Renal Hilar Tumors Research Articles

Laparoscopic removal of retroperitoneal schwannoma in renal hilum: a case report

BackgroundSchwannomas in the renal hilum are rare among retroperitoneal tumors. However, the possibility of malignant findings cannot be ruled out, and surgery is often indicated. This case was expected to be difficult to remove laparoscopically because the tumor was sandwiched between the arteriovenous veins of the renal portal. Sometimes, the tumor should be resected with a conservative approach to the kidney to preserve the renal function.Case presentationOur patient was a 51-year-old Asian-Japanese man who was referred to our department for a retroperitoneal tumor in the renal hilum. Since malignancy could not be ruled out due to its size (45 × 48 × 55 mm) on imaging, the tumor was excised laparoscopically. Histopathology revealed schwannoma.ConclusionsWe herein report a case in which a renal hilar tumor between renal arteriovenous vessels was successfully resected laparoscopically.

A Novel Classification System of Renal Hilar Tumors for Surgical Guidance: Technique, Outcome, and Safety.

This study was designed to develop an innovative classification and guidance system for renal hilar tumors and to assess the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for managing such tumors. A total of 179 patients undergoing RAPN for renal hilar tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A novel classification system with surgical techniques was introduced and the perioperative features, tumor characteristics, and the efficacy and safety of RAPN were compared within subgroups. We classified the tumors according to our novel system as follows: 131 Type I, 35 Type II, and 13 Type III. However, Type III had higher median R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and ROADS scores compared with the others (all p < 0.001), indicating increased operative complexity and higher estimated blood loss [180.00 (115.00-215.00) ml]. Operative outcomes revealed significant disparities between Type III and the others, with longer operative times [165.00 (145.00-200.50) min], warm ischemia times [24.00 (21.50-30.50) min], tumor resection times [13.00 (12.00-15.50) min], and incision closure times [22.00 (20.00-23.50) min] (all p < 0.005). Postoperative outcomes also showed significant differences, with longer durations of drain removal (77.08 ± 18.16h) and hospitalization for Type III [5.00 (5.00-6.00) d] (all p < 0.05). Additionally, Type I had a larger tumor diameter than the others (p = 0.009) and pT stage differed significantly between the subtypes (p = 0.020). The novel renal hilar tumor classification system is capable of differentiating the surgical difficulty of RAPN and further offers personalized surgical steps tailored to each specific classification. It provides a meaningful tool for clinical practice.

Trans-retro-peritoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for posterior hilar tumor: technical feasibility and preliminary results.

Urologists still encounter challenges when it comes to the surgical management of tumors located on the posterior lip and posterior renal hilar region. We propose a trans-retro-peritoneal (TRP) technique to address the difficulties associated with posterior hilar tumors during retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Its efficacy was evaluated in a retrospective case-control study. The patients with posterior hilar tumors (≤7 cm) that underwent retroperitoneal LPN were included. The TRP technique allowed the posterior hilar tumor completely visible by incising the ventral peritoneum and rotating kidney ventrally during retroperitoneal LPN, which was applied in 36 cases, while the conventional retroperitoneal LPN was performed in 22 cases. Perioperative data were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of TRP-LPN. In TRP-LPN group, the TRP technique was successfully performed in all the patients without converting to open surgery or radical nephrectomy. The warm ischemia time was significantly shorter in TRP-LPN group than conventional LPN group (20.3 vs. 28.5 min, P<0.001). Furthermore, the mean estimated blood loss in TRR-LPN group was significantly less than that in conventional LPN group (86.5 vs. 90.9 mL, P<0.05). The mean operation time and recovery time of gastrointestinal function were similar between two groups. No severe complications occurred, and no positive surgical margin was found. The rate of Trifecta achievement was 50.0% (18/36) and 31.8% (7/22) respectively for TRP-LPN and conventional LPN (P=0.175). After mean follow-up of 21 months, no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all cases. Our findings, as demonstrated by the Trifecta outcomes, support the feasibility and efficacy of TRP-LPN in managing posterior renal hilar tumors. This approach may be considered as an efficient option for surgical management of such tumors.

