Reinsertion Of Distal Biceps Tendon Research Articles

A new intramedullary fixation method for distal biceps tendon ruptures: a biomechanical study

Various techniques have been described for distal biceps tendon reinsertion. Although high success rates have been reported, all current techniques have specific shortcomings, with complications such as heterotopic ossification, nerve damage, and gap formation. The purpose of the present study was to biomechanically evaluate a new intramedullary fixation device that might reduce the risk of posterior interosseous nerve lesions. We therefore compared the fixation strength of this new intramedullary button with an extramedullary placed classic extracortical button. A standard bicortical button was compared to the new intramedullary fixation device using fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. The fixation strengths were tested both cyclically and statically. Load to failure and method of failure were also recorded. There were no failures during the cyclic load testing. The mean tendon-bone displacement was 0.87 ± 0.13 mm for the bicortical group and 0.83 ± 0.13 mm for the new button. During static loading, the mean load to failure for the bicortical group was 296 ± 97 N, whereas the new button group showed a higher mean load to failure of 356 ± 37 N. Breakout through the anterior cortex was recorded in 2 of 6 bicortically placed buttons and 1 of 6 in the new device. The new intramedullary fixation device yields comparable loads to failure compared with currently used techniques in a biomechanical setup. These findings together with the theoretical advantages suggest that this technique may be a valuable solution for the repair of distal biceps tendon rupture.

Surgical Management of Distal Biceps Tendon Anatomical Reinsertion Complications: Iatrogenic Posterior Interosseous Nerve Palsy.

BackgroundAlthough iatrogenic posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) palsy is an uncommon complication of ruptured distal biceps brachii tendon surgical anatomical reinsertion, it is the most severe complication leading to functional limitation. The present study investigated possible types of PIN palsy as a postoperative complication of anatomical distal biceps tendon reinsertion, and aimed to clinically assess patients at 2 years after its surgical treatment.Material/MethodsThe studied sample comprised 7 male patients diagnosed with an iatrogenic PIN palsies after anatomical reinsertion of the distal biceps tendon, who were referred to the reference center for management of a peripheral nervous system injury. The nerve injury was intraoperatively evaluated. The clinical assessment used the Medical Research Council (MRC) System for motor recovery, and the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) was performed before the surgical treatment of the PIN injuries and at 2 years postoperatively. In all studied cases, electromyography was performed preoperatively and postoperatively.ResultsThe comparison of the preoperative (x=1.43±0.53) and postoperative (x=4.71±0.49) results of the motor recovery of the PIN demonstrated a statistically significant improvement (p<0.001). Moreover, the results of functional assessments with the use of the Quick DASH questionnaire significantly improved (p<0.001) postoperatively (x=6.14±6.86) compared to the preoperative evaluations (x=54.29±12.05).ConclusionsThe PIN palsies as complications of the surgical anatomical reinsertion of ruptured distal biceps brachii resulted from mechanical nerve compression or direct intraoperative damage. The 2-year outcomes justified the clinical use of surgical management for iatrogenic PIN palsy.

Considerations of Distal Biceps Tendon Reinsertion: Commentary on an article by Christopher C. Schmidt, MD, et al.: "Factors That Determine Supination Strength Following Distal Biceps Repair".

In consideration of the relatively benign natural history of distal biceps tendon avulsions, indications for operative treatment require a balanced appraisal. To meet our value proposition, the aim of surgical reinsertion must be the restoration of nearly full function. In simple words, the result of surgical treatment must be clearly better than the result of conservative treatment. Historically, surgeons have focused on the restoration of biceps tendon continuity with the primary aim of regaining elbow flexion force. This led to the development of techniques using transosseous suture passages introduced from an anterior approach and tied posteriorly over the cortex of the radius using a second posterior approach. It was soon realized that the relative contribution of the biceps muscle to elbow flexion force was small (on the order of 10% to 15%) and that weak and sometimes incomplete active forearm supination persisted. Thus, restoration of supination force and motion was recognized as the main potential benefit of surgical reinsertion of a torn distal biceps tendon. The evolution of the technique was then complicated by the advent of suture anchors. It was now possible to directly reattach a torn tendon to the radius, without the need for transosseous suture passage. Suddenly, reattachment was …

Bicipital tuberosity bone characteristics in surgical reattachment of the distal biceps: anatomical and radiological study.

The aim of this study was to measure the cortical thickness and bone density of the different parts of the bicipital tuberosity, to evaluate the importance of these variables on resistance to pulling out of distal biceps tendon reinsertion implants. Sixteen cadaveric arms were used for this study. A multiple detector computed tomography was performed in each proximal radius. Bone thickness and density of anterior, posterior cortex and anterior trabecular bone were measured in proximal, medial and distal parts of the bicipital tuberosity. Statistical and concordance analyses of results were performed. In our specimens, the medial and distal parts of the anterior cortex and the anterior trabecular bone were thicker, mean 11.3mm SD 2.72 and 11.17mm SD 3.05, with a significant difference when compared to the proximal part; mean 10.3mm SD 2.35, of radial tuberosity. The three posterior segments where all thicker compared to the anterior cortex (proximal 3.15 SD 1.31; medial 3.33 SD 1.5; distal 3.34 SD 1.43mm), but without statistical differences between them. The measured bone density was equivalent in the three portions of the anterior cortex and trabecular bone [proximal 1924.63 SD 547.22; medial 1848.19 SD 538.59; distal 2100.47 SD 396.32 Hounsfield units (HU)]. The posterior cortex was denser compared to the anterior cortex and the anterior trabecular bone in all the segments (proximal 1962.63 SD 223.57; medial 1907.16 SD 232.08; distal 1987.06 SD 189.12 HU), but without statistical differences between the three parts. Based on the results of this anatomic study which have demonstrated that anterior cortex and anterior trabecular bone of the medial and distal regions of the bicipital tuberosity are thicker than proximal part, we postulate that these segments could give better pulling out resistance to monocortical implants. Our findings suggest that the strongest parts of the bicipital tuberosity are the proximal and medial parts of the posterior cortex. We can afford them drilling across the radius using a bicortical implant in the proximal and medial section of the radial tuberosity. Furthermore, we suggest that an increased margin of safety could be achieved to prevent injury to the posterior interosseous nerve, drilling the cortical hole in the proximal part of the radial tuberosity without losing resistance properties.

Surgical Treatment of Posttraumatic Radioulnar Synostosis.

Radioulnar synostosis is a rare complication of forearm fractures. The formation of a bony bridge induces functional disability due to limitation of the pronosupination. Although the etiology of posttraumatic synostosis is unknown, it seems that the incidence is higher in patients who have suffered a concomitant neurological or burn trauma, and extensive soft tissue injury, mainly due to high-energy impact. Surgical treatment, such as reinsertion of distal biceps tendon into the radius, seems to be another possible factor. The aim of the surgical treatment is to remove the bony bridge and restore complete range of movement (ROM), thus preventing recurrence. Literature does not indicate a preferred type of surgical procedure for the aforementioned complication; however, it has been shown that surgical interposition of inert material reduces the formation rate of recurrent bony bridge. We describe a surgical technique in two cases in which the radius and ulna were wrapped with allogenic, cadaver fascia lata graft to prevent bony bridge formation. The data from 2 years of follow-up are reported, indicating full restoration of ROM and no recurrence of synostosis.