Renal Sympathetic Denervation For Treatment Research Articles

去肾交感神经术治疗高血压的研究进展

去肾交感神经术治疗高血压的研究进展

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of hypertension: where are we now in 2019?

Although sound physiological principles and surgical precedent underpin renal denervation as a therapy for treatment resistant hypertension, and early clinical studies had produced encouraging results, the first sham-controlled study (SYMPLICITY HTN-3) failed to achieve its primary efficacy endpoint. Lessons learnt from this trial, and the knowledge derived from further animal and autopsy work, have been applied in three recently published sham-controlled trials. These trials - SPYRAL OFF-MED, RADIANCE SOLO and SPYRAL ON-MED - using newer technologies, demonstrate a 5-10 mmHg incremental reduction in ambulatory SBP from RDN against sham-control, in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension taking 0-3 drugs. These results provide proof of principle of the blood pressure-lowering effect of renal denervation. We now require data on long-term safety and durability of the procedure. Research is needed to identify predictive markers of response as about one-third of individuals do not respond to renal denervation. Hard-outcome data would be welcome but might be difficult to acquire. Individuals with treatment resistance are obvious treatment candidates, but RDN may also potentially benefit those with medication nonadherence and/or intolerance and those unwilling to take pills.

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: Reappraisal of the available evidence

Afferent renal sympathetic nerve signaling regulates central sympathetic outflow. In this regard, renal sympathetic denervation has emerged as a novel interventional strategy for treatment of patients with resistant hypertension. Despite the disappointing results of the Simplicity HTN-3 randomized controlled trial, promoters of renal denervation argue that the negative results were due to ineffective denervation technique and poor patient selection. Yet, long-term "pathologic" increase of efferent sympathetic nerve activity is observed in many chronic disease states characterized by sympathetic overactivity, such as arrhythmia, heart failure, insulin resistance, and chronic kidney disease. In this review, we highlight the contemporary evidence on the safety/efficacy of renal denervation in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias: a review on current experimental and clinical findings.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) remain the major cause of mortality and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in almost all forms of heart disease. Despite so many therapeutic advances, such as pharmacological therapies, catheter ablation, and arrhythmia surgery, management of VAs remains a great challenge for cardiologists. Evidence from histological studies and from direct nerve activity recordings have suggested that increased sympathetic nerve density and activity contribute to the generation of VAs and SCD. It is well known that renal sympathetic nerve (RSN), either afferent component or efferent component, plays an important role in modulation of central sympathetic activity. We have recently shown that RSN activation by electrical stimulation significantly increases cardiac and systemic sympathetic activity and promotes the incidence of acute ischemia-induced VAs, suggesting RSN has a role in the development of VAs. Initial experience of RSN denervation (RDN) in patients with resistant hypertension showed that this novel and minimally invasive device-based approach significantly reduced not only kidney but also whole-body norepinephrine spillover. In addition, experimental studies find that left stellate ganglion nerve activity is significantly decreased after RDN. Based on these observations, it is reasonable to conclude that RDN may be an effective therapy for the management of VAs. Indeed, RDN has provided a protection against VAs in both animal models and patients. In this article, we review the role of the RSN in the generation of VAs and SCD and the role of RDN as a potential treatment strategy for VAs and SCD.

Renal sympathetic denervation in treatment of chronic kidney disease: a review

The effectiveness and safety of renal denervation for treating resistant hypertension have been demonstrated by previous studies;meanwhile its potential therapeutic role for chronic kidney disease has also been indicated.Recent clinical and animal studies have confirmed that renal denervation did not cause further damage to renal function of patients with chronic kidney disease;conversely,it may have potential benefits for the patients.In this paper,we reviewed the application and effect of renal denervation in chronic kidney disease.