ASO Author Reflections: Microwave Ablation-Assisted Clampless and Sutureless Technique for Renal Hilar Tumors.

ASO Author Reflections: Microwave Ablation-Assisted Clampless and Sutureless Technique for Renal Hilar Tumors.

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors.

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors.

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: Parenchymal preservation and functional recovery.

To determine whether robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) can benefit patients in terms of functional recovery in the treatment of renal hilar tumors compared to conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CLPN). Between January 2019 and July 2021, patients with hilar tumors who underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) were acquired at our center and were classified into RALPN and CLPN groups. Ipsilateral parenchymal volume (IPV) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were determined independently 3-5 days before and 3 months after PN using contrast-enhanced computed tomography and nuclear renal scans. Pearson correlation was used to determine the link between ipsilateral GFR preservation and IPV preserved. Concurrently, multivariable analysis was employed to determine characteristics associated with functional recovery. A total of 96 patients with hilar tumors were studied, of which 41 received RALPN and 55 received CLPN. Excisional parenchymal volume was 27 and 37 cm3 (p = 0.005) in RALPN and CLPN groups, respectively, and IPV preserved was 77% and 68% (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the ipsilateral GFR preserved was 77.7% and 75.3%, respectively (p = 0.003). On Pearson correlation, ipsilateral GFR preservation was linked with IPV preserved (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). According to a multivariate study, baseline GFR, IPV preserved, and surgical procedures (RALPN vs. CLPN) were significant factors influencing functional recovery. Our study suggests that RALPN, rather than CLPN, can achieve better functional recovery in the treatment of hilar tumors due to its ability to win more IPV preserved. RALPN should be recommended as the first-line treatment for hilar tumors, but randomized controlled trials are required to validate our findings.

Combination of holographic imaging with robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumor treatment.

To evaluate the clinical value of the holographic imaging technology in combination with robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal hilar tumor treatment. From Dec. 2018 to Dec. 2021, patients diagnosed with renal hilar tumor were included in this retrospective study. Before the surgery, the engineers established the holographic image models based on the enhanced CT data. The models were used inpatient consultation,pre-surgery planning and surgery simulation. During the RAPN, the navigation was achieved by real-time overlapping of the holographic images on the robotic surgery endoscopic views. The navigation technique helped the surgeon to identify the important anatomic structures such as tumor, renal vein, renal artery, and pelvis. There were total of eight patients with renal hilar tumor who underwent RAPN combined with holographic imaging technique. The mean age was 57.3years, the median ASA score was 2. The mean tumor size was 42.4mm and the median RENAL Nephrometry score was 9.5. The clinical stages were cT1a (37.5%) and cT1b (62.5%). All the procedures were performed uneventfully by one surgeon. The mean operative time was 144.3min, and the mean warm ischemia time was 27.9min. The mean estimated blood loss was 86.3ml. There was no conversion to open surgery or radical nephrectomy. There were no Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 perioperative complications. Using the holographic imaging technique, thepre-surgery planning, simulation of renal arterial clamp and excision of the tumor, and intraoperative navigation were feasible and helpful in facilitating RAPN.

Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Renal Surgery for Hilar Tumors: Informing the Decisions in Risk-Adapted Management

