Relative Value Units Research Articles

Increased individual workload for nuclear medicine physicians over the past years: 2008-2023 data from The Netherlands.

To investigate temporal trends in the individual workload of nuclear medicine physicians at a large tertiary care academic center between 2008 and 2023. This study analyzed the reporting workload of nuclear medicine physicians in a large tertiary care academic center in The Netherlands on 36 unique (randomly sampled) calendar days, for each year between 2008 and 2023. The average daily departmental workload (measured with relative value units) was calculated for each year between 2008 and 2023. The individual workload was calculated by dividing the average daily departmental workload in each year by the available full-time equivalent nuclear medicine physicians in each year. Mann-Kendall tests were used to assess for any temporal monotonic trends in individual workload and types of nuclear medicine procedures performed. Individual workload increased significantly between 2008 and 2023 (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.611, P = 0.001). Individual workload in 2023 was 86% higher than in 2008. The use of positron emission tomography (PET) increased significantly (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.912, P < 0.001) between 2008 and 2023. The use of diagnostic scintigraphy decreased significantly in the same period (Mann-Kendall tau of -0.817, P < 0.001). The use of DEXA also showed a significant decrease (Mann-Kendall tau of -0.467, P = 0.013), but this decrease was negligible on a relative scale. The number of therapeutic procedures (Mann-Kendall tau of -0.100, P = 0.626) remained statistically stable in this period. Our single-center study showed that the individual workload of nuclear medicine physicians has increased significantly between 2008 and 2023, driven by the rise in PET scans. The demand for both diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine procedures and associated workload is expected to keep on increasing in the foreseeable future. This workload trend should be taken into account by policymakers involved in nuclear medicine staffing planning. A healthy balance between the nuclear medicine workforce and workload is necessary to maintain the quality of care, to be able to perform other important (academic) tasks such as research, educating and training medical students and residents, and management, and to prevent physician burnout and dropout.

Knowledge and perception of dental educators regarding relative value units: A pilot study.

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the knowledge and perception among dental educators regarding the use of relative value units (RVUs) in medicine, perceived benefits in dentistry, and the relative ranking of the components to define RVUs in dentistry. A convenience sample of dental educators participating in the American Dental Education Association's Leadership Institute (2023-2024) cohort was surveyed for their knowledge and perception regarding RVUs. The responses were stratified based on experience with RVUs prior to statistical analyses (α=0.05). Twenty-six dental educators from 18 different North American dental schools and nine different dental specialties participated in this pilot study. Although not significant, a higher proportion of dental educators with prior experience perceived RVUs as a valuable tool in dental practice for assigning chair time, developing payment models, and tracking student-resident progress in a clinical course. There was a lack of consensus among dental educators regarding the components for determining dental procedural RVUs. This pilot study provides limited evidence that prior knowledge of RVUs may be related to its perceived benefits among dental educators, but a broader study design is needed to draw meaningful conclusions and universally acceptable components for determining RVUs in dentistry.

Perceptions of Lactation Experience Among Neurology Faculty and Impact of Lactation Time on Academic Achievement at U.S. Academic Medical Centers.

Objective: To investigate the perceptions of lactation experiences of neurology faculty and the impact of lactation time on academic achievement. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study utilizing a survey administered across 19 academic neurology centers in the United States. Respondents self-identified as having children and answered questions about lactation at work. Demographic information; academic achievement including publications, guest speakerships, awards, leadership roles, and funding; and perception of lactation experience were analyzed. Results: Among 162 respondents, 83% took lactation time at work. Thirty-seven percent reported lack of employer support for lactation, 46% were dissatisfied with their lactation experience, 59% did not receive compensation for lactation time, 62% did not have blocked clinical time, 73% reported relative value units were not adjusted to accommodate lactation, and 43% reported lack of access to private lactation space. Women spent on average 9.5 months lactating per child and desired 2.4 further months of lactation. There was no difference in all measures of self-reported academic achievement between women who did and did not take lactation time when measured across all career stages. Conclusions: Although a majority of respondents took lactation time at work, perceptions of employer support for lactation were low, and expectations for work productivity were not adjusted to accommodate lactation time. Taking lactation time at work did not decrease self-reported academic achievement. System-level best practices designed to support lactating faculty should be developed to guide academic institutions.

