<abstract><title><italic>Abstract.</italic></title> Hourly evapotranspiration (ET) crop coefficients (K<sub>c</sub>) are needed to optimize the effectiveness and efficiency of high-frequency micro- and sprinkler irrigation practices involving the application of water multiple times a day. However, not much is known about the daily and seasonal patterns and magnitudes in hourly K<sub>c</sub> values for soybean. In addition, locally developed K<sub>c</sub> values are necessary for more robust within-season irrigation management, crop ET estimation, and water balance analyses. Hourly and daily K<sub>c</sub> functions were developed for soybean in south-central Nebraska through extensive field research. Actual crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>a</sub>) was measured using a Bowen ratio energy balance system. Daily crop coefficients were calculated as K<sub>c</sub> = ET<sub>a</sub>/ET<sub>ref</sub>, wherein reference (potential) evapotranspiration (ET<sub>ref</sub>) was calculated using the Penman-Monteith equation with a fixed canopy resistance for both alfalfa-reference (ET<sub>r</sub>) and grass-reference (ET<sub>o</sub>) surfaces. The K<sub>c</sub> values were derived in two forms: (1) a single (normal or average K<sub>c</sub>) K<sub>cr</sub> based on ET<sub>r</sub>, and K<sub>co</sub> based on ET<sub>o</sub>; and (2) a basal coefficient (K<sub>cbr</sub>) based on ET<sub>r</sub>, and K<sub>cbo</sub> based on ET<sub>o</sub>. The seasonal patterns of variation of K<sub>cr</sub>, K<sub>co</sub>, K<sub>cbr</sub>, and K<sub>cbo</sub> were examined on five different temporal base scales: days after emergence (DAE), cumulative growing degree days (GDD), leaf area index (LAI), fractional green canopy groundcover (CC), and plant phenology (V and R stages). The 2007 and 2008 growing season ET<sub>a</sub> totals were 535 and 514 mm, respectively. Extreme hourly K<sub>c</sub> values were frequently observed in the early morning and late afternoon hours when ET<sub>a</sub> was very low relative to ET<sub>r</sub> and ET<sub>o</sub>. Daily means of the 10 to 13 hourly values computed for K<sub>cr</sub> ranged from 0.25 to 1.06 in 2007 and from 0.15 to 1.02 in 2008, whereas those computed for K<sub>co</sub> ranged from 0.39 to 1.37 in 2007 and from 0.22 to 1.29 in 2008. Daily K<sub>cr</sub> and K<sub>co</sub> values calculated based on daily data ranged from 0.20 to 1.12 and from 0.27 to 1.47, respectively. Comparison of all daily means of hourly coefficients with the corresponding daily coefficients in one-to-one graphs and zero-origin based regression of the former on the latter revealed linear regression coefficients of 0.92 (2007 K<sub>cr</sub>), 0.95 (2008 K<sub>cr</sub>), 0.96 (2007 K<sub>co</sub>), and 0.97 (2008 K<sub>co</sub>), with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.78 or better. On average, hourly K<sub>c</sub> values were about 4% to 8% lower that the corresponding daily values. Substantial diurnal variability was observed in K<sub>co</sub> and K<sub>cr</sub> measured during daylight hours (ranging from 0.1-0.2 to 1.5-1.6) from early morning to late afternoon (8:00 to 18:00), and the range of variability was substantially dependent on the coincident V and R stages. The relationship between K<sub>c</sub> and LAI was best represented by two regression trend lines: one representing crop development from its beginning up to the start of senescence, and the other representing crop development thereafter. A similar break in the regression trend line was observed in the relationship between basal K<sub>c</sub> and GDD. In contrast, the relationship between K<sub>c</sub> and fractional CC was not biphasic and could be modeled with one regression trend line. The FAO-56 tabulated K<sub>co</sub> values and those measured in this research were significantly different (p < 0.05). Thus, the FAO-56 values, if used for south-central Nebraska soil, climate, and management practices or similar conditions, would not be able to provide accurate ET<sub>a</sub> and crop water requirement estimates. Because this research proved that K<sub>co</sub> and K<sub>cr</sub> values are not constant during the day from dawn to dusk, using daily average K<sub>co</sub> or K<sub>cr</sub> values would not be able to provide robust and precise determination of crop irrigation requirements for irrigation practices delivered more than once per day. The crop coefficients developed in this research as a function of several base scales should provide crop consultants, extension service personnel, agronomists, irrigation practitioners, and other irrigation and water management professionals with robust and accurate methods for choosing and applying crop coefficients to be used for more precise determination of ET<sub>a</sub> and water requirements, thus leading to more efficient and effective seasonal soybean irrigation management.