Renin-angiotensin System Blockers Research Articles

Clinical phenotyping and treatment response in patients with chronic heart failure: a latent class analysis from a Japanese multicentre registry

Abstract Background There are diversities of pathophysiology and co-morbidities in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Therefore, the identification of subgroups with different outcomes and treatment response patterns may help to tailor strategies to each individual HF patient. Purpose We sought to identify phenogroups of patients with different prognosis and response to medical therapies in patients with chronic HF. Methods A total of 1565 patients with a broad spectrum of LVEF in a prospective multicentre registry of patients with chronic HF were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2023. Latent class analysis was performed in each subgroup using 80 features including patients’ demographics, laboratory, and echocardiographic data. The optimal number of phenogroups was determined using the first minimum of the Bayesian information criterion. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalisation due to worsening HF. Results The analysis subclassified patients into six phenogroups. Patients in phenogroup A (young non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, n = 242, 15.5%) were the youngest and had lower LVEF and lowest prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and other comorbidities. Phenogroup B (atrial fibrillation [AF] and small left atrium, n = 282, 18.0%) had higher proportion of AF but smaller left atrium volume. Phenogroup C (ischaemic cardiomyopathy, n = 204, 13.0%) had the highest proportion of CAD and lower LVEF. Phenogroup D (classical HF with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF], n =308, 19.7%) had the highest age, proportion of female, LVEF and thickness of LV wall. Phenogroup E (elderly and AF , n = 235, 15.0%) had higher age, the highest proportion of AF and largest left atrium volume. Phenogroup F (biventricular failure and multiple comorbidities, n = 294, 18.8%) had the highest proportion of co-morbidities and the lowest LVEF, right ventricular systolic function and renal function. During a median follow-up period of 538 (interquartile range 286-701) days, the incidence of the primary outcome significantly differed among the phenogroups (P < 0.001, Figure 1). Regarding treatment response for renin-angiotensin system blockers and beta blockers, there were no significant associations between the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers and the risk of the primary outcome among the phenogroups whereas the use of beta-blockers was significantly associated with increased risk of the primary outcome in patients classified to phenogroup D (classical HFpEF) (hazard ratio 1.83 95% confidence interval 1.05-3.19) among the phenogroups (Figure 2). Conclusion We identified six phenogroups with distinct clinical outcomes in patients with chronic HF, and the use of beta-blockers might have unfavorable effect in the classical HFpEF phenogroup. This phenotyping provides novel risk stratification and may aid in clinical decision making.Clinical outcomes among the phenogroupsTreatment effect among the phenogroups

Use of renin-angiotensin system blockers and posttraumatic stress disorder risk in the UK Biobank: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundPrevious research has shown that the use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers is linked to a lower prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but longitudinal studies are scarce. We aimed to estimate the association between the use of RAS blockers and the risk of PTSD among individuals taking antihypertensive medications.MethodsThis longitudinal study included participants aged 40–69 from the UK Biobank. Exposure data were obtained from the initial assessment (2006–10), while outcome data were obtained from the online mental health questionnaire administered 6–11 years later (2016–17). We included participants who were under antihypertensive treatment and did not have a prior diagnosis of PTSD before the initial assessment. Use of RAS blockers was defined as self-reported regular use, at the initial assessment, of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Among participants who experienced adverse life experiences, cases of probable PTSD were defined with the six-item PTSD Checklist-Civilian version score ≥ 14. Logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between RAS blocker use and the risk of probable PTSD.ResultsOf the 15,954 participants (mean age = 59.9 years; 42.6% women) under antihypertensive treatment with no prior history of PTSD at the initial assessment, 64.5% were taking RAS blockers. After a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 1,249 (7.8%) were newly identified with probable PTSD. RAS blocker users had a lower risk of probable PTSD than RAS blocker non-users (OR = 0.84 [95% CI: 0.75–0.94]), whereas the use of other antihypertensive medications showed no such association (users vs. non-users; calcium channel blockers, OR = 0.99 [95% CI: 0.88–1.11]; beta-blockers, 1.20 [1.08–1.34]; and thiazide-related diuretics, 1.15 [1.03–1.29]). The association between probable PTSD risk and the use of ACEi vs. ARB showed no significant difference (p = 0.96).ConclusionsAmong individuals under antihypertensive treatment, the use of RAS blockers was associated with a decreased risk of probable PTSD. This added benefit of RAS blockers should be considered in the selection of antihypertensive medications.

