Reduction In Cardiovascular Disease Events Research Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Salt Substitution and Antihypertensive Drug Treatment in Chinese Prehypertensive Adults.

Recent guidelines recommend antihypertensive drug treatment for prehypertensive individuals with blood pressure between 130/80 and 139/89 mm Hg. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of 3 interventions in Chinese prehypertensive adults: salt substitution, antihypertensive drug treatment, and their combination. We developed a Markov cohort model to estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a lifetime. Data from the China Kadoorie Biobank informed the simulation. Costs and utilities were drawn from published sources. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of salt substitution alone, antihypertensive drug treatment alone, and a combination of the 2, focusing on the overall prehypertensive population, those at high CVD risk, and different starting ages (40, 50, 60, and 70 years). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated per QALY gained. Salt substitution at age 40 years is the only cost-effective strategy for prehypertensive individuals, with an ICER of $6413.62/QALY. For those at high CVD risk, the combination intervention starting at age 40 years is most cost-effective, with an ICER of $2913.30/QALY. Interventions initiated at younger ages yielded greater CVD reductions and lower ICERs. For example, a combined intervention at age 40 years reduces CVD events by 5.3% with an ICER of $2913.30/QALY, compared with 4.9% and $32 635.33/QALY at age 70 years. These results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. In China, replacing usual salt with a salt substitute is more cost-effective than treating prehypertensive individuals over the age of 40 years with antihypertensive drugs. Furthermore, starting intervention at a younger age in prehypertensive adults can result in even greater cost savings.

Impact of cognitive behavioural therapy on neural, inflammatory, & autonomic markers in a sample with PTSD and cardiovascular risk: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

ABSTRACT Background: Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are at heightened risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population. Inflammation and autonomic dysfunction are candidate mechanisms of CVD risk in PTSD; however, these mechanisms have not been well-characterised in the PTSD-CVD link. Further, these mechanisms may operate through altered stress-related neural activity (SNA). Yet, it remains unknown if changes in PTSD are associated with changes in CVD risk mechanisms. Objective: This manuscript describes the design and procedures of a pilot randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a first-line treatment for PTSD (Cognitive Processing Therapy; CPT) versus waitlist control on mechanisms of CVD risk. Further, this study will test the hypothesis that CPT reduces CVD risk through its effects on inflammation and autonomic function and that these changes are driven by changes in SNA. Methods: Adults with PTSD and CVD risk (N = 30) will be randomised to CPT or waitlist control. Participants complete two laboratory visits (baseline and post-treatment) that include surveys, brain and peripheral imaging via 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and resting measures of autonomic function. Primary outcomes include arterial inflammation and heart rate variability. Secondary outcomes include leukopoiesis (bone marrow uptake), heart rate, and blood pressure. The indirect effects of PTSD treatment on changes in inflammation and autonomic function through SNA will also be examined. Conclusions: This study seeks to characterise candidate neuroimmune mechanisms of the PTSD-CVD link to identify treatment targets and develop personalised interventions to reduce CVD events in PTSD populations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06429293..

Long-term lipoprotein apheresis reduces cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with isolated lipoprotein(a) elevation

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). To date, the only approved treatment to lower Lp(a) is lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Previous studies have demonstrated that LA is effective in reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and/or Lp(a). Here we report our long-term experience with LA and its effectiveness in reducing CVD events in patients with elevated Lp(a). This retrospective open-label, single-center study included 25 individuals with Lp(a) elevation >60 mg/dL and LDL-C < 2.59 mmol/L who had indication for LA. The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of any CV event (determined by medical records) after initiation of LA. Mean LA treatment duration was 7.1 years (min-max: 1-19 years). Median Lp(a) was reduced from 95.0 to 31.1 mg/dL after LA (-67.3 %, p < 0.0001). Mean LDL-C was reduced from 1.85 to 0.76 mmol/L after LA (-58.9 %, p < 0.0001). Prior LA, 81 CV events occurred in total (0.87 events/patient/year). During LA, 49 CV events occurred in total (0.24 events/patient/year; -0.63, p = 0.001). Yearly major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was reduced from 0.34 to 0.006 (-0.33, p = 0.0002). Similar results were obtained when considering only individuals with baseline LDL-C below 1.42 mmol/L. In this observational study of a heterogeneous CV high-risk cohort with elevated Lp(a), LA reduced Lp(a) levels and was paralleled by a decrease in CV events and MACE. We recommend LA for patients with high Lp(a) who still have CV events despite optimal lipid-lowering medication and lifestyle changes.

