Reference Broth Microdilution Methods Research Articles

Combining deep learning and droplet microfluidics for rapid and label-free antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin

Efficient tools for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) are crucial for appropriate use of antibiotics, especially colistin, which is now often considered a last resort therapy with extremely drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we developed a rapid, easy and miniaturized colistin susceptibility assay based on microfluidics, which allows for culture and high-throughput analysis of bacterial samples. Specifically, a simple microfluidic platform that can easily be operated was designed to encapsulate bacteria in nanoliter droplets and perform a fast and automated bacterial growth detection in 2 h, using standardized samples. Direct bright-field imaging of compartmentalized samples proved to be a faster and more accurate detection method as compared to fluorescence-based analysis. A deep learning powered approach was implemented for the sensitive detection of the growth of several strains in droplets. The DropDeepL AST method (Droplet and Deep learning-based method for AST) developed here allowed the determination of the colistin susceptibility profiles of 21 fast-growing Enterobacterales (E. coli and K. pneumoniae), including clinical isolates with different resistance mechanisms, showing 100 % categorical agreement with the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method performed simultaneously. Direct AST of bacteria in urine samples on chip also provided accurate results in 2 h, without the need of complex sample preparation procedures. This method can easily be implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories, and has the potential to be adapted to a variety of antibiotics, especially for last-line antibiotics to optimize treatment of patients infected with multi-drug resistant strains.

Outcomes by Candida spp. in the ReSTORE Phase 3 trial of rezafungin versus caspofungin for candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis.

Rezafungin is a long-acting, intravenously administered echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis (IC). Non-inferiority of rezafungin vs caspofungin for the treatment of adults with candidemia and/or IC was demonstrated in the Phase 3 ReSTORE study based on the primary endpoints of day 14 global cure and 30-day all-cause mortality. Here, an analysis of ReSTORE data evaluating efficacy outcomes by baseline Candida species is described. Susceptibility testing was performed for Candida species using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference broth microdilution method. There were 93 patients in the modified intent-to-treat population who received rezafungin; 94 received caspofungin. Baseline Candida species distribution was similar in the two treatment groups; C. albicans (occurring in 41.9% and 42.6% of patients in the rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively), C. glabrata (25.8% and 26.6%), and C. tropicalis (21.5% and 18.1%) were the most common pathogens. Rates of global cure and mycological eradication at day 14 and day 30 all-cause mortality by Candida species were comparable in the rezafungin and caspofungin treatment groups and did not appear to be impacted by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for either rezafungin or caspofungin. Two patients had baseline isolates with non-susceptible MIC values (both in the rezafungin group: one non-susceptible to rezafungin and one to caspofungin, classified as intermediate); both were candidemia-only patients in whom rezafungin treatment was successful based on the day 30 all-cause mortality endpoint. This analysis of ReSTORE demonstrated the efficacy of rezafungin for candidemia and IC in patients infected with a variety of Candida species.

Resistance Profile, Terbinafine Resistance Screening and MALDI-TOF MS Identification of the Emerging Pathogen Trichophyton indotineae

The emerging pathogen Trichophyton indotineae, often resistant to terbinafine (TRB), is known to cause severe dermatophytoses such as tinea corporis and tinea cruris. In order to achieve successful treatment for these infections, insight in the resistance profile of T. indotineae strains and rapid, reliable identification is necessary. In this research, a screening medium was tested on T. indotineae strains (n = 20) as an indication tool of TRB resistance. The obtained results were confirmed by antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) for TRB following the in vitro broth microdilution reference method. Additionally, AST was performed for eight other antifungal drugs: fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, griseofulvin, ciclopirox olamine, naftifine and amorolfine. Forty-five percent of the strains were confirmed to be resistant to terbinafine. The TRB resistant strains showed elevated minimal inhibitory concentration values for naftifine and amorolfine as well. DNA sequencing of the squalene epoxidase-encoding gene showed that TRB resistance was a consequence of missense point mutations in this gene, which led to amino acid substitutions F397L or L393F. MALDI-TOF MS was used as a quick, accurate identification tool for T. indotineae, as it can be challenging to distinguish it from closely related species such as Trichophyton mentagrophytes or Trichophyton interdigitale using morphological characteristics. While MALDI-TOF MS could reliably identify ≥ 95% of the T. indotineae strains (depending on the spectral library), it could not be used to successfully distinguish TRB susceptible from TRB resistant strains.

