RelyX Unicem Aplicap Research Articles

Comparison of retention of monolithic zirconia crowns with alumina airborne-particle abraded and nonabraded intaglio using three different cements: A clinical simulation

The necessity of roughening the intaglio surface of zirconia crowns to achieve adequate retention is unclear. The purpose of this clinical simulation study was to evaluate the retention of airborne-particle-abraded and nonabraded monolithic zirconia crowns using 3 different cement types. Extracted human molars were used and prepared with a 10-degree taper. Impressions were made of the prepared teeth with a polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) material, and dies were made with Type 4 gypsum. Each die was scanned with a NobelProcera 1G Scanner, and the standard tessellation language (STL) files were transferred electronically to the Nobel Biocare production site, where a bar was added virtually on top of each crown and parameters were set for milling. Seventy-two Procera zirconia crowns were generated, of which half were airborne-particle abraded on the intaglio surface with 50-µm alumina particles at 400 to 500 kPa for 15 seconds. The other 36 received no intaglio treatment other than cleaning. Both groups of 36 crowns were divided into 3 subgroups of 12 specimens. The area of each preparation was calculated using a computer-aided design software program. The specimens were distributed to attain similar mean surface areas among the cementation groups. The crowns were cemented onto the specimen with a controlled force of 196N. The 3 cements used were self-adhesive, modified resin RelyX Unicem Aplicap, resin-modified glass ionomer RelyX Luting, and a composite resin, Panavia F2.0 with ED Primer A & B. All specimens were thermocycled (5 °C to 55 °C) for 5000 cycles and then removed axially with a universal testing machine (Instron Model 5585H) at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. The removal force was recorded, and stress of dislodgement was calculated for each crown. A 2-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses. The type of failure was analyzed with the chi-squared test of association for independent samples (α=.05 for all tests). The mean dislodging force for crowns with airborne-particle abraded intaglio was 5.4MPa, which was statistically greater than the mean of 3.2MPa for nonabraded specimens (P<.001). No significant differences related to the dislodging stresses were detected among the 3 cements (P=.109). The mode of failure was similar whether abraded or not, with 50% of specimens retaining cement in the crown after separation. Alumina airborne-particle abrasion of the intaglio of zirconia to create surface roughness is beneficial in retaining the crowns, regardless of the cement type. The nonabraded crowns demonstrated significantly lower retentive stress with crown removal. The principal mode of failure was similar whether the zirconia intaglio was airborne-particle abraded or not. The most common mode of failure (>50% of specimens) was at least three-fourths of the cement remaining within the crown.

Bonding Strength of Lithium Disilicate Adhesive Crowns with Different Occluso-Cervical Preparation Heights and Cement Types

The aim of this study was to evaluate if adhesion technology with CAD/CAM can compensate for the reduction of occluso cervical preparation heights using different types of dental cement. The de-bonding failure types were then assessed. Here, 72 caries-free extracted human premolar teeth were prepared to have a remaining occlusal height of two, three, and four mm. IPS e.max lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns were cemented with adhesive resin cement Panavia SA, self-adhesive resin cement, RelyX Unicem Aplicap, and zinc phosphate cement. The cementation techniques were based on the manufacturer’s instructions. After thermocycling, all samples were tested for tensile bond strength via an Instron machine. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc testing (P &lt; 0.05) was performed. The means TBS for the two, three, and four-mm OCHP groups were 2.72±0.69, 3.06±0.82, and 3.25±0.79.0 MPa; ARC, SARC, and ZPC were 3.41±0.51, 3.45±0.41, 2.08±0.35 MPa, respectively with significant differences in both. The mixed cement had failures in the resin cement groups. Failure was predominantly cohesive in the zinc phosphate group. Resin cement had the highest SBS values versus ZPC values when both bonded to lithium disilicate crowns with different occlusal heights. The failure of the adhesive to the crown and/or to the tooth were the highest for the four types of resin cement. Around 25% were cohesive failures with resin cement, but this was predominately adhesive in crowns in zinc phosphate regardless of the preparation heights.

Evaluation of radiopacities of CAD/CAM restorative materials and resin cements by digital radiography.

