Remote Ischemic Preconditioning For Prevention Research Articles

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients of CKD Stage III and IV Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction:Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a serious complication of coronary angiography (CA). The aim of this randomized, parallel group, single blind, sham-controlled trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of the remote ischemic preconditioning on the prevention of CI-AKI.Methods:Patients of 18–80 years of age with CKD 3 and 4, who were admitted for elective coronary angiography in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to standard care with ischemic preconditioning (n = 45; intermittent arm ischemia through 4 cycles of 5-min inflation and 5-min deflation of a blood pressure cuff) or with standard care and sham ischemic preconditioning (n = 42). Overall, both study groups were at moderate risk of developing CI-AKI according to the Mehran risk score. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CI-AKI, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥25% or ≥0.5 mg/dL above baseline at 48 h after contrast medium exposure.Results:CI-AKI occurred in 8 patients (19.04%) in the control group and 2 (4.4%) in the remote ischemic preconditioning group (odds ratio, 0.198, 95% confidence interval, 0.087 to 0.452; P = 0.04). No major adverse events were related to remote ischemic preconditioning.Conclusions:This study indicates that remote ischemic preconditioning is a simple and well-tolerated procedure, which reduces the incidence of CI-AKI in CKD 3 and 4 patients undergoing coronary angiography.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Angioplasty Revascularization for Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Randomized Control Trial

Background: Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) following angiography is one of the leading causes of in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI). The aim of this study was to investigate the renoprotective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) to prevent CIN in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing lower limb angioplasty with standard preventative measures. Methods: 40 adult patients (eGFR >45 ml/min) undergoing peripheral arterial angioplasty received either: (1) Control: standard preventative measures comprising intravenous (IV) hydration with 0.9% normal saline (1ml/kg/hour) or (2) RIPC: four-5 min inflations and deflations of a pneumatic cuff placed on the upper arm in addition to IV hydration prior to the angiographic procedure. Serial measurements of serum creatinine, serum cystatin and urinary NGAL were taken at baseline and 2, 24, 48- and 72-hours post-procedure. The primary outcome was CIN as defined by a rise of creatinine by > 26.5umol/L above baseline within 48 hours of contrast exposure. Other outcome measures included the rise in urine NGAL and serum cystatin from base line at 2 hours, as an early marker of acute kidney injury (AKI). Results: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. All recruited patients had eGFR >45 ml/min, and RIPC had no renoprotective effect. AKI occurred in five (13%) patients. Changes in serum creatinine at 2 hours post-procedure did not correlate with changes in urine NGAL or serum Cystatin C. Conclusion: In stable PAD patients (eGFR >45ml/min) undergoing lower limb angioplasty with standard preventative measures, RIPC did not offer any protection against development of CIN.

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy – A randomized control trial

BackgroundThere is a lack of sufficient data regarding the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients at risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Thus, this study was conducted to determine whether RIPC as an adjunct to standard therapy prevents CIN in high-risk patients undergoing coronary intervention. MethodsIn a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 162 patients who were at risk of CIN received standard hydration combined with RIPC or hydration with sham preconditioning. RIPC was accomplished by four cycles of 5 min ischemia and 5 min reperfusion of the forearm. The primary endpoint was a rise in serum creatinine (>0.5 mg/dL or >25%) from baseline to serum creatinine 48–72 h after contrast administration. ResultsOf the 162 patients, 81 were randomly allocated to receive sham preconditioning and 81 to receive RIPC. Significantly reduced serum creatinine levels were observed in patients with a Mehran moderate risk allocated to sham group compared to the RIPC group (0.070 ± 0.16 mg/dL vs. 0.107 ± 0.13 mg/dL, p = 0.001). With regards to the primary endpoint, a significantly higher change in serum creatinine from baseline to 48–72 h was observed in the sham group compared to the RIPC group (0.023 ± 0.2 μmol/L vs −0.064 ± 0.1 μmol/L, p < 0.001). ConclusionRIPC as an alternative to standard therapy, improved serum creatinine levels after contrast administration in patients at risk of CIN. However, present data indicate that RIPC might have beneficial effects in patients with a moderate or high risk of CIN.

