Hammett took murder out of the Venetian vase and dropped it into the alley. Raymond Chandler 234 In 1941 Howard Haycraft wrote a literary history called Murder for Pleasure: Life and Times of the Detective Story. In it he celebrated what he termed the Golden Age of Detective Fiction, and he singled out certain people as masters of the classic detective story--Christie, Sayers, and Bentley, among others. In December 1944, in an essay in the Atlantic Monthly called. The Simple Art of Murder, Raymond Chandler issued a broadside against Haycraft's primarily British tradition. This narrative form, Chandler claimed, fails to provide, among other things, lively characters, sharp dialogue, a sense of pace and an acute use of observed detail (225). murders in these stories are implausibly motivated, the plots completely artificial, and the characters pathetically two-dimensional, puppets and cardboard lovers and papier mache villains and detectives of exquisite and impossible gentility (232). authors of this are ignorant of the facts of (228), too little aware of what goes on i n the (231). As the last quotes suggest, Chandler accusing the writers of Haycraft's Golden Age of failing to be true to the world: if the writers of this wrote about the kind of murders that happen, he says, would also have to write about the authentic flavor of life as it lived (231). Chandler goes on to single out Dashiell Hammett as the person who rescued the genre by bringing it back to the world. Hammett, he says, tried to write realistic mystery fiction (233). John Cawelti, a leading critic of detective fiction, qualifies Chandler's claims, insisting that Hammett's novels are not necessarily more realistic. Rather, they embody a vision of life in the hard-boiled detective formula (163). Another critic remarks that Hammett adapted to the genre a new and more exciting set of literary conventions better suited to the time and (Porter 130). While I grant that Chandler's arguments are partisan and naive, and that Hammett's realism every bit as conventional as Christie's, [1] I would like to take Chandler at his word and to investigate the real of Hammett's and, by extension, the world of American detective fiction. By looking closely at Hammett's fiction, especially Red Harvest, his first novel (1929), I propose to demonstrate that his powerful vision of derives in large part from his subversion of basic frames of intelligibility, including the frame that allows the art of fiction, language itself. Chandler uses the synecdoche mean to define Hammett's world, and various critics have characterized those streets in some detail. [2] world implied in Hammett's works, and fully articulated in Chandler and MacDonald, says George Grella, is an urban chaos, devoid of spiritual and moral values, pervaded by viciousness and random savagely (110). world of Red Harvest representative. novel takes place in a western mining town named Personville, which has been owned for 40 years by an industrial capitalist: Elihu Willson was Personville, and he was almost the whole state (9). Willson controls congressmen, city officials, and the police, but at the opening of the novel, his control of the town in jeopardy. In order to break a strike by the mineworkers, he called in thugs connected with the mob. After brutally suppressing the strike, the gangsters refused to leave and took over the town, occupying its offices and businesses. At the time of the Continental Op's arrival, an uneasy pea ce prevails in a thoroughly corrupt town, as rival gangster factions run different operations. police are bought off casually; they even supply getaway cars for criminals. At one point in the narrative, criminals are let out of jail in order to commit a midday bank robbery; they later use their incarceration as an unimpeachable alibi. …
Read full abstract