Remission Of Steroid-resistant Nephrotic Syndrome Research Articles

Higher Baseline Integrin Beta-1 Level Associated with Possible Increase in the Remission of Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome Using Cyclophosphamide Treatment

Higher Baseline Integrin Beta-1 Level Associated with Possible Increase in the Remission of Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome Using Cyclophosphamide Treatment

Rituximab for troublesome cases of childhood nephrotic syndrome.

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is the most common glomerular disease of childhood. Steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome present challenges in their pharmaceutical management; patients may need several immunosuppressive medication for optimum control, each of which medication has its own safety profile. Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody that targets B cells and has been used successfully for management of lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis. Recent clinical studies showed that rituximab may be an efficacious and safe alternative for the treatment of complicated nephrotic syndrome. In this review article, we aim to review the efficacy and safety of RTX therapy in nephrotic syndrome. We reviewed the literature pertaining to this topic by searching for relevant studies on PubMed and Medline using specific keywords. The initial search yielded 452 articles. These articles were then examined to ensure their relevance to the topic of research. We focused on multicenter randomized controlled trials with relatively large numbers of patients. A total of 29 articles were finally identified and will be summarized in this review. The majority of clinical studies of RTX in complicated pediatric NS showed that rituximab is effective in approximately 80% of patients with steroid-dependent NS, as it decreases the number of relapses and steroid dosage. However, RTX is less effective at achieving remission in steroid-resistant NS. RTX use was generally safe, and most side effects were transient and infusion-related. More randomized, double-blinded clinical studies are needed to assess the role of RTX in children with nephrotic syndrome.

Cyclosporin A is superior to cyclophosphamide in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome-a randomized controlled multicentre trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie.

First line immunosuppressive treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children is still open to discussion. We conducted a controlled multicentre randomized open label trial to test the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A (CSA) versus cyclophosphamide pulses (CPH) in the initial therapy of children with newly diagnosed primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and histologically proven minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangial hypercellularity. Patients in the CSA group (n = 15) were initially treated with 150 mg/m(2) CSA orally to achieve trough levels of 120-180 ng/ml, while patients in the CPH group (n = 17) received CPH pulses (500 mg/m(2) per month intravenous). All patients were on alternate prednisone therapy. Patients with proteinuria >40 mg/m(2) per hour at 12 weeks of therapy were allocated to a non-responder protocol with high-dose CSA therapy or methylprednisolone pulses. At week 12, nine of the 15 (60%) CSA patients showed at least partial remission, evidences by a reduction of proteinuria <40 mg/h per m(2). In contrast, three of the 17 (17%) CPH patients responded (p < 0.05, intention-to-treat). Given these results, the study was stopped, in accordance with the protocol. After 24 weeks, complete remission was reached by two of the 15 (13%) CSA and one of the 17 (5%) CPH patients (p = n.s.). Partial remission was achieved by seven of the 15 (46%) CSA and two of the 15 (11%) CPH patients (p <0.05). Five patients in the CSA group and 14 patients in the CPH group were withdrawn from the study, most of them during the non-responder protocol. The number of adverse events was comparable between both groups. We conclude that CSA is more effective than CPH in inducing at least partial remission in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children.

Remission of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome due to focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis using rituximab

Therapeutic options are limited in cases of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) that fail to respond to steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. We describe a case in which steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) secondary to FSGS did not respond to conventional treatment, but was successfully treated with rituximab. Unlike previous reports in which rituximab was used in conjunction with a calcineurin inhibitor, we present the first case where rituximab was used as the sole therapeutic agent. An 11-month-old boy presented with severe manifestations of primary nephrotic syndrome with a subsequent non-responsive steroid course. A renal biopsy confirmed FSGS, with normal staining for podocin and nephrin. Genetic studies for podocin were normal. The child developed ciclosporin-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and the response to plasma exchange, following ciclosporin withdrawal, was only temporary. A trial of a combination of mycophenolate and dexamethasone did not have any effect on proteinuria or fluid status. Four weekly rituximab infusions at 375 mg/m2/dose induced a complete remission without any adverse effects. This case suggests that rituximab may be used as the sole therapeutic agent in the treatment of SRNS secondary to FSGS, especially in cases where calcineurin inhibitors are contraindicated.