Lessons learned from an external quality assurance program in applying CLSI interpretive criteria for reporting piperacillin/tazobactam susceptibility

We evaluated the performance of automated susceptibility testing for piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) MICs against the reference microbroth dilution method. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of PTZ against a clinical isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae was determined by reference broth micro-dilution method in 10 replicates which yielded a modal MIC of 16 mg/L (susceptible dose-dependent). Out of 434 laboratories who obtained MIC of 16 mg/L correctly, only 301 interpreted the result as susceptible dose dependent as per 2022 revised CLSI criteria. Educating the clinical laboratories in validating AST methods as per latest CLSI guidelines is of utmost important.

Antimicrobial photodynamic effect of the photosensitizer riboflavin, alone and in combination with colistin, against pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates

IntroductionDevelopment of multi-, extensively-, and pandrug-resistant (MDR, XDR, and PDR) strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains a major problem in medical care. The present study evaluated the effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as a monotherapy and in combination with colistin against P. aeruginosa isolates. MethodsTwo P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from patients with respiratory tract infections were examined in this study. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin was determined by the colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) and the reference broth microdilution (rBMD) methods. aPDT was performed using the photosensitizer (Ps) riboflavin at several concentrations and a light-emitting diode (LED) emitting blue light for different irradiation times with or without colistin at 1/2 × MIC concentration. ResultsBoth PA1 and PA2 isolates were identified as colistin-resistant P. aeruginosa with a MIC ≥4 μg/mL by the CBDE and MICs of 512 μg/mL and 256 μg/mL, respectively, by the rBMD. In aPDT, neither riboflavin nor LED light alone had antibacterial effects. The values of colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) in both isolates were significantly reduced by LED + Ps treatments in a time-dependent manner (LED irradiation time) and dose-dependent manner (Ps concentration). In comparison with control, treatment with Ps (50 μM) + LED (120 s) and Ps (100 μM) + LED (120 s) resulted in 0.27 log10 CFU/mL and 0.43 log10 CFU/mL reductions in PA1, and 0.28 log10 CFU/mL and 0.34 log10 CFU/mL reductions in PA2, respectively, (P < 0.01). The best results were obtained after the combination of aPDT followed by colistin, which increased bacterial reduction, resulting in a 0.41−0.7 log10 CFU/mL reduction for PA1 and 0.35−0.83 log10 CFU/mL reduction for PA2 (P = 0.001). Conclusions: This study suggests the potential implications of aPDT in combination with antibiotics, such as colistin for treatment of difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa infections.

Evaluation of different linezolid susceptibility testing methods and detection of linezolid resistance gene (cfr) in staphylococcal isolates

Linezolid is an effective oxazolidinone antibiotic against multi resistant Gram-positive organisms. Linezolid resistance is an emerging problem and some controversy exists about the reliability of different phenotypic methods of linezolid susceptibility testing. Fifty isolates each of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus haemolyticus were tested for linezolid susceptibility using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion, E-test, automated system VITEK2, Broth micro-dilution (reference method) and PCR for the cfr gene. Six resistant isolates were identified, three each in MRSA and S. haemolyticus, all carrying the cfr gene. E-test and VITEK2 were found to be more accurate than disc diffusion test.

