Reduced Rescue Medication Use Research Articles

Effect of ensifentrine on dyspnea in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of the ENHANCE trials

ABSTRACT Background Dyspnea is a critical component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We report the effect of ensifentrine, a novel PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor, on dyspnea using pooled data from the Phase 3 ENHANCE-1/2 trials. Methods The pooled population (ensifentrine, n = 975; placebo, n = 574) included patients aged 40–80 years with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 30–70% predicted, mMRC Dyspnea Scale score ≥2, and a smoking history ≥10 pack-years. Patients taking dual LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy were excluded. Dyspnea measures included the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS), and rescue medication use. Results After 24 weeks, ensifentrine significantly improved TDI scores (least-squares mean difference, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64, 1.30; p < 0.001) and across all TDI subdomains. Ensifentrine-treated patients were more likely to be TDI responders at week 24 (p < 0.001), which was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Ensifentrine-treated patients had improved E-RS breathlessness subdomain scores (p = 0.053) and reduced rescue medication use (p = 0.002). Conclusion Ensifentrine produced clinically meaningful improvements in multiple dyspnea measures in patients with symptomatic, moderate-to-severe COPD. A limitation of this study was the exclusion of patients taking dual LAMA/LABA and LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy. Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers are ENHANCE-1: NCT04535986; ENHANCE-2: NCT04542057.

Celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal in patients with moderate-to-severe pain following bunionectomy with osteotomy: Secondary analyses by baseline pain intensity and use of rescue medication of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, factorial, active- and placebo-controlled trial.

In the randomized, phase 3, SUSA-301 trial, celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal (CTC) provided significantly greater analgesia compared with celecoxib, tramadol, or placebo in adults with acute, moderate-to-severe, postoperative pain. This post hoc, secondary analysis further evaluated the use of rescue medication and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Patients (N = 637) were randomized 2:2:2:1 to receive oral CTC 200 mg twice daily (BID; n = 184), tramadol 50 mg four times daily (QID; n = 183), celecoxib 100 mg BID (n = 181), or placebo QID (n = 89). Post hoc analyses were conducted on the use of rescue medications up to 4 and 48 h post-study drug dose, stratified by baseline pain intensity (moderate/severe), and on the incidence of TEAEs, stratified by rescue medication use. A significantly lower proportion of patients received any rescue medication within 4 h post-study dose with CTC (49.5%) versus tramadol (61.7%, p = 0.0178), celecoxib (65.2%, p = 0.0024), and placebo (75.3%, p = 0.0001); this was also seen for oxycodone use. Fewer patients in the CTC group received ≥3 doses of rescue medication compared with the other groups, irrespective of baseline pain intensity. In patients who did not receive opioid rescue medication, CTC was associated with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting TEAEs versus tramadol alone. In patients who received rescue oxycodone, the incidence of nausea was similar in the CTC and tramadol groups, and higher versus celecoxib and placebo. Celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal was associated with reduced rescue medication use and an acceptable tolerability profile compared with tramadol or celecoxib alone in adults with acute, moderate-to-severe, postoperative pain.

Extrafine single inhaler triple therapy effectiveness in COPD patients previously treated with multiple-inhaler triple therapy: the TRIWIN study.

The extrafine single inhaler triple therapy (efSITT) containing beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium 87/5/9 μg has proved to be efficacious in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in randomized control trials. TRIWIN study evaluated the effectiveness of efSITT delivering beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium 87/5/9 μg in COPD patients previously treated with multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) in a real-world study in Greece. Prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional study was conducted over 24 weeks. A total of 475 eligible patients had moderate-to-severe COPD, an indication for treatment with efSITT, and were symptomatic despite receiving MITT. COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, pulmonary function parameters, use of rescue medication, and adherence to inhaler use were recorded at baseline (Visit 1), 3 (Visit 2), and 6 months (Visit 3) after treatment. Mean CAT score decreased from 21.4 points at Visit 1, to 16.6 at Visit 2 and 15.1 at Visit 3 (p < 0.001 for all pair comparisons). At Visit 3, 79.8% of patients reached a CAT improvement exceeding minimal clinically important difference (⩾2), compared to baseline. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%pred.) increased from 55.4% at Visit 1 to 63.5% at the end of study period (p < 0.001), while mean forced vital capacity (%pred.) increased from 71.1% at Visit 1, to 76.7% at Visit 3 (p < 0.001). The mean Test of Adherence to Inhalers score increased from 42.5 to 45.3 and 46.3 points, for the three visits, respectively (p < 0.001 comparing Visits 1/2 and Visits 1/3; p = 0.006 comparing Visits 2/3). The percentage of patients showing good adherence rose from 33.7% at baseline to 58.3% at Visit 3. The percentage of patients using rescue medication during the last month dropped from 16.2% to 7.4% at the end of study period (p < 0.001). Pulmonary function parameters also improved. The TRIWIN results suggest that extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium is effective in improving health status, pulmonary function, and adherence and in reducing rescue medication use in COPD patients previously treated with MITT, in a real-world setting in Greece.