Opportunity Cost of Surgical Management of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: A Longitudinal Study.

Single-institution retrospective financial analysis. Trauma care is consistently linked to inadequate reimbursement, posing a significant financial burden for large trauma centers. Data show that declining Medicare reimbursement rates have indirectly led to declining payment for all procedures covered by insurance. The goals of this study are to investigate the opportunity cost associated with contemporary surgical management of CMF trauma at our institution and to evaluate longitudinal financial trends. Patients with operative facial fractures between 2015 and 2022 at Duke University Medical Center were included and compared to patients undergoing general otolaryngology, plastic surgery and oral surgery operations in the same period. Procedural codes, payor type, charges billed, collections, relative value units (RVUs) and other financial data were obtained and analyzed among the 2 patient populations. Comparative analysis was performed to assess the financial trends in data reported previously from 2007-2015. The collection rate at Duke University Medical Center for operatively managed CMF fractures remains significantly lower than non-CMF counterparts. Interestingly, the collection rate gap between CMF and non-CMF surgeries has narrowed when comparing to the data from 2007-2013. This is largely due to a decrease in collection rates for non-CMF procedures from 29.61% (2007-2013) to 26.57% (2015-2022) [P = 0.0001] and an increase in collection rates for CMF procedures from 17.25% (2007-2013) to 18.05% (2015-2022) [P = 0.0001]. Despite a slight improvement of the gap in reimbursement rates for CMF and non-CMF surgeries over the last several years, trauma care continues to have a negative financial impact on health care institutions.

Impact of 2023 Ventral Hernia Repair CPT Code Changes on Work Relative Value Units in a Tertiary Hernia Referral Center.

CPT codes for ventral hernia repair (VHR) changed in January 2023 to address the heterogeneity of procedures with a concomitant shift from a 90-day to a 0-day global period. This study reviews a tertiary referral center's experience with hernia coding comparing the work relative value units (wRVUs) generated for ventral hernia repair pre-2023 compared to post-2023. CPT codes were analyzed for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic VHR before updates to the CPT hernia codes (January 2022-September 2022) and following CPT change (January 2023-September 2023). Work RVU values were assigned based on nationally published values. CPT codes in 2022, CPT codes in 2023, 8 inpatient E&M codes, and 5 outpatient E&M codes were evaluated. 299 patients underwent VHR, 143 in 2022 and 156 in 2023. Average procedural VHR wRVUs increased from 9.6 in 2022 to 11.6 in 2023 (p<0.001). Procedures involving myofascial advancement flaps/component separation techniques (53.8% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.419) and wRVUs for the component separation procedures were similar between 2022 and 2023, respectively 17.7 vs 16.1 (p=0.419)]. The wRVUs associated with adjunctive procedures (mesh removal/placement) decreased from 3.3 to 0.6 (p<0.001) in the post-2023 era. Postoperative E&M wRVUs increased in 2023 for postoperative inpatient (0.48) and postoperative outpatient (0.39) services, compared to 0 wRVUs in 2022. Overall, the total management including follow-up clinic visit adjusted wRVUs for hernia repair was similar between 2022 and 2023, respectively 30.7 vs 29.2 (p=0.409). Procedural wRVUs for anterior abdominal hernia repair increased from 2022 to 2023 (p<0.001) at a tertiary referral medical center. However, total wRVUs, including the operation and postoperative visits, remained unchanged.

