Reduced Abuse Potential Research Articles

Novel Opioids in the Setting of Acute Postoperative Pain: A Narrative Review.

Although traditional opioids such as morphine and oxycodone are commonly used in the management of acute postoperative pain, novel opioids may play a role as alternatives that provide potent pain relief while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action, findings from preclinical studies and clinical trials, and potential advantages of several novel opioids. The more established include oliceridine (biased ligand activity to activate analgesia and downregulate opioid-related adverse events), tapentadol (mu-opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), and cebranopadol (mu-opioid agonist with nociceptin opioid peptide activity)-all of which have demonstrated success in the clinical setting when compared to traditional opioids. On the other hand, dinalbuphine sebacate (DNS; semi-synthetic mu partial antagonist and kappa agonist), dual enkephalinase inhibitors (STR-324, PL37, and PL265), and endomorphin-1 analog (CYT-1010) have shown good efficacy in preclinical studies with future plans for clinical trials. Rather than relying solely on mu-opioid receptor agonism to relieve pain and risk opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), novel opioids make use of alternative mechanisms of action to treat pain while maintaining a safer side-effect profile, such as lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression as well as reduced abuse potential.

Contingent administration of typical and biased kappa opioid agonists reduces cocaine and oxycodone choice in a drug vs. food choice procedure in male rhesus monkeys.

Combinations of mu and kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists have been proposed as analgesic formulations with reduced abuse potential. The feasibility of this approach has been increased by the development of KOR agonists with biased signaling profiles that produce KOR-typical antinociception with fewer KOR-typical side effects. The present study determined if the biased KOR agonists, nalfurafine and triazole 1.1, could reduce choice for oxycodone in rhesus monkeys as effectively as the typical KOR agonist, salvinorin A. Adult male rhesus monkeys (N = 5) responded under a concurrent schedule of food delivery and intravenous cocaine injections (0.018mg/kg/injection). Once trained, cocaine (0.018mg/kg/injection) or oxycodone (0.0056mg/kg/injection) was tested alone or in combination with contingent injections of salvinorin A (0.1-3.2µg/kg/injection), nalfurafine (0.0032-0.1µg/kg/injection), triazole 1.1 (3.2-100.0µg/kg/injection), or vehicle. In each condition, the cocaine or oxycodone dose, as well as the food amount, was held constant across choice components, while the dose of the KOR agonist was increased across choice components. Cocaine and oxycodone were chosen over food on more than 80% of trials when administered alone or contingently with vehicle. When KOR agonists were administered contingently with either cocaine or oxycodone, drug choice decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Salvinorin A and triazole 1.1 decreased drug-reinforcer choice without altering total trials completed (i.e., choice allocation shifted to food), while nalfurafine dose dependently decreased total trials completed. These results demonstrate that salvinorin A and triazole 1.1, but not nalfurafine, selectively reduce cocaine and oxycodone self-administration independent of nonspecific effects on behavior, suggesting that G-protein bias does not appear to be a moderating factor in this outcome. Triazole 1.1 represents an important prototypical compound for developing novel KOR agonists as deterrents for prescription opioid abuse.

Paroxetine increases delta opioid responsiveness in sensory neurons.

There are currently no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved δ-opioid receptor (DOR)-selective agonists, despite having fewer side effects in rodents and nonhuman primates compared with traditional μ-opioid receptor (MOR) therapeutics (Vanderah, 2010). Targeting peripheral receptors is an attractive strategy to reduce abuse potential. However, peripheral opioid receptors do not readily respond to agonists unless primed by inflammation, which would limit their efficacy in noninflammatory pain patients (Stein et al., 1989). It was recently identified that G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) maintains DOR incompetence in noninflamed nociceptors (Brackley et al., 2016, 2017). Here, we report that paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and potent GRK2 inhibitor (Thal et al., 2012), reduces chronic GRK2 association with membrane DOR, thereby enhancing peripheral DOR-mediated analgesic competence in the absence of inflammation. Interestingly, paroxetine’s effects on GRK2 in vivo are limited to peripheral tissues in the male rat. The effects of paroxetine on DOR competence are notably antagonized by GRK2 overexpression. This is the first study to suggest that paroxetine induces peripheral DOR analgesic competence through a GRK2-dependent mechanism, improving analgesic efficacy in noninflamed tissue. Because paroxetine targets the protein that governs peripheral opioid receptor responsiveness, and does so in the absence of inflammation, we propose that paroxetine may be suitable as a co-therapy with peripherally-restrictive doses of opioids to improve analgesic efficacy in noninflammatory pain conditions.