SGLT2i and GLP1-RA exert additive cardiorenal protection with a RAS blocker in uninephrectomized db/db mice.

Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) is the main cause of end-stage renal disease in the developed world. The current treatment of the DKD with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade does not totally halt the progression to end stage kidney disease. Currently, several drugs have shown to delay DKD progression such as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). We hypothesized that by combining several drugs that prevent DKD progression on top of RAS blockade a synergistic effect would be achieved in terms of cardiorenal protection. In the present study, we analysed if the combination of a RAS blocker (ramipril) with a SGLT2i (empagliflozin) and/or GLP-1RA (semaglutide) in a type 2 diabetic mouse model could have add-on effects in kidney and heart protection. Male and female uninephrectomized type 2 diabetic db/db mice were treated with empagliflozin and/or semaglutide on top of ramipril during 8weeks. During the study body weight, water and food intake were weekly monitored, glycaemia biweekly and albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) before and after the treatment. At the end of the experiment, kidney and heart were isolated for histological and gene expression studies as well as for intrarenal RAS state assessment. Semaglutide combined with ramipril and/or empagliflozin significantly decreased albuminuria but only when combined with both compounds, semaglutide further decreased blood glucose, glomerular hyperfiltration in male mice and glomerular mesangial matrix expansion. In kidney, only the triple treatment with empagliflozin, semaglutide and ramipril reduced the expression of the proinflammatory and profibrotic genes ccl2 and TGFß1. In addition, the combination of empagliflozin and semaglutide on top of RAS blockade was superior in decreasing cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and heart fibrosis in db/db mice. Our results suggest that the combination of SGLT2i with GLP-1RA is superior in cardiorenal protection in DKD than the drugs administered alone on top of RAS blockade.

Renal outcomes with renin-angiotensin system blockers after unilateral nephrectomy

IntroductionDespite the benefits of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, their immediate use after nephrectomy has been limited because of concerns about impaired renal adaptation. We aimed to evaluate the effect of RAS blockers immediately following unilateral nephrectomy on renal adaptation. MethodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 580 patients who underwent elective unilateral nephrectomy between 2010 and 2020 and had pre-existing hypertension with antihypertensive medications. Patients were divided into groups according to the post-nephrectomy RAS blocker use. The primary outcome was renal adaptation defined as post-nephrectomy estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) / pre-nephrectomy eGFR × 100 at 1 month after surgery. Secondary outcomes included hyperkalemia during the first year and mortality or end-stage kidney disease within three years. ResultsThe mean age was 65.2 years, 406 (70%) were male, and 308 (53.1%) received RAS blockers after nephrectomy. The RAS blocker group was younger (63.8 vs 66.8 years) and had a higher eGFR (79.4 vs 75.5 ml/min/1.73 m2) than the control group. There were no differences between the groups in renal adaptation at one month (67.1% vs. 66.8%, P = 0.711) or in the incidence of hyperkalemia until one year postoperatively. The RAS blocker use was associated with better dialysis-free survival [Adjusted hazard ratio of multivariable Cox-regression model, 0.531; 95% confidence interval, 0.329-0.857; P = 0.010]. ConclusionThe immediate use of RAS blockers after unilateral nephrectomy did not deteriorate renal adaptation or increase hyperkalemia. Furthermore, the RAS blockers was associated with improved prognosis in terms of end-stage kidney disease and mortality.

Molecular Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: An Update.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). With the increasing prevalence of DM worldwide, the incidence of DKD remains high. If DKD is not well controlled, it can develop into chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which places considerable economic pressure on society. Traditional therapies, including glycemic control, blood pressure control, blood lipid control, the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers and novel drugs, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, have been used in DKD patients. Although the above treatment strategies can delay the progression of DKD, most DKD patients still ultimately progress to ESRD. Therefore, new and multimodal treatment methods need to be explored. In recent years, researchers have continuously developed new treatment methods and targets to delay the progression of DKD, including miRNA therapy, stem cell therapy, gene therapy, gut microbiota-targeted therapy and lifestyle intervention. These new molecular therapy methods constitute opportunities to better understand and treat DKD. In this review, we summarize the progress of molecular therapeutics for DKD, leading to new treatment strategies.

