Refractory Hypoxemia Research Articles

Postoperative conditions of rehabilitative interest in lung transplantation: a systematic review.

Lung transplantation is an elective treatment option for end-stage respiratory diseases in which all medical therapy options have been exhausted. The current study aimed to identify updated information on the postoperative conditions that may impair rehabilitation after lung transplantation and to provide specific considerations of their clinical relevance during the recovery process. The present study is a systematic review conducted by searching three primary databases: the United States National Library of Medicine PubMed system, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The databases were searched for articles published from database inception until May 2024; at the end of the selection process, 27 documents were included in the final analysis. The retrieved material identified 19 conditions of rehabilitative interest that potentially affect the postoperative course: graft dysfunction, dysphagia, postsurgical pain, cognitive impairment, chronic lung allograft dysfunction-bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, phrenic nerve injury, delayed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning, airway clearance, refractory hypoxemia, mediastinitis, reduced oxidative capacity, sternal dehiscence, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), gastroparesis, ossification of the elbow, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, airway dehiscence, recurrent pleural effusion, and scapular prolapse. Although some patients are not amenable to rehabilitation techniques, others can significantly improve with rehabilitation.

Progress in cytokine research for ARDS: A comprehensive review.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical form of acute respiratory failure characterized by diffuse alveolar damage, refractory hypoxemia, and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, resulting in high mortality. Dysregulated inflammation, driven by cytokines, is central to ARDS pathogenesis, progression, and prognosis. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the role of cytokines in ARDS and evaluates their potential as therapeutic targets, offering new insights for clinical management. A comprehensive analysis of recent studies was conducted to explore the roles of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-10, IL-22) in ARDS pathogenesis and to assess current and emerging therapies targeting these cytokines. Pro-inflammatory cytokines are crucial in initiating inflammatory responses and lung injury in early ARDS, while anti-inflammatory cytokines help regulate and resolve inflammation. Targeted therapies, such as IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors, show potential in managing ARDS, particularly in COVID-19, but their clinical efficacy is still debated. Combination therapy strategies may enhance outcomes, but further large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to establish their safety and efficacy. Understanding cytokine regulation in ARDS could lead to innovative therapeutic approaches. Future research should focus on cytokine roles across ARDS subtypes and stages and develop biomarker-driven, individualized treatments.

Clinical Analysis of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Preterm Infants at Different Gestational Ages: A National Retrospective Multicenter Study.

This study aimed to investigate clinical features of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in preterm infants with a gestational age (GA) < 34 weeks in China. The clinical data of 434 preterm infants with GA < 34 weeks, treated with iNO in the neonatology departments of eight Class A tertiary hospitals in China over a 10-year period from January 2013 to December 2022, were included in this retrospective multicenter investigation. The infants were divided into three groups based on GA: 24 to 27 weeks (extremely preterm infants), 28 to 31 weeks (very preterm infants), and 32 to 33 weeks (moderate preterm infants). The use of iNO, perinatal data, incidence and mortality of indication for iNO treatment, therapeutic effects of iNO, incidence of short-term complications for iNO treatment, and mortality were compared among these three groups. Over the past 10 years, the proportion of iNO use was highest in extremely preterm infants each year. The lower the GA, the higher the iNO use rate: 4.20% for GA 24 to 27 weeks, 1.54% for GA 28 to 31 weeks, and 0.85% for GA 32 to 33 weeks. There was no significant difference in the therapeutic effect of iNO among the three groups. The incidence of neonatal pulmonary hemorrhage, neonatal shock, late-onset diseases, retinopathy of prematurity requiring intervention, intracranial hemorrhage (grade 3 or 4), periventricular leukomalacia, neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (≥stage II), and moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia was highest in extremely preterm infants and increased with decreasing GA. Mortality was negatively correlated with GA and birth weight. The highest rate of iNO treatment in 24 to 27 weeks' preterm infants was due to hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF), whereas the highest rate of iNO treatment in 32 to 33 weeks' preterm infants was due to documented persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). The rates of iNO treatment due to HRF and documented PPHN were 54.3 and 60.6%, respectively, in extremely preterm infants, significantly higher than in very preterm and moderate preterm infants (all p < 0.05). Within the same GA group, the proportion of preterm infants treated with iNO for HRF was lower than that for documented PPHN (all p < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between HRF and documented PPHN treated with iNO (all p > 0.05). Among preterm infants with GA < 34 weeks, the rate of iNO usage was highest in extremely preterm infants. However, iNO failed to improve the clinical outcome of extremely preterm infants with refractory hypoxemia, and there was no significant difference in the therapeutic effect of iNO among preterm infants with different GAs.

