Reduction Of Femoral Fractures Research Articles

Comparison between in situ fixation and fixation after closed reduction in valgus impacted femoral neck fractures: A Multicenter Study.

The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between in situ fixation and fixation after closed reduction (CR) in patients aged 50 and above with valgus impacted femoral neck fractures using data from multiple centers. Design: Retrospective multicenter cohort study. Five tertiary-care university hospitals. Patients aged 50 and above, treated with operative fixation of valgus impacted femoral neck fractures using multiple cannulated screws from 2003 to 2019. Complications such as fixation failure, osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH), and reoperation were compared between the groups (in situ fixation group and fixation after CR group). Postoperative EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Koval's grade were compared. The mean age of the 206 patients (161 in situ fixation group, 45 in fixation after CR group) who met the inclusion criteria was 68.9 ± 10.9 years (range, 50 to 95 years). There were 39 men and 167 women. Fixation failure occurred in 11.2% (6.8% of in situ fixation group vs 26.7% of fixation after CR group, p = 0.002). Reoperation was required for 10.2% (7.5% of in situ fixation group vs 20% of fixation after CR group, p = 0.023). Fixation failure and reoperation rates were significantly higher in the fixation after CR group than in the in-situ fixation group (odds ratio = 4.757, p = 0.002 and odds ratio = 3.104, p = 0.023, respectively). At the two-year follow-up, ONFH occurred in 5.8% (9 out of 161, in situ fixation group vs 3 out of 45, fixation after CR group). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of ONFH between the two groups (p = 0.727). The Koval's grade at 6 and 12 months demonstrated better results in the in-situ group (p = 0.027, 0.044, respectively). Postoperative EQ-5D and HHS scores showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. In patients aged 50 years or older with valgus impacted femoral neck fractures, when fixation was done after reduction, the reoperation rate was higher due to fixation failure compared to in-situ fixation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ONFH in valgus impacted femoral neck fractures regardless of whether reduction was performed. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Closed Reduction Followed by Percutaneous Fixation of Acute Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNF) in young adults treated with a closed reduction technique because it pertains to reduction quality, rates of union, and risk factors for complication. METHODS: Design: Retrospective cohort study with radiograph and electronic medical record review. Setting: Level 1 Swiss Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: Between 2012 and 2021, young adults with isolated FNF (AO/OTA 31-B1) treated with percutaneous internal fixation were selected. Exclusion criteria were open reduction technique, age older than 65 years or younger than 16 years, pathologic fractures, and associated femoral head or shaft fractures. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Primary outcome was quality of reduction, as assessed by 3 experienced trauma surgeons' evaluation of intraoperative and/or first postoperative radiographs using the overall impression, the Garden alignment index, and Lowell criteria. In addition, clinical outcomes, conversion to arthroplasty, and complications after closed reduction and fixation of femoral neck fractures were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with a median interquartile range age of 57.5 (48–60) years were included. Among them, 22 (41%) were women and 32 (59%) were men. The closed reduction technique demonstrated satisfactory reduction results in up to 87% of cases. Major complications occurred in 19%, with 17% requiring conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Unacceptable or borderline acceptable reduction quality correlated significantly with the need for later conversion (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The study supported the use of the closed reduction technique for acute FNF in patients younger than 65 years, achieving satisfactory reduction results in up to 87% of cases with comparable complication rates to treatment of young femoral neck fractures with open reduction. Furthermore, it underscored the significance of the surgeon's overall impression of reduction quality, alongside the established reduction criteria, the Garden alignment index, and Lowell criteria, in evaluating the quality of the reduction. In addition, risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty was associated with worse closed reduction quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

New technology: clinical efficacy of intracapsular decompression and supported hollow screw treatment for Garden IV femoral neck fractures.

