Remnant Stomach Research Articles

A preliminary exploration of reduced port laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with right-sided overlap and single-flap valvuloplasty (ROSF)

Objective: This study aimed to share preliminary experiences of single-incision plus two ports laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with right-sided overlap and single-flap valvuloplasty (ROSF). Methods: Following the 6th edition of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, proximal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed. Using a single-port approach, the esophagus was transected at least 2 cm above the tumor's upper margin with linear staplers. The stomach was then extracted through a periumbilical incision, and the proximal stomach was subsequently transected extracorporeally, while ensuring appropriate resection margins on both the greater and lesser curvatures. A single flap was created before returning the remnant stomach to the abdominal cavity and re-establishing pneumoperitoneum. The No.2 clip was used to grasp and elevate the esophageal stump. An incision was made at the right lower edge of the esophageal stump to guarantee that the esophageal lumen was open. The linear stapler was then inserted into the openings of the stomach and esophagus to perform a side overlap anastomosis with a length of 3 cm. Another barbed suture was used to close the common opening of the esophagus and the stomach, and the same barbed suture were used to suture the gastric wall to the lower edge of the muscle flap. The first barbed suture was then used to sequentially suture the proximal brim of the flap to the esophagus and the right brim of the flap to the right brim of the mucosal window. After completion of anastomosis, a drainage tube was inserted through the right upper port. This procedure was employed from November 2023 to March 2024 on five patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and upper stomach. The cohort consisted of three males and two females, with an age range of 62 to 75 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 13.7 to 24.2 kg/m². All cases were preoperatively staged as T1-2N0M0, confirmed by endoscopic biopsy and enhanced CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Results: All five patients successfully underwent the surgery. The median surgery time was 180-325 minutes, with the intraoperative blood loss of 30-50 ml. The number of lymph nodes harvested ranged from 18 to 27. The time to first flatus, and restore liquid diet and was 2.0-5.0 and 1.0-3.0 days, respectively. The postoperative length of stay was 9.0-11.0 days. The pain scores on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). On the first day, the pain scores were 3.0 in two cases, 2.0 in two cases, and 1.0 in one case. On the second day, the pain scores were 2.0 in two cases and 1.0 in three cases. On the third day, the pain scores were 1.0 in four cases and 2.0 in one case. No short-term postoperative complications were observed, and there were no perioperative deaths. Conclusion: Single-incision plus two ports laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with ROSF is safe and feasible.

Assessment of Gastric Remnant Activity, Symptoms, and Quality of Life Following Gastric Bypass.

While most gastric bypass patients recover well, some experience long-term complications, including nausea, abdominal pain, food intolerance, and dumping. This study aimed to evaluate symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in association with the residual activity of the remnant stomach. Patients undergoing gastric bypass and conversion-to-bypass were recruited. The Gastric Alimetry® System (Auckland, NZ) was employed, comprising a high-resolution electrode array, wearable reader, and validated symptom logging app. The protocol comprised 30-min fasting baseline, a 218-kCal meal stimulus, and 4-h of post-prandial recordings. Symptoms and QoL were evaluated using validated questionnaires. Remnant gastric electrophysiology evaluation included frequency, BMI-adjusted amplitude, and Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (GA-RI, reflecting pacemaker stability), with comparison to validated reference intervals and matched controls. Thirty-eight participants were recruited with mean time from bypass 46.8 ± 28.6months. One-third of patients showed moderate to severe post-prandial symptoms, with patients' median PAGI-SYM 28 ± 19 vs controls 9 ± 17 (p < 0.01); PAGI-QOL 37 ± 31 vs 135 ± 22 (p < 0.0001). Remnant gastric function was markedly degraded shown by undetectable frequencies in 84% (vs 0% in controls) and low GA-RI (0.18 ± 0.08 vs 0.51 ± 0.22 in controls; p < 0.0001; reference range > 0.25). Impaired GA-RI and amplitude were correlated with worse PAGI-SYM and PAGI-QOL scores. One-third of post-bypass patients suffered significant upper GI symptoms with reduced QoL. The bypassed remnant stomach shows highly deranged electrophysiology in-situ, reflecting disuse degeneration. These derangements correlated with QoL; however, causality is not implied by the present study.