Answer: Connecting the dots: a rare cause for refractory hypoxaemia.

Answer: Connecting the dots: a rare cause for refractory hypoxaemia.

Question: Connecting the dots: a rare cause for refractory hypoxaemia.

Question: Connecting the dots: a rare cause for refractory hypoxaemia.

156: Use of Dual Oxygenator Therapy for Patients with Refractory Hypoxemia and Hypercarbia despite maximal Extra-corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support

156: Use of Dual Oxygenator Therapy for Patients with Refractory Hypoxemia and Hypercarbia despite maximal Extra-corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support

Understanding Causes of Death in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Narrative Review.

To provide a comprehensive summary of the published data on cause of death in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). PubMed (January 2015 to April 2024), bibliographies of relevant articles, and ARDS Network and Prevention & Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (PETAL) network websites. Observational studies and clinical trials that reported on cause of death in greater than or equal to 30 patients with ARDS, not obtained from death certificates. Animal studies, case reports, review articles, study protocols, and studies in pediatrics were excluded. Causes of death among ARDS patients who died were extracted and tabulated along with other pertinent study characteristics. We identified 15 observational studies (nine non-COVID ARDS, five COVID-related ARDS; one both) and five clinical trials (all non-COVID ARDS). Mutually exclusive prespecified categories were used for recording the cause of death in only eight studies although studies differed in the categories included and their definitions. When multiple organ failure was a predetermined category, it was the most common cause of death recorded (~50% of deaths), followed by respiratory causes with proportions varying from 16% to 42% depending on nomenclature (e.g., refractory hypoxemia, pulmonary causes) and definitions. However, the largest observational study in non-COVID ARDS (964 deaths), did not include multiple organ failure as a predetermined category, and found that pulmonary failure (42%) and cardiac failure (37%) were the most common causes of death. In COVID-related ARDS observational studies, pulmonary reasons were the most reported cause of death (up to 88%). Few studies have reported cause of death in patients with ARDS. In those that do, cause of death categories and definitions used are heterogeneous. Further research is needed to see whether a more rigorous and unified approach to assigning and reporting cause of death in ARDS would help identify more relevant endpoints for the assessment of targeted treatments in clinical trials.

Modes of administration of nitric oxide devices and ventilators flow-by impact the delivery of pre-determined concentrations

