Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitors Research Articles

The potential for improving cardio-renal outcomes in chronic kidney disease with the aldosterone synthase inhibitor vicadrostat (BI 690517): a rationale for the EASi-KIDNEY trial.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at risk of progressive loss of kidney function, heart failure, and cardiovascular death despite current proven therapies, including renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and statin-based regimens. RASi and SGLT2i reduce risk of CKD progression irrespective of primary cause of kidney disease, suggesting they target final common pathways. Targeting aldosterone overactivity with a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) also reduces cardiorenal risk in patients with albuminuric diabetic kidney disease already treated with RASi. Together, these observations provide the rationale for trials to assess effects of inhibiting the aldosterone pathway in a broader range of patients with CKD, including those with non-diabetic causes of CKD or low albuminuria. Aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASi) have emerged as an alternative to MRAs for aldosterone pathway inhibition. Phase II data from 586 patients with albuminuric CKD have shown that 10 mg of an ASi, vicadrostat (BI 690517), reduced urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio by ∼40% compared to placebo with or without concurrent empagliflozin treatment. MRA and ASi increase risk of hyperkalaemia. Combining their use with an SGLT2i may mitigate some of this risk, improving tolerability, and allowing a wider range of patients to be treated (including those with higher levels of blood potassium than in previous trials). The EASi-KIDNEY (NCT06531824) double-blind placebo-controlled trial will test this approach by assessing the safety and cardiorenal efficacy of vicadrostat in combination with empagliflozin in ∼11,000 patients with CKD. It will be sufficiently large to assess effects in patients with and without diabetes separately.

Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure.

Fewer than 20% of eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receive all 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy. Understanding disparities by race, ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health is necessary to equitably optimize quadruple therapy. Utilizing the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry, we examined associations between race and ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health (insurance type and documented social need [any barrier to accessing health care]) with quadruple therapy optimization (QTO) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction hospitalized between July 1, 2021, and September 30, 2023, with complete medication data at discharge. We calculated adjusted mean differences (AMDs) in the discharge QTO score (range, 0%-100%) reflecting the proportion of eligible use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and compared across demographic and adverse social determinants of health groups. Among 82 637 patients (median age, 66 years; 32.5% female; 57.0% non-Hispanic White; 76.4% prior heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), the overall mean QTO score was 56.2% (SD, 25.5). After adjustment, compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, Black (AMD, 2.56 percentage points [95% CI, 2.16-2.96]) and Hispanic individuals (AMD, 0.71 percentage points [95% CI, 0.11-1.31]) had higher QTO scores. Females had higher QTO scores than males (AMD, 1.94 percentage points [95% CI, 1.58-2.31]). Patients with no insurance (AMD, -4.90 percentage points [-5.62 to -4.17]), Medicaid (AMD, -0.45 percentage points [-0.89 to -0.01]), and Medicare (AMD, -1.64 percentage points [-2.10 to -1.18]) had lower QTO scores versus private insurance. Those with an identified social need (n=24 651) had lower QTO scores than those without (AMD, -3.40 percentage points [95% CI, -4.10 to -2.71]). Disparities in QTO were most evident for patients with no insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, or potentially an identified social need. Future efforts should focus on reducing gaps to improve equitable guideline-directed medical therapy use.

Nephroprotective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a real-world population-based cohort study

ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to investigate the nephroprotective effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension based on real-world clinical data. The study aimed to provide a theoretical basis for evidence-based pharmacological treatment of chronic kidney disease in this population. Methods The ‘Health Cloud’ platform of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission was employed to identify and screen elderly patients with T2DM and hypertension. The propensity score matching cohort was further constructed to estimate the effect of SGLT2i on the risk of rapid decline in renal function (∆eGFR≤-5 ml/min/1.73 m2 or ∆eGFR%≤-5%). Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Results After propensity score matching, no significant differences of covariates were identified between the SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i groups. The results of multivariate logistic models demonstrated a consistent and inverse correlation between SGLT2i use and the risk of rapid eGFR decline, whether defined as ∆eGFR≤-5 ml/min/1.73 m2 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI:0.38-0.96) or ∆eGFR%≤-5%（OR = 0.57, 95% CI:0.37-0.89). In the stratification of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) treatment, SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of rapid eGFR decline in the RASi group (all ORs < 1, p < 0.05), with no interaction between SGLT2i and RASi (all P for interaction > 0.05) detected. Conclusions SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of rapid eGFR decline in elderly patients with T2DM and hypertension, but the synergistic effect with RASi remains unclear.

