Reduction Of Acetabular Fractures Research Articles

Acetabular fractures in geriatric patients: epidemiology, pathomechanism, classification and treatment options.

The incidence of geriatric acetabular fractures has shown a sharp increase in the last decades. The majority of patients are male, which is different to other osteoporotic fractures. The typical pathomechanism generally differs from acetabular fractures in young patients regarding both the direction and the amount of force transmission to the acetabulum via the femoral head. Geriatric fractures very frequently involve anterior structures of the acetabulum, while the posterior wall is less frequently involved. The anterior column and posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fracture is the most common fracture type. Superomedial dome impactions (gull sign) are a frequent feature in geriatric acetabular fractures as well. Treatment options include nonoperative treatment, internal fixation and arthoplasty. Nonoperative treatment includes rapid mobilisation and full weighbearing under analgesia and is advisable in non- or minimally displaced fractures without subluxation of the hip joint and without positive gull sign. Open reduction and internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures leads to good or excellent results, if anatomic reduction is achieved intraoperatively and loss of reduction does not occur postoperatively. Primary arthroplasty of geriatric acetabular fractures is a treatment option, which does not require anatomic reduction, allows for immediate postoperative full weightbearing and obviates several complications, which are associated with internal fixation. The major issue is the fixation of the acetabular cup in the fractured bone. Primary cups, reinforcement rings or a combination of arthroplasty and internal fixation may be applied depending on the acetabular fracture type.

Similar Medium-Term Revision Rates Following Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly.

The management of elderly acetabular fractures is complex, with high rates of conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), but potentially higher rates of complications after acute THA. The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database was queried between 2010 and 2017 for all patients aged 60 years or older who sustained a closed, isolated acetabular fracture and underwent ORIF, THA, or a combination. Chi-square tests and Student t tests were used to identify demographic differences between groups. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate predictors of 30-day readmission and 90-day complications. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the revision surgery-free survival (revision-free survival [RFS]), with revision surgery defined as conversion THA, revision ORIF, or revision THA. A total of 2,184 surgically managed acetabular fractures in elderly patients were identified, with 1,637 (75.0%) undergoing ORIF and 547 (25.0%) undergoing THA with or without ORIF. Median follow-up was 295 days (interquartile range, 13 to 1720 days). 99.4% of revisions following ORIF were for conversion arthroplasty. Unadjusted KM analysis showed no difference in RFS between ORIF and THA (log-rank test P = 0.27). RFS for ORIF patients was 95.1%, 85.8%, 78.3%, and 71.4% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. RFS for THA patients was 91.6%, 88.9%, 87.2%, and 78.8% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. Roughly 50% of revisions occurred within the first year postoperatively (49% for ORIF, 52% for THA). In propensity score-matched analysis, there was no difference between RFS on KM analysis (P = 0.22). No difference was observed in medium-term RFS between acute THA and ORIF for elderly acetabular fractures in California. Revision surgeries for either conversion or revision THA were relatively common in both groups, with roughly half of all revisions occurring within the first year postoperatively. III.

Progress on treatment of acetabular quadrilateral plate injury

Acetabular quadrilateral plate injury has become a hot spot and focus in the field of orthopaedic trauma and pelvic floor function in recent years. Although there are five fracture types,they are all based on fracture morphology,without considering the pulling force of ligaments,joint capsular and muscles. A perfect classification needs to describe the displacement of bone mass in three-dimensional space to better guide reduction and fixation. The seven incision and exposure methods are still the traditional open-eye surgery,and how to protect the criss-crossing vascular neural network and pelvic organs is still the focus. Quadrilateral defect causes dislocation of artificial hip joint,and quantitative evaluation of quadrilateral defect volume and revision techniques are still a hot topic. In this paper,the viewpoints of three-dimensional network structure of acetabular pelvic vascular anatomy,anatomical surgical target channel and fixation anchor point of acetabular fracture reduction are proposed to design new techniques for accurate and minimally invasive surgical operations,in order to realize the requirements of rapid orthopedic rehabilitation.

Acetabular Fracture Outcomes and Complications: An International Comparison.

