Remote Magnetic Navigation Ablation Research Articles

Remote magnetic navigation ablation of incisional atrial flutters in adolescent with a giant right atrium after surgical correction of tetralogy of Fallot and Ebstein's anomaly

We describe a clinical case of a 17-years-old adolescent with congenital heart disease after three open-heart surgery procedures for correction of tetralogy of Fallot and Ebstein's anomaly who presented with drug-resistant, persistent atrial flutter and giant right atrium (8.2 cm by transthoracic echocardiography). The successful ablation procedure of the two types of incisional atrial flutter was performed using remote magnetic navigation without any complications with 2.2 minutes of fluoroscopy. The patient remained free of any arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drugs during 12 months of follow-up with a reduction of right atrium size (5.8 cm by transthoracic echocardiography).

Abstract 9860: Safety and Clinical Outcome of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Contact Force Sensing, Consecutive Case Series

Introduction: Poor catheter-to-myocardial contact can lead to ineffective ablation lesions and suboptimal outcome. Contact force (CF) sensing catheters in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablations has not been studied for their long term efficacy. Hypothesis: The hypothesis is that CF ablation is superior to manual ablation (MAN) and non-inferior to remote magnetic navigation (RMN) ablation for safety and efficacy in acute and long term outcome. Methods: A total of 249 consecutive patients underwent VT ablation, with the use of MAN, CF or RMN catheters were included in this single center cohort study from January 2007 until March 2014. The primary endpoints were procedural success, acute major complications and VT recurrences at follow-up. The average follow-up period was ± 20 months. Results: Acute success was achieved in 191 out of 249 procedures (75.9%). Acute success in manual ablation, CF ablation and RMN ablation was 70.1%, 72.3% and 85.2% respectively (P = 0.038). Major complications occurred in 3.2% and there was a trend towards less major complications (P = 0.055) in the RMN group. Thirty-six percent of the patients with an initially successful procedure had a recurrence during follow-up (CF 41.2% MAN 37.5% RMN 32.0% P = NS). Conclusions: The use of CF sensing catheters does not improve the procedural outcome or safety profile in comparison to non-CF sensing ablation in ventricular arrhythmias. RMN non-CF sensing ablation has the highest procedural success rate. Future studies are necessary to investigate the role of CF in VT ablation and to define the optimal force.

Safety and Clinical Outcome of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Contact Force Sensing: Consecutive Case Series.

Poor catheter-to-myocardial contact can lead to ineffective ablation lesions and suboptimal outcome. Contact force (CF) sensing catheters in ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) ablations have not been studied for their long-term efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare CF ablation to manual ablation (MAN) and remote magnetic navigation (RMN) ablation for safety and efficacy in acute and long-term outcome. A total of 239 consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation with the use of MAN, CF, or RMN catheters were included in this single-center cohort study from January 2007 until March 2014. The primary endpoints were procedural success, acute major complications, and VT recurrences at follow-up. The median follow-up period was 25 months. Acute success was achieved in 182 out of 239 procedures (76%). Acute success in manual ablation, CF ablation and RMN ablation was 71%, 71%, and 86%, respectively (P = 0.03). Major complications occurred in 3.3% and there were less major complications (P = 0.04) in the RMN group. After an initial successful procedure, 66 of 182 patients (36%) had a recurrence during follow-up. This was not significantly different between groups. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 124 patients (52%) had a recurrence. The recurrence rate was lowest in the RMN group. The use of CF sensing catheters did not improve procedural outcome or safety profile in comparison to non-CF sensing ablation in this observational study of ventricular arrhythmia ablations.