BackgroundNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing inflammatory disease that primarily affects the optic nerves and the spinal cord. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing treatments for NMOSD have been performed only in the past decade, and to date, there are three drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for anti-aquaporin-4 IgG seropositive NMOSD. This review assesses the characteristics and challenges of RCTs when evaluating treatments for NMOSD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review using the search term [“neuromyelitis optica” OR “NMO” OR “NMOSD”] AND “clinical trial” in any language on December 28, 2020.ResultsSeven RCTs were included (see reference list below), and the trials’ architectures were analyzed and synthesized. Overall, 794 patients were randomized (monoclonal antibody intervention group, n=493 [62.1%]; placebo, n=196 [24.7%]; active control, n=105 [13.2%]); 709 (89.3%) were women; and 658 (82.9%) were anti-aquaporin IgG seropositive. The primary outcome was time to relapse in 6/7 of the trials, and annualized relapse rate in the remaining one. Four RCTs used placebo in their design. Among the seven published RCTs, the trial designs differed by the criteria used to define NMOSD relapse, selection of patients, proportion of anti-aquaporin-4 IgG seronegative patients, and baseline characteristics indicating NMOSD disease severity.ConclusionEthical considerations for the use of placebo should change in light of the approval of three therapies for seropositive NMOSD. Remaining challenges for clinical trials in NMOSD include the assessment of long-term safety and efficacy, standardization of trial design and endpoints, and head-to-head study designs. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing inflammatory disease that primarily affects the optic nerves and the spinal cord. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing treatments for NMOSD have been performed only in the past decade, and to date, there are three drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for anti-aquaporin-4 IgG seropositive NMOSD. This review assesses the characteristics and challenges of RCTs when evaluating treatments for NMOSD. We conducted a systematic review using the search term [“neuromyelitis optica” OR “NMO” OR “NMOSD”] AND “clinical trial” in any language on December 28, 2020. Seven RCTs were included (see reference list below), and the trials’ architectures were analyzed and synthesized. Overall, 794 patients were randomized (monoclonal antibody intervention group, n=493 [62.1%]; placebo, n=196 [24.7%]; active control, n=105 [13.2%]); 709 (89.3%) were women; and 658 (82.9%) were anti-aquaporin IgG seropositive. The primary outcome was time to relapse in 6/7 of the trials, and annualized relapse rate in the remaining one. Four RCTs used placebo in their design. Among the seven published RCTs, the trial designs differed by the criteria used to define NMOSD relapse, selection of patients, proportion of anti-aquaporin-4 IgG seronegative patients, and baseline characteristics indicating NMOSD disease severity. Ethical considerations for the use of placebo should change in light of the approval of three therapies for seropositive NMOSD. Remaining challenges for clinical trials in NMOSD include the assessment of long-term safety and efficacy, standardization of trial design and endpoints, and head-to-head study designs.