Impact of Nighttime Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit Staffing on Failure to Rescue and Revenue

Failure to rescue (FTR) is mortality following postoperative complication. We investigated the impact of nighttime intensivist staffing and FTR after cardiac surgery. We included patients who underwent cardiac surgery to examine FTR, defined as mortality in those who experienced a Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined major complication. Era 2 (7/2021-6/2023) and Era 1 (7/2016-6/2021) were characterized by presence and absence of nighttime intensivists staffing, respectively. Complications and FTR rates, daily ICU census, and relative value units (RVUs) were compared. Among 5,654 patients, 17% (284/1,661) in Era 2 had at least one complication versus 19% (769/3,993) in Era 1 (P=0.057). Among patients with complications, FTR incidence was 8% (22/284) in Era 2 versus 19% (145/769) in Era 1 (P<0.001). Daily average ICU census did not change (12.3 in Era 2 vs. 12.0 in Era 1, P=0.386). Comparing mean annual RVUs during the two fiscal years in Era 2 (35,613/year) to what would have been expected based on the last two fiscal years of Era 1 (26,744/year), a significant increase of +8,870/year was observed (95% CI=3,876-13,863, P=0.028). Multivariable analyses found no difference in the risk of major complications comparing Era 2 versus Era 1 (OR=1.04, 95% CI=0.89-1.23, P=0.602), and a 59% reduction in FTR risk in Era 2 versus Era 1 (OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.25-0.67, P<0.001). Nighttime ICU coverage reduced FTR rates in post-cardiotomy patients while complication rates and ICU census remained stable. Furthermore, the increase in RVUs suggested an economically sustainable model.

PGY-2 emergency medicine residents are more efficient when paired with an early clinical medical student.

There is a concern that provide increased extraneous cognitive load when paired with residents on shift. However, this may be offset by the decrease in extraneous load they may provide to the residents they are paired with by offloading basic patient care tasks. We hypothesized that these forces may not be balanced. We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of PGY-2 emergency medicine residents and junior medical students at a single academic emergency department (ED) in the Midwest. A series of efficiency metrics (relative value unit [RVUs], patients per hour [PPH], time to note completion, and resident assignment to disposition [RATD]) as well as one quality metric (number of return ED visits; "bouncebacks") were compared for resident shifts in which a student was paired with the resident as well those in which no student was paired utilizing a regression model. A total of 1844 records met the inclusion criteria (214 shifts with a paired medical student and 1630 without). After covariates were adjusted for, medical student shift status was a statistically significant predictor of increases in PPH (p < 0.0001) and RVUs (p = 0.0161) but was not significantly associated with RATD (p = 0.6941), log-time to note completion (p = 0.1604), or bounceback status (p = 0.9840). Shifts where residents were paired with medical students were predicted to see an additional 1.131 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660-1.602) PPH and produce an additional 1.923 RVUs (95% CI 1.130-3.273) per shift relative to shifts without medical students. When junior medical students were paired with a PGY-2 resident on ED shifts, there was a significant increase in the PPH and RVUs generated when compared with shifts in which no medical student was paired with them.

Emergency physicians spend more time caring for patients who prefer a language other than English which may not be accounted for in reimbursement structures.

Emergency departments increasingly serve patients who prefer a language other than English. Honoring patients' language preferences is crucial for quality and cultural appropriateness of care. We sought to assess whether time spent in caring for patients who preferred a language other than English differed from patients whose language preference was English. Secondarily, we sought to assess professional reimbursement across the two groups. We retrospectively analyzed an existing dataset from a time-in-motion study that included direct observation measurements of emergency physicians' time spent during patient encounters. Our primary outcome was physician time spent conducting patient care, comparing patients who preferred a language other than English to patients who preferred English. Secondarily, we sought to assess if relative value unit (RVU)-based compensation differed across the two groups. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed multivariable regression. Across 218 patient encounters, physicians spent 18.6% longer on encounters with patients whose preferred a language other than English (median=18.5 min, interquartile range [IQR] 14.8-27.9 min) than for those who preferred English (median=15.6 min, IQR 11.5-22.9 min; p=0.04). After controlling for other factors, patients' preferred language was not associated with increased RVUs (β=-0.12, t=-1.94, p=0.055). Emergency physicians appear to spend more time caring for patients who prefer a language other than English. This additional effort during the care of this potentially vulnerable population may not be reflected in past and current reimbursement structures. Additional research is prudent as we seek to better address social determinants of health in care delivery and reimbursement systems.

