Recurrent Noninfectious Uveitis Research Articles

The effectiveness of the 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide implant in treating non-infectious posterior uveitis: a real-world experience

BackgroundThe 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant (ILUVIEN) has been approved for prevention of relapse in recurrent non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye (NIU-PS). There is little data assessing the long-term efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in this indication. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective interventional case review of 18 eyes from 13 patients with NIU-PS treated with the FAc implant at three ophthalmology departments in the Middle East between 2018 and 2021.Main textBaseline patient characteristics, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and intraocular pressure (IOP), were collected at the time of FAc implant administration and at 1–3 months, 6 months and every six months thereafter. The mean time of follow-up was 29.7 ± 14.6 (mean ± SD) months. Over the follow-up, the BCVA significantly increased from month 1 (P = 0.002) until month 36 (P = 0.024) and remained improving throughout the follow-up period (P = 0.004). The CRT significantly decreased from month 1 (P = 0.008) until month 12 (P = 0.003) and was persistently lower during the follow-up period (P = 0.022). Significant improvements in anterior chamber cells (P = 0.004) and vitritis scores (P = 0.001) were observed by Month 6. Similarly, at Month 12, significant improvements were noted in both parameters as well (anterior chamber cells: P = 0.012; vitritis scores: P = 0.004). Mean IOP remained relatively stable throughout (P = 0.205) the follow-up.ConclusionsOur results suggest improvements and long-term maintenance in functional and anatomical outcomes with FAc implant with a manageable safety profile in a real-world clinical setting in patients with NIU-PS.

Rise of biologics in noninfectious uveitis: a retrospective cohort study from Nepal.

A retrospective review of all cases of noninfectious uveitis and scleritis presenting to our center from July 2019 to January 2021 and had been treated with biological therapy were included. We included 12 eyes of 10 patients. The mean age was 42.10±9.71 years. Anterior nongranulomatous uveitis comprised 70% of the cases and the most common etiology of anterior uveitis was spondyloarthritis (seven cases among which five cases were nonradiographic) axial spondyloarthritis (human leukocyte antigen B27 positive) followed by radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (two cases). The first line of treatment in all cases was conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic agents among which 50% (n=5) had received methotrexate (≥15mg/week). As a second line of treatment, one or more biologics was used. Majority of the patients received oral tofacitinib 50% (n=5) followed by Inj adalimumab 30% (n=3). One case of Behcet's disease required sequential biologics (Inj adalimumab followed by oral tofacitinib). All patients tolerated and responded well to the treatment and no recurrences were observed after discontinuation of biologics drugs during the follow-up period of 1 year. Biologics are a relatively safe and effective modality of treatment in refractory, recurrent noninfectious uveitis.

Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant for Treating Recurrent Non-infectious Uveitis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited Alimera Sciences, the company manufacturing fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (FAc) 0.19 mg (tradename ILUVIEN®), to submit evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of FAc for treating recurrent non-infectious uveitis. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre + , was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper contains a summary of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence submitted by the company, the ERG’s critique on the submitted evidence, and the guidance issued by the NICE Appraisal Committee (AC). The company submission (CS) was mainly informed by the PSV-FAI-001 trial in which FAc was compared with (limited) current practice [(L)CP], which was not considered to be representative of UK clinical practice by the ERG. There was no comparison of FAc to any treatment listed in the final scope, and especially to the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (dexamethasone), which was considered to be a relevant comparator by the AC. The primary outcome of the PSV-FAI-001 was recurrence of uveitis in the treated eye. Most of the events for the primary outcome were imputed during the PSV-FAI-001 trial, which probably led to an overestimation of the number of recurrences of disease, and a biased estimate of the relative effectiveness of FAc versus (L)CP. Finally, the place of FAc in the treatment pathway was not clearly defined by the company. Substantial uncertainty surrounded the cost-effectiveness results due to the shortcomings of the clinical evidence. Additionally, the quality of life of patients was not measured during the PSV-FAI-001 trial and long-term effectiveness data of FAc were lacking. The ERG adjusted several issues identified in the CS and added dexamethasone as a comparator in the decision analytic model. The ERG presented multiple analyses as base-cases because several elements of the assessment remained uncertain. The fully incremental ERG results ranged from dexamethasone (extendedly) dominating FAc (when assuming a hazard ratio of 1 or 0.7 for dexamethasone versus FAc) to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £30,153 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for FAc versus (L)CP [when assuming a hazard ratio of 0.456 for dexamethasone versus (L)CP]. The ICER of FAc versus (L)CP ranged from £12,325 to £30,153 per QALY gained. After a second AC meeting where alternative company scenarios comparing FAc with dexamethasone were considered by the AC, the AC concluded that “the results of the company’s analyses ranged from the fluocinolone acetonide implant being dominant (that is, it was more effective and costs less), to an ICER of £29,461 per QALY gained, and most of the ICERs were below £20,000 per QALY gained”. Therefore, the AC recommended FAc as a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources for treating recurrent non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye in the final TA590 guidance (published July 2019).

