchases of the FDCs in the Russian Federation, review of their consumption requires further analysis.

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor for Chronic Kidney Disease: Strategies for Renal Protection.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension are significant global health challenges that often coexist and aggravate each other. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are important to the management of these conditions; however, their efficacy for advanced CKD remains uncertain. Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) have superior efficacy for heart failure (HF) management, as evidenced by landmark trials such as the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF, thus leading to its endorsement by various guidelines. Although direct evidence supporting the renal-protective effects of ARNI is lacking, post hoc analyses have suggested its potential to mitigate the decline of the estimated glomerular filtration rate and renal events, particularly in patients with HF with a relatively preserved ejection fraction. Mechanistically, ARNI augments the glomerular filtration rate by dilating glomerular arterioles, relaxing mesangial cells, and improving renal medullary blood flow, thereby mitigating interstitial fibrosis progression. ARNI also effectively addresses non-dipper hypertension, particularly in salt-sensitive individuals, thereby reducing the cardiovascular risk. Uncertainties regarding the efficacy and safety of ARNI for advanced renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate &lt;30 mL/min) exist. Excessive hypotension associated with ARNI use may exacerbate the renal function decline, especially in older patients with comorbid HF with a reduced ejection fraction. Hence, vigilant blood pressure monitoring is essential to optimizing the renal benefits of ARNI and minimizing adverse effects. Evidence supporting the renal benefits of ARNI continues to evolve; therefore, ARNI could mitigate renal dysfunction in select patient populations. Further research should be performed to clarify the efficacy of ARNI for advanced renal failure and refine its therapeutic application for patients with concurrent HF and renal dysfunction.

Hyperkalemia and maintenance of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy after initiating SGLT-2 or DPP-4 inhibitors.

Post-hoc analyses of clinical trials suggest that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) lower the risk of hyperkalemia and facilitate the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in people with type 2 diabetes. Whether this is also observed in routine care is unclear. We investigated whether SGLT-2i lowered the risk of hyperkalemia and RASi discontinuation as compared to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). Using the target trial emulation framework, we studied adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who started SGLT-2i or DPP-4i in Stockholm, Sweden (2014-2021). The outcomes were incident hyperkalaemia (potassium>5.0 mmol/L), mild hyperkalemia (potassium>5-≤5.5mmol/L) and moderate to severe hyperkalemia (potassium>5.5mmol/L). Among RASi users, we studied time to RASi discontinuation through evaluation of pharmacy fills. Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate per-protocol hazard ratios (HRs). 29 849 individuals (15 326 SGLT-2i and 14 523 DPP-4i initiators) were included (mean age 66 years, 37% women). About one third of participants in each arm discontinued treatment within a year. Compared with DPP-4i, SGLT-2i use was associated with a lower rate of hyperkalemia (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.93), including both mild (0.76; 0.62-0.93) and moderate/severe (0.53; 0.40-0.69) hyperkalemia events. Of 19.116 participants that used RASi at baseline, 7% discontinued therapy. Initiation of SGLT-2i vs. DPP-4i was not associated with the rate of RASi discontinuation (0.97; 0.83-1.14). Results were consistent in intention-to-treat analyses and across strata of age, sex, cardiovascular comorbidity, and baseline kidney function. In patients with diabetes managed in routine clinical care, the use of SGLT-2i was associated with lower rates of hyperkalemia compared with DPP-4i. Possibly because of a relatively high rate of treatment discontinuations, this was not accompanied by higher persistence on RASi therapy.

Heterogeneous afferent arteriolopathy: a key concept for understanding blood pressure-dependent renal damage.

