Reduction In Tardive Dyskinesia Research Articles

Clozapine Monotherapy as a Treatment for Antipsychotic-Induced Tardive Dyskinesia: A Meta-Analysis.

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is an antipsychotic-induced movement disorder that typically occurs after long-term exposure to antipsychotic drugs. There is evidence that switching to clozapine reduces TD. This meta-analysis reviews the effect of switching to clozapine on the severity of TD. The PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were searched for clozapine, tardive dyskinesia, and related keywords. The search was restricted to articles written in English and Dutch, and it was last updated on October 13, 2015. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of schizophrenia or a related disorder, a switch to clozapine monotherapy, and reports of scores on a TD rating scale before and after the switch to clozapine. Two independent investigators extracted the data. Data were converted to standardized mean change scores and analyzed in a random-effects model. A random-effects model showed that the overall effect of switching to clozapine was a significant reduction in TD (npatients = 1,060, d = -0.40, P < .01), especially in the 4 studies that investigated the severity of TD as a primary outcome (npatients = 48, d = -2.56, P = .02). The overall results show that clozapine treatment can yield a slight reduction in TD. The severity of TD was reduced greatly in patients with moderate to severe TD. In patients with minimal to mild TD, switching to clozapine seldom worsens TD and a trend toward reduction is seen. These results support that a switch to clozapine should be considered for patients with moderate to severe TD and/or patients who experience substantial discomfort due to TD.

Antipsychotic reduction and/or cessation and antipsychotics as specific treatments for tardive dyskinesia.

Since the 1950s antipsychotic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have also been associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD) - a problem often seen as repetitive involuntary movements around the mouth and face. Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to antipsychotics. These strategies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies such as drug holidays, and antipsychotic cessation. To determine whether a reduction or cessation of antipsychotic drugs is associated with a reduction in TD for people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) who have existing TD. Our secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific antipsychotics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for TD that was already established. We updated previous searches of Cochrane Schizophrenia's study-based Register of Trials including the registers of clinical trials (16 July 2015 and 26 April 2017). We searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We also contacted authors of trials for additional information. We included reports if they assessed people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses who had established antipsychotic-induced TD, and had been randomly allocated to (a) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic cessation (placebo or no intervention), (b) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic reduction (including intermittent strategies), (c) specific antipsychotics for the treatment of TD versus placebo or no intervention, and (d) specific antipsychotics versus other antipsychotics or versus any other drugs for the treatment of TD. We independently extracted data from these trials and estimated risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assumed that people who dropped out had no improvement. We included 13 RCTs with 711 participants; eight of these studies were newly included in this 2017 update. One trial is ongoing.There was low-quality evidence of a clear difference on no clinically important improvement in TD favouring switch to risperidone compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (1 RCT, 42 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.23 to 0.89, low-quality evidence). Because evidence was of very low quality for antipsychotic dose reduction versus antipsychotic maintenance (2 RCTs, 17 people, RR 0.42 95% CI 0.17 to 1.04, very low-quality evidence), and for switch to a new antipsychotic versus switch to another new antipsychotic (5 comparisons, 5 RCTs, 140 people, no meta-analysis, effects for all comparisons equivocal), we are uncertain about these effects. There was low-quality evidence of a significant difference on extrapyramidal symptoms: use of antiparkinsonism medication favouring switch to quetiapine compared with switch to haloperidol (1 RCT, 45 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.21 to 0.96, low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference for switch to risperidone or haloperidol compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (RR 1 RCT, 48 people, RR 2.08 95% CI 0.74 to 5.86, low-quality evidence) and switch to risperidone compared with switch to haloperidol (RR 1 RCT, 37 people, RR 0.68 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35, very low-quality evidence).Trials also reported on secondary outcomes such as other TD symptom outcomes, other adverse events outcomes, mental state, and leaving the study early, but the quality of the evidence for all these outcomes was very low due mainly to small sample sizes, very wide 95% CIs, and risk of bias. No trials reported on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks, or personalised quality of life, outcomes that we designated as being important to patients. Limited data from small studies using antipsychotic reduction or specific antipsychotic drugs as treatments for TD did not provide any convincing evidence of the value of these approaches. There is a need for larger trials of a longer duration to fully investigate this area.

Deutetrabenazine for tardive dyskinesia: A systematic review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved novel medication-What is the number needed to treat, number needed to harm and likelihood to be helped or harmed?

