Remission In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research Articles

Is Remission Now an Achievable Goal for More Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus?

More than 3.4 million people worldwide are affected by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a chronic, complex, and unpredictable autoimmune condition that can take years to diagnose. SLE, the most common form of lupus, frequently has a profoundly negative impact on the quality of life for patients, with many reporting chronic fatigue, anxiety, and pain as symptoms. Inadequate disease control, and associated side effects of current treatment for people with SLE, lead to recurrent flares in symptoms and high risk of organ damage. Fifty percent of people with SLE have irreversible organ damage within 5 years of diagnosis due to long-term oral glucocorticoid (GC) use, disease flares, and persistent disease activity. SLE mortality remains unacceptably high and is one of the top 10 causes of death in young women in the USA. Although the speed of innovation has accelerated in recent years, there is still a great need beyond symptom management to tackle the underlying cause of the disease and achieve clinical remission for patients. In 2023, the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) updated its recommendations for SLE management, elevating the importance of treating to target remission or low disease activity with elimination of steroids, where possible, to reduce the risk of organ damage and adverse outcomes in patients. EULAR defines remission in SLE, according to the Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria, as having no disease activity while receiving treatment, but GC ≤5 mg/day. Two leading SLE experts, Ian Bruce, Queen’s University Belfast, UK, and Julia Weinmann-Menke, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany, discuss why remission is now a realistic goal in SLE, and how aiming for early and sustained remission can help to improve patient outcomes and address urgent unmet medical needs.

Novel endothelial progenitor cells populations as biomarkers of damage and remission in systemic lupus erythematosus

IntroductionEndothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are essential for maintenance of vascular homeostasis and stability, key processes in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the role and phenotypic characterization of EPCs populations in SLE have not been completely elucidated.ObjectiveTo identify EPCs specific subpopulations in patients with SLE using a novel flow cytometry tool.MethodsPeripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from patients with SLE and healthy controls (HC). mRNA and surface protein expression were determined by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and flow cytometry. Clusters identification and characterization were performed using tSNE-CUDA dimensionality reduction algorithms.ResultstSNE-CUDA analysis identified eight different clusters in PBMCs from HC and patients with SLE. Three of these clusters had EPC-like phenotype and the expression was elevated in patients with SLE. Moreover, four SLE-associated subclusters were found mainly expressed in patients with SLE, being only present in patients in remission with SLE and significantly associated with the 2021 Definition of Remission in SLE. Importantly, we also identified specific clusters in SLE patients with organ damage, according to the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology damage index (SDI). These clusters showed an EPC-like phenotype, but the expression of angiogenic markers was lower compared to HC or patients without organ damage, suggesting an impaired angiogenic function.ConclusionOur novel approach identified clusters of EPCs in patients with SLE that are associated with remission and damage. Therefore, these clusters might be useful biomarkers to predict disease progression and severity in SLE pathogenesis.

Rituximab induced remission in systemic lupus erythematosus with lupus nephritis along with nail fold capillaroscopy and trichoscopic findings: a case report

Lupus nephritis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Early diagnosis and treatment are important, as early response to therapy is correlated with better prognosis and quality of life. Here, we report a case of 24-year-old male with SLE along with lupus nephritis. The patient was given 3 cycles of rituximab 1 gm 6 months apart following which the patient went into remission. Thus, Rituximab has been found to be an effective therapeutic modality to induce remission in SLE with Lupus Nephritis and also avoids the potential toxicity associated with standard immunosuppressive agents. Nail fold capillaroscopy (NFC) and trichoscopy were done which helped in the diagnosis of the disease.

CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Autoimmune Disease — A Case Series with Follow-up

