Reference Glomerular Filtration Rate Research Articles

Glomerular filtration rate determined by measuring serum clearance of iohexol in unanesthetized cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) with comparison to serum symmetric dimethylarginine.

One of the more common diseases affecting zoo-managed cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) is chronic renal disease, which can impact their welfare and ultimately shortens their lifespan. Early diagnosis, for which estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) is one such tool, is imperative to help mitigate the negative impacts of this insidious disease. GFR was determined by measuring the serum clearance of iohexol in nine clinically normal, cheetahs managed under human care that presented for voluntary blood collection. A 2-sample iohexol clearance method was performed, along with serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) determination. SDMA has shown promise in humans, dogs, and cats, as an early biomarker of renal disease. Additionally, the relationship between GFR and SDMA, along with serum creatinine and BUN were analyzed. The mean values for the uncorrected GFR and corrected GFR were 2.08 ± 0.215 mL/min/kg body weight and 1.87 ± 0.173 mL/min/kg body weight, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between GFR, SDMA, serum creatinine, or BUN. Both the uncorrected and corrected iohexol-based GFR values were similar to an inulin-based GFR reference interval determined in zoo managed cheetahs and a reported domestic cat iohexol-based GFR reference interval. Serum SDMA values support previous research suggesting cheetahs have a separate reference interval from domestic cats (0-14 μg/dL). Measuring GFR by the serum clearance of iohexol shows promise as a readily available, cheap, and easily administered clearance marker that can be used in cheetahs trained for voluntary blood collection, thereby avoiding the need for anesthesia.

Application of improved glomerular filtration rate estimation by a neural network model in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Previous studies have indicated that creatinine (Cr)-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations - including the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology creatinine (CKD-EPIcr) equation without race and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation developed for the Chinese population - displayed suboptimal performance in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), which limited their clinical application for detecting changes in GFR levels in all cohorts. To develop a neural network model based on multilayer perceptron (MLP) for evaluating GFR in Chinese NLUTD patients, and compare the diagnostic performance with Cr-based multiple linear regression equations for Chinese and the CKD-EPIcr equation without race. Single-center, cross-sectional study of GFR estimation from serum Cr, demographic data, and clinical characteristics in Chinese patients with NLUTD. A total of 204 NLUTD patients, from 27 different geographic regions of China, were selected. A random sample of 141 of these subjects was included in the training sample set, and the remaining 63 patients were included in the testing sample set. The reference GFR (rGFR) was assessed by the technetium-99m-labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) double plasma sample method. A neural network model based on MLP was developed to evaluate GFR in the training sample set, which was then validated in the testing sample set and compared with Cr-based GFR equations. The MLP-based model showed significant performance improvement in evaluating the difference, absolute difference, precision, and accuracy of GFR estimation compared with the Cr-based GFR equations. Additionally, compared with the rGFR, we found that the MLP-based model provided an acceptable level of accuracy (greater than 85%, which was within a 30% deviation from the rGFR). The MLP-based model offered significant advantages in estimating GFR in Chinese NLUTD patients, and its application could be suggested in clinical practice.

99m Tc-DTPA dynamic SPECT/CT renogram in adults: feasibility and diagnostic benefit.

The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and potential advantages of 99m Tc-DTPA dynamic single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) renogram in adults. Fifty-five patients aged 19-80 years (mean 56.3) were enrolled. The imaging protocol included: day 1: 99m Tc-DTPA planar renogram, followed by planar 99m Tc-DMSA scan. Day 3: attenuation-corrected dynamic 99m Tc-DTPA SPECT renogram [DSPECT(AC)] and Cr-51 ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculation. DSPECT(AC) included an initial CT scan followed by 12 consecutive SPECT sessions acquired via continuous-mode acquisition for a total of 24 min. Fast SPECT sequences (1-2 s/projection, 60 projections, every 6°) were obtained for the first 8 min, followed by slower acquisitions (3-4 s/projection) during the rest of the study. Renal activity was measured in the total kidney volume by regions of interest drawn on consecutive transaxial slices of the third SPECT, which were then copied on the whole 12-SPECT series. Corresponding time-activity curves were created. DSPECT(AC) parameters were compared with those of planar renogram. The reference method for split renal function was 99m Tc-DMSA (geometrical mean of anterior and posterior projection counts) and for GFR the Cr-51 EDTA 2-blood sample clearance method. DSPECT(AC) images were of good quality. There was good correlation between renogram parameters (time to peak activity and NORA20) comparing the two techniques ( r = 0.959 and 0.933, respectively). In 21 cases with >30% absolute difference between the two kidneys, spilt renal function calculation by DSPECT(AC) correlated perfectly ( r = 0.968) with the reference method, whereas planar renogram was less accurate ( r = 0.843). Anatomic information provided by nonenhanced CT offered an integrated structural-functional view valuable for final diagnosis. DSPECT(AC) early kidney uptake as a fraction of injected dose correlated better with reference GFR ( r = 0.789) than the Gates' method ( r = 0.642). 99m Tc-DTPA dynamic SPECT/CT renogram is feasible with conventional SPECT/CT systems. It allows accurate split renal function measurement, offers additional anatomical information and can be used for closer approximation of GFR compared with Gates' method.