2755. Activity of Aztreonam-avibactam and Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) Isolates Collected in a Six-year Period (2017–2022)

Abstract Background Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations and cefiderocol (FDC) have been recommended for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), but extensive comparisons of these agents are limited. We tested the activity of aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), imipenem-relebactam (IR), all BL/BLIs, and FDC against &amp;gt; 500 CRE isolates collected in US hospitals during a 6-year period (2017–2022). Methods A total of 54,576 Enterobacterales (ENT) isolates collected during 2017–2021 were susceptibility (S) tested by reference broth microdilution methods. CRE isolates displayed meropenem and/or imipenem MIC results at &amp;gt; 1 mg/L and were submitted to whole genome sequencing for analysis of resistance mechanisms. Results The CRE isolates (n=511; 0.9% overall) were mainly KPC producers without metallo-beta-lactamases (n=346; 67.7%). Genes encoding MBLs and OXA-48–like enzymes alone were detected among 50 and 12 isolates, respectively. Another 12 isolates carried genes encoding NMC-A and SME. ATM-AVI inhibited 98.4% of the CRE isolates when applying ATM breakpoints for comparison. FDC, CAZ-AVI, MEV, and IR inhibited 94.7%, 89.2%, 86.7%, and 81.9% of the CRE isolates, respectively. Against class A serine-carbapenemase–producing isolates without MBLs, ATM-AVI, CAZ-AVI, FDC, and MEV demonstrated activity &amp;gt; 98.6%. IR inhibited 92.7% of these isolates. Except for ATM-AVI and FDC, other BL/BLI had limited activity against MBLs, ranging from 2.0% S for IR to 16% for MEV against MBL isolates. ATM-AVI inhibited 98.0% of the MBL isolates while FDC inhibited 74.0%. ATM-AVI, CAZ-AVI, IR, FDC, and MEV inhibited 94.5%, 96.7%, 90.1%, 89.0%, and 87.9% of the carbapenemase-negative isolates (n=91), respectively. Among comparators, tigecycline was the most active, inhibiting 94.7% of the CRE isolates; 84.7% of these isolates displayed a colistin intermediate MIC value of ≤ 2 mg/L. Conclusion The new BL/BLIs and FDC displayed good activity against a large collection of CRE isolates that were mainly KPC producers from US hospitals. Against MBLs, ATM-AVI was the most active agent, followed by FDC. Disclosures Mariana Castanheira, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|CorMedix: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Joshua Maher, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Affinity Biosensors: Grant/Research Support|AimMax Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Alterity Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amicrobe, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Arietis Pharma: Grant/Research Support|Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Astrellas Pharma, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica AG: Grant/Research Support|Becton Dickinson And Company: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Boost Biomes: Grant/Research Support|Diamond V: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics plc: Grant/Research Support|Johnson &amp; Johnson: Grant/Research Support|Kaleido Biosciences, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|National Institutes of Health: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Roche Holding AG: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Summmit Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Zoetis Inc: Grant/Research Support Katie Simpson, BS, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support Cory Hubler, BS, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Helio S. Sader, MD, PhD, FIDSA, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support

865. Same Shift Susceptibility Testing of Cefepime-Taniborbactam and Cefiderocol Using The Selux Next-Generation Phenotyping System

Abstract Background Robust, efficient, and reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems are an integral component of effective antibiotic treatment. Multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria continue to emerge at alarming rates, requiring continuous innovation and development of new antibiotics. Among the new promising treatments for severe bacterial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria, Cefiderocol (FDC) and Cefepime-Taniborbactam (FTB) have emerged as two frontrunners. FDC is the only FDA-approved siderophore cephalosporin, and FTB pairs the fourth-generation cephalosporin Cefepime, with Taniborbactam, a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor. AST results are paramount when directing therapy for patients with MDR infections, yet there is an average 3-year delay between the approval of new antibiotics and 510k submissions for new agents on automated AST systems. This is typified by FDC, for which there are currently no FDA-cleared automated AST systems. Here we assess the accuracy of FDC and FTB AST results using the Selux Next-Generation Phenotyping System. Methods For both FTB and FDC susceptibility, AST was performed using the Selux AST system and compared to CLSI broth microdilution (BMD) reference method in either cation-adjusted Muller Hinton broth (CAMHB) or its Iron depleted counterpart (ID-CAMHB). FDC, was tested in ID-CAMHB across 44 total CDC AR-Bank carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa species. 34 CDC AR-Bank Strains predominantly resistant (30/34) to Cefepime were used to assess FTB. For FDC Essential Agreement (EA) and Categorical Agreement (CA) relative to ID-CAMHB were determined according to FDA breakpoints. FTB breakpoints were based on FDA breakpoints for Cefepime. For both agents, a comparison of BMD and the Selux system was accessed by EA and CA. Results The Selux AST system produced MICs to FDC with an average accuracy of 98% EA and 98% CA in ID-CAMHB (Table 1). In FTB, the Selux AST system produced MICs with an average accuracy of 94% EA and 100% CA in CAMHB (Table 2). Conclusion These data demonstrate the ability of the Selux NGP system to provide accurate results for FDC and FTB. This is the first known demonstration of an automated AST system for these important new drugs. Disclosures David Jimenez, B.S., Selux Diagnostics: Employee Kristin Baker, PhD, Selux Diagnostics: Employee Kelly Flentie, PhD, Selux Diagnostics: Employee Kristen Roberts, BS, Selux Diagnostics: Stocks/Bonds Gabriel Michaels, n/a, Selux Diagnostics: Employee Eric Stern, PhD, Selux Diagnostics: Board Member|Selux Diagnostics: Ownership Interest