BackgroundTreatment for autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), idiopathic inflammatory myositis, and systemic sclerosis often involves long-term immune suppression. Resetting aberrant autoimmunity in these diseases through deep depletion of B cells is a potential strategy for achieving sustained drug-free remission.MethodsWe evaluated 15 patients with severe SLE (8 patients), idiopathic inflammatory myositis (3 patients), or systemic sclerosis (4 patients) who received a single infusion of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells after preconditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Efficacy up to 2 years after CAR T-cell infusion was assessed by means of Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) remission criteria, American College of Rheumatology–European League against Rheumatism (ACR–EULAR) major clinical response, and the score on the European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group (EUSTAR) activity index (with higher scores indicating greater disease activity), among others. Safety variables, including cytokine release syndrome and infections, were recorded.ResultsThe median follow-up was 15 months (range, 4 to 29). The mean (±SD) duration of B-cell aplasia was 112±47 days. All the patients with SLE had DORIS remission, all the patients with idiopathic inflammatory myositis had an ACR–EULAR major clinical response, and all the patients with systemic sclerosis had a decrease in the score on the EUSTAR activity index. Immunosuppressive therapy was completely stopped in all the patients. Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 10 patients. One patient each had grade 2 cytokine release syndrome, grade 1 immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and pneumonia that resulted in hospitalization.ConclusionsIn this case series, CD19 CAR T-cell transfer appeared to be feasible, safe, and efficacious in three different autoimmune diseases, providing rationale for further controlled clinical trials. (Funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and others.)

Pragmatic targets for moderate/severe SLE and their implications for clinical care and trial design: sustained DORIS or LLDAS for at least 6 months is sufficient while their attainment for at least 24 months ensures high specificity for damage-free progression

ObjectivesTreatment targets in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated in unselected—in terms of severity—cohorts, which limits their generalisability. We assessed remission (Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS)) and Lupus...

Remission Possible: New Era of SLE Treatment with Biologics Involvement

Treat-to-target (T2T) is a therapeutic approach used in several rheumatologic disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, gout, axial spondylarthritis, and other inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease. Developing a T2T strategy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been difficult due to the complexity of the disease. The 2019 EULAR recommendations for the management of SLE, reestablished in the 2023 EULAR guideline, specified that the primary treatment goal should be remission or the lowest possible disease activity. In SLE, remission is associated with reduced organ damage, fewer flares, reduced hospitalisation, reduced mortality, and improved health-related quality of life. Previously remission in SLE was seen as an unattainable goal; however, the treatment landscape for SLE has evolved, and recent advancements, particularly the use of biologics, have emerged as promising therapeutic options to improve patient outcomes. A new post-hoc analysis of the TULIP Phase III programme provides evidence across four years that remission is an achievable goal with anifrolumab, a type I interferon (IFN) receptor antagonist for adult patients with moderate to severe (SLE) who are receiving standard therapy. At Week 208, 30.3% (n=58/194) of patients treated with anifrolumab were in remission compared with 18.3% (n=12/65) of those in the standard therapy alone group. This was an increase from 19.7% (n=49/251) of patients treated with anifrolumab who achieved remission at the first LTE visit (Week 64) compared with 9.9% (n=10/104) of those in the standard therapy alone group. Treatment with anifrolumab was also associated with more frequent, prolonged, and sustained DORIS remission attainment compared with placebo during the 4-year TULIP+LTE period. Real-world case studies have also illustrated the effectiveness of biologics in controlling disease activity, enhancing quality of life, and establishing long-term safety profiles. In conclusion, biologic therapies have emerged as a valuable treatment option for achieving remission or lupus low disease activity state. Biologics has opened a new era revolutionizing the management of SLE, offering renewed hope for patients living with this challenging autoimmune disease.

Targeting DORIS Remission and LLDAS in SLE: A Review.

Remission is the established therapeutic goal for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is currently defined by the widely adopted Definition Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) criteria. Attainment of remission is rare in the clinical setting, thus an alternative, pragmatic treatment target of low disease activity, as defined by the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), provides a less stringent and more attainable treatment goal for a wider proportion of patients compared with DORIS remission. Randomized controlled trials and real-world analyses have confirmed the positive clinical benefits of achieving either DORIS remission or LLDAS. The treat-to-target (T2T) approach utilizes practical clinical targets to proactively tailor individual treatment regimens. Studies in other chronic inflammatory diseases using the T2T approach demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes and quality-of-life measures compared with established standard of care. However, such trials have not yet been performed in patients with SLE. Here we review the evolution of DORIS remission and LLDAS definitions and the evidence supporting the positive clinical outcomes following DORIS remission or LLDAS attainment, before discussing considerations for implementation of these outcome measures as potential T2T objectives. Adoption of DORIS remission and LLDAS treatment goals may result in favorable patient outcomes compared with established standard of care for patients with SLE.

Impact of low disease activity, remission, and complete remission on flares following tapering of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematous: a multinational cohort study.