Evolving Trainee Participation in Radiologists’ Workload: A National Medicare-Focused Analysis From 2008 to 2020

PurposeIncreasing volumes and productivity expectations, along with practice type consolidation, may be impacting trainees’ roles in the work effort of radiologists involved in education. We assessed temporal shifts in trainee participation in radiologists’ workload nationally. MethodsAll US radiologists interpreting noninvasive diagnostic imaging for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were identified from annual 5% Research Identifiable Files from 2008 to 2020 (n = 35,595). Teaching radiologists were defined as those billing services using Medicare’s GC modifier, indicating trainee supervision. Billed work relative value units were used to determine the percentage of teaching radiologists’ total workload with trainee participation. Mean trainee participation in workload was calculated for teaching radiologists overall and stratified by radiologist and practice characteristics determined using National Downloadable Files. ResultsThe percentage of radiologists involved in teaching increased from 13.6% (2008) to 20.4% (2020). Among teaching radiologists, mean total workload increased 7% from 2008 to 2019 and decreased in 2020 to 2% below 2008’s level; mean teaching workload decreased 19% from 2008 to 2019 and decreased in 2020 to 31% below 2008’s level. Mean trainee participation in teaching radiologists’ total workload decreased from 35.3% (2008) to 26.3% (2019) and 24.5% (2020). Teaching radiologists showed decreased mean trainee participation when stratified by gender, experience, subspecialty, geography, practice type, and practice size. ConclusionsThe percentage of US radiologists involved in resident teaching has increased, likely reflecting academic practice expansion and academic-community practice consolidation. However, a declining percentage of teaching radiologists’ total workload involves trainees; this dispersion effect could have implications for education quality.

For the Love of the Game: Calculating the Premium Associated With Academic Surgical Practice.

We sought to determine the premium associated with a career in academic surgery, as measured by compensation normalized to the work relative value unit (wRVU). An academic surgical career embodying innovation and mentorship offers intrinsic rewards but is not well monetized. We know compensation for academic surgeons is less than their nonacademic counterparts, but the value of clinical effort, as normalized to the wRVU, between academic and nonacademic surgeons has not been well characterized. Thus, we analyzed the variations in the valuation of academic and nonacademic surgical work from 2010 to 2022. We utilized Medical Group Management Association Provider Compensation data from 2010, 2014, 2018, and 2022 to compare academic and nonacademic surgeons. We analyzed raw total cash compensation (TCC), wRVU, TCC per wRVU (TCC/wRVU), and TCC to collections (TCCtColl). We calculated collections per wRVU (Coll/wRVU). We adjusted TCC and TCCtColl for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. Linear modeling for trend analysis was performed. Compared with nonacademic, academic surgeons had lower TCC (2010: $500,415.0±23,666 vs $631,515.5±23,948.2, -21%; 2022: $564,789.8±23,993.9 vs $628,247.4±15,753.2, -10%), despite higher wRVUs (2022: 9109.4±474.9 vs 8062.7±252.7) and higher Coll/wRVU (2022: 76.68±8.15 vs 71.80±6.10). Trend analysis indicated that TCC will converge in 2038 at an estimated $660,931. In 2022, academic surgeons had more clinical activity and superior organizational revenue capture, despite less total and normalized clinical compensation. On the basis of TCC/wRVUs, academia charges a premium of 16% over nonacademic surgery. However, trend analysis suggests that TCC will converge within the next 20 years.