BackgroundNitric oxide (NO) is a strong vasodilator, selectively directed on pulmonary circulation through inhaled administration. In adult intensive care units (ICU), it is mainly used for refractory hypoxemia in mechanically ventilated patients. Several medical delivery devices have been developed to deliver inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). The main purpose of those devices is to guarantee an accurate inspiratory NO concentration, whatever the ventilator used, with NO2 concentrations lower than 0.3 ppm. We hypothesized that the performances of the different available iNO delivery systems could depend on their working principle and could be influenced by the ventilator settings. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of seven different iNO-devices combined with different ICU ventilators’ flow-by to reach inspiratory NO concentration targets and to evaluate their potential risk of toxicity.MethodsWe tested seven iNO-devices on a test-lung connected to distinct ICU ventilators offering four different levels of flow-by. We measured the flow in the inspiratory limb of the patient circuit and the airway pressure. The nitric oxide/nitrogen (NO/N2) flow was measured on the administration line of the iNO-devices. NO and NO2 concentrations were measured in the test-lung using an electrochemical analyzer.ResultsWe identified three iNO-device generations based on the way they deliver NO flow: “Continuous”, “Sequential to inspiratory phase” (I-Sequential) and “Proportional to inspiratory and expiratory ventilator flow” (Proportional). Median accuracy of iNO concentration measured in the test lung was 2% (interquartile range, IQR -19; 36), -23% (IQR -29; -17) and 0% (IQR -2; 0) with Continuous, I-Sequential and Proportional devices, respectively. Increased ventilator flow-by resulted in decreased iNO concentration in the test-lung with Continuous and I-Sequential devices, but not with Proportional ones. NO2 formation measured to assess potential risks of toxicity never exceeded the predefined safety target of 0.5 ppm. However, NO2 concentrations higher than or equal to 0.3 ppm, a concentration that can cause bronchoconstriction, were observed in 19% of the different configurations.ConclusionWe identified three different generations of iNO-devices, based on their gas administration modalities, that were associated with highly variable iNO concentrations’ accuracy. Ventilator’s flow by significantly impacted iNO concentration. Only the Proportional devices permitted to accurately deliver iNO whatever the conditions and the ventilators tested.

Evaluation of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Generation Systems at Altitude.

Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) is a selective pulmonary vasodilator delivered from compressed gas cylinders filled to 2,200 psig (137.8 bar) with 800 ppm of NO in a balance of nitrogen. NO is currently FDA-approved for use in term or near-term infants with hypoxemia and signs of pulmonary hypertension in the absence of cardiac disease. INO has also been shown to improve oxygenation in adults with refractory hypoxemia. Current doctrine precludes the use of NO during military aeromedical transport owing to the requirement for large compressed gas cylinders. We performed a bench evaluation of 2 delivery systems that create NO from room air without the need for pressurized cylinders. We evaluated 2 portable nitric oxide INO generation systems (LungFit PH, Beyond Air Inc, Garden City, NJ and a prototype NO generator, Odic Inc, Littleton, MA) at ground level, 8,000, and 14,000 feet (2,437 and 4,267 meter) simulated altitude in an altitude chamber. The output from each device was injected into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit that was attached to a test lung. A 731 ventilator (Zoll Medical, Chelmsford, MA) and T1 (Hamilton Medical, Reno, NV) were used employing 24 combinations of ventilator settings each repeated in duplicate. An INOmax DS IR was used to measure delivered INO and NO2 via a sampling line attached in the ventilator circuit inspiratory limb. A fast response oxygen analyzer (O2CAP, Oxigraf Inc, Sunnyvale, CA) was used to measure inspired FiO2. Target INO concentration was 20 ppm. Across all ventilator settings, the LungFit device delivered INO was 19.8 ± 1.6 ppm, 16.1 ± 1.9 ppm, and 11.6 ± 1.7 ppm at ground level, 8,000 ft (2,437 meter), and 14,000 ft (4,267 meter), respectively. The Odic device delivered INO dose was 20.6 ± 1.4 ppm, 21.3 ± 5.5 ppm, and 20.4 ± 9.1 ppm at ground level, 8,000 ft (2,437 meter), and 14,000 ft (4,267 meter), respectively. Both devices delivered a reliable INO dose at ground level. Altitude significantly affected INO delivery accuracy at 14,000 ft (4,267 meter) (P < 0.01) with both devices and at 8,000 ft (2,437 meter) (P < 0.01) with LungFit. Differences in INO dosage were not statistically significant with the Odic device at 8,000 ft (2,437 meter)(P > 0.05) although there were large variations with selected ventilator settings. With careful monitoring, devices creating INO from room air without cylinders could be used during aeromedical transport without the need for pressurized cylinders.