Effectiveness of Palmitoylethanolamide (Levagen+) Compared to a Placebo for Reducing Pain, Duration, and Medication Use during Migraines in Otherwise Healthy Participants-A Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Study.

Migraines are a common neurological disorder that generally affects young to middle-aged adults and females more than males. Various treatment options are available; however, these can cause undesirable side effects. Therefore, alternative treatments with minimal side effects are still being investigated. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is a signalling lipid known to have anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. Previous prophylactic research has reported PEA supplementation to decrease pain associated with migraines. Upon commencement of migraine symptoms, participants were supplemented with either 600 mg of PEA (Levagen+) or a placebo (maltodextrin). Once a dose was taken, participants recorded a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain every 30 min for 4 h or until the migraine resolved. If the migraine had not resolved 2 h post-dose, participants were instructed to take a second dose. Levagen+ supplementation resolved more headaches after 2- and 8 h, had a lower VAS for pain score at 1.5 and 4 h, and reduced rescue medication use significantly more than a placebo. No adverse events were reported in either group. Overall, PEA was safe and effective in reducing migraine pain, duration, and medication use in an otherwise healthy adult population.

Effect of Immunotherapy on Patients with Bronchial Asthma

Immunotherapy, also known as allergen-specific immunotherapy or desensitization, involves gradually increasing doses of specific allergens to induce immune tolerance and modify the allergic response. The therapy aims to alleviate symptoms, reduce medication usage, and potentially modify the underlying disease process. Several studies have investigated the effects of immunotherapy on asthma patients, providing insights into its clinical efficacy and safety. Research studies have shown positive outcomes of immunotherapy in bronchial asthma. A randomized controlled trial demonstrated significant improvements in asthma symptoms, decreased medication use, and reduced airway hyperresponsiveness in patients who received subcutaneous immunotherapy compared to the placebo group. Another study focusing on children showed improvements in lung function and reduced asthma exacerbations with sublingual immunotherapy. Long-term effects of immunotherapy were explored in a prospective cohort study on adults with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma. The study found sustained improvements in asthma control, reduced rescue medication use, and a de

Seizure Outcomes With Cannabidiol (CBD) in Pediatric Versus Adult Patients With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) and Dravet Syndrome (DS): Subgroup Analysis of BECOME, a Caregiver Survey (P14-1.006)

<h3>Objective:</h3> To characterize and quantify seizure-related outcomes in pediatric (&lt;18 years) versus adult (≥18 years) patients from the cross-sectional caregiver survey BECOME (BEhavior, COgnition, and More with Epidiolex^®). <h3>Background:</h3> A substantial proportion of caregivers reported improvements in seizure and nonseizure outcomes in the primary analysis of the survey. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> The US-based caregivers (N=498) of patients with LGS (80%) or DS (20%) who received ≥3 months of CBD treatment (Epidiolex^®, 100 mg/mL oral solution) compared the past month with the period before CBD initiation. The online survey included multiple-choice and rank-order questions; changes were rated using a symmetrical 5- and 7-point Likert scale (from worsening to improvement). <h3>Results:</h3> Mean (standard deviation) patient age: 16 (11) years; median (IQR) CBD dose: 14 mg/kg/d (8–19 mg/kg/d); median concomitant ASMs: 4. Most caregivers of pediatric (n=315) and adult (n=183) patients reported any improvement (possible, definite minor, or definite major) in seizure frequency (84% each) and severity (77% and 75%). Worsening in seizure frequency was reported by 7% and 5% of caregivers of pediatric and adult patients, respectively; 10% and 6% reported any worsening in seizure severity. Caregivers of pediatric and adult patients reported any decrease in the frequency of specific seizure type as follows: convulsive (72% each), drop (71% each), nonconvulsive/nondrop (66% and 69%), and night-time seizures (61% and 63%). Similar proportions of caregivers of pediatric and adult patients reported improvements in seizure-free days/week for ≥1 seizure type (65% and 70%) and seizure freedom in the past month (18% and 15%). Many respondents in both groups reported reductions in rescue medication use (57% each), emergency room visits (56% and 51%), hospitalizations (55% and 50%), and occurrence of seizure-related injuries (48% and 49%). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> A substantial proportion of caregivers of patients with LGS or DS, regardless of age, reported improvements in seizure-related outcomes with CBD treatment. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. Saurer has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Saurer has stock in Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Berg has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of COMBINEDBrain. Dr. Berg has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Neurocrin. Dr. Berg has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biomarin. The institution of Dr. Berg has received research support from FamilieSCN2A Foundation. Dr. Dixon-Salazar has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) Foundation. Dr. Dixon-Salazar has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Neuelis. Mrs. Meskis has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Dravet Syndrome Foundation. Ms. Danese has nothing to disclose. Dr. Le has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Greenwich Biosciences. Dr. Le has stock in Greenwich Biosciences. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for stoke therapeutics. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Encoded Therapeutics. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for GW Biosciences. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Zogenix. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Neurelis. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biomarin. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Taysha. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Cycle Pharma. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Stoke Therapeutics. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Zogenix. Dr. Perry has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for GW Biosciences.