Prognosis of IgA nephropathy patient with proteinuria remission by supportive therapy: cohort from screening failed Chinese patients in TESTING study

Background During the run-in phase of the TESTING study, approximately half of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) were excluded due to proteinuria below 1 g/24 h after intensive supportive therapy. The long-term prognosis of these patients needs further investigation. Methods 112 screening failed patients in the TESTING study from 10 centers in China were enrolled in this retrospective study. The prognosis of 88 patients, who were excluded because of proteinuria below 1 g/24 h, was analyzed by Landmark Kaplan-Meier analysis. The composite kidney endpoint was defined by a ≥ 50% reduction in eGFR, ESKD (eGFR <15 mL/min per 1.73 m2), chronic dialysis for at least 6 months, or renal transplantation. Results In total, 88 patients were excluded due to proteinuria less than 1 g/24 h. During the follow-up, 73/88 (83.0%) patients received renin-angiotensin system blocker. 72/88 (81.8%) had stable proteinuria remission and did not receive immunosuppressive therapy (IST), and 16/88 (18.2%) received IST because of a relapse of proteinuria. Landmark Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that, the kidney survival from dialysis or composite kidney outcome of these excluded patients with IST was similar to those without IST during the early stages of follow-up (dialysis, before 60 months, p = 0.778; composite kidney outcome, before 48 months, p = 0.862); whereas the risk for dialysis of patients receiving IST was significantly higher than those without IST after 60 months (OR = 11.3, p = 0.03). Similarly, the risk for the composite kidney outcome of patients receiving IST was also significantly higher than those without IST after 48 months (OR = 5.92, p = 0.029). Conclusions IgAN patients who maintained a persistent remission of proteinuria after intensive supportive therapy had a much better long-term kidney outcome than those who experienced a relapse of proteinuria and needed IST.

Proteinuric and Non-Proteinuric Diabetic Kidney Disease: Different Presentations of the Same Disease?

Background: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a leading cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) worldwide. This review examines the potential differences in clinical presentation, outcomes, and management between individuals with proteinuric DKD (P-DKD) and non-proteinuric DKD (NP-DKD). Methods: We analyzed articles published globally from 2000 and 2024. Results: Individuals with NP-DKD generally have lower blood pressure levels and a more favorable lipid profile. In contrast, histological studies show that P-DKD is associated with more severe glomerulosclerosis, mesangial expansion, arteriolar hyalinosis, interstitial-fibrosis/tubular atrophy, and immune complex deposits. Additionally, those with P-DKD are more likely to develop diabetic retinopathy and have a higher risk of all-cause mortality and progression to ESKD. Strategies to slow DKD progression, applicable to both NP-DKD and P-DKD, include non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions such as renin–angiotensin system blockers, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, finerenone, and glucagon-like protein receptor agonists. Conclusions: NP-DKD and P-DKD represent different presentations of the same underlying disease.

Abstract P104: Kidney arteriolar responses to liver-targeted small interference RNA (siRNA) targeting angiotensinogen in diabetic rats: comparison with other renin-angiotensin system blockers

Objective: Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with ACE inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is associated with concentric thickening of renal arteries and arterioles and parenchymal disease. Here we evaluated to what degree this also occurs during RAS inhibition with siRNA targeting hepatic angiotensinogen (AGT). Methods: Male hypertensive heterozygous transgenic rats overexpressing mouse renin (TGR(mRen2)27 rats), made diabetic with streptozotocin, were treated with the ARB valsartan (4 mg/kg/day), the ACEi captopril (6 mg/kg/day), AGT siRNA (30 mg/kg every 2 weeks), AGT siRNA + valsartan, or captopril + valsartan for 3 weeks, starting at 15 weeks after induction of diabetes. After 3 weeks of treatment, kidneys were removed, and immunocytochemistry was performed on Bouin’s fixed kidney sections using antibodies against renin or α-smooth muscle actin. Juxtaglomerular index and wall thickness were assessed using tiling pictures of both renin and α-smooth muscle actin sections from the slides. Tubular degeneration was scored by summing up scores for tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and tubulointerstitial inflammation. Concentric vascular hypertrophy was assessed in a blinded manner. Results: All treatments increased juxtaglomerular index, and the largest increases were observed in dual treatment groups, consistent with the highest degree of RAS blockade in these groups. Tubular scores increased after induction of diabetes, and the highest scores were seen in dual treatment groups, significance versus vehicle being reached in the valsartan + captopril group only (P&lt;0.05). Afferent arteriole wall thickness increased in all treatment groups, and the greatest increases were observed during dual treatment. Finally, concentric vascular hypertrophy was observed in 1 of 7 (14%) diabetic Ren2 rats; this percentage increased during RAS blocker treatment of these rats, numerically reaching the highest values during dual treatment. Conclusions: Our data suggest that, in the hypertensive diabetic rat model, high levels of RAS blockade, irrespective of the type of blockade, may result in an increase in afferent arteriole thickness and concentric vascular hypertrophy. AGT siRNA in combination with RAS inhibitors should be further explored in clinical studies.