Despite the groundbreaking research by Judet and Letournel in the 1960s, the specific equipment, surgical approach, fixation strategy, and post-operative course for treating acetabular fractures have not been standardized. Therefore, this study aimed to compare technological resources, operative procedures, and post-operative complications between patients treated for acetabular fractures in Romania and the United States (U.S.). Between February 2011 and August 2018, a total of 116 Romanian patients and 373 U.S. patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures. Data were collected prospectively for Romania and retrospectively for the U.S. The authors used T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and odds ratios to analyze categorical data while ordinal date were assessed using logistic regression. U.S. patients had higher comorbidity rates for diabetes, obesity, and hypertension. However, the initial quality of reduction, graded with Matta's criteria, was similar between American and Romanian patients. Post-operatively, U.S. patients had significantly higher Brooker criteria scores for heterotopic ossification. Rates of deep vein thrombosis, infections, sciatic nerve lesions, and loss of reduction between the two countries were not significantly different. Given the similar initial reduction quality despite technological differences, the authors suggest that fundamental factors, such as surgeon training and experience, may have a greater impact than the availability of technologically advanced operative resources. Future research focusing on the efficacy of these advanced resources for acetabular fracture fixation could help determine their true impact on patient outcomes and improve the cost-effectiveness of this surgery.

Comparison of patient demographics and patient-specific risk factors for readmissions following open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures.

Acetabular fractures are highly complex injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. The gold standard treatment for these injuries has become open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of this study is to further this understanding and investigate how (1) patient demographics and (2) patient-specific risk factors affect 90-day readmission rates. A retrospective, nationwide query of private insurance database from January 1st, 2010 to October 31st, 2020 was performed using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes. Patients who underwent acetabular ORIF and were readmitted within 90days following index procedure were included, patients who were not readmitted served as controls. Patients were divided by demographics and specific risk factors associated with readmission. The query yielded a total of 3942 patients. Age and sex were found to be non-significant contributing risk factors to 90-day readmissions. Data also showed that statistically significant comorbidities included arrhythmia, cerebrovascular disease, coagulopathy, fluid and electrolyte abnormalities, and pathologic weight loss. This study illustrated how several patient-specific risk factors may contribute to increased 90-day readmission risk following acetabular ORIF. A heightened awareness of these comorbidities in patients requiring acetabular ORIF is required to improve patient outcomes and minimize rates of readmission. Further investigation is needed to improve patient outcomes, and increase awareness of potential post-operative complications in these higher-risk patient populations.

Comparison of Modified Stoppa Approach versus Ilioinguinal Approach for Anterior Acetabular Fractures

Achieving an anatomically precise reduction of acetabular fractures is vital for obtaining the best possible outcome. The Modified Stoppa approach has demonstrated advantages such as reduced blood loss and shorter surgical durations when dealing with anterior acetabular fractures in comparison to the ilioinguinal approach. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of the modified Stoppa approach in comparison to the ilioinguinal approach. Methods: The quasi-experimental study was conducted within the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Jinnah Hospital during the period from November 12, 2018, to May 11, 2019.The study involved 60 patients, with 30 individuals in each group. Group A underwent treatment for anterior acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa method, while Group B received treatment using the ilioinguinal approach. Results: Patients ranged between 16-60 years of age with mean age of 36.9±11.2 in group-A and 35.6±10.3 year in group-B. Majority of the patients were male in both groups. Left anatomical side was involved in most of the patients in both groups. The mean duration of injury in group-A was 7.07±2.6, while in group-B, it was 6.6±2.4. A statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean operative time and blood loss (p<0.001). Furthermore, stratification was performed based on age, gender, and the duration of injury, and significant differences were observed in these stratified subgroups as well. Conclusions: Our findings showed that modified Stoppa technique outperforms the ilioinguinal method by exhibiting reduced blood loss and shorter operative durations. This positions the modified Stoppa technique as a superior option for addressing anterior acetabular fractures.

A technique for introducing broad-spectrum topical antibiotics during open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures.

Postoperative surgical site infections remain a significant and prevalent complication after open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures. Local antibiotics have been shown to decrease risk of postoperative infection, although recent evidence is conflicting. We provide a consistent and replicable technique for delivering intraoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics in the form of a putty applied directly to surgical implants. With this technique, systemic levels of those antibiotics remain safe and stable.

Use of 3D Fluoroscopy to Assist in the Reduction and Fixation of Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: A Safety and Quality Case Series.