Targets of treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) include the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), remission, and complete remission. Whether treatment can be tapered after attaining these targets and whether tapering is safer in patients in complete remission compared with LLDAS are unknown. We aimed to assess the odds of disease flares after treatment tapering in stable disease, versus continuing the same therapy. We also aimed to examine whether tapering in complete remission resulted in fewer flares or longer time to flare compared with tapering in LLDAS or remission. This multinational cohort study was conducted at 25 sites across 13 Asia-Pacific countries. We included adult patients aged 18 years or older with stable SLE who were receiving routine clinical care, had two or more visits and had attained stable disease at one or more visits. We categorised stable disease into: LLDAS (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2K] score ≤4, Physician Global Assessment [PGA] ≤1, and prednisolone ≤7·5 mg/day); Definitions of Remission in SLE (DORIS) remission (clinical SLEDAI-2K score 0, PGA <0·5, and prednisolone ≤5 mg/day); or complete remission on therapy (SLEDAI-2K score 0, PGA <0·5, and prednisolone ≤5 mg/day). Stable disease categories were mutually exclusive. Tapering was defined as any decrease in dose of corticosteroids or immunosuppressive therapy (mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, azathioprine, leflunomide, or methotrexate). Using multivariable generalised estimating equations, we compared flares (SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index) at the subsequent visit after drug tapering. We used generalised estimating equations and Cox proportional hazard models to compare tapering attempts that had begun in LLDAS, remission, and complete remission. Between May 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2020, 4106 patients were recruited to the cohort, 3002 (73·1%) of whom were included in our analysis. 2769 (92·2%) participants were female, 233 (7·8%) were male, and 2636 (88·1%) of 2993 with ethnicity data available were Asian. The median age was 39·5 years (IQR 29·0-50·0). There were 14 808 patient visits for patients in LLDAS, or remission or complete remission, of which 13 140 (88·7%) entered the final multivariable model after excluding missing data. Among the 9863 visits at which patients continued the same therapy, 1121 (11·4%) flared at the next visit, of which 221 (19·7%) were severe flares. Of the 3277 visits at which a patient received a tapering of therapy, 557 (17·0%) flared at the next visit, of which 120 (21·5%) were severe flares. Tapering was associated with higher odds of flare compared with continuing the same therapy (odds ratio [OR] 1·24 [95% CI 1·10-1·39]; p=0·0005). Of 2095 continuous tapering attempts, 860 (41·1%) were initiated in LLDAS, 596 (28·4%) in remission, and 639 (30·5%) in complete remission. Tapering initiated in LLDAS (OR 1·37 [95% CI 1·03-1·81]; p=0·029) or remission (1·45 [1·08-1·94]; p=0·013) had higher odds of flare in 1 year compared with complete remission. Tapering in LLDAS (hazard ratio 1·24 [95% CI 1·04-1·48]; p=0·016) or remission (1·30 [1·08-1·56]; p=0·0054) had a significantly shorter time to first flare than tapering initiated in complete remission. Attaining sustained LLDAS, remission, or complete remission for at least 6 months just before the time of taper was associated with lower odds of flare at next visit, flares in 1 year, and longer time to flare. Tapering of corticosteroids or immunosuppressive therapy in patients with stable SLE was associated with excess flares. Our findings suggest that drug tapering should be carefully considered, weighing the risks and benefits, and is best exercised in complete (clinical and serological) remission and after maintaining stable disease for at least 6 months. AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lily, Janssen, Merck Serono, GSK, and UCB.

Viewpoint on anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and a high unmet need in clinical practice

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterised by unpredictable flares. Many patients with SLE are unable to achieve the recommended treatment goal of remission or the intermediate,...

