Refractory Colorectal Cancer Patients Research Articles

Avenanthramide A potentiates Bim-mediated antineoplastic properties of 5-fluorouracil via targeting KDM4C/MIR17HG/GSK-3β negative feedback loop in colorectal cancer

Chemoresistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a significant challenge in treating colorectal cancer (CRC). Novel combined regimens to thwart chemoresistance are therefore urgently needed. Herein, we demonstrated that the combination of Avenanthramide A (AVN A) and 5-FU has significant therapeutic advantages against CRC. Mechanistically, AVN A directly binds to the S198 site of the histone lysine demethylase KDM4C to promote its degradation, which subsequently fosters H3K9me3 occupancy on the MIR17HG promoter to block its transcription and derepress Bim expression. AVN A enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of 5-FU via impairing the KDM4C/MIR17HG/GSK-3β negative feedback loop. Importantly, the clinical correlation of the KDM4C/MIR17HG/Bim signaling axis with 5-FU response was validated in the refractory CRC patients. We provide evidence for the enhanced effectiveness of 5-FU when combined with AVN A in chemoresistant xenografts, CRC organoids, and ApcMin/+ mouse model. Additionally, AVN A mitigated the systemic adverse effects of 5-FU. Overall, our findings demonstrate that combinatorial therapy with AVN A and 5-FU represents an appealing opportunity and highlights KDM4C/MIR17HG/GSK-3β negative feedback loop which confers therapeutically exploitable vulnerability to chemo-refractory CRC patients.

Mutant PIK3CA as a negative predictive biomarker for treatment with a highly selective PIM1 inhibitor in human colon cancer

ABSTRACT Significant improvement in targeted therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) has occurred over the past few decades since the approval of the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab. However, cetuximab is used only for patients possessing the wild-type oncogene KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF, and even most of these eventually acquire therapeutic resistance, via activation of parallel oncogenic pathways such as RAS-MAPK or PI3K/Akt/mTOR. The two aforementioned pathways also contribute to the development of therapeutic resistance in CRC patients, due to compensatory and feedback mechanisms. Therefore, combination drug therapies (versus monotherapy) targeting these multiple pathways may be necessary for further efficacy against CRC. In this study, we identified PIK3CA mutant (PIK3CA MT) as a determinant of resistance to SMI-4a, a highly selective PIM1 kinase inhibitor, in CRC cell lines. In CRC cell lines, SMI-4a showed its effect only in PIK3CA wild type (PIK3CA WT) cell lines, while PIK3CA MT cells did not respond to SMI-4a in cell death assays. In vivo xenograft and PDX experiments confirmed that PIK3CA MT is responsible for the resistance to SMI-4a. Inhibition of PIK3CA MT by PI3K inhibitors restored SMI-4a sensitivity in PIK3CA MT CRC cell lines. Taken together, these results demonstrate that sensitivity to SMI-4a is determined by the PIK3CA genotype and that co-targeting of PI3K and PIM1 in PIK3CA MT CRC patients could be a promising and novel therapeutic approach for refractory CRC patients.

A phase IIb study of ramucirumab in combination with TAS102 versus TAS102 monotherapy in metastatic, chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients: The RAMTAS trial of the German AIO (KRK-0316).

TPS3617 Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with progressive disease on/after or who are intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, anti-angiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies have limited therapeutic options and a dismal prognosis, with a median survival below 6 months. Recently, Trifluridin/Tipiracil (TAS102) significantly improved survival in patients with refractory mCRC and ramucirumab has been approved in combination with FOLFIRI for the treatment of patients with mCRC after prior FOLFOX/bevacizumab first line therapy. Previous studies on both components provide a strong rationale to conduct a randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in combination with TAS102 in patients with refractory mCRC to improve efficacy and prevent resistance. Methods: This is an interventional, randomized, open label, multicenter, phase IIb study in patients with advanced mCRC. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 and receive either ramucirumab and TAS102 (ramucirumab 8 mg/kg on d1+15, q4w and TAS102 35 mg/m² on d1-5 and d8-12, q4w) or TAS102 alone. Primary endpoint is overall survival as assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, assuming a 6 months survival probability of 70% with ramucirumab in combination with TAS102 and 58% with TAS102 alone. Treatment groups are compared using the log-rank test. A total of 144 patients will be enrolled at 30 sites (1-sided alpha 0.10, power 0.80). Main secondary endpoints are overall response rate, disease control rate, progression free survival and quality of life. In addition, a large comprehensive translational research program will be conducted to identify novel predictive and prognostic biomarkers. The study started in December 2018. By February 2019, a total of 3 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03520946.