An incidentally found mass on the remnant stomach after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundIncidentally found masses are a widely discussed area of medicine, and there are conflicting opinions as to how to deal with these findings, particularly in the stomach—which has limited documentation in the literature. Here we present a middle-aged female who was found to have an incidentally found mass on her remnant stomach 10 years after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.Case presentationWe present the case of a 66-year-old female who is 10 years post-op from a RYGB. After a bout of self-resolving diarrheal illness prompted a computed tomography (CT) scan in the emergency department, she was diagnosed with a 9-cm mass on her remnant stomach that after resection was found to be a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with the PDGRRA p.D842V gene mutation.ConclusionThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) outlines guidelines for the workup of abdominal masses. While endoscopic ultrasound is a common step in diagnosis of gastric masses, for a patient who has had a RYGB, access to the remnant stomach, which is no longer a part of the alimentary tract, is not possible. Thus, this patient’s mass was surgically resected. Given the low risk of recurrence, her future care consists of follow-up with medical oncology in accordance with the NCCN guidelines.

Clinicopathological Features of Early Gastric Cancer Complicated by Autoimmune Gastritis

Introduction: In the post-Helicobacter pylori era, autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is attracting increasing attention as an origin of gastric cancer. Here, we performed clinicopathological examination of gastric cancer complicating AIG treated in our hospital. Methods: Eighty-six early gastric cancer lesions complicating AIG in 50 patients were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at our hospital in 2008–2022. Their clinicopathological characteristics were compared with those of a control group comprising 2,978 early gastric cancer lesions (excluding lesions in the remnant stomach after surgery) in 2,278 patients treated by ESD during the same period. Results: Mean age was significantly higher in the AIG group than in the control group (74.7 years vs. 70.9 years; p < 0.01). In the respective groups, the occurrence rate of synchronous/metachronous lesions was 38.0% and 20.4% (p < 0.01), the ratio of longitudinal cancer locations (upper/middle/lower third [U/M/L]) was 27/32/27 and 518/993/1,467 (p < 0.01), the ratio of circumferential cancer locations (lesser curvature/greater curvature/anterior wall/posterior wall) was 25/31/12/18 and 1,259/587/475/657 (p < 0.01), the ratio of major macroscopic types (I/IIa/IIb/IIc) was 13/38/5/30 and 65/881/220/1,812 (p < 0.01). The rates of multiple gastric cancer and cancers in the U region, at the greater curvature, and of protruding types were significantly higher in the AIG group. Conclusion: The occurrence rate of multiple gastric cancer was significantly higher in gastric cancer complicating AIG (approximately 40%), and compared with the control group, the proportions of cancers at the U region, at the greater curvature, and of protruding types were significantly higher.

Food passage following proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and its effect on nutritional status in early gastric cancer: a prospective single-center cohort study.

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) expectedly results in improved nutritional status and less body weight loss than conventional total gastrectomy in upper-third gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate the food passage patterns following LPG-DTR and its effect on nutritional outcomes up to 1 year after surgery. This prospective cohort study recruited 10 patients with early gastric cancer scheduled for LPG-DTR. Nutritional indices and body composition were assessed every 3 months up to 12 months. Liquid and solid food transits were evaluated with fluoroscopic upper gastrointestinal study and radionuclide scintigraphy, respectively. At 12 months, patients exhibited a body weight loss of 14.5% ± 3.6%. The main passage routes for liquid and solid foods differed, primarily via the interposed jejunum for liquids, whereas via both tracts for solids. The median half-life of solid food emptying from the remnant distal stomach was 105.1 minutes (range, 50.8-2,194.2 minutes), and duodenal passage of solid food was noted in 9 of 10 patients. Those with gastric half-emptying time >3 hours demonstrated greater weight loss (19.5% ± 1.4% vs. 12.5% ± 1.1%, P = 0.024) and more pronounced reduction in serum albumin levels (-0.5 ± 0.3 g/dL vs. 0.0 ± 0.2 g/dL, P = 0.024) after 12 months. LPG-DTR demonstrated varying food passage patterns depending on the food contents and delayed solid food emptying from the remnant stomach was associated with more substantial weight loss.