In vitro manogepix susceptibility testing of South African Emergomyces africanus, Emergomyces pasteurianus, and Blastomyces emzantsi clinical isolates.

We performed in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of manogepix against the yeast phase of 78 Emergomyces africanus, 2 Emergomyces pasteurianus, and 5 Blastomyces emzantsi isolates using a reference broth microdilution method following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations. All three pathogens had low minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from <0.0005 to 0.008 mg/L. Manogepix should be investigated in animal models and potentially in future human clinical trials for endemic mycoses.

In-vitro Susceptibility Testing Methods for Ceftazidime-avibactam against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: Comparison with Reference Broth Microdilution Method.

β-lactam antibiotics, mainly cephalosporins, and carbapenems, have been the mainstay of treatment for infections caused by Enterobacterales. However, their role in treating clinical infections has become limited because of the increase in resistance. There is a need to have cost-effective and rapid methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for newer antibiotics like ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), which can be applied in routine clinical microbiology laboratories. With this aim, the present study was conducted to compare the disk diffusion and gradient diffusion, i.e., the E-test method with the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method for in-vitro testing of ceftazidime-avibactam against CRE. A total of 111 CRE isolates from various clinical samples were included. Conventional PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) was done for the detection of genes encoding carbapenemases and to see their expression, modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) along with EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM) was done. 42.3% (47/111) isolates were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam by the standard broth microdilution method; however, 45.9% (51/111) were resistant by both disk diffusion and E-test. In 5.4% of isolates (similar in both methods), microbroth dilution method results did not match with E-strip and disk diffusion. Very major errors (VME) by both disk diffusion and E-test were found in 2.1% (1/47), and major errors (ME) were found in 7.8% (5/64) isolates (similar isolates in both methods). The overall categorical agreement (CA) rate was 94.6% for both E-test and disk diffusion, and the essential agreement (EA) rate was 90.1% (100/111) for E-test. 98% (109/111) of CRE harbored carbapenemase genes either singly (30.3%) or in combination with others (69.7%). In conclusion, for CRE, E-test and the disk diffusion method for ceftazidimeavibactam depicted an acceptable performance as an alternative to the reference broth microdilution method.

Optimization of the EUCAST reference broth microdilution method for echinocandin susceptibility testing of Aspergillus fumigatus.

