Physical Rehabilitation Medicine Research Articles

An investigation of allied health and medical clinicians’ viewpoint on prosthetic rehabilitation and cognition

Purpose To explore the factors that influence clinicians (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, vascular surgeons, and rehabilitation medicine physicians) when prescribing prosthetic rehabilitation. Additionally, the study aimed to gain insight into clinicians’ perspectives regarding the role of patient cognition in prosthetic rehabilitation. Materials and methods This research constitutes one segment of a broader action research study which was undertaken in 2022. A total of thirty-four key clinicians involved in the amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation pathway within a local health district in Australia were engaged through a combination of group and individual interviews as well as surveys. Results Five essential considerations when prescribing prosthetic rehabilitation emerged. These included patient’s goals, medical history, quality of life, cognitive abilities, and the support available on discharge. This study also revealed variations in opinions among different disciplines concerning appropriateness of prosthetic rehabilitation for the patient cohort. Despite this, there was a desire to build a consensus around a shared approach of identification for patients and clinicians. Conclusion The identification of these key pillars for clinician consideration has simplified a complex area of care. These pillars could be used to guide pertinent conversations regarding prosthetic rehabilitation and are closely linked with the patient’s cognition.

A Forgotten Pupil of Sir Ludwig Guttmann: Ralph Spira, M.D.(Paris) , LRCP &Surg (Edin.), and LRCPS (Glas). (1913 Krakow, Poland-1997, Tel Aviv, Israel)

Dr. Ralph Spira (1913 Krakow, Poland-1997, TelAviv, Israel ) studied medicine in Paris and, in 1938,moved to London to work in emergency medicineand surgery. During the War, he volunteered to servewith the British Royal Navy and in a few generalhospitals. Later on, he was affiliated with the rehabilitation medicine units, and in 1948, he wassent to join Dr. Ludwig Guttmann's at the firstNational Spinal Unit, Stoke Mandeville Hospital,Aylesbury, Bucks. In 1952, he immigrated to Israeland is regarded as one of the first rehabilitationmedicine physicians in the newly established state.

Evidence-based position paper on physical and rehabilitation medicine professional practice for persons with COVID-19, including post COVID-19 condition: the European PRM position (UEMS PRM Section).

Although multiple factors still pose challenges to inpatient/outpatient rehabilitation for survivors of COVID-19, rehabilitation plays a key role for this patient population. This study aimed to improve Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) physician's professional practice for persons with COVID-19-related functioning limitations, to promote functional recovery and reduce activity limitations and/or participation restrictions. A systematic review of the scientific literature was performed from December 2019 to August 2022, followed by production of recommendations through 5 Delphi rounds, by consensus among the delegates of all European countries represented in the Union of European Medical Specialists PRM Section. The systematic literature review is reported together with thirty-two recommendations resulting from the Delphi procedure. The PRM physician's role for persons with COVID-19-related limitations of functioning is to develop, foster, and monitor the implementation of an individual rehabilitation project tailored to the patient's age, previous medical and functional status, current comorbidities and complications, activity limitations and participation restrictions and personal and environmental factors. This is done by applying the concept of a multi-specialty integrated service model with multi-professional/interdisciplinary teams, providing care at all stages of COVID-19 illness. This evidence-based position paper represents the official position of the European Union through the UEMS PRM Section.

Exploring Orthopedic Occupational Therapy in Korea: Insights from a Survey on Occupational Therapists' Perspectives.

This study explores the perceptions and experiences of Korean occupational therapists (OTs) about their role in managing elderly patients with orthopedic conditions. The goal is to inform policy discussions for better integration of OT services in orthopedic care settings in Korea. A survey was conducted among Korean clinical OTs to gather data on their perceptions, experiences, and challenges in providing orthopedic OT services. Snowball sampling was used, and the survey addressed general characteristics, orthopedic OT status, perceptions, and competence. The data were analyzed using frequency and percentage calculations in SPSS 22.0. Out of 171 respondents, only 18 had experience working in orthopedic departments, while 78 (45.6%) had provided occupational therapy to orthopedic patients. Rehabilitation medicine physicians were the primary prescribers of orthopedic OT. Key challenges included a lack of awareness among professionals, an absence of appropriate fees, and insufficient knowledge among OTs. The majority of respondents agreed that providing OT in orthopedic departments was appropriate and expressed a need for education and clinical guidelines. The study examines the current state of orthopedic OT in Korea, showing low levels of experience and highlighting challenges, such as a lack of professional awareness, inadequate fees, and insufficient knowledge among OTs. Respondents mostly agreed on the necessity for education and clinical guidelines to improve their capabilities in orthopedic settings. This study emphasizes the need for healthcare system improvements that allow OTs to participate more widely without being confined to specific medical disciplines, promoting a more comprehensive approach to OT, especially as the aging population continues to grow.