Useful of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in preventing glucose spikes

BackgroundVolatile glucose levels after gastrectomy induce dumping syndrome, which adversely affects patient quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the glycemic variability of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (PGDTR) as a function-preserving procedure. MethodsThis study used a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system to record glycemic profiles of patients who underwent PGDTR or total gastrectomy (TG) and compared them. Moreover, this study evaluated postgastrectomy syndrome, including dumping symptoms, between the PGDTR and TG groups using the 37-item Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS-37) questionnaire. ResultsOf note, 44 patients underwent PGDTR, and 42 patients underwent TG, which included more advanced cases. CGM results showed that the SD, relative SD, and maximum drop in glucose level between 30 min and 2 h after a meal were smaller in the PGDTR group than in the TG group (14.81 vs 22.40 mg/dL [P < .001], 0.14 vs 0.20 mg/dL [P < .001], and 42.06 vs 117.67 mg/dL [P < .001], respectively). For nocturnal glucose levels, SD and percentage time below the range were smaller in the PGDTR group than in the TG group (11.76 vs 15.16 mg/dL [P = .005] and 11.25% vs 35.27% [P < .001]). The PGDTR group generally performed better than the TG group on all the PGSAS-37 questionnaire items. Patients in the PGDTR group without food inflow into the remnant stomach showed similar CGM results as those in the TG group but with stronger dumping symptoms. ConclusionFood inflow into the remnant stomach is essential for PGDTR to be a function-preserving procedure as it leads to the control of dumping symptoms and lower glucose level spikes.

Corrigendum to ‘‘Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication utilizing the remnant stomach for treatment of GERD after Roux-en Y gastric bypass: How I do It’’

Corrigendum to ‘‘Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication utilizing the remnant stomach for treatment of GERD after Roux-en Y gastric bypass: How I do It’’

Subtotal esophagectomy and concurrent reconstruction with free jejunal flap for primary esophageal cancer after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Pancreatoduodenectomy and subtotal esophagectomy are widely considered the most invasive and difficult surgical procedures in gastrointestinal surgery. Subtotal esophagectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy is expected to be extremely difficult due to complicated anatomical changes, and selecting an appropriate intestinal reconstruction method will also be a difficult task. Therefore, perhaps because the method is considered impossible, there have been few reports of subtotal esophagectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. A 73-year-old man with a history of pancreatoduodenectomy was diagnosed with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Definitive chemoradiation therapy was recommended at another hospital; however, he visited our department to undergo surgery. We performed the robot-assisted thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. There were some difficulties with the reconstruction: the gastric tube could not be used, the reconstruction was long, and the organs reconstructed in the previous surgery had to be preserved. However, the concurrent reconstruction was achieved with the help of a free jejunal flap and vascular reconstruction. All reconstructions from the previous surgery, including the remnant stomach, were preserved via regional abdominal lymph node dissection. After reconstruction, intravenous indocyanine green showed that circulation in the reconstructed intestines was preserved. On postoperative day 1, no recurrent nerve paralysis was observed during laryngoscopy. The patient could start oral intake smoothly 2weeks after surgery and did not exhibit any postoperative complications related to the reconstruction. The patient was transferred to another hospital on postoperative day 21. Owing to the free jejunal flap interposition method, we safely performed one stage subtotal esophagectomy and concurrent reconstruction, preservation of the remnant stomach, and pancreaticobiliary reconstruction in patients with a history of pancreatoduodenectomy. We believe that this method is acceptable and useful for patients undergoing complicated reconstruction.

