Reliability Of Muscle Thickness Measurements Research Articles

Reliability of Shear Wave Elastography and Ultrasound Measurement in Children with Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy

In clinical practice, few data exist on the feasibility of performing reliable shear wave elastography (SWE) and ultrasonography (US) measurements in spastic muscles of children with cerebral palsy (CP). Ten children with unilateral CP took part in SWE and US assessment of the tibialis anterior and medialis gastrocnemius muscles during two sessions separated by a 1-wk interval. Intra- and inter-investigator reliability of shear modulus (µ) and muscle thickness (MT) measurements, at neutral and maximal dorsiflexion angles on both legs, was assessed by two investigators with different levels of experience. Reliability was assessed with the coefficient of variation (CV), standard error of measurement and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Reliability of the µ measurement was insufficient, regardless of angle position (CV >10% and >20% for neutral and maximal dorsiflexion angles, respectively). The intra- and inter-investigator reliability of MT measurements was good (CV >10%, ICC >0.74) for both muscles in both legs. SWE measurements must be performed using a rigorous standardized protocol while MT should be considered an important parameter to monitor change in muscle morphology.

Reliability of muscle thickness measurements in ultrasonography.

This study aims to clarify some of the issues associated with the reliable measurement of muscle thickness on ultrasonographic images of the musculoskeletal system, namely the repeatability of measurements in different time frames, the effect of body side selection, and the effect of scan orientation. Ultrasound scans were performed on muscles associated with essential daily activities: geniohyoid, masseter, anterior arm muscles, rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius. Measurements of the muscle thickness were performed and repeated after 1, 6, and 24 h, on both dominant and nondominant side, using both transverse and longitudinal scans. Thirteen healthy volunteers (eight males and five females, mean age = 24 years, SD = 2.86, range = 19-29) were included. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated between the baseline and the 1-, 6-, and 24-h interval, using a two-way mixed model of absolute agreement. The ICC ranged from 0.295 for the longitudinal scan of the left masseter muscle in the 6-h interval to 0.991 for the longitudinal scan of the nondominant anterior arm muscles in the 24-h interval. The results indicate that there is variable reliability of the measurements depending on the muscle, time frame, body side, and scan orientation. Consequently, the choice of these parameters can affect the validity of the measurements. Further investigation on a larger scale is required to establish the preferred parameters for each anatomical site.

Reliability of Thickness Measurements of the Abductor Hallucis Muscle Using the Spring Gauge Technique in Hallux Valgus Subjects: An Ultrasonographic Study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the intraand inter-rater reliability of muscle thickness (MT) measurements of the abductor hallucis (AbdH) in subjects with hallux valgus (HV), using ultrasonography performed at different inward pressures of approximately 0.5 kg, 1.0 kg, 1.5 kg, and 2.0 kg, with no pressure control. Methods: Thirty-two subjects with HV were recruited. The thicknesses of both sides of the AbdH were measured randomly by two different examiners for assessment of the intraand inter-rater reliability. The measurement values were analyzed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). ICC (2,1) was used to determine the inter-rater reliability of MT measurements of the AbdH, while ICC (3,1) was used to assess the intra-rater reliability. Results: The results showed higher ICC values for intra-rater reliability compared to inter-rater reliability, and the value for inter-rater reliability with no pressure control (ICC=0.74 [95%CI=0.53-0.87]) was smaller compared to pressures of 0.5 kg, 1.0 kg, 1.5 kg, and 2.0 kg. Other inward pressures for intraand inter-rater reliability also showed excellent values (ICC=0.86-0.96). Conclusion: The findings showed that maintaining consistent inward pressure is essential for reliable results in measurement of the MT of the AbdH by different examiners in a clinical setting.

Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasonographic imaging for muscle thickness measurement of the rhomboid major.

