Reduction In Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Research Articles

Abstract 4136741: Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors and Lipid Reduction: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors offer additional lipid reduction beyond that achieved with statins. However, the optimal PCSK9 therapy for lowering lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia on background statin therapy remains unclear. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for RCTs assessing tafolecimab, evolocumab or alirocumab vs. placebo (administrated Q2W or Q4W, 12-week treatment) in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia on medium-intensity statin up to March 28, 2024. The outcomes of interest were the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or lipoprotein(a) from baseline to the 12th week. A frequentist random-effect network meta-analysis was applied to calculate MD and 95% CI using Stata 16.0 software. Results: A total of 4960 patients [PCSK9 inhibitors (n=3230), placebo (n=1730)] across 13 RCTs were included. At week 12, tafolecimab, evolocumab and alirocumab (either Q2W or Q4W) all induced significant reductions in LDL-C levels compared to placebo ( Figure ). The efficacy of evolocumab Q2W was significantly higher compared with alirocumab Q2W (MD=-18.67%, 95% Cl [-29.59%, -7.74%]), while similar LDL-C reduction was observed in tafolecimab Q2W vs. alirocumab Q2W and evolocumab Q2W vs. tafolecimab Q2W. Furthermore, tafolecimab Q4W and evolocumab Q4W were more effective in lowering LDL-C levels compared to alirocumab Q4W (tafolecimab vs. alirocumab: MD=-23.66%, 95% Cl [-32.58%, -14.74%]; evolocumab vs. alirocumab: MD=-25.84%, 95% Cl [-34.21%, -17.46%]), while there was no difference between evolocumab Q4W and tafolecimab Q4W. Lastly, the ranking of the effects for reducing lipoprotein(a) levels was as follows: tafolecimab > evolocumab> alirocumab (either Q2W or Q4W). Conclusions: In patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia treated with medium-intensity statins, tafolecimab and evolocumab (either Q2W or Q4W) might be preferred choices for lowering LDL-C. Additionally, tafolecimab (either Q2W or Q4W) appears to be the most effective agent for reducing lipoprotein(a) levels.

Abstract 4131951: The Safety Profile Of Inclisiran In Patients With Dyslipidemia And Intermediate To High Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Inclisiran is a novel drug that employs ribonucleic acid (RNA) interference to lower levels of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein, thereby improving the clearance of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from the bloodstream. It is given through subcutaneous injections at specified intervals and significantly reduces LDL cholesterol levels in patients with dyslipidemia and with intermediate to high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Goal: We aim to evaluate the safety of the use of inclisiran in patients with dyslipidemia and intermediate to high ASCVD risk. Methods: Three electronic databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to May 5th 2024 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety profiles of inclisiran versus the control group . The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), injection-site reaction and all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). The effect estimates of outcomes were assessed using risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the restricted maximum likelihood method given the inter-study variance was inevitable. The subgroup analysis was performed based on different dosing regimens. Results: We included 7 RCTs enrolling 4790 patients (63.8 ± 9.7 years, 66.8 % males) who received inclisiran. Compared to the control group, the use of inclisiran did not yield a significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.54; I 2 = 0%), MACE (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.17; I 2 = 0%), and TEAE (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.74 to 4.15; I 2 = 74%). However, inclisiran use significantly increased injection-site reaction (RR, 7.08; 95% CI, 3.42 to 14.64; I 2 = 27%). Results are illustrated in the accompanying figure. Conclusions: Inclisiran use significantly increased injection-site reaction, with no increase in mortality and TEAE. Further trials are required to comprehensively assess the safety of inclisiran in the management of dyslipidemia in patients with ASCVD risk.