Calcium Channel Blocker Versus Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitor in Risk of Kidney Cancer Among Patients With Hypertension: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Use of antihypertensive medications could be associated with an increased risk of kidney cancer. Despite their various mechanisms of action, whether this association differs between different classes of medications remains unclear. The objective of this study is to compare the risk of kidney cancer between first-line treatment options of antihypertensive medications in a hypertensive population. In this retrospective cohort study, we used the MarketScan Databases (2007-2021). We included individuals older than 30 years of age with a diagnosis of hypertension who received first-line medications for hypertension, which included three classes: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (dCCB). We applied a propensity score matching method and created three separate cohorts: (1) ARB versus ACEI, (2) dCCB versus ACEI, and (3) dCCB versus ACEI. For non-dCCB, we repeated the analyses. The primary outcome was kidney cancer incidence. To assess kidney cancer risk, we applied multivariable conditional Cox proportional hazards models. In the first cohort, ARB use was associated with an increased risk of kidney cancer compared to ACEI use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.18). In the second cohort, dCCB use was associated with an increased risk of kidney cancer compared to ACEI use (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18-1.40). In the third cohort, dCCB use was associated with a higher risk of kidney cancer compared to ARB use (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.28). Null association was shown when comparing non-dCCB with ACEI or ARB use. Use of dCCB showed a higher risk of kidney cancer compared to ACEI or ARB use in patients with hypertension.

Impact of Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on response to PD1/L1 inhibitors in patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundThe renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), traditionally associated with blood pressure and fluid regulation, also plays a role in tumorigenesis. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASI), including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), have been shown to improve outcomes in various malignant neoplasms. In metastatic urothelial cancer, the use of RAASI have been associated with higher rates of tumor regression in patients receiving immunotherapy (IO) with PD1/L1 inhibitors. This is thought to be due to RAASI-induced downregulation of TGF-beta, for which increased expression is a known mechanism of PD1/L1 inhibitor resistance. We hypothesized that concurrent RAASI in patients with mRCC receiving IO is associated with increased tumor regression. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC receiving IO as a first- or second-line therapy from 2016-2023 at the University of Virginia. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the impact of concurrent RAASI on tumor regression. The primary endpoint was any regression of tumor on imaging. ResultsData were available for 128 patients with mRCC who received IO as a first- (n=91, 71.0%) or second- (n=37, 28.9%) line treatment. Patients who received RAASI during IO were more likely to have tumor regression compared to patients who were not on concurrent RAASI (OR 3.84 [95% CI 1.81-8.47, p=<0.001). This held true regardless if patients received IO as a first-line (OR 2.83 [95% CI 1.2-6.94], p=0.0173) or second-line (OR 9.5 [95% CI 1.89-73.1], p=0.005) treatment. ConclusionsOur hypothesis generating study suggests that in our mRCC population, concurrent use of RAASI in patients receiving IO was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of tumor regression. These findings highlight the potential therapeutic advantage of RAASI in combination with IO for mRCC patients. Further exploration of this association is warranted in prospective studies to improve treatment outcomes for this patient population. MicroAbstractRenin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASI) have been shown to improve outcomes in various malignancies. In this retrospective, single-center study, we found that concurrent use of RAASI in patients with mRCC receiving IO is associated with a significantly increased likelihood of tumor regression. Our findings suggest the potential therapeutic advantage of RAASI in combination with IO for mRCC patients.

Risk of developing hyperkalemia in patients with hypertension treated with combination antihypertensive therapy - a retrospective register-based study.

The risk of hyperkalemia in relation to different combinations of antihypertensive therapy remains to be elucidated. In this Danish register-based study, we aimed to investigate the risk of developing hyperkalemia in relation to different combinations of antihypertensive therapy. Using incidence density matching, we matched a hyperkalemic patient to five normokalemic patients on eGFR groups, age, sex, and time between study entry and date of potassium measurement. Combination therapies were subdivided into eight groups: beta blockers (BB) + calcium channel blockers (CCB), BB + renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), BB + RASi + mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), CCB + RASi, CCB + RASi + thiazides, CCB + thiazides, RASi + thiazides, and other combinations. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of hyperkalemia within 90 days for each of the eight antihypertensive combination therapies. A total of 793 patients with hyperkalemia were matched to 3598 normokalemic patients. In multivariable analysis, odds of developing hyperkalemia when being treated with BB + RASi + MRA was 1.95 (95% CI, 1.39-2.72) compared to RASi + thiazides (reference). CCB + thiazides (OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.45-1.28]) and CCB + RASi + Thiazid (OR 0.81 [95% CI, 0.51-1.28]) were among the others not significantly associated with hyperkalemia. Combinations of BB + RASi + MRA were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing hyperkalemia within 90 days of initiating treatment. Patients treated with BB + RASi + MRA within 90 days of treatment initiation, were associated with an increased hyperkalemia risk. When treating hypertensive patients with combination antihypertensive therapy, identifying and monitoring patients with a high risk of dyskalemias is a crucial goal to avoid serious adverse effects and detrimental outcomes related to dyskalemia.

