Removal Of Common Bile Duct Stones Research Articles

A Hidden Cause of Hypertransaminasemia: Liver Toxicity Caused by Chelidonium Majus L.: Report of Two Cases of Herb-Induced Liver Injury and Literature Review.

In instances where individuals manifest elevated transaminase levels without a clearly discernible cause, a comprehensive patient history proves invaluable in unveiling latent triggers. In this report, we present 2 cases of herb-induced liver injury (HILI) characterized by severe hypertransaminasemia attributed to the consumption of Chelidonium majus L. (also known as greater celandine [GC]), an agent considered an alternative therapeutic remedy. Exploring the occurrence and range of clinical manifestations in HILI linked to Chelidonium majus L., while also investigating the potential triggers and predisposing factors for hepatotoxic reactions post Chelidonium majus L. usage, remains challenging due to the absence of definitive laboratory tests to identify the causative agent. Two case reports were detailed, and a systematic literature review using PubMed was conducted including published literature till March 2023. Moreover, a manual search of reference lists of pertinent articles was performed to identify any additional relevant missed publications. In the first case, a 64-year-old woman presented with jaundice, revealing a 1-month history of using GC capsules to manage gallstones. Diagnostic assessment identified HILI, gallstones, and choledocolithiasis, with transaminase levels exceeding 1000 IU/L. After discontinuing GC and receiving intravenous therapy with amino acids and phospholipids, the patient's condition significantly improved. Subsequently, she underwent endoscopic common bile duct stone removal and cholecystectomy. In the second case, a 66-year-old woman presented with elevated liver function test results discovered incidentally during musculoskeletal pain evaluation. Upon further questioning, the patient disclosed regular consumption of GC tea for "health promotion." Following intravenous therapy using amino acids and phospholipids, her transaminase levels returned to normal. The literature review identified 38 cases of HILI associated with GC preparations, primarily in adult women aged 27-77 years, with a predominant reporting location in Germany. Various forms of GC were used, with treatment durations ranging from 1 week to a year. Discontinuation of GC generally led to recovery in these cases. Chelidonium majus L., a potent herb often used in alternative medicine, has significant hepatotoxic potential, requiring physicians to be vigilant in cases of unexplained liver injury.

Antegrade balloon dilatation of the duodenal papilla during laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with acute choledocholithiasis: a case control matched study

IntroductionIn acute obstructive common bile duct (CBD) stones endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for CBD stone removal before cholecystectomy (ChE) (‘ERC-first’) is the gold standard of treatment. Intraoperative antegrade balloon dilatation of the duodenal papilla during ChE with flushing of CBD stones to the duodenum (‘ABD-during-ChE’) may be an alternative ‘one-stop-shop’ treatment option. However, a comparison of outcomes of the ‘ABD-during-ChE’ technique and the’ERC-first’ approach has never been performed.MethodsRetrospective case control matched study of patients suffering from obstructive CBD stones (< 8 mm) without severe pancreatitis or cholangitis that underwent the traditional ‘ERC-first’ approach versus the ‘ABD-during-ChE’ technique. Primary endpoint was the overall Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) from diagnosis to complete CBD stone removal and performed ChE.ResultsA total of 70 patients were included (35 patients each in the ‘ERC first’- and ‘ABD-during-ChE’-group). There were no statistical significant differences in terms of demographics and disease specific characteristics between the two study groups. However, there was a not significant difference towards an increased overall CCI® in the ‘ERC-first’ group versus the ‘ABD-during-ChE’ group (14.4 ± 15.4 versus 9.8 ± 11.1, p = 0.225). Of note, six major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa) occurred in the ‘ERC-first’ group versus two in the ‘ABD-during-ChE’ group (17% versus 6%, p = 0.136). In addition, significantly more interventions and a longer overall time from diagnosis to complete clearance of bile ducts and performed ChE was found, when comparing the ‘ERC-first’ group and the ‘ABD-during-ChE’ group (3.7 ± 0.8 versus 1.1 ± 0.4, p < 0.001; 160.5 ± 228.6 days versus 12.0 ± 18.0 days, p < 0.001).ConclusionIn patients suffering from acute obstructive CBD stones smaller than 8 mm, compared to the ‘ERC-first’ approach, the ‘ABD-during-ChE’ technique resulted in significantly less interventions and reduced overall treatment time from diagnosis to complete clearance of bile ducts and performed ChE. This comes together with a strong trend of less intervention related complications in the ‘ABD-during-ChE’ group.

Laparoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transcystic Approach for the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones.

Background: The treatment of choledocholithiasis with nondilated common bile duct (CBD) is a challenge for surgeons who often choose endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) staging surgery instead of simultaneous laparoscopic CBD exploration with LC because of the small CBD diameter. This study aims to introduce and assess the clinical applicability of a technique we developed to identify and extract CBD stones using laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed surgical procedures and clinical data of 13 patients who underwent LC and CBD exploration using LUS between May 2022 and August 2023. The cystic duct was used for CBD stone removal. Results: Ten patients were successfully treated; 2 patients with residual stones were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid, whereas 1 patient required a microincision near the CBD and choledochoscopy because of stone incarceration in the duodenal papilla. The CBD diameter was 6 mm (5-9 mm). There were less than three CBD stones, with diameters of 2-6 mm; the median operative time was 105 minutes (range, 52-155 minutes). One patient developed postoperative cholangitis. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (3-8 days). The stone clearance rate was 76.9%, and the CBD stone detection rate was 100%. No intraoperative complications, postoperative bile leakage, and mortality occurred. Conclusions: CBD exploration and transcystic stone extraction under LUS guidance are safe and effective approaches for patients with choledocholithiasis; strict control over surgical indications is necessary. This study could provide new strategies for effectively treating choledocholithiasis.

Case Series of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Children with Common Bile Duct Stones and a Review of the Literature.

Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been employed for the endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDSs) and has been reported to have a high success rate for stone removal. However, EST is associated with a risk of bleeding, perforation, and sphincter of Oddi function disruption. To avoid these risks, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is an option for CBDS. Sphincter of Oddi function preservation decreases long-term biliary infection and gallstone recurrence. EPBD may have advantages in children who require a long follow up. However, there have been few reports on pediatric cases, particularly in infants. Methods: From September 2017 to December 2023, we performed EPBD for four pediatric CBDSs. The patients were aged from 5 months to 8 years, including two infants aged 5 and 6 months. Furthermore, we reviewed the stone removal rate and complications of 545 ESTs performed at high-volume centers and 13 EPBD-reported cases in children with CBDSs. Results: CBDSs of all patients who underwent EPBD in our institution were successfully removed. No bleeding or perforation was noted; pancreatitis was observed in three patients. In an analysis of 545 ESTs in children, the stone removal rate was high, ranging from 83% to 100% (mean 96%). The incidence of pancreatitis was 0-9.6% (mean 4.4%), and the grade of pancreatitis was almost mild. The bleeding frequency was 1.3-5.4% (mean 2.7%). With regards to the grade of bleeding, seven cases were mild (64%) and four were moderate (36%). Compared with adults who underwent EST, the frequencies of pancreatitis and bleeding were almost equal in children; however, in children, once bleeding occurs, it has a higher risk of leading to blood transfusion. Stone removal via EPBD in children has a 100% success rate. Pancreatitis was responsible for all complications were related; its frequency was 46% (6/13 patients, including five mild cases and one moderate case), which is higher than that of EST and adult cases who underwent EPBD. In most children with pancreatitis, pancreatic enzyme levels returned to normal within 2-3 days following EPBD, and no severe cases caused by EPBD were reported. Conclusions: CBDS removal via EPBD in children has a high success rate with very low risk of bleeding and perforation. Although pancreatitis frequently occurs, most cases are mild. Sphincter of Oddi function preservation via EPBD is expected to prevent long-term stone recurrence and biliary tract infection, and EPBD is considered to be an effective method for CBDS removal in children.

Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Removal of Common Bile Duct Stones: An Update in Chinese Patients with Choledocholithiasis

Aim: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been widely used in endoscopic surgery for many biliary and pancreatic diseases. Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication that occurs, even with expert surgeons. However, few reports have addressed the risk of PEP by focusing on the removal of Common Bile Duct Stones (CBDS). Methods: To detect potential risk factors for PEP after endoscopic removal of CBDS, the medical records of CBDS patients who received ERCP procedures at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 2021 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient- and procedure-related data were collected, and PEP was reevaluated. Single- and multiplevariable analyses were conducted to identify potential risk factors. Results: A total of 1,251 procedures were performed in 1,173 patients and PEP occurred in 84 cases (6.71%). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that female sex (P= 0.049, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.002-2.521), cerebral infarction (P=0.011, 95% CI: 1.197-3.964), acute pancreatitis history (P=0.001, 95% CI: 2.436-7.249), fatty liver disease (P=0.021, 95% CI: 1.140 -4.843), common bile duct diameter &lt;10 mm (P=0.005, 95% CI: 1.299-4.313), and Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation (EBD) (P=0.01, 95% CI: 0.321-0.855) were independent risk factors for PEP in CBDS patients. Conclusion: Female sex, a history of Fatty Liver Disease (FLD), previous acute pancreatitis, and common bile duct stenosis are risk factors for PEP, whereas EPBD is a protective factor for PEP in patients with CBDS, which should be considered by clinicians.