Performance of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equations Versus 99Tc-DTPA-Renogram in Assessing Kidney Function.

To evaluate the performance of measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations (MDRD186, MDRD175) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations, in comparison with technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99Tc-DTPA) renogram method, the gold standard. A related aim was to correlate the three equations to estimate GFR and their impact on reclassifying the stages of CKD in adult Omani patients. This cross-sectional study recruited two groups of patients diagnosed with CKD during a 10-month period from January to October 2021. The first group comprised 48 patients who underwent a 99Tc-DTPA renogram procedure for GFR measurement, and the second group comprised 30 348 adult patients who did not undergo the same procedure; estimated GFR was calculated using the three equations. The median of the reference GFR was 106.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, whereas the median estimated GFR for the MDRD175, MDRD186, and CKD-EPI equations were 92.5, 98.3, and 102.1, respectively. All three equations correlated moderately with the reference GFR (0.428, 0.428, 0.523, respectively; p < 0.010). The CKD-EPI showed lesser bias (3.7 vs. 12.9 and 7.5 for MDRD175 and MDRD186, respectively) and more accuracy (95.8% vs. 91.7% and 93.8%); however, it was the least precise (25.1 vs. 22.3 and 23.8). The MDRD186 performed similarly to the CKD-EPI equation at CKD stages 3a-5 and differed significantly at stages 1-2. Whereas the MDRD175 differed significantly with both equations at stages 1-3b and was similar to them at stages 4-5. The CKD-EPI equation had the highest accuracy and the least bias and precision in the general population. The MDRD186 CKD classification differed significantly from the CKD-EPI equation at CKD-stages 1-2 only. The CKD-EPI equation is preferred to MDRD for the detection and classification of early CKD stages.

Assessment of the 2023 European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equations in a Chinese adult population.

The European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) developed two novel equations in 2023 for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR): one sex-free cystatin C-based equation (EKFCCys) and one creatinine-cystatin C combined equation (EKFCCr-Cys). This study compared their performance with the previous creatinine-based EKFC equation (EKFCCr) and commonly used Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) equations in Chinese adults. A total of 2,438 Chinese adults (mean age=53.04 years) who underwent the 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging for reference GFR (rGFR) were included. Diagnostic value was evaluated using correlation coefficients, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC). Performance was assessed in terms of bias, precision (interquartile range of the median difference [IQR]), accuracy (percentage of estimates ±30 % of rGFR [P30], and root-mean-square error [RMSE]) across age, sex, and rGFR subgroups. Gender differences in bias and P30 were also analyzed. Average rGFR was 73.37 mL/min/1.73 m2. EKFC equations showed stronger correlations and larger AUCs compared to the parallel CKD-EPI equations, with EKFCCr-Cys demonstrating the greatest improvement (R=0.771, ROCAUC=0.913). Concerning bias, precision, and accuracy, EKFC equations consistently outperformed CKD-EPI equations. EKFCCr-Cys and EKFCCr performed acceptably well in the entire population and were equivalent to BIS equations in the elderly. All equations, including EKFCCys, showed similar P30 accuracy across sexes. EKFC equations provided a reasonable alternative for estimating GFR in the Chinese adult population. While EKFCCys did not outperform EKFCCr, EKFCCr-Cys improved the accuracy of single-marker equations.