This study aims to compare the radiopacities of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) blocks and the adhesive cements used for their bonding. 1 ± 0.2 mm thick specimens were obtained from six different CAD/CAM blocks (Incoris TZI, IPS e.max CAD, Vita Mark II, Cerasmart, Vita Enamic, and Vita Suprinity), four different adhesive resin cements (Panavia F2.0, Variolink Esthetic DC, RelyX Unicem Aplicap, G-CEM LinkAce), and a tooth. Radiographs of the specimens from each group, a tooth section, and an aluminum (Al) step-wedge were acquired. The radiopacity values of the materials were calculated as equivalents of Al thickness using the gray level values. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. All the materials except Cerasmart and Vita Enamic had significantly higher radiopacity values than dentin (p < 0.05). Of the assessed blocks, the highest radiopacity value was observed in Incoris TZI, and the lowest radiopacity value was observed in Vita Enamic. Variolink Esthetic DC and RelyX Unicem Aplicap showed significantly higher radiopacity (p < 0.05) than the other adhesive cements, including enamel and dentin. In this study, the majority of the CAD/CAM materials and all the adhesive resin cements were found to have sufficient radiopacity for prosthetic restorations according to the criteria set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). From a clinical and biological point of view, materials should be chosen according to their radiopacity and other properties, such as biocompatibility and esthetics. If the selected restorative CAD/CAM blocks have a radiopacity value less than or equal to dentin, cements with higher radiopacity values are recommended to facilitate radiological diagnoses for periphery and interface of restorations.

Evaluation of Intra Root Canal Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Irradiation on Prosthetic Post Adherence.

In clinical prosthetics procedures, including endodontics and post fixation, the presence of a smear layer can reduce the post bond strength. An Er,Cr:YSGG laser, which emits at 2780 nm, can promote a smear-layer-free surface due to the ablation process. Considering these aspects, the purpose of this work was to evaluate the influence of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation using either a radial or an axial fiber tip on the bond strength of three resin cements to the fiber-reinforced composite posts. Ninety recently extracted single rooted human teeth had their root canal instrumented and were randomly distributed into nine experimental groups, in which three resin cements (total-etching Variolink II, self-etching Panavia F, and self-adhesive RelyX Unicem Aplicap) and three root canal treatments (no treatment, laser irradiation using the radial fiber tip, laser irradiation using the axial fiber tip) were used. Specimens were then sectioned into three sections (cervical, middle, and apical thirds) with two slices on each section. A push-out test was performed on each slice, and the values were recorded as MPa. The push-out data were analyzed by a Ryan-Joiner normality test followed by a two-way ANOVA test and Tukey pairwise comparison. The statistical analysis was performed on each third section separately, with a 5% significance level. Laser irradiation with axial fiber tip significantly increased the post bond strength of RelyX Unicem Aplicap on middle third of specimens (p<0.001) when compared to other root canal treatments (unlased or irradiated with radial tip). Considering the Panavia resin cement, laser irradiation with either axial or radial tips promoted a significant increase on the post bond strength of middle third when compared to unlased specimens (p < 0.001); however, laser irradiation did not influence the post bond strength of Variolink resin cement. The use of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser for clinical prosthetics procedures enhances the post bond strength of Panavia and RelyX Unicem Aplicap resin cements, mainly at middle third of roots, and does not interfere with the bond strength of Variolink resin cement. For the RelyX Unicem Aplicap system, the use of axial tip is most advantageous and can be recommended for future clinical application.

Effect of chemical etching solutions versus air abrasion on the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cement to IPS e.max ZirCAD with and without aging