Preventive Saline Irrigation of the Bile Duct to Reduce the Rate of Residual Common Bile Duct Stones Without Intraductal Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been proven efficacious in the removal of CBD stones. Even after endoscopic stone removal, recurring cholangitis due to a residual common bile duct (CBD) stone is prevalent in clinical practice with a residual recurrence rate of 4-24% after successful stone retrieval. This comprehensive study and meta-analysis aimed to determine if preventive saline irrigation of the bile duct (PSIB) reduces the amount of residual CBD stones. Through a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until November 20, 2022, we identified 164 articles comparing the efficacy of PSIB and non-PSIB post-endoscopic CBD stone removal. After stringent selection, three studies were included for meta-analysis using ReviewManager (ReVman version 5.4.1; Cochrane, London, UK). Using a random effect (RE) model, we derived a pooled odds ratio (OR) with confidence interval (CI) (95%CI). A total of three studies have been included in the analysis. Out of which, two are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one is a non-randomized study. Out of 323 patients, 157 underwent PSIB after an endoscopic stone removal of CBD stones to reduce the residual of CBD stones, whereas 166 did not undergo saline irrigation (non-PSIB). In our analysis, PSIB significantly reduced the risk of residual stones (OR: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.11-0.45). However, there was no notable link between PSIB and post-irrigation cholangitis (OR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.21-2.21). Although not statistically significant, PSIB showed a trend toward lowered risks of post-procedural pancreatitis (OR: 0.65), bleeding (OR: 0.68), and other complications (OR: 0.64). PSIB effectively reduces residual CBD stones after endoscopy, offering a cost-effective alternative to invasive procedures such as intraductal ultrasound (IDUS). However, larger RCTs are needed to validate its definitive role.

Comparison of Outcomes between a Basket Catheter and a Balloon Catheter for Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Removal

Introduction: Evidence for the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between a basket catheter and a balloon catheter for endoscopic common bile duct stone (CBDS) removal is lacking. This study aimed to compare ERCP outcomes using a basket catheter and a balloon catheter for endoscopic CBDS removal. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 904 consecutive patients with native papilla who underwent endoscopic stone removal for CBDS ≤10 mm using a basket catheter and/or a balloon catheter at three institutions in Japan. ERCP outcomes between the basket and balloon groups were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. Results: ERCP-related adverse events occurred in 6.5% (29/449) and 7.7% (35/455) of patients in the basket and balloon groups, respectively (IPTW-adjusted p = 0.52). The incidences of post-ERCP pancreatitis, cholangitis, and perforation were similar in the basket and balloon groups (3.8% vs. 2.9%, 1.3% vs. 0.9%, and 0.7% vs. 0.7%, respectively). However, bleeding incidences were significantly higher in the balloon group than in the basket group (3.3% vs. 0.7%, IPTW-adjusted p = 0.012). Successful complete stone removal at one ERCP session using a single catheter was achieved in 17.8% (80/449) in the basket group and in 81.3% (370/455) in the balloon group (IPTW-adjusted p < 0.001). Discussion: A balloon catheter is more likely to complete stone extraction for CBDS ≤10 mm with a single catheter at one endoscopic stone removal session. However, the risk for post-ERCP bleeding is higher in the balloon group than in the basket group.