Preclinical discovery and development of oliceridine (Olinvyk®) for the treatment of post-operative pain

ABSTRACT Introduction Opioids acting at the MOP (mu:µ) receptor produce analgesia but also side effects. There is debate suggesting opioid receptors produce analgesia via G-protein and side-effects via β-arrestin-2 pathways. Opioids targeting G-proteins over the arrestins (bias) offer potential therapeutic advantages. Oliceridine is a putative MOP, G-protein biased agonist. Areas Covered Oliceridine is selective for MOP receptors with greater activity at G-proteins over arrestins. A substantial body of evidence now points to a simpler pharmacological descriptor of partial agonist. Preclinical in vivo data indicates a robust antinociceptive response of shorter duration than morphine. Apollo trials (Phase-III RCT-bunionectomy/abdominoplasty) describe good analgesic efficacy that was non-inferior to morphine with good tolerability and side-effect profile. There is evidence for an improved respiratory safety profile. Oliceridine is approved by the FDA. Expert Opinion Oliceridine will be an important addition to the clinical armamentarium for use for the management of acute pain severe enough to require an intravenous opioid analgesic and for whom alternative treatments are inadequate. Respiratory advantage and the possibility of reduced abuse potential are possible advantages over the use of traditional opioids. Based on a number of excellent, highly detailed studies, oliceridine should be described as a partial agonist; this ‘label’ does not matter.

Current status of opioid addiction treatment and related preclinical research.

Opioid use disorders (OUDs) are diseases of the brain with behavioral, psychological, neurobiological, and medical manifestations. Vulnerability to OUDs can be affected by factors such as genetic background, environment, stress, and prolonged exposure to μ-opioid agonists for analgesia. Two standard-of-care maintenance medications, methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone, have a long-term positive influence on health of persons with opioid addiction. Buprenorphine and another medication, naltrexone, have also been approved for administration as monthly depot injections. However, neither medication is used as widely as needed, due largely to stigma, insufficient medical education or training, inadequate resources, and inadequate access to treatment. Ongoing directions in the field include (i) personalized approaches leveraging genetic factors for prediction of OUD vulnerability and prognosis, or for targeted pharmacotherapy, and (ii) development of novel analgesic medicines with new neurobiological targets with reduced abuse potential, reduced toxicity, and improved effectiveness, especially for chronic pain states other than cancer pain.

β-Fluorofentanyls Are pH-Sensitive Mu Opioid Receptor Agonists.

The concept recently postulated by Stein and co-workers (Science 2017, 355, 966) that mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists possessing amines with attenuated basicity show pH-dependent activity and can selectively act at damaged, low pH tissues has been additionally supported by in vitro studies reported here. We synthesized and tested analogs of fentanyl possessing one or two fluorine atoms at the beta position of the phenethylamine side chain, with additional fluorines optionally added to the benzene ring of the side chain. These compounds were synthesized in 1 to 3 steps from commercial building blocks. The novel bis-fluorinated analog RR-49 showed superior pH sensitivity, with full efficacy relative to DAMGO, but with 19-fold higher potency (IC50) in a MOR cAMP assay at pH 6.5 versus 7.4. Such compounds hold significant promise as analgesics for inflammatory pain with reduced abuse potential.

A nasal abuse potential randomized clinical trial of REMOXY® ER, a high-viscosity extended-release oxycodone formulation.