S523 A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ANJ908, a Novel DGAT1 Inhibitor, in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

Introduction: Current treatment for chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is limited by: 1. Low magnitude of drug effect (increase of only ∼1-1.5 SBM per week) 2. Low overall response rate (typically < 20%) 3. Loss of efficacy within 3-6 months. Real-world experience where CIC patients often cycle through 2-4 pharmacotherapies shows the need for new medications with better efficacy. ANJ908 is a safe and well-tolerated diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) 1 inhibitor which increases bowel movement number and softens the stool in humans. We designed and conducted a phase 2 study of ANJ908 in CIC patients and present the data here for the first time. Methods: ANJ908C2102 was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ANJ908 in CIC patients. Patients meeting ROME IV diagnostic criteria for functional constipation (a.k.a. CIC) and had < 3 SBMs/week for prior the two weeks were eligible. Enrolled patients underwent a 2 week run-in period where all previous constipation treatment was stopped. After run-in, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 4 weeks of once daily treatment with placebo, ANJ908 at 20 or 40 mg. Bowel movement timing, stool details, and patient reported constipation symptoms were recorded in an eDiary. Patient safety labs and AEs were monitored throughout the study. Results: A total of 191 patients were randomized. Patients were 77.9% female, with a mean (SD) age and BMI of 42.2 (14.4) years and 23.2 (4.36) kg/m2, respectively. ANJ908 increased the mean (SE) placebo-subtracted number of SBM/week by +2.28 (0.75; p = 0.0027) and +3.10 (0.74; p < 0.0001) and CSBM/week by +1.53 (0.70; p = 0.03) and +1.81 (0.70; p = 0.01), respectively at week 4. ANJ908 improved stool consistency, provided constipation relief, decreased straining severity, and reduced rescue medication use. ANJ908 was safe and generally well tolerated. Mild diarrhea, nausea and vomiting were the most common AEs with a total of 7 (out of 64) patients in the ANJ908 20 mg group discontinuing treatment due to AEs. Conclusion: ANJ908 demonstrated increases in weekly SBMs and CSBMs to a magnitude greater than previous treatments. Furthermore, ANJ908 improved patient reported stool consistency and relief of constipation symptoms. The benefit-risk profile of ANJ908 justifies advancement into phase 3 clinical development to confirm its efficacy and safety. If this profile is confirmed, ANJ908 may become a treatment better able to address the unmet need in CIC patients.

Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Triple Therapy Compared with Other Therapies for the Treatment of COPD: A Network Meta-Analysis.

IntroductionRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing triple therapies (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS], long-acting β2-agonist [LABA], and long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA]) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are limited. This network meta-analysis (NMA) investigated the comparative efficacy of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus any triple (ICS/LABA/LAMA) combinations and dual therapies in patients with COPD.MethodsThis NMA was conducted on the basis of a systematic literature review (SLR), which identified RCTs in adults aged at least 40 years with COPD. The RCTs compared different ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations or an ICS/LABA/LAMA combination with any dual therapy (ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA). Outcomes of interest included forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), annualized rate of combined moderate and severe exacerbations, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and SGRQ responders, transition dyspnea index focal score, and rescue medication use (RMU). Analyses were conducted at 24 weeks (primary endpoint), and 12 and 52 weeks (if feasible).ResultsThe NMA was informed by five trials reporting FEV1 at 24 weeks. FF/UMEC/VI was statistically significantly more effective at increasing trough FEV1 (based on change from baseline) than all triple comparators in the network apart from UMEC + FF/VI. The NMA was informed by 17 trials reporting moderate or severe exacerbation endpoints. FF/UMEC/VI demonstrated statistically significant improvements in annualized rate of combined moderate or severe exacerbations versus single-inhaler budesonide/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FOR). At 24 weeks, the NMA was informed by five trials. FF/UMEC/VI showed statistically significant improvements in annualized rate of combined moderate or severe exacerbations versus UMEC + FF/VI and BUD/GLY/FOR. FF/UMEC/VI also demonstrated improvements in mean SGRQ score versus other triple therapy comparators at 24 weeks, and a significant reduction in RMU compared with BUD/GLY/FOR (160/18/9.6).ConclusionThe findings of this NMA suggest favorable efficacy with single-inhaler triple therapy comprising FF/UMEC/VI. Further analysis is required as additional evidence becomes available.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02231-0.