Abstract B037: Macrophage repolarization therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: CCR5 inhibition

Abstract The influence of the local immune response on the clinical course of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been analyzed extensively. Analyzing the invasive margin of human CRC liver metastases, we identified a protumoral mechanism of T-cell-derived CCL5 that leads to immune cell exploitation by tumor cells. Two distinct subsets of myeloid cells produce CXCL9/CXCL10, which induce an influx of T cells into the invasive margin. CCL5 is produced by these exhausted T cells and stimulates tumor cell proliferation and invasive behavior via CCR5 on tumor cells and macrophages. CCR5 inhibition in patient-derived functional in vitro organotypic culture models induced macrophage repolarization with anti-tumoral effects. These immunomodulatory and anti-tumoral effects of CCR5 blockade then could be confirmed in a phase I trial with a CCR5 antagonist in advanced refractory CRC patients with liver metastases. Amelioration of tumor-promoting inflammation on the tumor tissue level and objective tumor responses in advanced metastatic CRC patients were observed. Citation Format: Niels Halama, Inka Zoernig, Anna Berthel, Christoph Kahlert, Fee Klupp, Meggy Suarez-Carmona, Juergen Krauss, Karsten Brand, Felix Lasitschka, Tina Lerchl, Claudia Luckner-Minden, Alexis Ulrich, Juergen Weitz, Martin Schneider, Markus W. Buechler, Laurence Zitvogel, Thomas Herrmann, Axel Benner, Christina Kunz, Stephan Luecke, Christoph Springfeld, Christine Falk, Dirk Jaeger. Macrophage repolarization therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: CCR5 inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Second CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; 2016 Sept 25-28; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B037.

Review on TAS-102 development and its use for metastatic colorectal cancer

TAS-102 is the combination of trifluridine (TFT) with tipiracil (TPI) in a 1:0.5 molar ratio. TFT is a fluoropyrimidine that retains cytotoxic activity in 5-fluorouracil resistant cell lines. Due to TFT short half-life, early clinical development was discouraging. Thereafter, TFT was shown to be promptly degraded by thymidine phosphorylase, also known as platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, a pro-angiogenic protein and a poor prognosis marker in colorectal cancer. TPI is a specific antagonist of thymidine phosphorylase and led to an increase in TFT serum levels when both agents are combined. Moreover, TPI is a potential anti-angiogenic molecule and could exert antitumor actions per se. TAS-102 was tested in several Phase I studies published in the early 21st century. The best regimen was settled as 70mg/m(2)/day, q12h, orally given at days 1-5 and days 8-13, each 28days. Recently, the first Phase III trial evaluating TAS-102 in refractory colorectal cancer patients was published. The RECOURSE trial demonstrated a survival advantage of the agent over supportive care, and definitely established TAS-102 as a novel strategy in the current armamentarium against colorectal cancer. Here we review the preclinical data regarding TFT and TPI that led to the development of TAS-102, and the set of clinical data that ultimately proved that TAS-102 improved outcomes in colorectal cancer patients.

Association between cetuximab response and differential immunologic gene expression signatures in colorectal cancer metastases.