This study examined the nasal abuse deterrence of REMOXY ER, a novel high-viscosity extended-release oxycodone formulation. An Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo, and active-controlled, four-way crossover study of intranasal REMOXY ER gel, manipulated or intact, and ground oxycodone immediate-release (IR). An open label extension examined pharmacokinetics of OxyContin® ER in the first 20 subjects. Healthy, adult nondependent recreational opioid users with a history of intranasal abuse. Thirty-eight subjects enrolled; 36 completed. A clinical research in-patient unit. Cross-over arms included nasal self-administration of the entire contents of REMOXY ER 40 mg capsules (manipulated or intact), ground oxycodone IR 40 mg tablets, and placebo. The open-label arm was ground OxyContin ER. The primary endpoint was the maximum effect (Emax) of visual analog scale ratings of Drug Liking. Secondary endpoints included Take Drug Again (12 and 24 hours), Drug High Emax, area under effect curves through 12 hours, pupillometry, peak oxycodone concentrations (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), and Abuse Quotient (Cmax/Tmax). Intranasal REMOXY ER (manipulated or intact) elicited lower Drug Liking and Drug High compared to ground oxycodone IR. Secondary endpoints also reflected reduced Abuse Potential. Intranasal REMOXY ER (manipulated or intact) led to fourfold lower Cmax, a 57 to 128 percent longer Tmax, a >10-fold lower Abuse Quotient and lower Take Drug Again scores compared to both OxyContin ER and oxycodone IR. In this study, REMOXY ER demonstrated significantly lower nasal abuse potential compared to oxycodone IR or OxyContin ER. Abuse-deterrent drugs are intended to help fight opioid abuse. Yet the persistence of the opioid epidemic indicates that vast improvements in abuse-deterrent technology are needed. A new, high-viscosity, extended-release oxycodone formulation showed robust abuse-deterrence against the nasal route of abuse in an Food and Drug Administration-advised clinical trial in recreational opioid users.

The G-protein biased mu-opioid agonist, TRV130, produces reinforcing and antinociceptive effects that are comparable to oxycodone in rats

Mu-opioid agonists (e.g., oxycodone) are highly effective therapeutics for pain. However, they also produce reinforcing effects that increase their likelihood of abuse. Recent strategies in drug development have focused on opioids with biased receptor-signaling profiles that favor activation of specific intracellular pathways over others with the aim of increasing therapeutic selectivity. TRV130, a mu agonist biased towards G-protein signaling, produces antinociceptive effects comparable to the mu agonist, morphine, but exhibits reduced side effects. However, in terms of abuse potential, we know of no published preclinical data investigating the effects of TRV130 as a reinforcer. In the present study, we assessed the relative reinforcing effects of TRV130 and oxycodone, a commonly-prescribed mu agonist, in rats self-administering the drugs under a progressive-ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement. In addition, we assessed the relative potency and efficacy of TRV130 and oxycodone in rats in a test of thermal antinociception (Hot Plate). For self-administration, male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 7) self-administered intravenous infusions of TRV130 or oxycodone (0.01-0.32 mg/kg/inj) under a PR schedule of reinforcement. For the Hot-Plate test, male rats (n = 7) received subcutaneous injections of TRV130 (0.1–3.2 mg/kg/inj) or oxycodone (0.1–5.6 mg/kg/inj), and nociceptive response latencies were measured. TRV130 and oxycodone were equi-potent and equi-effective in self-administration and thermal antinociception. This study demonstrates that TRV130 produces reinforcing and antinociceptive effects that are quantitatively similar to oxycodone, and that a biased-signaling profile does not necessarily reduce abuse potential.

Kappa opioid receptor antagonism: Are opioids the answer for treatment resistant depression?