The management of Garden IV femoral neck fractures presents a formidable challenge. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a novel technological approach for treating Garden IV femoral neck fractures, involving intracapsular decompression and the utilization of supported hollow screws. Between October 2018 and October 2021, a cohort of 46 patients, comprising 25 males and 21 females, was admitted for Garden IV femoral neck fractures. The surgical intervention employed a novel methodology, involving closed reduction of femoral neck fractures on a traction bed and percutaneous implantation of decompression support hollow screw internal fixation in the capsule. Operative parameters such as intraoperative bleeding volume, incision length, and fluoroscopy frequency were recorded. Postoperative angiography was performed to evaluate the blood supply to the femoral neck and femoral head, while long-term follow-up records documented femoral neck fracture healing and patient functional recovery. The closed reduction and minimally invasive implantation of decompression support screws in the femoral neck capsule proved effective in successfully fixing Garden IV femoral neck fractures. The screw placement time was 20-45min, with an average of 25.2min. The number of fluoroscopy was 6-14, with an average of 7. The postoperative follow-up was 20-25months, with an average duration of 22months. All patients exhibited uneventful single-stage wound healing, devoid of complications such as nerve, blood vessel, or important tissue structure injuries. While femoral head necrosis occurred in one case and femoral neck shortening in another, all femoral neck fractures exhibited healing. Post-surgery, patients experienced rapid recovery, enabling early functional exercise with satisfactory functional restoration. The innovative technology, employing femoral neck capsule decompression support hollow screws, not only offers structural support, but also facilitates capsule decompression post-femoral neck fracture surgery. This approach promotes the restoration of blood flow to the femoral head and neck, accelerates fracture healing, diminishes the likelihood of femoral head necrosis, and enhances the overall therapeutic outcome for Garden IV femoral neck fractures. The merits of this novel technique warrant its widespread adoption and application.

Short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system combined with cannulated compression screw fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients

To investigate short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system (FNS) combined with cannulated compression screw (CCS) fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients. A clinical data of 49 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures, who met the selection criteria and admitted between January 2021 and June 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. After reduction of femoral neck fractures, 27 cases were treated with robot-guided FNS fixation (FNS group) and 22 cases with robot-guided FNS and CCS fixation (FNS+CCS group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, cause of fracture, time from fracture to operation, fracture side, and classification (Garden classification and Pauwels classification) between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, the time when the patient began bearing weight, and hip joint pain and functional scores (VAS score and Harris score) at last follow-up for two groups were recorded. Imaging re-examination was taken to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction, fracture healing, as well as the occurrence of fracture non-union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and femoral neck shortening. All operations were successfully completed and the incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05), and the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in FNS+CCS group significantly increased compared to FNS group ( P<0.05). All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.1 months). Imaging re-examination showed that there was no significant difference in fracture reduction quality between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the fracture healing time was significantly shorter in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group, and weight-bearing began earlier ( P<0.05). The incidences of femoral neck shortening, fracture non-union, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head were lower in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group, and there was significant difference in the incidence of femoral neck shortening between groups ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). However, the Harris score was significantly higher in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group ( P<0.05). Compared with FNS fixation alone, robot-guided FNS combined with CCS fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients has obvious advantages in terms of early weight bearing and fracture healing, improves fracture healing rate, effectively prevents postoperative complications, and can obtain good short-term effectiveness.

Dual-channel minimally invasive percutaneous cerclage for femoral shaft and metaphysis fractures during the internal fixation with intramedullary nails: case reports and technical description.

When treating femoral fractures with closed reduction intramedullary nail fixation, excessive residual displacement of the fracture end can affect the fixation effect and prolong the healing time, which is difficult to manage intraoperatively. This article introduces a simple steel wire cerclage fixation technique, which is percutaneous and can control the incision within 1 cm without excessive reliance on specially designed surgical instruments. It is suitable for the reduction and fixation of oblique femoral metaphysis fractures and butterfly-shaped femoral shaft fracture blocks.