Efficacy and diabetes risk of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin after percutaneous coronary intervention

BackgroundsHigh-intensity statin is recommended for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and ezetimibe is recommended to be added in patients not achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe can reduce LDL-C levels similar to high-intensity statin. The aim of this study is to examine the long-term efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe as the first-line strategy compared to high-intensity statin in patients undergoing PCI.MethodData was obtained from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database of South Korea. Patients who underwent PCI from 2012 to 2017 were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), a composite of all-cause death, revascularization, or ischemic stroke. The safety endpoint was new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM).ResultsA total of 45,501 patients received high-intensity statin (n = 38,340) or moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (n = 7,161). Among propensity-score-matched 7,161 pairs, MACCEs occurred in 1,460 patients with high-intensity statin and 1,406 patients with moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (33.8% vs. 31.9%, hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.89–1.03, P = 0.27) at a median follow-up of 2.7 years. DM was newly diagnosed in 398 patients with high-intensity statin and 342 patients with moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (12.5% vs. 10.7%; hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.73–0.97, P = 0.02).ConclusionIn patients undergoing PCI, moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe demonstrated a similar risk of MACCEs but a lower risk of new-onset DM than high-intensity statin. Early combination treatment of moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe may be a useful and safe lipid-lowering strategy after PCI.Graphical abstractCumulative incidence according to the first-line lipid-lowering strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Abbreviation: MACCE, major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Gene-Based Targeting for Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia and Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Familial hypercholesterolemia, characterized by high levels of LDL cholesterol is a monogenic metabolic disorder linked to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Several genetic mutations in genes such as LDLR and PSK9 are thought to cause familial hypercholesterolemia. This ultimately causes dysfunction of the LDLR pathway, increasing circulating LDL levels. Current treatment revolves around decreasing LDL cholesterol levels in the blood. Statins are the current gold standard while sterol absorption inhibitors (ezetimibe) and PCSK9 inhibitors (evolocumab) are either used as primary treatment in individuals with statin intolerance, or supplementary treatment otherwise. However, CRISPR-Cas9 offers an upstream therapeutic intervention, inducing mutations in pathogenic genes (such as LDLR) to upregulate or downregulate gene expression and subsequently reduce LDL cholesterol levels. This technology thus has great potential as a two-fold treatment option, offering an effective solution for familial hypercholesterolemia, while simultaneously diminishing the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. A limitation to current research exists in the sole analysis of monogenic factors in genetic screening, thus polygenic, multifactorial analyses are required to assess more holistic treatment plans. Furthermore, there exist current limitations to CRISPR-Cas9 including ethical limitations and social considerations revolving around the perpetuation of social inequities through technology necessitating future research on global health policies.

Aerobic exercise alleviates statin-induced PCSK9 upregulation by increasing epoxyeicosatrienoic acid levels through the FoxO3a-Sirt6 axis