Introduction:Past trials of buprenorphine (BUP) in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) have displayed favorable results, although its clinical utility was limited by the risk of abuse or physical dependence. By combining BUP with samidorphan (SAM), the euphoric high is negated by an opposing mechanism, which theoretically reduces addictive-like properties while allowing the antidepressant properties to remain. As such, the objective of this article is to analyze the results of BUP/SAM premarketing clinical trials as adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant MDD.Methods:A comprehensive PubMed/MEDLINE search was conducted through November 9, 2017, using the following search terms: depression, samidorphan, buprenorphine, ALKS-5461. Additional data were obtained from Clinicaltrials.gov and resources included in the present study. All English-language clinical trials evaluating the combination of BUP/SAM in the treatment of MDD were included.Results:A few premarketing studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of BUP/SAM combination as adjunctive treatment in patients with treatment-resistant MDD. The FORWARD-1 through FORWARD-5 trials concluded (1) the most effective dosing ratio of BUP/SAM to reduce abuse potential was 1:1; (2) statistically significant changes in scores from baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale were noted for the 2 mg/2 mg dose compared with placebo; and (3) the most commonly reported adverse effects were nausea, dizziness, and fatigue.Discussion:Buprenorphine/samidorphan has shown favorable results for efficacy and tolerability in premarketing studies evaluating its use as adjunctive therapy for treatment-resistant MDD. Its novel mechanism targeting the opioid pathway may serve as a promising antidepressant devoid of abuse potential.

Effects of N-Alkyl-4-Methylamphetamine Optical Isomers on Plasma Membrane Monoamine Transporters and Abuse-Related Behavior.

4-Methylamphetamine (4-MA) is an emerging drug of abuse that acts as a substrate at plasma membrane transporters for dopamine (DAT), norepinephrine (NET), and serotonin (SERT), thereby causing nonexocytotic release of monoamine transmitters via reverse transport. Prior studies by us showed that increasing the N-alkyl chain length of N-substituted 4-MA analogues converts 4-MA from a transportable substrate (i.e., releaser) at DAT and NET to a nontransported blocker at these sites. Here, we studied the effects of the individual optical isomers of N-methyl-, N-ethyl-, and N- n-propyl 4-MA on monoamine transporters and abuse-related behavior in rats because action/function might be related to stereochemistry. Uptake inhibition and release assays were conducted in rat brain synaptosomes whereas electrophysiological assessments of drug-transporter interactions were examined using cell-based biosensors. Intracranial-self-stimulation in rats was employed to assess abuse potential in vivo. The experimental evidence demonstrates that S(+) N-methyl 4-MA is a potent and efficacious releaser at DAT, NET, and SERT with the highest abuse potential among the test drugs, whereas R(-) N-methyl 4-MA is a less potent releaser with reduced abuse potential. The S(+)ethyl analogue has decreased efficacy as a releaser at DAT but retains full release activity at NET and SERT with a reduction in abuse-related effects; the R(-)ethyl analogue has a similar profile but is less potent. S(+) N-Propyl 4-MA is a nontransported blocker at DAT and NET but an efficacious releaser at SERT, whereas the R enantiomer is almost inactive. In conclusion, the S enantiomers of the N-alkyl 4-MA analogues are most potent. Lengthening the N-alkyl chain converts compounds from potent nonselective releasers showing abuse-related effects to more selective SERT releasers with no apparent abuse potential.

NKTR-181: A Novel Mu-Opioid Analgesic with Inherently Low Abuse Potential

The increasing availability of prescription opioid analgesics for the treatment of pain has been paralleled by an epidemic of opioid misuse, diversion, and overdose. The development of abuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs) of conventional opioids such as oxycodone and morphine represents an advance in the field and has had a positive but insufficient impact, as most opioids are still prescribed in highly abusable, non-ADF forms, and abusers can tamper with ADF medications to liberate the abusable opioid within. The abuse liability of mu-opioid agonists appears to be dependent on their rapid rate of entry into the central nervous system (CNS), whereas analgesic activity appears to be a function of CNS exposure alone, suggesting that a new opioid agonist with an inherently low rate of influx across the blood-brain barrier could mediate analgesia with low abuse liability, regardless of formulation or route of administration. NKTR-181 is a novel, long-acting, selective mu-opioid agonist with structural properties that reduce its rate of entry across the blood-brain barrier compared with traditional mu-opioid agonists. NKTR-181 demonstrated maximum analgesic activity comparable to that of oxycodone in hot-plate latency and acetic-acid writhing models. NKTR-181 was distinguishable from oxycodone by its reduced abuse potential in self-administration and progressive-ratio break point models, with behavioral effects similar to those of saline, as well as reduced CNS side effects as measured by the modified Irwin test. The in vitro and in vivo studies presented here demonstrate that NKTR-181 is the first selective mu-opioid agonist to combine analgesic efficacy and reduced abuse liability through the alteration of brain-entry kinetics.