Relationship between clinical congestion and worsening renal function after intravenous initiation of furosemide in patients with acute heart failure.

To investigate if worsening renal function (WRF) appearing in some patients with acute heart failure (AHF) after intravenous furosemide initiation is influenced by severity of congestion. We conducted a retrospective secondary analysis of consecutive patients diagnosed with AHF and prospectively included in 10 Spanish emergency departments (EDs) for whom serum creatinine at ED arrival and after 2-7days of intravenous furosemide initiation were available. Congestion was clinically evaluated by identification of 7 signs/symptoms and by chest X-ray. The outcome was WRF, defined as a delta-creatinine ≥ 0.3mg/dL. Risk of WRF according to congestion was estimated in models adjusted by patient baseline characteristics and vitals at ED arrival, and interaction was also investigated. We included 3027 patients (median age 82years, 56% women), and 657 (21.7%) presented WRF after intravenous furosemide initiation. When signs/symptoms were individually considered, only lower limbs edema was associated with decreased risk of WRF (20.1% vs. 24.8%; OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.64-0.91). After adjustment, lower limbs edema persisted inversely associated with WRF (aOR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.65-0.94), with significant lower risk for patients ≤ 80years and without chronic kidney disease, functional limitation, and hypoxemia (p for interaction 0.01, 0.04, 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). Neither degree of clinical congestion (number of signs/symptoms of congestion) nor radiological congestion in chest X-ray were related to WRF. Worsening renal function was associated with a higher 1-year all-cause mortality (40.1% vs 34.6%; HR = 1.27, 1.10-1.46; aHR = 1.331, 1.151-1.540). In patients with WRF, liver cirrhosis, chronic treatment with loop diuretics and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, age (> 80years), dementia, heart valve disease and NYHA class III-IV were associated with higher mortality. Intravenous furosemide initiation in patients with AHF without lower limbs edema must be cautious, as they are at increasing risk of developing WRF during the next following days, which in turn is associated with a higher 1-year mortality.

Effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in elderly patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Abstract Background More than half of the patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in Japan are over 80 years of age. Both Japanese and European heart failure guidelines recommend the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, there is a paucity of data on the effect of RASIs in elderly patients with HFrEF, because elderly patients have been excluded from large clinical trials. Purpose The purpose of the current study was to clarify the effect of RASIs in elderly patients with HFrEF. Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study that enrolled consecutive patients admitted with ADHF to 19 secondary and tertiary hospitals in Japan between October 2014 and March 2016. Patients who were ≥ 80 years old, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &amp;lt; 40% and discharged alive were included in the present study. RASIs were defined as either ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalisation. Results Among 518 patients enrolled, 288 patients received RASIs at discharge and 230 patients did not. The median follow-up period was 335 days (interquartile range; 124 – 499 days). Patients receiving RASIs were younger (85.7 ± 4.4 vs. 86.5 ± 4.4 years of age, p=0.03), had a higher body mass index (BMI; 21.4 ± 3.3 vs. 20.6 ± 3.7 kg/m², p=0.01) and better renal function (eGFR; 45.4 ± 21.5 vs. 38.2 ± 19.2 ml/min/1.73m², p&amp;lt;0.001). Patients receiving RASIs had a higher LVEF (30.9 ± 6.3 vs. 28.5 ± 7.1%, p&amp;lt;0.001). The use of beta-blockers at discharge was more prevalent in patients receiving RASIs (77.8% vs. 60.4%, p&amp;lt;0.001), but the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was not (50.0% vs. 42.2%, p=0.08). The cumulative incidence of all-cause death or HF hospitalisation one year after discharge was significantly lower in patients receiving RASIs (40.1% vs. 59.5%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Even after adjusting for confounders, the risk of a composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalisation was significantly lower in patients receiving RASIs (adjusted hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.77, p&amp;lt;0.001). There was no interaction between the effect of RASIs and subgroup factors such as age, BMI, dementia, malignancy, frailty, and renal function. Conclusion Use of RASIs at discharge was associated with lower incidence of all-cause death or HF hospitalisation in elderly patients with HFrEF.