Multidimensional fluoroscopy has been increasingly used in orthopaedic trauma to improve the intraoperative assessment of articular reductions and implant placement. Owing to the complex osteology of the pelvis, cross-sectional imaging is imperative for accurate evaluation of pelvic ring and acetabular injuries both preoperatively and intraoperatively. The continued development of fluoroscopic technology over the past decade has resulted in improved ease of intraoperative multidimensional fluoroscopy use in pelvic and acetabular surgery. This has provided orthopaedic trauma surgeons with a valuable tool to better evaluate reduction and fixation at different stages during operative treatment of these injuries. Specifically, intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy during treatment of acetabulum and pelvis injuries assists with guiding intraoperative decisions, assessing reductions, ensuring implant safety, and confirming appropriate fixation. We outline the useful aspects of this technology during pelvic and acetabular surgery and report its utility with a consecutive case series at a single institution. The added benefits of this technology have improved the ability to effectively manage patients with pelvis and acetabulum injuries.

A single shot arthroscopic reduction and screw fixation of posterior wall acetabular fracture

A single shot arthroscopic reduction and screw fixation of posterior wall acetabular fracture

Predictors of in-hospital surgical site infections in surgically managed acetabular fractures: A nationwide analysis

BackgroundA surgical site infection (SSI) rate of 4%–8% has been reported in patients who undergo open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for acetabular fractures. Studies have identified risk factors for SSI, but none have performed a nationwide analysis of SSI in surgically managed acetabular fracture patients. MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for patients who underwent ORIF for acetabular fractures from 2016 to 2019. Analysis was performed on all patients who underwent ORIF for acetabular fractures, as well as those who only underwent ORIF for isolated acetabular fractures. Clinical characteristics, hospital course, discharge disposition, and hospitalization costs were compared between groups. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to assess predictors of SSI. Results41,725 patients undergoing acetabular fracture repair were identified, of which 490 (1.2%) developed SSI during hospitalization. Age (45.90 vs 49.90, p < 0.001) and Injury Severity Scale (5.99 vs 8.30, p < 0.001) were increased in patients who developed SSI. History of hypertension (HTN) (OR = 2.343, 95% CI 1.96–2.80, p < 0.001), longer hospital length of stay (30.27 days vs 10.00 days, p < 0.001) and total charges ($469,005 vs $193,032, p < 0.001) were associated with SSI. Lower rates of routine discharge were seen in SSI patients (OR = 0.333, 95% CI 0.260–0.426, p < 0.001). Higher rates of inpatient death were associated with SSI (OR = 2.210, 95% CI 1.172–4.17, p = 0.019). Multiple procedures in addition to acetabular fracture repair, iliac artery embolization, substance abuse, later time to internal fixation and HTN were predictive of SSI (p < 0.001). ConclusionsSeverity of injury, time to fixation, and factors associated with compromised cardiovascular integrity were predictors of SSI. Identifying patients at risk for SSI should lead to clinical maneuvers that may optimize outcome.

Inclined angles of acetabular quadrilateral plate: digital measurement and clinical application of the new anatomical concept

PurposeMatta scoring standard is one of the most frequently used postoperative imaging evaluations for acetabular fracture reduction, but has obvious shortcomings. This study, for the first time, proposed the concept of inclined angles of acetabular quadrilateral plate. The purpose of this study was to investigate the normal range of the inclined angles in adults by digital measurement and explore the feasibility of using them to evaluate the reduction quality of acetabular quadrilateral fractures after surgery.MethodsFirstly, the pelvic CT three-dimensional reconstruction data of 40 healthy adults including 20 males and 20 females were collected. The normal range of the anterior, middle, and posterior inclined angles were measured via Mimics software. Secondly, a modified Matta criteria that combined the classic Matta criteria and evaluation criteria of the inclined angles was proposed. And we classified modified Matta criteria into three grades including excellent, good and poor. Finally, a total of 125 cases with quadrilateral plate fractures was included and the postoperative CT data were analyzed by using both the classic Matta criteria and our modified Matta criteria. Then, the accuracy and consistency of both criteria to evaluate postoperative hip function was investigated.ResultsThe average anterior inclined angle: male (97.11° ± 2.59°), female (90.63° ± 2.09°); middle inclined angle: male (105.57° ± 1.93°), female (100.64° ± 2.46°); and posterior inclined angle: male (112.62° ± 2.54), female (106.37° ± 2.53°). Whether in males or in females, the anterior, middle, and posterior inclined angles showed a progressively increasing trend. All the three inclined angles in males were all significantly larger than those in females (p < 0.05). Among 125 cases with quadrilateral plate fractures, 101 cases (80.8%) were graded as excellent, 18 cases (14.4%) as good, and 6 cases (4.8%) as poor according to the classic Matta criteria. While based on modified Matta criteria, there were excellent in 37 cases (29.6%), good in 76 cases (60.8%), and poor in 12 cases (9.6%). According to the Harris hip score system, the functional outcomes were excellent in 59 cases (47.2%), good in 26 cases (20.8%), fair in 24 cases (19.2%), and poor in 16 cases (12.8%). Our results showed that among the cases evaluated as excellent according to the classic Matta criteria and modified Matta criteria, the excellent-to-good rates of hip function were 70.3% and 78.4%, respectively. And among the cases evaluated as poor according to the modified Matta criteria, the fair-to-poor rate of hip function was 75%, while this value was 50% for classic Matta criteria. Both differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).ConclusionInclined angles of the quadrilateral plate could be used to assess the quality of fracture reduction and provide a basis for evaluating the rotational displacement of fracture blocks in the quadrilateral plate, which compensates the shortage of classic Matta criteria.