A Randomized Controlled Study of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Introduction: Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) is a technique which applies brief periods of reversible ischemia and reperfusion to limbs provoking adaptive protective responses to distant organs like Heart, Kidneys and Brain. Methods: Its efficacy in the prevention of Contrast Nephropathy was tested in our open-label, randomized and sham- controlled study. 100 patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 1-3a requiring Contrast agent for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions were included. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) or sham preconditioning. Results &amp; Discussion: Both groups were treated with Intravenous saline therapy before contrast exposure. The primary end point was contrast-Induced AKI. Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. Mean GFR in ml/min was similar in both groups (RIPC 54.8+/- 9 ml/min; Control 54.8+/- 9 ml/min) . Contrast-induced AKI occurred in 19/50 patients in control group and 6/50 in IPC group (p = 0.005).Hemodialysis was required only in control group (4/50) (p = 0.058). 30 day rehospitalization was more in control group (8 / 50) than RIPC group (1/50) (p = 0.01). RIPC was well- tolerated without adverse effects. Conclusion: In conclusion, remote ischemic preconditioning applied before contrast exposure prevents contrast-induced acute kidney injury in CKD 3a. This simple procedure can be added to intravenous saline therapy for nephroprotection.

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast induced nephropathy—Insights from an Indian study

ObjectivesTo study if four cycles of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) could offer protection against contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and post procedural renal dysfunction in high risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MethodsThis was a prospective single blind randomized sham controlled trial where patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with stage III chronic kidney disease were randomized into sham preconditioning and remote ischemic preconditioning. The primary outcome was the reduction in the incidence of CIN. The secondary outcomes were the maximum improvement in eGFR, maximum reduction in serum creatinine and composite of requirement of hemodialysis, death and rehospitalization for heart failure up to 6 weeks after PCI. ResultsEleven out of fifty patients in the study group developed CIN (22%) compared to eighteen out of the fifty control patients (36%) (p=0.123). There was a statistically significant improvement in the post procedure creatinine values at 24h (p=0.013), 48h (p=0.015), 2 weeks (p=0.003), 6 weeks (p=0.003) and post procedure glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values at 24h (p=0.026), 48h (p=0.044), 2 weeks (p=0.015) and 6 weeks (p=0.011) in study group compared to control group. The secondary outcome composite of requirement of hemodialysis, death and rehospitalization for heart failure was not statistically significant (p: 0.646). ConclusionRIPC does not result in significant reduction of CIN. However RIPC helps in the prevention of post procedural worsening in eGFR and serum creatinine even up to 6 weeks.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may attenuate acute kidney injury (AKI). However, results of studies evaluating the effect of RIPC on AKI after cardiac surgery have been controversial and contradictory.The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the association between RIPC and AKI after on-pump cardiac surgery.The authors searched relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through December 2015.We considered for inclusion all randomized controlled trials that the role of RIPC in reducing AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) among patients underwent on-pump cardiac surgical procedures.We collected the data on AKI, initiation of RRT, serum creatinine (sCr) levels, and in-hospital mortality. Random- and fixed-effect models were used for pooling data.Nineteen trials including 5100 patients were included. The results of this meta-analysis showed a significant benefit of RIPC for reducing the incidence of AKI after cardiac interventions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.98; P = 0.02). No significant difference was found in the incidence of RRT between RIPC and control (OR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.46–1.24; P = 0.36). In addition, compared with standard medical care, RIPC showed no significant difference in postoperative sCr (IV 0.07; 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.16; P = 0.20; postoperative day 1; IV 0.00; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.09; P = 0.92; postoperative day 2; IV 0.04; 95% CI, −0.05 to 0.12; P = 0.39; postoperative day 3), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.21, 95% CI, 0.64–2.30; P = 0.56).According to the results from present meta-analysis, RIPC was associated with a significant reduction AKI after on-pump cardiac surgery but incidence of RRT, postoperative sCr, and in-hospital mortality. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials and experimental researches comparing RIPC are desirable.