Pemafibrate and other triglyceride-lowering therapies to reduce risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease.

Although high triglycerides are consistently associated with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), therapies that reduce triglyceride levels have inconsistently translated into reduced CVD risk. To date, three clinical trials have tested triglyceride-lowering therapies in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) and elevated risk of incident/recurrent CVD. In REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial), assignment to IPE, a highly purified eicosapentanoic acid (EPA), resulted in a 25% reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction), nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death, coronary revascularization and hospitalization for unstable angina. By contrast, the combination of EPA and docosahexanoic acid (DHA) carboxylic fatty acids used in the STRENGTH trial (Statin Residual Risk With Epanova in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia) failed to reduce CVD risk. Most recently, PROMINENT (Pemafibrate to Reduce Cardiovascular Outcomes by Reducing Triglycerides in Patients with Diabetes) also failed to demonstrate reduction in CVD events despite use of a potent triglyceride-lowering, fibric-acid derivative. However, improvement in HTG-associated metabolic complications (e.g. nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) was observed with pemafibrate as well as with another potent triglyceride-lowering therapy (i.e. pegozafermin). Moreover, trials are underway evaluating whether the most fatal metabolic complication of HTG, pancreatitis, may be reduced with highly potent triglyceride-lowering therapies (e.g. apolipoprotein C3 inhibitors). Taken together, HTG is associated with increased risk of CVD and attendant adverse metabolic sequalae. To this end, a potentially promising and evidence-based landscape is emerging for treating a clinical phenotype that in the past has been insufficiently addressed.

Blood pressure status, trajectories and cardiovascular disease: the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus prospective study

BackgroundHigh blood pressure (BP) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Adequate treatment of high BP should reduce the risk of CVD, but this association has seldom been...

Cost-effectiveness of applying high-sensitivity troponin I to a score for cardiovascular risk prediction in asymptomatic population.

Risk stratification scores such as the European Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) are used to guide individuals on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Adding high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) to such risk scores has the potential to improve accuracy of CVD prediction. We investigated how applying hsTnI in addition to SCORE may impact management, outcome, and cost-effectiveness. Characteristics of 72,190 apparently healthy individuals from the Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe (BiomarCaRE) project were included into a discrete-event simulation comparing two strategies for assessing CVD risk. The standard strategy reflecting current practice employed SCORE (SCORE); the alternative strategy involved adding hsTnI information for further stratifying SCORE risk categories (S-SCORE). Individuals were followed over ten years from baseline examination to CVD event, death or end of follow-up. The model tracked the occurrence of events and calculated direct costs of screening, prevention, and treatment from a European health system perspective. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in € per quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) gained during 10 years of follow-up. Outputs were validated against observed rates, and results were tested in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. S-SCORE yielded a change in management for 10.0% of individuals, and a reduction in CVD events (4.85% vs. 5.38%, p<0.001) and mortality (6.80% vs. 7.04%, p<0.001). S-SCORE led to 23 (95%CI: 20-26) additional event-free years and 7 (95%CI: 5-9) additional QALYs per 1,000 subjects screened, and resulted in a relative risk reduction for CVD of 9.9% (95%CI: 7.3-13.5%) with a number needed to screen to prevent one event of 183 (95%CI: 172 to 203). S-SCORE increased costs per subject by 187€ (95%CI: 177 € to 196 €), leading to an ICER of 27,440€/QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis was performed with eligibility for treatment being the most sensitive. Adding a person's hsTnI value to SCORE can impact clinical decision making and eventually improves QALYs and is cost-effective compared to CVD prevention strategies using SCORE alone. Stratifying SCORE risk classes for hsTnI would likely offer cost-effective alternatives, particularly when targeting higher risk groups.