The Saint-Joseph Acetabular score: a reproducible and accurate prediction of the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures.

Acetabular fractures are associated to an increased risk of subsequent hip osteoarthritis. The only available score for post-operative reduction assessment in acetabular fractures (Matta's score) is x-ray based. CT-scan was shown superior to X-rays in post-operative reduction assessment. We aim to describe a CT-scan-based post-operative reduction score in acetabular fractures and evaluate its accuracy and reproducibility. This is a retrospective study that includes 138 patients who underwent surgery for an acetabular fracture in our tertiary referral centre with a mean follow-up of 104.39±42.2 months. The post-operative CT-scan was reviewed and residual displacement (maximum gap and step) measured by three independent observers. The association between the occurrence of THA and the CT-scan measurements was evaluated. This led to a new prognostic score. The interobserver reliability and accuracy of this score were calculated. Interobserver reproducibility for the residual maximal gap was 0.82 (95% CI [0.70-0.89]) and 0.61 (95% CI [0.52-0.70]) for the residual maximal step displacement measurements. We created a score from a logistic regression model, attributing 1 point for every 1 mm of residual maximal step displacement and 1 point for every 2 mm of residual maximal gap displacement. The interobserver reproducibility of this score was 0.78 (95% CI [0.71-0.84]), and its AUC was 0.79 (95% CI [0.69-0.88]). This is the first CT-scan-based score for the assessment of residual displacement of a surgically treated acetabular fracture. It shows good interobserver reproducibility and accuracy in predicting the risk for secondary THA. It should be regularly used per-operatively (if per-operative 3D imaging is available) and post-operatively to predict the prognosis.

Arthroscopic assistance during open reduction and fixation for complex acetabular fractures.

Achieving an anatomical reduction in acetabular fracture is essential but may also be challenging. Most of complex fractures are treated with anterior approaches without direct visualization of the acetabular surface. In this paper, we present the surgical technique for arthroscopic assistance during open reduction and fixation for complex acetabular fractures. To our knowledge, this technique has not been described in the literature yet.

Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasty with limited open reduction and internal fixation vs open reduction and internal fixation for geriatric acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Comminuted fractures with poor bone quality in the elderly are associated with poor outcomes. An alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone, primary or acute total hip arthroplasty (aTHA), allows early mobilization with full weight bearing. In this study, we aim to analyze whether treatment of aTHA with/withtout ORIF (limited ORIF) vs ORIF alone yields better intra-operative results, functional outcomes, and less complications. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals were used. The outcomes of interest were surgery time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, Harris hip score (HHS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), complication rate, surgical site infection rate, heterotopic ossification rate, reoperation rate, and mortality rate. Ten observational studies with a total of 642 patients (415 ORIF alone and 227 aTHA with/without ORIF) were included in the systematic review. Compared to ORIF alone, aTHA with limited ORIF provided higher HHS (P = 0.029), better physical function (P = 0.008), better physical component summary (P = 0.001), better mental component summary (P = 0.043) in postoperative 1-year SF-36, lesser complication rate (P = 0.001), and lesser reoperation rate (P = 0.000), but however greater bodily pain (P = 0.001) in acetabular fractured elderlies. Acute THA with limited ORIF is favorable alternative to ORIF technique alone. It provided better HHS, physical, and mental component summary in SF-36 and yielded lower complication and reoperation rate compare to ORIF alone.