Early-career and fellow gynecologic oncologists perceive underpreparedness for the business of medicine: A Society of gynecologic oncology survey study

ObjectiveThere is a research gap on the impact of payment, reimbursement, and academic productivity in career decision-making for early-career (EC) attendings in gynecologic oncology. We sought to assess gynecologic oncology fellows and EC attendings on their knowledge and perceptions regarding the business of medicine. MethodsAn anonymous survey was electronically disseminated to fellow and EC SGO members. Key themes were the business of medicine, productivity, and compensation/negotiation. A 5-point Likert scale was utilized; descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS. ResultsThere was a 29 % response rate: 82 fellows and 102 EC attendings. Most were white (n = 143, 78 %) and female (n = 138, 75 %.) Most fellows (n = 67, 82 %) were interested in, and most EC (n = 82, 82 %) were employed in, academic/non-private practice. Fellows and EC attendings reported insufficient education on RVUs (relative value units) and reimbursement (80 %, n = 66; 81 %, n = 83) and did not feel prepared for the business aspect of practice (80 %, n = 66; 73 %, n = 75). Over 40 % of fellows did not understand how RVUs relate to practice. Thirty-three percent of EC attendings did not understand RVU assignments; 29 % were satisfied with methods used to determine productivity, and 17 % did not understand their compensation. Over 60 % of fellows felt unprepared to negotiate clinical productivity expectations. For EC attendings, 47 % were uncomfortable negotiating clinical expectations, 32 % negotiating academic expectations, and 52 % negotiating compensation changes. Female EC felt less prepared than male EC regarding the business of medicine (p = 0.02), RVU assignments (p < 0.01), and compensation negotiations (p < 0.01). ConclusionMost gynecologic oncology fellows and early-career attendings do not feel prepared for the business of medicine. Women were less comfortable with these concepts than men. Formal education should be incorporated into career development curricula.

Distribution and Disparities of Industry Payments to Neuroradiologists.

Physician-industry relationships can be useful for driving innovation and technologic progress, though little is known about the scale or impact of industry involvement in neuroradiology. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends and distributions of industry payments to neuroradiologists. Neuroradiologists were identified using a previously-validated method based on Work Relative Value Units and Neiman Imaging Types of Service classification. Data on payments from industry were obtained from the Open Payments database from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, from 2016 to 2021. Payments were grouped into 7 categories, including consulting fees, education, gifts, medical supplies, research, royalties/ownership, and speaker fees. Descriptive statistics were calculated. A total of 3019 neuroradiologists were identified in this study. Between 2016 and 2021, 48% (1440/3019) received at least 1 payment from industry, amounting to a total number of 21,967 payments. Each year, among those receiving payments from industry, each unique neuroradiologist received between a mean of 5.49-7.42 payments and a median of 2 payments, indicating a strong rightward skew to the distribution of payments. Gifts were the most frequent payment type made (60%, 13,285/21,967) but accounted for only 4.1% ($689,859/$17,010,546) of payment value. The greatest aggregate payment value came from speaker fees, which made up 36% ($6,127,484/$17,010,546) of the total payment value. The top 5% highest paid neuroradiologists received 42% (9133/21,967) of payments, which accounted for 84% ($14,284,120/$17,010,546) of the total dollar value. Since the start of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the number of neuroradiologists receiving industry payments decreased from a mean of 671 neuroradiologists per year prepandemic (2016-2019) to 411 in the postpandemic (2020-2021) era (P = .030). The total number of payments to neuroradiologists decreased from 4177 per year prepandemic versus 2631 per year postpandemic (P = .011). Industry payments to neuroradiologists are highly concentrated among top earners, particularly among the top 5% of payment recipients. The number of payments decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, though the dollar value of payments was offset by coincidental increases in royalty payments. Further investigation is needed in subsequent years to determine if the postpandemic changes in industry payment trends continue.

Defining our worth.

A recent article by Rodino et al. published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology (K. G. Rodino, P. M. Luethy, A. N. Abbott, J. M. Bender, A. R. Eberly, M. Gitman, A. Leber, and J. Dien Bard, J Clin Microbiol 62:e00359-24, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00359-24) hones in on clinical consultation as a way for clinical microbiology laboratory directors (CMLDs) to provide evidence of our worth. They relate that, unlike our physician colleagues, we are unable to generate billing for clinical consultations, relative value units, or other metrics that could assist to describe our import. Their study evaluated consultations performed by CMLDs as a way to underscore our importance as a key member of the healthcare team.