Adalimumab for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis: an updated review

ABSTRACTIntroduction: The recent approval of adalimumab (trade name Humira, Abbvie inc.) by the FDA for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate, posterior and panuveitis marks the first ‘on label’ non-corticosteroid drug available to ophthalmologists. Immunomodulatory (IMT) and biologic agents have long been shown to be effective in inducing remission of chronic uveitis but have remained as orphan drugs due to lack of financial incentive and perceived need.Areas covered: Here we provide detail into the background and use of adalimumab for uveitic patients. Topics include pharmacology, therapeutic indications and usage, dosage, drug safety, physician monitoring, side effects and adverse events.Expert opinion: We see the approval of adalimumab for uveitis as an important milestone improving upon the accepted standards of care for patients with this severe, sight threatening disease. We implore medical professionals to consider the use of IMT and biologic treatments for patients with recurrent non-infectious uveitis, referring to ocular immunology and uveitis specialists when necessary.

The Use of Ozurdex (Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant) During Anterior Segment Surgery in Patients with Chronic Recurrent Uveitis

To describe the outcomes of concurrent Ozurdex implantation during anterior segment surgery in patients with chronic recurrent uveitis. Retrospective chart review. Data recorded from preoperative and 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative visits included visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, and clinical examination findings of inflammation. Twelve patients (12 eyes) with chronic, recurrent noninfectious uveitis undergoing cataract extraction (n=9) or intraocular lens (IOL) explantation (n=3) were included. Mean duration of follow-up after Ozurdex implantation was 12.9 months. There was a significant reduction (n=10, P=0.02) in the average number of inflammation recurrences 6 months before surgery compared to 6 months after surgery with Ozurdex in affected eyes. IOP remained stable in the postoperative period. One patient undergoing anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) explantation experienced migration of Ozurdex into the anterior chamber resulting in corneal edema that resolved after 1 month. Ozurdex safely and effectively controlled postoperative inflammation in eyes with chronic recurrent uveitis when concurrently implanted during anterior segment surgery in our patients. Caution should be exercised in cases of IOL explantation, as Ozurdex use is now contraindicated in eyes with posterior capsule rupture and ACIOLs.

Patterns of Exacerbations of Chronic Non-Infectious Uveitis in Pregnancy and Puerperium

Purpose: To determine patterns of exacerbations of recurrent non-infectious uveitis during pregnancy and puerperium. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: The medical records of 32 women with a history of chronic non-infectious uveitis, who were pregnant during their follow-up at the Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Service of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, from 1983 through 2003, were reviewed. The uveitis relapse rate during pregnancy was compared to the relapse rate during pregnancy-free periods in these women and to the relapse rate in a control group of women of childbearing age with recurrent non-infectious uveitis. Results: Among the 32 women who were pregnant during follow-up (40 pregnancies), the rate of flare-ups during pregnancy (1.0 recurrence per year) was lower than that observed during non-pregnant periods (2.4 per year; p < 0.001) and lower than that observed in the non-pregnant control group (3.1 per year; p < 0.001). Flare-ups were most frequent in the first trimester of pregnancy and decreased markedly in the second and third trimesters (2.3, 0.5, and 0.4 recurrences per year, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Pregnancy is associated with lower numbers of flare-ups of non-infectious uveitis compared to the non-pregnant state. If flare-ups do occur during pregnancy, they happen predominantly in the first trimester.