Standard versus low-dose computed tomography for assessment of acetabular fracture reduction using novel step and gap measurement technique

PurposeQuality of reduction is of paramount importance after acetabular fracture and is best assessed on computed tomography (CT). A recently proposed measurement technique for assessment of step and gap displacement is reproducible but has not been validated. The purpose of this study is to validate a well-established measurement technique against known displacements and to determine if it can be used with low dose CT.MethodsPosterior wall acetabular fractures were created in 8 cadaveric hips and fixed at known step and gap displacements. CT was performed at multiple radiation doses for each hip. Four surgeons measured step and gap displacement for each hip at all doses, and the measurements were compared to known values.ResultsThere were no significant differences in measurements across surgeons, and all measurements were found to have positive agreement. Measurement error < 1.5 mm was present in 58% of gap measurements and 46% of step measurements. Only for step measurements at a dose of 120 kVp did we observe a statistically significant measurement error. There was a significant difference in step measurements made by those with greater and those with fewer years in practice.ConclusionOur study suggests this technique is valid and accurate across all doses. This is important as it may reduce the amount of radiation exposure for patients with acetabular fractures.

A Modified Cannulated Cancellous Bone Impactor Is a Helpful Tool During Acetabular Fractures ORIF, a Technical Note

A Modified Cannulated Cancellous Bone Impactor Is a Helpful Tool During Acetabular Fractures ORIF, a Technical Note

Fixation of pelvic acetabular fractures using 3D-printed fracture plates: a cadaver study

Open reduction and internal fixation of pelvic acetabular fractures are challenging due to the limited surgical exposure from surrounding abdominal tissue. There have been a number of recent trials using metallic 3D-printed pelvic fracture plates to simplify and improve various elements of these fracture fixation surgeries; however, the amount of time and accuracy involved in the design and implantation of customised plates have not been well characterised. This study recorded the amount of time related to the design, manufacture and implantation of six customised fracture plates for five cadaveric pelvic specimens with acetabular fracture, while manufacturing, and surgical accuracy was calculated from computed tomography imaging. Five of the fracture plates were designed within 9.5 h, while the plate for a pelvis with a pre-existing fracture plate took considerably longer (20.2 h). Manufacturing comprised 3D-printing the plates in Ti6Al4V with a sintered laser melting (SLM) 3D-printer and post-processing (heat treatment, smoothing, tapping threads). The manufacturing times varied from 27.0 to 32.5 h, with longer times related to machining a thread for locking-head screws with a multi-axis computer numerical control (CNC) mill. For the surface of the plate in contact with the bone, the root-mean-square errors of the print varied from 0.10 to 0.49 mm. The upper range of these errors was likely the result of plate designs that were relatively long with thin cross-sections, a combination that gives rise to high thermal stresses when using a SLM 3D-printer. A number of approaches were explored to control the trajectories of locking or non-locking head screws including guides, printed threads or hand-taps; however, the plate with CNC-machined threads was clearly the most accurate with screw angulation errors of 2.77° (range 1.05–6.34°). The implanted position of the plates was determined visually; however, the limited surgical exposure and lack of intra-operative fluoroscopy in the laboratory led to high inaccuracies (translational errors of 1.74–13.00 mm). Plate mal-positioning would lead to increased risk of surgical injury due to misplaced screws; hence, it is recommended that technologies that can control plate positioning such as fluoroscopy or alignment guides need to be implemented into customised plate design and implantation workflow. Due to the plate misalignment and the severe nature of some acetabular fractures comprising numerous small bone fragments, the acetabular reduction exceeded the clinical limit of 2 mm for three pelvises. Although our results indicate that customised plates are unsuitable for acetabular fractures comprising six or more fragments, confirmation of this finding with a greater number of specimens is recommended. The times, accuracy and suggested improvements in the current study may be used to guide future workflows aimed at producing customised pelvic fracture plates for greater numbers of patients.