Deutetrabenazine is a deuterated formulation of tetrabenazine. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the efficacy, tolerability and safety of deutetrabenazine for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD). The pivotal registration trials were accessed by querying http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ and http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, for the search terms 'deutetrabenazine' OR 'SD-809', and by also querying the EMBASE (Elsevier) commercial database for clinical poster abstracts, and by asking the manufacturer for copies of posters presented at congresses. Product labelling provided additional information. All available clinical reports of studies were identified. Descriptions of the principal results and calculation of number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) for relevant dichotomous outcomes were extracted from the available study reports and other sources of information. Deutetrabenazine, a reversible inhibitor of vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2), received approval for the treatment of TD in adults based on a clinical trial development programme that included two 12-week parallel group, randomised and placebo-controlled studies. Deutetrabenazine dose is determined individually for each patient based on reduction of TD and tolerability. The recommended starting dose of deutetrabenazine for TD is 6mg BID, administered with food, and can be increased at weekly intervals in increments of 6mg/day to a maximum recommended daily dosage of 24mg BID. The percentage of responders in the fixed-dose Phase III acute study, as defined by a rating of "much improved" or "very much improved" on the clinical global impression of change, was 46% for deutetrabenazine (pooled dose groups 12 and 18mg BID) vs 26% for placebo, yielding a NNT of 5 (95% CI 3-19); the percentage of responders as defined by an improvement in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) severity score (sum of items 1-7) of 50% or more, was 34% for deutetrabenazine (pooled dose groups 12 and 18mg BID) vs 12% for placebo, yielding a NNT of 5 (95% CI 3-11). Pooling the data across both short-term studies, NNT for AIMS response for the therapeutic doses of deutetrabenazine vs placebo was 7 (95% CI 4-18). Discontinuation because of an adverse event occurred among 3.6% of patients randomised to deutetrabenazine (any dose) vs 3.1% for placebo, yielding a NNH of 189 (not significant). The Likelihood to be Helped or Harmed comparing success (AIMS response) vs discontinuation because of an adverse event is 27. The most common adverse reactions (that occurred in ≥4% of deutetrabenazine-treated patients with TD and greater than placebo) were nasopharyngitis and insomnia, with NNH values of 50 (not significant) and 34 (95% CI 18-725), respectively. Deutetrabenazine is the second FDA-approved agent specifically indicated for the treatment of TD. Head-to-head comparisons with other VMAT2 inhibitors among patients with TD in the "real world" are needed.

Deutetrabenazine for treatment of involuntary movements in patients with tardive dyskinesia (AIM-TD): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Tardive dyskinesia results from exposure to dopamine receptor antagonists, such as typical and atypical antipsychotics. If clinically appropriate, clinicians often manage this disorder by lowering the dose of, or discontinuing, the causative drug. There is a significant unmet need for a treatment option that does not disrupt treatment regimens for underlying psychiatric illnesses. We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fixed doses of deutetrabenazine-a novel vesicular monoamine transporter-2 inhibitor-in patients with tardive dyskinesia. We did this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at 75 centres in the USA and Europe. Patients aged 18-80 years with tardive dyskinesia (≥3 months before screening) were randomly assigned centrally (1:1:1:1), via interactive response technology, to receive one of three fixed doses of deutetrabenazine (12 mg/day, 24 mg/day, or 36 mg/day) or matching placebo. Randomisation was stratified by baseline use of dopamine receptor antagonists. Patients were started on oral deutetrabenazine 12 mg/day, and this dose was increased through week 4 until the randomised dose was achieved, then maintained over 8 weeks. During the treatment period, patients, investigators, their site personnel, and sponsor were masked to group assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score from baseline to week 12 in patients with at least one post-baseline rating. The primary efficacy analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat population (baseline AIMS score ≥6 and at least one post-baseline rating). The safety analysis was done in patients who received any study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02291861. Between Oct 29, 2014, and Aug 19, 2016, we randomly assigned 298 patients to receive at least one dose of placebo (n=74), deutetrabenazine 12 mg/day (n=75), 24 mg/day (n=74), or 36 mg/day (n=75); 222 patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population and 293 patients comprised the safety population. From baseline to week 12, the least-squares mean AIMS score improved by -3·3 points (SE 0·42) in the deutetrabenazine 36 mg/day group, -3·2 points (0·45) in the 24 mg/day group, and -2·1 points (0·42) in the 12 mg/day group, with a treatment difference of -1·9 points (SE 0·58, 95% CI -3·09 to -0·79; p=0·001), -1·8 points (0·60, -3·00 to -0·63; p=0·003), and -0·7 points (0·57, -1·84 to 0·42; p=0·217), respectively, versus -1·4 points (0·41) in the placebo group. The rate of adverse events was similar between patients in the deutetrabenazine 36 mg/day group (n=38/74 [51%]), 24 mg/day group (n=32/73 [44%]), and 12 mg/day group (n=36/74 [49%]), and those in the placebo group (n=34/72 [47%]). Serious adverse events were reported in four (5%) patients given deutetrabenazine 36 mg/day, six (8%) patients given 24 mg/day, and two (3%) patients given 12 mg/day, compared with four (6%) patients given placebo. Two (1%) patients in the safety population died, one each in the deutetrabenazine 24 mg/day and 36 mg/day groups; neither death was deemed related to study drug by the investigator or sponsor. Deutetrabenazine 24 mg/day and 36 mg/day provided a significant reduction in tardive dyskinesia, with favourable safety and tolerability. These findings suggest that dosing regimens could be individualised and tailored for patients on the basis of dyskinesia control and tolerability. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.