Prognostic implications of guideline-directed medical therapy in functional mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background Randomized evidence of the role of heart failure medical therapy for patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is lacking. Purpose The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the independent long-term prognostic impact of the different medical categories recommended in heart failure, for subjects with FMR. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting the association of renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), beta-blockers (BBs), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) with outcomes in FMR. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios [(a)HRs] for all-cause death and the composite outcome in each medical category. Results The final sample comprised 12 studies with 6,715 FMR patients (Picture 1). The use of RASi and BBs was associated with a significantly lower risk for all-cause mortality (HR 0.52 [0.39-0.68]; p &amp;lt;0.00001, I2 =62 % and HR 0.62 [0.49-0.77]; p &amp;lt;0.0001, I2 =44 % respectively) and for the composite outcome (HR 0.54 [0.44-0.67]; p &amp;lt;0.00001, I2 =33 % and HR 0.62 [0.52-0.75], p &amp;lt;0.00001, I2 =35% respectively) in unadjusted models (Picture 2). Both RASi (aHR 0.73 [0.56-0.95], p =0.02, I2 =52%) and BBs (aHR 0.60 [0.41-0.88], p = 0.009, I2 =55%) retained their association with the composite outcome in pooled adjusted models (Picture 2). The prognostic benefit of using RASi or BBs was retained in subgroup analysis including only patients with moderate of severe FMR. MRAs did not demonstrate a significant association with improved outcomes in FMR. Conclusions RASi and BBs appear to have a favorable prognostic impact in patients with FMR, regardless of regurgitation severity.Study flow chart for study selectionPharmacotherapy and prognosis in FMR

Prevalent and incident anemia in PARAGON-HF

Abstract Background Anemia is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with adverse prognosis. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) have been shown to lower hemoglobin levels, potentially related to direct reductions in erythropoetin levels and hematopoiesis. We examined whether sacubitril/valsartan might attenuate this effect of RASi alone on incident anemia in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Methods PARAGON-HF was a global, multicenter randomized clinical trial of sacubitril/valsartan versus the RASi valsartan in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction≥45%. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin &amp;lt;120 g/L in women and &amp;lt;130 g/L in men. We evaluated changes in hemoglobin, risks of incident anemia and new oral iron initiation during follow-up. We also assessed treatment effects on the primary composite endpoint of total HF hospitalizations (HFH) and cardiovascular (CV) death according to anemia status. Results Among 4,795 participants with a hemoglobin measurement available, 1,111 (23.2%) had anemia at randomization of which 3.5%, 77.7%, and 18.8% were characterized as micro-, normo-, and macrocytic anemia. 5.6% were treated with oral iron at baseline. Over a 2.7-year median follow-up period, patients with anemia were at nearly twice the risk of the primary outcome (21.6 vs. 11.5 per 100py; rate ratio 1.90; 95% CI: 1.62-2.21; P&amp;lt;0.001). Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan significantly slowed the decline in hemoglobin levels by 1.4 g/L (95% CI: 0.4-2.4 g/L; P = 0.005; Figure 1 Panel A). Participants treated with sacubitril/valsartan were at significantly lower risk of developing anemia (30.3% vs. 37.6%; HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68-0.85; P&amp;lt;0.001; Figure 1 Panel B) and starting oral iron therapy (8.1% vs. 10.0%; HR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.97; P = 0.026; Figure 2). Treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan on the primary endpoint were consistent among patients with and without anemia (Pinteraction=1.00). Conclusions Among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan resulted in slower declines in hemoglobin, lower rates of incident anemia, and fewer new initiations of iron therapy compared with RASi.

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on all-cause hospitalizations in heart failure: participant-level pooled analysis of PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF

Abstract Background Sacubitril/valsartan is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with chronic HF. However, many of these patients are older and have multiple comorbidities that increase the risk of hospitalizations other than HF, yet the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on hospitalizations of any cause have not been well described. Methods PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF were phase-3, global multicenter randomized clinical trials that evaluated sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril (in PARADIGM-HF) or valsartan (in PARAGON-HF) across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; ≤40% in PARADIGM-HF and ≥45% in PARAGON-HF). We pooled individual participant-level data from these 2 trials to examine the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on time-to-first investigator-reported all-cause and cause-specific hospitalization using Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by geographic region and trial. We additionally examined heterogeneity in treatment response by LVEF. Results Over 2.8 years median follow-up, among 13,194 participants in the pooled PARADIGM-HF/PARAGON-HF, sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the risk of all-cause hospitalizations compared with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.88-0.97; P=0.002); Figure 1 Panel A. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 2.1 per 100 patient-years corresponding to a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 48 patient-years of treatment exposure to prevent 1 all-cause hospitalization. Reductions in overall hospitalizations among patients with identifiable causes (N=5,783) seemed to be primarily driven by lower rates of cardiac and pulmonary hospitalizations associated with sacubitril/valsartan. Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan did not have a higher rate of composite non-cardiac hospitalizations (Figure 1 Panel B). Similarly, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of the composite of all-cause hospitalization or all-cause mortality (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.96; P&amp;lt;0.001), with an ARR of 2.5 per 100 patients-years and an NNT of 40 patient-years. For all-cause hospitalization, we observed significant heterogeneity by LVEF as a continuous measure (Pinteraction=0.027); treatment effects were most apparent in those with an LVEF below 60% (HR 0.91 95% CI 0.86-0.96; Figure 2). Conclusions In a pooled analysis of &amp;gt;13,000 patients with chronic HF, sacubitril/valsartan reduced hospitalization for any reason with benefits most apparent among those with an LVEF below normal.