This study was to establish inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the rehabilitative ultrasonographic imaging (RUSI) technique for muscle thickness measurement of the rhomboid major at rest and with the shoulder abducted to 90°. Twenty-four young adults (eight men, 16 women; right-handed; mean age [±SD], 24·4 years [±2·6]) with no history of neck, shoulder, or arm pain were recruited. Rhomboid major muscle images were obtained in the resting position and with shoulder in 90° abduction using an ultrasonography system with a 7·5-MHz linear transducer. In these two positions, the examiners found the site at which the transducer could be placed. Two examiners obtained the images of all participants in three test sessions at random. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to estimate reliability. All ICCs (95% CI) were >0·75, ranging from 0·93 to 0·98, which indicates good reliability. The ICCs for inter-rater reliability ranged from 0·75 to 0·94. For the absolute value of the difference in the intra-examiner reliability between the right and left ratios, the ICCs ranged from 0·58 to 0·91. In this study, the intra- and interexaminer reliability of muscle thickness measurements of the rhomboid major were good. Therefore, we suggest that muscle thickness measurements of the rhomboid major obtained with the RUSI technique would be useful for clinical rehabilitative assessment.

Separate assessment of gluteus medius and minimus: B-mode or M-mode ultrasound?

The hip abductors gluteus medius (Gmed) and minimus (Gmin) differ slightly in function and how they are affected by hip joint pathology. A separate assessment of Gmed and Gmin is feasible by ultrasound (US) imaging. B-mode and M-mode US can be used to measure muscle thickness. Two B- and two M-mode scans of Gmed and Gmin thickness were taken in relaxation on 16 asymptomatic volunteers, repeated within 4 days on 11 subjects. Three types of intra-rater reliability of muscle thickness measurements were examined: (1) within-session reliability comparing two scans from the same session, (2) between-days reliability comparing thickness from two scanning occasion within 4 days and (3) reliability of taking thickness measurements by re-measuring the same US scans after 1 week. Thickness measurements on B- and M-mode images provided ICC3,1 >0.96 for within-session reliability. ICC3,k >0.89 for between-days reliability and ICC3,1 >0.85 for re-reading the same scans were estimated. Minimal detectable changes >1.0 mm within-session, >2.4 mm between-days and >1.7 mm for re-reading scans indicated that small thickness changes are not detectable. The investigation suggests a slight advantage for fascia recognition in B-mode and the advantage of visual control of muscle relaxation in M-mode.

Confiabilidade da medida de espessuras musculares pela ultrassonografia

OBJETIVO: Determinar a confiabilidade das medidas de espessuras dos músculos flexores e extensores do cotovelo e joelho pela ultrassonografia (US), quantificando o erro típico associado a essas medidas (ETM). MÉTODOS: A confiabilidade (duas medidas interdias) foi determinada em 15 voluntários aparentemente saudáveis (oito mulheres, 33,9 ± 11,4 anos, 76 ± 21kg, 170 ± 10cm). As imagens da musculatura flexora (FC) e extensora do cotovelo (EC) e flexora (FJ) e extensora do joelho (EJ) foram obtidas pela US bidimensional no modo B, utilizando transdutor de 7,5MHz. As espessuras do tecido muscular compreendidas entre as interfaces com o osso e com o tecido adiposo foram medidas em sítios anatômicos identificados e registrados para ser repetidos na segunda medida. RESULTADOS: A ANOVA não identificou diferenças significativas entre as medidas repetidas. Os coeficientes de correlação intraclasse foram FC = 0,970, EC = 0,971, FJ = 0,555 e EJ = 0,929 (P < 0,05 para todos). Os coeficientes de variação foram de 3,9%, 6,1%, 6,6 % e 4,6%, e os ETM 1,3mm, 1,6mm, 4,9mm e 1,9mm, respectivamente, para espessuras de FC, EC, FJ e EJ. A análise dos gráficos de Bland-Altman apontou que as variáveis não apresentaram erro heterocedástico. CONCLUSÃO: As medidas de espessuras musculares de FC, EC e EJ apresentaram alta confiabilidade, possibilitando seu uso para intervenções como programas de dieta, treinamento físico ou reabilitação. No entanto, o uso da medida de FJ não deve ser recomendada, pois mostrou baixa confiabilidade e alto ETM.