BackgroundStatins are the cornerstone of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy; however, the therapeutic efficacy of statins in countering atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is compromised by the concurrent elevation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), a pivotal molecule that increases LDL-C levels. Aerobic exercise lowers PCSK9 levels, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated how aerobic exercise can ameliorate statin-induced increases in PCSK9 levels. MethodsThree-week-old male American Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice were fed a high-fat-cholesterol diet (HFD) for 12 weeks and then administered atorvastatin alone or atorvastatin combined with aerobic exercise (Statin+Ex). Moreover, a total of 165 participants with stable coronary heart disease (CHD) enrolled at the inpatient and outpatient departments of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2018 to July 2020 were randomized into the Statin group (male/female = 51/33) and Statin+Ex group (male/female = 52/29). Patients in the Statin+Ex group underwent treadmill exercise of 45–60 min/day for 7 days. ResultsAerobic exercise effectively alleviated statin-induced PCSK9 upregulation in human patients with CHD and hypercholesterolemic ICR mice (all p< 0.05). Mechanistically, our findings revealed that aerobic exercise induced elevated epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) plasma levels while concurrently reducing the activity of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) (all p < 0.05), an enzyme responsible for EETs degradation. Further, EETs significantly suppressed PCSK9 expression, subsequently reducing the LDL-C levels (all p < 0.05); this effect was mediated via the activation of the Forkhead box O3a-Silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog 6 (FoxO3a-Sirt6) axis, with no impact on the Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2 and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase(SREBP2-HMGCR) pathway. ConclusionOur study sheds light on the paradigm of "Exercise is Medicine", providing evidence to support the use of statins combined with exercise in reducing LDL-C levels, and unveils potential avenues for clinical applications of sEH inhibitors, presenting novel prospects for therapeutic interventions in ASCVD.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ongericimab: A potential long-acting PCSK9 monoclonal antibody in healthy subjects and patients with hypercholesterolemia: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ia and Ib/II studies.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) increases plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) by decreasing the expression of the LDL-receptor on hepatic cells. Ongericimab (JS002) is a novel PCSK9 monoclonal antibody that exhibits a long-acting LDL-C lowering effect by exclusively inhibiting PCSK9 in pre-clinical studies. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles of ongericimab in healthy subjects and patients with hypercholesterolemia. Eighty-four healthy subjects in the phase Ia study received a single dose of placebo or ongericimab (15-450 mg). Ninety patients with hypercholesterolemia in the phase Ib/II study received placebo or ongericimab 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, or 450 mg Q4W for 12 weeks. Ongericimab exhibited non-linear kinetics. The apparent clearance decreased as the dosage increased, with terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) values of 4.5-6.5 days. Overall, ongericimab was well tolerated in both studies. A single dose of ongericimab reduced LDL-C levels by 30%-73% in healthy subjects, and repeated doses of ongericimab reduced LDL-C levels by 67%-80% in patients with hypercholesterolemia. At the end of the dosing interval in the phase Ib/II study, over 70% of patients' LDL-C levels decreased by more than 50% from baseline. The results showed that ongericimab had a significant long-acting LDL-C lowering effect with good safety and potential for clinical application.

PHARMACOLOGICAL STRATEGIES TO PREVENT CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of global mortality, and high-risk patients, such as those with a history of myocardial infarction, diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, or severe dyslipidemia, are especially vulnerable to adverse cardiovascular events. Pharmacological strategies aimed at preventing these events in high-risk patients are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with CVDs. These strategies include the use of antiplatelet agents, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and beta-blockers, which have shown efficacy in the secondary prevention of events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. OBJECTIVES: Given the importance of this topic, this study aims to explore the most effective pharmacological strategies to prevent cardiovascular events in patients considered at high risk. The study aims to elucidate the main drugs used, their mechanisms of action, as well as the relevance of their clinical application for the reduction of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in these patients. METHODOLOGY: The study was developed based on an integrative literature review, based on searches in the Virtual Health Library (VHL), PubMed and SciELO databases. The search terms used included: “Cardiovascular prevention”, “High-risk patients”, and “Pharmacological strategies”. Articles published in the last five years were selected to ensure the relevance and timeliness of the information. RESULTS: Pharmacological strategies to prevent cardiovascular events in high-risk patients include the use of antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, which reduces platelet aggregation and prevents arterial thrombosis. Statins, which reduce LDL cholesterol levels, have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. In addition, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers have shown benefits in patients with heart failure and hypertension, reducing cardiovascular mortality. Individualizing treatment, considering the comorbidities and characteristics of each patient, is essential to optimize clinical results. CONCLUSION: Pharmacological strategies play a crucial role in the prevention of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The combination of medications such as antiplatelet agents, statins, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, when applied individually and according to clinical guidelines, can significantly reduce the incidence of serious cardiovascular events. Awareness of the importance of the correct use of these therapies and adherence to treatment are essential to improve the quality of life and increase the longevity of patients.