To describe the safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy (PN) in comparison to radical nephrectomy (RN) for surgically managed renal hilar tumors. We retrospectively reviewed institutional records of patients with a small (<5 cm) solitary renal (hilar or non-hilar) mass who underwent PN or RN between 2008 and 2018. Hilar tumors were defined as those at medial position, abutting the renal vessels. Recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of 1,951 eligible patients, 399 had hilar tumors (292 scheduled for PN, 107 RN) and 1,552 had non-hilar tumors (scheduled for PN). We found no significant differences in survival measures between hilar and non-hilar tumors in patients selected for PN. Patients scheduled for PN for hilar tumors had higher rates of ≥grade II postoperative surgical complications compared to patients scheduled to receive PN for non-hilar tumors (13% vs 8.6%; log-rank P=.018) and non-statistically significantly elevated rates of ≥grade II complications compared to patients scheduled for RN for hilar tumors (13% vs 6.5%; difference 6%, 95% CI 0.4%, 13%; log-rank P=.07). PN for hilar and non-hilar renal masses (<5cm) experience comparable oncologic outcomes though increased risk of complications for hilar masses. PN for hilar tumors was associated with better renal function and overall survival with non-statistically elevated risk of grade II or higher complications than RN. A renal tumor located at the hilum should not be a contra-indication for performing PN.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study.

Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1-cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019. Seventy-five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115-390] vs. 190 [110-390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12-60] vs. 27 [17-41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3-16] vs. 7.5 [4-18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4-144] vs. 101.3 [64.2-134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2 , p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43-169] vs.78.5 [50-281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However,patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50-1500] vs. 200 [20-1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow-up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5-year recurrence-free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640). For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors.

Use of posterior radial nephrotomy in laparoscopic enucleation of renal hilar tumors.

Centrally located completely endophytic renal hilar tumors pose a technical challenge, especially during a minimally invasive surgery. Relation of the tumor to the renal vasculature decides the approach. Tumors placed anterior to the vasculature can be approached in the anterior trans-hilar manner. However, tumors placed posterior to the vasculature need a posterior approach, which is quite a difficult maneuver during transperitoneal laparoscopy. Adequate exposure to access the resection plane is the key principle. We describe a laparoscopic technique for enucleation of such tumors, applying the surgical principle of radial nephrotomy in the intersegmental plane which is usually performed to remove renal stones.

Comparison of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Hilar Tumors: Results from a Tertiary Referral Center

Objective: To compare perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal hilar tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors at our institution between January 2014 and August 2018. The entire cohort was divided into two groups according to surgical approach: RAPN and LPN group. Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of the two groups were collected and compared. Results: A total of 116 patients with renal hilar tumors were identified, including 52 patients who underwent RAPN and 64 patients who underwent LPN, respectively. Demographic baseline characteristics were similar in two groups. There were no differences between the RAPN and LPN groups for operative time, transfusion rate, conversion rate, surgical margin, perioperative complication, and hospital stay. Compared with the LPN group, the RAPN group was associated with significant less estimated blood loss (100 vs 150 mL; p < 0.001), shorter warm ischemia time (20.3 vs 24.5 minutes; p = 0.001), and higher direct cost (p < 0.001). Percentage of estimated glomerular filtration rate change at 6 months after surgery was lower in RAPN group than LPN group (10.4% vs 15.2%; p = 0.020). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of oncologic outcomes. Conclusions: For hilar tumors, both RAPN and LPN were safe and feasible surgical treatments. RAPN might be associated with superior perioperative outcomes (less estimated blood loss and shorter warm ischemia time) and better postoperative renal functional preservation. RAPN might be the preferred option when condition permits for renal hilar tumors.

Kidney ventrally rotation technique in retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior hilar tumor: technical feasibility and preliminary results

PurposeThe retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is suitable for tumors locating on the posterior side of the kidney. However, the posterior hilar tumor poses an additional surgical challenge due to the special location and poor tumor exposure. We developed a novel kidney ventrally rotation technique to overcome this difficulty during retroperitoneal RAPN and evaluated its efficacy in a retrospective case-control comparative study.MethodsFrom March 2016 to April 2019, a total of 39 patients with posterior renal hilar tumor underwent retroperitoneal RAPN. The kidney ventrally rotation technique, which improved the tumor exposure by opening the peritoneum and rotating the kidney ventrally, was applied in 24 cases, and the conventional RAPN was performed in the other 15 cases (control group). Perioperative data was analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of the kidney ventrally rotation technique.ResultsIn kidney rotation group, the 24 patients underwent RAPN successfully without converting to open surgery or radical nephrectomy. The warm ischemia time was 17.4 ± 6.6 min, which was significantly shorter than 24.5 ± 8.3 min in control group. The mean operation time (80 ± 24 min) and estimated blood loss (104 ± 65 ml) were not different from the control group. No sever complications occurred, and no positive surgical margin was found in all the malignant cases. After 14 months follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all cases.ConclusionKidney ventrally rotation technique is safe and feasible for improving the exposure of posterior renal hilar tumor during retroperitoneal RAPN. It could be regarded as an efficient option for the management of posterior hilar tumor.