The opioid receptor triple agonist DPI-125 produces analgesia with less respiratory depression and reduced abuse liability

Opioid analgesics remain the first choice for the treatment of moderate to severe pain, but they are also notorious for their respiratory depression and addictive effects. This study focused on the pharmacology of a novel opioid receptor mixed agonist DPI-125 and attempted to elucidate the relationship between the δ-, μ- and κ-receptor potency ratio and respiratory depression and abuse liability. Five diarylmethylpiperazine compounds (DPI-125, DPI-3290, DPI-130, KUST202 and KUST13T02) were selected for this study. PKA fluorescence redistribution assays in CHO cells individually expressing δ-, μ- or κ-receptors were used to measure the agonist potency. The respiratory safety profiles were estimated in rats by the ratio of ED50 (pCO2 increase)/ED50 (antinociception). The abuse liability of DPI-125 was evaluated with a self-administration model in rhesus monkeys. The observed agonist potencies of DPI-125 for δ-, μ- and κ-opioid receptors were 4.29±0.36, 11.10±3.04, and 16.57±4.14 nmol/L, respectively. The other four compounds were also mixed agonists with varying potencies. DPI-125 exhibited a high respiratory safety profile, clearly related to its high δ-receptor potency. The ratio of the EC50 potencies for the μ- and δ-receptors was found to be positively correlated with the respiratory safety ratio. DPI-125 has similar potencies for μ- and κ-receptors, which is likely the reason for its reduced abuse potential. Our results demonstrate that the opioid receptor mixed agonist DPI-125 is safer and less addictive than traditional μ-agonist analgesics. These findings suggest that the development of δ>μ∼κ opioid receptor mixed agonists is feasible, and such compounds could represent a promising class of potent analgesics with wider therapeutic windows.

New Formulations of Methylphenidate for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Tolerability.

Psychostimulants are the recommended first-line pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methylphenidate is one of the most commonly used psychostimulants worldwide. Given that immediate-release and/or tablet/capsule formulations may decrease adherence to methylphenidate treatment, several drug companies have been developing novel long-acting and/or liquid/chewable formulations that may improve adherence as well as (for long-acting formulations) reduce abuse potential, decrease stigma associated with multiple administrations per day, and decrease the potential for adverse effects related to dosage peak. Here, we review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of novel formulations of methylphenidate that are in development or have been approved by the US FDA or European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the last 5years. We searched the websites of the FDA, EMA, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the pertinent drug companies. We also searched PubMed, Ovid databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase+Embase classic), and ISI Web of Knowledge (Web of Science [Science Citation Index Expanded], Biological Abstracts, Biosis, Food Science and Technology Abstracts) to retrieve any additional pertinent information. We found data from trials for the following compounds: (1) methylphenidate extended-release oral suspension (MEROS; NWP06, Quillivant™); (2) methylphenidate extended-release chewable capsules (NWP09, QuilliChew ER™); (3) methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release capsules (Aptensio XR™); (4) methylphenidate extended-release orally disintegrating tablets (XR-ODT; NT-0102, Cotempla™); (5) ORADUR technology (once-daily tamper-resistant formulation) methylphenidate sustained release (SR); and (6) methylphenidate modified-release (HLD-200; Bejorna™). Overall, available evidence based on trials suggests these compounds have good efficacy and tolerability. Future research should further explore the effectiveness and tolerability of these new formulations as well as their potential to improve adherence to treatment in the 'real world' via pragmatic trials.