Advanced Practice Providers in Pediatric Surgery: A 10-Year Analysis of Clinical Productivity

Introduction: Advanced practice providers (APPs) are integral to nonsurgical and surgical fields. In surgical settings, APPs work autonomously alongside surgeons to enhance continuity of care. While small-scale studies across various surgical specialties have explored APP utilization, literature specific to the pediatric population is limited. This study assesses the impact of increased APP utilization on productivity within one of the largest pediatric surgery departments in the United States. Methods: Data was sourced from the Surgery Department Executive Committee (SDEC) annual reports. Descriptive analyses were performed to delineate trends in clinical volumes, OR cases, gross charges, work relative value units (wRVUs), and provider full-time equivalents (FTEs) between October 2011 and September 2023. Secondary analyses were performed from 2016 to 2023, after APP roles were refined in each division. Results: Since 2012, an upward trend is observed in total clinic visits, total OR cases, and OR cases per MD. In 2016, APPs saw 1 clinic patient for every 2.2 seen by MDs, decreasing to a 1:1 ratio by 2023. The MD surgical conversion rate has increased by 20.5% since 2016, while the conversion rate per total clinic volume has decreased by 7.3% over the same period. Total wRVUs and gross charges increased across the department and per provider, despite fewer overall providers since 2021. Conclusion: Increased utilization of APPs within the department of surgery may enhance procedural productivity for surgeons while ensuring continued patient access to care. This study highlights the importance of developing care models that optimize the full skillset of APPs.

The comprehensive value of the modern vascular surgeon to the orthopedic surgery service

ObjectiveOrthopedic surgery is among the highest compensated specialties in modern practice. Vascular surgeons are consulted frequently during orthopedic operations, however, the comprehensive value of the vascular surgery service to the safe delivery of orthopedic care has not been characterized previously. MethodsElectronic medical records were retrospectively queried for all operations performed by orthopedic surgeons requiring operative vascular surgical consultation from June 2013 to December 2023. Data were collected on case-specific details, reasons for consultation, and total charges. Work relative value units were calculated for each primary orthopedic procedure using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician fee schedule. ResultsA total of 952 operative vascular surgery consultations were required over the study period. Consults were requested by 56 orthopedic surgeons across all eight orthopedic subspecialties at our institution. Operative vascular consultation was requested across 108 different procedure types. A total of 94 consults (9.9%) were emergent, intraoperative requests, with the remaining 858 consults (90.1%) occurring in the preoperative setting. The most common causes for consultation included surgical exposure (n = 832 [87.4%]), inadvertent bleeding (n = 44 [4.6%]), need for bypass (n = 12 [1.3%]), and acute limb ischemia (n = 11 [1.2%]). Total charges for all operative consultations exceeded $91.5 million, and the calculated total work relative value units for all primary orthopedic procedures was 19,384.5. A total of 54 cases (5.7%) occurred after hours, on a weekend, or both. ConclusionsVascular surgeons are integral to the provision of orthopedic surgical services, inclusive of all orthopedic subspecialties, for both the prevention and treatment of iatrogenic vascular injury. The around-the-clock availability of a vascular surgeon enables the orthopedic surgery department to generate significant revenue for the hospital system. These findings are important to the ongoing discussions regarding the value and compensation of the modern vascular surgeon.

Relative Value Unit (RVU) and Medicare Severity Diagnosis-related Group (MS-DRG) Reimbursement in Cervical Spinal Fusion: A 2011-2023 Trends Report.