End-of-life decisions and involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Physicians in Europe

Objective: As Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians are experts in functional prognoses of disabling health conditions, the aim of this study was to gain insight into their involvement in end-of-life decisions in patients with neurological or terminal diseases in European countries.Design: Exploratory cross-sectional survey.Subjects: Delegates of the Union of European Medical Specialists, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section.Methods: In July 2020, a self-constructed survey was sent to 82 delegates from 38 European countries, who were asked to answer from the point of view of their country. Topics included the legal status of end-of-life decisions and the involvement of Physical andRehabilitation Medicine physicians in these decisions.Results: Between July 2020 and December 2020, 32 delegates from 28 countries completed the survey (response rate country level of 74%). If legal frameworks allow for these specific end-of-life decisions, involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians was reported in 2 of 3 countries in euthanasia cases, 10 of 17 countries in non-treatment decision cases, and 13 of 16 countries in cases of intensified symptom management by the administration of drugs using potentially life-shortening doses.Conclusion: Estimated involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in end-of-life decisions varied between European countries, even when legal frameworks allow for these decisions. LAY ABSTRACTEnd-of-life considerations may arise after severe disabling health conditions and lead to end-of-life decisions. As Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians are experts in functional prognosis for patients with these health conditions, their expertise could be of value to consider in these decisions. Legal frameworks and attitudes towards end-of-life decisions differ between European countries. However, there is a lack of information on the involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in these decisions. Therefore, delegates of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in European countries were surveyed on the legal status of end-of-life decisions and the involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians. The responses of delegates from 28 countries suggested differences in involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in end-of-life decisions between European countries, even between countries with a legal status of these end-of-life decisions. In the light of the ageing population and a general tendency toward more liberal attitudes concerning end-of-life decisions in Europe, these findings could be of interest in order to optimize end-of-life care in the coming years.

Relationship between care pathway features and use or non-use of orthotic devices by individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a cross-sectional, exploratory study

Purpose Orthotic devices may be prescribed for the management of foot and ankle deformities caused by Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT). However, the actual use of these devices is variable. No studies have evaluated the impact of prescription, delivery and follow-up of orthotic devices on their use. We aimed to describe the relationship between the pathways followed by individuals with CMT and orthotic device use. Materials and methods Exploratory, cross-sectional, 35-item survey of orthotic device management. Individuals with CMT were recruited from CMT-France Association. Results Of the 940 respondents, 795 were included, mean age of 52.9 (SD 16.9) years. Rate of orthotic device use was 49.2% (391/795). The most frequent reason for non-use was a poor fit. Non-use was related to the orthotic device type, the health professionals consulted, and the severity of the CMT-related impairments. Follow-up visits (38.7%), re-evaluation of orthotic devices (25.3%) and consultations with the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physician were infrequent (28.3%). Conclusions Orthotic devices are massively underused. Follow-up and re-evaluation are infrequent. Care pathways, prescription and delivery of orthotic devices must be optimized to meet the expectations of people with CMT. Device fitting, individual needs, and changes in the clinical state must be re-evaluated regularly by specialists to improve orthotic device use. Implications for rehabilitation Foot deformities and foot drop contribute to disability in people with Charcot Marie Tooth Disease but use of orthotic devices is poor. To improve orthotic device use, regular multidisciplinary consultations and regular re-evaluation of the device by specialists in neuro-orthopaedics are important. The device fit should be regularly re-evaluated by the prescribing doctor or the practitioner who made the device. Regular multimodal evaluation of foot deformity, including muscle strength and length, and the individual’s needs and expectations is also important to improve orthotic device use.