Safety and tolerability of intranasal cocaine during phendimetrazine maintenance.

Phendimetrazine appears to have limited abuse potential and reduces cocaine self-administration in preclinical studies. No human studies have evaluated the safety and tolerability of cocaine in combination with phendimetrazine, which is a necessary next step in evaluating the efficacy of phendimetrazine for treating cocaine use disorder. This study determined the safety and tolerability of acute cocaine doses during chronic phendimetrazine treatment. Ten subjects completed this within-subject, placebo-controlled, inpatient study. Subjects were maintained on ascending oral phendimetrazine doses (0, 70, 140, and 210mg/day). After at least seven maintenance days at each dose, subjects received ascending doses of intranasal cocaine (0, 10, 20, 40, and 80mg), separated by 90min, within one session. Cocaine produced prototypical cardiovascular and subject-rated effects (e.g., increased blood pressure and ratings of like drug). The cardiovascular effects of cocaine alone were not clinically significant for an acute drug response (e.g., average heart rate did not approach tachycardia, 100beats/min). Phendimetrazine enhanced peak heart rate following placebo and low cocaine doses, but these effects were also not clinically significant. Phendimetrazine was otherwise devoid of effects alone and did not alter the subject-rated effects of cocaine or hypothetical demand for cocaine on a purchase task. Cocaine was safe and well tolerated during maintenance on a threefold range of phendimetrazine doses. Given this safety profile, the reduced abuse potential of phendimetrazine and promising preclinical research, future human laboratory studies, and possibly clinical trials should evaluate the efficacy of phendimetrazine for reducing cocaine use.

Role of phenmetrazine as an active metabolite of phendimetrazine: Evidence from studies of drug discrimination and pharmacokinetics in rhesus monkeys

BackgroundMonoamine releasers such as d-amphetamine that selectively promote release of dopamine/norepinephrine versus serotonin are one class of candidate medications for treating cocaine dependence; however, their clinical utility is limited by undesirable effects such as abuse liability. Clinical utility of these compounds may be increased by development of prodrugs to reduce abuse potential by slowing onset of drug effects. This study examined the behavioral and pharmacokinetic profile of the Schedule III compound phendimetrazine, which may serve as a prodrug for the N-demethylated metabolite and potent dopamine/norepinephrine releaser phenmetrazine. MethodsMonkeys (n=5) were trained in a two-key food-reinforced discrimination procedure to discriminate cocaine (0.32mg/kg, IM) from saline, and the potency and time course of cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects were determined for (+)-phenmetrazine, (−)-phenmetrazine, (+)-phendimetrazine, (−)-phendimetrazine, and (±)-phendimetrazine. Parallel pharmacokinetic studies in the same monkeys examined plasma phenmetrazine and phendimetrazine levels for correlation with cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects. ResultsBoth isomers of phenmetrazine, and the racemate and both isomers of phendimetrazine, produced dose- and time-dependent substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, with greater potency residing in the (+) isomers. In general, plasma phenmetrazine levels increased to similar levels after administration of behaviorally active doses of either phenmetrazine or phendimetrazine. ConclusionsThese results support the hypothesis that phenmetrazine is an active metabolite that contributes to the effects of phendimetrazine. However, behavioral effects of phendimetrazine had a more rapid onset than would have been predicted by phenmetrazine levels alone, suggesting that other mechanisms may also contribute.