O52 KIDNEY ARTERIOLAR RESPONSES TO LIVER-TARGETED SMALL INTERFERENCE RNA (SIRNA) TARGETING ANGIOTENSINOGEN IN DIABETIC RATS: COMPARISON WITH OTHER RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM BLOCKERS

Objective: Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with ACE inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is associated with concentric thickening of renal arteries and arterioles and parenchymal disease. Here we evaluated to what degree this also occurs during RAS inhibition with siRNA targeting hepatic angiotensinogen (AGT). Methods: Male hypertensive heterozygous transgenic rats overexpressing mouse renin (TGR(mRen2)27 rats), made diabetic with streptozotocin, were treated with the ARB valsartan (4 mg/kg/day), the ACEi captopril (6 mg/kg/day), AGT siRNA (30 mg/kg every 2 weeks), AGT siRNA + valsartan, or captopril+valsartan for 3 weeks, starting at 15 weeks after induction of diabetes. After 3 weeks of treatment, kidneys were removed, and immunocytochemistry was performed on Bouin's fixed kidney sections using antibodies against renin or α-smooth muscle actin. Juxtaglomerular index and wall thickness were assessed using tiling pictures of both renin and α-smooth muscle actin sections from the slides. Tubular degeneration was scored by summing up scores for tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and tubulointerstitial inflammation. Concentric vascular hypertrophy was assessed in a blinded manner. Results: All treatments increased juxtaglomerular index, and the largest increases were observed in dual treatment groups, consistent with the highest degree of RAS blockade in these groups. Tubular scores increased after induction of diabetes, and the highest scores were seen in dual treatment groups, significance versus vehicle being reached in the valsartan+captopril group only (P&lt;0.05). Afferent arteriole wall thickness increased in all treatment groups, and the greatest increases were observed during dual treatment. Finally, concentric vascular hypertrophy was observed in 1 of 7 diabetic Ren2 rats; this percentage increased during RAS blocker treatment of these rats, numerically reaching the highest values during dual treatment. Conclusions: Our data suggest that, in the hypertensive diabetic rat model, high levels of RAS blockade, irrespective of the type of blockade, may result in an increase in afferent arteriole thickness and concentric vascular hypertrophy. AGT siRNA in combination with RAS inhibitors should be further explored in clinical studies.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lercanidipine Compared to Amlodipine as an Addition to Renin-angiotensin System Blockers in Diabetic Hypertensive Patients with Albuminuria in Thailand

Objective: Dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DHP-CCBs) is an appropriate add-on antihypertensive option for uncontrolled blood pressure diabetic hypertensive patients with albuminuria who are already taking renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs). Among DHP-CCBs, amlodipine is the first-line medication in combination with RASBs. However, new-generation DHP-CCBs like lercanidipine has demonstrated superior effectiveness and fewer side effects, although at a higher cost than amlodipine. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of lercanidipine versus amlodipine when added to RASBs in diabetic hypertensive patients with albuminuria. The objective is to provide robust evidence guiding the selection of the most suitable and worthwhile treatment option in Thailand. Materials and Methods: This study analyses the cost-effectiveness of lercanidipine versus amlodipine as an addition to RASBs in diabetic hypertensive patients with albuminuria. The analysis was conducted from a societal perspective using a Markov model. Results: The total costs of lercanidipine and amlodipine treatments were 370,392.83 baht and 384,221.85 baht, respectively. The life years gained for lercanidipine and amlodipine treatments were 11.33 years and 10.96 years respectively. Additionally, the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of lercanidipine and amlodipine treatments were 8.06 years and 7.51 years respectively. Conclusion: Due to lercanidipine's noticeable cost-effectiveness, lower costs, and longer QALYs. Adding lercanidipine has proven to be more cost-effective than amlodipine for diabetic hypertensive patients with albuminuria who have been unable to achieve their blood pressure goals with RASBs alone. Therefore, lercanidipine should be the preferred choice as an add-on to RASBs in Thailand. These results could significantly aid policymakers in making informed decisions.

Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers and Kidney Outcomes.

Early trials of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DCCBs) suggest a detrimental effect on intraglomerular pressure and an association with albuminuria. We sought to evaluate the associations of DCCB initiation with albuminuria and kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT) and to determine whether renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade modified these associations. We conducted a target trial emulation study using a new user, active comparator design and electronic health record data from Geisinger Health. We included patients without severe albuminuria or KFRT who were initiated on a DCCB or thiazide (active comparator) between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting, we performed doubly robust Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the association of DCCB initiation with incident severe albuminuria (urine albumin to creatinine ratio > 300 mg/g) and KFRT, overall and stratified by RAS blocker use. There were 11,747and 26,758 eligible patients initiating a DCCB and thiazide, respectively, with a weighted baseline mean age of 60 years, systolic blood pressure of 143 mm Hg, and eGFR of 86 mL/min/1.73 m2, and with a mean follow-up of 8 years. Compared with thiazides, DCCBs were significantly associated with the development of severe albuminuria (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.43), with attenuation of risk in the presence of RAS blockade (P for interaction < 0.001). The risk of KFRT was increased among patients without RAS blockade (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.19-2.31), but not with RAS blockade (P for interaction = 0.005). DCCBs were associated with increased risk of albuminuria and, in the absence of RAS blockade, KFRT. These findings suggest coupling DCCB therapy with RAS blockade may mitigate adverse kidney outcomes.

Characteristics of the phenotypes in prevalent and incident cases of heart failure in primary care: IBERICAN study

BackgroundThe management in primary care (PC) of the patients with Heart Failure (HF) is different from the management hospital, in a special way compared to cardiology departments.ObjectiveTo define the characteristics in both phenotypes of HF in prevalent and incident cases of HF in patients recruited in a large PC sample.MethodsWe proposed a and longitudinal analyses, in patients of the IBERICAN cohort, that recruited 8,066 patients in the Spanish primary care system, with 15,488 patients-years of follow-up. Of them, 252 patients (3.1%) had diagnoses of HF. HF was classified according to the 2014 guidelines in two groups: HF with a reduced eject fraction or HFrEF (LVEF < 50%) and HF with preserved eject fraction or HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%). Recommended treatment was defined as the patient receiving drug treatment with Renin-Angiotensin-System (RAS) blockers with beta-blockers and, optionally, spironolactone. The incidence of new cases of HF was calculated in the 7,814 patients without HF in the inclusion visit. Finally, we analysed which variables associated the onset new cases and get the hazard ratio (HR) with the confidence interval at 95% ([95%CI]). Clinical trials register: NCT02261441 (02/05/2017).ResultsThe HFpEF was the most frequent phenotype in prevalent cases (61.1%) and incident cases (73.9%). Patients with HFrEF had a higher prevalence of coronary heart disease (p = 0.008) and PAD (p = 0.028), and no statistically significant differences was observed in the therapeutic groups used between both groups. The incidence of HF was 12.8 cases/1000 inhabitants/year, 35.6% of them was diagnosed in PC. The renin-angiotensin system blockers were more used in PC (60%) and beta-blockers (100%) and spironolactone (60%) in hospital. The female sex showed a protective effect for incident cases (0.51 [0.28–0.92]); and AF (HR [95%CI]: 2.90 [1.51–5.54]), coronary heart disease (HR [95%CI]: 2.18 [1.19-4.00]) and hypertension (HR [95%CI]: 1.91 [1.00-3.64]) increased the risk of developing HF.ConclusionsHF phenotype more frequent and incident in PC was the HFpEF, but only one third of them are diagnosed in PC level. The female sex showed a protective effect and atrial fibrillation, ischaemic heart disease and hypertension increased the risk of develop HF.

Evolving the Role of Black Race in Hypertension Therapeutics.