Nonanatomical reduction of femoral neck fractures in young patients with different Pauwels classifications: a retrospective study and finite element analysis

BackgroundPrevious studies have reported that positive buttress is as effective as anatomical reduction in treating young femoral neck fractures, but whether this effect is related to the Pauwels classification remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical prognosis of positive buttress in young femoral neck fractures with different Pauwels classifications, as well as to assess its biomechanical properties.MethodsA total of 170 young patients with femoral neck fractures who were treated with three cannulated screws were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups based on their preoperative Pauwels classification. Each group was divided into three subgroups based on the reduction quality: positive buttress, negative buttress and anatomical reduction. The femoral neck shortening, the incidence of necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up were compared across the three reduction quality within each Pauwels classification. Subsequently, a volunteer was recruited, CT data of the hip was obtained, and finite element models representing different reduction quality under varying Pauwels classifications were established. The biomechanical properties of each model were then evaluated following the application of strains.ResultsIn Pauwels type I, there were no significant differences in postoperative femoral neck shortening, incidence of AVN, or Harris score among the three types of reduction quality (P > 0.05). However, positive buttress provided superior biomechanical stability compared to negative buttress and anatomical reduction. In Pauwels type II, the incidence of AVN was similar between the positive buttress and the anatomical reduction groups, and both were significantly lower than that in the negative buttress (P < 0.05). The Harris score of the positive buttress was higher than that of the negative buttress, and there was no significant difference in the occurrence of femoral neck shortening between the three groups (P > 0.05). Finite element analysis showed that the biomechanical stability of positive buttress was equivalent to anatomical reduction, and both were better than negative buttress. In Pauwels type III, the incidence of AVN in the anatomical reduction group was lower than that in both the positive buttress and negative buttress (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of AVN or femoral neck shortening between positive buttress and negative buttress (P > 0.05). There was also no difference in postoperative Harris scores between the three reduction qualities (P > 0.05). Both positive buttress and negative buttress exhibited identical biomechanical qualities and were inferior to anatomical reduction.ConclusionsThe biomechanical and clinical dominance of positive buttress correlates with Pauwels type. Specifically, Positive buttress is biomechanically stable in Pauwels types I and II. In Pauwels type III, positive buttress is not advantageous. As the Pauwels angle increases, the biomechanical benefit of the positive buttress is lost. Therefore, regardless of the Pauwels classification, negative buttress should be avoided after reduction of femoral neck fractures in young patients.

Precision reduction of femoral neck fractures: a novel strategy based on the femoral neck fracture morphology

In femoral neck fractures the secondary damage caused by repeated multiple reductions needs to be prevented. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to achieve an anatomical reduction in the first manipulation of reduction in femoral neck fractures. We propose a new reduction strategy using the x-ray morphology of femoral neck fractures for preoperative planning. In the present study we compared this approach to conventional operation procedures for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. From 2020 to 2021, 35 patients with femoral neck fractures were operated with this reduction strategy. Those were compared with 34 patients treated without the proposed preoperative method. All patients were compared for consistency between the preoperative assessment and the intraoperative execution of the reduction approach, number of reductions, operative time, number of fluoroscopies, intraoperative bleeding, and reduction quality. The operative time of patients in the study group was significantly shorter (38.40 ± 10.26 min) than that of the control group (47.26 ± 9.09 min), and the number of reductions [1.0 (1.0, 1.0)] was significantly less than that of the control group [2.0 (1.75, 2.25)]. The number of fluoroscopies (10.27 ± 2.84) was also significantly less than that of the control group (13.53 ± 2.59) times. The KAPPA value = 0.886 shows the good agreement between the preoperative proposed protocol and the intraoperative protocol about the study group .The bleeding, quality of repositioning, Harris Hip score, MOS 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), and early complication rate were not statistically different between the groups (P > 0.05). The selection of the appropriate repositioning method based on the analysis of femoral neck fracture X-ray morphology can improve the efficiency and accuracy of preoperative planning. This reduces the secondary damage that may be caused by multiple reduction, shortens the operation time and reduces the exposure to radiation.