Because of the high inoculum (105 cfu/mL) used in the EUCAST susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp., determination of the minimal effective concentration (MEC) of echinocandins is challenging as the morphological differences are subtle. The MECs of 10 WT and 4 non-WT Aspergillus fumigatus isolates were determined with the EUCAST E.Def 9.4. Plates were inoculated with increasing inocula (102-105 cfu/mL) and after 24 and 48 h of incubation, MECs were determined macroscopically (magnifying mirror) and microscopically (inverted microscope) by two observers, spectrophotometrically (OD at 405 nm) and colorimetrically (absorbance at 450/630 nm after 2 h incubation with 400 mg/L XTT/6.25 μM menadione). The interobserver (between observers)/intermethod (compared with the microscopic method) essential agreement (EA, ±1 2-fold dilution) and categorical agreement (CA) were determined for each inoculum. Echinocandin-induced microscopic hyphal alterations or macroscopic changes in turbidity were subtle with a 105 cfu/mL inoculum compared with the lower inocula of 103 and 102 cfu/mL, where more distinct changes in turbidity and formation of characteristic rosettes were obvious at the MEC after 48 h. A 105 cfu/mL inoculum resulted in wider MEC distributions (3-6 dilutions) and lower interobserver EA (69%), macroscopic-microscopic EA (26%) and CA (71%) compared with a 103 cfu/mL inoculum (2-3 dilutions, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively). Spectrophotometric readings using a 103 cfu/mL inoculum showed good EA (57-93%) and excellent CA (86%-100%), while the XTT assay demonstrated excellent EA (93%) and CA (100%). A 48 h incubation using a 103 cfu/mL inoculum improved echinocandin MEC determination for A. fumigatus with the EUCAST method, while the colorimetric assay could allow automation.

Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp.

Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP®, Liofilchem and UMIC®, Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid-Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9-98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2-97.1] for ComASP® and UMIC®, respectively) and bias < 30% (-7.2% and -25.2% for ComASP® and UMIC®, respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n = 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm.

Evaluation of VITEK® 2 AST cards (AST-N376 and AST-N397) for susceptibility testing of challenging Gram negatives

Due to the increasing diffusion of MDR/XDR Gram-negatives it is necessary to offer reliable antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), which also include new drugs. Here we evaluated the performances of the VITEK®2 AST-N376 and the AST-N397 cards. A collection of 180 clinical Gram-negative bacteria, producing relevant resistance mechanisms, were tested using VITEK 2 and MERLIN, in parallel. Discrepancies between the 2 systems were solved by the reference broth microdilution method. The workflow timing of the VITEK®2 system was also assessed. Overall, the VITEK®2 cards proved to be reliable in determining AST for the molecules evaluated, even if compliance with ISO acceptance criteria for accuracy assessment was not reached for some combinations and showed a short hands-on time for panels preparation. In conclusion, VITEK®2 is a valid system that ensures accurate results for AST of the molecules evaluated in this study and speeds up the workflow in the laboratory of diagnostic microbiology.

Comparison of Disk Diffusion, E-Test, and Broth Microdilution Methods for Testing In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol in Acinetobacter baumannii.

The reference method for cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing is broth microdilution (BMD) with iron-depleted-Mueller-Hinton (ID-MH) medium, whereas breakpoints recommended for disk diffusion (DD) are based on MH-agar plates. We aimed to compare the performance of the commercial BMD tests ComASP (Liofilchem) and UMIC (Bruker), and DD and E-test using MH- and ID-MH-agar plates with the reference BMD method using 100 carbapenem-resistant-A. baumannii isolates. Standard BMD was performed according to the EUCAST guidelines; DD and E-test were carried out using two commercial MH-agar plates (BioMérieux and Liofilchem) and an in-house ID-MH-agar plate, while ComASP and UMIC were performed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. DD performed with the ID-MH-agar plates led to a higher categorical agreement (CA, 95.1%) with standard BMD and fewer categorization errors compared to the commercial MH-agar plates (CA BioMérieux 91.1%, Liofilchem 89.2%). E-test on ID-MH-agar plates exhibited a significantly higher essential agreement (EA, 75%) with standard BMD compared to the two MH-agar plates (EA BioMérieux 57%, Liofilchem 44%), and showed a higher performance in detecting high-level resistance than ComASP and UMIC (mean log2 difference with standard BMD for resistant isolates of 0.5, 2.83, and 2.08, respectively). In conclusion, DD and E-test on ID-MH-agar plates exhibit a higher diagnostic performance than on MH-agar plates and the commercial BMD methods. Therefore, we recommend using ID-MH-agar plates for cefiderocol susceptibility testing of A. baumannii.