Data mining of reference intervals for serum creatinine: an improvement in glomerular filtration rate estimating equations based on Q-values.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations based on rescaled serum creatinine (SCr/Q) have shown better performance, where Q represents the median SCr for age- and sex-specific healthy populations. However, there remains a scarcity of investigations in China to determine this value. We aimed to develop Chinese age- and sex-specific reference intervals (RIs) and Q-values for SCr and to validate the equations incorporating new Q-values. We included 117,345 adults from five centers for establishing RIs and Q-values, and 3,692 participants with reference GFR (rGFR, 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging measurement) for validation. Appropriate age partitioning was determined using the decision tree method. Lower and upper reference limits and medians were calculated using the refineR algorithm, and Q-values were determined accordingly. We evaluated the full age spectrum (FAS) and European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equations incorporating different Q-values considering bias, precision (interquartile range, IQR), and accuracy (percentage of estimates within ±20 % [P20] and ±30 % [P30] of rGFR). RIs for males were: 18-79 years, 55.53-92.50 μmol/L;≥80 years, 54.41-96.43 μmol/L. RIs for females were: 18-59 years, 40.42-69.73 μmol/L; 60-79 years, 41.16-73.69 μmol/L;≥80 years, 46.50-73.20 μmol/L. Q-values were set at 73.82 μmol/L (0.84 mg/dL) for males and 53.80 μmol/L (0.61 mg/dL) for females. After validation, we found that the adjusted equations exhibit less bias, improved precision and accuracy, and increased agreement of GFR categories. We determined Chinese age- and sex-specific RIs and Q-values for SCr. The adjustable Q-values provide an effective alternative to obtain valid equations for estimating GFR.

Validation of the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation in Chinese Adult Population: An Equation Standing on the Shoulders of Predecessors

Background: Equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) have been extensively applied to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but their performance is debatable. In 2021, the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) published one novel SCr-based formula, which combined the feature of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and full age spectrum (FAS) equations, but its potential applications remain unknown. We seek to assess the appropriateness of the three equations in Chinese adults. Methods: A total of 3,692 participants (median age, 54 years) were included. Reference GFR (rGFR) was measured by the 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated by the CKD-EPI, FAS, and EKFC equations. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were adopted to evaluate their validity. The performance was assessed in subgroups according to age, sex, rGFR, and SCr, considering the bias, accuracy, and precision. Results: The average rGFR was 74.2 mL/min/1.73 m². eGFR by EKFC showed a relatively stronger correlation with rGFR (R = 0.749) and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.902). EKFC was significantly less biased and exhibited the highest P30 in the entire population (bias = 3.61, P30 = 73.3%). It also performed well in all analyzed subgroups, especially in participants with normal or slightly impaired renal function (rGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and low SCr. Conclusions: Compared to the other two SCr-based formulas, EKFC performed better in the Chinese. Thus, it might serve as a good alternative, until a more suitable formula is developed for the Chinese population.

Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit

BackgroundThe 2018 BNMS Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) guidelines recommend a single-sample technique with the sampling time dictated by the expected renal function, but this is not known with any accuracy before the test. We aimed to assess whether the sampling regime suggested in the guidelines is optimal and determine the error in GFR result if the sample time is chosen incorrectly. We can then infer the degree of flexibility in the sampling regime.MethodsData from 6328 patients referred for GFR assessment at 6 different hospitals for a variety of indications were reviewed. The difference between the single-sample (Fleming) GFR result at each sample time and the slope–intercept GFR result at each hospital was calculated. A second dataset of 777 studies from one hospital with nine samples collected from 5 min to 8 h post-injection was analysed to provide a reference GFR to which the single-sample results were compared.ResultsRecommended single-sample times have been revised: for an expected GFR above 90 ml/min/1.73m2 a 2-h sample is recommended; between 50 and 90 ml/min/1.73m2 a 3-h sample is recommended; and between 30 and 50 ml/min/1.73m2 a 4-h sample is recommended. Root mean square error in single-sample GFR result compared with slope–intercept can be kept less than or equal to 3.30 ml/min/1.73m2 by following these recommendations.ConclusionThe results of this multisite study demonstrate a reassuringly wide range of sample times for an acceptably accurate single-sample GFR result. Modified recommended single-sample times have been proposed in line with the results, and a lookup table has been produced of rms errors across the full range of GFR results for the three sample times which can be used for error reporting of a mistimed sample.

51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance in children: One, two, or multiple samples?

