In Wound Culture: Trauma in the Pathological Public Sphere (1997), Mark Seltzer approaches our culture in terms of the collapse of private and (subject and world), claiming (as Susan Sontag later would) that there is a public fascination with torn and open bodies and torn and open persons, calling it a gathering around shock, trauma, and the wound. Using examples from literature and film, Seltzer examines this element of spectacle, what he refers to as the pathological sphere, concluding that sociality and the wound have become inseparable, an intriguing commentary on the collective response to images of trauma. (1) In Regarding the Pain of Others (2003), Sontag offers a historical survey of representations of atrocity, focusing on images of war using examples ranging from Goya's early nineteenth-century Disasters of War to one of the many exhibitions of 9/11 photographs, Here is New York. She begins to get at the politics of meaning-making when she notes that such photographs elicit varied and opposing reactions, ranging from calls for peace to cries for revenge as well as bemused awareness ... that terrible things happen. She points out (rightly so when one considers the speed of image capture, dissemination, and simultaneous access) that this witnessing of atrocities is an inevitable condition of modernity and that the knowledge of war gained by those who have not experienced it firsthand is informed exclusively by such images, which are considered as real. She writes of the shame and shock of looking at horror and questions who should have the right to experience these images suggesting it is only those with the ability to alleviate the suffering, and claiming those without that agency to be voyeurs. (2) Art critic and cultural theorist Abigail Solomon-Godeau, in Remote Control: Abigail Solomon-Godeau's Dispatches from the Image Wars (2004), argues that the image is always considered more volatile, dangerous, and uncontrollable than written or verbal descriptions, even detailed ones. She discusses the issue of transgressive imagery as it transcends the control of the entities that produce it. Solomon-Godeau contends that images take on a second active life when those who view the images make their own meaning from them.1 It is this active and resistant response- by artists and citizens--that the contributors to this issue explore. As x allows greater access to images emanating from around the world (and from increasingly diverse sources) and as war, famine, natural disaster, and political and social strife continue to plague numerous regions of the globe, the images of these conditions are also readily available to consumers, often without full contextual information. How viewers receive and perceive these images informs their behavior and by extension our social realities. This special issue of Afterimage works to provide a greater understanding of these media effects on a cultural level through both the production of artistic responses and analyses of imagery found in mainstream media, contributing to the field of atrocity studies and to ongoing conversations about the aestheticization of images of violence. Engaging topics and events ranging across centuries--from Renaissance painting and the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, to 9/11 and the current wars in the Middle East--the critics, scholars, and artists presented here transcend received notions of the political to engage in a dialogue that, we hope, extends beyond these pages. Henry Giroux writes about the imposed forgetting and militarized pleasure found in the infamous Kill Team11 photographs, viewing them as emblematic of a new register of as much as a failed sociality--a widespread depravity of aesthetics that results in the transformation of spectacles of violence and brutality into collective pleasure. Francis Frascina discusses the kill team photographs as consistent with processes of disavowal at work in state censorship, embedded reportage, and numbing media saturation that dehumanize the Other, as well as the work of artists attempting to counter these processes by placing viewers in a to face relation with the Other. …
Read full abstract