Life-Saving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Combined with Hemoperfusion for a Pregnant Woman with COVID-19 Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The pandemic of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) affected millions of people worldwide, causing high mortality and morbidity, especially in pregnancy. The management of COVID-19, which progresses to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome during pregnancy, is very challenging. Herein we report a 35-year-old pregnant woman in her second trimester (16 weeks of gestational age) who presented with a productive cough and progressive dyspnea. She was diagnosed with a severe COVID-19 infection, confirmed by PCR testing. During hospitalization, she developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and was referred to a tertiary hospital. Despite the use of antiviral therapy, steroids, mechanical ventilators, and muscle relaxants, she still had significant hypoxemia. Thus, she underwent veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Due to the limitations of immunomodulatory therapy in pregnancy, our team decided to perform extracorporeal cytokine removal therapy with HA330 adsorbent hemoperfusion to remove circulatory cytokines and proinflammatory mediators and suppress the hyperinflammatory response. After 3 consecutive days of hemoperfusion, her C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were controlled. On the 13th day of ICU admission, her clinical conditions, including pulmonary function, were improving, and she was successfully weaned off the VV-ECMO. A chest X-ray showed she was completely free of ARDs. The patient left the hospital with good clinical status and a viable fetus. We conclude that pregnant women infected with COVID-19 who develop refractory hypoxemia with cytokine storm syndrome may benefit from combined VV-ECMO and hemoperfusion as a rescue therapy.

Leveraging Hypotension Prediction Index to Forecast LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury and Inflammation in a Porcine Model: Exploring the Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor in Circulatory Shock.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical illness in critically unwell patients, characterized by refractory hypoxemia and shock. This study evaluates an early detection tool and investigates the relationship between hypoxia and circulatory shock in ARDS, to improve diagnostic precision and therapy customization. We used a porcine model, inducing ARDS with mechanical ventilation and intratracheal plus intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. Hemodynamic changes were monitored using an Acumen IQ sensor and a ForeSight Elite sensor connected to the HemoSphere platform. We evaluated tissue damage, inflammatory response, and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) alterations using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry. The results showed severe hypotension and increased heart rates post-LPS exposure, with a notable rise in the hypotension prediction index (HPI) during acute lung injury (p = 0.024). Tissue oxygen saturation dropped considerably in the right brain region. Interestingly, post-injury HIF-2α levels were lower at the end of the experiment. Our findings imply that the HPI can effectively predict ARDS-related hypotension. HIF expression levels may serve as possible markers of rapid ARDS progression. Further research should be conducted on the clinical value of this novel approach in critical care, as well as the relationship between the HIF pathway and ARDS-associated hypotension.

Pirfenidone Alleviates Inflammation and Fibrosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Modulating the Transforming Growth Factor-β/Smad Signaling Pathway.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs as an acute onset condition, and patients present with diffuse alveolar damage, refractory hypoxemia, and non-cardiac pulmonary edema. ARDS progresses through an initial exudative phase, an inflammatory phase, and a final fibrotic phase. Pirfenidone, a powerful anti-fibrotic agent, is known as an agent that inhibits the progression of fibrosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In this study, we studied the treatment efficiency of pirfenidone on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and bleomycin-induced ARDS using rats. The ARDS rat model was created by the intratracheal administration of 3 mg/kg LPS of and 3 mg/kg of bleomycin dissolved in 0.2 mL of normal saline. The pirfenidone treatment group was administered 100 or 200 mg/kg of pirfenidone dissolved in 0.5 mL distilled water orally 10 times every 2 days for 20 days. The administration of LPS and bleomycin intratracheally increased lung injury scores and significantly produced pro-inflammatory cytokines. ARDS induction increased the expressions of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1/Smad-2 signaling factors. Additionally, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9/tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 imbalance occurred, resulting in enhanced fibrosis-related factors. Treatment with pirfenidone strongly suppressed the expressions of TGF-β1/Smad-2 signaling factors and improved the imbalance of MMP-9/TIMP-1 compared to the untreated group. These effects led to a decrease in fibrosis factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines, promoting the recovery of damaged lung tissue. These results of this study showed that pirfenidone administration suppressed inflammation and fibrosis in the ARDS animal model. Therefore, pirfenidone can be considered a new early treatment for ARDS.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure: A Narrative Review.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for respiratory failure in the intensive care unit continues to have an expanded role in select patients. While acute respiratory distress syndrome remains the most common indication, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be used in other causes of refractory hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia. The most common configuration is veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; however, in specific cases of refractory hypoxemia or right ventricular failure, some patients may benefit from veno-pulmonary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or veno-venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patient selection and extracorporeal circuit management are essential to successful outcomes. This narrative review explores the physiology of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, indications and contraindications, ventilator management, extracorporeal circuit management, troubleshooting hypoxemia, complications, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning in patients with respiratory failure. As the footprint of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation continues to expand, it is essential that clinicians understand the underlying physiology and management of these complex patients.