A Survey of the Perceptions, Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice of Evidence-Based Medicine among Rehabilitation Medicine Trainees and Consultants in a University-Based Tertiary Hospital

Objectives. The study aimed to determine the perceptions, attitudes, knowledge and practice of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) among Rehabilitation Medicine trainees and faculty. It aimed to compare trainees and faculty in terms of perceptions, attitudes, knowledge and practice. The study also intended to identify the barriers in the practice of EBM.
 Methods. The study utilized a cross-sectional design. The study included residents or trainees and consultants at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine-Philippine General Hospital. A questionnaire exploring the perceptions, knowledge, attitudes and practice of EBM and the barriers in its practice was developed based on review of previous studies. Focus group discussions were conducted with the residents and consultants separately to probe the responses in the questionnaire.
 Results. Thirty-four trainees and consultants participated in the study. Trainees considered themselves having received more training in literature search (p=0.005) and critical appraisal (p=0.01) than consultants. Majority had fairly accurate conceptions of EBM. Thirty-eight percent of participants considered themselves competent in developing a clinical question and in doing a literature search. About 18% considered themselves competent in appraising literature. There were no significant differences between trainees and consultants in terms of their perceived knowledge and skills in EBM techniques. Consultants and trainees expressed positive attitudes towards EBM. In a week, some 50% search the literature at least twice and appraised an article. Eighty percent of Rehabilitation Medicine physicians (physiatrists) spent at least 2 hours per week reading related literature. In terms of practice of EBM, the trainees rated themselves higher in searching and appraising literature than the consultants but the differences were not significant. More than 90% indicated interest in further training in EBM. Majority cited lack of time, lack of understanding of statistics and inadequate information sources as barriers to EBM.
 Conclusion. Physiatrists have fairly accurate perceptions; positive attitudes; some knowledge / skills; and a high level of interest in EBM. There were no significant differences between consultants and trainees except in the aspect of training in literature search and appraisal. The lack of personal time, lack of understanding of statistical analyses and inadequate information sources were the most common perceived barriers in the practice of EBM in Physiatry.

Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale in clinical practice of stroke units and rehabilitation wards.

The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the most common tool to quantify post-stroke disability in everyday practice and by certified raters in clinical trials. However, interobserver variability may affect reliability of retrospective observational studies, including clinical registries. Our aim was to assess real-life consistency between neurologists and physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians using mRS to rate post-stroke disability of patients transferred directly from stroke unit (SU) to rehabilitation ward (RW). This is a retrospective analysis of 132 consecutive acute stroke patients transferred from single tertiary SU to RW located in the same hospital in Poland. Patients were assessed by one rater from each department at the day of transfer. We distinguished between physicians previously certified in using mRS for clinical trials and not-certified physicians using mRS in everyday practice. mRS at discharge from SU and on admission to RW was recorded for 105 of 132 patients. The overall agreement was 70.5% (kappa 0.55). Similar agreement was observed in the subset of 30 patients rated by certified physicians in both departments (70.0%, kappa 0.57) and in the subset of 61 patients rated by a pair of certified neurologist and not-certified rehabilitation physician (73.8%, kappa 0.58). Everyday consistency between raters from SU and RW in using mRS is modest as in previous validation studies. However, it may be considered sufficient for the purpose of observational studies or stroke registries. It emphasizes the need for easily accessible training in conventional mRS or implementation of specialized tools with predefined questions.

Myocardial muscular bridge, issues of diagnosis, treatment and medical rehabilitation on the example of a specific clinical case

The myocardial muscular bridge is one of the underes-timated, in clinical practice, congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries, which can have a significant impact on the clinical course, prognosis and outcomes of coronary heart disease, and in some cases can cause sudden car-diac death, including at a young age. The purpose of the article, once again, to draw the attention of practitioners, cardiologists, therapists, general practitioners, doctors of physical rehabilitation medicine and doctors of oth-er specialties to this topic on a specific clinical example. The article summarizes the historical aspects of the topic, diag nostic issues, classification, treatment approaches and features of medical rehabilitation. A clinical case of a patient with a myocardial bridge of HRQ with a char-acteristic clinical picture and reliable instrumental confir-mation was also presented

"Leadership in Rehabilitation Teamwork: Challenges for Developing Countries".