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension: a meta-analysis

Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) for treatment of patients with resistant hypertension. Methods English and Chinese literatures of controlled clinical trials on RSD in treatment of resistant hypertension were searched from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang Database and CNKI up to February 2013.Meta-analysis was performed with the selected studies by using software Rev.Man 5.0. Results Seven studies involving 354 cases with RSD and 146 controls were included for analysis.Compared with control group, RSD significantly lower both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension (systolic, 1 month: MD=-18.04, 95%CI: -19.94--16.14, P<0.01; 3 months: MD=0.01, 95%CI: -28.10--17.98, P<0.01; 6 months: MD=-25.59, 95%CI: -34.08--17.11, P<0.01; diastolic, 1 month: MD=-7.53, 95%CI: -8.60--6.45, P<0.01; 3 months: MD=0.01, 95%CI: -12.5--4.47, P<0.01; 6 months: MD=-10.54, 95%CI: -16.44--4.63, P=0.000 5). In addition, there was no significant difference in adverse reactions between RSD treatment group and control group (OR=1.13, 95%CI: 0.34-3.76, P=0.84). Conclusions Renal sympathetic denervation can effectively reduce blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension 1-6 months postoperatively, without increase of adverse reactions.The long-term efficacy and safety need to be further observed. Key words: Sympathectomy; Hhypertension; Meta-analysis

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension: Egyptian experience.

Among the Egyptian population with essential hypertension, a minority are under control (systolic pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic pressure <90 mmHg), despite the use of multiple antihypertensive medications. In this article, we describe our experience with percutaneous treatment using renal artery radiofrequency (RF) ablation. To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of catheter-based radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension in Egyptian patients. Patients with essential hypertension unresponsive to at least 3 types of antihypertensive medical therapy (baseline office systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg) (n = 55) were enrolled between February 2012 and June 2013 and received percutaneous RF ablation. Patients were followed up for 6 months after treatment to detect any change in office-based measurement of blood pressure. Urine and blood samples were taken to evaluate the effects on renal function. A reduction of mean office blood pressure was seen from 174/103 ± 9/5 mmHg at baseline to 150/91 ± 8/5 mmHg at 6 months follow-up (P = 0.001). Also, we noted a significant decrease in plasma renin activity (3.66 ± 0.64 vs. 3.37 ± 0.47 ng/mL per hour; P = 0.003), and there were no periprocedural complications, no adverse events, and no change in renal function during the follow-up period. Also, no change was noted in the number of medications after 6 months (3.95 ± 1.64 vs. 3.67 ± 0.72; P = 0.27). In this observational study, catheter-based renal denervation causes sustained blood pressure reduction in patients with resistant hypertension, without serious adverse events.

Catheter-based radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: initial Egyptian experience

To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of catheter-based radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension. In a subpopulation of patients with essential hypertension, therapeutic targets are not met, despite the use of multiple types of medication. In this paper we describe our first experience with a novel percutaneous treatment modality using renal artery radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Thirty patients with essential hypertension unresponsive to at least three types of antihypertensive medical therapy (baseline office systolic blood pressure ⩾160 mmHg) were selected between March and September 2012 and received percutaneous RF ablation. Patients were followed up for 6 months after treatment. The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in seated office-based measurement of systolic blood pressure at 6 months. Another thirty patients were taken as control. A reduction of mean office blood pressure was seen from 170/102 ± 9/5 mmHg at baseline to 151/91 ± 8/6 mmHg at 6 months follow-up ( p = 0.001). Also, we noted a significant decrease in plasma renin activity (3.66 ± 0.64 versus 3.37 ± 0.47 ng/mL/h; p = 0.003). No periprocedural complications, adverse events or change in renal function were noted during follow-up. Catheter-based renal denervation seems an attractive minimally invasive treatment option in patients with resistant hypertension, with a low risk of serious adverse events.