Efficacy of combination lipid lowering therapy in achieving low density lipoprotein cholesterol targets after one month of event in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Introduction Rapid reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels reduces the risk of recurrent events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with benefits proportional to LDL-C reduction. Early use of combination lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is therefore recommended. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) combined with high-intensity statins (HIS) improve LDL-C goal attainment but are unaffordable for many patients in India and worldwide. Purpose We share our experience with the use of dual RE (rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe) and triple REB (rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe and bempedoic acid) combination LLT in patients admitted with ACS. Methods All ACS patients admitted to our institute over one year (January 2023 to December 2023) were considered in this retrospective analysis. Those with unavailable lipid profile reports, either at the time of ACS or at 1-month follow-up, were excluded. Clinical and laboratory details were obtained from hospital records. The primary objective was to assess the percentage change in LDL-C levels from index event to 4 weeks follow-up. Results A total of 299 patients were included, out of which 60 were on HIS alone, 71 were on RE, and 168 were on REB (Figure). The majority (99%) of patients in the REB group were statin naïve, compared to the other two groups. The baseline mean LDL-C levels at the time of the index event were 95.3+30.5, 103.2+39.6, and 115.6+32.9 mg/dl, respectively (p&amp;lt;0.001) (Table). The mean LDL-C levels at four weeks post-ACS reduced to 52.9+21.2, 45.9+20.5, and 43.7+15.4 mg/dl, respectively (p&amp;lt;0.01). The percentage reduction in LDL-C level was 44.4%, 55.5%, and 62.2%, respectively (p&amp;lt;0.001). REB enabled 70.8% and 95.2% of patients to achieve the Lipid Association of India, and American College of Cardiology recommended LDL-C targets of &amp;lt;50 mg/dl and &amp;lt;70 mg/dl within 4 weeks. These target levels were achieved in 67.6% and 88.7% of patients on the dual RE therapy and 50% and 81.6% of patients, respectively, on HIS alone. Conclusion Our study demonstrates the capacity to rapidly achieve LDL-C goals after ACS with triple REB therapy, an affordable regimen compared to costly PCSK9i therapy.Figure.Lipid lowering strategies usedComparison of study groups

Efficacy of combination therapy with statin and ezetimibe versus high dose statin monotherapy in secondary prevention in high-risk patients

Abstract Background Secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome focuses on lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol below 55 mg/dL. In all statin-naïve patients at high risk (LDL-cholesterol target &amp;lt;55 mg/dL), initiation of high-intensity statin monotherapy is recommended by ESC guidelines. Nonetheless, at one month, a significant proportion of patients do not reach their LDL-cholesterol target. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare lipid-lowering therapy with statin monotherapy versus statin with ezetimibe in secondary prevention in patients at high risk. Methods The current prospective study included 264 consecutive patients admitted with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. None of the patients had taken lipid-lowering drugs in the previous 12 months. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: Group 1 - rosuvastatin 40 mg (n= 144) and Group 2 - rosuvastatin 40 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg (n= 120). All patients' lipid profiles were assessed upon admission and after one month of lipid-lowering treatment. Results At baseline, no patient had LDL cholesterol level lower than 55 mg/dL. There was no significant difference in lipid profile at baseline between the two groups (all p &amp;gt; 0.05). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of baseline LDL-cholesterol deviation from the target (103.4% versus 99.70%; p= 0.66). As expected, the combination therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol at one month significantly higher compared to high-dose statin monotherapy (-59.65% versus -37.54%; p&amp;lt; 0.0001). After one month of treatment, only 47.92% of patients in Group 1 reached the LDL-cholesterol target (&amp;lt;55 mg/dL) compared to 90.00% of the patients in Group 2 (p&amp;lt;0.0001; R.R.= 0.53). Conclusion(s) Our findings show that statin and ezetimibe combination therapy is more effective in reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels and reaching targets compared to statin monotherapy alone. In statin-naïve patients at high risk, early initiation of the statin and ezetimibe combination instead of statin monotherapy should be taken into account in secondary prevention, for an earlier reach of the LDL-cholesterol target and to reduce the overall cardiovascular risk.

Rationale for Early Administration of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) represent a significant global health challenge arising from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels being a primary contributor. Despite standard statin therapy, individuals with ACS remain at high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events, particularly in the initial post-ACS period. Monoclonal antibodies targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), such as evolocumab and alirocumab, offer a potential strategy to reduce LDL-C levels further and mitigate this residual risk. This review delves into the molecular mechanisms, effects on cholesterol metabolism, inflammatory modulation, and clinical outcomes associated with early administration of PCSK9 inhibitors following ACS.