ERCP using balloon-assisted endoscopes versus EUS-guided treatment for common bile duct stones in Roux-en-Y gastrectomy

To compare endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using balloon-assisted endoscope (BE-ERCP) with endoscopic ultrasonography-guided antegrade treatment (EUS-AG) for removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) gastrectomy. Consecutive patients with R-Y gastrectomy undergoing BE-ERCP or EUS-AG for CBD stones in 16 centers were retrospectively analyzed. BE-ERCP and EUS-AG were performed in 588 and 59 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for CBD diameter and angle. Technical success rate was 83.7% vs. 83.1% (P = 0.956), complete stone removal rate was 78.1% vs. 67.8% (P = 0.102), and early adverse event rate was 10.2% vs. 18.6% (P = 0.076) in BE-ERCP and EUS-AG. The mean number of endoscopic sessions was smaller in BE-ERCP (1.5±0.8 vs. 1.9±1.0 sessions, P = 0.01), whereas the median total treatment time was longer (90 vs. 61.5 minutes, P = 0.001). Among patients with biliary access, complete stone removal rate was significantly higher in BE-ERCP (93.3% vs. 81.6%, P = 0.009). CBD diameter ≥15-mm (Odds ratio [OR], 0.41) and an angle of CBD <90-degree (OR, 0.39) were negative predictive factors in BE-ERCP, and a stone size ≥10-mm (OR, 0.07) and an angle of CBD <90-degree (OR, 0.07) in EUS-AG. The 1-year recurrence rate was 8.3% in both groups. Effectiveness and safety of BE-ERCP and EUS-AG were comparable in CBD stone removal for patients after R-Y gastrectomy, but complete stone removal after technical success was superior in BE-ERCP.

Effectiveness and complication rates of percutaneous transhepatic fluoroscopy-guided management of common bile duct stones: a single-arm meta-analysis.

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the success and complication rate of percutaneous transhepatic fluoroscopy-guided management (PTFM) for the removal of common bile duct stones (CBDS). A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases was conducted to identify original articles published between January 2010 and June 2022, reporting the success rate of PTFM for the removal of CBDS. A random-effect model was used to summarize the pooled rates of success and complications with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eighteen studies involving 2554 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Failed or infeasible endoscopic management was the most common indication of PTFM. The meta-analytic summary estimates of PTFM for the removal of CBDS were as follows: rate of overall stone clearance 97.1% (95% CI, 95.7-98.5%); stone clearance at first attempt 80.5% (95% CI, 72.3-88.6%); overall complications 13.8% (95% CI, 9.7-18.0%); major complications 2.8% (95% CI, 1.4-4.2%); and minor complications 9.3% (95% CI, 5.7-12.8%). Egger's tests showed the presence of publication bias with respect to the overall complications (p = 0.049). Transcholecystic management of CBDS had an 88.5% pooled rate for overall stone clearance (95% CI, 81.2-95.7%), with a 23.0% rate for complications (95% CI, 5.7-40.4%). The systematic review and meta-analysis answer the questions of the overall stone clearance, clearance at first attempt, and complication rate of PTFM by summarizing the available literature. Percutaneous management could be considered in cases with failed or infeasible endoscopic management of CBDS. This meta-analysis highlights the excellent stone clearance rate achieved through percutaneous transhepatic fluoroscopy-guided removal of common bile duct stones, potentially influencing clinical decision-making when endoscopic treatment is not feasible. • Percutaneous transhepatic fluoroscopy-guided management of common bile duct stones had a pooled rate of 97.1% for overall stone clearance and 80.5% for clearance at the first attempt. • Percutaneous transhepatic management of common bile duct stones had an overall complication rate of 13.8%, including a major complication rate of 2.8%. • Percutaneous transcholecystic management of common bile duct stones had an overall stone clearance rate of 88.5% and a complication rate of 23.0%.

Endoscopic clearance of non-complex biliary stones using fluoroscopy-free direct solitary cholangioscopy: Initial multicenter experience.

Fluoroscopy-free endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance is usually offered only to pregnant patients. We initiated a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing clearance of non-complex CBDSs using fluoroscopy-free direct solitary cholangioscopy (DSC) to standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) to evaluate the wider applicability of the DSC-based approach. Here we report the initial results of stone clearance and safety in roll-in cases for the randomized controlled trial. Twelve expert endoscopists at tertiary care centers in four countries prospectively enrolled 47 patients with non-complex CBDSs for DSC-assisted CBDS removal in an index procedure including fluoroscopy-free cannulation. Successful CBDS clearance was first determined by DSC and subsequently validated by final occlusion cholangiogram as the ERC gold standard. Fully fluoroscopy-free cannulation was successful in 42/47 (89.4%) patients. Brief fluoroscopy with minimal contrast injection was used in 4/47 (8.5%) patients during cannulation. Cannulation failed in 1/47 (2.1%) patients. Fluoroscopy-free complete stone clearance was reached in 38/46 (82.6%) cases. Residual stones were detected in the validation ERC occlusion cholangiogram in three cases. Overall serious adverse event rate was 2.1% (95% confidence interval 0.1-11.3): postprocedural pancreatitis in one patient. In patients with non-complex CBDS, the fluoroscopy-free technique is easily transferred to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography experts with acceptable rates of cannulation and stone clearance and few serious adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03421340).

