The notion of nuclear reactors with battery-like capabilities, called fission batteries, puts forth system requirements and design constraints that have so far been unseen in the nuclear power production industry. Such restrictions require fission batteries to be modular, integrated, autonomous, tamper-proof (i.e., resilient, fault-tolerant, all-weather, and safe), and affordable. With design requirements specifying no human intervention for operation, and minimal connectivity to remote monitoring networks, fission batteries are unique among existing nuclear power plants and emerging advanced reactor designs. Given these attributes, traditional probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) of fission batteries is expected to require dynamic methods to model advanced aspects, such as self-diagnosis, self-adjustment, and duration-prediction capabilities, as they are key ingredients for unattended operations. In addition, availability models need to integrate autonomous control, associated error-detection algorithms, and adversarial human actions. Currently, no existing framework demonstrably assesses these advanced attributes. This paper introduces and demonstrates an integrated framework for the dynamic modeling of fission battery designs. The proposed framework comprises a combined modeling strategy that uses the dual-graph error propagation methodology (DEPM) based on the continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) models implemented in OpenPRA Error Propagation (OpenErrorPro) and the dynamic PRA tool, Event Modeling Risk Assessment using Linked Diagrams (EMRALD), based on discrete dynamic event trees (DDET). This combination overcomes some of the limitations of the tools when used independently. It enables detailed dynamic analysis to produce time explicit results to support the development of fission battery traditional PRA models. To evaluate the utility of this novel approach, a demonstration case is shown that models the hypothesized response of a fission battery design to an external fire event. DEPM CTMCs and alternative failure approaches are coupled with EMRALD to characterize and quantify the likelihood of the event sequences. The results show that the combined framework effectively captures the dynamic aspects of fission battery design in terms of the timing and realism of modeled events. Given the complexity of the failure scenarios, we believe that EMRALD and DEPM are necessary and complementary when the need for high-resolution analysis offsets the challenges of detailed modeling.