Plasma disappearance curves using multiple blood samples are a recognized reference method for measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, there is no consensus on the protocol for this type of measurement. A two-compartment model is generally considered acceptable for the mathematical description of the concentration–time decay curve. The impact of the fitting procedure on the reported GFR has not been questioned.We defined 8 different fitting procedures to calculate the area under the curve, and from this area under the curve, the GFR. We applied the 8 fitting methods (all considering a full concentration–time curve) on the multiple sample data (8 samples) of 20 children diagnosed with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. We evaluated the effect (variability) on the reported GFR from the different fitting methods and compared these results with GFR-values calculated from late samples only (samples after 120 minutes) and from one-sample methods.In 6 out of 20 cases, the fitting methods on the full concentration–time curve resulted in very different reported GFR-values, mainly because some methods were not able to fit the data, or methods resulted in GFR-values ranging from 0 to 120 mL/min. The reported GFR-result therefore strongly depends on the fitting method, making the full concentration–time method less robust than expected. Compared with a consensus reference GFR, the late sample models did not show fitting issues and may therefore be considered as more robust. Also the one-sample methods showed acceptable accuracy.The late sample methods (using 3 time-points) provide robust and reliable methods to determine GFR.

Mathematical postprocessing analysis of contrast-enhanced computed tomography data of the kidneys in evaluation of split renal function in patients with kidney stone disease

Introduction. An original research work was performed to assess split kidney function by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with mathematical analysis of the kidneys computed tomography (CT) data in patients with kidney stone disease (KSD). Objective was to evaluate the GFR and the parenchyma structure of each kidney and identify the possible patterns of contrast medium intrarenal transport with mathematical analysis of the kidneys CT data in patients with KSD.Materials and methods. Data of 27 patients of both genders with KSD were retrospectively analyzed. To evaluate GFR separately for each kidney we analyzed the data of contrast-enhanced CT (GFR reference values are 0.55 % of contrast medium per second). Inclusion criteria are as follows: 1) newly diagnosed SKD; 2) stone size ≤1,5-2,0 cm, no obstruction of the urine flow registered; 3) no kidney or upper urinary tract surgical history; 4) age - ≤45 years; 5) no severe chronic diseases. All of these allowed to minimize influence of any other disorders on split renal function except for SKD and conduct per se research.Results. The mathematic analysis of the contrast-enhanced CT data revealed GFR changes in 26 (96.3 %) out of 27 patients. Hyperfiltration was found in 12 (44.4 %) patients: right kidney GFR - 0.6-0.77 %, mean value - 0.65 %; left kidney GFR - 0.59-0.79 %, mean value - 0.67 %. Hypofiltration was found in 13 (48.1 %) patients: right kidney GFR - 0.2-0.54 %, mean value - 0.37 %; left kidney GFR - 0.2-0.53 %, mean value - 0.4 %. The GFR values significantly differed between the groups both for the right (p = 0.000014) and left (p = 0.000045) kidneys. We found no significant age-related difference between the groups (p = 0.895). As well as that no significant differences in Resistance Index both in magistral (right kidney: p = 0.221; left kidney: p = 0.850) and segmental (right kidney: p = 0.306; left kidney: p = 0.957) arteries between the groups with hyperfiltration and hypofiltration were observed. One patient demonstrated no changes in GFR, and the other one had hyperfiltration (0,62 %) in one kidney and hypofiltration (0,48 %) in another.Conclusion. Most of the patients (92.6 %) with SKD demonstrate GFR changes (either hyperfiltration or hypofiltration) that may indicate the disturbed intrarenal blood and urine flow through the kidney.