Cancer of the Esophagogastric Junction: Double Tract Reconstruction - Evidence and Technique

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) still represent a certain surgical challenge. In contrary to the trend of thoracoabdominal surgery for AEG I and AEG II cancer, the proximal gastrectomy is regaining popularity through new reconstruction methods such as the double tract reconstruction. Proximal gastrectomy followed by double tract reconstruction represents an alternative for the thoracoabdominal approach for suitable AEG II cancer and an alternative to the total gastrectomy for AEG III cancers. Latest studies suggest a functional benefit of proximal gastrectomy and double tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy. The accurate indication for proximal gastrectomy for locally advanced cancers has to be established in the near future as well as the influence of the size of the remnant stomach on the outcome, as Asian techniques for early lesions sometimes significantly differ from European. The following article reflects the present evidence on proximal gastrectomy and double tract reconstruction as well as technical aspects in the context of cancer of the esophagogastric junction.

Risk factors for intraoperative and delayed perforation related with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Perforation is one of the most important complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). Several studies have examined risk factors for intraoperative and delayed perforations, but most were retrospective analyses with small numbers of patients. This study represents a secondary analysis of a Japanese multicenter prospective cohort study. We investigated the factors associated with each type of perforation using 9015 patients with 9975 EGCs undergoing ESD between July 2010 and June 2012. Intraoperative perforation occurred in 198 patients (2.2%) with 203 lesions (2.0%), necessitating emergency surgery for four lesions (0.04% [2.0%, 4/203]). Delayed perforation occurred in another 37 patients (0.4%) with 42 lesions (0.4%), requiring emergency surgery for 12 lesions (0.12% [28.6%, 12/42]). Factors showing significant independent correlations with intraoperative perforation were upper or middle third of the stomach; remnant stomach or gastric tube; procedure time ≥100min; tumor size >35mm; body mass index (BMI)<18.5kg/m2; and ≥72years. Factors showing significant independent correlations with delayed perforation were procedure time ≥60min; BMI<18.5kg/m2; ≥75years; ulceration; and tumor size >20mm. Intraoperative perforation occurred most frequently at the greater curvature in the upper third of the stomach (7.9%), whereas delayed perforation occurred most frequently at the greater curvature in the middle third (1.2%). This multicenter prospective cohort study clarified the risk and risk factors of intraoperative and delayed perforation related to ESD for EGCs, providing information to help endoscopists reduce perforation.

Safe and Accurate Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer With Severe Adhesions Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging: Guidance in Detection of the Accurate Dissection Layer to Avoid Organ Injury.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) requires advanced techniques due to severe postoperative adhesions and anatomic changes. We performed LTG in 2 patients with RGC using intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging. Both cases previously underwent distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction for gastric cancer and were subsequently diagnosed with early-stage gastric cancer of the remnant stomach. Indocyanine green (2.5mg/body) was administered intravenously during surgery. The liver and common bile duct were clearly visualized during surgery using near-infrared fluorescence laparoscopy, and the adhesions between the hepatobiliary organs and remnant stomach were safely dissected. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy was successfully performed without complications, and the postoperative course was uneventful in both cases. Intraoperative real-time ICG fluorescence imaging allows clear visualization of the liver and common bile duct and can be useful in LTG for RGC with severe adhesions.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with Toupet fundoplication (T-sleeve): A short report of a Japanese obesity patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed procedure in bariatric-metabolic surgery (BMS) worldwide, accounting for approximately 90% of BMS procedures in Japan. While numerous studies have reported on the safety and efficacy of LSG, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major postoperative complication. Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is preferred for severe obesity with GERD, it is less suitable for Japanese patients who have a higher risk of gastric cancer due to the remnant stomach which is difficult to observe with esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. To address de novo and exacerbation GERD after LSG, we conducted LSG with Toupet fundoplication (T-sleeve) for Japanese patients with severe obesity. In our first T-sleeve case, the patient demonstrated sufficient weight loss and improved GERD following surgery. Hence, we suggest that T-sleeve is a feasible option for Japanese patients with obesity and concurrent GERD.