Extrafine Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol NEXThaler on Device Usability, Adherence, Asthma Control and Quality of Life. A Panhellenic Prospective, Non-Interventional Observational Study in Patients with Asthma-The NEXT-Step Study.

Background: The fixed combination of extrafine beclometasone dipropionate 100 μg/formoterol 6 μg (extrafine BDP/F) delivered by NEXThaler has proved to be effective in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma in terms of lung function, symptoms and asthma control. The aim of this study was to investigate the usability/satisfaction of NEXThaler and adherence to treatment in asthma patients not well controlled by low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Methods: This was a 6-month prospective, multicenter, open-label, observational study in 661 patients with asthma not well controlled by low-dose ICS according to the physician’s clinical assessment, which have received regular treatment with extrafine BDP/F NEXThaler. Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler (FSI), treatment adherence with self-reported Morisky scale, asthma control, lung function and QoL were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months after treatment with extrafine BDP/F. Results: The percentage of patients at least “fairly” satisfied with NEXThaler usability (FSI-10 score 40 to 50) was 96.3%. The mean FSI-10 total score was 46.8 ± 4.4 on Visit 2 and increased to 48.1 ± 3.3 on Visit 3 (p < 0.001). Approximately 67% of the patients reported “high adherence” on Visit 2, and 70% of them reported “high adherence” on Visit 3. The percentage of patients with ACQ-6-uncontrolled asthma decreased from 79.1% on Visit 1 to 22.3% on Visit 2 and further decreased to 6.7% on Visit 3. Significant improvements were also observed in the total AQLQ score, predicted FEV1% and reduction in rescue medication use. Conclusions: The NEXThaler device, delivering a combination of BDP/F, achieves satisfaction and high adherence in patients with asthma not well controlled with low-dose ICS. Asthma control, QoL, lung function and rescue medication use were improved in a Greek real-world setting.

Review of efficacy of ciclesonide for the treatment of asthma in children.

Background: Ciclesonide (CIC) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) approved for the maintenance treatment of asthma in patients ages ≥ 12 years. The prodrug aspect of CIC is associated with a safety profile that may make it ideal for children. Objective: The objective was to summarize efficacy results from the eight phase III, randomized, double-blind, controlled trials in children with asthma conducted during CIC clinical development. Methods: Four trials compared CIC 40, 80, or 160 µg/day with placebo. Two trials compared CIC 160 µg/day with fluticasone propionate 200 µg/day, one trial compared CIC 80 or 160 µg/day with fluticasone 200 µg/day, and one trial compared CIC 160 µg/day with budesonide 400 µg/day. Results: The primary end point was met by at least two CIC doses versus placebo in the trials in which the primary end point was the change from baseline in lung function outcome (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] % predicted or morning peak expiratory flow [PEF]). A trial that compared CIC with placebo did not meet the primary end point of superiority in time-to-first severe wheeze exacerbation or lack of improvement. The primary end point of noninferiority to the active control (fluticasone or budesonide) in the change from baseline in a lung function outcome (FEV1, morning PEF, evening PEF) was met with the CIC 160-µg dose in all active control trials. CIC generally demonstrated statistically significant improvements in forced expiratory flow at 25%-75% of forced vital capacity, asthma symptoms, rescue medication use, and asthma control when compared with placebo and noninferiority for these outcomes compared with fluticasone or budesonide. Conclusion: In children with asthma, once-daily CIC significantly improved large and small airway function, asthma symptoms, and asthma control, and reduced rescue medication use compared with placebo. CIC was comparable with other ICS used to treat asthma in children, which demonstrated its worth for the pediatric population.

Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol according to the degree of reversibility of airflow limitation at screening: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX trial

BackgroundIn patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the relationship between short-term bronchodilator reversibility and longer-term response to bronchodilators is unclear. Here, we investigated whether the efficacy of long-acting bronchodilators is associated with reversibility of airflow limitation in patients with COPD with a low exacerbation risk not receiving inhaled corticosteroids.MethodsThe double-blind, double-dummy EMAX trial randomised patients to umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 µg once daily, umeclidinium 62.5 µg once daily, or salmeterol 50 µg twice daily. Bronchodilator reversibility to salbutamol was measured once at screening and defined as an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 mL 10−30 min post salbutamol. Post hoc, fractional polynomial (FP) modelling was conducted using the degree of reversibility (mL) at screening as a continuous variable to investigate its relationship to mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 and self-administered computerised-Transition Dyspnoea Index (SAC-TDI) at Week 24, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms-COPD (E-RS) at Weeks 21–24, and rescue medication use (puffs/day) over Weeks 1–24. Analyses were conducted across the full range of reversibility (−850–896 mL); however, results are presented for the range −100–400 mL because there were few participants with values outside this range.ResultsThe mean (standard deviation) reversibility was 130 mL (156) and the median was 113 mL; 625/2425 (26%) patients were reversible. There was a trend towards greater improvements in trough FEV1, SAC-TDI, E-RS and rescue medication use with umeclidinium/vilanterol with higher reversibility. Improvements in trough FEV1 and reductions in rescue medication use were greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol compared with either monotherapy across the range of reversibility. Greater improvements in SAC-TDI and E-RS total scores were observed with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in the middle of the reversibility range.ConclusionsFP analyses suggest that patients with higher levels of reversibility have greater improvements in lung function and symptoms in response to bronchodilators. Improvements in lung function and rescue medication use were greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy across the full range of reversibility, suggesting that the dual bronchodilator umeclidinium/vilanterol may be an appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic COPD, regardless of their level of reversibility.

Benefits of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) on symptoms and quality of life in patients with COPD in the ETHOS trial

BackgroundWe report the long-term effects of triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) vs glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) and budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF) on symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 52 weeks in the Phase III ETHOS study of patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. MethodsETHOS was a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, parallel-group study in symptomatic patients with COPD who experienced ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. Patients received twice-daily BGF 320/18/9.6 μg, BGF 160/18/9.6 μg, GFF 18/9.6 μg, or BFF 320/9.6 μg, administered via a single Aerosphere inhaler, for 52 weeks. ResultsThe modified intent-to-treat population included 8509 patients (mean age 64.7 years; 59.7% male; mean COPD Assessment Test score, 19.6). BGF significantly reduced rescue medication use vs GFF and BFF (−0.53 puffs/day [p < 0.0001] and −0.35 puffs/day [p = 0.0002], respectively, with BGF 320 over 52 weeks). BGF 320 also significantly improved St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score over 24 and 52 weeks vs dual therapies, resulting in the greatest proportion of SGRQ responders vs dual therapies over 24 weeks (52.5% vs 42.5% [GFF] and 45.2% [BFF]) and 52 weeks (47.0% vs 37.8% [GFF] and 41.0% [BFF]). Similar results were observed with BGF 160.Benefits were also observed vs dual therapies in symptomatic endpoints including Transition Dyspnea Index focal score, EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool total scores and Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD total scores over 24 and 52 weeks. ConclusionsBGF triple therapy improved symptoms and HRQoL vs dual therapies over 24 and 52 weeks in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.

Efficacy of indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in current and ex-smokers: a pooled analysis of IGNITE trials.

Inhaled corticosteroids have proven to be less effective in asthmatic patients who smoke; however, there is limited information on the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid-containing regimens in COPD patients who continue smoking. We evaluate the differential efficacy of once-daily indacaterol/glycopyrronium 110/50 µg compared with twice-daily salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 µg in current smokers and ex-smokers with COPD.A pooled analysis of data from ILLUMINATE, LANTERN and FLAME studies was conducted to assess the efficacy of indacaterol/glycopyrronium compared with salmeterol/fluticasone in current smokers and ex-smokers with COPD. Efficacy was assessed in terms of improvements in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), transition dyspnoea index (TDI) focal score, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, reduced rescue medication use and exacerbation prevention at 26 weeks after the start of the therapy.In total, 1769 (38%) current smokers and 2848 (62%) ex-smokers were included. Patients treated with indacaterol/glycopyrronium experienced greater improvements in trough FEV1 versus salmeterol/fluticasone in both current and ex-smokers (least squares mean treatment difference, 105 mL and 78 mL, respectively). Improvements in TDI focal score, SGRQ total score and reduction in rescue medication use were also greater with indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in current and ex-smokers. Furthermore, indacaterol/glycopyrronium reduced all exacerbations (moderate/severe) compared with salmeterol/fluticasone, irrespective of smoking status. The difference in efficacy in favour of indacaterol/glycopyrronium was more prominent in current smokers in most cases.Indacaterol/glycopyrronium demonstrated greater efficacy versus salmeterol/fluticasone, and the differences were generally more prominent in current smokers suggesting smoking may reduce the effects of salmeterol/fluticasone.