Lomitapide: navigating cardiovascular challenges with innovative therapies.

Dyslipidemia is the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) Secondary dyslipidemia: its treatments and association with atherosclerosis. Glob Health Med, Efficacy and safety of saroglitazar for the management of dyslipidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies. The current treatment strategies for managing dyslipidemia focus on reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to minimize the risks of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction (MI). Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an inherited autosomal dominant disease caused by a mutation in the LDL receptor (LDLr), which can lead to extremely high levels of LDL-C The Beneficial Effect of Lomitapide on the Cardiovascular System in LDLr(-/-) Mice with Obesity, The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide improves vascular function in mice with obesity. Although statin therapy has been the primary treatment for dyslipidemia, HoFH patients do not respond well to statins, requiring alternative therapies. Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibition has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for treating HoFH. MTP is primarily responsible for transferring triglyceride and other lipids into apolipoprotein B (ApoB) during the assembly of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles in the liver. Lomitapide, an inhibitor of MTP, has been approved for treatingof HoFH adults. Unlike statins, lomitapide does not act on the LDLr to reduce cholesterol. Instead, lomitapide lowers the levels of ApoB-containing proteins, primarily VLDL, eventually decreasing LDL-C levels. Studies have shown that lomitapide can reduce LDL-C levels by more than 50% in patients with HoFH who have failed to respond adequately to other treatments. Lowering LDL-C levels is important for preventing atherosclerosis, reducing cardiovascular risk, improving endothelial function, and promoting overall cardiovascular health, especially for patients with HoFH Efficacy and safety of a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study. This review paper focuses on research findings regarding the therapeutic benefits of lomitapide, highlighting its effectiveness in lowering cholesterol levels and reducing the risk of CVDs The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide improves vascular function in mice with obesity.

A register-based cohort study on the effectiveness and Safety of anti-PCSK9 treatment in persons with hyperlipidemia.

Dyslipidemia is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. While statins are the primary treatment, some individuals require additional lipid-lowering therapies, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. Alirocumab and evolocumab have shown efficacy in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) but have not been directly compared in clinical trials. This study aims to assess the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on LDL-C levels and evaluate the impact of a mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab. Taking advantage of the mandated switch in PCSK9 treatment in Denmark, we conducted a register-based cohort study of 907 individuals with dyslipidemia treated with PCSK9 inhibitors in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2016 to 2022. We analyzed LDL-C levels, treatment retention, and MACE, adjusting for variables such as age, sex, dose, and concurrent lipid-lowering medications. We show that PCSK9 inhibitors treatment resulted in a 49% reduction in LDL-C levels. Following a mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab, no significant difference was observed in LDL-C levels or adverse clinical outcomes, including MACE. Treatment discontinuation was most likely within the first 100 days, and no significant difference in discontinuation rates was found between the two drugs. Our study demonstrates that both alirocumab and evolocumab are effective in significantly reducing LDL-C levels in individuals with dyslipidemia. The mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab did not result in significant changes in LDL-C or clinical outcomes, suggesting that these treatments can be used interchangeably. These findings support the clinical equivalence of the two PCSK9 inhibitors and may guide therapeutic decisions in lipid management.

Emerging Lipid-Lowering Therapies: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Agents Targeting Hyperlipidemia