Intertrochanteric femoral fracture with lateral wall fracture at the lag screw insertion site may cause postoperative anterior wall fracture and lead to deterioration in activities of daily living

BackgroundIncomplete reduction and fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures significantly affect patients' daily activities. The lateral wall's integrity is pivotal in such fractures. This study examines instability, particularly lateral wall fractures at the lag screw insertion site and postoperative anterior wall fractures. MethodsOverall, 161 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included. Three-dimensional computed tomography was conducted preoperatively and 3 weeks postoperatively to determine the postoperative anterior wall fractures incidence. Patient background, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative telescoping, and daily living activities were compared. ResultsThe study recorded 51 cases of lateral wall fractures at the lag screw insertion site and 17 of postoperative fractures of the anterior wall. Postoperative fractures of the anterior wall were found in 3 of 110 and 14 of 51 patients in the group without and with the lag screw insertion site, respectively. The group of postoperative fractures of the anterior wall had significantly lower bone mineral density, longer operative time, and increased intraoperative blood loss. At 4 weeks postoperatively, the group of postoperative fractures of the anterior wall showed increased telescoping and decreased motor component of the functional independence measure (with postoperative fractures of the anterior wall: 28, without postoperative fractures of the anterior wall: 30), and significant reductions were observed in the transfer and locomotion items, indicating lower limb function (with postoperative fractures of the anterior wall group: 11, without postoperative fractures of the anterior wall group: 12). ConclusionsPostoperative anterior wall fractures occurred in 27.5% cases with lateral wall fractures at the lag screw insertion site. Three-dimensional computed tomography is useful for preoperative evaluation of lateral wall fractures at the lag screw insertion site to assess instability. Postoperative fractures of the anterior wall related reduction in daily living activities needs attention.

Arthroscopic Reduction and Fixation of a Pipkin Type-I Femoral Head Fracture.

Arthroscopic Reduction and Fixation of a Pipkin Type-I Femoral Head Fracture.

ARTICULAR FEMORAL HEAD FRACTURE MANAGEMENT: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background: Femoral head fractures (FHFs) are relatively rare injuries usually caused by high-energy trauma. They typically occur after a posterior dislocation, and approximately 5 to 15 of posterior hip dislocations involve FHFs. FHFs may also occur simultaneously with acetabular fractures, with an estimated incidence of 29.2 In addition, the incidence of ipsilateral femoral head and neck fractures (iFHNF) is low. However, iFHNFs, as a special type of fracture, have the worst prognosis among all FHFs The aim: The aim of this study to show about articular femoral head fracture management. Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done. Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search get 17 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub get 489 articles, on Google Scholar 8050 articles. Records remove before screening are 5860, so we get 2696 articles fos screening. After we screened based on record exclude, we compiled a total of 12 papers. We included five research that met the criteria. Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation of femoral head fracture using surgical hip dislocation through Ganz approach is a viable treatment option and provides satisfactory results with low complication rates.

The significance of reduction of valgus-intercalated femoral neck fracture with valgus angle > 15°and the selection of internal fixation by finite element analysis

BackgroundCurrently, consensus is lacking on the necessity of internal fixation after reducing valgus-intercalated femoral neck fractures with abduction > 15°. This study employs finite element analysis to compare the biomechanical differences between the femoral neck dynamic cross nail system (FNS) and inverted cannulated screw (ICS), aiming to provide a foundation for clinical procedures.MethodsHuman femur CT scan data were processed using MimICS21.0 and Geomagic 2021 software, imported into Solidworks2021 to create fracture models, based on Garden I abduction and Valgus-intercalated femoral neck fractures. The internal fixation model was divided into two groups: A—Anatomic reduction group; B—Valgus-intercalated femoral neck fracture group. ANSYS software facilitated meshing, material assignment, and data calculation for stress and displacement comparisons when ICS and FNS were applied in reduction or non-reduction scenarios.ResultsWithout internal fixation, peak femur stress in both groups was 142.93 MPa and 183.62 MPa. Post FNS fixation, peak stress was 254.11 MPa and 424.81 MPa; peak stresses for the two FNS models were 141.26 MPa and 248.33 MPa. Maximum displacements for the two FNS groups were 1.91 mm and 1.26 mm, with peak fracture-end stress at 50.751 MPa and 124.47 MPa. After ICS fixation, femur peak stress was 204.76 MPa and 274.08 MPa; maximum displacements were 1.53 mm and 1.15 mm. ICS peak stress was 123.88 MPa and 174.61 MPa; maximum displacements were 1.17 mm and 1.09 mm, with peak fracture-end stress at 61.732 MPa and 104.02 MPa, respectively.ConclusionsOur finite element study indicates superior mechanical stability with internal fixation after reducing valgus-intercalated femoral neck fractures (> 15°) compared to in situ fixation. Additionally, ICS biomechanical properties are more suitable for this fracture type than FNS.