Evaluation of Medication Adherence and Rescue Medication Use in Non-Exacerbating Patients with COPD Receiving Umeclidinium/Vilanterol or Budesonide/Formoterol as Initial Maintenance Therapy.

BackgroundAdherence to inhaled maintenance therapy is critical to managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), while increasing rescue medication usage may indicate worsening symptoms. This study evaluated adherence and rescue medication use in patients with COPD without a history of exacerbation who initiated combination therapy with budesonide/formoterol (B/F) or umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI).MethodsRetrospective observational study of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage with Part D enrollees who initiated UMEC/VI or B/F between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 (earliest fill defined as index date). Eligibility criteria included age ≥40 years, 12 months continuous enrollment pre- and post-index, ≥1 pre-index COPD diagnosis, no pre-index asthma diagnosis, COPD-related exacerbations, or medication fills containing inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting β2-agonists, or long-acting muscarinic antagonists. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance treatment groups on potential confounders. Medication adherence (primary endpoint) was evaluated by the proportion of days covered (PDC). Rescue medication use (secondary endpoint) was standardized to canister equivalents (1 metered dose inhaler [200 puffs] or ~100 nebulized doses of short-acting β2-agonist- and/or short-acting muscarinic agonist-containing medication).ResultsAfter IPTW, covariates were balanced between cohorts (UMEC/VI: N=4082; B/F: N=9529). UMEC/VI initiators had a significantly greater mean PDC (UMEC/VI: 0.47 [0.33]; B/F: 0.38 [0.30]; P<0.001) and significantly higher rates of adherence (PDC≥0.80) than B/F initiators (UMEC/VI: n=1004 [25%], B/F: n=1391 [15%]; relative risk: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.57, 1.81; P<0.001). In the year following initiation, UMEC/VI initiators filled significantly fewer rescue medication canister equivalents than B/F initiators (predicted mean [95% CI]: 1.78 [1.69, 1.88] vs 2.15 [2.08, 2.23]; mean difference [95% CI]: −0.37 [−0.50, −0.24]; P<0.001), corresponding to 17% less (estimated) rescue medication use (incidence rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.83 [0.78, 0.88]).ConclusionAmong non-exacerbating patients with COPD initiating dual therapy, UMEC/VI demonstrated improved adherence and reduced rescue medication use compared with B/F.

Glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler for maintenance-na\xefve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a post-hoc analysis of the randomized PINNACLE trials

BackgroundGlycopyrrolate (GP)/formoterol fumarate (FF; GFF) metered dose inhaler is a fixed-dose combination dual bronchodilator for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, whether the efficacy in patients without current maintenance treatment is consistent with currently maintenance-treated patients is unclear.MethodsData from patients who were not maintenance-treated at screening (NMT) (n = 1943) and patients who were maintenance-treated at screening (MT) patients (n = 3040) receiving GFF, FF, GP, or placebo were pooled from the Phase III PINNACLE studies (NCT01854645, NCT01854658, NCT02343458) for post-hoc analysis. MT patients had received long-acting bronchodilators and/or inhaled corticosteroids in the 30 days prior to screening, and/or prior to randomization. NMT patients had received short-acting bronchodilators or no treatment. Outcomes included forced expiratory volume over 1 s (FEV1), clinically important deterioration (CID), rescue medication use, and safety.ResultsGFF provided significant lung function improvements at Week 24 versus placebo, GP, and FF for NMT patients, with pre-dose trough FEV1 treatment differences of 152 (117–188) mL, 73 (45–100) mL, and 56 (29–84) mL, respectively (least squares mean change from baseline versus comparators [95% CI]; all P < 0.0001). GFF reduced the risk of CID by 17–43% in NMT (P ≤ 0.0157) and 18–52% (P ≤ 0.0012) in MT patients compared with monotherapy and placebo, and reduced rescue medication use by 1.5 puffs/day over 24 weeks for both cohorts. Safety profiles for all cohorts were consistent with each other and the parent studies.ConclusionsNMT patients achieved better lung function with GFF versus monotherapy and placebo, without increased safety risk. Dual bronchodilator therapy may offer better outcomes than monotherapy for COPD patients when administered as first-line treatment.