Risk Assessment Model for Postpartum Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

This article assesses the application of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk model on a cohort of postpartum patients with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This is a secondary analysis of an ongoing patient registry of women with SLE from 2016 to 2022. There were 49 SLE patients with 55 pregnancies using the Definitions of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria to determine SLE disease activity. RCOG risk assessment model scoring was calculated for each patient prior to and after delivery. The primary outcome was the qualification of "active SLE" by standard rheumatologic criteria and assessment of recommendations for VTE prophylaxis based on RCOG VTE risk assessment scoring. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U test with significance defined as p < 0.05. In the study cohort, 34 pregnancies (61.8%) were in DORIS remission at delivery. Twenty-one pregnancies (38.2%) were not and scored 3 points on the RCOG VTE risk model. Of these pregnancies, only 19% (n = 4) were recommended for VTE prophylaxis by the obstetrical provider despite RCOG score ≥3. Only 35.7% (n = 5) of pregnancies in DORIS remission, but with 3 points for non-SLE-related VTE risk factors (n = 14), were recommended for VTE prophylaxis. Of the 20 pregnancies in remission with an RCOG score < 3 after assessing all risk factors, 15% (n = 3) were nevertheless recommended for VTE prophylaxis. No patients had a postpartum VTE regardless of therapy. These data reveal a need to improve upon providing postpartum VTE prophylaxis to SLE patients not in remission while also recognizing a diagnosis of SLE alone should not equate with active disease. Moreover, SLE patients in remission may still warrant VTE prophylaxis if other non-SLE-related risk factors are present. · Those with SLE are at increased risk for VTE postpartum.. · VTE prophylaxis should be instituted when clinically appropriate.. · Caution should be exercised in broadly assigning disease activity for SLE diagnosis only.. · This study supports VTE prophylaxis use in postpartum patients with SLE..

Impact of overweight and obesity on disease activity and remission in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune and inflammatory disease that requires treatment with hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoids are responsible for adverse effects such as increased weight, which can modify the severity and chronicity of autoimmune pathologies. To summarize scientific evidence regarding the impact of overweight and obesity on disease activity and remission in SLE. The protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) and published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (PROSPERO-CRD42021268217). PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar will be searched for observational studies including adult patients with SLE who were overweight and obese or not, that included disease activity or remission as outcomes. The search is planned for May 2023. Three independent authors will select the eligible articles and extract their data. Subsequently, three authors will independently extract data from each included study using an extraction form created by the researchers. Methodological quality analyses will be performed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The results will be presented as a narrative synthesis according to the synthesis without a meta-analysis reporting guideline (SWiM). Meta-analysis will be conducted where appropriate using random-effects models. This review will identify the impact of overweight and obesity on the clinical features of SLE, helping clinicians manage disease activity and remission, both important to optimize disease outcomes and patient quality of life.

Risk Assessment Model for Postpartum Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Background Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) may be at increased risk for developing a venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly in the postpartum period. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guideline for postpartum VTE prophylaxis is often used to triage which patients should get VTE prophylaxis. In this RCOG guideline, a score ≥ 3 drives a formal recommendation for postpartum anticoagulation. RCOG is unique in its inclusion of “active SLE” as an actionable VTE risk factor (adding 3 points). We sought to determine if a cohort of postpartum patients with a known history of SLE a) qualify as having “active” SLE by standard rheumatologic criteria b) have other risk factors for VTE c) received the recommended prophylaxis based on RCOG VTE risk assessment scoring and d) had a postpartum VTE. Objective To assess the application of the RCOG venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk model on a cohort of postpartum patients with a history of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Study Design This is a secondary analysis of an ongoing patient registry of women with SLE from 2016-2022. There were 49 SLE patients with 55 pregnancies using Definitions of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria to determine SLE disease activity. RCOG risk assessment model scoring was calculated for each patient prior to and after delivery. The primary outcome was the qualification of “active SLE” by standard rheumatologic criteria and assessment of recommendations for VTE prophylaxis based on RCOG VTE risk assessment scoring. Data were analyzed using Fisher’s Exact test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U test with significance defined as p&lt;0.05. Results In the study cohort, 34 pregnancies (61.8%) were in DORIS remission at delivery. Twenty-one pregnancies (38.2%) were not and scored 3 points on the RCOG VTE risk model. Of these pregnancies, only 19% (n=4) were recommended for VTE prophylaxis by the obstetrical provider despite RCOG score ≥ 3. Only 35.7% (n=5) of pregnancies in DORIS remission, but with 3 points for non-SLE related VTE risk factors (n=14), were recommended for VTE prophylaxis. Of the 20 pregnancies in remission with an RCOG score &lt; 3 after assessing all risk factors, 15% (n=3) were nevertheless recommended for VTE prophylaxis. No patients had a postpartum VTE regardless of therapy. Conclusion These data reveal a need to improve upon providing postpartum VTE prophylaxis to SLE patients not in remission while also recognizing a diagnosis of SLE alone should not equate with active disease. Moreover, SLE patients in remission may still warrant VTE prophylaxis if other non-SLE-related risk factors are present.