Retroperitoneoscopic approach for highly complex posterior renal hilar tumors

ABSTRACTObjectives:To show our single-center experience in retroperitoneoscopic approach for highly complex posterior hilar tumors. Minimally invasive nephron sparing surgery for renal hilar tumors is extremely challenging due to their anatomic location, close to the main renal vessels and the collecting system (1). Transperitoneal approach is feasible, but highly complex because the anterior disposition of the vasculature. Retroperitoneal approach can easily provide access to the posterior hilar structures and the posterolateral surface of the kidney(2, 3).Materials and Methods:We retrospectively reviewed our hilar renal tumor database and analyzed those in which a retroperitoneoscopic approach was chosen. The RENAL score was then calculated, and operative and ischemia times were recorded. We also collected the mean hospital stay and the presence of complications. Pathology reports and follow-up were also gathered.Results:Five of our twelve highly complex hilar renal tumor patients were treated using a retroperitoneoscopic approach. Mean RENAL score was 10. Mean operative time was 135 minutes. Mean warm ischemia time was 14 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 4 days. We have recorded 2 complications. One patient required a transfusion and another presented with an urinary fistula which was treated by double J stent placement. The pathology report showed a clear cell renal cell carcinoma pT1a in most of the cases. Only one patient had a positive margin. To date, no recurrences have been noticed.Conclusions:The treatment of complex renal hilar tumors in a minimally invasive fashion is highly challenging even in experienced hands. Retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy is feasible, safe and effective for the treatment of such lesions. Long-term oncologic outcomes of this approach are awaited.

Vessel and Tension-Free Reconstruction During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar Tumors: "Garland" Technique and Midterm Outcomes.

Purpose: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly applied to renal hilar tumors. The present study aims to introduce our vessel and tension-free reconstruction technique and discuss the perioperative, functional, and midterm oncologic outcomes of RAPN for hilar tumors in a large cohort. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 286 consecutive patients with hilar tumors who underwent RAPN from June 2013 to December 2016 in our center. Our anatomy-based "Garland" technique specialized in protecting the large hilar vessels and minimizing the tension of suturing the defect via trans/retroperitoneal approaches for anterior/posterior lip hilar tumors, respectively. Results: "Garland" technique was effectively applied in 286 patients, and the warm ischemia time was 18.2 ± 4.1 minutes. Median estimated blood loss for RAPN was 100 mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 50-200 mL). Median operative time was 120 minutes (IQR: 90-150 minutes). No patient was converted to open surgery. Postoperative stay was 4.0 days (IQR: 4.0-5.0 days). Three patients (1.1%) had positive surgical margin. Two patients (0.7%) received blood transfusion. Complications occurred in 20 patients (7.0%), in which 18 patients were Clavien 1 and 2. Three patients (1.1%) had local recurrence. All patients were alive at a 48-month median follow-up (range: 24-66 months). Conclusions: "Garland" technique is safe and feasible for hilar tumor resection and kidney reconstruction. The trans/retroperitoneal approaches are options for anterior/posterior hilar tumors. Longer follow-up involving more patients is required.