Effect of Antipsychotic Type and Dose Changes on Tardive Dyskinesia and Parkinsonism Severity in Patients With a Serious Mental Illness: The Curaçao Extrapyramidal Syndromes Study XII.

To test the efficacy of current treatment recommendations for parkinsonism and tardive dyskinesia (TD) severity in patients with severe mental illness (SMI). We present an 18-year prospective study including all 223 patients with SMI (as defined by the 1987 US National Institute of Mental Health, which were based on DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria) receiving care from the only psychiatric hospital of the former Netherlands Antilles. Eight clinical assessments (1992-2009) focused on movement disorders and medication use. Tardive dyskinesia was measured by the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale and parkinsonism by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Antipsychotics were classified into first-generation antipsychotic (FGA) versus second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) and high versus low dopamine 2 (D₂) affinity categories. The effect that switching has within each category on subsequent movement scores was calculated separately by using time-lagged multilevel logistic regression models. There was a significant association between reduction in TD severity and starting/switching to an FGA (B = -3.54, P < .001) and starting/switching to a high D₂ affinity antipsychotic (B = -2.49, P < .01). Adding an SGA to existing FGA treatment was associated with reduction in TD severity (B = -2.43, P < .01). For parkinsonism, stopping antipsychotics predicted symptom reduction (B = -7.76, P < .01 in FGA/SGA-switch model; B = -7.74, P < .01 in D₂ affinity switch model), while starting a high D₂ affinity antipsychotic predicted an increase in symptoms (B = 3.29, P < .05 in D₂ affinity switch model). The results show that switching from an FGA to an SGA does not necessarily result in a reduction of TD or parkinsonism. Only stopping all antipsychotics reduces the severity of parkinsonism, and starting an FGA or a high D₂ affinity antipsychotic may reduce the severity of TD.

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels and Its Val66Met Gene Polymorphism Predict Tardive Dyskinesia Treatment Response to Ginkgo Biloba

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) has no well-accepted treatments or known pathophysiology, but low brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may play an important role in its pathophysiology. Ginkgo biloba (EGb-761) is a potent antioxidant that has neuroprotective effects mediated through enhancing BDNF levels. We hypothesized that treatment with EGb-761 would increase serum BDNF levels and reduce TD, particularly among schizophrenia patients who have the BDNF valine 66 to methionine (Val66Met) genotype (Val/Val). Serum BDNF levels and genotyping for the BDNF gene Val66Met polymorphism were assessed in Chinese schizophrenic patients with (n = 368) and without (n = 563) TD as well as healthy control subjects (n = 546). About half of the TD patients (n = 157) then participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-control 12-week treatment with 240 mg per day of EGb-761. Serum BDNF levels were measured again at posttreatment. Clinical efficacy was determined using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). TD patients had lower BDNF levels than the non-TD patients and healthy controls. EGb-761 treatment improved symptoms of TD and increased BDNF levels compared with placebo treatment. Moreover, the improvement of AIMS total score correlated with the increase in BDNF levels. Furthermore, improvement in the AIMS score was greatest in those with the Val/Val allele and lowest with the Met/Met allele. The BDNF system may be implicated in the pathophysiology of TD and its improvement with antioxidant treatment. Furthermore, patients with the genetic potential for greater BDNF release (Val/Val at 66) may obtain a greater reduction in TD from EGb-761 treatment.

