In the course of three Congresses we have examined the arbitration regulations for settling disputes arising from the cornmercial relations of two worlds which have been in contact from time immemorial, yet do not know each other very well. They are two very different worlds. There is, first and foremost, an encounter between two great cultural areas, each with its own pronounced character, where modernity and tradition; moving at different speeds, vie with unequal arms for ascendancy. The Arab world in particular has a cultural shape which cannot be adapted to a foreign mould. There is also the encounter of two great areas which were already in contact but which until quite recently were linked by political relationships of a hierarchical nature. This is still reflected in the tendency of one to imitate the other's model. And lastly there is the encounter of two great areas which have realized that arbitration now stands ready and waiting to help them overcome difficulties and preserve confidence within their combined world of exchanges and co-operation. Confzdence. This is perhaps the key word. A sacred verse declares: Do justice. This is the act which comes closest to religious fervour. Justice is like an act of faith. So is arbitration. During the Helsinki Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe, continued in Madrid and Paris, the participants focused all their skills on devising confidence-building measures. Perhaps that is our task as well. We are recommending legislations which are more harmonious and especially more generous towards the autonomy of international arbitration. And, to maintain a lively hope, we are advocating a form of arbitration in which the composition of the tribunal, its seat, the applicable law, the language, even if they in themselves do not suffice to inspire confidence, at least do not provoke distrust. Thus we hope gradually to disarm the distrust latent in national judiciaries and legislatures. On opening this Congress, President Bellet gave a vivid account of the stages already traversed. Our two worlds are naturally reaching out for each other with what they are and with what they have. It seems to me that what first leapt to their attention was the barriers-existing in the mind even before existing in the laws which face arbitration in certain countries, the result of sometimes bitter experiences. The question of what
Read full abstract