Catheter-based radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension; initial Egyptian experience

To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of catheter-based radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension. In a subpopulation of patients with essential hypertension, therapeutic targets are not met, despite the use of multiple types of medication. In this paper we describe our first experience with a novel percutaneous treatment modality using renal artery radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Thirty patients with essential hypertension unresponsive to at least three types of antihypertensive medical therapy (baseline office systolic blood pressure ⩾160 mmHg) were selected between March and September 2012 and received percutaneous RF ablation. Patients were followed up for 6 months after treatment. The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in seated office-based measurement of systolic blood pressure at 6 months. Another thirty patients were taken as control. A reduction of mean office blood pressure was seen from 170/102 ± 9/5 mmHg at baseline to 151/91 ± 8/6 mmHg at 6 months follow-up ( p = 0.001). Also, we noted a significant decrease in plasma renin activity (3.66 ± 0.64 versus 3.37 ± 0.47 ng/mL/h; p = 0.003). No periprocedural complications, adverse events or change in renal function were noted during follow-up. Catheter-based renal denervation seems an attractive minimally invasive treatment option in patients with resistant hypertension, with a low risk of serious adverse events.

Catheter-based Radiofrequency Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of catheter-based radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension. Materials and MethodsTwenty-four patients with essential hypertension unresponsive to at least three antihypertensive agents underwent renal denervation (RDN). Three patients had variant renal anatomy. Comorbidities included diabetes (n = 11), renal failure (n = 4), and obstructive sleep apnea (n = 2). The effect on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) was assessed at 6 months. Patients with a decrease in systolic BP of at least 10mm Hg were considered responders. ResultsRDN was bilateral in 19 patients and single-sided in five. The 19 patients with bilateral RDN showed mean reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP of 20.7/8.7mm Hg±18.1/9.9 (systolic/diastolic; P = .0001/P = .0012). Sixteen bilaterally treated patients (84.2%) showed a systolic BP reduction of at least 10mm Hg and were considered responders, whereas only one of the five patients with single-sided RDN showed a response. Two responders with sleep apnea showed improvement in polysomnography indices, and one with left concentric ventricular hypertrophy showed complete cardiac remodeling 11 months after the RDN procedure. Renal function remained unchanged in all patients, including those with renal failure. Optical coherence tomography of the renal arteries in one patient showed sporadic endothelial scarring. Renal angiograms at 9 months (one patient) and 12 months (two patients) had normal findings. ConclusionsCatheter-based RDN was carried out safely, even in patients with comorbidities, abnormal renal arteries, or anatomic variants. The response rate for bilateral RDN (84.2%) was comparable to previous reports.

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension – Indigenous technique

The endovascular approach of ablation of renal sympathetic nerves is found to be effective in the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension. We report here our experience with the procedure in eight patients with drug resistant hypertension. We included patients in whom the blood pressure remained above 150/90 mmHg despite being on minimum three antihypertensive drugs. Radiofrequency ablation of the sympathetic nerves of both the renal arteries was done using conventional ablation catheters. The patients were followed at 1-month, 3 months and 6 months post procedure and blood pressure recorded. All patients underwent successful renal sympathetic denervation. The mean blood pressure of the patients was 181/102.5 mmHg before the procedure and the average requirement of antihypertensive drugs per day was 4. A significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure was observed post procedure which sustained over the follow up period of six months. The mean blood pressure observed at 1-month, 3 and 6 months were 137.5/80 mmHg, 136/81 mmHg and 137.5/81 mmHg, respectively. The average requirement of the number of antihypertensives also was reduced to 2.5 at the end of 6 months. There were no procedural complications. Catheter based renal denervation causes substantial and sustained blood pressure reduction without serious adverse events in patients with resistant hypertension.

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Hypertension: One-Year Results From the Symplicity HTN-2 Randomized Controlled Trial

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Hypertension: One-Year Results From the Symplicity HTN-2 Randomized Controlled Trial

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of drug-resistant hypertension one-year results from the Symplicity HTN-2 randomized, controlled trial