Predictors of technical success of percutaneous transhepatic common bile duct stone removal: is it only a matter of stone size?

The common practice is to remove symptomatic common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the percutaneous transhepatic removal of CBD stones. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 100 patients (66 men and 34 women; age: 25-105years, mean 79.1years) with symptomatic CBD stones who underwent percutaneous transhepatic stone removal (PTSR) from January 2010 through October 2019. After balloon dilation of the ampulla of Vater or bilioenteric anastomosis, the stones were pushed out of the CBD into the small bowel with a balloon catheter. If failed, basket lithotripsy was performed. Technical success was defined as complete clearance of the bile ducts on a cholangiogram. The technical success rate was 83%, and achieved 90.2% in patients with altered gastroduodenal/pancreatobiliary anatomy. Multivariable analysis revealed that CBD diameter (odds ratio [OR]: 506.460, p = 0.015), failed ERCP (OR: 16.509, p = 0.004), Tokyo guidelines TG18/TG13 severity (grade III; OR: 60.467, p = 0.006), and left-sided transhepatic approach (OR: 21.621, p = 0.012) were risk factors for technical failure. The appropriate cutoff CBD size was 15.5mm (area under the curve: 0.91). CBD stone size, radiopacity of stones, and CBD angle between retroduodenal and pancreatic portion did not influence technical success. PTSR is effective for CBD stone removal in older adults and individuals with altered gastrointestinal tract anatomy. The aforementioned risk factors for technical failure should be considered in preoperative evaluation before PTSR to improve the success rate. • PTSR is effective in symptomatic CBD stone management among older adults and individuals with altered anatomy. Investigating clinical /anatomic factors can guide radiologists toward a more comprehensive preoperative evaluation to maximize the success rate. • Our data indicate that dilated CBD (diameter ≥ 15.5mm) and left-sided PTBDs reduce the technical success rate by 506-fold and 22-fold, respectively. • Clinical factors such as previous failed ERCP for stone removal and higher severity of acute cholangitis lessen the technical success rate.

Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in nonagenarians: a tertiary centre experience.

There are few studies assessed the efficacy and mortality of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones in the elderly aged ≥90 years. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic removal of CBD stones in nonagenarians. We retrospectively reviewed ERCP reports for CBD stone removal. The endoscopic and therapeutic outcomes were collected. The length of stay (LOS), the total number of adverse events, and mortality rate were compared between groups. A total of 125 nonagenarians were compared with 1,370 controls (65-89 years old individuals). The mean LOS for nonagenarians was significantly higher than in controls (13.6 days vs. 6.5 days). Completed intended treatment was similar in the nonagenarians and controls (89.8% and 89.5%, respectively). The overall complication rate did not differ between the groups. However, nonagenarians had a higher incidence of post-ERCP pneumonia (3.9%). None of the nonagenarians were readmitted to the hospital within 7 days. Four nonagenarians (3.2%) and 25 (1.8%) controls died within 30 days. Advanced age alone did not affect the decision to perform the procedure. However, prompt diagnosis and treatment of post-ERCP pneumonia in nonagenarians could improve the outcomes and reduce mortality.

Wait-and-see strategy is justified after ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in elderly patients with common biliary duct stones.

Older patients with simultaneous main bile duct and gallbladder stones, especially those with high-surgical risks, create a common clinical dilemma. After successful endoscopic removal of main bile duct stones, should these patients undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy to reduce risk of recurrent biliary events? In this population-based cohort study, we report long-term outcomes of a wait-and-see strategy after successful endoscopic extraction of main bile duct stones. Consecutive patients 75 years or older undergoing endoscopic stone extraction without subsequent cholecystectomy in two tertiary academic centers between January 2010 and December 2018 were included. Primary outcome measure was recurrence of biliary events. Secondary outcome measures were operation-related morbidity and mortality. A total of 450 patients (median age, 85 years; 61% female) were included, with a median follow-up time of 36 months (0-120 months). Recurrent biliary events occurred in 51 patients (11%), with a median time from index hospital admission to recurrence of 307 days (12-1993 days). The most common biliary event was acute cholecystitis (7.1%). Twelve patients had cholangitis (2.7%) and two biliary pancreatitis (0.4%). Only one patient (0.4%) underwent surgery due to later gallstone-related symptoms. Eighteen patients (4.0%) required endoscopic intervention and 16 (3.5%) underwent surgery. There were no operation-associated deaths or morbidity among those undergoing later surgical or endoscopic interventions. In elderly patients, it is relatively safe to leave gallbladder in situ after successful sphincterotomy and endoscopic common bile duct stone removal. In elderly and frail patients, a wait-and-see strategy without routine cholecystectomy rarely leads to clinically significant consequences. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

