Removal Of Esophageal Foreign Bodies Research Articles

Natural airway as an alternative to intubation for pediatric endoscopic esophageal foreign body removal: A retrospective cohort study of 326 patients.

Anesthesia is required for endoscopic removal of esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) in children. Historically, endotracheal intubation has been the de facto gold standard for airway management in these cases. However, as more elective endoscopic procedures are now performed under propofol sedation with natural airway, there has been a move toward using similar Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) for select patients who require endoscopic removal of an EFB. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared endoscopic EFB removal with either MAC or endotracheal intubation. Descriptive statistics summarized factors stratified by initial choice of airway technique, including intra- and postanesthesia complications and the frequency of mid-procedure conversion to endotracheal intubation in those initially managed with MAC. To demonstrate the magnitude of associations between these factors and the anesthesiologist's choice of airway technique, univariable Firth logistic and quantile regressions were used to estimate odds ratios (95% CI) and beta coefficients (95% CI). From the initial search, 326 patients were identified. Among them, 23% (n = 75) were planned for intubation and 77% (n = 251) were planned for MAC. Three patients (0.9%) who were initially planned for MAC required conversion to endotracheal intubation after induction. Two (0.6%) of these children were admitted to the hospital after the procedure and treated for ongoing airway reactivity. No patient experienced reflux of gastric contents to the mouth or dislodgement of the foreign body to the airway, and no patient required administration of vasoactive medications or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients had higher odds that the anesthesiologist chose to utilize MAC if the foreign body was a coin (OR, 3.3; CI, 1.9-5.7, p < .001) or if their fasting time was >6 h. Median total operating time was 15 min greater in intubated patients (11 vs. 26 min, p < .001). This study demonstrates that MAC may be considered for select pediatric patients undergoing endoscopic removal of EFB, especially those who have ingested coins, who do not have reactive airways, who have fasted for >6 h, and in whom the endoscopic procedure is expected to be short and uncomplicated. Prospective multi-site studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Foreign body within the upper esophagus of a patient not consenting to surgical treatment – case report and legal proceedings in light of current case law

&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Patients intentionally inserting foreign bodies into the lumen of their gastrointestinal tract usually aim at achieving certain benefits, such as postponement or avoidance of punishment.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; In view of the ever-increasing number of proceedings (including criminal proceedings) against health care professionals, the authors carried out a review of the available literature on: medical actions undertaken in cases of foreign bodies within the esophagus, current legislation and jurisprudence as practiced in the Republic of Poland within the context of model legal proceedings in cases involving patients raising doubts about being fully conscious and not consenting to necessary treatment.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Case report:&lt;/b&gt; The article presents a case of a patient with an esophageal foreign body who had not consented to the proposed surgical treatment. Doubts as raised within the otorhinolaryngological team with regard to the patient’s state of consciousness were not dispelled as the result of psychiatric consultation. Following a meticulous analysis of the current jurisprudence of the Polish judicial system and obtaining a court’s permission to intervene, the procedure (esophagoscopy with removal of esophageal foreign body) was performed. After exclusion of any life-threatening complications, the patient was transferred to the Psychiatric Department.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; In the current state of the law, performing a procedure to remove a foreign body from the esophagus without prior court approval could qualify as a violation of patient’s rights. In such case, legal liability of the physician would arise regardless of the fact that the patient would have received care in accordance with the current medical knowledge and practice.&lt;/br&gt;

Endoscopic removal of esophageal foreign body and endoscopic closure of its associated perforation with early mediastinitis.

A 55-year-old male swallowed fish bone accidentally and subsequently developed retrosternal pain. He underwent chest computed tomography at his local hospital on October 23, 2023, showing esophageal foreign body with suspected esophageal rupture. One day later, he underwent endoscopy at our department, showing a fish bone penetrated into the esophageal wall. After consultation with cardiothoracic surgeons, endoscopy-guided removal of this foreign body was performed under anesthesia. An esophageal ulcer with a length of 2cm was left with overflowing air bubbles, and was closed by three metal clips. Two days later, retrosternal pain disappeared. A tube was intubated to duodenal distal segment under endoscopy, via which enteral nutritional suspension was given. Then, he was discharged.