Stabilisation of femoral capital physeal fractures using transcervical pinning in cats: 19 cases (2014-2022).

To report the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in cats with femoral capital physeal fractures stabilised with transcervical pinning. Medical records of cats diagnosed with femoral capital physeal fractures and treated with transcervical pinning were reviewed. The collected data included signalment, weight, time from lameness to surgery, reported trauma, affected side, concomitant orthopaedic injuries, radiographs, osteoarthritis, femoral neck osteolysis, proximal femoral epiphysis to femoral neck ratio, fracture reduction, implants, complications and clinical evaluation results. An owner questionnaire was used for long-term follow-up. Nineteen cats with a total of 21 fractures met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen of the 19 cats showed no signs of lameness at the 1-month follow-up. Major and catastrophic complications occurred in 9.5% and 23.8% of the fractures, respectively. All catastrophic complications occurred in fractures with a high preoperative osteolysis grade (2 or 3). In our study, transcervical pinning was found to be a reliable fixation method for the treatment of femoral capital physeal fractures in cats with minimal preoperative femoral neck osteolysis. High rates of implant failure with loss of fracture reduction were observed in cats with high-grade preoperative osteolysis.

Comparison of effectiveness of lower extremity axial distractor and traction table assisted closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in femoral subtrochanteric fracture

To compare the effectiveness of lower extremity axial distractor (LEAD) and traction table assisted closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fracture. The clinical data of 117 patients with subtrochanteric fracture of femur treated by closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation between May 2012 and May 2022 who met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. According to the auxiliary reduction tools used during operation, the patients were divided into LEAD group (62 cases with LEAD reduction) and traction table group (55 cases with traction table reduction). There was no significant difference in baseline data, such as gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, fracture Seinsheimer classification, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, between the two groups ( P>0.05). Total incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, closed reduction rate, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time, weight-bearing activity time, and incidence of complications, as well as hip flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), Harris score, and VAS score at 1 month and 6 months after operation and last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups. There were 14 cases in the LEAD group from closed reduction to limited open reduction, and 43 cases in the traction table group. The incisions in the LEAD group healed by first intention, and no complication such as nerve and vascular injury occurred during operation. In the traction table group, 3 cases had perineal crush injury, which recovered spontaneously in 1 week. The total incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, and closed reduction rate in the LEAD group were significantly better than those in the traction table group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the quality of fracture reduction between the two groups ( P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-44 months, with an average of 15.8 months. In the LEAD group, 1 patient had delayed fracture union at 6 months after operation, 1 patient had nonunion at 3 years after operation, and 1 patient had incision sinus pus flow at 10 months after operation. In the traction table group, there was 1 patient with fracture nonunion at 15 months after operation. X-ray films of the other patients in the two groups showed that the internal fixator was fixed firmly without loosening and the fractures healed. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time, weight bearing activity time, incidence of complications, and postoperative hip flexion and extension ROM, Harris score, and VAS score at different time points between the two groups ( P>0.05). For femoral subtrochanteric fracture treated by close reduction and intramedullary nail fixation, compared with traction table, LEAD assisted fracture reduction can significantly shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy frequency, reduce incision length, effectively improve the success rate of closed reduction, and avoid complications related to traction table reduction. It provides a new method for good reduction of femoral subtrochanteric fracture.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Vancouver B1 and B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proportional Meta-Analysis.