Comparison of the Micronaut-AM System and the EUCAST Broth Microdilution Reference Method for MIC Determination of Four Antifungals against Aspergillus fumigatus.

The Antifungal Susceptibility Testing method of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST) is a reference technique for the determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of antifungals for Aspergillus fumigatus. However, it is time-consuming and requires expertise. Micronaut-AM (M-AM) is a fast, simple, time-saving, and ready-to-use new colorimetric method using an indicator (resazurin) to facilitate the visual reading. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of the M-AM system and compare it with the EUCAST broth microdilution reference method to determine the susceptibility of 77 A. fumigatus clinical strains to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Overall, the essential agreements within ±2 dilutions were 100%, 62%, 58%, and 30% and the categorical agreements were 100%, 97%, 91%, and 87% for amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, respectively. No categorical discrepancy was found for amphotericin B, but several categorical discordances were observed with azole antifungals. However, only 2 of the 16 azole-resistant strains confirmed by the cyp51A sequencing would have been misclassified by M-AM. The use of M-AM is probably suitable for the determination of the MICs of amphotericin B, but further evaluations are needed to confirm its usefulness for the determination of the MICs of azoles for A. fumigatus.

A Selective Culture Medium for Screening Cefiderocol Resistance in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Cefiderocol (FDC) is a siderophore cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity against many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Acquired resistance to FDC has been already reported among Gram-negative isolates, thus highlighting the need for rapid and accurate identification of such resistant pathogens, in order to control their spread. Therefore, the SuperFDC medium was developed to screen FDC-resistant Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. After testing several culture conditions, a selective medium was set up by supplementing an iron-depleted agar medium with 8 μg/mL of FDC and evaluated with a collection of 68 FDC-susceptible and 33 FDC-resistant Gram-negative isolates exhibiting a variety of β-lactam resistance mechanisms. The sensitivity and specificity of detection of this medium were evaluated at 97% and 100%, respectively. In comparison with the reference broth microdilution method, only 3% very major errors were found. In addition, excellent detection performances were obtained by testing spiked stools with a lower limit of detection ranging between 100 and 103 CFU/mL. The SuperFDC medium allows detection of FDC-resistant Gram-negative isolates regardless of their corresponding resistance mechanisms.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Canadian patients: the SAVE study, 2011-2020.

To assess the antimicrobial susceptibility of 14 138 invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected in Canada from 2011 to 2020. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI M07 broth microdilution reference method. MICs were interpreted using 2022 CLSI M100 breakpoints. In 2020, 90.1% and 98.6% of invasive pneumococci were penicillin-susceptible when MICs were interpreted using CLSI meningitis or oral and non-meningitis breakpoints, respectively; 96.9% (meningitis breakpoint) and 99.5% (non-meningitis breakpoint) of isolates were ceftriaxone-susceptible, and 99.9% were levofloxacin-susceptible. Numerically small, non-temporal, but statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in the annual percentage of isolates susceptible to four of the 13 agents tested was observed across the 10-year study: chloramphenicol (4.4% difference), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (3.9%), penicillin (non-meningitis breakpoint, 2.7%) and ceftriaxone (meningitis breakpoint, 2.7%; non-meningitis breakpoint, 1.2%). During the same period, annual differences in percent susceptible values for penicillin (meningitis and oral breakpoints) and all other agents did not achieve statistical significance. The percentage of isolates with an MDR phenotype (resistance to ≥3 antimicrobial classes) in 2011 and 2020 (8.5% and 9.4%) was not significantly different (P = 0.109), although there was a significant interim decrease observed between 2011 and 2015 (P < 0.001) followed by a significant increase between 2016 and 2020 (P < 0.001). Statistically significant associations were observed between resistance rates to most antimicrobial agents included in the MDR analysis (penicillin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and chloramphenicol) and patient age, specimen source, geographic location in Canada or concurrent resistance to penicillin or clarithromycin, but not biological sex of patients. Given the large isolate collection studied, statistical significance did not necessarily imply clinical or public health significance in some analyses. Invasive pneumococcal isolates collected in Canada from 2011 to 2020 generally exhibited consistent in vitro susceptibility to commonly tested antimicrobial agents.