Saturated Fat Intake and the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: An Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States and globally and is largely attributable to atherosclerosis. Evidence indicates that multiple dietary components contribute to the complex causes of CVD and associated events and mortality. Public health authorities and scientific organizations have recommended reduced saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake for decades to promote cardiovascular health, which is linked to favorable impacts on established and emerging atherosclerotic CVD risk factors. Recently, a debate has emerged about whether SFA intake should be reduced for CVD prevention, which has contributed to confusion among health care professionals, including registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs), and the general public, and necessitates the critical evaluation of the evidence. The objective of this evidence-based nutrition practice guideline is to provide health care and public health professionals, particularly RDNs, with evidence-based recommendations on how to address SFA intake in adults within an individualized healthy dietary pattern. Moderate evidence supports the reduction of SFA intake for CVD event reduction, low- to moderate-certainty evidence supports prioritization of replacement of SFAs with polyunsaturated fatty acids, and low-certainty evidence supports focusing on reducing the total amount of SFA rather than specific food sources of SFA. Guideline implementation should include consideration of individual preferences; principles of inclusion, diversity, equity, and access; and potential nutritional deficiencies that may occur with reduced SFA intake. Future research is needed to address gaps that were identified and provide high-quality evidence to support stronger future recommendations based on the relationship between SFA and CVD.

Abstract 13519: US Population Eligibility and Estimated Impact of Tirzepatide on Obesity Prevalence and Preventable Cardiovascular Disease Events in US Adults

Background: Tirzepatide, a novel GIP-GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy, has been shown to be beneficial for weight loss and reduction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in adults with obesity in the SURMOUNT-1 trial. We estimated US population eligibility for tirzepatide and the impact on reduction of CVD events in US adults with obesity. Methods: We applied SURMOUNT-1 eligibility criteria (body mass index [BMI] &gt; 30 kg/m 2 or BMI &gt; 27 kg/m 2 with at least one risk factor or CVD, excluding diabetes) to US adults aged &gt; 18 years in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2018 to estimate the US eligible population using NHANES sample weighting. Tirzepatide 15 mg group weight changes in the SURMOUNT-1 trial were applied to estimate the population impact on weight and obesity, and in those aged 30 to 74 years without prior CVD, the estimated 10-year CVD risks utilizing the BMI-based Framingham CVD risk scores. The difference in the estimated risks with and without tirzepatide “treatment” multiplied by the eligible weighted population represented the estimated “preventable” CVD events. Results: We identified 4015 US adults weighted to an estimated population size of 93.4 million [M] (38% of the US adult population) who fit SURMOUNT-1 trial eligibility criteria, of which 51% were female and 89% were without prior CVD. Applying tirzepatide 15 mg SURMOUNT-1 treatment effects on weight loss resulted in an estimated 70.6% (65.9 M) and 56.7% (53.0 M) showing &gt; 15% and &gt; 20% weight reductions, respectively, translating to a 58.8% (55.0 M) reduction in obesity (BMI &gt; 30 kg/m 2 ) prevalence and 36.4% (34.0 M) increase in normal weight (BMI &lt;25 kg/m 2 ) prevalence among the eligible population. Among those without CVD, estimated 10-year CVD risks were 10.1% “before” and 7.8% “after” tirzepatide “treatment” reflecting a 2.3% absolute (and 23% relative) risk reduction (number needed to treat [NNT]=43) translating to an estimated 1.95 million preventable CVD events over 10 years. Conclusions: Tirzepatide treatment in eligible US adults may reduce obesity prevalence nearly 60% representing 55M adults and prevent up to 2M CVD events over 10 years, suggesting a dramatic impact on societal burden and healthcare costs in those with these conditions.

Comparing dietary strategies to manage cardiovascular risk in primary care: a narrative review of systematic reviews.

Nutrition care in general practice is crucial for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and management, although comparison between dietary strategies is lacking. To compare the best available (most recent, relevant, and high-quality) evidence for six dietary strategies that are effective for primary prevention/absolute risk reduction of CVD. A pragmatic narrative review of systematic reviews of randomised trials focused on primary prevention of cardiovascular events. Studies about: 1) adults without a history of cardiovascular events; 2) target dietary strategies postulated to reduce CVD risk; and 3) direct cardiovascular or all-cause mortality outcomes were included. Six dietary strategies were examined: energy deficit, Mediterranean-like diet, sodium reduction (salt reduction and substitution), the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, alcohol reduction, and fish/fish oil consumption. Reviews were selected based on quality, recency, and relevance. Quality and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Twenty-five reviews met inclusion criteria; eight were selected as the highest quality, recent, and relevant. Three dietary strategies showed modest, significant reductions in cardiovascular events: energy deficit (relative risk reduction [RRR] 30%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 13 to 43), Mediterranean-like diet (RRR 40%, 95% CI = 20 to 55), and salt substitution (RRR 30%, 95% CI = 7 to 48). Still, some caveats remain on the effectiveness of these dietary strategies. Salt reduction, DASH diet, and alcohol reduction showed small, significant reductions in blood pressure, but no reduction in cardiovascular events. Fish/fish oil consumption showed little or no effect; supplementation of fish oil alone showed small reductions in CVD events. For primary prevention, energy deficit, Mediterranean-like diets, and sodium substitution have modest evidence for risk reduction of CVD events. Strategies incorporated into clinical nutrition care should ensure guidance is person centred and tailored to clinical circumstances.