Age-specific normal reference ranges for 99mTc-DTPA glomerular filtration rate to use with two-sample slope-intercept method and Jodal Brochner-Mortensen correction.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) varies with age, the calculation method, and the correction factor for slope-intercept overestimation. Hence, any normal reference range accompanying the results should be suitably adapted to the method used. For Nuclear Medicine Departments using a two-sample slope-intercept method, the lack of appropriate age-specific normal reference range has been a hindrance to adopting the recently updated Jodal Brochner-Mortensen (JBM) correction over other older and more widely used methods. A retrospective analysis of the routine GFR calculation and clinical reports generated locally from 2006 to 2020 was carried out. GFR was calculated with 99mTc-DTPA plasma clearance using a two-sample slope-intercept method with JBM correction. Age-specific normal range equations were developed from normal healthy subjects. Published normal reference ranges were modified with appropriate correction reversal and compared with the locally developed reference ranges. Age-specific normal GFR reference ranges for 99mTc-DTPA with slope-intercept method and JBM correction were developed and validated with current literature. Normal reference range (Mean ± 2SD) for Normalised GFR (ml min-1 (1.73m2)-1) within 95% confidence limits suitable for use with JBM correction is 100.6 ± 35.2 for children above 2years and 102.9 - 0.00629 × (Age)2 ± 19.4 for adults. Availability of age-specific normal GFR reference ranges applicable to the target population and appropriately tailored to the calculation method and correction factor enables Nuclear Medicine Departments to update their calculation methods in line with the current literature and also facilitates accurate reporting and evaluation of the calculated GFR results.

Is DtPa the Gold Standard for Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Voluntary Kidney Donors before and after Donor Nephrectomy?

Introduction: Precise assessment of renal function of voluntary kidney donors has important implications for both donor and recipient health outcome. The ideal test for assessment of overall renal function is measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR). Various centres use various creatinine based formulae to calculate the GFR, however when compared to GFR measurements by 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) isotope clearance, their performance remain inconclusive. Aim: To assess the efficacy of creatinine-based GFR estimating equations in comparison to DTPA scan in voluntary kidney donors before and after donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 50 voluntary kidney donors who underwent donor nephrectomy at Army Hospital (R&amp;R), New delhi. This study was conducted from November 2016 to March 2018 as a single centre, prospective, longitudinal cohort study on living related kidney donors with follow up at 1 and 3 months after kidney donation. The predictive capabilities of GFR estimation by Cockroft Gault (CG) equation, CG equation corrected for GFR and 24-hour urine Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) corrected for Body Surface Area (BSA), for both pre- and postdonor nephrectomy at 90 days, were assessed and further compared with DTPA-GFR as reference GFR. Individual quantitative parameters were compared using Student t test. For the normally distributed GFR data, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was also calculated. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 24.0, software and MS Excel were used for analysis. Results: Out of 50 subjects studied, 38 (76%) were females and 12 (24%) were males. Majority of donors were spouses. The mean GFR measured by 99mTc-DTPA scan was 99.47±14.4 ml/min/1.73m2 and 62.1±11.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 pre and postdonation respectively. All the equations being evaluated in this study underestimated the GFR as measured by 99mTc DTPA renal scan prior to kidney donation whereas GFR estimation postdonor nephrectomy by CG CrCl and CG GFR overestimated the GFR values while Urine CrCl underestimated it. Conclusion: All the equations performed unsatisfactorily. Even the best performing equation urine-CrCl was also found to be suboptimal for donor evaluation. More accurate methods of GFR estimation, should, thus be used keeping the potential risks of living kidney donation in perspective.

Assessment of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in kidney transplant recipients using Bayesian estimation of the iohexol clearance.

Background Plasma iohexol clearance (CLiohexol) is a reference technique for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determination. In routine practice, CLiohexol is calculated using one of several formulas, which have never been evaluated in kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to model iohexol pharmacokinetics in this population, evaluate the predictive performance of three simplified formulas and evaluate whether a Bayesian algorithm improves CLiohexol estimation. Methods After administration of iohexol, six blood samples were drawn from 151 patients at various time points. The dataset was split into two groups, one to develop the population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) model (n = 103) and the other (n = 48) to estimate the predictive performances of the various GFR estimation methods. GFR reference values (GFRref) in the validation dataset were obtained by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Predictive performances of each method were evaluated in terms of bias (ME), imprecision (root mean square error [RMSE]) and number of predictions out of the ±10% or 15% error interval around the GFRref. Results A two-compartment model best fitted the data. The Bayesian estimator with samples drawn at 30, 120 and 270 min allowed accurate prediction of GFRref (ME = 0.47%, RMSE = 3.42%), as did the Brøchner-Mortensen (BM) formula (ME = - 0.0425%, RMSE = 3.40%). With both methods, none of the CL estimates were outside the ±15% interval and only 2.4% were outside the ±10% for the BM formula (and none for the Bayesian estimator). In patients with GFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2, the BM formula performed very well, while the Bayesian method could not be evaluated in depth due to too small a number of patients with adequate sampling times. Conclusions GFR can be estimated with acceptable accuracy in kidney transplant patients using the BM formula, but also using a Bayesian algorithm.