This study evaluated the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia after various surface conditioning methods in non-aged and aged conditions. Zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) and resin composite blocks were obtained and randomly divided into four groups according to one of the following surface conditioning methods: C: No surface treatment (Control); AS: Air abrasion (50 µm Al2O3) at low pressure (0.2 MPa) plus silane (Monobond Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent); MC: Methylene chloride for 60 min; CE: Chemical etching solution at 100°C for 60 min. Surface roughness (Ra) measurements were performed on the control and conditioned zirconia specimens using a profilometer. Each conditioned zirconia block was bonded to its corresponding resin composite block using self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem Aplicap, 3M ESPE) under a load of 300 g. Half of the groups were tested without aging; the other half were tested after x6000 thermocycling. Sticks were obtained from bonded specimens and subjected to microtensile bond strength (MTBS) testing in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Failure types were classified after debonding. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α = 0.05). The highest mean Ra value was obtained in Group CE (0.52 µm), and the lowest in Group C (0.25 µm). Significantly lower MTBS test results were obtained in Group C, both in non-aged (17.4 ± 1.1 MPa) and aged (5.11 ± 0.5 MPa) conditions than in the other groups (34.6 ± 1.5 to 51.2 ± 1.1 MPa; 28.0 ± 0.9 to 49.5 ± 1.0 MPa in non-aged and aged conditions, respectively) (P < 0.05). Group CE presented the highest MTBS test results in both non-aged and aged conditions (51.2 ± 1.1 MPa and 49.5 ± 1 MPa, respectively) (P < 0.05). Failure types were predominantly adhesive in all groups before and after aging. After aging, less adhesive and more mixed and cohesive failures in cement were observed in Groups AS and CE than in the other groups. Chemical etching of zirconia may have potential use as a substitute for air abrasion as a surface conditioning method for zirconia.

Effects of sandblasting distance and angles on resin cement bonding to zirconia and titanium

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate effects of sandblasting distance and angles resin to zirconia and titanium bonding. MethodsDensely sintered zirconia and cp2 titanium specimens were prepared and randomly divided into groups, and then sandblasted with various distance (5mm, 10mm and 15mm) and angles (45°, 60°, 75° and 90°). After surface treatment, each specimen surface underwent a silane primer application (RelyX, 3M ESPE), followed by bonding of a resin cement (RelyX Unicem Aplicap, 3M ESPE). Then, each cylindrical resin stub (diameter 3.6mm×2mm) underwent a shear adhesive (bond) strength test and surface roughness evaluation. SEM evaluation and EDX analysis were used to observe surface properties of both zirconia and titanium samples. Results were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Turkey test (α=0.05). ResultsSurface roughness showed a significant difference amongst the different distances and angles for both the zirconia and titanium materials and these changes in surface roughness were evident in the SEM imaging photos. As for the adhesive strength, there was a significant difference in the adhesive strength for the titanium and zirconia with different angles. In general, 75° gives the best results although this is not significantly different from 90°. However, no significant difference was observed in changes of sandblasting distance for both materials. EDX analysis at the surface revealed elements carbon, oxygen, silicon, aluminum, and zirconia on the surface. ConclusionsSandblasting at various distance and angles contributes differences in surface roughness when it comes to both zirconia and titanium materials. Despite both 75° or 90° sandblasting angle could yield a sufficiently high adhesive strength for resin to titanium or zirconia bonding, sandblasting at 75° seems to be optimal to increase the adhesive strength.

Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns

Statement of problemBond stability between zirconia crowns and luting cement and between cement and dentin is a main concern; however, only limited evidence is available as to its longevity. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the retentive strengths of 7 self-adhesive cements (RelyX Unicem Aplicap, RelyX Unicem Clicker, RelyX Unicem 2 Automix, iCEM, Maxcem Elite, Bifix SE, SpeedCem), 2 adhesive cements with self-etch primers (Panavia 21, SEcure), 1 glass ionomer cement (Ketac Cem), 1 resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Meron Plus), and 1 zinc phosphate cement for luting zirconia crowns (LAVA) to extracted teeth after thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage. Material and methodsTwo-hundred-forty extracted human molars (2 treatments; n=10 per cement) were prepared in a standardized manner. All cements were used according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The intaglios of the crowns were treated with airborne-particle abrasion. After thermocycling (×5000, 5°C/55°C) with or without 1 year of water storage, the cemented ceramic crowns were removed by using a Zwick universal testing device. Statistical analyses were done with the Wilcoxon rank sum and the 2-independent-samples Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. ResultsMedian retentive strengths [MPa] for specimens thermocycled only/thermocycled with 1 year of water storage were as follows: Panavia 21: 1.7/2.5, SEcure: 3.0/3.0, RelyX Unicem Aplicap: 3.1/3.4, RelyX Unicem Clicker: 4.1/4.2, RelyX Unicem 2 Automix: 3.8/3.1, iCEM: 2.3/2.7, Maxcem Elite: 3.0/3.2, Bifix SE: 1.7/1.7, SpeedCem: 1.3/1.6, Meron Plus: 3.1/2.7, Ketac Cem: 1.4/1.4, and zinc phosphate cement: 1.1/1.6. Statistically significant differences were found only among specimens thermocycled only or thermocycled with 1-year water storage (P<.001). ConclusionsSignificant differences in retentive strengths were observed among cements after thermocycling only or thermocycling with 1 year of water storage, but not for the effect of the additional 1 year of water storage.

