A chemostratigraphic evaluation based on major and trace elements (including the REE group), heavy minerals, and whole rock petrographic analysis is applied on 300 samples from the Tumaco-1-ST-P well located in the Tumaco forearc basin, Colombia. The aim of the study is to gain a better understanding of the provenance, tectonic, and paleoweathering conditions of the succession, which contains three formations (Tumaco, Tangareal del Mira, and Cascajal) ranging in age from the late Oligocene to late Pliocene.SiO2 has the highest concentration of all major elements (mean at 52%), followed by Al2O3 (mean at 14.6%), Fe2O3, MgO, and CaO are in the range of 3.2–5.3%, Na2O and K2O oscillate between 1 and 2%, and TiO2, P2O5, MnO, and Cr2O3 are <1%. Out of trace elements, Ba, Sr, V, Cr, Cu, Zn, Ni and Zr are the most abundant; their enrichment is probably due to the marine/deltaic depositional environment conditions. Th, Cs, and Nb have the highest concentrations of all trace elements. In general, concentrations of light rare earth elements are greater than high rare earth elements (LREE > HREE). Both positive and negative Eu anomalies are present in Tumaco and Tangareal del Mira formations, suggesting that rocks have two sources, mafic and felsic; the presence of both is consistent with petrographic and heavy mineral analyses.Paleoweathering indices, such as the chemical index of alteration (CIA), plagioclase index of alteration (PIA), and index of compositional variability (ICV) in the Tumaco-1-ST-P well suggest that the source of these rocks experienced initial stages of weathering compared with Post-Archean Average Australian Shale (PAAS) and Upper Continental Crust (UCC) values, indicating that the Tumaco formation samples have undergone major alteration. The clay mineral assemblage is dominated by the occurrence of illite and illite/smectite mixed layers; when coupled with the CIA index and the Al2O3-CaO-Na2O-K2O (ACNK) plot this indicates post-depositional K-enrichment. The distribution of Al2O3, TiO2, and Zr suggests a limited recycling effect.The presence of first cycle mafic-to-intermediate igneous detritus, together with felsic to intermediate igneous and metamorphic minerals, suggest that the Tumaco forearc basin detrital material was supplied by two locations. One location corresponds to the orogenic island arc system of the Western Cordillera, which is dominated by mafic and intermediate extrusive rocks (basalt and andesite). The other source, which is volumetrically less important, is the Central Cordillera, which comprises intrusive felsic rocks and metamorphic rocks (skarn, marble, and quartz-micaceous schist). This subsidiary source represents a continental arc setting and is observed mainly in the Tumaco Formation.
Read full abstract