Background: Hyperlipidemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, often necessitating long-term pharmacological intervention to manage cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Traditional treatments, such as statins and niacin, have been effective but are often associated with adverse effects and limited efficacy in certain populations. The development of novel lipid-lowering therapies, targeting specific mechanisms of lipid metabolism, offers new potential for personalized treatment approaches. Methods: This review examines a range of emerging pharmacological therapies for hyperlipidemia, including PCSK9 inhibitors, CETP inhibitors, ACL inhibitors, MTP inhibitors, APOC3 inhibitors, ANGPTL inhibitors, and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs). Each class of drugs was evaluated for its mechanism of action, efficacy in clinical trials, and associated side effects. Relevant clinical studies were analyzed to compare their efficacy in reducing LDL cholesterol, raising HDL cholesterol, and improving overall cardiovascular outcomes. Results and Discussion: PCSK9 inhibitors (Alirocumab and Evolocumab) demonstrated a significant 60% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels and improved cardiovascular outcomes when combined with statins. CETP inhibitors, such as Dalcetrapib, increased HDL cholesterol by 31% without affecting LDL cholesterol levels, while Bempedoic acid, an ACL inhibitor, proved effective in lowering cholesterol and glucose levels, especially in statin-intolerant patients. APOC3 inhibitors (Volanesorsen, Olezarsen) successfully reduced triglyceride levels by inhibiting lipoprotein lipase activity. ASO drugs (Mipomersen, Inclisiran) provided gene-targeted therapy for primary hypercholesterolemia, offering a novel therapeutic avenue. ANGPTL inhibitors impacted triglyceride metabolism, and icosapent ethyl significantly reduced cardiovascular risk in statin-treated individuals. These novel therapies have demonstrated significant reductions in LDL and triglyceride levels while improving HDL cholesterol and reducing cardiovascular risks.

Estimating the effect of inclisiran on hypercholesterolemia and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: the NHANES 1999–2018 study

BackgroundHypercholesterolemia has been identified as an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Inclisiran, an innovative small interfering RNA agent, is anticipated to result in a notable reduction of approximately 50% in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Given its transformative impact, this study scrutinized the eligibility of the US population for inclisiran treatment and evaluated its potential effects on hypercholesterolemia and the primary prevention of CVD.MethodsThis study applied the eligibility criteria from the ORION 10 and 11 trials to the 1999–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset to estimate the size of the eligible population for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and ASCVD-risk equivalents. Utilizing the reduction in LDL-C levels from ORION 10, this study predicted the impact of inclisiran on LDL-C levels among ASCVD patients. Similarly, leveraging the changes in lipid levels from ORION 11, this study predicted inclisiran’s effect on the 10-year change in CVD risk and preventable CVD events in the ASCVD-risk equivalents population, employing the Framingham CVD Risk Score.ResultsThe study identified 579 ASCVD patients (5 million) and 382 ASCVD-risk equivalents (2.66 million) who met the eligibility criteria from ORION 10 and 11. Among the ASCVD population, 3.5 million (70.2%) would achieve a ≥ 50% reduction in LDL-C levels after treatment. Furthermore, 4.6 million (91.3%) would achieve LDL-C levels < 70 mg/dL, and 3.8 million (75%) would achieve LDL-C levels < 55 mg/dL after treatment. For the ASCVD-risk equivalents population, the estimated 10-year CVD risk would decrease from 25.3 to 17.7%, an absolute reduction of 7.6% and a relative reduction of 30% following inclisiran treatment, potentially preventing 202,353 CVD events over a decade, including 138,084 coronary heart disease cases, 37,351 strokes, and 23,894 congestive heart failure cases.ConclusionsInclisiran has the potential to substantially reduce the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and prevent nearly 200,000 CVD events in eligible US adults.

The efficacy and safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors combined with statins in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a network meta-analysis.