Physical rehabilitation medicine is a diverse specialty; its main objective is to provide comprehensive rehabilitation involving multiple health care professionals to optimize function and improve the quality of life for people with disabilities. There is an increase in the number of people with disabilities, and people with disabilities in lower income countries do not receive the required rehabilitation. Rehabilitation intervention includes functional assessment, rehabilitation goal setting, composition of the focused team and coordination of the team works, all of which require a highly skilled team leader. No single professional is likely to have all the necessary skills to achieve optimal results alone. There is a knowledge gap between the theory, existing situation, and practice in rehabilitation team functioning. In this short communication challenges for quality rehabilitation services were highlighted, including the importance of the leadership role of team functioning.

A Delphi technique toward the development of a cognitive intervention framework module for breast cancer survivors with cognitive impairment following chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a well-known phenomenon among breast cancer survivors. Cognitive impairment among breast cancer survivors can significantly affect their quality of life and ability to function independently. However, there is a lack of specific and focused cognitive intervention to improve their cognitive performances. This study aimed to develop a tailored cognitive intervention framework module by adapting the attention and memory interventions from the Cognitive Rehabilitation Manual of the Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group (BI-SIG) of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) and incorporating them with the relevant exercises for cognitive rehabilitation for Malaysian breast cancer survivors with CRCI based on the consensus agreement of the expert panel. The Delphi consensus technique was conducted online to review and evaluate the framework module. A panel of experts, including rehabilitation medicine physicians, occupational therapists, and clinical psychologists in Malaysia, was invited to participate in this study. For each round, the expert consensus was defined as more than 90% of the expert panel agreeing or strongly agreeing with the proposed items. A total of 33 practitioners completed the three Delphi rounds. 72.7% of the expert panel have been practising in their relevant clinical fields for more than six years (M = 10.67, SD = 5.68). In Round 1, 23% of the experts suggested that the framework module for attention training required further improvements, specifically in the language (M = 1.97, SD = 0.75) and instructions (M = 2.03, SD = 0.71) provided. In Round 2, 15% of the experts recommended additional changes in the instruction (M = 2.15, SD = 0.67) for attention training. Amendments made to the framework module in line with the recommendations provided by the experts resulted in a higher level of consensus, as 94% to 100% of the experts in Round 3 concluded the framework module was suitable and comprehensive for our breast cancer survivors. Following the key results, the objectives were practical, and the proposed approaches, strategies, and techniques for attention and memory training were feasible. The clarity of the instructions, procedures, verbatim transcripts, and timeframe further enhanced the efficacy and utility of the framework module. This study found out that the cognitive intervention framework module for breast cancer survivors with cognitive impairment following chemotherapy can be successfully developed and feasible to be implemented using Delphi technique.

International Recommendations to Manage Poststroke Equinovarus Foot Deformity Validated by a Panel of Experts Using Delphi

ObjectiveTo establish international recommendations for the management of spastic equinovarus foot deformity. DesignDelphi method. SettingInternational study. ParticipantsA total of 24 international experts (N=24) in neuro-orthopedic deformities, from different specialties (Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians, neurologists, geriatricians, orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, plastic surgeons). InterventionsExperts answered 3 rounds of questions related to important aspects of diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of spastic equinovarus foot deformity. Main Outcome MeasuresA consensus was established when at least 80% of experts agreed on a statement ResultsA total of 52 items reached consensus. Experts recommend assessing effect of the deformity on functional activities before treatment. Before treatment, it is crucial to differentiate spastic muscle overactivity from soft tissue contractures, identify which muscles are involved in the deformity, and evaluate the activity of antagonist muscles. Motor nerve blocks, 2-dimensional video analysis, and radiologic examinations are often required to complement a clinical examination. The treatment of equinovarus foot depends on the correctability of the deformity and the patient's ability to stand or walk. The preoperative assessment should include an interdisciplinary consultation that must finalize a formal agreement between physicians and the patient, which will define personalized attainable goals before surgery. ConclusionThe establishment of guidelines on managing equinovarus foot will help physicians and surgeons, specialists, and nonspecialists to diagnoses and assess the deformity and direct patients to a network of experts to optimize patient functional recovery and improve their autonomy.