558 Background: Different immune cell infiltrates into colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors are associated with different prognoses. Tumor-associated macrophages contribute to immune evasion and accelerated tumor progression. Conversely, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes at the invasive margin of CRC liver metastases are associated with improved outcomes with chemotherapy. Cetuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and stimulates antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in vitro. However, it is unclear in humans if response to cetuximab is modulated by the immune response. We hypothesized that different immune patterns detected in gene expression profiles of CRC metastases are associated with different responses to cetuximab. Methods: We retrieved gene expression data from biopsies of metastases from 80 refractory CRC patients treated with cetuximab monotherapy (GEO GSE5851). Samples were dichotomized by cetuximab response as having either disease control (DC) or progressive disease (PD). We performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) with GenePattern 3.9.4 using gene sets of immunologic signatures obtained from the Molecular Signatures Database v5.0. Results: Among the 68 patients with response annotated, 25 had DC and 43 had PD. In the PD cohort, 59/1910 immunologic gene sets had false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.1. Notably, multiple gene sets upregulated in monocyte signatures were associated with PD. Also, gene sets consistent with PD1-ligated T cells compared to control activated T cells (FDR = 0.052) or IL4-treated CD4 T cells compared to controls (FDR = 0.087) were associated with PD. Conclusions: Cetuximab-resistant patients tended to have baseline increased expression of gene signatures reflective of monocytic infiltrates, consistent with also having increased expression of the IL4-treated T-cell signature. Cetuximab resistance was also associated with increased expression of the PD1-ligated T cell signature. These preliminary findings support further evaluation of the effect of differential immune infiltrates in prognosis of metastatic CRC treated with cetuximab.

Therapeutic potential of TAS-102 in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Fluoropyrimidines form the mainstay in treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. For decades 5-fluorouracil (5FU), was the major fluoropyrimidine. Currently it is usually given in a combination with leucovorin and oxaliplatin, i.e. FOLFOX, or irinotecan, i.e. FOLFIRI, or all three, i.e. FOLFIRINOX, but gradually it has been replaced by oral fluoropyrimidine prodrug formulations, such as tegafur-uracil and S-1 (both contain ftorafur), and capecitabine (Xeloda®). Novel drugs such as the antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody, bevacizumab, and the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, cetuximab, are often combined with one of these treatment options. However, when resistance emerged, no alternatives were available. TAS-102, a combination of trifluorothymidine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor TPI in a 1:0.5 ratio, is a novel oral formulation, which is active in 5FU-resistant models, both in vitro and in xenograft models. In addition to inhibition of thymidylate synthase, the major mechanism of action of classical fluoropyrimidines, TAS-102's major mechanism of action is incorporation into DNA, thereby causing DNA damage. TAS-102 also follows an alternative activation pathway via thymidine kinase, and is not a substrate for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. All together this explains the efficacy in 5FU-resistant models. In early clinical studies, the twice-daily schedule (5 days on, 2 days rest) for 2 weeks every 4 weeks, led to a significant disease control rate in various malignancies. This schedule showed consistent activity in two randomized trials on fluoropyrimidine refractory colorectal cancer patients, reflected by an increase of 2-3 months in overall survival in the TAS-102 group compared with placebo. Considering the impressive preclinical potential of various combinations TAS-102 has the promise to become an alternative for 5FU-resistant cancer.

Biomarker signatures correlate with clinical outcome in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving bevacizumab and everolimus.

A novel combination of bevacizumab and everolimus was evaluated in refractory colorectal cancer patients in a phase II trial. In this retrospective analysis, plasma samples from 49 patients were tested for over 40 biomarkers at baseline and after one or two cycles of drug administration. Analyte levels at baseline and change on-treatment were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using univariate Cox proportional hazard modeling. Multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox modeling. Significant changes in multiple markers were observed following bevacizumab and everolimus treatment. Baseline levels of six markers significantly correlated with PFS and OS, including CRP, Gro-α, IGFBP-1, TF, ICAM-1, and TSP-2 (P < 0.05). At C2D1, changes of IGFBP-3, TGFβ-R3, and IGFBP-2 correlated with PFS and OS. Prognostic models were developed for OS and PFS (P = 0.0002 and 0.004, respectively). The baseline model for OS consisted of CRP, Gro-α, and TF, while the on-treatment model at C2D1 included IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, and TGFβ-R3. These data demonstrated that multiple biomarkers were significantly modulated in response to bevacizumab and everolimus. Several markers correlated with both PFS and OS. Interestingly, these markers are known to be associated with inflammation and IGF signaling, key modulators of mTOR biology.