Neuroleptic reduction and/or cessation and neuroleptics as specific treatments for tardive dyskinesia

Since the 1950s neuroleptic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have been also associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD). Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to neuroleptics. These studies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies such as drug holidays, and neuroleptic cessation. To determine whether a reduction or cessation of neuroleptic drugs is associated with a reduction in TD, for people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) who have existing TD. Our secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific neuroleptics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for TD that was already established. We updated previous searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Groups Register (1997), Biological Abstracts (1982-1997), EMBASE (1980-1997), LILACS (1982-1996), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997), and SCISEARCH (1997) by searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Groups Register (July 2003). We searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We also contacted the principal authors of trials for further unpublished trials. We included reports if they assessed people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses who had established neuroleptic-induced TD, and had been randomly allocated to (a) neuroleptic maintenance versus neuroleptic cessation (placebo or no intervention), (b) neuroleptic maintenance versus neuroleptic reduction (including intermittent strategies), and (c) specific neuroleptics for the treatment of TD versus, placebo or intervention. A post hoc decision was made to broaden comparison (c) to include specific neuroleptics versus other neuroleptics for the treatment of TD. We (KSW, JR) independently inspected citations and, where possible, abstracts, ordered papers, and re-inspected and quality assessed these and extracted data. We analysed dichotomous data using random effects relative risk (RR) and estimated the 95% confidence interval (CI). Where possible we calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm statistic (NNH). We excluded continuous data if more than 50% of people were lost to follow up, but, where possible, we calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD). It was assumed that those leaving the study early showed no improvement. We included five trials and excluded 102. One small two week study (n=18), reported on the 'masking' effects of molindone and haloperidol on TD, which favoured haloperidol (RR 3.44 CI 1.1 to 5.8). Two (total n=17) studies found no reduction in TD associated with neuroleptic reduction (RR 0.38 CI 0.1 to 1.0). One study (n=20) found no significant differences in oral dyskinesia (RR 2.45 CI 0.3 to 19.7) when neuroleptics were compared as a specific treatment for TD. Dyskinesia was found to be not significantly different (n=32, RR 0.62 CI 0.3 to 1.26) between quetiapine and haloperidol when these neuroleptics were used as specific treatments for TD, although the need for additional neuroleptics was significantly lower in the quetiapine group (n=47, RR 0.49 CI 0.2 to 1.0) than in those given haloperidol. Limited data from small studies using neuroleptic reduction or specific neuroleptic drugs as treatments for TD did not provide any convincing evidence of the value of these approaches. There is a need for larger trials of a longer duration in order to fully investigate this area.

Olanzapine treatment for tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia patients: a prospective clinical trial with patients randomized to blinded dose reduction periods

Background: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a potentially persistent and disabling abnormal involuntary movement disorder. The aim of this 8-month study was to determine if olanzapine treatment could lead to a significant and persistent reduction in preexisting TD. Methods: Eligible schizophrenia patients met restricted Research Diagnosis criteria of TD requiring, in part, a rating of at least moderate severity (score≥3) in one or more of seven body regions on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Patients received olanzapine, 5–20 mg/day, for 8 months. During this period, they underwent one to two dose reduction periods under blinded conditions. Concurrent changes in TD, psychopathology, parkinsonism and akathisia were assessed with the AIMS, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Simpson-Angus and Barnes Akathisia Scales, respectively. Results: A significant reduction in mean AIMS total score was demonstrated at endpoint ( n=92; p<0.001) as well as at each visit ( p<0.001) and as early as Week 1 on olanzapine. Approximately 70% of patients no longer met the restricted Research Diagnostic criteria for persistent TD (RD-TD) after 8 months of treatment. No statistically significant rebound worsening of TD was found during either blinded drug reduction period. Significant improvement in psychopathology ( p=0.001) and parkinsonism ( p<0.001) was observed. Conclusions: Improvement in the severity of preexisting TD was achieved with olanzapine and persisted throughout the 8-month study and during each dose reduction period. Overall improvement in clinical status suggests that olanzapine may be effective for the long-term management of schizophrenia patients with preexisting TD.

The Effect of Clozapine on Caudate Nucleus Volume in Schizophrenic Patients Previously Treated with Typical Antipsychotics

Typical antipsychotics have been reported to enlarge the caudate nucleus in schizophrenic patients. The atypical antipsychotic, clozapine, is associated with a decrease in caudate size in patients previously treated with typical antipsychotics. The present study investigates whether a change in caudate volume after switching from treatment with typical antipsychotics to treatment with clozapine is related to improvement in symptoms or tardive dyskinesia (TD). Twenty-six schizophrenic patients participated in this open study. Caudate nucleus volume and TD were assessed before discontinuing typical antipsychotics and after 24 weeks of treatment with clozapine. After discontinuing typical antipsychotics, symptoms were assessed in a 3 days drug-free period and subsequently once a month. Treatment with clozapine resulted in a decrease in caudate volume, improvement in symptoms and amelioration of TD. However, no difference in caudate volume changes was found between responders and non-responders to clozapine and no correlations were found between caudate volume changes and reduction of TD. In conclusion, this study replicates earlier findings that clozapine decreases caudate volume in patients previously treated with typical antipsychotics and suggests that this effect is unrelated to treatment response or to amelioration of TD.