Black race has been used to guide antihypertensive drug selection for Black patients based on predominant between race (same drug) and intra-race (different drugs) blood pressure (BP) response patterns. Accordingly, thiazide diuretics and calcium antagonists have been recommended over renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (angiotensin-receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and beta blockers for Black patients. Current antihypertensive drug prescribing reflects historical guidance as calcium antagonists and thiazide diuretics are prescribed more and RAS blockers less in Black than White patients. Hypertension control rates in Blacks, lag those for Whites despite their greater use of combination drug therapy and lesser use of monotherapy. This is also true across drug regimens containing any of the 4 recommended classes for initial therapy as well as for evidence-based combination drug therapy (calcium antagonist or thiazide diuretic + RAS blocker) regimens for which there is no known racial disparity in BP response. Current recommendations acknowledge the need for combination drug therapy in most, especially in Black patients. One exemplary comprehensive hypertension control program achieved >80% control rates in Black and White patients with minimal racial disparity while utilizing a race-agnostic therapeutic algorithm. Black patients manifest robust, if not outsized, BP responses to diet/lifestyle modifications. Importantly, race neither appears to be a necessary nor sufficient consideration for the selection of effective drug therapy. Accordingly, we urge the initiation of adequately intense race-agnostic drug therapy coupled with greater emphasis on diet/lifestyle modifications for Black patients as the cornerstone of a race-informed approach to hypertension therapeutics.

Real-World Treatment of Hypertension on Hemodialyses Data from a Large Polish Database.

The prevalence of hypertension among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing hemodialysis (HD) ranges from 72 to 88% depending on applied diagnostic criteria and the chosen method of blood pressure measurement. Despite the guidelines recommending the widespread use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) in patients with kidney disease, their utilization in patients on HD may be suboptimal, especially in patients with preserved diuresis. This hesitance that often steams from concern is often due to fear of a decrease in eGFR and a subsequent decrease in diuresis. The aim of this study was to compare clinical characteristics, blood pressure, safety, and HD adequacy indices in hypertensive HD patients on multiple antihypertensive drug regimens, including diuretic treated with RASB (RASB group) or without RASB (no-RASB) with preserved residual diuresis. We sought to examine the real-life use of RASB in HD patients in relation to their clinical characteristics, blood pressure, safety, and HD adequacy. From a database of 5,879 patients receiving HD (mean age 65.2 ± 14.2 years, 60% of males) of the largest provider of HD in the country, we selected the subgroup treated with at least three antihypertensive medications including diuretics. We compared patients treated with RASB to counterparts without RASB (no-RASB). The RASB group has similar age and gender proportions as well as BMI and bioimpedance compared to counterparts. However, dry body mass was significantly lower in the RASB group (78.1 ± 18.3 kg vs. 80.0 ± 18.2 kg, p &lt; 0.017). Prevalence of diabetes mellitus was similar in both groups, but RASB-treated patients have cardiovascular diseases more frequently (70.1 vs. 60.8%; p &lt; 0.001). Systolic blood pressure and the number of antihypertensive drugs used were significantly higher in RASB patients than in counterparts (146 ± 16 mm Hg vs. 144 ± 15 mm Hg; p &lt; 0.001 and 4.1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.5 ± 0.5; p &lt; 0001, respectively). RASB-treated patients have significantly longer dialysis vintage (52.7 ± 44.4 months vs. 40.2 ± 40.9 months; p &lt; 0.001) and dialysis time (722 ± 87.1 min/week vs. 713 ± 93.4 min/week; p &lt; 0.017) than counterparts. Serum potassium was slightly but significantly higher in RASB (5.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L vs. 5.1 ± 0.7 mmol/L; p &lt; 0.01). In the real world setting, RASB can be safely used in HD patients treated with diuretics with preserved residual diuresis. Given that many HD patients present numerous multimorbidities, RASB should not only be considered as an additional hypotensive drug in poorly controlled hypertension but also in other compelling indications in HD patients. The tendency toward hyperkalemia in HD patients could be effectively managed with appropriate diet and HD prescription adjustments.

Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment a clinical consensus statement from the Thai hypertension society

Resistant hypertension (RH) includes hypertensive patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) while receiving ≥3 BP-lowering medications or with controlled BP while receiving ≥4 BP-lowering medications. The exact prevalence of RH is challenging to quantify. However, a reasonable estimate of true RH is around 5% of the hypertensive population. Patients with RH have higher cardiovascular risk as compared with hypertensive patients in general. Standardized office BP measurement, confirmation of medical adherence, search for drug- or substance-induced BP elevation, and ambulatory or home BP monitoring are mandatory to exclude pseudoresistance. Appropriate further investigations, guided by clinical data, should be pursued to exclude possible secondary causes of hypertension. The management of RH includes the intensification of lifestyle interventions and the modification of antihypertensive drug regimens. The essential aspects of lifestyle modification include sodium restriction, body weight control, regular exercise, and healthy sleep. Step-by-step adjustment of the BP-lowering drugs based on the available evidence is proposed. The suitable choice of diuretics according to patients’ renal function is presented. Sacubitril/valsartan can be carefully substituted for the prior renin-angiotensin system blockers, especially in those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. If BP remains uncontrolled, device therapy such as renal nerve denervation should be considered. Since device-based treatment is an invasive and costly procedure, it should be used only after careful and appropriate case selection. In real-world practice, the management of RH should be individualized depending on each patient’s characteristics.

Prescripción de antihipertensivos en personas con diabetes tipo 2 en Andalucía y recomendaciones SEH-LELHA 2022: evaluación del coste y uso

ObjectiveThis study aims to analyze the prescription of antihypertensive drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Andalusia, comparing it with the SEH-LELHA 2022 guidelines, and to assess the direct cost of these treatments. Materials and methodsA multicentric, cross-sectional, and descriptive study was conducted with 385 T2D patients. Participants were randomly selected from the patient lists of 120 primary care physicians from Andalusia. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of T2D and complete clinical records for the year 2022. Demographic data and drug prescription information were collected, with the average cost per patient being calculated. ResultsThe mean age of the subjects was 70.72 years, with 53.51% being male. A total of 70.9% of the patients were taking antihypertensive drugs, the most common being ACE inhibitors/ARBs (70.9%), diuretics (70.1%), beta-blockers (40.0%), and calcium channel blockers (20.0%). Each patient took an average of 2.46±1.06 antihypertendsive, and fixed association of 2 or more antihypertensive drugs were used by 40.9% of the studied patients. The annual cost per patient was 141.45€/year. ConclusionsThe study reveals strong adherence to the SEH-LELHA 2022 guidelines among physicians in Andalusia regarding the of antihypertensives for T2D patients, with a significant preference for Renin-Angiotensin System blockers, diuretics, and beta-blockers. However, a notable deviation in prescription practices was observed with the frequent choice of doxazosin over spironolactone, despite the latter being the recommended option for resistant hypertension. Although the overall expenditure on antihypertensives is moderate, their cost-effectiveness is enhanced by the efficacy of these treatments in preventing cardiovascular complications.

Management of patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease referred to Hypertension Excellence Centres among 27 countries. On behalf of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Hypertension and the Kidney

Objective Real-life management of patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) among European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres (ESH-ECs) is unclear : we aimed to investigate it. Methods A survey was conducted in 2023. The questionnaire contained 64 questions asking ESH-ECs representatives to estimate how patients with CKD are managed. Results Overall, 88 ESH-ECS representatives from 27 countries participated. According to the responders, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, calcium-channel blockers and thiazides were often added when these medications were lacking in CKD patients, but physicians were more prone to initiate RAS blockers (90% [interquartile range: 70–95%]) than MRA (20% [10–30%]), SGLT2i (30% [20–50%]) or (GLP1-RA (10% [5–15%]). Despite treatment optimisation, 30% of responders indicated that hypertension remained uncontrolled (30% (15–40%) vs 18% [10%–25%]) in CKD and CKD patients, respectively). Hyperkalemia was the most frequent barrier to initiate RAS blockers, and dosage reduction was considered in 45% of responders when kalaemia was 5.5–5.9 mmol/L. Conclusions RAS blockers are initiated in most ESH-ECS in CKD patients, but MRA and SGLT2i initiations are less frequent. Hyperkalemia was the main barrier for initiation or adequate dosing of RAS blockade, and RAS blockers’ dosage reduction was the usual management.