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ORIF in patients with different fracture patterns (Vancouver B1 and B2). We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed from inception to August 2022. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the 10 comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the data from the 39 articles to determine a consensus. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis, irrigation/debridement and revision arthroplasty. The pair-wise meta-analysis showed similar outcomes between two groups; the risk of reoperation (odds ratio [OR]=0.82, confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.55, P=0.542), nonunion (OR=0.49; CI 0.22-1.10, P=0.085) and deep infection (OR=1.89, CI 0.48-7.46, P=0.361). In proportion meta-analysis, pooled prevalence of reoperation was 9% (95% CI, 6-12) in B1 and 8% (95% CI, 2-15) in B2 (heterogeneity between two groups (Q), P=0.772). The pooled prevalence of nonunion was same as of 4% in B1 and B2 (Q, P=0.678), and deep infection was 2% (95% CI, 1-3) in B1 and 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in B2 (Q, P=0.130). ORIF is a feasible treatment for B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, with acceptable outcomes in terms of, nonunion and infection. The results of this study would help clinicians and provide baseline data for further studies validating PFF.

Open reduction and internal fixation of irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture with femoral Neck System: a preliminary study

BackgroundMost displaced femoral neck fractures can achieve satisfactory anatomical reduction by closed reduction, but there are still some that cannot reset satisfactorily after closed reduction, and open reduction are required. Such fractures that cannot be repositioned successfully by closed reduction are called irreducible displaced femoral neck fractures in this study. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of direct anterior incision with the Femoral Neck System in the treatment of irreducible displaced femoral fractures.MethodsA total of 16 young and middle-aged patients with irreducible displaced femoral neck fractures involving Garden type III and IV were treated using Femoral Neck System fixation by open reduction through Direct Anterior Approach between January 2020 to September 2021. Functional outcomes and postoperative complications were assessed during follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Hip Harris score. The postoperative reduction was evaluated by the Garden Index. Observe postoperative complications.ResultsAll patients were followed up with a mean follow-up time of 21.1(12–30) months, and according to radiological results, all patients achieved fracture healing, with a mean healing time of 4.25 months. All 16 patients received grade Garden I and II reductions, and there was no significant difference in the anteroposterior Garden reduction index between the first day after surgery (166.13 ± 5.61) and the 12th month after surgery(164.94 ± 4.49) (P>0.05) and no significant difference in lateral Garden index between the first day after surgery(171.06 ± 4.46) and the 12th month after surgery(169.38 ± 3.98) (P<0.05). According to the Hip Harris score scale, 13 patients received excellent and 3 patients received good. The postoperative Hip Harris Score(17.19 ± 4.8) was significantly higher than the preoperative score(92.19 ± 3.4), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). No or mild femoral neck shortness occurred in 12 (75%) patients, moderate shortening occurred in 3 (18.75%) patients, and severe shortening occurred in 1 (6.25%) patient. None of the patients experienced femoral head necrosis, fracture nonunion, or incision infection. One patient developed deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity.ConclusionsThe Direct Anterior Approach combined with Femoral Neck System is an excellent treatment for irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture and achieved good functional outcomes and anatomical reduction with low complications.

Open Reduction of Pediatric Femur Fracture: A Technical Trick

Open Reduction of Pediatric Femur Fracture: A Technical Trick

Femoral neck system and cannulated compression screws in the treatment of non-anatomical reduction Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis

BackgroundHigh shear force is a major factor detrimental to the healing of vertical femoral neck fractures. In addition to firm fixation, reduction quality is crucial for postoperative stability. The present study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of the newly invented femoral neck system and three inverted-triangle cannulated compression screws treatments for non-anatomical reduction of Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures. MethodsA total of 18 non-anatomical reduction Pauwels type-III femoral neck fracture finite element models were fabricated and fixed using three inverted-triangle cannulated compression screws or the femoral neck system. A 1950-N force was applied to the femoral head to simulate the physiological load during a single-leg stance. Parameters of the maximum total deformation, the interfragmentary gap, and the maximum von Mises stress of the implants and the proximal femur were analyzed. FindingsThe results of the maximum total deformation, interfragmentary gap, and maximum von Mises stress of the implants in the negative-negative buttress model fixed by the femoral neck system were the largest among all groups (3.58 mm, 0.252 mm, and 729.68 MPa, respectively). In contrast, the anatomical-anatomical reduction model fixed by three inverted-triangle cannulated compression screws demonstrated the minimum total deformation, interfragmentary gap, and minimum von Mises stress of implants (1.107 mm, 0.09 mm, and 189.83 MPa, respectively). InterpretationAnatomical reduction or positive buttress in femoral neck fractures should be recommended during fracture reduction. The femoral neck system showed weaker biomechanical stability than three inverted-triangle cannulated compression screws in treating Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures.