Review of upper urinary modified minimal invasive surgical technology

Upper urinary surgery is an important area of urology surgery. Open surgery used to be the gold standard of upper urinary surgery. With the development of medical techniques, minimal invasive surgeries including laparoscopic and robot assisted-laparoscopic surgery have gradually replaced the open surgery. Because of the complexity and diversity of upper urinary diseases, surgeries sometimes are difficult, and minimal invasive surgeries require higher surgical abilities of urologists than open surgeries. In recent years, depending on our surgical experience and international reports, our team from three Chinese medical centers summarizes techniques of upper urinary minimal invasive surgeries. For malignant diseases, such as renal and ureteral carcinomas, it's important to totally remove the tumor first, and then to avoid the surgical injuries. We summarize surgical experience of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for moderately complex renal hilar tumors. Our team modified minimal invasive techniques for some complex tumors, including ring suture technique for renal hilar tumors, internal suspension technique for renal ventral tumors, and combination retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery with mini-flank incision for complex renal tumors. While for begin diseases, urologists should focus on the resections and surgical injuries at the same time. We have reported the novel technique of laparoscopic aspiration for central renal angiomyolipoma, making the surgery simple and available. For reconstruction surgeries, operations should be based on several principals. We generalize it as "4TB principals", which include "tension-free", "water-tight", "thin suture", "no touch of the key area" and "protecting the blood supply". Depending on the localization, length, and etiology of the strictures, different techniques are required. Our team summarize the pyeloplasty, ureteral reimplantation and ileal ureter replacement based on our surgical experience. For infant upper urinary surgeries, our team has made invasive surgeries that can be used in complex diseases, such as duplex kidney. Based on years of surgical techniques, our modified surgeries achieve a better subjective cosmetic result than the traditional surgeries. In the future, the standardized, practical, simple and individual minimal invasive surgical technique will become the main direction in the future researches.

Navigation of Intelligent/Interactive Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technique in Laparoscopic or Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Hilar Tumors.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the navigation of intelligent/interactive qualitative and quantitative analysis (IQQA) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technique in laparoscopic or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (LPN or RAPN) for renal hilar tumors. Patients and Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with hilar tumors from February 2016 to February 2018. IQQA 3D reconstruction technique was applied for the purpose of navigation and resection of the tumors. Relevant clinical parameters and surgical outcomes were recorded. Results: All 26 LPN or RAPN were effectively completed without conversion to a hand-assisted or an open approach. Under the navigation of IQQA, all tumors were found precisely at the first time during surgeries. The mean operative time was 142 minutes (142 ± 35), with a mean warm ischemia time of 24.3 minutes (24.3 ± 9.5). The estimated blood loss was 156 mL (156 ± 112). No intraoperative complications occurred. Two patients suffered from postoperative complications. All patients had negative margins on the final pathological examination. At a mean follow-up period of 3 months, the mean glomerular filtration rate is 22.5 mL/min (22.5 ± 7.1) without tumor recurrence. Conclusions: With peculiar features, such as accurate location, complete resection, and fewer perioperative complications, the navigation of IQQA 3D reconstruction technique in partial nephrectomy represents a safe and effective procedure for hilar tumors.

Renal Hilar Lesions: Biological Implications for Complex Partial Nephrectomy

ObjectiveTo perform a comprehensive histopathologic review of sporadic resected solitary cT1 renal masses comparing those with and without radiographic involvement of the hilum. Materials and MethodsA prospectively maintained database was queried for all cT1 renal masses undergoing resection classified per the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Hilar masses were defined as tumors that abut the main renal artery or vein on cross-sectional imaging. Demographic, treatment, renal mass, and histopathologic characteristics were compared between hilar and nonhilar renal masses. Multivariate regression model analyses were performed to assess factors associated with renal mass upstaging and disease recurrence. ResultsA total of 1324 stage 1 renal masses met criteria for analysis of which 226 (17.1%) were defined as hilar. Hilar masses were larger, scored with higher complexity, and more likely to undergo a radical nephrectomy. On histopathologic analysis, we found no difference between hilar and nonhilar masses regarding the incidence of malignancy, presence of high nuclear grade, or risk of upstaging. On multivariate analysis, a tumor's hilar location was not associated with upstaging or disease recurrence. ConclusionWe present a comprehensive histopathologic review of a large cohort of cT1 hilar lesions noting no difference in the risk of malignancy, high nuclear grade, upstaging, or recurrence when compared to nonhilar lesions. Together, these data suggest that there is no compelling cancer-specific rationale to perform a radical nephrectomy when managing renal hilar tumors.