In recent years, the position of PCSK9 inhibitors as adjuvant therapy to statins in guidelines has further improved. However, there remained a dearth of direct comparative studies among different PCSK9 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different PCSK9 inhibitors combined with statins. A comprehensive literature search was conducted from the study's inception to 12 November 2023, encompassing multiple online databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov to obtain relevant randomized controlled trials. Frequentist network meta-analysis was employed to compare the efficacy and safety of different PCSK9 inhibitors. The efficacy endpoints were low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). The safety endpoints were any adverse events (AE), severe adverse events (SAE), AE leading to treatment discontinuation, and injection-site reaction. Compared with placebo and ezetimibe, all PCSK9 inhibitors demonstrated significant reductions in LDL-C levels. Notably, evolocumab exhibited the most pronounced effect with a treatment difference of -63.67% (-68.47% to -58.87%) compared with placebo. Regarding dosage selection for evolocumab, the regimen of 140 mg Q2W (-69.13%, -74.55% to -63.72%) was superior to 420 mg QM (-61.51%, -65.97% to -57.05%). Based on rankings and P-scores analysis, tafolecimab 150 mg Q2W demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing ApoB levels (-61.70%, -84.38% to -39.02%) and Lp(a) levels (-43%, 30%, -68%, 81% to -17%, 79%). Furthermore, the safety profile of PCSK9 inhibitors was favorable with no increase in the incidence of AE, SAE, or AE leading to treatment discontinuation; however, alirocumab, inclisiran, and tafolecimab may potentially entail a potential risk associated with injection-site reactions. Compared with placebo and ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors can significantly reduce LDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a) when combined with statins to treat hypercholesterolemia. Furthermore, PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe exhibit similar safety profiles. [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42023490506].

Gene Mutation in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Response to Alirocumab Treatment-A Single-Centre Analysis.

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by significantly elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, which plays a major role in the progression of atherosclerosis and leads to a heightened risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods: We have carried out an observational study on a group of 17 patients treated at the Outpatient Lipid Clinic from 2019 to 2024. Result: The most frequent mutation observed was found in the LDL receptor (LDLR) gene, which was identified in ten patients (58.8%). Five patients were identified to have a mutation in the apolipoprotein B (APOB) gene, whereas two patients had two points mutations, one in the LDLR, and the other in the APOB gene. The average age of patients with LDLR mutation was 54.8 (12.3); for APOB mutation it was 61.4 (9.3) and for patients with two points mutation it was 61.5 (14.8). The study results showed that at Week 12, individuals with LDLR-defective heterozygotes who were given alirocumab 150 mg every two weeks experienced a 63.0% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels. On the other hand, individuals with APOB heterozygotes experienced a 59% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels. However, in patients with double heterozygous for mutations in LDLR and APOB genes, there was a hyporesponsiveness to alirocumab, and the reduction in LDL-C was only by 23% in two individuals. Conclusions: In patients with a single mutation, there was a greater response to treatment with alirocumab in contrast to patients with double heterozygous mutation, who did not respond to treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors.

Addition of Bempedoic Acid to Statin-Ezetimibe versus Statin Titration in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk: A Single-Centre Prospective Study.

Reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) below recommended thresholds is a core component of cardiovascular prevention strategies. We hypothesized that the addition of bempedoic acid to patients already on statin-ezetimibe therapy was more effective than titrating the statin dose in reducing LDL-C. The study enrolled 120 patients at high cardiovascular risk and with LDL-C above 70 mg/dL. They were randomly divided into two groups: the bempedoic acid (BA) group, taking bempedoic acid in addition to statin plus ezitimibe, and the statin titration (ST) group, including patients who doubled the dose of statin. At 12 weeks, the BA group presented a more significant decrease in LDL-C compared to the ST group (-22.9% vs. 7.5% p 0.002). The total cholesterol decreased significantly in the BA group compared to ST (-14.8% vs.-4.7%; p 0.013) No significant between-group changes in HDL and triglycerides occurred. At 12 weeks, the number of patients who reached LDL-C lower than 70 mg/dL was 38 (63%) in the BA group versus 22 (37%) in the ST group (between groups, p 0.034). In the BA group, the LDL-lowering effect of bempedoic acid was similar between patients taking atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. No side effects occurred during the follow up period. In conclusion, the addition of bempedoic acid to statin-ezetimibe combined treatment was more effective than doubling the dose of statin in reducing LDL-C levels and increased the number of patients reaching the LDL-C goal.

Characteristics of Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Belgium and Current Treatment Patterns for the Management of Elevated LDL-C Levels.