Race in heart failure: a pooled participant-level analysis of the global PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials

Abstract Background Mechanisms of disease pathobiology, prognosis, and potentially treatment responses might vary by race in patients with heart failure (HF). Early experiences with neprilysin inhibition suggested possible increased risks of angioedema, especially among Black individuals. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy profile of sacubitril/valsartan in a pooled participant-level dataset of 2 large cohorts of patients with HF by self-reported race. Methods PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF were multicenter, randomized clinical trials testing sacubitril/valsartan against a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi, enalapril or valsartan, respectively) in patients with HF and LVEF ≤40% (PARADIGM-HF) or LVEF ≥45% (PARAGON-HF). We included all patients with available data on self-reported race and categorized patients as White, Asian, or Black. We assessed adjudicated outcomes including the composite of first HF hospitalization (HFH) or cardiovascular (CV) death, its components, and angioedema by racial group. Results Among 12,097 included participants, 9,451 (78.1%) were White, 2,116 (17.5%) were Asian, and 530 (4.4%) were Black. Asian participants were from 19 countries, with highest enrollment from India, China, and the Philippines. Black participants were from 18 countries, with highest enrollment from the US, South Africa, and Brazil. Black patients had the worst baseline health status (adjusted KCCQ-OSS mean 70.3), while White (71.4) and Asian patients (76.4) had better health status; P&amp;lt;0.001. Over 2.4-years of median follow-up, Black (adjusted HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.37-1.89; P&amp;lt;0.001) and Asian patients (adjusted HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.16-1.50; P&amp;lt;0.001) experienced higher risks of the primary outcome compared with White patients (Figure 1). The treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan vs. RASi on the primary endpoint were consistent among White (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.91), Asian (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.78-1.10), and Black patients (HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.58-1.07; Pinteraction = 0.39). In light of higher baseline risks, Black patients accrued the greatest absolute risk reduction with sacubitril/valsartan (Figure 2). Consistent treatment benefits by race were also observed for the individual components (CV death alone and first HFH alone). Rates of any adjudicated angioedema were numerically higher with sacubitril/valsartan vs. RASi across race groups (White 0.4% vs. 0.2%; Asian 0.6% vs. 0.2%; Black 2.3% vs. 0.8%), however no patient in either trial experienced airway compromise or required mechanical airway protection. Conclusions In a pooled experience of over 12,000 participants enrolled in 2 trials conducted across 56 countries, Black and Asian patients exhibited a higher risk of CV events than White patients. Rates of non-serious angioedema were numerically higher with sacubitril/valsartan across race groups. The relative CV benefits of sacubitril/valsartan were consistent across races, with greatest absolute benefits observed in Black patients.

Pregnancy protection in women of child-bearing age prescribed ACE inhibitors, ARBs or statins - A nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Cardiometabolic disorders, including hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia are increasingly prevalent among younger people. Consequently, women of child-bearing age may be prescribed renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and statins. Both angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are known teratogens. Statins are considered possibly teratogenic. In Denmark, ACEIs and ARBs have a ‘Do not use’ recommendation in pregnancy while statins ‘Should not be used’ in pregnancy. Previous studies have reported widespread use of RAS inhibitors without concomitant contraception among women of child-bearing age. This study investigated the situation in Denmark. Purpose To examine prescribing patterns of RAS inhibitors and statins alongside use of concomitant contraception among women of child-bearing age in Denmark. Methods Using nationwide Danish registers, women aged 15–50 years initiating ACEIs, ARBs and statins during 1995–2021 were identified and use of concomitant contraception was evaluated. Contraception was categorized as oral pill, implant, intrauterine device (IUD), or non-use. The duration of protection was assumed to be 1 year for oral contraceptives, 2 years for implants and 4 years for IUDs. Where multiple types of contraceptives were retrieved by individual patients, they were categorized as taking the contraceptive retrieved most recently. Data on non-prescription contraceptives were unavailable, e.g., condoms. Women unable to conceive due to infertility were excluded. Results 79 547 women (median age: 44 years; [interquartile range (IQR): 39–47]) on ACEIs, 64 326 women (median age: 44 years [IQR: 38–48]) on ARBs, and 71 499 women (median age: 45 years [IQR: 40–48]) on statins were included (Figure 1). Correspondingly, 69.1%, 62.8%, and 73.5% were not on contraceptives when starting treatment. Among women prescribed contraception: 70.2%/56.2%/63.1% were on oral contraceptives, 25.3%/30.9%/26.6% had IUDs and 4.5%/12.9%/10.3% had implants, respectively (Figure 1). Younger patients aged 15–29 years were least likely to be unprotected with 41.8%/29.7%/33.4% being unprotected. Among women aged 25 to 35 years the percentage of unprotected women was 51.3%/41.1%/47.7%. Older patients were more likely to have IUDs. Conclusion Substantial numbers of women of child-bearing age were prescribed ACEIs, ARBs and statins from 1995–2021. Most were not prescribed contraceptives. The lack of prescribed pregnancy protection was prevalent even among the youngest women aged 15–29 years and women aged 25 to 35 years, who are the most likely to become pregnant—inferring a potential risk of teratogenic exposure during pregnancy (Figure 2). Subsequent studies should investigate the extent of exposure to ACEIs, ARBs, and statins during pregnancy and the impact of the exposure on pregnancy outcomes.Figure 1 Contraceptive useFigure 2 Study rationale