Successful subtotal gastrectomy and hepatectomy for HER2-positive gastric cancer with liver metastasis after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy: a case report

BackgroundConversion surgery (CS) after chemotherapy is weakly recommended as a promising tool for improving prognoses in patients with unresectable gastric cancer. Moreover, several investigators have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of subtotal gastrectomy (sTG) with a small remnant stomach for the nutritional status and surgical outcome compared with total gastrectomy. Here, we report a patient with liver metastasis from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer who underwent sTG and hepatectomy after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy.Case presentationAn 84-year-old male patient was diagnosed with HER2-positive gastric cancer with a single liver metastasis. He was treated with eight courses of trastuzumab in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy. The primary tumor and liver metastasis shrank significantly. The metastatic liver lesion’s reduction rate was 65%. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the patient had a partial response. Therefore, he underwent an sTG with D2 lymphadenectomy and partial hepatectomy of segment 2. Histopathological examination revealed a grade 3 histological response without lymph node metastases from the primary tumor. No viable cancer cells were observed in the resected liver specimens. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. The postoperative quality of life (QOL) evaluated using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 was maintained, and the patient was still alive 8 months after the CS without recurrence.ConclusionsAn sTG with a small remnant stomach might be clinically useful for preventing a decline in QOL and improving prognoses in patients with stage IV gastric cancer after chemotherapy.

Robotic distal gastrectomy plus spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: optimal resection for simultaneous gastric cancer and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreatic body

BackgroundOrgan-preserving surgery has recently gained increasing attention. However, performing the surgery for duplicated gastric and distal pancreatic tumors is difficult because of procedural complexity and concerns of remnant gastric necrosis. We present the first case of simultaneous robotic distal gastrectomy plus spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in a patient with overlapping gastric cancer and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.Case presentationA 78-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric cancer in the middle stomach and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreatic body. Radical cure surgery was performed using the da Vinci Xi robotic system. Conventional distal gastrectomy was initially completed using near-infrared ray guidance when transecting the stomach. After dividing the pancreas, the parenchyma of the distal pancreas was detached from the splenic artery and vein; multiple branches from these splenic vessels were dissected. Indocyanine green imaging confirmed sufficient blood flow in the splenic vessels and perfusion of the remnant stomach. Ultimately, gastrointestinal reconstruction was performed, and the postoperative course was uneventful.ConclusionsThe robotic distal gastrectomy plus spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy procedure was safely performed. Compared to the total gastrectomy plus distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy procedure, this technique may improve the quality of dietary life, reduce weight loss, and prevent complications associated with splenectomy.

Intraoesophageal pressure in patients receiving proximal gastrectomy with hinged double flap method for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background: Objective functional assessment of esophagogastric anastomosis in patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with the hinged double flap method for gastric cancer has not been well investigated. This study aimed to perform a functional analysis of reconstruction using high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM). Materials and methods: The authors enroled 25 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer between May 2015 and April 2020 and subsequently underwent HRIM postoperatively. Eligible questionnaires [Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37)] were retrieved from 16 patients. The association between HRIM data and PGSAS-37 was analyzed. Results: The amplitudes of distal oesophageal peristaltic waves, contractile front velocity, and distal latency assessed by HRIM were almost normal after surgery. Most patient’s lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure created by the hinged double flap was within normal limits. Conversely, LES residual pressure values during swallowing-induced relaxation were abnormally high in most patients, and the lower the values, the more severe the reflux and diarrhoea symptoms (P=0.038, P=0.041, respectively). In addition, even when the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) was normal, lower values corresponded to more severe reflux symptoms (P=0.020). The required LES pressure may be higher after proximal gastrectomy because of the relatively higher intragastric pressure due to the reduced volume of the remnant stomach. This also suggests that swallowing-induced relaxation of the LES was considered a trigger for oesophageal reflux in post-proximal gastrectomy patients. Conclusion: LES residual pressure and IRP values in HRIM correlated with reflux symptoms in patients after proximal gastrectomy.

Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Stomach Preservation in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer: 5-year Results of the SENORITA Trial.

