SIXTEEN governors spoke this year in their state-of-the-state addresses about early learning issues. And many of them focused on the issues surrounding kindergarten. Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano looked for creative solutions to funding problems: must tackle the root problems of Arizona's illiteracy, which has led to chronic academic underperformance and a shameful dropout rate. The more we learn about the importance of early childhood learning, the more obvious it is that voluntary all-day kindergarten and universal pre-K should be standard offerings in our public schools. . . . Our current budget crisis should not deter us from moving forward with voluntary all-day kindergarten. My administration is already exploring ways we can use private/public partnerships to provide the funding to phase in all-day kindergarten. Gov. Ronnie Musgrove of Mississippi focused on the good outcomes of kindergarten and sought some flexibility in meeting children's needs: In 1982, kindergarten became a cornerstone of the Education Reform Act. In 2003, I want to take it to the next step. The Summer Start program would bring the kids to the classroom two months before, and continuing two months after, their kindergarten year. Taught by qualified kindergarten teachers, this program would give our kids a running start for the schoolhouse door. Summer Start will reduce dropout rates, increase the skills of our future workforce, and ultimately save the state millions. Giving our children the opportunity to succeed -- giving them a good education -- still remains the best hope for lifting us to greater heights. Gov. Kenny Guinn of Nevada put it this way: We need to create a generation of young Nevadans with stronger, sharper, and more sophisticated skills. Therefore, I propose that we start at the beginning by providing full-day kindergarten for our children. These and other comments by governors on early education can be found on the Education Commission of the States website at www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/42/51/4251.doc. State Policy Research Kristie Kauerz, Jessica McMaken, and Michael Griffith, who are policy researchers at the Education Commission of the States, contend that giving districts the same amount of funding regardless of whether they provide full- or half-day kindergarten in effect creates a disincentive to offer full-day programs. After all, why should a district choose to offer the more expensive full-day program when it can offer a half-day program for the same amount of money? Here are two conclusions from their research, which was funded by a grant from the Foundation for Child Development: * Seven states provide an incentive to districts to offer full-day kindergarten instead of half-day. These states are Alaska, Georgia, Illinois, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. These states provide a higher level of funding for full-day kindergarten than for half-day kindergarten. In six of these states, the level provided for full-day kindergarten is the same as that provided for first grade. In Georgia, the level of funding for full-day kindergarten is even higher than that provided for first grade. * Nineteen states provide a disincentive to districts to offer full-day kindergarten. These states are Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. In most of these states there is no difference in the funding provided for full-day kindergarten and for half-day kindergarten. However, in Colorado, New Hampshire, and New Jersey, additional categorical funding for full-day kindergarten programs is offered in some districts or for some children (typically low-income children). Kauerz, McMaken, and Griffith also found that the cutoff dates for entering kindergarten are far from uniform across states. …
Read full abstract