EGS P32V Laparoscopic transcystic Antegrade Biliary Stenting

Abstract Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis including pancreatitis. Symptomatic gall stones patients have up to 20% risk of having common bile duct (CBD) stones too. Although, guidelines have been laid down for management of suspected CBD stones, in practice there is a lot of variability and lack of standardisation. The waiting list for Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is long, resulting in delayed treatment and increased length of hospital stay. Similarly, pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can also increase the length of hospital stay due to long waiting lists, limited availability and overall risk of complications as high as 30%. Hence, the role of on-table cholangiogram (OTC) while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been explored. The guidelines state that OTC should be performed in fit for surgery patients, without pre-operative investigations for diagnosing CBD stones. We have been practising early cholecystectomy with on-table cholangiogram (during the index admission), with selective insertion of antegrade biliary stent in patients with choledocholithiasis. We facilitate ERCP with stent removal and clearance of CBD stones after 4 weeks post-operatively. We aim to present our technique of laparoscopic antegrade biliary stent insertion. Methods We follow the standard four-port technique for Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Following dissection of Calot's triangle and visualisation of ‘critical view of safety’, an on-table cholangiogram is performed using a standard technique. If CBD stones are visualised, a transcystic antegrade stenting is done by Seldinger technique (without clearing the CBD of stones). The cholangiogram catheter is removed and flex-tip ureteric catheter is inserted transcystically. Through the ureteric catheter a flex-tip guidewire is inserted into CBD till its tip is visualised in the duodenum, under C-arm guidance. The ureteral catheter is then withdrawn carefully with guidewire placed satisfactorily. A double pig tail end biliary stent is rail-roaded over the guidewire, using a pushing catheter fashioned appropriately. As soon as the tip of the stent is visualised beyond the ampulla (in the X-ray), the guidewire and pushing catheter are withdrawn. The curling up of both ends of the stent is visualised and confirmed through C-arm guidance. Thereafter the procedure of cholecystectomy, as standard, is completed. Results The results of this procedure were analysed from 2014 to 2017, and subsequently published in 2018. Conclusions This technique does not involve skills required for CBD exploration. Hence, can be performed by general surgeons with expertise in minimal access surgeries, as it does not involve a steep learning curve. This technique is safe, reliable and cost-effective. It also decreases delays in biliary decompression, in-hospital stay and ensures timely treatment.

OGBN P06 Expectant Management Following Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Choledocholithiasis: Is It Safe?