Remission and low disease activity in Polish patients with systemic lupus erythematosus - real-life, five-year follow-up outcomes.

Remission in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) are associated with less organ damage and thus create new perspectives for effective damage-limiting treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of remission defined by The Definition of Remission In SLE (DORIS) and of LLDAS as well as their predictors in the Polish SLE cohort. In this retrospective study data were collected on patients with SLE that achieved at least one year of DORIS remission or LLDAS and were followed up for 5 years. Clinical and demographic data were gathered; DORIS and LLDAS predictors were determined by univariate regression analysis. The full analysis set included 80 patients at baseline and 70 at follow-up. Over half of patients with SLE (39; 55.7%) fulfilled the DORIS remission criteria. In this group, 53.8% (21) of patients were in remission on-treatment and 46.1% (18) in remission off-treatment. LLDAS was fulfilled by a cohort of 43 (61.4%) patients with SLE. Among patients that achieved DORIS or LLDAS at follow-up, 77% were not treated with glucocorticoids (GCs). The most important predictors for DORIS and LLDAS off-treatment were mean SLEDAI-2K score with cut-off of ≤8.0, treatment with mycophenolate mofetil or antimalarials, and the age at disease onset above 43 years. Remission and LLDAS are achievable goals in treating SLE as over half of study patients fulfilled the DORIS remission and LLDAS criteria. The identified predictors for DORIS and LLDAS indicate the importance of effective therapy leading to reduction of GC use.

Can lupus low disease activity state predict mortality in patients with SLE?

Since 2000, our ability to measure systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from a diagnostic, assessment, and prognostic standpoint has advanced substantially. These advances include the incorporation of the SLE Disease Activity Index, the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group, and their composite indices in clinical trials. Additional benchmarks, such as the Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) framework and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), have been used to evaluate disease activity and attainment of remission.

Long-Term Clinical Outcome in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Followed for More Than 20 Years: The Milan Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Consortium (SMiLE) Cohort.

Tackling active disease to prevent damage accrual constitutes a major goal in the management of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patients with early onset disease or in the early phase of the disease course are at increased risk of developing severe manifestations and subsequent damage accrual, while less is known about the course of the disease in the long term. To address this issue, we performed a multicentre retrospective observational study focused on patients living with SLE for at least 20 years and determined their disease status at 15 and 20 years after onset and at their last clinical evaluation. Disease activity was measured through the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) tool and late flares were defined as worsening in one or more BILAG domains after 20 years of disease. Remission was classified according to attainment of lupus low-disease-activity state (LLDAS) criteria or the Definitions Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) parameters. Damage was quantitated through the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index (SLICC/ACR-DI). LLAS/DORIS remission prevalence steadily increased over time. In total, 84 patients had a late flare and 88 had late damage accrual. Lack of LLDAS/DORIS remission status at the 20 year timepoint (p = 0.0026 and p = 0.0337, respectively), prednisone dose ≥ 7.5 mg (p = 9.17 × 10−5) or active serology (either dsDNA binding, low complement or both; p = 0.001) were all associated with increased late flare risk. Late flares, in turn, heralded the development of late damage (p = 2.7 × 10−5). These data suggest that patients with longstanding SLE are frequently in remission but still at risk of disease flares and eventual damage accrual, suggesting the need for tailored monitoring and therapeutic approaches aiming at effective immunomodulation besides immunosuppression, at least by means of steroids.

2022 Systemic lupus erythematosus remission in clinical practice. Message for Polish rheumatologists.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complicated multiorgan disease and can lead to organ damage and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The strategy of management while avoiding complications, especially caused by chronic glucocorticoid therapy, improves outcomes. Different definitions of the treatment goal in different configurations of lupus activity indexes have appeared over the years. In 2021 the definition of remission and recommendations for its achievement were published and it become a way to implement a treat-to-target strategy. The main goal of treatment has become DORIS (definition of remission in SLE) remission and the alternative LLDAS (low lupus disease activity state).Prolonging remission with clinical and immunological lupus activity restrictions and minimizing or stopping steroid doses reduced flares and damage accrual. The analysis and neutralization of poor prognosis predictive factors in lupus could be the most beneficial for less morbidity and mortality and better quality of life.