Background: Renal sympathetic nerve activation contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension. Symplicity HTN-2, a multicenter, randomized trial, demonstrated that catheter-based renal denervation produced significant blood pressure lowering in treatment-resistant patients at 6 months after the procedure compared with control, medication-only patients. Longer-term follow-up, including 6-month crossover results, is now presented. Methods and results: Eligible patients were on ≥3 antihypertensive drugs and had a baseline systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg (≥150 mm Hg for type 2 diabetics). After the 6-month primary end point was met, renal denervation in control patients was permitted. One-year results on patients randomized to immediate renal denervation (n = 47) and 6-month postprocedure results for crossover patients are presented. At 12 months after the procedure, the mean fall in office systolic blood pressure in the initial renal denervation group (−28.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, −35.4 to −20.7; p < 0.001) was similar to the 6-month fall (−31.7 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, −38.3 to −25.0; p < 0.16 versus 6-month change). The mean systolic blood pressure of the crossover group 6 months after the procedure was significantly lowered (from 190.0 ± 19.6 to 166.3 ± 24.7 mm Hg; change, −23.7 ± 27.5; p < 0.001). In the crossover group, there was 1 renal artery dissection during guide catheter insertion, before denervation, corrected by renal artery stenting, and 1 hypotensive episode, which resolved with medication adjustment. Conclusions: Control patients who crossed over to renal denervation with the Symplicity system had a significant drop in blood pressure similar to that observed in patients receiving immediate denervation. Renal denervation provides safe and sustained reduction of blood pressure to 1 year. Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. (Circulation. 2012;126:2976–2982.)

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Resistant Hypertension

Systemic arterial hypertension affects over 1.2 million people worldwide. Only 35% of hypertensive patients have controlled blood pressure levels. Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) has shown to significantly decrease blood pressure levels in patients with resistant systemic hypertension. Prospective, single arm, observational, multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing RSD. The primary endpoint was to assess systolic blood pressure levels at the 30-day follow-up. The secondary endpoint was to determine the presence of procedure-related adverse events. The first 20 patients undergoing RSD were included. The average blood pressure prior the procedure was 171.6/93.2 ± 15.5/ 11.3 mmHg, with the use of 4.1 ± 1.5 antihypertensive drugs per patient. Success rate was 95%, and 11.1 ± 1.9 ablations were performed per patient. A systolic blood pressure decrease of 29 ± 21 mmHg (P = 0.009) was observed 30 days after the procedure. There were no procedure-related complications. Catheter-based RSD in daily clinical practice patients significantly decreased blood pressure levels. In our experience, RSD proved to be feasible and safe. Denervação Simpática Renal para o Controle da Hipertensão Arterial Resistente A hipertensão arterial sistêmica afeta mais de 1,2 milhão de pessoas no mundo. Apenas 35% dos pacientes hiper-tensos têm valores de pressão arterial controlados. Recentemente a denervação simpática renal (DSR) tem demonstrado diminuir significativamente os valores de pressão arterial nos pacientes com hipertensão arterial sistêmica resistente. Estudo prospectivo, de braço único, observacional, multicêntrico, in-cluindo pacientes consecutivos submetidos a DSR. O objetivo primário foi avaliar os níveis da pressão arterial sistólica aos 30 dias de seguimento. O objetivo secundário foi determinar a ocorrência de qualquer evento adverso relacionado com o procedimento. Foram incluídos os primeiros 20 pacientes submetidos a DSR. A média de pressão arterial antes do procedimento foi de 171,6/93,2 ± 15,5/11,3 mmHg, com média de uso de 4,1 ± 1,5 fármacos anti-hipertensivos por paciente. A taxa de sucesso foi de 95%, tendo sido aplicadas 11,1 ± 1,9 ablações por paciente. Foi observada diminuição média de 29 ± 21 mmHg (P = 0,009) na pressão arterial sistólica 30 dias após o procedimento. Não houve complicação associada ao procedimento. A DSR por cateter em pacientes da prática clínica diária diminuiu significativamente os valores de pressão arterial. Em nossa experiência, a DSR demonstrou ser factível e segura.