Use and associations with mortality/morbidity of guideline-directed medical therapy use in heart failure with improved ejection fraction: a PS-matched analysis from the swedish heart failure registry

Abstract Background Guideline-directed medical therapy reduces mortality/morbidity in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, evidence about its use and prognostic role once EF has improved is limited. Purpose To assess use and associations with mortality/morbidity of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), beta-blockers (BBL), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in patients with HF and improved EF (HFimpEF). Methods We analyzed patients with HFimpEF, defined as a first recorded EF &amp;lt;40% and a subsequent EF ≥40%, registered in the Swedish HF registry between 2004 and 2021. Index date was the SwedeHF registration reporting the second (i.e. improved) EF assessment. To reduce the bias related to the initial recommendation for MRA limited to more severe HF (NYHA III-IV), the assessment of MRA was restricted to patients with index date 2016 or later, when Swedish guidelines on HF included a recommendation for MRA in patients with NYHA class II–IV. The association between treatment use and the composite outcome cardiovascular mortality (CVM)/HF hospitalization (HHF) (with censoring &amp;gt;3 years) was assessed by Cox proportional hazard models in a 2:1 propensity score-matched cohort. Propensity scores for treatment use were calculated by a logistic regression model including 38 variables, achieving a standardized mean difference &amp;lt;0.1 for all evaluated variables. Since matching reduces the sample size and may limit generalizability, a Cox proportional hazard model was fitted in the overall cohort adjusting, rather than matching, for the propensity score (Overall HR). Results Of 4700 patients with HFimpEF (mean age 68±12 yrs, 70% male), 94%, 95%, and 50% received RASi/ARNi, BBL, and MRA, respectively. Regardless of the specific treatment, non-users had lower BMI, education level and use of other HF medications, but older age, higher EF at improvement, higher NT-proBNP, and more likely peripheral artery disease, anemia, and valvular disease. In the matched cohorts, RASi/ARNi use was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of CVM/HHF [hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.95] (Figure). There was no statistically significant association between CVM/HHF and beta-blockers (HR 0.75, (95% CI 0.53-1.08), and MRA (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90-1.49). These results were consistent after adjustment for the propensity score in the overall cohort (Figure). Conclusion In patients with HFimpEF use of GDMT was high. Treatment with RASi/ARNi was associated with lower morbidity and mortality, whereas no statistically significant association was observed with beta-blockers which might be explained by limited statistical power.Composite outcome.

Up-titration of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) and the occurrence of side effects in Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