Bonding values of two contemporary ceramic inlay materials to dentin following simulated aging.

PURPOSETo compare the push-out bond strength of feldspar and zirconia-based ceramic inlays bonded to dentin with different resin cements following simulated aging.MATERIALS AND METHODSOcclusal cavities in 80 extracted molars were restored in 2 groups (n=40) with CAD/CAM feldspar (Vitablocs Trilux forte) (FP) and zirconia-based (Ceramill Zi) (ZR) ceramic inlays. The fabricated inlays were luted in 2 subgroups (n=20) with either etch-and-bond (RelyX Ultimate Clicker) (EB) or self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem Aplicap) (SA) resin cement. Ten inlays in each subgroup were subjected to 3,500 thermal cycles and 24,000 loading cycles, while the other 10 served as control. Horizontal 3 mm thick specimens were cut out of the restored teeth for push out bond strength testing. Bond strength data were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's comparisons at α=.05. The mode of ceramic-cement-dentin bond failure for each specimen was also assessed.RESULTSNo statistically significant differences were noticed between FP and ZR bond strength to dentin in all subgroups (ANOVA, P=.05113). No differences were noticed between EB and SA (Tukey's, P>.05) bonded to either type of ceramics. Both adhesive and mixed modes of bond failure were dominant for non-aged inlays. Simulated aging had no significant effect on bond strength values (Tukey's, P>.05) of all ceramic-cement combinations although the adhesive mode of bond failure became more common (60-80%) in aged inlays.CONCLUSIONThe suggested cement-ceramic combinations offer comparable bonding performance to dentin substrate either before or after simulated aging that seems to have no adverse effect on the achieved bond.

Effect of Resin Cement Mixing Method on the Retention Strength of a CAD/CAM Zirconia Crowns.

Several treatments have been suggested to improve the retention of zirconia-based restorations luted with different cements. Resin cements are believed to improve crown retention under certain circumstances. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of three cements with different mixing methods on the retention of CAD/CAM zirconia crowns. Thirty extracted human molars were randomly divided into three groups and prepared for all-ceramic crowns (6° taper, 4-mm height and a 1.2mm rounded shoulder finish line). A zirconia crown (Tizian CAD/CAM) was fabricated for each tooth. The crowns were air-abraded using airborne particles, adjusted, and cemented to the corresponding tooth with one of the following cements: Panavia F2 (PAN group), RelyX Unicem (UNH group) or RelyX Unicem Aplicap (UNA group). After 3,000 rounds of thermal cycling, retention was measured using a specific retentive jig and a universal testing machine. The retention strength was measured by dividing the retention force by the surface area of each tooth. The means of the pull-out test results for each group were compared using analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD test (α=0.05). The mode of failure was examined using a stereomicroscope. The mean retention value was 6.45 (0.34)MPa for the UNA group, 4.99MPa (0.47) for the UNH group, and 4.45 (0.39) for the PAN group; the differences among the three test groups were significant. A mixed failure was observed in 83.3% of specimens, while no cohesive failure occurred in the crowns. Within the limitations of the present study, of the three tested cements, Relyx Unicem Aplicap cement was associated with the highest retention force for Tizian zirconia crowns.