Pregnancy outcomes between pregnant systemic lupus erythematosus patients with clinical remission and those with low disease activity: A comparative study.

This study aims to compare pregnancy outcomes between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients who attained clinical remission based on the Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) and those with lupus low disease activity based on Low Lupus Disease Activity State (LLDAS). Between January 1993 and June 2017, a total of 90 pregnancies (one twin pregnancy) from 77 patients (mean age: 26.9±4.8 years; range, 17.9 to 37.3 years) were included in the study. The clinical remission and the LLDAS groups were modified into modified clinical remission and LLDAS groups, respectively by omitting Physician Global Assessment (PGA). The clinical SLE disease activity index (cSLEDAI) score was used for LLDAS. Pregnancies in 49 patients occurred, when they were in modified clinical remission and in 57 in modified LLDAS. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics, disease activity, or medication received at conception between the two groups. Pregnancy outcomes were similar between the modified clinical remission and the modified LLDAS groups in terms of successful pregnancy (83.67% vs. 84.21%), full-term births (38.78% vs. 38.60%), fetal losses (16.33% vs. 15.79%), spontaneous abortions (14.29% vs. 14.04%), small for gestational age infants (18.37% vs. 19.30%), low birth weight infants (42.86% vs. 40.35%), maternal complications (46.94% vs. 49.12%), and maternal flares (36.73% vs. 40.35%). The agreement of pregnancy outcomes was very high between the two groups (91.11% agreement). Pregnancy outcomes in SLE patients who achieved modified clinical remission and modified LLDAS were comparable.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) enables accurate and user-friendly definitions of clinical remission and categories of disease activity

ObjectivesThere is an unmet need for accurate and user-friendly definitions of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and remission. We aimed to derive and validate the SLE Disease Activity Score...

Predicting lupus low disease activity state and remission in SLE: novel insights

ABSTRACT Introduction:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with extreme heterogeneity, which sometimes may be life-threatening. Principles of treat to target (T2T) in SLE were put forward more recently, leading to better long-term survival and reduced damage accrual. Areas covered: Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and remission are currently the most widely accepted principal goals of SLE-T2T recommendations. In this article, we will deliver the novel insights into the definitions of LLDAS/remission, attainability, and, most importantly, clinical predictors of LLDAS and remission in SLE. Expert opinion: Since the release of the LLDAS and the framework on definitions of remission in SLE, there has been much evidence of a correlation between target attainment or maintenance and better prognosis. In the meantime, researchers are searching for predictors of target attainment. Noteworthy, prospective randomized trials are lacking worldwide to verify the benefits of T2T in various aspects of SLE. The most essential issue is that the optimal definition of the therapeutic target for SLE remains controversial, particularly regarding the maintenance dose of prednisone, the need for immunosuppressive withdrawal, and the requirement for serologic conversion. How to implement T2T principles in clinical practice also needs further investigation.

Long-term remission in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Remission has been introduced as a desirable outcome and the primary target of treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The purpose of this study was to identify the number of patients in remission and the long-term outcome of the disease and their predictors. Of the 379 patients in our SLE Database, a total of 193 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Remission was definition according to the definitions of remission in SLE. Three levels of remission were defined, including remission on-treatment, remission off-treatment and complete remission. In addition, we have defined a sustained remission for each level of remission in which the remission should last at least 5years. During a median follow-up of 96months, remission on-treatment and off-treatment, and complete remission were obtained in 49.2%, 38.9% and 19.2% of patients, respectively. Predictors of remission on-treatment in multivariate regression analysis were adherence to therapy and remission induction during 6months after treatment. Predictors of remission off-treatment were age ≥40 at the time of analysis and remission induction during 6months after treatment. Poor outcome (SLE Damage Index ≥1) was observed in 28% of the patients. Age at disease onset <30, kidney and nervous system involvement and SLEDAI-2K≥11 at the cohort entry were the risk factors of poor outcome in multivariate analysis. However, sustained remission on-treatment had a negative association with poor outcome. Treatment with glucocorticoids, antimalarials, immunosuppressants and biologics in sequential or in combination may cause durable remission. Patients with durable remission have significantly lower organ damage.