Medication Helps Make Therapy Work for Teens Addicted to Prescription Opioids

ALBUQUERQUE—For social workers like Shannon Garrett, MSW, at the Mountain Manor Treatment Center in Baltimore, the greatest challenge in treating young people addicted to prescription opioids may be getting them to therapy in the first place. “No treatment tool can work if a patient doesn’t show up,” said Garrett at the Blending Addiction Science and Practice meeting here in April, organized by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Yet medications, such as buprenorphine, can greatly improve patients’ adherence to treatment. Garrett, who acknowledged that he was initially skeptical of using prescription drugs to treat patients with these addictions, explained that talk and behavioral therapies can do little to ease the symptoms of withdrawal and strong drug craving that often lead patients to relapse to drug use. But buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist often paired with naloxone to reduce abuse potential, has been demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial to increase patient retention and improve outcomes (Woody GE et al. JAMA. 2008;300[17]:2003-2011). Now scientists are working to build on this and other emerging evidence to develop therapies targeted to the unique needs of this patient population. To encourage clinicians to treat youths with opioid addiction, NIDA released a training DVD, Buprenorphine Treatment for Young Adults, at the meeting. Such treatment tools are essential to help the growing numbers of teens and young adults seeking help for prescription opioid addiction, and to reach the tens of thousands who may go untreated. Geetha Subramaniam, MD, of NIDA’s division of clinical neuroscience and behavioral research and a psychiatrist who specializes in treating adolescents with addiction, said that only about 1400 youths aged 12 to 17 years were admitted for treatment of prescription opioid addiction in the United States in 2007, based on data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s Treatment Episode Data Set. These individuals represent a small fraction of the young people who may be addicted to these drugs, based on the widespread nonmedical use of prescription opioids by this patient population, she said. “These patients are going to be coming in your door,” said Subramaniam at the meeting. “You must know how to treat them.”

Safety and Tolerability of the Switch from Buprenorphine to Buprenorphine/Naloxone in an Italian Addiction Treatment Centre

Abuse and misuse of pharmacological therapies represent major challenges in the healthcare system, particularly in patients receiving long-acting opioid drugs for the treatment of heroin or opioid addiction. The partial mu-opioid receptor agonist buprenorphine is used to treat opioid dependence, but diversion and misuse may occur. The sublingual combination formulation of buprenorphine and the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (buprenorphine/naxolone) is associated with a reduced abuse potential, and has been shown to have promising efficacy for the treatment of opioid dependence. This observational study assessed the safety and efficacy of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone combination therapy in patients with opioid dependence after therapeutic switch from buprenorphine monotherapy. A total of 94 patients being treated with buprenorphine monotherapy (average dose 8 mg/day; mean duration of therapy 840 days) were switched to buprenorphine/naloxone combination therapy. Patients were asked to rate their level of satisfaction with buprenorphine/naloxone combination treatment with respect to the management of withdrawal symptoms, and urinary toxicology tests were carried out before and 14 days after switching to combination therapy. Within 3 months, 75/94 patients (80%) previously treated with buprenorphine monotherapy had switched to sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone combination treatment (average dose buprenorphine 8 mg). Among patients receiving combination treatment for >3 months, 83% were receiving medication either weekly or fortnightly, based on the results of toxicological testing. A reduction in positive urinary toxicology tests was observed in patients within two weeks after being switched to combination treatment (before switch: 28, 9 and 2 positive tests for heroin, cocaine and heroin + cocaine, respectively vs 11, 3 and 1 after switch) and a total of 64 patients of the 75 who switched to combination therapy (85%) were satisfied with the management of withdrawal symptoms during buprenorphine/naloxone treatment. Few adverse events were reported and no patients dropped out of treatment. This study shows that switching from buprenorphine monotherapy to sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone combination therapy is effective and well tolerated, and associated with good control of withdrawal symptoms in the majority of patients. In addition, combination therapy reduced illicit drug use (based on negative urinary toxicology texts) and allowed the time between clinic visits to be increased.