Dilated Cardiomyopathy in the Cardiology Department of the CHU of Casablanca: A One-Year Observational Study

Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined by a left ventricle (LV) with reduced systolic function (&lt;45%) and dilation (LV volume &gt; 90 ml/m²), excluding coronary artery disease or sufficient load conditions to explain it. The etiologies are multiple and increasingly well-known. We conducted a single-centre, retrospective observational study within the cardiology department of the CHU IBN ROCHD in Casablanca, Morocco, over one year. The main objective was to describe the characteristics and particularities of patients followed for DCM. The diagnosis is based only on echocardiography, after exclusion of an ischemic cause, severe valvular disease, and congenital heart disease. During the study, 44 patients were included, with a male predominance of 63.6% versus 36.4%. The average age was 60 ± 16.8 years. The initial presentation of cardiomyopathy showed that 73% of patients were admitted with heart failure (HF). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 30.2 ± 7.9%. Among the attributed etiologies, idiopathic DCM was the main cause reported in 59% of cases, followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (14%) and myocarditis (14%). In our sample, treatment was based on HF management, including beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists. Implantation of a defibrillator for primary prevention concerned only one patient (3%) of the 33 patients for whom the theoretical indication was retained.

Utilizing synchronous care to improve cardiovascular and renal health among patients with type 2 diabetes: Proof-of-concept results from the DECIDE-CV clinical programme.

The management of patients with type 2 diabetes is asynchronous, i.e. not coordinated in time, resulting in delayed access to care and low use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients assessed in the 'synchronized' DECIDE-CV clinic. In this outpatient clinic, patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease are simultaneously assessed by an endocrinologist, cardiologist and nephrologist in the same visit. The primary outcome was use of GDMT before and after the assessment in the clinic, including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, renin-angiotensin system blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Secondary outcomes included the baseline-to-last-visit change in surrogate laboratory biomarkers. The first 232 patients evaluated in the clinic were included. The mean age was 67 ± 12 years, 69% were men and 92% had diabetes. In total, 73% of patients had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, 65% heart failure, 56% chronic kidney disease and 59% had a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g. There was a significant increase in the use of GDMT:sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (from 44% to 87% of patients), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (from 8% to 45%), renin-angiotensin system blockers (from 77% to 91%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (from 25% to 45%) (p < .01 for all). Among patients with paired laboratory data, glycated haemoglobin, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide levels significantly dropped from baseline (p < .05 for all). Joint assessment of patients with diabetes in a synchronized cardiometabolic clinic holds promise for enhancing GDMT use and has led to significant reductions in surrogate cardiovascular and renal laboratory biomarkers.

Revisiting Race and the Benefit of RAS Blockade in Heart Failure

Concerns have arisen that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers are less effective in Black patients than non-Black patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). To determine whether the effects of RAS blockers on cardiovascular outcomes differ between Black patients and non-Black patients with HFrEF. MEDLINE and Embase databases through December 31, 2023. Randomized trials investigating the effect of RAS blockers on cardiovascular outcomes in adults with HFrEF that enrolled Black and non-Black patients. Individual-participant data were extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Independent Personal Data (PRISMA-IPD) reporting guidelines. Effects were estimated using a mixed-effects model using a 1-stage approach. The primary outcome was first hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death. The primary analysis, based on the 3 placebo-controlled RAS inhibitor monotherapy trials, included 8825 patients (9.9% Black). Rates of death and hospitalization for HF were substantially higher in Black than non-Black patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for RAS blockade vs placebo for the primary composite was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69-1.03) in Black patients and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67-0.79) in non-Black patients (P for interaction = .14). The HR for first HF hospitalization was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.70-1.13) in Black patients and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56-0.69) in non-Black patients (P for interaction = .006). Conversely, the corresponding HRs for cardiovascular death were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65-1.07) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93), respectively (P for interaction = .99). For total hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular deaths, the corresponding rate ratios were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66-1.02) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.80), respectively (P for interaction = .27). The supportive analyses including the 2 trials adding an angiotensin receptor blocker to background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment (n = 16 383) gave consistent findings. The mortality benefit from RAS blockade was similar in Black and non-Black patients. Despite the smaller relative risk reduction in hospitalization for HF with RAS blockade in Black patients, the absolute benefit in Black patients was comparable with non-Black patients because of the greater incidence of this outcome in Black patients.