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast medium induced nephropathy – A study from a tertiary care centre in Southern India

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast medium induced nephropathy – A study from a tertiary care centre in Southern India

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Matched Cohort Study

Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The underlying mechanism has been attributed in part to ischemic kidney injury. The aim of this matched cohort study was to assess the impact of remote ischemic preconditioning (ICP) on AKI after TAVI

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast-medium-induced nephropathy: (RenoProtection-trial)

BackgroundContrast-medium-induced acute kidney injury is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The underlying mechanism has been partially attributed to ischemic kidney injury. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial was to assess the impact of remote ischemic preconditioning on contrast-medium-induced acute kidney injury. MethodsPatients with impaired renal function (serum creatinine >1.4mg/dL and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/1.73m2) undergoing elective coronary angiography were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to standard care with (n=50) or without ischemic preconditioning (n=50; intermittent arm ischemia through four cycles of 5-min inflation and 5-min deflation of a blood-pressure cuff). Overall, both study groups were at high risk to develop contrast-medium-induced acute kidney injury using Mehran risk score. The primary endpoint was the incidence of contrast-medium-induced kidney injury, defined as an increase of serum creatinine ≥25% and/or ≥0.5mg/dL above baseline at 48h after contrast-medium exposure. ResultsContrast-medium-induced acute kidney injury occurred in 26 patients (26%), 20 (40%) in the control group and 6 (12%) in the remote ischemic preconditioning group (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07–0.57; P=0.002). No major adverse events were related to remote ischemic preconditioning. ConclusionsRemote ischemic preconditioning before contrast-medium use prevents contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury in high risk patients. Our findings merit a larger trial to establish remote ischemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes.

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of high-altitude diseases: fact or fiction?

Preconditioning refers to exposure to brief episodes of potentially adverse stimuli and protects against injury during subsequent exposures. This was first described in the heart, where episodes of ischemia/reperfusion render the myocardium resistant to subsequent ischemic injury, which is likely caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and proinflammatory processes. Protection of the heart was also found when preconditioning was performed in an organ different from the target, which is called remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC). The mechanisms causing protection seem to include stimulation of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, increase in antioxidant enzymes, and downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines. These pathways are also thought to play a role in high-altitude diseases: high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) is associated with decreased bioavailability of NO and increased generation of ROS, whereas mechanisms causing acute mountain sickness (AMS) and high-altitude cerebral edema (HACE) seem to involve cytotoxic effects by ROS and inflammation. Based on these apparent similarities between ischemic damage and AMS, HACE, and HAPE, it is reasonable to assume that RIPC might be protective and improve altitude tolerance. In studies addressing high-altitude/hypoxia tolerance, RIPC has been shown to decrease pulmonary arterial systolic pressure in normobaric hypoxia (13% O2) and at high altitude (4,342 m). Our own results indicate that RIPC transiently decreases the severity of AMS at 12% O2. Thus preliminary studies show some benefit, but clearly, further experiments to establish the efficacy and potential mechanism of RIPC are needed.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) to prevent acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac and vascular interventions is a controversial practice. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the MEDLINE database (1966 through November 2013), EMBASE (1988 through November 2013), and Cochrane Library database. Patients undergoing cardiac and vascular interventions. Randomized controlled trials comparing patient outcome with or without RIPC for prevention of AKI following cardiac and vascular interventions. RIPC using an inflatable tourniquet around the limb or cross-clamping the iliac arteries versus non-RIPC. AKI, need for renal replacement therapy, postoperative kidney biomarkers, in-hospital mortality, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay. 13 trials (1,334 participants) were included. RIPC decreased the risk of AKI for patients undergoing cardiac and vascular interventions compared with the control group (11 trials; 1,216 participants; risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.48-1.02; P = 0.06; I(2) = 45%) with marginal statistical significance. There were no differences in levels of postoperative kidney biomarkers (serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate), incidence of renal replacement therapy, in-hospital mortality, hospital stay, or intensive care unit stay between the 2 groups. Metaregression analysis indicated that contrast intervention was not a covariate contributing significantly to heterogeneity on the risk estimate for AKI incidence; also, there was no dose effect of RIPC using tourniquet cuff around the limb on AKI prevention based on different ischemia duration. Different AKI definitions adopted in the trials included. RIPC might be beneficial for the prevention of AKI following cardiac and vascular interventions, but the current evidence is not robust enough to make a recommendation. Adequately powered trials are needed to provide more evidence in the future.