Art history situates the artwork within categories of time, place, and style. In special cases, works of art exceed these categories. The masterpiece is the work which surpasses categorisation. The work of art of universal significance is another. Rembrandt has been positioned and repositioned in the history of art. Today, Rembrandt resides in the firmament alongside those other (mostly Renaissance, mostly male) artists we know by their first names. The Rembrandt Research Project has ended its long, rather contentious labour of authenticating the paintings and Ernst van de Wetering's monumental survey, Rembrandt's Paintings Revisited (Springer, Dordrecht, 2014), has presented substantial reattributions and perhaps more importantly for art history, it has helped to shift the focus from connoisseurship to ‘processes’ of artistic creation, the evidence of contemporary texts and the analysis of painting technique.1 The exhibition in 2014 of Rembrandt's late works organised by the National Gallery, London, and the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, of approximately ninety paintings, prints, and drawings from the early 1650s to the artist's death in 1669 (more were included in the second venue in Amsterdam), and the publication in the same year of Richard Verdi's monograph, Rembrandt's Themes: Life into Art, present an artist of the first rank. They focus on the artist's themes, including elemental themes of life and death, to argue for the universal significance of Rembrandt's art.