Veno-venous ECMO with Bicaval Cannula for Refractory Hypoxemia in a Child

Veno-venous ECMO with Bicaval Cannula for Refractory Hypoxemia in a Child

Beta-blockade for the treatment of refractory hypoxaemia during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An in-silico study.

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is used for refractory hypoxemia, although despite this, in high cardiac output states, hypoxaemia may persist. The administration of beta-blockers has been suggested as an approach in this scenario, however the physiological consequences of this intervention are not clear. We performed an in-silico study using a previously described mathematical model to evaluate the effect of beta-blockade on mixed venous and arterial saturations (, SaO2), in three different clinical scenarios and considered the potential effects of beta-blockers on, cardiac output, oxygen consumption and recirculation. Additionally we assessed the interaction of beta-blockade with haemoglobin concentration. In scenario 1: simulating a patient with high cardiac output and partial lung shunt decreased from increased 53.5% to 44.7% despite SaO2 rising from 74.2% to 79.2%. In scenario 2 simulating a patient with high cardiac output and complete lung shunt remained unchanged at 52.2% and SaO2 rose from 71.9% to 85%. In scenario 3 a patient with normal cardiac output and high recirculation fell from 50.8% to 25.5% and also fell from 82.4% to to 78.3%. Across the remaining modelling examples the effect on varied but oxygen delivery was consistently reduced across all scenarios. The administration of beta-blockers for refractory hypoxemia during VV ECMO are unpredictable and may reduce oxygen delivery, although this will vary with patient and circuit features. This study does not support the use of beta-blockers for this indication.

Exploring the lung-gut direction of the gut-lung axis in patients with ARDS.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents a life-threatening inflammatory reaction marked by refractory hypoxaemia and pulmonary oedema. Despite advancements in treatment perspectives, ARDS still carries a high mortality rate, often due to systemic inflammatory responses leading to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS). Indeed, the deterioration and associated mortality in patients with acute lung injury (LI)/ARDS is believed to originate alongside respiratory failure mainly from the involvement of extrapulmonary organs, a consequence of the complex interaction between initial inflammatory cascades related to the primary event and ongoing mechanical ventilation-induced injury resulting in multiple organ failure (MOF)and potentially death. Even though recent research has increasingly highlighted the role of the gastrointestinal tract in this process, the pathophysiology of gut dysfunction in patients with ARDS remains mainly underexplored. This review aims to elucidate the complex interplay between lung and gut in patients with LI/ARDS. We will examine various factors, including systemic inflammation, epithelial barrier dysfunction, the effects of mechanical ventilation (MV), hypercapnia, and gut dysbiosis. Understanding these factors and their interaction may provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of ARDS and potential therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Assessing Right Ventricle Over Time in Patients on Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Insights From Serial Echocardiography.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is often used in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with refractory hypoxemia. There is limited literature highlighting the development of right ventricular (RV) failure while on ECMO. We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study including 70 patients who were placed on veno-venous (VV)-ECMO for respiratory failure at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 2018 and June 2022 and had at least two post-ECMO transthoracic echoes. The primary outcomes were the incidence and progression of RV dysfunction and dilatation. The secondary outcome was in-patient mortality. Among 70 patients in our cohort, 60.6% had a normal RV function at the time of ECMO placement, whereas only 42% had a normal RV function at the second post-ECMO echo. On multinomial regression, a moderate decrease in RV function was associated with ECMO flow (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32, p = 0.001) and ECMO duration (OR = 1.01, p = 0.01). A moderately dilated RV size was also associated with ECMO flow (OR = 2.62, p < 0.001) and ECMO duration (OR = 1.02, p = 0.02). An increasing degree of RV dysfunction was associated with worse outcomes. Our study showed that the increasing duration and flow of VV-ECMO correlated with progressive RV dilatation and dysfunction, which were associated with poor survival.