Comparison between the Beta-2 Microglobulin-Based Equation and the CKD-EPI Equation for Estimating GFR in CKD Patients in China: ES-CKD Study

Background: Beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) and cystatin C are novel glomerular filtration markers that have a stronger association with adverse outcomes than creatinine. The B2M-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equation was built in 2016. Several new creatinine and cystatin C equations were developed in 2019 in China. However, external validation of these new equations remains to be seen. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. The equations were validated in a population totaling 830 participants (median age 62 years). These equations include the B2M-based equation (built in 2016), three CKD-EPI equations (built in 2009 and 2012), three Yang-Du equations (C-CKD-EPIscr, C-CKD-EPIcys, and C-CKD-EPIscr-cys equations, all of which were Chinese-modified CKD-EPI equations developed by Yang et al. in 2019), and a Xiangya equation (a creatinine-based equation built in the Third Xiangya Hospital in 2019). The estimated GFR (eGFR) calculated separately by 8 equations (B2M GFR, CKD-EPIscr, CKD-EPIcys, CKD-EPIscr-cys, C-CKD-EPIscr, C-CKD-EPIcys, C-CKD-EPIscr-cys, and Xiangya equations) was compared with the reference GFR (rGFR) measured by the ^99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. Participants were divided into CKD stage 1–5 specific subgroups. The primary outcomes of this study were bias, precision (interquartile range of difference, IQR), and accuracy (the proportion of eGFR within 30% of rGFR [P30] and root mean square error [RMSE]) of eGFR versus rGFR. Results: The B2M-based equation was worse than CKD-EPI equations and Yang-Du equations in most outcomes. CKD-EPIscr and C-CKD-EPIscr equations had a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC^AUC). The CKD-EPIscr equation had the highest sensitivity (83.3%) and the Xiangya equation the highest specificity (89.5%) to diagnose CKD. The bias was the lowest in CKD-EPIcys and C-CKD-EPIscr-cys equations by median and mean difference (1.23 and –1.42, respectively). The Xiangya equation yielded the highest bias by both median and mean difference (8.29 and 6.52, respectively). The C-CKD-EPIscr equation was the most accurate with the highest P30 value (68.1%) and most precise with the lowest IQR (19). The Xiangya equation had the best RMSE (lowest RMSE, 0.56), and gave the best performance in the CKD stage 2 subgroup. The C-CKD-EPIscr-cys equation achieved the lowest bias in CKD stage 3–5 (p = 0.663, 0.104, and 0.130, respectively, compared with rGFR). Conclusion: The B2M-based equation was worse than CKD-EPI and Yang-Du equations on the whole. CKD-EPIcys and C-CKD-EPIscr-cys equations had the lowest bias, whereas the Xiangya equation yielded the highest bias. The Xiangya equation gave the best performance in the CKD stage 2 subgroup, while the C-CKD-EPIscr-cys equation achieved the lowest bias in CKD stage 3–5. Further work to improve the performance of the GFR estimating equation is needed.

Agreement and Precision Analyses of Various Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Formulae in Cancer Patients

The accuracy of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in cancer patients is very important for dose adjustments of anti-malignancy drugs to reduce toxicities and enhance therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, the performance of eGFR equations, including their bias, precision, and accuracy, was explored in patients with varying stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) who needed anti-cancer drugs. The reference glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed by the 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) plasma clearance method in 320 patients and compared with the GFRs estimated by i) the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, ii) the unadjusted for body surface area (BSA) CKD-EPI equation, iii) the re-expressed Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation with the Thai racial factor, iv) the Thai eGFR equation, developed in CKD patients, v) the 2012 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C, vi) the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and vii) the Janowitz and Williams equations for cancer patients. The mean reference GFR was 60.5 ± 33.4 mL/min/1.73 m2. The bias (mean error) values for the estimated GFR from the CKD-EPI equation, BSA-unadjusted CKD-EPI equation, re-expressed MDRD study equation with the Thai racial factor, and Thai eGFR, 2012 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin-C, Cockcroft-Gault, and Janowitz and Williams equations were −2.68, 1.06, −7.70, −8.73, 13.37, 1.43, and 2.03 mL/min, respectively, the precision (standard deviation of bias) values were 6.89, 6.07, 14.02, 11.54, 20.85, 10.58, and 8.74 mL/min, respectively, and the accuracy (root-mean square error) values were 7.38, 6.15, 15.97, 14.16, 24.74, 10.66, and 8.96 mL/min, respectively. In conclusion, the estimated GFR from the BSA-unadjusted CKD-EPI equation demonstrated the least bias along with the highest precision and accuracy. Further studies on the outcomes of anti-cancer drug dose adjustments using this equation versus the current standard equation will be valuable.