Abstract Background Gallstone disease is one of the most common gastrointestinal conditions in the UK. It is estimated that 10–15% of adults in the UK have gallstones. Most gallstones are found in the gallbladder but sometimes they can pass through the cystic duct into the common bile duct (CBD) causing choledocholithiasis. CBD stones may present with symptoms of jaundice, cholangitis, pancreatitis or be asymptomatic. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), first reported in 1974, is considered a safe and effective method for managing choledocholithiasis. A significant proportion of patients who undergo ES for symptomatic CBD stones are subsequently referred for cholecystectomy. However, it is unclear whether cholecystectomy itself is necessary after endoscopic CBD stone removal. Some studies recently have indicated that cholecystectomy may not always be needed following endoscopic duct clearance (expectant management), especially for patients that remain asymptomatic or decline surgery (due to frailty, significant comorbidities or patient choice). The primary aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients who had expectant management (EM) after endoscopic CBD stone removal. Methods We retrospectively analysed the records of patients who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in a UK District General Hospital between 01 January 2019 and 31 December 2019. Inclusion criteria were a) presence of CBD stones, and b) patients who underwent ERCP without prior cholecystectomy. The following patients were excluded: a) previous cholecystectomy, b) patients who underwent ERCP for other biliary pathologies, including malignancy. The original data set was obtained from the clinical coding department. ERCP reports, clinic letters, discharge summaries and the hospital results reporting systems were reviewed to extract patient data including demographics, comorbidities, management decision following ERCP, need for repeat ERCP and readmission rate. Results A total of 220 patients underwent ERCP in 2019. After excluding patients who did not fit the inclusion criteria,106 patients were included in this study. The median age was 75 years (22–97). 60 patients were women and 46 were men. Median follow up period was 36 months (30–42), excluding patients who died within the follow up period. 63 (59%) patients had a course of expectant management following ERCP for choledocholithiasis while 43 (41%) had a planned cholecystectomy (CS). Of the sixty-three patients who had EM, 40 were considered unfit for surgery, 18 were asymptomatic following ERCP, 3 did not wish to have surgery and the reason is unknown in 2. The median age for EM patients was 80 years (22–91), whereas the CS group had a median age of 62 years (25–82). In the EM group, 11 patients passed away within the follow-up period, none related to biliary pathology. Of the remaining 52 patients, only 1 proceeded to have cholecystectomy during the 3 year follow-up period due to multiple episodes of cholangitis. 2 out of 52 (4%) were readmitted with biliary complications but they continued to be managed conservatively due to frailty. Conclusions Endoscopic sphincterotomy and clearance of ductal stones followed by cholecystectomy is the most common treatment for choledocholithiasis. Recent NICE guidelines recommend CS for all patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic CBD stones. However, there is minimal evidence regarding the safety of leaving the gallbladder in situ after ES and thus the issue remains debatable. The majority of studies that have evaluated the complication rates of EM have focused only on elderly patients (age&amp;gt;80years), whereas our study has evaluated all patients after ERCP regardless of age and comorbidities. Pancreatitis did not occur during follow-up in any patients without cholecystectomy. This is in keeping with previous evidence as ES may in itself be definitive in prophylaxis against pancreatitis as it decreases the risk of pancreatic duct obstruction. The majority of patients (95%) with choledocholithiasis who did not undergo cholecystectomy after ERCP remained asymptomatic, indicating that expectant management is safe. However, we recognise this was a single centre study with limited patient numbers and medium-term follow-up. We suggest that future randomized controlled trials be multicentre and should include an assessment of patients’ quality of life and non-hospital managed symptoms.

Common bile duct stone-related parameters and their potential prognostic values for stone extraction requiring endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation.

For difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones, endoscopic sphincterotomy accompanied by endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) may be the preferred initial procedure according to the selection criteria. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between CBD stone-related parameters and their potential prognostic values for technically difficult CBD stone extraction requiring EPLBD. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 80 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, or the aforementioned procedures combined with EPLBD, resulting in successful CBD stone extraction in the first session from January 2018 and December 2021. The association between CBD stone-related parameters and stone extraction requiring EPLBD was analyzed by multivariable risk regression analysis. In multivariable analysis, the independent predictors of CBD stone extraction that required EPLBD were CBD stones larger than distal CBD diameterby >2 mm (risk ratio [RR] 2.34, 95% CI 1.30-4.19) and the presence of shaped stones (round shape RR 1.69 [95% CI 1.05-2.73]; square shape RR 2.34 [95% CI 1.24, 4.44] vs oval shape). Endoscopic CBD stone removal is technically difficult in patients with stones larger than 2 mm in diameter in comparison to the distal CBD diameter or round or square-shaped stones.

Routine preoperative MRCP in screening choledocholithiasis in acute cholecystitis compared to selective approach: a population-based study.

Choledocholithiasis is more common in acute cholecystitis than in elective situations. Preoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is essential to facilitate adequate planning of CBD (common bile duct) stone removal, preferably performed as a single-stage procedure. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of routine preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in acute cholecystitis followed by consequent cholecystectomy. A total of 180 consecutive patients operated for acute cholecystitis between January 2019 and December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative routine MRCP was performed for bile duct evaluation when feasible. The control cohort consisted of 180 consecutive patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy before the study period. Intraoperative cholangiography was used routinely in both groups when technically achievable. We examined the proportion of patients recruited in preoperative MRCP, possible time delay to MRCP and surgery, and the incidence of CBD stones compared to the control cohort. Routine MRCP in acute cholecystitis was achieved in 114/180 (63%) patients compared to 42/180 (23.3%) patients of the control group. The triage time from emergency to MRCP and the operating theatre was similar in both cohorts. The percentage of patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis in the study group was notably higher (almost 18% vs 11%), p < 0.05. After a median follow-up time of 2.5years in the study group and almost 4years in the control group, recurrent choledocholithiasis was not detected in either group. Routine MRCP in patients with acute cholecystitis can be implemented with a fair execution rate in a population-based setting with minor effects on hospital stay and delays but higher detection of choledocholithiasis. We observed no additional benefit compared to the selective use of MRCP. However, routine preoperative MRCP allows an advantage when considering the appropriate exploration method if choledocholithiasis is detected.