Outcomes following additional drainage during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A single-center retrospective study.

Refractory hypoxemia during veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may require an additional cannula (VV-V ECMO) to improve oxygenation. This intervention includes risk of recirculation and other various adverse events (AEs) such as injury to the lung, cannula malpositioning, bleeding, circuit or cannula thrombosis requiring intervention (i.e., clot), or cerebral injury. During the study period, 23 of 142 V-V ECMO patients were converted to VV-V utilizing two separate cannulas for bi-caval drainage with an additional upper extremity cannula placed for return. Of those, 21 had COVID-19. In the first 24h after conversion, ECMO flow rates were higher (5.96 vs 5.24L/min, p = .002) with no significant change in pump speed (3764 vs 3630revolutions per minute [RPMs], p = .42). Arterial oxygenation (PaO2) increased (87 vs 64mmHg, p < .0001) with comparable pre-oxygenator venous saturation (61 vs 53.3, p = .12). By day 5, flows were similar to pre-conversion values at lower pump speed but with improved PaO2. Unadjusted survival was similar in those converted to VV-V ECMO compared to V-V ECMO alone (70% [16/23] vs 66.4% [79/119], p = .77). In a mixed effect regression model, any incidence of AEs, demonstrated a negative impact on PaO2 in the first 48h but not at day 5. VV-V ECMO improved oxygenation with increasing flows without a significant difference in AEs or pump speed. AEs transiently impacted oxygenation. VV-V ECMO is effective and feasible strategy for refractory hypoxemia on VV-ECMO allowing for higher flow rate and unchanged pump speed.

Use of inhaled vasodilators in ARDS patients

Abstract:&#x0D; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe lung injury leading to bilateral lung opacities and severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. It results from acute inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and disruption of the alveolar-capillary membrane. ARDS management encompasses lung-protective supportive care such as lung-protective ventilation strategies. Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators show potential as adjunctive therapies for refractory hypoxemia and hold promise in improving oxygenation and reducing pulmonary vascular resistance in severe ARDS. However, their impact on mortality remains uncertain and current evidence supports their role as rescue therapies. Prudent consideration and assessment of potential benefits and risks are crucial when integrating these agents into clinical practice.

Respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation : From rescue therapy to standard tool for treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome?

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has increased substantially. With modern trials supporting its efficacy, ECMO has become an important tool in the management of severe ARDS. The objectives of this paper are to discuss ECMO physiology and configurations used for patients with ARDS, review evidence supporting the use of ECMO for ARDS, and discuss aspects of management during ECMO. Current evidence supports the use of ECMO, combined with an ultra-lung-protective approach to mechanical ventilation, in patients with ARDS who have refractory hypoxemia or hypercapnia with severe respiratory acidosis. Furthermore, data suggest that center volume and experience are important factors in the care of patients receiving ECMO. The use of extracorporeal technologies in expanded patient populations and the optimal management of patients during ECMO remain areas of investigation. This article is freely available.