Safety and Efficacy of Buprenorphine/Naloxone in Opioid-Dependent Patients

Opioid dependence is a growing problem. Methadone is an established agent for the treatment of opioid dependence, but there is a risk of this agent being abused, a potential for interaction with antiretroviral agents and a risk of cardiac toxicity. Another option is the partial mu-opioid receptor opioid agonist buprenorphine, which has been used successfully to manage opioid dependence. While the risk of abuse is lower than that for methadone, there is still a risk. The sublingual combination formulation of buprenorphine and the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (buprenorphine/naxolone) is a newer agent with reduced abuse potential, and has been shown to have promising efficacy for opioid dependence. We describe the results of an observational study investigating the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine/naloxone in opioid-dependent patients. A total of 77 patients were included and were switched from buprenorphine to sublingual tables of buprenorphine/naloxone; the buprenorphine dosage was titrated to achieve good control of withdrawal symptoms. The prevalence of withdrawal symptoms, craving, constipation, cramps, insomnia, sexual activity, depression, sweating, distress, bone/joint pain and drowsiness were compared over the first 30 days of treatment (period 1) and the total 120-day study duration (period 2). The average buprenorphine/naloxone dose in period 1 was 7.3 mg/day and 12.7 mg/day in period 2. Most patients did not experience any withdrawal symptoms in either period 1 or period 2. Fewer than 20% of patients experienced any cravings over the 120-day study period. Importantly, the adverse effects observed were usually mild, with very few patients experiencing significant adverse effects. This study shows that buprenorphine/naloxone is an effective and well tolerated treatment for opioid withdrawal when the dosage is titrated to achieve good control of withdrawal symptoms. Switching from buprenorphine alone to buprenorphine/naloxone was possible with very little discomfort for the patient and effective retained patients in treatment.

Lisdexamfetamine

Lisdexamfetamine is an amphetamine prodrug, comprising an l-lysine amino acid covalently bonded to dextroamphetamine (d-amphetamine). Lisdexamfetamine is approved in the US for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children aged 6-12 years. Lisdexamfetamine is a therapeutically inactive molecule. After oral ingestion, lisdexamfetamine is hydrolyzed to l-lysine, a naturally occurring essential amino acid, and active d-amphetamine, which is responsible for the activity of the drug. In a well designed pharmacodynamic study in adult stimulant abusers, 50 or 100 mg doses of oral lisdexamfetamine had less likability than d-amphetamine 40 mg, suggesting a reduced abuse potential. Through rate-limited hydrolysis in the body, l-lysine is cleaved, gradually releasing pharmacologically active d-amphetamine. The pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine suggest a reduced potential for abuse. In two well designed trials in children aged 6-12 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the efficacy of lisdexamfetamine was superior to that of placebo in improving symptoms associated with ADHD. Adverse events with lisdexamfetamine were, in general, mild to moderate in severity and consistent with those commonly reported with amphetamine.

A slow-onset, long-duration indanamine monoamine reuptake inhibitor as a potential maintenance pharmacotherapy for psychostimulant abuse: Effects in laboratory rat models relating to addiction

Slow-onset, long-lasting dopamine reuptake blockers with reduced abuse potential have been suggested as maintenance therapies for cocaine addiction. We have synthesized a series of 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1-indanamine monoamine reuptake inhibitors as candidates for such maintenance pharmacotherapy. The initial lead compound, the N, N-dimethyl analogue 30,640 was then subjected to testing in addiction-relevant animal models. Compound 30,640 (2 mg/kg i.p.) produced a pronounced slow-onset, long-lasting increase (300–400%) in extracellular nucleus accumbens dopamine levels, as measured by in vivo brain microdialysis in awake laboratory rats. Slow-onset, long-lasting decreases (40–80%) in the dopamine metabolites 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid, and the serotonin metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid were also seen. Compound 30,640 (3 or 5 mg/kg i.p.) also produced a significant (∼30%) slow-onset, long-lasting enhancement of electrical brain-stimulation reward, which was additive with that of cocaine (5 mg/kg i.p.). When given to cocaine-administering rats, 30,640 (2.5, 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg i.p.) significantly inhibited (30–60%) intravenous cocaine self-administration, with a pronounced long-lasting profile. In sum, 30,640 showed cocaine-like effects, but with a marked slow-onset, long-lasting profile. We conclude that the prodrug strategy employed in the design of 30,640 achieved its goal. We suggest that such compounds may be useful as maintenance pharmacotherapies for psychostimulant addiction.