Fibrates, Hypertriglyceridemia, and CVD Risk: Where Do We Stand After the PROMINENT Trial for Triglyceride Lowering?

To evaluate recent clinical trials focusing on patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Randomized clinical trials have recently been undertaken in hypertriglyceridemic patients to determine whether effective reductions in triglycerides would improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. However, the fibric acid derivative, pemafibrate, failed to reduce cardiovascular events despite significant reductions (~ 25-35%) in triglyceride levels and despite background statin therapy. In contrast, icosapent ethyl, a highly purified omega-3 fatty acid was previously shown to reduce CVD events in hypertriglyceridemic patients, despite more modest reductions (~ 20%) in triglyceride levels in statin treated patients. The divergent results obtained in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), a group at particularly high risk of CVD, especially when coupled with other risk factors, indicates that triglyceride lowering in of itself is insufficient to offset CVD risk. Rather, the effectiveness of therapy in this high-risk cohort may be the result of the suppression of the inherent atherogenic properties associated with HTG.

Triglyceride-lowering therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular events, stroke, and mortality in patients with diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background and aimsTriglyceride (TG)-lowering therapy is efficient for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population; however, for diabetic individuals, it is more controversial. The purpose of this study was to pool the results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to clarify whether the lowering of TG is beneficial for the prevention of CVD events, stroke, and mortality in subjects with diabetes. MethodsMEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were searched to identify the relevant literature. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the association of triglyceride-lowering therapy with the prevention of CVD events, stroke, and mortality in diabetic patients. ResultsOverall, 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control groups, TG lowering was associated with a decreased risk of CVD events (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.87–0.95, p = 0.000) and CVD mortality (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.86–1.00, p = 0.047). There was no significant correlation between TG-lowering therapy and the incidence of stroke and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.86–1.02, p = 0.129 and RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.93–1.01, p = 0.107, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that the decreased CVD risk resulting from TG-lowering therapy was independent of age, sex, region, duration of follow-up, degree of TG reduction and glycemic control. ConclusionsTG-lowering therapy is associated with a reduction in CVD events and cardiovascular-specific mortality, but not in stroke and all-cause mortality. Future large, multicenter RCTs will further confirm these conclusions.

Examining the Use of a Polypill in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a significant cause of death worldwide. To address the global burden of CVD and its risk factors, the polypill, an all-in-one therapy that combines multiple existing medications for preventing CVD and reducing CVD events (such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, beta-blocker, statin, or aspirin) into a single combination pill, has emerged as a potential strategy to improve CVD prevention. Clinical trials on the polypill have found that polypill use is associated with significant reductions in CVD events and risk factors in both patients with established CVD and at risk of developing CVD, suggesting a potential benefit in primary and secondary CVD prevention. The polypill has also been demonstrated to be a cost-effective therapy that may potentially increase treatment accessibility, affordability, and availability particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Further, patients on polypill therapy have shown high rates of treatment compliance, with significant improvements in medication adherence for patients with low baseline compliance. Given its potential advantages and benefits, the polypill may become a promising therapy for the prevention of CVD.