Budget Impact Of Eltrombopag As First-Line Treatment For Severe Aplastic Anemia In The United States.

BackgroundSevere aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare autoimmune condition resulting in low blood cell counts across lineages. Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has demonstrated low response, toxicity, and risk of transformation. In a Phase I/II trial, the addition of eltrombopag to first-line IST increased response rates relative to an IST-only historical cohort.MethodsA model was developed to estimate the budget impact of treating SAA with eltrombopag-based therapy from a US private healthcare system perspective. A simulated cohort of newly diagnosed SAA patients based on the total US population received 6 months of IST ± eltrombopag and were followed for 1 year, with mutually exclusive patient cohorts entering in years 1, 2, and 3. The model assessed the budget impact of first-year treatment for each cohort without considering subsequent years. At 6 months, responders in either arm received maintenance therapy (low-dose cyclosporine), and non-responders received 6 months of second-line eltrombopag monotherapy. Costs considered included first-line, maintenance, and second-line therapy, administration, routine care, mortality, and adverse events (AEs). All cost data were reported in 2018 US dollars.ResultsThe annual incidence of aplastic anemia was 0.000234%, with 83.8% of cases assumed to be SAA. Based on trial data, 94% of patients receiving eltrombopag and IST responded versus 66% of patients receiving IST, with a 0.3% reduction in the annual risk of mortality for the eltrombopag + IST group. Use of first-line eltrombopag in a model SAA population based on the total US population increased overall costs by $50 million over 3 years. First-line drug costs accounted for an increase of $69 million, while improved response produced $19 million in secondary therapy cost savings. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the analysis.ConclusionHigh response rates combined with reduced rescue medication use and mortality in patients treated with eltrombopag and IST mediated higher medication costs.

Rescue Analgesic Medication Use by Patients Treated with Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: Pooled Analysis of Three Phase 2/3 Randomized Clinical Trials.

IntroductionIn clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis (OAK), rescue medication is commonly provided to manage uncontrolled index-knee pain. The impact of treatment on rescue medication utilization provides important information on the robustness of analgesic effect. In randomized controlled OAK trials (NCT01487161, NCT02116972, NCT02357459), intra-articular (IA) triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) demonstrated substantial, prolonged analgesia versus saline-placebo and TA crystalline solution (TAcs) as assessed by patient-reported pain scales. This pooled analysis assessed the impact of TA-ER on rescue medication use.MethodsPatients (N = 798) with OAK (American College of Rheumatology criteria; Kellgren–Lawrence grade 2/3) and baseline average daily pain intensity score ≥ 5 to ≤ 9 (0–10 numeric rating scale) received a single IA injection of TA-ER (N = 324), saline-placebo (N = 262), or TAcs (N = 212). Acetaminophen/paracetamol tablets were provided to treat uncontrolled pain (knee or otherwise). Rescue medication consumption was monitored through a daily diary; pill counts were confirmed at the clinical site. Differences in rescue medication use were measured by least-squares mean (LSM) differences, number of rescue medication tablets used per day, and in area under the effect (AUE) curves of rescue medication tablets used per week.ResultsThe overall number of rescue medication tablets used per day through week 24 was significantly less (p ≤ 0.05) for TA-ER versus saline-placebo (LSM difference, − 0.43) and TAcs (− 0.24). Rescue medication use was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower following TA-ER versus saline-placebo across weeks 1–12 (AUEweeks1–12; LSM difference, − 24.5) and weeks 1–24 (AUEweeks1–24; − 51.6) and versus TAcs across weeks 1–12 (AUEweeks1–12; − 21.1).ConclusionsIn patients with painful OAK, reduced rescue medication use may be a potential benefit of TA-ER and further supports its analgesic efficacy. Additional research is needed to assess whether TA-ER impacts the use of other common oral analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids) for patients with OAK.FundingFlexion Therapeutics, Inc., Burlington, MA, USA.Plain Language SummaryPlain language summary available for this article.

A meta-analysis of anti-interleukin-13 monoclonal antibodies for uncontrolled asthma.

More and more clinical trials have tried to assess the clinical benefit of anti-interleukin (IL)-13 monoclonal antibodies for uncontrolled asthma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibodies for uncontrolled asthma. Major databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the anti-IL-13 treatment and a placebo in uncontrolled asthma. Outcomes, including asthma exacerbation rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores, rescue medication use, and adverse events were extracted from included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis. Five studies involving 3476 patients and two anti-IL-13 antibodies (lebrikizumab and tralokinumab) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to the placebo, anti-IL-13 treatments were associated with significant improvement in asthma exacerbation, FEV1 and AQLQ scores, and reduction in rescue medication use. Adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between two groups. Subgroup analysis showed patients with high periostin level had a lower risk of asthma exacerbation after receiving anti-IL-13 treatment. Our study suggests that anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibodies could improve the management of uncontrolled asthma. Periostin may be a good biomarker to detect the specific subgroup who could get better response to anti-IL-13 treatments. In view of blocking IL-13 alone is possibly not enough to achieve asthma control because of the overlapping pathophysiological roles of IL-13/IL-4 in inflammatory pathways, combined blocking of IL-13 and IL-4 with monoclonal antibodies may be more encouraging.