This study aimed to compare laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for EGC in terms of 5-year long-term oncologic outcomes. The oncological safety of LSNNS for early gastric cancer (EGC) has not been confirmed. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS), which is the primary endpoint of the phase III multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (SEntinel Node ORIented Tailored Approach [SENORITA] trial), did not show the non-inferiority of LSNNS relative to LSG. The SENORITA trial, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, was designed to show that LSNNS is non-inferior to LSG in terms of 3-year DFS. In the present study, we collected 5-year follow-up data from 527 patients recruited in the SENORITA trial as the full analysis set (FAS). Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence patterns were evaluated using the FAS of both LSG (n=269) and LSNNS (n=258). The 5-year DFS was not significantly different between the LSG and LSNNS groups (P=0.0561). During the 5-year follow-up, gastric cancer-related events, such as metachronous cancer, were more frequent in the LSNNS group than in the LSG group. However, ten recurrent cancers in the remnant stomach of both groups were curatively resected by additional gastrectomy and one by additional endoscopic resection. Two of the 198 patients who underwent local resection for stomach preservation based on the LSNNS results developed distant metastasis. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year OS and DSS (P=0.7403 and P=0.9586, respectively) between the two groups. The 5-year DFS, DSS and OS did not differ significantly between the two groups. Considering the benefits of LSNNS on postoperative quality of life, LSNNS could be recommended as an alternative treatment option for EGC.

Metachronous remnant gastric cancer after proximal gastrectomy.

260 Background: Proximal gastrectomy is frequently selected for early gastric cancer located at the upper third of the stomach. Annual postoperative endoscopy is considered to be useful for the early detection of metachronous remnant gastric cancer (MRGC). Despite that, we sometimes have also encountered cases that are not suitable for endoscopic resection (ER). The aim of this study is to identify the risk factors for the patients who developed MRGC after proximal gastrectomy, received annual endoscopy, but are not eligible for ER (non-ER). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 191 patients who had received annual endoscopic surveillance after undergoing PG for cT1 gastric cancer at NCCH between 2006-2015. MRGCs were categorized into two groups: ER group and non-ER group. The remnant stomach was defined as three locations: pseudo-fornix (PF), corpus and antrum. Results: The median observation period was 73 (range 12-168) months. MRGC was observed in 29 cases with 32 lesions. ER was eligible for 20 lesions (ER group, 62.5%), but 12 were not (non-ER group, 37.5%). We compared the characteristics between of ER group and non-ER group in terms of sex, age (&gt;65 years), interval from the initial surgery (&gt;60months), the location (PF vs non-PF), and cross-sectional circumference (posterior wall vs. others). In both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the location at PF was identified as a risk factor for non-ER group (OR 25.0, 95% CI: 1.8–339, p = 0.015). Among 12 lesions of the non-ER group, the location of PF was found in 6 (50%) lesions. As compared with MRGC at the non-PF, that at the PF (n = 6) was characterized by younger patients (57.5 (range 37-69) years vs. 69 (56-77) years), larger size (36 (7-57) mm vs. 9 (9-24) mm), deeper depth (MP or deeper; 5/6 vs. 0/6), more frequent undifferentiated-type histology (4/6 vs. 0/6) and frequent nodal metastasis (3/6 vs. 0/6). The interval to detect MRGC appears to be longer in the PF (78 (31-96) months than that of the non-PF (60 (31-96) months), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.86). Then, we examined the visibility and the mucosal normality of the area developing MRGC in the annual follow-up endoscopy one year before the detection of MRGC (n =32). In 25 lesions at the non-PF, the visibility and the mucosal normality was secured in 21 (84%). while 5 PF lesions were difficult to observe (71.4%, p = 0.01) due to food residues in 4 (57%, p = 0.047) and insufficient expansion of the gastric mucosa in 4 (57%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Detection of the MRGC at the PF at an early stage is crucial and challenging. With annual follow-up endoscopy, complete clearance and adequately extending the gastric mucosa could lead to the early detection of MRGC at the PF.

A multi-institutional prospective study to compare postoperative quality of life of patients who undergo proximal or total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (CCOG1602).