Neuroleptic reduction and/or cessation and neuroleptics as specific treatments for tardive dyskinesia.

Since the 1950s neuroleptic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have been also associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD). Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to neuroleptics. These studies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies, such as drug holidays, and neuroleptic cessation. To determine whether, for those people with both schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) and tardive dyskinesia (TD), a reduction or cessation of neuroleptic drugs was associated with reduction in TD symptoms. A secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific neuroleptics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for already established TD. Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1997), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials (1997), EMBASE (1980-1997), LILACS (1982-1996), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997), and SCISEARCH (1997) were undertaken. References of all identified studies were searched for further trial citations. Principal authors of trials were contacted. Reports were included if they assessed the treatment of neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia in people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses and already established TD, who had been randomly allocated to (a) neuroleptic cessation (placebo or no intervention) versus neuroleptic maintenance; b. neuroleptic reduction (including intermittent strategies) versus neuroleptic maintenance; or c. specific neuroleptics for the treatment of TD versus placebo or no intervention. The reviewers extracted the data independently and the Odds Ratio (95% CI) or the average difference (95% CI) were estimated. The reviewers assumed that people who dropped out had no improvement. Two trials were able to be included in this review. Sixty two were excluded and 16 are awaiting assessment. Seven trials are still pending classification. No randomised controlled trial-derived data were available to clarify the role of neuroleptics as treatments for TD. This includes the atypical antipsychotics including clozapine. Despite neuroleptic cessation being a frequently first-line recommendation, there were no RCT-derived data to support this. Two studies ( approximately approximately Cookson 1987 approximately approximately , approximately approximately Kane 1983 approximately approximately ) found a reduction in TD associated with neuroleptic reduction. The lack of evidence to support the efficacy of neuroleptic cessation as a treatment for TD, combined with the accumulating evidence of an increased risk of relapse should antipsychotic drugs be reduced, makes this intervention a hazardous treatment for TD. Dose reduction may offer some benefit as a treatment for TD compared to standard levels of neuroleptic use. There is a need to evaluate the utility of clozapine and the 'atypical' antipsychotics as treatments for established TD.

Brief Intermittent Neuroleptic Prophylaxis for Selected Schizophrenic Out-patients

“A study was conducted to investigate a novel approach to the prophylaxis of schizophrenic relapse. The treatment strategy comprised brief intermittent courses of neuroleptic agents begun as soon as non-psychotic symptoms believed to be early signs of relapse appeared. Fifty four stable, remitted outpatients meeting the American Psychiatric Association's DSM–III criteria for schizophrenia were randomised double blind to receive brief intermittent treatment with either active or placebo depot neuroleptic injections. Only three patients given placebo injections and two controls were admitted to hospital during one year of follow up. Eight (30%) of the patients given placebo injections and only 2 (7%) of the controls, however, had a recurrence of schizophrenic symptoms. Patients given placebo injections experienced fewer extrapyramidal side effects and showed a trend towards a reduction in tardive dyskinesia. Dysphoric and neurotic symptoms were identified before eight out of 11 relapses, and these symptoms were more frequent in patients given placebo depot injections. These results suggest a viable but not necessarily better alternative to continuous oral or depot treatment for less ill, chronic, stabilised schizophrenics based on the early treatment of putative prodromal symptoms of relapse.”

Trial of brief intermittent neuroleptic prophylaxis for selected schizophrenic outpatients: clinical outcome at one year.

A study was conducted to investigate a novel approach to the prophylaxis of schizophrenic relapse. The treatment strategy comprised brief intermittent courses of neuroleptic agents begun as soon as non-psychotic symptoms believed to be early signs of relapse appeared. Fifty four stable, remitted outpatients meeting the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia were randomised double blind to receive brief intermittent treatment with either active or placebo depot neuroleptic injections. Only three patients given placebo injections and two controls were admitted to hospital during one year of follow up. Eight (30%) of the patients given placebo injections and only 2 (7%) of the controls, however, had a recurrence of schizophrenic symptoms. Patients given placebo injections experienced fewer extrapyramidal side effects and showed a trend towards a reduction in tardive dyskinesia. Dysphoric and neurotic symptoms were identified before eight out of 11 relapses, and these symptoms were more frequent in patients given placebo depot injections. These results suggest a viable but not necessarily better alternative to continuous oral or depot treatment for less ill, chronic, stabilised schizophrenics based on the early treatment of putative prodromal symptoms of relapse.