Balloon-assisted technique for endoscopic en bloc retrieval of a large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor specimen.

A 64-year-old woman underwent gastroscopy and abdominal computed tomography, which revealed a 4.0 × 3.5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the anterior wall of the stomach ([Fig. 1 a]). After full evaluation, an endoscopic full-thickness resection technique was used to achieve complete resection ([Fig. 1 b]). It is very important to retrieve the complete specimen to allow for subsequent pathological evaluation; however, retrieval is difficult for specimen larger than 3.5 cm. Wu et al. successfully applied a balloon-assisted technique for removal of large esophageal foreign bodies [1]. Therefore, we applied this technique for endoscopic en bloc retrieval of a large gastric GIST specimen ([Video 1]).

Esophageal Foreign Body Removal by Bile Duct Stone Removal Baskets (Litho crush): Think out of the Box; A Case Report

Abstract: A foreign body or food bolus impaction in the gastrointestinal tract is a common occurrence in emergency endoscopy. In 80-90% of patients, the foreign body will pass spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract without complications, and in 10-20% of the patients, an endoscopic or surgical intervention is deemed necessary. We report an unusual case of a foreign body, a large mango seed, that was stuck at the level of the mid-esophagus and was refractory to removal by standard endoscopic techniques.

Endoscopic esophageal foreign body removal among children at Lubaga Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy involves examination of the lining of the esophagus, stomach and part of the duodenum. Interventional endoscopy in addition to evaluating the upper gastrointestinal tract to make a diagnosis, also offers a treatment benefit. Traditionally, esophageal foreign bodies (FBs) in Uganda were removed using rigid endoscopy. We therefore report an emerging trend of using flexible endoscopy to remove these FBs. To describe participant characteristics and endoscopic findings among children who underwent esophageal FB removal in Lubaga Hospital in Kampala. This was a retrospective review of endoscopy reports for children who underwent endoscopic esophageal FB removal at Lubaga Hospital from December 2014 to March 2022. Overall, 61 symptomatic children underwent this procedure. The majority of the FBs were removed by flexible endoscopy (n=55, 90.16%). The mean age of the participants was 7.88 (SD=2.12) years old. The majority of the children were females (72.13%) and coins were the most ingested FBs (84%), others included steel crucifix, nails etc. The upper esophageal sphincter was the commonest site for FB impaction (74%). We report high success rates of 90.16% for endoscopic removal of impacted esophageal foreign bodies among Ugandan children using the now widely available flexible endoscopy.

Use of accessory devices in the endoscopic removal of esophageal foreign bodies

Background/Aims: The accessory devices used for esophageal foreign body removal have not been thoroughly investigated. This study investigated the appropriate use of endoscopic accessory devices for removing esophageal foreign bodies

Epidemiologic Burden and Projections for Eosinophilic Esophagitis–Associated Emergency Department Visits in the United States: 2009-2030

Patients with poorly controlled eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may require unplanned emergency department (ED) visits for the management of dysphagia or food impactions. We evaluated the epidemiologic burden of EoE on ED utilization in the United States. Data from the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample were used to estimate weighted annual EoE-associated ED visits from 2009-2019. Temporal trends in population-adjusted rates of EoE visits were assessed using joinpoint regression. Autoregressive integrated moving average models were used to project EoE-associated ED visits to 2030. We also evaluated endoscopic utilization, requirement for hospitalization, and ED-related charges in patients with EoE presenting to ED. A total of 11,125 unweighted (49,507 weighted) ED visits for EoE were included (69.0% male, mean age 32.4 years). The annual volume of EoE-associated ED visits increased from 2,934 [95% CI: 2,437-3,431] in 2009 to 8,765 [95% CI: 7,514-10,015] in 2019 and is projected to reach 15,445 [95% prediction interval PI: 14,672-16,218] by 2030. From 2009 to 2019, the number of EoE-associated ED visits increased by an average of 11.5%/year [95% CI: 10.3%, 12.7%]. The proportion of patients admitted to hospital from ED decreased from 25.6% in 2009-2011 to 14.0% in 2017-2019. Half of EoE patients presenting to ED required endoscopy, and nearly 40% required esophageal foreign body removal. Total mean inflation-adjusted charges for an EoE-associated ED visit were $9,025 US dollars in 2019. The volume of EoE-associated ED visits tripled between 2009 to 2019 and is projected to further double by 2030. This represents a substantial burden of unanticipated healthcare resource utilization and highlights a potential opportunity to optimize outpatient EoE care.