Dyslipidemia remains the major cause of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Lipid management in patients with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk needs improvement across Europe, and data gaps are noticeable at the country level. We described the current treatment landscape in Belgium, hypothesizing that lipid management in patients with ASCVD remains inadequate and aiming to understand the reasons. Using data from an anonymized primary care database in Belgium derived from 494 750 individuals, we identified those with any CV risk factor between November 2019 and October 2022 and described the clinical features of patients with ASCVD. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients (i) receiving lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), (ii) per low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) threshold, stratified per LLT, (iii) reaching the 2021 ESC recommended LDL-C goals, and (iv) LDL-C reduction per type of LLT was also determined. Among 40 888 patients with very high CV risk, 24 859 had established ASCVD. Most patients with ASCVD were either receiving monotherapy (59.6%) or had no documented LLT (25.1%). Further, 64.2% of those with no documented LLT exhibited LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL. Among common treatment options, one of the greatest improvements in LDL-C levels was achieved with combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe, reducing LDL-C levels by 41.5% (p < 0.0001). Yet, in this group, 24.8% of patients had still LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL and only 20.7% were at goal. Our study emphasizes the importance of developing strategies to help patients achieve their LDL-C goals, with a focus on supporting the implementation of combination LLT in routine clinical practice.

RNA interference therapy in cardiology: will new targets improve therapeutic goals?

The discovery of RNA interference in 1998 opened avenues for the manipulation of gene expression, leading to the development of small interfering RNA (siRNA) drugs. Patisiran, the first FDA-approved siRNA medication, targets hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Givosiran, lumasiran and nedosiran further expand siRNA applications in treating rare genetic diseases, demonstrating positive outcomes. In cardiology, inclisiran, approved for hypercholesterolaemia, showcases sustained reductions in LDL cholesterol levels. However, ongoing research aims to establish its impact on cardiovascular outcomes. Lipoprotein(a), an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, has become a focus of siRNA therapies, precipitating the development of specific siRNA drugs like olpasiran, zerlasiran and lepodisiran, with promising reductions in lipoprotein(a) levels. Research to assess the effectiveness of these medications in reducing events is currently under way. Zodasiran and plozasiran address potential risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, targeting triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Zilebesiran, which targets hepatic angiotensinogen mRNA, has demonstrated a dose-related reduction in serum angiotensinogen levels, thereby lowering blood pressure in patients with systemic arterial hypertension. The evolving siRNA methodology presents a promising future in cardiology, with ongoing studies assessing its effectiveness in various conditions. In the future, larger studies will provide insights into improvements in cardiovascular outcomes, long-term safety and broader applications in the general population. This review highlights the historical timeline of the development of siRNA-based drugs, their clinical indications, potential side-effects and future perspectives.

Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Overweight, and Poor Sleep Quality in Commercial Airline Pilots: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of premature career termination in commercial airline pilots (APs). In this cross-sectional study, we sought to investigate the relationship between intima-media thickness (IMT), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular risk factors in APs, focusing on overweight status and sleep quality. Methods A total of 140 male APs were categorized into four groups based on body mass index (BMI) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score: overweight poor sleepers (OW-PS), overweight good sleepers (OW-GS), normal weight poor sleepers (NW-PS), and normal weight good sleepers (NW-GS). IMT was quantified in the common carotid artery (CCA) and carotid bulb using ultrasound, yielding a composite IMT (IMTcom) measure. Common cardiovascular risk factors were assessed in all participants. Results The prevalence of overweight and poor sleep quality was 43.6% and 32.9%, respectively. The OW-PS group had significantly higher age, heart rate, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol compared to other groups (p<0.05). Overweight pilots, regardless of sleep quality, had increased IMTcom compared to normal-weight pilots (p<0.001). Age and LDL cholesterol were independent predictors of IMTcom in the OW-PS and OW-GS groups (p<0.05). Conclusions Overweight status, irrespective of sleep quality, is associated with increased IMT in APs, suggesting a higher burden of subclinical atherosclerosis. Interventions focused on reducing LDL cholesterol levels and managing age-related cardiovascular risk factors could be advantageous in mitigating the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease in overweight pilots.