Surgical approach of T-type acetabular fractures does not affect quality of reduction on postoperative CT or the likelihood of postoperative complications

IntroductionT-type acetabular fractures are rare but challenging injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate for associations between chosen surgical approach for T-type acetabular fracture fixation, reduction quality, and complications. MethodsRetrospective, single institution study of T-type acetabular fractures who underwent surgical fixation. Surgical interventions included open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through an anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP) (modified Rives-Stoppa) and/or posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck [KL]), or percutaneous screw fixation. The primary outcome was reduction quality on routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan and postoperative complications. ResultsDuring the study period (March 2016 – October 2022), 22 patients presented with T-type acetabular fractures. Surgical approaches included AIP [31.8% (7/22)], percutaneous [27.3% (6/22)], AIP+KL [22.7% (5/22)], and KL [18.2% (4/22)]. On CT scans, 9.0% (2/22) had anatomic reductions, 27.2% (6/22) had fair reductions, and 63.6% (14/22) had poor reductions based on Matta Reduction Criteria. There was no observed difference in reduction quality between surgical approaches. Poor reductions (> 3 mm) were not associated with surgical approach, fracture classification, unstable pelvic ring injuries, posterior wall fractures, T-stem component, transverse component, preoperative articular displacement, preoperative femoral head protrusion, or surgeon experience. Complications occurred in 50.0% (11/22) of patients. No observed difference in complication rates was noted between the surgical approaches. ConclusionT-type acetabular fractures are challenging injuries with few patients achieving anatomic reduction on postoperative CT scans and half of patients developing complications.

The value of digital 3D models in evaluating surgical outcomes using the uninjured contralateral acetabulum after acetabular fracture repair

BackgroundCurrently, assessment of acetabular fracture reduction is mainly performed by evaluating 2D slices of 3D CT scans. This subjective method can potentially be improved by using 3D models and objective analysis tools. In order to evaluate the potential value of digital 3D reconstructed models in the assessment of acetabular fracture reduction, 3D reconstructions of the fractured acetabulum were compared to the mirrored healthy contralateral side for both the pre-, and post-surgical setting. MethodsThirteen patients with one-sided acetabular fractures were included in the study. All patients received a pre-, and postoperative CT scan. The similarity between the healthy acetabulum and the contralateral fractured acetabulum was determined by two observers for both the pre-, and postoperative setting by completing the following four steps; (1) mirroring of the fractured acetabulum, (2) initial manual alignment of this mirrored 3D model to the contralateral version, (3) surface-based matching (iterative closest point registration) using the acetabular cartilage surface, and (4) calculating the surface distances between affected and healthy acetabular 3D models. Descriptive statistics showed the surface distance between pre-, and post-surgical reduction, as well as the interobserver variability. ResultsA total of 13 patients with an acetabular fracture were included; 11 males and 2 females with a mean ± SD age of 55.6 ± 14.7 years. Digital mirroring of the fractured acetabula to the healthy acetabula was successful for both preoperative and postoperative situations in all patients. The median distance between both fractured and mirrored healthy contralateral acetabula was significantly larger (p<0.01) for the preoperative group (2.21 mm (interquartile range (IQR): 1.30 mm)) compared to the postoperative group (0.93 mm (IQR: 0.59 mm)). The median distance deviation was not significantly different (p = 0.96) between observers. ConclusionsThe results of comparing 3D model of fractured acetabula with the contra-lateral healthy acetabula before, and after surgical repair indicate that this method can be a suitable tool to objectively assess acetabular fracture reduction. Further research is needed to confirm the usefulness to predict future arthrosis after surgical repair.

Comparison of Percutaneous Screw Fixation to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Acetabular Fractures: A Matched Pair Study Regarding the Short-Term Rate of Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty and Functional Outcomes.

Closed reduction and percutaneous internal fixation (CRPIF) for acetabular fractures was introduced as a less invasive alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for moderately displaced fractures. Currently, comparisons of ORIF and CRPIF outcomes are rare. Twenty-three patients treated with CRPIF were matched with patients treated with ORIF based on sex, age, and fracture classification. Surgery-dependent and -independent factors of the in-hospital stay, the conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and quality of life were assessed. The ORIF group had a higher preoperative fracture step (p = 0.04) and gull wing sign (p = 0.003) compared with the CRPIF group. Postoperatively, the gap and step size were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05). CRPIF required less time (p < 0.0001) and transfusions (p = 0.009) and showed fewer complications (p = 0.0287). Four patients were converted to THA (CRPIF, n = 1; ORIF, n = 3; p = 0.155) because of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Functional outcomes and pain were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). The present study revealed less blood loss and a lesser extent of reduction in patients treated with CRPIF than in those treated with ORIF. The rates of conversion to THA and functional outcomes did not differ between CRPIF and ORIF. CRPIF appeared to be a valuable treatment option for selected patients.