296 Background: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has become an increasingly preferred procedure for treating early cancer in the upper third of the stomach when oncological safety is ensured, with expectation for improvement of nutritional status and quality of life (QOL) attributable to the remnant stomach. Although few studies compare postoperative outcomes of patients who undergo total gastrectomy (TG) and PG based on questionnaires, their significant limitations include the retrospective design, use of a questionnaire not specific to a postgastrectomy setting, and observation at a fixed time or after a short postoperative period. Methods: A multi-institutional prospective study (CCOG1602) of patients who undergo PG or TG for cStage I gastric cancer was conducted. We used the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-37 and The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) to evaluate the changes in body weight and QOL over a 3-year postoperative period. The primary endpoint was the weight loss rate 3 years after surgery. Results: We enrolled 109 patients from 18 institutions and selected 65 and 19 patients for inclusion in the TG and PG groups, respectively. There were no differences in age, sex, or preoperative body mass index between the TG and PG groups. Mean postoperative weight loss rates were 16.0% and 11.7% for the TG and PG groups, respectively (Cohen's D 0.656) during postoperative year 1 and 15.0% and 10.8% for TG and PG (Cohen's D 0.543), respectively, during postoperative year 3, indicating that the PG group achieved a better trend with a moderate effect size. According to the PGSAS-37, the PG group experienced a better trend in the indigestion subscale (Cohen's D –1.085) and total symptom score (Cohen's D –0.59) during postoperative year 3 compared with the TG group. In contrast, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 identified no difference between the groups at any time point during the 3-year postoperative period. Conclusions: The CCOG1602 demonstrates that PG tended to be more favorable compared with TG with respect to postoperative weight loss and QOL, particularly regarding indigestion. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020070 .

Characteristics of Metachronous Remnant Gastric Cancer After Proximal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis.

Despite annual endoscopy, patients with metachronous remnant gastric cancer (MRGC) following proximal gastrectomy (PG) are at times ineligible for endoscopic resection (ER). This study aimed to clarify the clinical risk factors for ER inapplicability. We reviewed the records of 203 patients who underwent PG for cT1 gastric cancer between 2006 and 2015. The remnant stomach was categorized as a pseudofornix, corpus, or antrum. Thirty-two MRGCs were identified in the 29 patients. Twenty MRGCs were classified as ER (ER group, 62.5%), whereas 12 were not (non-ER group, 37.5%). MRGCs were located in the pseudo-fornix in 1, corpus in 5, and antrum in 14 in the ER group, and in the pseudo-fornix in 6, corpus in 4, and antrum in 2 in the non-ER group (P=0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed that the pseudo-fornix was an independent risk factor for non-ER (P=0.014). In the non-ER group, MRGCs at the pseudo-fornix (n=6) had more frequent undifferentiated-type histology (4/6 vs. 0/6), deeper (≥pT1b2; 6/6 vs. 2/6) and nodal metastasis (3/6 vs. 0/6) than non-pseudo-fornix lesions (n=6). We examined the visibility of the region developing MRGC on an annual follow-up endoscopy one year before MRGC detection. In seven lesions at the pseudofornix, visibility was only secured in two (28.6%) because of food residues. Of the 25 lesions in the non-pseudo-fornix, visibility was secured in 21 lesions (84%; P=0.010). Endoscopic visibility increases the chances of ER applicability. Special preparation is required to ensure the complete clearance of food residues in the pseudo-fornix.

Evaluation of Quality of Life and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients After Laparoscopic Subtotal Gastrectomy.

The clinical significance of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LsTG) with a small remnant stomach remains unclear in patients with gastric cancer, including at an advanced stage. The present study assessed postoperative quality of life (QOL) and survival after LsTG compared with laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent LsTG (n=26) or LTG (n=26). Surgical outcome, postoperative nutritional status, QOL, and prognosis were compared between the LsTG and LTG groups. The Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale was used to evaluate postoperative QOL. Operating time was significantly shorter (p<0.01) and postoperative morbidity was significantly lower (p=0.04) in the LsTG than in the LTG group. The reduction in body weight after surgery was significantly greater in the LTG than in the LsTG group (p<0.01). The Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale revealed that, compared with LTG, LsTG significantly improved postoperative QOL (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in relapse-free survival and cancer-specific survival between the two groups. Three patients in the LTG group died of pneumonia and overall survival was significantly longer in the LsTG group (p=0.01). This study demonstrated the efficacy of LsTG with a small remnant stomach to prevent a decline in postoperative QOL and non-cancer-related death.