The Accuracy of Renal Function Measurements in Obstructive Hydronephrosis Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Renography.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to assess the accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) evaluation in patients with obstructive hydronephrosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR renography (DCE-MRR). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A group of 28 adult volunteers were enrolled in this study: 13 without hydronephrosis, eight with low-grade hydronephrosis, and seven with high-grade hydronephrosis. The GFR obtained from DCE-MRR (GFRMRR) and the GFR obtained from renal scintigraphy (GFRRS) were compared with the reference GFR (GFRRef) acquired using the two plasma sample method. The correlation and agreement between GFRMRR and GFRRef, GFRRS and GFRRef, and single-kidney GFRMRR (skGFRMRR) and single-kidney GFRRS (skGFRRS) were assessed. The interrater reliability of DCE-MRR and the interrater reliability of renal scintigraphy (RS) were measured. RESULTS. Both GFRMRR and GFRRS correlated well with GFRRef. In patients with hydronephrosis, DCE-MRR and RS overestimated GFR by 12.8 ± 13.9 mL/min (mean ± SD) and 11.5 ± 12.3 mL/min, respectively. The skGFRRS was higher than skGFRMRR by 5.7 ± 3.8 mL/min in high-grade hydronephrotic kidneys (p = 0.004). Good interrater reliability was observed for skGFRMRR (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.82-0.92) and skGFRRS (ICC = 0.79-0.90) for both nonhydronephrotic kidneys and hydronephrotic kidneys. The overall mean SDs of repeated measurements from three investigators were 4.0 and 3.8 mL/min for skGFRMRR and skGFRRS, respectively. CONCLUSION. Both DCE-MRR and RS tend to overestimate GFR in patients with hydronephrosis. RS-derived skGFR is slightly higher than that of DCE-MRR in kidneys with high-grade hydronephrosis. DCE-MRR is comparable to RS and may serve as an alternative noninvasive method for GFR measurement.

Glomerular filtration rate evaluation and its comparison with international standard values in a large populationbased study

Introduction: The definition of the distance between the mean and reference value for the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been the topic of few performed studies, which resulting in an inconsistent mean difference. Objectives: This study was aimed to determine the normal GFR reference range for Iranian population and its comparison with global average. Patients and Methods: Data of the study population was extracted from Sina Health Record System (SinaEHR®). Based on the blood creatinine level, the GFR was calculated by Cockcroft– Gault formula. Using statistical analyses and independent t-test, GFR distribution was evaluated by the STATA software. Results: In this study the mean GFR in the Iranian population was estimated as 111.52 mL/ min/1.73m2 (CI: 111.30-111.73). When comparing results of this study with an international meta-analysis, it was revealed that before 45 years, the mean GFR in the Iranian population is higher than the standard mean value in the meta-analysis, whereas it is lower than the mentioned value after the age of 45 years. Moreover, the results demonstrated a significant difference in the mean GFR between men and women over 40 years of age (P<0.001). In those cases suffering from hypertension, hyperlipidemia or diabetes, the mean GFR was lower than healthy individuals (P<0.05), however, this difference was not significant for diabetic patients (P=0.580). Conclusion: The difference between our large population-based study and meta-analysis shows the need for more precise studies to better determine standard range of GFR in the Iranian population.