Reduction in cardiovascular disease events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor versus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor: A real-world retrospective administrative database analysis in Japan

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the benefit of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without a CVD history.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Japanese hospital administrative data from the Medical Data Vision database (January 2015 to April 2020). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=625,739) who were new users of an SGLT2i (n=57,070; 9.1%) or DPP4i (n=568,669; 90.9%) were included. Outcomes included hospitalization for heart failure (hHF), all-cause death (ACD) and the composite of hHF or ACD. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the inverse probability weighting Cox proportional hazards model to compare CVD event risks between treatment groups.RESULTS: Compared with DPP4i, SGLT2i was associated with a significant reduction in hHF risk among patients without a CVD history (HR 0.507, 95% confidence interval 0.283–0.907), but not in the full cohort or those with a CVD history. SGLT2i was associated with a significant risk reduction of ACD (HR 0.592, 95% confidence interval 0.481–0.729) and the composite of hHF or ACD (HR 0.712, 95% confidence interval 0.613–0.826), compared with DPP4i in the full cohort; similar results were observed among patients with and without a CVD history.CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, SGLT2i versus DPP4i was associated with a significant reduction in hHF, ACD and hHF or ACD events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without a CVD history.

Can lipophilic pollutants in adipose tissue explain weight change-related risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Can lipophilic pollutants in adipose tissue explain weight change-related risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Medical Telemonitoring for the Management of Hypertension in Older Patients in Japan.

Hypertension is the most frequent modifiable risk factor associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Even in older people, strict blood pressure (BP) control has been recommended to reduce CVD event risks. However, caution should be exercised since older hypertensive patients have increased physical vulnerability due to frailty and multimorbidity, and older patients eligible for clinical trials may not represent the general population. Medical telemonitoring systems, which enable us to monitor a patient's medical condition remotely through digital communication, have become much more prevalent since the coronavirus pandemic. Among various physiological parameters, BP monitoring is well-suited to the use of such systems, which enable healthcare providers to deliver accurate and safe BP management, even in the presence of frailty and/or living in geographically remote areas. Furthermore, medical telemonitoring systems could help reduce nonadherence to antihypertensive medications and clinical inertia, and also enable multi-professional team-based management of hypertension. However, the implementation of medical telemonitoring systems in clinical practice is not easy, and substantial barriers, including the development of user-friendly devices, integration with existing clinical systems, data security, and cost of implementation and maintenance, need to be overcome. In this review, we focus on the potential of medical telemonitoring for the management of hypertension in older people in Japan.

HDL Functions—Current Status and Future Perspectives

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in Western countries. A low HDL-C is associated with the development of CVD. However, recent epidemiology studies have shown U-shaped curves between HDL-C and CVD mortality, with paradoxically increased CVD mortality in patients with extremely high HDL-C levels. Furthermore, HDL-C raising therapy using nicotinic acids or CETP inhibitors mostly failed to reduce CVD events. Based on this background, HDL functions rather than HDL-C could be a novel biomarker; research on the clinical utility of HDL functionality is ongoing. In this review, we summarize the current status of HDL functions and their future perspectives from the findings of basic research and clinical trials.

ACTING EARLY TO PROTECT RENAL: BEYOND GLYCEMIC CONTROL OF SGLT2 INHIBITORS

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD), accounting for almost half of all cases of kidney failure that necessitate replacement therapy. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in patients with T2DM and CKD. To lower blood glucose levels by inhibiting glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) were developed. Consistent reductions in risks for secondary kidney disease end points (albuminuria and a composite of serum creatinine doubling or 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, kidney failure, or death) were recognized in clinical trials designed to demonstrate the CVD safety of SGLT2i in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), as well as reductions in CVD events. The DECLARE-TIMI58 (Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 58, or DECLARE) trial in patients with T2DM, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio &gt;300 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 established the kidney and CVD benefits of dapagliflozin in patients with CKD. SGLT2i boost glomerular hemodynamic function and are figured to augment other local and systemic processes that contribute to the development of CKD and CVD. According to latest Indonesian Society of Endocrinologist’s guideline, patients with T2DM was recommended to use SGLT2i to reduce their risk of CKD and CVD, in accordance with the clinical trial entry criteria. To achieve widespread use of these life-saving medications, effective implementation strategies are required.