The effect of ceramic primer on shear bond strength of resin composite cement to zirconia: A function of water storage and thermal cycling

The authors investigated the use of ceramic primers combined with self-adhesive resin composite cements on the shear bond strength (SBS) to zirconia and compared them with one conventional resin composite cement.The authors divided zirconia substrates (N = 550) into three groups: RelyX Unicem Aplicap self-adhesive universal resin composite cement (3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.) (group A) (n = 220); G-CEM Capsule self-adhesive resin composite cement (GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium) (group B) (n = 220); and Panavia 21 with Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator and Clearfil SE Bond primer (n = 110) (Kuraray Dental, Tokyo) used as a standard comparison (SC). The authors examined the self-adhesive resin composite cements without (0) and with (1) the use of a ceramic primer. They measured SBS initially (37°C for three hours), after water storage (37°C for one, four, nine, 16 or 25 days) and after thermal cycling (5°C and 55°C for 1,500, 6,000, 13,500, 24,000 or 37,500 cycles). The authors analyzed data by using descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney test, the Kruskal-Wallis test and a χ(2) test.Application of a ceramic primer did not result in a negative impact on SBS. Specimens in the A1 group (that is, RelyX Unicem Aplicap with ceramic primer) exhibited significantly higher SBS before and after water storage and thermal cycling compared with specimens that were not treated with a primer. The self-adhesive resin composite cements combined with ceramic primer exhibited similar or higher SBS values compared with those in the SC group at each aging duration (that is, water storage and thermal cycling). With respect to G-CEM Capsule, the authors observed a significantly positive effect of the primer after nine and 16 days' water storage and after one and four days' thermal cycling. They observed predominantly adhesive failures.Ceramic primer in combination with self-adhesive resin composite cement demonstrated a positive effect on SBS to zirconia and should be used for cementation.Long-term adhesion to ceramic plays an important role in the longevity of dental restorations. Therefore, the authors recommend that clinicians use a ceramic primer when cementing zirconia restorations.

Effect of fiber post length and bone level on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

This study evaluated the combined influence of horizontal bone loss and post length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth (ETT). Twenty premolars were endodontically treated and divided into four groups of two different post insertion depths (5 and 7 mm) and two alveolar bone levels from cement-enamel junction (2 and 5 mm). After posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were cemented using a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem Aplicap) and cores were built up (Filtek Supreme XT Universal Restorative, 3M ESPE, USA), cobalt-chrome copings were luted to each prepared tooth. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling and mechanical loading until fracture occurred. Mean fracture loads (N) were 1,445±342.2 (2 mm bone level/5 mm depth), 1,516±413.4 (2 mm bone level/7 mm depth), 1,736.4±1113.8 (5 mm bone level/5 mm depth), 1,038.6±600.2 (5 mm bone level/7 mm depth). No significant differences were found. Therefore, bone level and post length did not seem to influence the fracture resistance of ETT.

Metal–ceramic crowns cemented with two luting agents: short-term results of a prospective clinical study

A prospective, randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial was performed to evaluate the cementation modes for metal-ceramic crowns. A total of 40 fully veneered metal-ceramic crowns were delivered in the posterior jaw segments of 20 patients using either a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem Aplicap, 3M ESPE; n = 20) or a zinc oxide phosphate cement (Hoffmann's Cement, Hoffmann; n = 20). Thirteen parameters related to the abutment teeth and their periodontal status were evaluated. A visual analog scale was used to assess the sensitivity of the abutment teeth by patient-based outcomes. Data were statistically analyzed by a single-classification ANOVA (α = 0.05) and logistic regression analysis. The results presented were obtained after a mean observation period of 1.8 years. The dropout rate was 0%. None of the abutment teeth exhibited secondary caries at the restoration margins. No significant differences were demonstrated between the luting agents based on visual analog scale (p > 0.05), hypersensitivity (OR = 1.31), abutment mobility (p > 0.05), or probing depths (p > 0.05). Based on the sulcus fluid flow rates, a significantly greater mean difference was obtained with zinc oxide phosphate cement than with self-adhesive resin cement (9.2 units; p = 0.0006). Significant differences between the baseline examination and the follow-up examinations for sulcus bleeding index (p = 0.0013) and plaque index (p < 0.0001) were observed regardless of the luting agent used. The two cement types showed scarcely any differences between the parameters investigated. The outcomes of cementing fully veneered metal-ceramic crowns were equally good with self-adhesive resin cement as with the clinically proven zinc oxide phosphate cement.

