Fictions, Borders, and Madness Matthew Salafia (bio) Andrew K. Diemer, The Politics of Black Citizenship: Free African Americans in the Mid-Atlantic Borderland, 1817–1863. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2016. xii + 253pp. Figures, notes, bibliography, and index. $28.95. Kristen Epps, Slavery on the Periphery: The Kansas-Missouri Border in the Antebellum and Civil War Eras. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2016. xv + 265 pp. Figures, notes, bibliography, and index. $28.95 Kristen Epps and Andrew Diemer have made valuable contributions to our collective historical knowledge, and their books deserve to be read. These historians have completed a prodigious amount of research and have based their arguments on a careful analysis of sources. And the arguments of each are clear, focused, and carefully constructed. In short, the books fulfill all of the requirements necessary for a sound historical monograph. But just prior to accepting this book review, I read Sapiens (2015) by Yuval Noah Harari, which fundamentally altered the way I approached this essay. In his book, Harari suggests (but does not assert) that Homo sapiens became the dominant species on the planet because of our ability to create and believe fictions irrespective of objective reality. Harari's hypothesis is thought-provoking, but I am not sure that it is supposed to be convincing. It does, however, open up new paths to explore the meaning and relevance of history. If we pursue Harari's hypothesis further, then storytelling of all kinds takes on great significance. The stories we tell ourselves as Homo sapiens allow us to imagine a commonality that unites us as a species. Considering Benedict Anderson's argument in Imagined Communities (1983) adds depth to Harari's hypothesis by highlighting how stories emphasize sameness and difference. In all cases, though, sameness and difference exist in our collective consciousness. The stories we tell shape our understanding of the world and our place in it. One goal of my review is to analyze the histories written by Epps and Diemer as stories. These stories, then, are part of the more general human fiction of history. By thinking of these monographs as stories and the historical method itself a fiction, I was freed to consider the broader impacts and modern relevance of each book, and to widen my definition of "relevant [End Page 601] literature." The result is a review that veers off the traditional course but follows the meandering path of careful contemplation. With each cognitive leap, I headed further down the rabbit hole. In so doing, I searched for a place for the fictions of Epps and Diemer—and history more broadly—in our collective consciousness. As part of reviews, we are expected to analyze the works in light of relevant literature. It is typically assumed that "relevant literature" refers to the other historical monographs that situate the books within the field's historiography. But what if this set of constraints actually limits the potential cognitive leaps we can make if we reimagine our concept of what is relevant? What can we gain if we put Slavery on the Periphery into conversation with current events or even novels such as Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (1865)? The methods of Kristen Epps and Andrew Diemer differ from that of Lewis Carroll, certainly. Historians rely on the historical method: analysis of primary sources, deep contextualization, and careful argumentation. Epps and Diemer make excellent use of these organizing principles of the discipline. In their meticulously researched and carefully argued monographs, they strive for realism in the recreation of the past. In contrast, Lewis Carroll plays with language to craft an absurd (or curious) world in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. Yet both approaches provide their readers with fictions that they can use to shape their own reality. Take this conversation between Alice and the Cheshire Cat: Alice thought and she went on. 'Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?' "That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," said the Cat. "I don't much care where-" said Alice. "Then it doesn't matter which way you go," said the Cat. "-so long as I get somewhere." Alice added as...