Efficacy and Safety of Cap Assisted vs. Conventional Endoscopic Esophageal Foreign Body Removal -

Please view the PDF to see the formatted meeting abstract.&#x0D;

Upper Aerodigestive Tract Procedures in COVID-19 Pandemic

Since the late 2019 months’ pandemic of Corona Virus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), it has spread globally and claimed abundant lives due to its expeditious interpersonal transmission and high mortality rate. Early studies showed that the upper aerodigestive tract procedures had the highest rates of nosocomial spread due to high viral load in upper respiratory and pharyngeal secretions. Between March 10 and April 10, 2020, a total of 28 rigid endoscopies were performed under general anesthesia for the removal of esophageal foreign bodies at our center. All the patients were screened on admission for symptoms of COVID-19 and a chest CT scan was performed and they were later followed up for further investigations. No patient had symptoms of COVID-19 (fever, cough, and dyspnea) on admission, and only one patient (3.57 %) had a suspicious CT scan for COVID-19. The mean age of 27 asymptomatic cases, including 14 men and 13 women, was 45.2 years old. Their average hospital stay was 0.8 days. all patients were later interviewed, inspected, and closely observed for any upcoming symptoms which would raise suspicion for COVID-19 during isolation. Of the 27 patients who cooperated, none showed COVID-19 symptoms. What makes this experiment prominent is that with suitable plans in a careful and precautionary manner, we can provide first-rate care for patients and meanwhile protect physicians during this pandemic promptly.

FLEXIBLE VERSUS RIGID ESOPHAGOSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL FOREIGN BODY IMPACTION

Background: Foreign body(FB) impaction accounts for 4% of emergency endoscopies in clinical practice. Flexible endoscopy(FE) is a recommended therapeutic option because it can be performed under local anesthesia, it is cost effective and is well tolerated. Rigid endoscopy (RG) under general anesthesia is another option and is advantageous in some circumstances. The aim of the study is to compare efcacy and safety of exible and rigid esophagoscopy in esophageal foreign body removal. Methods: It is a prospective study done in E.N.T department in KIMS MEDICAL COLLEGE, Amalapuram, which includes 50 patients with impacted foreign body esophagus. Parameters like type of foreign body, location of impacted foreign body are included. The study analyzies the type of procedure the patient have undergone, the intra operative and post operative complications. Results: This prospective cohort study includes 50 patients who have undergone surgical procedure for removal of impacted foreign body. Flexible esophagoscopy is performed in 30 patients and rigid esophagoscopy is performed in 20 patients . The most frequent complications are mucosal erosion, mucosal edema, and ulceration. Conclusion: Flexible esophagoscopy and rigid esophagoscopy are equally safe and effective for removal of impacted esophageal foreign body.

THRIVE In Elderly Patients Undergoing Esophageal Foreign Body Removal Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Case Series

THRIVE In Elderly Patients Undergoing Esophageal Foreign Body Removal Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Case Series

The role of point-of-care ultrasonography in esophageal foreign body removal.

Figure S1 Video S1 Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

The Use of Intravenous Nitroglycerin During Endoscopic Removal of Sharp Esophageal Foreign Body: A Case Report

Background: Esophageal spasm is a common problem after Foreign Body Ingestion (FBI) and causes difficulties for foreign bodies’ removal by endoscopic intervention. Sometimes, medication may help relieve spasms and facilitate the removal of a foreign body. In the current study, we introduce a patient with esophageal spasm due to FBI for whom intravenous nitroglycerin was used to treat the spasm.&#x0D; Methods: The patient was a 48-year-old man who was admitted to emergency department of Shohadaye Tajrish academic Hospital, Tehran, Iran due to FBI and following sever mid-anterior neck pain, nausea and drooling. His vital signs were normal and during endoscopic procedure, we noticed a sharp object attached to the wall of the upper third of the esophagus, causing severe spasm. After trying for an hour to remove the glass under general anesthesia, we were not able to remove it. Finally, intravenous nitroglycerin was used to relieve the spasm and it was easily removed after 2 minutes.&#x0D; Conclusion: Due to inconsistencies in the clinical results of nitroglycerin, and as notable lack of studies are investigating the effectiveness of the intravenous method, we aimed to share our successful experience.

Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Esophageal Foreign Body Removal Is Safe and Efficacious Compared to Conventional Methods.

Esophageal foreign body impaction (FBI) is a commonly encountered gastrointestinal emergency requiring immediate intervention. Foreign bodies can be composed of food, commonly referred to as a "food bolus" (FB), or other matter (non-food). We aim to conduct systematic review and meta-analysis to compare cap-assisted and conventional endoscopic techniques for removal of esophageal FBI. A comprehensive search technique was utilized to identify studies that used capped endoscopic devices to remove FB or other esophageal foreign bodies. The primary outcomes were the technical success rate, rate of en bloc retrieval, and procedure time. Secondary outcomes were overall adverse events, bleeding, mucosal tears, and perforation. Seven studies with a total of 1407 patients were included. The mean patient age was 55.3 (SD ± 7.2) years and 44.8% of patients were male. There were two RCTs and five observational studies among the included studies. The technical success rate was significantly higher in the cap-assisted group compared to the conventional group (OR 3.47, CI 1.68-7.168, I2 = 0%, p = < 0.001), as well as the en bloc retrieval rate (OR 26.90, CI 17.82-40.60, I2 = 0%, p = 0.001). There was a trend towards lower procedural time for the cap-assisted group compared to the conventional group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (MD -10.997, CI -22.78-0.786, I2 = 99.9%, p = 0.06). The overall adverse events were significantly lower in the cap-assisted group compared to the conventional group (OR 0.118, CI 0.018-0.792, I2 = 81.79%, p = 0.02). The cap-assisted technique has improved efficacy and safety. To confirm these results, larger randomized trials are warranted.

S593 Cap-Assisted Endoscopy for Esophageal Foreign Bodies: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Cap-assisted endoscopy has gained popularity as an alternative to the conventional endoscopy techniques of pushing to the stomach or piecemeal removal via mouth of esophageal foreign bodies. We investigated the effectiveness of cap-assisted endoscopy with conventional endoscopy. Methods: We reviewed several databases from inception to December 2021 to extract studies that compared the effectiveness of cap-assisted endoscopy to conventional endoscopy for removal of esophageal foreign body. Our outcomes of interest were procedure time, time of foreign body retrieval, technical success of the procedure, adverse event rate, and en bloc removal of foreign body. Analysis was performed by calculating odds ratio or mean difference using the random effects model. Results: Six studies were included in our meta-analysis (n=1,305). Cap-assisted endoscopy demonstrated higher odds of technical success (OR 3.23; 95% CI: 1.53-6.81; p=0.002), and en bloc removal (OR 26.23; 95% CI: 17.41-39.52; p< 0.01) as compared to conventional technique. Furthermore, cap-assisted endoscopy showed decreased odds of adverse events (OR 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06-0.81; p=0.02) and mean time of foreign body removal (MD -11.8 minutes; 95% CI: -18.64 to -4.95; p< 0.01) as compared to conventional technique. Conclusion: Cap-assisted endoscopy has higher rates of technical success and en bloc removal with reduction in adverse events and time of foreign body retrieval as compared to conventional technique. Cap-assisted endoscopy should be considered as a potential first-line option for esophageal foreign bodies.

Salvaged, Staged, and Safer Management of Aortoesophageal Fistula and Mediastinitis After Removing a Pork Bone: A Case Report

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) caused by esophageal foreign body (EFB) ingestion is a life-threatening condition with a very low survival rate. However, the optimal management strategy remains undetermined. Here, we describe our successful management of a patient with AEF and mediastinitis. A 36-year-old man developed persistent chest and back pain and vomited fresh blood three days after removal of a pork bone in the esophagus under endoscopy in a local hospital. Computed tomography (CT) confirmed bilateral pulmonary infections, mediastinitis, and fistula of the aortic arch. After a multidiscipline discussion, a comprehensive staged strategy was made including salvaged thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to control fatal bleeding, adequate mediastinal debridement, drainage with cervical incision, and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, as well as jejunostomy to prevent nasal or gastrostomy reflux from aggravating the mediastinal infection. Furthermore, systematic personalized nutrition support and antibiotics were provided. The patient recovered well and has survived for 50 months until now. Careful assessment should be made with CT to ascertain the risk of AEF before and after the removal of EFB. A salvaged staged strategy of TEVAR with adequate mediastinal debridement and drainage in a less invasive approach may be a safer alternative for AEF patients with infections caused by EFB.