Bonding of Restorative Materials to Dentin With Various Luting Agents

The aim was to compare eight types of luting agents when used to bond six indirect, laboratory restorative materials to dentin. Cylinders of the six restorative materials (Esteticor Avenir [gold alloy], Tritan [titanium], NobelRondo [feldspathic porcelain], Finesse All-Ceramic [leucite-glass ceramic], Lava [zirconia], and Sinfony [resin composite]) were ground and air-abraded. Cylinders of feldspathic porcelain and glass ceramic were additionally etched with hydrofluoric acid and were silane-treated. The cylinders were luted to ground human dentin with eight luting agents (DeTrey Zinc [zinc phosphate cement], Fuji I [conventional glass ionomer cement], Fuji Plus [resin-modified glass ionomer cement], Variolink II [conventional etch-and-rinse resin cement], Panavia F2.0 and Multilink [self-etch resin cements], and RelyX Unicem Aplicap and Maxcem [self-adhesive resin cements]). After water storage at 37°C for one week, the shear bond strength of the specimens (n=8/group) was measured, and the fracture mode was stereomicroscopically examined. Bond strength data were analyzed with two-factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Newman-Keuls' Multiple Range Test (α=0.05). Both the restorative material and the luting agent had a significant effect on bond strength, and significant interaction was noted between the two variables. Zinc phosphate cement and glass ionomer cements produced the lowest bond strengths, whereas the highest bond strengths were found with the two self-etch and one of the self-adhesive resin cements. Generally, the fracture mode varied markedly with the restorative material. The luting agents had a bigger influence on bond strength between restorative materials and dentin than was seen with the restorative material.

Assessment of marginal sealing in indirect resin composite restorations

The aim of this study was to evaluate the sealing of indirect resin restorations cemented with three different luting agents. Thirty bovine teeth were used. Box type cavities preparations were made in the middle third of the buccal face. The cavities were restored with inlay restorations by the direct/indirect technique using resin composite Resilab (Wilcos, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil). The teeth were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1: etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds, adhesive system Prime Bond 2.1 and Enforce resin cement (Dentsply, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil); Group 2: etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds, adhesive system Single Bond and RelyX ARC resin cement (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA); and Group 3: resin-modified glass ionomer cement RelyX Unicem Aplicap (Dentsply, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil). The indirect restorations were cemented with the respective cements and thermal cycled for 800 cycles. The specimens were stored in 50% silver nitrate dye for 24 hours, after this procedure the teeth were sectioned in the bucco-lingual direction into 3 slices of 1 mm thick, fixed on a glass slide and then analyzed by a stereomicroscope were was coupled a digital camera to register the images. From these pictures, the marginal leakage areas were measured by the software Image Tool 3.0. The data obtained were submitted to the ANOVA and Tukey tests. ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference (p=0.73) among groups (mean values(±SD): Group 1=0.96(±0.71); Group 2: 1.10(±0.63) and Group 3: 0.99(±0.35) . It was concluded that the 3 luting agents presented no significance regarding marginal microleakage, demonstrating similar performance in the proposed research situation.

Push-out bond strength of CAD/CAM-ceramic luted to dentin with self-adhesive resin cements