Trifecta Outcomes in Renal Hilar Tumors: A Comparison Between Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomy.

To report a comparative analysis of outcomes in patients who underwent excisions of renal hilar tumors using both open and robotic approaches. We retrospectively reviewed robotic and open patients who underwent partial nephrectomy of renal hilar tumors between 2011 and 2016. "Trifecta" was defined as negative surgical margins, no complications, and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) preservation of ≥90% at last follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to equilibrate treatment groups, minimize selection bias, and optimize inference on the basis of each patient's clinicodemographic characteristics. One hundred robotic and 64 open patients had sufficient data for IPTW. After weighting, there were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p < 0.05). On adjusted analyses, robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) achieved equivalent rates of trifecta to open surgery (21.1% vs 13.9%, respectively, p = 0.387). There were no differences between robotic and open cohorts for negative margin rates (72.8% vs 90.4%, p = 0.124), absence of complications (68.6% vs 75.2%, p = 0.587), or GFR ≥90% (39.4% vs 21.6%, p = 0.111). The robotic cohort had a shorter mean length of stay (3.8 vs 5.0 days, p = 0.012), and no difference in estimated blood loss (253.3 vs 357.1, p = 0.091) or operating time (199.8 vs 200.4, p = 0.961). In our analysis both open and RPN for hilar tumors were equally likely to achieve a low "trifecta" outcome with a shorter mean length of stay in the robotic cohort.

AB073. Application of IQQA three-dimensional reconstruction technique in precise laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors

BackgroundTo evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the application of IQQA three-dimensional reconstruction technique in precise laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN or RAPN) for renal hilar tumors.MethodsThe study retrospectively reviewed 11 patients with hilar tumors from February 2016 to February 2017. Of the 11 patients, 4 were women and 7 were men, with an average age of 51.3 years (range, 38 to 70 years). The average tumor size was 3.1 cm (range, 1.7 to 4.3 cm). For tumor stage, nine patients were in T1a stage and two patients were in T1b stage. The average R.E.N.A.L score was 8.7 (range, 7 to 10). The mean preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 40.6 mL/min (range, 32 to 45 mL/min). IQQA three-dimensional reconstruction technique was applied for the purpose of precise navigation and resection of the tumors. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, major perioperative complications, and postoperative renal function.ResultsAll 11 laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic hilar partial nephrectomies were successfully completed without conversion to a hand-assisted or an open approach. Under the navigation of IQQA, all tumors were found precisely at the first time during surgeries. The final pathologic examination revealed that all the 11 patients were clear cell renal cell carcinomas. The mean operative time was 142 minutes (range, 90 to 230 minutes), with a mean warm ischemia time of 24.3 minutes (range, 17 to 33 minutes). The estimated blood loss was 146 mL (range, 50 to 400 mL). No intraoperative complications occurred. Two patients suffered from postoperative complications. One patient with gross hematuria was recovered by consistent bladder irrigation. The other patient with postoperative hemorrhage needed transfusion. All patients had negative margins on the final pathologic examination. At a mean follow-up period of 3 months, the mean GFR is 22.5 mL/min (range, 13 to 34 mL/min) without any disease recurrence.ConclusionsWith peculiar features, such as accurate location, complete resection and fewer perioperative complications, the application of IQQA three-dimensional reconstruction technique in precise partial nephrectomy represents a safe and effective procedure for hilar tumors.

VE21 - Renal hilar tumor enucleation with 3D model-assisted planning

VE21 - Renal hilar tumor enucleation with 3D model-assisted planning