Treatment of femoral neck fractures with closed reduction assisted by joystick technique and cannulated screw fixation

To investigate the effectiveness of joystick technique assisted closed reduction and cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Seventy-four patients with fresh femoral neck fractures who met the selection criteria between April 2017 and December 2018 were selected and divided into observation group (36 cases with closed reduction assisted by joystick technique) and control group (38 cases with closed manual reduction). There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture side, cause of injury, Garden classification, Pauwels classification, time from injury to operation, and complications (except for hypertension) between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative infusion volume, complications, and femoral neck shortening were recorded and compared between the two groups. Garden reduction index was used to evaluate the effect of fracture reduction, and score of fracture reduction (SFR) was designed and was used to evaluate the subtle reduction effect of joystick technique. The operation was successfully completed in both groups. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative infusion volume between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 17-38 months, with an average of 27.7 months. Two patients in the observation group received joint replacement due to failure of internal fixation during the follow-up, and the other patients had fracture healing. Within 1 week after operation, the Garden reduxtion index of the observation group was better than the control group; the SFR score of the observation group was also higher than that of the control group; the proportion of femoral neck shortening within 1 week after operation and at 1 year after operation in the observation group were lower than those in the control group. The differences of the above indexes between the two groups were significant ( P<0.05). The joystick technique can improve the effectiveness of closed reduction of femoral neck fractures and reduce the incidence of femoral neck shortening. The designed SFR score can directly and objectively evaluate the reduction effect of femoral neck fracture.

Nonanatomical reduction of femoral neck fractures in young patients treated with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study

PurposeNegative buttress reduction should be avoided in the treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) using conventional fixation. As the femoral neck system (FNS) has been recently developed and utilized widely to treat FNFs, the association of reduction quality with postoperative complications and clinical function has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of nonanatomical reduction in young patients with FNFs treated with FNS.MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 58 patients with FNFs treated with FNS between September 2019 and December 2021. According to the reduction quality immediately following surgery, patients were classified into positive, anatomical, and negative buttress reduction groups. Postoperative complications were assessed with 12 months of follow-up. The logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for postoperative complications. The postoperative hip function was assessed using the Harris hip scores (HHS) system.ResultsAt a follow-up of 12 months, a total of eight patients (8/58, 13.8%) had postoperative complications in three groups. Compared with the anatomical reduction group, negative buttress reduction was significantly associated with a higher complication rate (OR = 2.99, 95%CI 1.10–8.10, P = 0.03). No significant associations were found between positive buttress reduction and the incidence of postoperative complications (OR = 1.21, 95%CI 0.35–4.14, P = 0.76). The difference was not statistically significant in Harris hip scores.ConclusionNegative buttress reduction should be avoided in young patients with FNFs treated with FNS.

Review of closed reduction techniques for femoral neck fracture

For patients with femoral neck fractures who plan to undergo internal fixation, satisfied alignment of fracture ends is an important prerequisite for internal fixation stability and fracture healing. There are many reports on the reduction methods of displaced femoral neck fractures, which can be summarized into three categories:First, the solely longitudinal traction of lower limbs, supplemented by other manipulations such as rotation and compression; Second, the resultant force formed by the longitudinal traction of lower limbs and the lateral traction;the third is accomplished by vertical traction in the axis of femur with hip joint flexed. Each reduction method has its own advantages, but no single method can be applied to all fracture displacement. In this paper, some classical reduction techniques in the literatures are briefly reviewed. It is hoped that clinicians will not be limited to a certain reduction method, they should analyze the injury mechanism and fracture displacement process according to the morphology features and flexibly select targeted reduction methods to improve the success rate of closed reduction of femoral neck fracture.