Outcomes following common bile duct exploration versus endoscopic stone extraction before, during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with common bile duct stones

BackgroundLaparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are two methods of retrieving common bile duct (CBD) stones. The best method for CBD stone removal is debatable. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes following LCBDE and/or ERCP, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MethodsData were collected retrospectively for patients undergoing LCBDE and/or ERCP at a single centre from 2008 to 2018. Patients were grouped by intention-to-treat (single-stage LCBDE, pre-operative-, intra-operative-, or post-operative ERCP) and eventual plan (surgical or endoscopic). Outcomes included complication rates (minor Clavien-Dindo 1/2, major Clavien-Dindo 3/4, non-biliary complications) and mortality. ResultsOf 671 patients, 578 patients received LCBDE and 93 patients received ERCP as primary care. Endoscopic clearance had significantly higher complications and mortality compared to surgical clearance. On an intention-to-treat basis LCBDE had the lowest minor-, major- and non-biliary complications, and mortality (5.2%, 6.1%, 2.9% and 0.5%, respectively), whilst pre-operative ERCP the worst (39.6%, 27.1%, 29.2% and 8.3%, respectively) (p=<0.001). LCBDE and postERCP had similar major complications and mortality. ConclusionSurgical clearance of CBD stones was potentially safer than endoscopic clearance. Pre-operative ERCP had the worst outcomes. LCBDE and postERCP are likely to have similar short-term patient outcomes.

Risk prediction of common bile duct stone recurrence based on new common bile duct morphological subtypes.

Stones in the common bile duct (CBD) are reported worldwide, and this condition is majorly managed through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). CBD stone recurrence is an important issue after endoscopic stone removal. Therefore, it is essential to identify its risk factors to determine the necessity of regular follow-up in patients who underwent endoscopic removal of CBD stones. The authors identified that the S and polyline morphological subtypes of CBD were associated with increased stone recurrence. New morphological subtypes of CBD presented by the authors can be important risk predictors of recurrence after endoscopic stone removal. Furthermore, the new morphological subtypes of CBD may predict the risk of residual CBD stones or technical difficulty in CBD stone removal. Further studies with a large sample size and longer follow-up durations are warranted to examine the usefulness of the newly identified morphological subtypes of CBD in predicting the outcomes of ERCP for CBD stone removal.

National clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease: 2021 recommendations from the Danish Surgical Society.

Gallstones are highly prevalent, and more than 9000 cholecystectomies are performed annually in Denmark. The aim of this guideline was to improve the clinical course of patients with gallstone disease including a subgroup of high-risk patients. Outcomes included reduction of complications, readmissions, and need for additional interventions in patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease, acute cholecystitis, and common bile duct stones (CBDS). An interdisciplinary group of clinicians developed the guideline according to the GRADE methodology. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were primarily included. Non-RCTs were included if RCTs could not answer the clinical questions. Recommendations were strong or weak depending on effect estimates, quality of evidence, and patient preferences. For patients with acute cholecystitis, acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended (16 RCTs, strong recommendation). Gallbladder drainage may be used as an interval procedure before a delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with temporary contraindications to surgery and severe acute cholecystitis (1 RCT and 1 non-RCT, weak recommendation). High-risk patients are suggested to undergo acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy instead of drainage (1 RCT and 1 non-RCT, weak recommendation). For patients with CBDS, a one-step procedure with simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and CBDS removal by laparoscopy or endoscopy is recommended (22 RCTs, strong recommendation). In high-risk patients with CBDS, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is suggested to be included in the treatment (6 RCTs, weak recommendation). For diagnosis of CBDS, the use of magnetic resonance imaging or endoscopic ultrasound prior to surgical treatment is recommended (8 RCTs, strong recommendation). For patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease, observation is suggested as an alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (2 RCTs, weak recommendation). Seven recommendations, four weak and three strong, for treating patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were developed. Studies for treatment of high-risk patients are few and more are needed. The Danish Surgical Society.