Revised Equations to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C in China

Aim: Our previous study demonstrated that the cystatin C-based chronic kidney disease (CKD)-EPI equation and combined by serum creatinine (CKD-EPIscr-cys) had better capability to accurately evaluate glomerular filtration rate in the CKD participants. Considering that the accuracy of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remains less ideally, it is essential to modify the equation by including the Chinese eGFR racial factor in order to improve its performance. Methods: Two prospective cohorts were enrolled in 2 medical centers. New equations were developed in 529 participants and validated in 313 participants. Reference glomerular filtration rate (rGFR) was taken by ^99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method (Gates method). The primary outcomes of this study were bias, precision (interquartile range of difference [IQR]), and accuracy (the proportion of eGFR within 30% of rGFR [P30] and root mean square error [RMSE]) of eGFR versus rGFR. Results: In a development data set, Chinese coefficients for CKD-EPIscr (C-CKD-EPIscr), CKD-EPIcys (C-CKD-EPIcys), and CKD-EPIscr-cys (C-CKD-EPIscr-cys) were 0.871, 0.879, and 0.891, respectively. In a validation data set, C-CKD-EPIcys was the most accurate with highest P30 value (62.3%), relative lowest IQR (15.45), and RMSE (0.80) among 6 equations, though the bias of C-CKD-EPIcys was not better than CKD-EPIcys. C-CKD-EPIscr and C-CKD-EPIscr-cys equations were improved in bias (p < 0.001), ­precision, and accuracy (p = 0.004 and <0.001 for P30) compared with CKD-EPIscr and CKD-EPIscr-cys. Conclusion: C-CKD-EPIcys was the most accurate with the highest P30 value, relative lowest IQR, and RMSE among 6 equations. C-CKD-EPIscr and C-CKD-EPIscr-cys equations were improved in bias, precision, and accuracy. Other external validation of these equations is needed.

Assessment of renal function before contrast media injection: right decisions based on inaccurate estimates.

Information on renal function required before specified radiological examinations with contrast agents is usually obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data. The aim of our study was to demonstrate discrepancy between poor prediction and good diagnostic accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by prediction equations. In 50 patients, reference GFR was measured as plasma clearance of 51-chromium labeled ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic-acid (51Cr-EDTA) and compared with GFR assayed by creatinine clearance (CC) and estimated by Cockcroft-Gault prediction equation (CG). For comparisons, CC and CG were considered as continuous, categorical, and binary variables. Accuracy of the reference GFR prediction was expressed in terms of prediction errors and diagnostic accuracy indices. As continuous variable, CG estimated individual values of GFR with large prediction error exceeding that of CC. As categorical variable, it classified the patient stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with medium diagnostic accuracy of 74% (CKD 3) and 62% (CKD 4). As binary variable, CG classified individual patient's GFR below 30 and 60ml/min/1.73m2 with good diagnostic accuracy of 80 and 94%, respectively. Performance of other prediction equations did not significantly differ from CG. Despite large variance and poor prediction accuracy of individual GFR estimates, most of them correctly classified individual patient's GFR below specified level. Results of prediction equations thus should be used and reported exclusively as binary variables, while numerical values of GFR, if required, should be measured by more accurate radionuclide or laboratory methods. • Radiological guidelines on contrast media require estimation of glomerular filtration rate to assess kidney function before specified contrast examinations. • Estimated glomerular filtration rate is obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data as predictors. • While numerical estimates of glomerular filtration rate are inaccurate (their prediction accuracy is poor), diagnostic accuracy of binary estimates (ability to classify patient's glomerular filtration rate below or above a specified level) is very good.

Accuracy of iohexol plasma clearance for GFR-determination: a comparison between single and dual sampling

BackgroundCurrent guidelines regarding plasma-sampling techniques for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determination are inconsistent. Single-sample methods are commonly believed not to be precise enough to meet clinical demands. The present study compared the agreement between single- and dual- plasma sampling methods with a three-point plasma clearance of iohexol.MethodsA total of 46 healthy volunteers and 124 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction received 5 ml iohexol (300 mgI/ml) i.v. and plasma samples were drawn at 2-, 3- and 4-h post-injection. Plasma-iodine concentrations were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).ResultsBias was similar among single-plasma sampling methods (SPSM) and dual-plasma sampling methods (DPSM). The best correlation was obtained from the 2- and 4-h DPSM (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC]: 0.9988) with none of the estimates differed by more than 30% from the reference GFR and only one (0.06%) estimate differed by more than 10% (P30, 100%; P10, 99.4%). SPSM using samples around 3- or 4-h demonstrated acceptable accuracy at a GFR level of ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2 (P30 = 100% and P10 > 75% for both measurements).Conclusion4-h SPSM is advantageous in clinical practice in subjects with GFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m2. For patients with an expected GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2, a prolonged sampling time is more reliable.