Building PRM in sub-Saharan Africa.

It is estimated that about 50% of people in low- and middle- income countries who require rehabilitation do not get it. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation services led by Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) physicians have been shown to improve functioning, independence and the quality of life of persons with reduced functioning or disability. However, there is a dearth of PRM physicians in low to middle income countries (LMICs), particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. One potential solution to this lack of specialists is the establishment of PRM training programs, which are currently lacking. The International Rehabilitation Forum (IRF) developed and implemented a fellowship program to train physicians in rehabilitation medicine and has been successful in Ghana, Ethiopia and Cameroon, all LMICs in sub-Saharan Africa. However, ongoing challenges include inadequate PRM trainers, availability of logistics and services for hands on experience, and funding. The fellowship program has a promising future and an ultimate goal of having locally trained fellows leading the program and expanding it to other LMICs. There has however been no publication of the process followed to achieve this or of a similar process undertaken anywhere in Africa. The process followed in this publication highlights the journey from engaging stakeholders to the admission of new and current fellows in training.

QOL-03. Beyond Survival: Clinical Rehabilitation and Functional Optimization Pearls for the Neuro-Oncologist

Over the past decades, major advances in treatment for pediatric brain tumors have led to higher survival rates. Management including surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiation have led to prolonged survival though each comes with potential deleterious impact upon a child's level of function. While function-sparing treatments continue to be developed and utilized each year, the standard of care for many conditions leaves our patients with the potential for worsening function. The areas of mobility, activities of daily living, cognition, communication and swallow are all potentially impacted. Rehabilitation medicine specialists focus on detecting impairments, addressing them with practical interventions and improving the function our shared patients. Unfortunately, there is a worldwide scarcity of rehabilitation medicine physicians and the role of improving function often falls into the hands of the neuro-oncologist. A number of practical clinical assessments and interventions utilized by rehabilitation medicine specialists can be translated to the toolbox of the neuro-oncoligst. The aim of this presentation is to provide the neuro-oncologist with further abilities to enhance function with interventions that typically require low time investment. Topics covered will include the following: 1. What is spasticity, when is it necessary to treat and how is it treated? 2. Leg braces -- who needs them, who doesn't and what are the goals? 3. What physical exam signs can be utilized to detect peripheral neuropathy early and inform further treatment decisions with agents such as Vincristine. 4. What aspects of a gait assessment are high yield in detecting concern for clinical progression? The goal of this talk is high yield and low time investment.. It is unfortunately not applicable for a poster presentation. A minimum amount of time would be 15 minutes. If less time is available for the this presentation, a photo/video-based, rapid-fire format (similar to Tik-Tok content) could be utilized.

Observational Studies: Specific Considerations for the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Physician.

The development of high-quality research is desired in all healthcare fields. Experimental and nonexperimental designs are used to investigate the effect or association of an intervention and clinical or surrogate outcome. The aims of these methods are to improve knowledge and to develop new strategies to manage a disease or condition. Randomized clinical trials are considered one of the standard methods to test the efficacy of a new drug or intervention; however, they are costly, have reduced generalizability, and cannot be feasible in all scenarios. Well-designed observational studies can provide valuable information regarding exposure factor and the event under investigation. In physical and rehabilitation medicine, where complex procedures and multiple risk factors can be involved in the same disease, the use of observational study must be planned in detail and a priori to avoid overestimations. In this article, we will give an overview of the methods used for observational design studies in physical and rehabilitation medicine using clinical examples to illustrate each method. We will describe when it is appropriate and how to use the observational studies in different scenarios explaining how to deal with potential bias and confounders using the adequate design and statistical plan for the situation.

2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Evidence-based position paper of the UEMS PRM on the role of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) physician in the management of children and adults with spinal dysraphism.