Level 3 retrospective database study. This study aims to compare work RVU (wRVU), practice expense RVU (peRVU), malpractice RVU (mpRVU), and inflation-adjusted facility price alongside MS-DRG relative weight length of stay (LOS) for cervical spine fusions between 2011 and 2023. Both RVU and MS-DRG reimbursement have been studied in various surgical subspecialties; however, little investigation has centered on cervical spine fusions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate trends in RVU and MS-DRG reimbursement in cervical spine fusion throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) physician fee schedule was queried between 2011 and 2023 for RVU and facility reimbursement using common single and multilevel anterior and posterior cervical fusion codes. RVU facility prices were inflation adjusted to 2023. MS-DRG reimbursement data from 2011 to 2022 were compiled for cervical spinal fusion procedures with major complication or comorbidity (MCC) 471, complication or comorbidity (CC) 472, and without CC/MCC 473. Compound annual growth rates (CAGRs), Mean Annual Change, and yearly percent changes were calculated. No changes in wRVU were seen for all cervical CPT codes; however, the CAGR of peRVU (-0.51%±0.60%) and mpRVU (0.69%±0.41%) demonstrated marginal fluctuations. Every CPT code displayed an inflation-adjusted facility price decrease (-2.18%±0.24%). When assessing MS-DRG, there were marginal changes in geometric mean LOS (0.17%±0.45%), arithmetic mean LOS (-0.15%±0.84%), and relative weight (1.09%±0.68%). Unlike RVU reimbursement, the yearly percent change differs between each MS-DRG code. Inflation-adjusted RVU reimbursement facility prices demonstrated a consistent decrease, while DRG code reimbursement stayed relatively consistent over the study period. This data may help surgeons and hospitals become cognizant of temporal variations in reimbursement patterns as it may affect their personal practice. Level III retrospective study.

Dwindling dollars: The inflation-adjusted decline of Medicare reimbursement in endocrine surgery (2003–2023)

Medicare determines reimbursement rates for medical services, often setting a benchmark that is followed by private insurers. Across various medical specialties, decreases in Medicare reimbursement have been observed. However, the extent of Medicare reimbursement for endocrine surgery remains unexplored. This study investigates the trajectory of reimbursement rates for endocrine surgical procedures. Data spanning 2003 to 2023 were gathered from the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool for 16 endocrine operations and procedures. Each operation's or procedure's relative value units and conversion factor, which accounts for geographic variation in relative value units, are determined annually by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The total annual Medicare reimbursement for each operation or procedure was determined by multiplying procedure-specific relative value units with the conversion factor. Raw yearly percentage changes in reimbursement were computed and compared to changes in the general consumer price index. All data were then corrected for inflation. The compound annual growth rate for each procedure was calculated using inflation-adjusted data. From 2003 to 2023, the mean unadjusted percentage change for all queried procedures was+14.14% (standard deviation 0.28). During this same time, the consumer price index increased by 69.15% (P < .001). After adjusting for inflation, the mean total adjusted percentage change for all queried procedures over the entire study period was -31% (standard deviation 0.17). The adjusted average yearly compound annual growth rate was -1.93% (standard deviation 0.92). Only 1 procedure showed an increase in reimbursement (image-guided fine-needle aspiration,+32%). Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement rates for endocrine surgical procedures have consistently declined. Stakeholders must address these trends to ensure access to quality surgical endocrine care in an evolving health care landscape.

Medicaid Reimbursement for Common Orthopedic Trauma Procedures is 16.0% Less Compared to Medicare with Substantial Variability Between States.