LANADELUMAB 300MG EVERY 2 WEEKS EFFECTIVELY PREVENTED HEREDITARY ANGIOEDEMA ATTACKS IN THE HELP STUDY

Introduction Lanadelumab, a highly specific, fully human monoclonal antibody targeting plasma kallikrein, demonstrated sustained and well-tolerated prophylaxis against hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in the phase 3 HELP Study (NCT02586805). Three dosing regimens were investigated; here we report further efficacy findings for lanadelumab 300mg every 2 weeks (q2wks). Methods Patients with HAE type I/II, aged ≥12 years, and with ≥1 attack/month at baseline were randomized 2:2:2:3 to lanadelumab 150mg every 4 weeks (q4wks), 300mg q4wks, 300mg q2wks, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the number of investigator-confirmed attacks over the 26-week treatment period (days 0–182). Exploratory analyses included efficacy and AE-QoL during treatment period and steady state (days 70–182; 16 weeks). Results Overall, 125 patients were treated, of which 27 received lanadelumab 300mg q2wks and 41 received placebo. Demographics and baseline characteristics for the lanadelumab 300mg q2wks group were comparable with the placebo group: mean (SD) age 40.3 (13.4) years, 55.6% female, 51.9% experienced ≥3 attacks/month. Compared with placebo, treatment with lanadelumab 300mg q2wks significantly reduced mean attack rate and resulted in greater proportions of attack-free patients during days 0–182 and days 70–182 (Table). Meaningful improvement in AE-QoL score was 7.2 times more likely with lanadelumab 300mg q2wks than with placebo. Table. Efficacy outcomes with lanadelumab 300mg q2wks versus placebo in the overall treatment period and the steady-state period Conclusions Treatment with lanadelumab 300mg q2wks provided significant, clinically meaningful benefits to HAE patients during the 26-week treatment period, and particularly during the steady-state period, with 91.5% attack reduction versus placebo, 76.9% attack-free (versus 2.7% with placebo), and 92.5% reduction in rescue medication use versus placebo.

Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium/Olodaterol in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Moderate Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis.

IntroductionAppropriate timing for dual bronchodilator therapy initiation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management is uncertain. Combination therapy is recommended as step-up from monotherapy or first-line treatment in patients with persistent symptoms. In this setting, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) demonstrated improved lung function and reduced rescue medication use over tiotropium/olodaterol (TIO/OLO). This subgroup analysis explored efficacy differences between these combinations in patients naïve to COPD maintenance therapy before study entry.MethodsPost hoc analysis of an 8-week, randomized, open-label, assessor-blind, two-period crossover study (204990; NCT02799784) comparing UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg and TIO/OLO 5/5 mcg, focused on maintenance-naïve (MN) patients with moderate COPD and persistent symptoms (modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score ≥ 2). Change from baseline (CFB) in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), percentage of FEV1 responders (CFB ≥ 100 ml), rescue medication use and safety were evaluated.ResultsThe MN population comprised 63% of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (148/236 patients) and had similar baseline demographics. At week 8, adjusted mean (standard error) improvements in trough FEV1 from baseline were clinically meaningful for both combinations (UMEC/VI: 167 [17] ml; TIO/OLO 110 [18] ml; adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 57 [23–92] ml; p = 0.001; %CFB: 11 vs. 8%). Proportion of FEV1 responders was greater with UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO at week 8 (60 vs. 42%; odds ratio [95% CI] 1.90 [1.12–3.22]; p = 0.018). Reduction in rescue medication use was 0.20 (95% CI 0.07–0.34) puffs/day greater with UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO over weeks 1–8 (p = 0.003). Adverse events incidence was similar (UMEC/VI: 24%; TIO/OLO: 29%).ConclusionsThese results highlight that the efficacy difference between UMEC/VI and TIO/OLO demonstrated in the ITT population is maintained in MN patients. Greater lung function improvements with UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO were accompanied by symptom improvements, as reflected in a significantly lower need for supplemental rescue medication.FundingGSK.Trial registrationNCT02799784