Abstract Background The ESC Guidelines recommend early, full-dose use of heart failure (HF) medications to enhance survival, but real-world application often faces delays and inconsistencies. Clinicians often fear side effects during up-titration to the recommended target dose (TD), i.e. hypotension, bradycardia, renal impairment, and hyperkalemia (HK). The dependency of side effects during dose escalation from the severity of HF remains unclear. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the occurrence of side effects during up-titration of HF medication and HF severity reflected by N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Methods 425 patients with HFrEF and a complete data set of patient characteristics, medications and laboratory values at baseline (BL), 2 months (2M), and 6 months (6M) were included from our outpatient HF unit's prospective registry. Significant side effects were defined as: systolic blood pressure (SBP) &amp;lt;90mmHg, heart rate (HR) &amp;lt;50 beats per minute (bpm), potassium (K) &amp;gt;5.0mmol/l or K &amp;gt;5,5mmol/l and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &amp;lt;30ml/min/1.73m2. Patients were categorized into three risk groups based on their NT-proBNP levels, i.e. low-risk with NT-proBNP &amp;lt;1000pg/ml, medium-risk with NT-proBNP 1000-2000pg/ml or high-risk with NT-proBNP &amp;gt;2000pg/ml. The occurrence of side effects was recorded and the development compared among the HF risk groups. Results Figure 1 shows up-titration of HF medication. Mean daily dosages of betablockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi) increased significantly during follow-up (BL vs 2M and BL vs 6M, p&amp;lt;0.001 for all). The majority of patients received ≥50% of the recommended TDs at 6M (89% for BB, 83% for MRA, 88% for RASi and 91% for total mean TDs ≥50%), and the achieved daily dosages at 6M were largely comparable across the HF risk groups at 6M, except for RASi (p=0.030). Figure 2 depicts the side effects. Side effects developed almost exclusively at short-term within 2M except for lower SBP (Figure 2A). Newly developed side effects occurring after up-titration (2B) were even more rare and predominantly occurred within the highest NT-proBNP group. The occurrence of hypotension and bradycardia was infrequent and comparable within the HF risk groups. Renal dysfunction (at 6M p=0,041) and HK occurred predominantly in higher risk patients (HK at 2M p=0,001 and at 6M p&amp;lt;0,001). Conclusions Up-titration of HF medications is highly feasible, particularly in low- and medium-risk patients. Despite rare side effects such as hyperkalemia and renal impairment, up-titration remains unimpeded, especially in patients with NT-proBNP levels below 2000pg/ml. These findings emphasize the safety of up-titration in HF.

Systolic plood pressure response to ASi BI 690517 with and without empagliflozin in CKD

Abstract Background and Aims: BI 690517 is a highly selective aldosterone synthase inhibitor (ASi) in clinical development for CKD treatment. Coadministration of BI 690517 with a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor may provide additive efficacy and also mitigate risk of hyperkalaemia. This multinational, randomised, dose-finding, Phase II trial (NCT05182840) investigated the efficacy and safety of BI 690517, given alone or in combination with empagliflozin (EMPA), for albuminuria reduction in people with CKD and with or without type 2 diabetes.1 Here, we present a secondary analysis for effects on systolic blood pressure (SBP). Method Adults with CKD receiving a maximally tolerated dose of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor were randomised (R1) 1:1 to receive background EMPA 10 mg or placebo (PBO-EMPA) during an 8-week run-in. They were then re-randomised (R2) 1:1:1:1 to receive BI 690517 (3 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg) or PBO-ASI for 14 weeks, in addition to their assigned EMPA or PBO-EMPA therapy. Participants had mean baseline SBP ≥110 and ≤160 mmHg. Elevated blood pressure (BP) was defined as SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg and receiving ≥2 classes of anti-HTN medication. Changes in SBP from R2 baseline to Week 14 were analysed to assess BI 690517 effects with and without EMPA use. Results Of 714 people randomised at R1, 586 were randomised at R2, and the treated set consisted of 583 people. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between dose groups.1 At R2 baseline, 169 (29.0%) people had elevated BP. Mean SBP was 142.7 mmHg in the elevated BP group versus 129.2 mmHg in the non-elevated BP group. Treatment with BI 690517 consistently reduced SBP with reductions that were comparable in people with and without elevated BP (p-value for interaction not significant) (Table). Conclusions In people with CKD, BI 690517 reduced SBP in people with and without elevated BP.(Table)

Temporal trends in sudden cardiac death after acute decompensation in HFrEF patients: a 13-year Japanese multicentre registry study

Abstract Background The implementation of guideline-based medical therapy (GBMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has significantly contributed to reducing mortality risks. Yet, detailed analyses on temporal trends of sudden cardiac death (SCD) among these patients, especially post-discharge following acute decompensation, remain scarce. Purpose This study aimed to explore changes in the incidence of SCD over the last 13 years in patients with HFrEF discharged after acute decompensation treatment, and to identify clinical factors associated with SCD risk. Methods We analyzed 2,604 consecutive HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40%) patients enrolled in a Japanese multicentre acute heart failure (HF) registry from 2009 to 2021. SCD was defined as an unexpected and otherwise unexplained death in a previously stable patient or death due to documented or presumed cardiac arrhythmia without a clear non-cardiovascular cause. The determination of death cause (SCD, pump failure death, or other) was made by a central adjudicating committee. The Fine and Gray method was employed to analyze factors associated with SCD. The variables submitted to the model included age (≥70 years), gender, LVEF (&amp;lt;30%), ischaemic aetiology and prescription of GBMT (use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist) at discharge. Results The mean age of studied patients was 70.9±14.2 years, and 70.0% were male. During the 1-year follow-up period, 262 deaths (10.1%) occurred, including 51 SCDs (2.0%). Older age was associated with an increased risk of SCD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-5.64, P=0.004). Further, patients with an ischaemic aetiology had a higher risk of SCD (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.06-3.22, P=0.032). During the study period, mean age remained constant (71.0 years to 70.7 years, P for trend =0.884). The proportion of ischaemic aetiology also remained constant (from 37.2% to 38.2%, P for trend =0.972). Overall, there were significant decreases in the incidence of all cause death and SCD (from 13.7% to 8.4%, P for trend =0.002; and from 3.5% to 1.0%, P for trend &amp;lt;0.001; Figure A). Notably, there was an increase in the prescription rate of three classes of GBMT at discharge (from 30.9% to 45.6%, P for trend &amp;lt;0.001; Figure B), and the rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use in eligible patients (New York Heart Association functional class II-III with LVEF ≤35%) remained constant (from 9.6% to 11.6%, P for trend =0.157; Figure B). Conclusions With the increasing use of GBMT, the incidence of SCD decreased in real-world patients with HFrEF registered in a Japanese acute HF registry over the past decade.