This study seeks to evaluate the variability of Medicaid reimbursement and compare it to Medicare reimbursement using the 20 most commonly billed orthopedic trauma CPT codes nationwide. The authors anticipate significant variability between states and hypothesize that Medicaid payment will be significantly less than Medicare payment. The top 20 most common orthopedic trauma surgery procedural codes were identified from a previous analysis performed by Haglin et al.1 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services physician fee schedule was used to determine reimbursement rates from Medicare, and state Medicaid fee schedules were used to determine reimbursement rates for Medicaid. State Medicaid rates were compared to their corresponding Medicare rates to determine a dollar difference. Additionally, the dollar difference for each CPT code was divided by its respective physician relative value unit (RVU). This was utilized to acknowledge the possible variability in the complexity of orthopedic procedures and the related physician effort. The Medicare Wage Index was used to adjust Medicaid rates based on the cost of living for the state as well. Coefficients of variation were calculated to represent overall variability in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rates. The mean reimbursement rates for Medicaid were lower for all 20 procedures compared to Medicare. On average, Medicaid reimbursed 16.0% less than Medicare, and 29.6% less when adjusting for cost-of-living. MCD reimbursed at a higher rate than MCR for all procedures in only nine states (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, and North Dakota, and South Dakota) while 38 states reimbursed at a lower rate than MCR, on average. The coefficient of variation ranged from 0.24 to 0.34 for the Medicaid unadjusted group and from 0.35 to 0.46 for the Medicare Wage-Index adjusted group. In contrast, the Medicare group was consistent at 0.06 for all 20 procedures. The average dollar difference across the 20 CPT codes for Medicaid reimbursement compared to Medicare ranged from -$76.89 to -$225.17, and the dollar difference per relative value unit ranged from -$5.96 to -$15.16. This study found a high amount of variation between state Medicaid reimbursement rates and average rates that were significantly lower than Medicare reimbursement rates for the top twenty most utilized orthopedic trauma CPT codes as identified by Haglin et al. The discrepancy in reimbursement was increased when Medicaid rates were adjusted for state cost-of-living. Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Medicaid Reimbursement for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A State-by-State Analysis Compared With Medicare

BackgroundMedicare (MCR) reimbursement for arthroplasty procedures has been declining, but little has been reported on Medicaid (MCD) reimbursement. We sought to determine MCD reimbursement rates using state MCD data for nine arthroplasty procedure codes and compare them to MCR rates. MethodsThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services physician fee schedule was used to collect MCR reimbursement rates, and state MCD fee schedules were accessed to collect MCD rates for nine procedures encompassing primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. State MCR and MCD rates were compared to determine the mean dollar difference and dollar difference per relative value unit. A cost of living adjustment was performed using the Medicare Wage Index for each state. Coefficients of variation were calculated for each state to determine overall variability between the two systems. ResultsThe mean reimbursement rates for MCD were lower for eight of the nine codes used in the study. Medicaid reimbursed physicians an average of 11.3% less overall and 23.1% less when adjusted for cost of living. The amount of variability in the MCR rates was low with a consistent coefficient of variation of 0.06, but was higher in the MCD rates with a range of 0.26 to 0.29 in the unadjusted rates and 0.34 to 0.37 in the adjusted rates. There was a mean $6.73 decreased reimbursement per relative value unit for MCD procedures. ConclusionsFor the most common arthroplasty procedures, MCD reimbursed physicians less than MCR on average. MCD also demonstrated increased variability when compared to MCR rates between states.

Perioperative Outcomes and Reimbursement Patterns Associated With the Anterior versus Posterior Approach for Treatment of Type 2 Odontoid Fractures, a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis

To evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes and the reimbursement patterns, after treatment of type 2 odontoid fractures using the anterior or posterior approach. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for surgically treated patients with type 2 odontoid fractures by the anterior or posterior approach between 2016 and 2020. Propensity score matching with the optimal approach was used to balance the cohorts. A total of 96 patients in the anterior and 352 patients in the posterior surgery group were included in the unmatched analysis. After propensity score matching 1:1, 96 anterior and 96 posterior cases were included in the matched analysis. Operative times were shorter in the anterior group (92.0 vs. 145.0minutes, P < 0.001). The need for intraoperative or postoperative transfusions was higher in the posterior group (15% vs. 2.1%; P= 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in complications between groups (P > 0.05). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the posterior group (4.5days vs. 3.0; P= 0.049). Nonroutine discharge was more frequent in the posterior group (55% vs. 40%, P= 0.030). However, the rate of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). Also, the work relative value units were significantly higher in the anterior group (22.7 vs. 20.6, P < 0.001), indicating higher reimbursement trends for this approach. In this matched analysis, the anterior approach for type 2 odontoid fractures was superior to the posterior approach. The anterior approach was associated with significantly shorter operation times, hospital stays, fewer transfusions, nonroutine discharges, and higher reimbursements.