A Case of Migrated Esophageal Foreign Body Removal Through Cervical Approach Under C-Arm Fluoroscopic Guidance

Foreign bodies in the upper airway and the esophagus are common and often removed in the outpatient setting using the rigid or flexible laryngoscope. Although most esophageal foreign bodies are removed from the digestive tract, in some cases, surgical intervention is required due to its difficult location. Esophageal foreign bodies often removed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy, but when they penetrate the esophagus and move to deep neck spaces, other approaches should be taken into consideration. We report a rare case of a 13-year-old patient whose esophageal foreign body moved to a deep neck compartment, which was embedded in the anterior vertebral muscle. We decided to perform neck exploration under C-arm guidance, successfully targeted and removed the foreign body.

Emergent Endoscopy for Esophageal Foreign Body Removal: The Impact of Location.

BackgroundTimely intervention is essential for the successful removal of ingested foreign bodies. Emergent endoscopy (EGD) is usually performed in the emergency department (ED), operating room (OR), intensive care unit (ICU), or endoscopy suite. However, because the endoscopy suite is not always available, this study investigated the impact of location outside of the endoscopy suite on the successful removal of ingested foreign bodies and other patient outcomes.MethodologyWe reviewed charts of patients who underwent EGD for foreign body removal at an academic quaternary center between January 01, 2012, and December 31, 2020. We defined successful EGD as retrieval of the foreign body at the first attempt and not requiring subsequent endoscopy or surgical intervention. We performed descriptive and inferential statistical analyses and conducted classification and regression trees to compare endoscopy procedure length (EPL) and hospital length of stay (HLOS) between different locations.ResultsWe analyzed 77 patients, of whom 13 (17%) underwent endoscopy in the ICU, 46 (60%) in the OR, and 18 (23%) in the ED. Endoscopic removal failed in four (5%) patients. Endoscopy length was significantly shorter in the OR (67 (48-122) minutes) versus the ICU (158 (95-166) minutes, P = 0.004) and the ED (111 (92-155) minutes, P = 0.009). Time to procedure was similar if the procedure was performed in the ED (278 minutes), the ICU (331 minutes), or the OR (378 minutes). The median (interquartile range) of HLOS for the OR group (0.87 (0.54-2.03) days) was significantly shorter than the ICU group (2.26 (1.47-6.91) days, P = 0.007).ConclusionsWhile performing endoscopy for esophageal foreign body removal in the OR may be associated with a shorter EPL and HLOS, no location was inferior for overall outcomes. Further prospective and randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings.

A Rare Complication of Foreign Body Removal from the Oesophagus Using Foley Catheter: Esophageal Rupture

Delay in diagnosis and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies (FBs) increases morbidity and mortality. Anamnesis, radiological imaging and endoscopy are important in this diagnosis. A nine-month-old male patient was admitted to the hospital an hour after swallowing a coin. Pulmonary radiographic images detected the FB in the 2nd narrowing of the oesophagus and the FB was removed using a foley catheter. Six hours after removal of the FB, the patient was re-admitted by the emergency service upon development of puffiness in the neck and chest area. Physical examination revealed subcutaneous crepitation on the anterior wall of the thorax. Esophagography revealed that the contrast agent leaked from the right lateral of the oesophagus into the chest cavity. The nasogastric tube was inserted, the oral nutrition was stopped and antibiotherapy was started. Primary oesophagus repair was performed via thoracotomy on the 7th day of conservative follow-up upon the deterioration of the general condition and continuing leakage of contrast agent as observed in the fluoroscopy. In conclusion, The use of foley catheter in the removal of esophageal FBs can lead to serious complications.