A phase III study of xilonix in refractory colorectal cancer patients with weight loss.

685 Background: Xilonix, an anti-interleukin-1α true human monoclonal antibody is being assessed as cancer therapy to improve overall survival (OS) in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods: An open label multicenter randomized comparator controlled study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Xilonix in CRC complicated with cachexia. Eligible patients had metastatic CRC, failed oxaliplatin or irinotecan based chemotherapy, and lost ≥5% total body weight in the previous 6 months (m). Patients were 1:1 randomized to Xilonix (3.75 mg/kg intravenously every two weeks) or megestrol acetate (MA, oral 800 mg daily) until progression. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included assessment of patient well-being using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Platelets support tumor growth and metastasis and platelet counts increase during cancer progression. IL-1α on platelets may be a target of Xilonix and thus platelet count was a key pharmacodynamic measure. Results: 40 patients were enrolled between March 2013 and July 2014, at which time the study was halted to revise inclusion criteria to reduce screen failures. An eligibility violation excluded 1 Xilonix patient from analysis (Xilonix n=19, MA n=20). MA treatment arm had a 39% shorter median OS (2.0 versus 2.8 months) and a trend in increased risk of death (hazard ratio 2.17, p=0.17). Physical and role function worsened in patients receiving megesterol (median change of -13.3 (p=0.02), -16.7 (p=0.02) respectively), whereas in Xilonix treated patients these functions did not decline during therapy (median change 0, p=0.88 and 0, p=0.69, respectively). Xilonix patients had treatment-related reduction in platelets compared to the MA group (median -60,000/mm3, vs 10,000/mm3, p=0.03). No infusion reactions, no discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) and no related SAEs were reported for Xilonix. Conclusions: The trend in OS for Xilonix patients was encouraging and consistent with improved function and intended pharmacodynamic activity. An amended Phase III protocol has been developed to simplify enrollment for an ongoing study of Xilonix in an advanced CRC population. (NCT01767857) Clinical trial information: NCT01767857.

A randomized phase II study of two doses of vorinostat in combination with 5-FU/LV in patients with refractory colorectal cancer

Vorinostat is synergistic with 5-FU in vitro and in vivo models. A combination of these two agents was associated with clinical activity in 5-FU refractory colorectal cancer patients in a phase I clinical trial, therefore warranting the conduct of this prospective phase II study. Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized in a two-stage design to receive vorinostat at 800 or 1,400 mg/day once a day × 3, every 2 weeks. 5-FU, preceded by leucovorin, was administered as a bolus followed by a 46-h infusion on days 2 and 3 of vorinostat. A pre-specified 2-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 27/43 patients per arm was needed to deem an arm interesting for further investigation. The high-dose vorinostat arm did not reach the needed efficacy endpoint at completion of the first stage, with only 8 out of 15 patients being alive and progression free at 2 months. The low-dose vorinostat arm proceeded to accrue 43 patients with a 2-month PFS rate of 53% (23 out 43), including one partial response. The median PFS and overall survival on the low-dose arm were 2.4 and 6.5 months, respectively. Both treatment arms were well tolerated. No differences were noted in the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat at the 800- or 1,400-mg dose-levels, suggesting bioavailability saturation. While the addition of vorinostat to 5-FU resulted in 1 partial response and in some disease stabilizations, the limited activity does not warrant the unselected use of this combination in chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer.