Spinal dysraphism (SD) or spina bifida (SB) is a congenital deformity that results from embryonic neural tube closure failure during fetal development. This evidence-based position paper represents the official position of the European Union through the UEMS PRM Section. This paper aims to evaluate the role of the physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physician and PRM practice for children and adults with spinal dysraphism. A systematic literature review and a consensus procedure involved all European countries delegates represented in the UEMS PRM section through a Delphi process. The systematic literature review is reported together with thirty-two recommendations resulting from the Delphi procedure. The professional role of the PRM physician requires specific expertise in the treatment of patients with SD to plan, lead and monitor the rehabilitation process in an interdisciplinary setting and to participate in the assessment of the needs of these patients in the transitional phase from childhood to adulthood, with particular attention to the activity limitation and participation restriction.

Advancing our field by academically advancing pediatric rehabilitation medicine physicians.

Academic promotion is desired by many faculty practicing at academic medical institutions, but the criteria for promotion often appear opaque to many physician faculty. In nearly all cases, evidence of scholarship is required regardless of academic track. Academic advancement can be stymied by unclear expectations, lack of protected time to engage in scholarly projects, insufficient evidence of dissemination, and limited guidance, mentorship and sponsorship. In addition to being important for promotion, scholarship is an essential aspect of academic medicine because it helps inform and advance the science. Pursuing academic excellence is an important goal for pediatric rehabilitation medicine faculty members because it helps advance the care of children with disabilities and the field itself. Pediatric rehabilitation medicine faculty in the clinician educator or clinician leader tracks are encouraged to understand the criteria for advancement, seek out mentorship, scholarize their career ikigai and identify opportunities to demonstrate academic excellence.

Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for management of diabetes mellitus related neurological and musculoskeletal complications.

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the most common metabolic disorders in the world. It can result in several neurological and musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. These conditions adversely affect the mobility, community functioning and quality of life for the patient with DM. Rehabilitation Medicine Physicians (Physiatrists) can offer both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for the accurate diagnosis and optimal management of neurological and MSK conditions associated with DM. These include diagnostic tests such as Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography, therapeutic interventions in form of pharmacological management of symptoms, prescription of appropriate physical therapy, occupational therapeutic exercise, injections, as well as psychosocial and cognitive interventions. A physiatrist can provide expert advice on musculoskeletal disorders in patients with DM, as they are formally trained in the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of MSK conditions. A multidisciplinary team for DM should include a physiatrist as one of the key members. This can help effectively address neurological and MSK disorders related to DM.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Еarly Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Cerebral Stroke

Carrying out resuscitation procedures in the intensive care unit (ICU) aimed at maintaining and restoring the patient’s vital functions, the use of specialized resuscitation equipment and bed rest simultaneously lead to aggravation of the patient’s condition. The consequences of being in the ICU may also include the development of the post-intensive care syndrome (PIT syndrome), the prevention of which is the main goal of early rehabilitation with the participation of the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team of specialists (MDRT) led by a physical and rehabilitation medicine physician. Specialized medical rehabilitation carried out by MDRT is extremely beneficial for all neurological conditions, resulting in substantial savings in ongoing care costs, especially for ICU patients. The foreign and domestic research experience indicates a reduction in healthcare costs when introducing early rehabilitation in the ICU by reducing the duration of the patient’s stay in the expensive round-the-clock bed and lowering the patient’s home care costs or continuing rehabilitation activities at the second and third stages, as well as saving precious time for effective recovery of the developed functional deficits. It may seem that rehabilitation in the ICU with the participation of MDRT is more expensive than the work of one department doctor and a nurse. However, this article provides evidence of the economic efficiency of the MDRT work on the analysis of the results of the pilot project “Development of the Medical Rehabilitation System in the Russian Federation”, as well as the analysis of clinical cases of the Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia. So, in the absence of early rehabilitation in the ICU, the patient’s stay is delayed and the number of re-hospitalizations to the unit increases. Thus, the results of early medical rehabilitation will have a direct impact on reducing the costs associated with bed-days reducing, providing patient’s care, changing the working life of relatives, pensions of patients and their caregivers.