Renin–angiotensin system inhibition and mortality in patients undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease: insights from a multi-center observational study

ABSTRACT Background While the survival benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are firmly established in the general population, their efficacy within patient undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial. Methods Between January 2015 and June 2021, 1168 patients undergoing dialysis with CAD were assessed from 30 tertiary medical centers. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular death. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to account for between-group differences. Results Overall, ACEI or ARB were prescribed to 518 patients (44.3%) upon discharge. After a median follow-up of 22.2 months, 361 (30.9%) patients died, including 243 cardiovascular deaths. The use of ACEI or ARB was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause (25.3% vs 35.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.82, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (17.0% vs 23.8%; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48–0.83, p = 0.001). These findings remained consistent across IPTW and PSM analyses. Sensitivity analyses for ACEI and ARB use separately yielded similar results. Conclusions Our findings suggested that among patients undergoing dialysis with CAD, ACEI or ARB use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.

Elucidating the complex interplay between chronic kidney disease and hypertension.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension share a complex relationship, each exacerbating the progression of the other. CKD contributes to hypertension by decreasing renal function, leading to fluid retention and increased plasma volume, whereas hypertension exacerbates CKD by increasing glomerular pressure and causing renal damage. This review examines the intertwined nature of CKD and hypertension, exploring the factors driving hypertension in CKD and how hypertension accelerates CKD progression. It discusses the role of the renin-angiotensin system and inflammatory cytokines in this relationship, as well as the potential of blood pressure management to slow renal decline. While studies suggest that meticulous blood pressure control can help attenuate CKD progression, optimal management strategies remain unclear and require further investigation. This review also evaluates the evidence surrounding strict antihypertensive therapy in patients with CKD, considering both diabetic and non-diabetic cases. It recommends blood pressure targets based on CKD stage and presence of diabetes, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment approaches. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are highlighted as a key pharmacological intervention due to their renal protective effects, particularly in patients with CKD with proteinuria. However, evidence regarding their efficacy in patients with CKD but without proteinuria is inconclusive. This review underscores the need for comprehensive approaches to effectively address the intertwined nature of CKD and hypertension and calls for further research to optimize clinical management strategies in this complex interplay.

Association between gastroprotective agents and acute kidney injury in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Analysis of a Japanese hospital-based database.

The concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) potentially increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the risk of AKI has not been comprehensively assessed for the concomitant use of NSAIDs with gastroprotective agents such as misoprostol and PPIs. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of various gastroprotective agents affects the risk of AKI in patients receiving NSAIDs. The data analyzed were obtained from the JMDC hospital-based administrative claims database between April 2014 and August 2022. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) were compared with PPIs or misoprostol in patients receiving NSAIDs. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI. The covariates considered were age and sex, admission to intensive care unit, presence of comorbidities based on the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, loop diuretics, other diuretics, and lithium. AKI was identified by changes in serum creatinine. The distribution of AKI was analyzed using the log-rank test, and estimates of the incidence of AKI were compared among the groups using a Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying variables. Models were adjusted using a doubly robust method that accounts for the inverse probability of treatment weighting at baseline while adjusting for covariates. After screening, 11,688 patients were eligible for inclusion (1729 for H2RAs, 368 for misoprostol, and 9591 for PPIs). AKI occurred in 0.5% of H2RA recipients and 1.1% of PPI recipients; no AKI was observed in the misoprostol group. Compared with H2RAs, the risk of AKI tended to be higher with PPIs (adjusted hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 0.92-3.63, p = 0.08). Compared with H2RAs, PPIs may increase the risk of AKI in patients receiving NSAIDs, although no statistically significant difference was observed. Further research is required to assess the risk trade-off with consideration of both peptic ulcer prevention and the increased risk of AKI in patients concurrently treated with NSAIDs and H2RAs, misoprostol, or PPIs.