EGFR FISH assay predicts for response to cetuximab in chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients

BackgroundStandardized conditions to distinguish subpopulations of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients more and less sensitive to cetuximab therapy remain undefined. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 85 chemorefractory CRC patients treated with cetuximab. Results were analyzed according to different score systems previously reported in colorectal and lung cancers. The primary end point of the study was identification of the EGFR FISH score that best associates with response rate (RR). ResultsUsing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off that best discriminated responders versus nonresponders to cetuximab was a mean of 2.92 EGFR gene copies per cell. This model showed sensitivity of 58.6% [95% confidence interval (CI)=47.1–70.1) and specificity of 93.3% (95% CI =80.6–100). EGFR FISH-positive patients (N=43, 50.6%) had significantly higher RR (P=0.0001) and significantly longer time to disease progression (P=0.02) than EGFR FISH negative (N=42, 49.4%). Other scoring systems resulted less accurate in discriminating patients with the highest likelihood of response to cetuximab therapy. ConclusionsCRC patients with high EGFR gene copy number have an increased likelihood to respond to cetuximab therapy. Prospective clinical trials with a careful standardization of assay conditions and pattern interpretation are urgently needed.

O5 Fixed ‘low dose’ irinotecan and raltirexed provide TTP comparable to other regimens, in oxaliplatin refractory colorectal cancer patients. The importance of disease stabilisation without administering MTD to older patients

Endothelial dysfunction links thrombotic microangiopathy to steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. We aimed to assess if the simple formula—lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)/thrombocytes (109 cells per L)—termed the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), might be valuable for the prediction of death in patients with acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.For this retrospective analysis, we analysed a training cohort (in Germany) and three validation cohorts (in Germany and the USA) of patients with acute GVHD who had received consecutive allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary endpoint was prediction of overall survival when measured at acute GVHD onset (EASIX-GVHD). We validated the prognostic strength of EASIX-GVHD for overall survival and non-relapse mortality in the three independent cohorts by calculating the prediction error (integrated Brier score), and concordance index.In the total cohort of patients with acute GVHD (n=311), EASIX-GVHD predicted overall survival in univariable and multivariable models (univariate analysis, hazard ratio [HR] for a one-fold increase 1·16, 95% CI 1·12–1·20, p=0·0004). However, in the subpopulation of patients with myeloablative conditioning (n=72), EASIX-GVHD did not predict overall survival, which is probably attributable to thrombocytopenia at GVHD onset (73 × 109 cells per L [IQR 29·75–180·00] for myeloablative conditioning vs 160 × 109 cells per L [90·0–250·5] for reduced-intensity conditioning; p<0·0001). In patients who received reduced-intensity conditioning (n=239), EASIX-GVHD was a strong predictor of overall survival (HR for a two-fold change of 1·23, 95% CI 1·13–1·34; p<0·0001) and non-relapse mortality (cause-specific HR for a two-fold change of 1·24, 1·12–1·38; p<0·0001). Model validation for prediction of overall survival and non-relapse mortality by EASIX-GVHD was successful in two independent cohorts of adult patients with reduced-intensity conditioning (n=141, n=173) and in a cohort with mainly paediatric patients (n=89).In patients with reduced-intensity conditioning, EASIX-GVHD is a powerful predictor of survival after GVHD. EASIX-GVHD could be the future basis for development of risk-adapted GVHD treatment strategies.There was no external funding source for this study.

A Fully Human Recombinant IgG-like Bispecific Antibody to Both the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and the Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor for Enhanced Antitumor Activity

Both the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) have been implicated in the tumorigenesis of a variety of cancers. Here we propose that simultaneous targeting of both receptors with a bispecific antibody would lead to enhanced antitumor activity. To this end, we produced a recombinant human IgG-like bispecific antibody, a Di-diabody, using the variable regions from two antagonistic antibodies: IMC-11F8 to EGFR and IMC-A12 to IGFR. The Di-diabody binds to both EGFR and IGFR and effectively blocked both EGF- and IGF-stimulated receptor activation and tumor cell proliferation. The Di-diabody also inherited the biological properties from both of its parent antibodies; it triggers rapid and significant IGFR internalization and degradation and mediates effective antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in a variety of tumor cells. Finally, the Di-diabody strongly inhibited the growth of two different human tumor xenografts in vivo. Our results underscore the benefits of simultaneous targeting of two tumor targets with bispecific antibodies.