Objectives This study evaluated the initial and the artificially aged push-out bond strength between ceramic and dentin produced by one of five resin cements. Methods Two-hundred direct ceramic restorations (IPS Empress CAD) were luted to standardized Class I cavities in extracted human molars using one of four self-adhesive cements (SpeedCEM, RelyX Unicem Aplicap, SmartCem2 and iCEM) or a reference etch-and-rinse resin cement (Syntac/Variolink II) ( n = 40/cement). Push-out bond strength (PBS) was measured (1) after 24 h water storage (non-aged group; n = 20/cement) or (2) after artificial ageing with 5000 thermal cycles followed by 6 months humid storage (aged group; n = 20/cement). Nonparametrical ANOVA and pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with Bonferroni–Holm adjustment were applied for statistical analysis. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. In addition, failure mode and fracture pattern were analyzed by stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Results Whereas no statistically significant effect of storage condition was found ( p = 0.441), there was a significant effect of resin cement ( p < 0.0001): RelyX Unicem showed significantly higher PBS than the other cements. Syntac/Variolink II showed significantly higher PBS than SmartCEM2 ( p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between SpeedCEM, SmartCem2, and iCEM. The predominant failure mode was adhesive failure of cements at the dentin interface except for RelyX Unicem which in most cases showed cohesive failure in ceramic. Significance The resin cements showed marked differences in push-out bond strength when used for luting ceramic restorations to dentin. Variolink II with the etch-and-rinse adhesive Syntac did not perform better than three of the four self-adhesive resin cements tested.

Tensile bond strength of a so-called self-adhesive luting resin cement to dentin.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the bond strength and durability of a so-called self-adhesive resin luting cement to human dentin. In addition, the influence of a dentin adhesive system on the bond strength was tested. Forty-eight dentin disks from human teeth were divided into two groups of 24 specimens.One group was bonded to composite resin tubes with the self-adhesive luting cement (RelyX Unicem Aplicap, 3MESPE), in the other group the dentin surfaces were conditioned with a three-step dentin adhesive system (OptiBondFL, Kerr) prior to bonding with the same cement. Three subgroups of eight specimens each were tested for tensile bond strength following storage in 37°C tap water for either 3 days or for 150 days with an additional 37,500 thermal cycles either between 20°C and 40°C ("soft TC") or between 5°C and 55°C ("hard TC"). Statistical analyses were performed with the Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene's test, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparisons with the Scheff test. Without the dentin adhesive, the mean tensile bond strengths after 3 days were 7.1 ± 3.8 MPa; after 150 days/"soft TC" 6.8 + 3.6; and after 150 days/"hard TC" 5.3 + 4.5 MPa. With the dentin adhesive, the mean bond strengths after 3 days were 16.5 ± 5.5 MPa; after 150 days/"soft TC" 13.1 + 3.9 MPa; and after 150 days/"hard TC" 10.1 + 5.2 MPa. Regardless of storage conditions, the use of a dentin adhesive increased the tensile bond strength of a self-adhesive resin luting cement significantly in comparison to the use of the luting cement without adhesive.

Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength between dual-cured resin cements and zirconium-oxide ceramics

The present study evaluated the durability of bond strength between zirconia and 3 different resin cements. Thirty stabilized tetragonal zirconium-dioxide blocks were duplicated in dual-curing resin core build-up material specimens. Resin blocks were randomly luted to zirconium surfaces using 1) Clearfil Esthetic Cement (CLF), 2) RelyX Unicem Aplicap (RELX), or 3) Multilink Automix (MLA). After 24 h, half of the specimens from each of the 3 groups were loaded in tension until fracture (0.5 mm/min). The remaining half were tested after 6,000 thermal cycles (5 to 55°C). Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α = 0.05). Fractographic analysis was performed using a stereomicroscope. Tensile bond strength values were significantly affected by the luting agent system employed and by thermal aging (P < 0.001). The highest tensile bond strength values in non-thermal-aged groups were observed for specimens from the RELX and CLF groups. In contrast, in the thermal-aged groups, the highest tensile bond strength values were for the MLA and RELX groups. Moreover, while thermocycling significantly affected bond strengths in the RELX and CLF groups, the mean strength of the MLA group did not significantly change after aging. There was little difference in the distribution of failure modes in any group.

Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: A prospective clinical trial begun 2003

Objectives The literature demonstrates that conventional luting of metal-based restorations using zinc phosphate cements is clinically successful over 20 years. This study compared the clinical outcomes of metal-based fixed partial dentures luted conventionally with zinc phosphate and self-adhesive resin cement. Methods Forty-nine patients (mean age 54 ± 13 years) received 49 metal-based fixed partial dentures randomly luted using zinc phosphate (Richter & Hoffmann, Berlin, Germany) or self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem Aplicap, 3M ESPE, Germany) at the University Medical Center Regensburg. The core build-up material was highly viscous glass ionomer; the finishing line was in dentin. The study included 42 posterior, 5 anterior crowns and two onlays. Forty-seven restorations were made of precious alloys, 2 of non-precious alloys. The restorations were clinically examined every year. The clinical performance was checked for plaque (0–5; PI, Quigley-Hein), bleeding (0–4; PBI; Mühlemann) and attachment scores. The examination included pulp vitality and percussion tests. Statistics Means of scores, standard deviation, cumulative survival and complication rates were calculated using life tables. Results The mean observation time was 3.16 ± 0.6 years (min: 2.0; max: 4.5 years). During that time no restoration was lost, no recementation became necessary. One endodontic treatment was performed in the self-adhesive composite group after 2.9 years. At study end bleeding (1.44 RelyX Unicem vs. 1.25 zinc phosphate) and plaque (1.64 RelyX Unicem vs. 1.0 zinc phosphate) scores showed no statistically significant difference. Significance The self-adhesive resin cement performed clinically as well and can be used as easily as zinc phosphate cement to retain metal-based restorations over a 38-month observation period.

Effect of luting cement to push-out bond strength of fibre reinforced post

he objective of this study was to investigate the effect of various luting cement systems on bond strength of fibre-reinforced posts to root canal dentine. 40 extracted single rooted sound premolar teeth were root filled, decoronated and randomly divided into four groups. Fibre posts, Aestheti- Plus™ (Bisco,Inc. Schaumburg, IL, USA) were cemented using four luting cements: Group A (control): Elite 100® Zinc phosphate (GC Corp, Japan), Group B: Calibra ™ Esthetic Resin Cement (Dentsply Caulk, USA), Group C: RelyX ARC Adhesive Resin (3M ESPE), Group D: RelyX Unicem Aplicap (3M ESPE). Each root was sliced into 2 discs representing the coronal and middle portions of the root canal giving rise to 20 specimens per group. Bond strength was determined using push-out tests and data was analyzed using SPSS version 14.0. The mean bond strength of Group A to Aestheti-Plus™ post was 7.71 MPa (±2.51) and Group B was 5.69 MPa (±3.23). Group C exhibited the lowest mean bond strength, 4.29 MPa (±3.53) while the highest bond strength was obtained from Group D, 7.98 MPa (±2.61). One way ANOVA showed significant interaction between all groups (p=.OOI). Post-hoc Bonferroni test reve;iled that bond strength of Group C was significantly lower compared to Group A (p=.008) and D (p=.004). In conclusion, the mean bond strength of Aestheti- Plus™ post to root canal dentine was highest when cemented with RelyX Unicem resin cement followed by Elite 100® zinc phosphate cement, Calibra and RelyX ARC resin cements. However, the bond strengths of Cali bra and RelyX Unicem resin cements were not significantly different from Elite 100® zinc phosphate cement.

Comparison of regional bond strength in root thirds among fiber‐reinforced posts luted with different cements

To compare regional bond strength in different thirds of the root canal, among glass fiber-reinforced (FRC) endodontic posts luted with different cements, using the push-out test. Sixty extracted human anterior teeth were endodontically treated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. The crown portion was removed, and a dowel space was prepared. Prepared teeth were randomly assigned to one of six groups (n = 10) for luting glass FRC Postec posts, with one of the six cement systems (Ketac Cem Aplicap, Relyx Unicem Aplicap, Variolink II/Excite DCS, Panavia F/ED Primer, C&B cement/All-Bond 2, and Multilink/Multilink Primer A/B), using an alignment technique. Specimens were embedded in resin, and each root was sectioned into six 1-mm thick serial slices. A push-out test was performed to measure regional bond strengths and to identify the type of failure. The highest bond strength values were found in the cervical third and the lowest in the apical third. Highest values were obtained using Variolink II, Panavia F, and Multilink resin cements followed by C&B resin cement and Relyx Unicem ionomer resin cement; Ketac-cem ionomer cement showed the lowest value. Highest bond strength values were obtained in the cervical third and with resin cements.