Abstract 15672: Cost-Effectiveness of Team-Based Care for Hypertension

Introduction: Team-based care (TBC), typically involving a physician and non-physician working in collaboration, is more effective than usual physician-only care in reducing blood pressure (BP). This analysis estimated the cost-effectiveness of TBC strategies vs. usual care over 10 years. Methods: We used the Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Policy Model to project long-term BP, CVD events, and survival in a nationally representative cohort of 10,000 US adults (aged ≥20 years) with uncontrolled BP (≥140/90 mmHg) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We compared (1) usual care, (2) TBC with a registered nurse providing hypertension counseling, and (3) TBC with a pharmacist providing counseling and titrating medications. BP reductions with TBC were derived from meta-analysis; other inputs were derived from published literature and publicly available data. TBC interventions were simulated to last six months, after which individuals were assumed to return to usual care. The outcomes were mean per-patient direct healthcare costs (2021 USD), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from a US healthcare sector perspective. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of TBC program design and hypertension care process parameters on the cost-effectiveness of TBC. Results: The mean (SD) age was 59.8 (16.6) years, 50.0% were female, and mean baseline systolic BP was 150.9 (14.2) mmHg. At 10 years, TBC with nurse counseling and with pharmacist titration were projected to result in mean (95% uncertainty interval) 0.6-mmHg (0.4, 0.8) and 2.8-mmHg (2.2, 3.4) greater reductions in systolic BP. Both TBC strategies were estimated to dominate (i.e., cost less and more effective) usual care, with nurse counseling projected to cost -$617 (-$1539, $364) and with pharmacist titration -$416 (-$1400, $470) less than usual care. Compared with TBC with nurse counseling, TBC with pharmacist titration had an ICER of $13,000/QALY gained (88.0% probability ICER &lt;$50,000/QALY gained). The ICER was most sensitive to the probability of pharmacist medication intensification. Conclusions: TBC with pharmacist titration is a cost-effective strategy to reduce CVD events in US adults with uncontrolled hypertension.

Atherogenic Lipoproteins for the Statin Residual Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by the use of statins cause a significant reduction in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, one of our previous studies showed that, among eight RCTs that investigated the effect of statins vs. a placebo on CVD development, 56-79% of patients had residual CVD risk after the trials. In three RCTs that investigated the effect of a high dose vs. a usual dose of statins on CVD development, 78-87% of patients in the high-dose statin arms still had residual CVD risk. The risk of CVD development remains even when statins are used to strongly reduce LDL-C, and this type of risk is now regarded as statin residual CVD risk. Our study shows that elevated triglyceride (TG) levels, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and the existence of obesity/insulin resistance and diabetes may be important metabolic factors that determine statin residual CVD risk. Here, we discuss atherogenic lipoproteins that were not investigated in such RCTs, such as lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), remnant lipoproteins, malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL), and small-dense LDL (Sd-LDL). Lp(a) is under strong genetic control by apolipoprotein (a), which is an LPA gene locus. Variations in the LPA gene account for 91% of the variability in the plasma concentration of Lp(a). A meta-analysis showed that genetic variations at the LPA locus are associated with CVD events during statin therapy, independent of the extent of LDL lowering, providing support for exploring strategies targeting circulating concentrations of Lp(a) to reduce CVD events in patients receiving statins. Remnant lipoproteins and small-dense LDL are highly associated with high TG levels, low HDL-C, and obesity/insulin resistance. MDA-LDL is a representative form of oxidized LDL and plays important roles in the formation and development of the primary lesions of atherosclerosis. MDA-LDL levels were higher in CVD patients and diabetic patients than in the control subjects. Furthermore, we demonstrated the atherogenic properties of such lipoproteins and their association with CVD as well as therapeutic approaches.

Cardiovascular Disease Assessment Prior to Kidney Transplantation.

Cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent and the leading cause of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, and kidney transplantation. However, kidney transplantation offers improved survival and quality of life, with an overall reduction in cardiovascular disease events; therefore, it remains the optimal treatment choice for those with advanced kidney disease. Pretransplantation cardiovascular assessment is performed prior to wait-listing and at routine intervals with the principal goal of screening for asymptomatic cardiac disease, intervening when necessary to improve long-term patient and allograft survival. Current clinical practice guidelines are based on expert opinion, with a lack of high-quality evidence to guide standardized screening practices. Recent studies support de-escalation in screening with avoidance of preemptive revascularization in asymptomatic patients, but they fail to provide clear guidance on how best to assess the cardiovascular fitness of this high-risk group. Herein we summarize current practice guidelines, discuss key study findings, highlight the role of optimal medical therapy, and evaluate future directions for cardiovascular disease assessment in this population.