Hypertension, aging, and other factors are associated with arteriosclerosis and arteriolosclerosis, primary morphological features of nephrosclerosis. Although such pathological changes are not invariably linked with renal decline but are prevalent across chronic kidney disease (CKD), understanding kidney damage progression is more pragmatic than precisely diagnosing nephrosclerosis itself. Hyalinosis and medial thickening of the afferent arteriole, along with intimal thickening of small arteries, can disrupt the autoregulatory system, jeopardizing glomerular perfusion pressure given systemic blood pressure (BP) fluctuations. Consequently, such vascular lesions cause glomerular damage by inducing glomerular hypertension and ischemia at the single nephron level. Thus, the interaction between systemic BP and afferent arteriolopathy markedly influences BP-dependent renal damage progression in nephrosclerosis. Both dilated and narrowed types of afferent arteriolopathy coexist throughout the kidney, with varying proportions among patients. Therefore, optimizing antihypertensive therapy to target either glomerular hypertension or ischemia is imperative. In recent years, clinical trials have indicated that combining renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) is superior to using RASis alone in slowing renal function decline, despite comparable reductions in albuminuria. The superior efficacy of SGLT2is may arise from their beneficial effects on both glomerular hypertension and renal ischemia. A comprehensive understanding of the interaction between systemic BP and heterogeneous afferent arteriolopathy is pivotal for optimizing therapy and mitigating renal decline in patients with CKD of any etiology. Therefore, in this comprehensive review, we explore the role of afferent arteriolopathy in BP-dependent renal damage.

The safety of corticosteroid therapy in IGA nephropathy: analysis of a real-life Italian cohort.

Systemic steroids are recommended for patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and proteinuria. However, there are concerns about their safety due to an excess of serious adverse events (SAEs) in previous randomised trials. This study evaluates the incidence of SAEs in IgAN patients receiving different treatment regimens in clinical practice. Multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study of 1209 patients (M/F: 864/345, mean age: 41.73 ± 14.92years) with biopsy-proven IgAN treated with renin angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (RASI) (n = 285), intravenous + oral steroids (n = 633), oral steroids (n = 99), steroids + immunosuppressants (n = 192). A total of 119 (9.8%) adverse events were reported, of which 67 (5.5%) were considered treatment-emergent, and 36 (2.9%) were SAEs (n = 23, 63.8% were infections). One patient died due to sepsis. A significant association was observed between AEs and immunosuppression [8 (2.8%) in RASI, 60 (9.4%) in steroids + immunosuppressants, 14 in oral steroids (14.1%) and 37 pts (19.2%) in steroids + immunosuppressants (p < 0.01)], age and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), but not with proteinuria and sex. On multivariate analysis, only older age was associated with the occurrence of SAEs. According to our findings, the incidence of SAEs during therapy with steroids alone or associated with immunosuppressors is lower in everyday clinical practice than in randomised clinical trials.

Therapeutic opportunities in targeting the protective arm of the renin-angiotensin system to improve insulin sensitivity: a mechanistic review.

In recent years, the knowledge of the physiological and pathophysiological roles of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in glucose metabolism has advanced significantly. It is now well-established that blockade of the angiotensin AT1 receptor (AT1R) improves insulin sensitivity. Activation of the AT2 receptor (AT2R) and the MAS receptor are significant contributors to this beneficial effect. Elevated availability of angiotensin (Ang) II) for interaction with the AT2R and increased Ang-(1-7) formation during AT1R blockade mediate these effects. The ongoing development of selective AT2R agonists, such as compound 21 and the novel Ang III peptidomimetics, has significantly advanced the exploration of the role of AT2R in metabolism and its potential as a therapeutic target. These agents show promise, particularly when RAS inhibition is contraindicated. Additionally, other RAS peptides, including Ang IV, des-Asp-Ang I, Ang-(1-9), and alamandine, hold therapeutic capability for addressing metabolic disturbances linked to type 2 diabetes. The possibility of AT2R heteromerization with either AT1R or MAS receptor offers an exciting area for future research, particularly concerning therapeutic strategies to improve glycemic control. This review focuses on therapeutic opportunities to improve insulin sensitivity, taking advantage of the protective arm of the RAS.