Clinical application of Vitek-derived minimum inhibitory concentration values: Proof of concept study.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values are useful in guiding appropriate antimicrobial therapy however, routine provision and interpretation of MIC values to guide clinical decision-making is challenging. This proof of concept study aims to demonstrate the clinical utility and application of Vitek®-derived MIC values through categorisation of clinical isolates as wild type. A random selection of clinically relevant Gram negative isolates routinely tested on the Vitek® instrument were included. The Vitek® MIC values, for selected antimicrobials at the lowest calling range of that card, were compared to the broth microdilution reference method. The specified end-point was concordance between the two results if the reference MIC was less than or equal to the EUCAST-defined epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) for that drug-bug combination. A total of 525 isolates were included (468 Enterobacterales and 57 Pseudomonas aeruginosa), with an overall concordance rate of 96.4% (508/525). Correct ECOFF categorisation by the Vitek® was highest for ceftazidime and piperacillin (100%, n = 48 and n = 55, respectively) and lowest for cefepime (81.8%, n = 66). Vitek®-derived MIC values can be used to categorise organisms as wild-type if the MIC is reported at the card's lowest calling range (≤) as there is high likelihood that the MIC is at or below the ECOFF. This has important implications for antimicrobial management, assisting in choice of agent and in improving probability of target attainment for desired pharmacodynamic targets which can translate into improved clinical outcomes. Minimum inhibitory concentration data from an automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing instrument can be used to guide clinical decisions.

Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam activities against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales from United States Medical Centers (2018–2022)

A total of 35,360 Enterobacterales isolates were consecutively collected from 75 US medical centers in 2018–2022. Among these isolates, 2612 (7.4%) were categorized as multidrug-resistant (MDR). Isolates were susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) were screened for carbapenemase (CPE) genes by whole genome sequencing. The highest MDR rates was observed among Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.2%), followed by Raoultella spp. (10.9%) and Providencia stuartii (9.8%). Ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam were very active and showed identical susceptibility rates against MDR isolates (97.9%). Imipenem-relebactam (93.5% susceptible [S]) exhibited slightly lower susceptibility rates due to its limited activity against Morganellaceae family. The most active β-lactamase inhibitor combination (BLI) against CRE isolates (n = 310) was ceftazidime-avibactam (84.2%S), followed by meropenem-vaborbactam (81.9%S) and imipenem-relebactam (74.8%S). All 3 BLIs were very active against KPC producers and none were active against MBL producers. Ceftazidime-avibactam exhibited greater activity against OXA-48–type producers than meropenem-vaborbactam and imipenem-vaborbactam.

Comparison of Broth Microdilution, Disk Diffusion and Strip Test Methods for Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The aim of this study was to compare the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method with the Disk Diffusion (DD) test and strip test against a collection of 75 well-characterized Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical strains to assess cefiderocol (CFD) antimicrobial activity. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on KPC-Kp strains by Illumina iSeq100 platform. The Categorical Agreement (CA) between the BMD method and DD test was 92% (69/75) with a Major Error (ME) of 16.7% (6/36). Additionally, the CA between the BMD method and test strip was 90.7% (68/75) with a Very Major Error (VME) of 17.9% (7/39) and 82.7% (62/75) between the strip test and DD with a ME of 30.2%. KPC-Kp strains showing resistance to CFD were 27 out of 75 (36%) by three methods. Specifically, 51.9% (14/27) of KPC-Kp resistant to CFD harbored blaKPC-3, while 48.1% (13/27) harbored mutated blaKPC-3. Moreover, KPC-Kp strains carrying a mutated blaKPC-3 gene exhibited high MIC values (p value < 0.001) compared to wild-type blaKPC-3. In conclusion, the DD test resulted as a valid alternative to the BMD method to determine the in vitro susceptibility to CFD, while the strip test exhibited major limitations.