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Resistant Hypertension

ABSTRACT Background Systemic arterial hypertension affects over 1.2 million people worldwide. Only 35% of hypertensive patients have controlled blood pressure levels. Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) has shown to significantly decrease blood pressure levels in patients with resistant systemic hypertension. METHODS Prospective, single arm, observational, multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing RSD. The primary endpoint was to assess systolic blood pressure levels at the 30-day follow-up. The secondary endpoint was to determine the presence of procedure-related adverse events. RESULTS The first 20 patients undergoing RSD were included. The average blood pressure prior the procedure was 171.6/93.2 ± 15.5/ 11.3 mmHg, with the use of 4.1 ± 1.5 antihypertensive drugs per patient. Success rate was 95%, and 11.1 ± 1.9 ablations were performed per patient. A systolic blood pressure decrease of 29 ± 21 mmHg (P = 0.009) was observed 30 days after the procedure. There were no procedure-related complications. Conclusions Catheter-based RSD in daily clinical practice patients significantly decreased blood pressure levels. In our experience, RSD proved to be feasible and safe.

Circulation: Clinical Summaries

<i>Circulation:</i> Clinical Summaries

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension: a systematic review.

Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) is a novel technique that is being investigated as treatment for resistant hypertension. To systematically evaluate the existing literature on the safety and efficacy of RSD in persons with resistant hypertension, online searches of Medline and the Cochrane Library Database (up to June 2012) were performed. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and conference proceedings published in English language were included. Nineteen studies (N=683 persons) were included. Follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 24 months. All studies reported significant reductions in systolic and diastolic pressures. Maximal reduction of blood pressure ranged from 18 mm Hg to 36 mm Hg (systolic) and 9 mm Hg to 15 mm Hg (diastolic). Sustained benefit of blood pressure reduction at 12 months was seen in 5 studies. No worsening of renal function was reported and there were few procedure-related adverse events such as pseudoaneurysm formation, hypotension, and bradycardia. Data from short-term studies suggest that RSD is a safe and effective therapeutic option in carefully selected patients with resistant hypertension. Long-term studies with large patient populations are needed to study whether this benefit is sustained with a demonstrable difference in cardiovascular disease event rates.

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension

Hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor and although there have been many improvements in pharmacological treatment, a significant percentage of patients are still considered resistant. The authors describe two cases of radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation that illustrate the feasibility of this new technique for the treatment of resistant hypertension. The procedure consists of the application of radiofrequency energy inside the renal arteries to ablate afferent and efferent sympathetic renal activity, which has been implicated in the pathophysiology of hypertension.

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Hypertension.

OPINION STATEMENT: Sympathetic nervous system activation of the heart, kidney and peripheral vasculature increases cardiac output, fluid retention and vascular resistance and plays an important role in acute and chronic BP elevation. Renal sympathetic denervation via a percutaneous radiofrequency catheter based approach is a safe and effective procedure that lowers BP in patients with resistant hypertension. Exploratory studies in patients with resistant hypertension and a variety of comorbidities, including insulin resistance/metabolic syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea and the polycystic ovary syndrome, have shown benefit of renal denervation in attenuating the severity of the comorbid conditions, as well as reducing BP. However, more studies are needed to further address the long term effects of renal denervation and its safety and effectiveness in other disease states such as congestive heart failure.

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of electrical storm: first-in-man experience

Sympathetic activity plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment option for patients with resistant hypertension, proved to reduce local and whole-body sympathetic activity. Two patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) (non-obstructive hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA III) suffering from therapy resistant electrical storm underwent therapeutic renal denervation. In both patients, RDN was conducted with agreement of the local ethics committee and after obtaining informed consent. The patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had recurrent monomorphic ventricular tachycardia despite extensive antiarrhythmic therapy, following repeated endocardial and epicardial electrophysiological ablation attempts to destroy an arrhythmogenic intramural focus in the left ventricle. The second patient, with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy, suffered from recurrent episodes of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The patient declined catheter ablation of these tachycardias. In both patients, RDN was performed without procedure-related complications. Following RDN, ventricular tachyarrhythmias were significantly reduced in both patients. Blood pressure and clinical status remained stable during the procedure and follow-up in these patients with CHF. Our findings suggest that RDN is feasible even in cardiac unstable patients. Randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to study the effects of RD in patients with electrical storm and CHF.