The influence of the neurochronaxic theory of phonation of the French physiologist Raoul Husson (1901–1967) on the development of research on voice formation in the Soviet Union, mainly in the 1950–1970s, is discussed. Husson contrasted the neurochronaxic theory with the traditional myoelastic theory of voice formation. The myoelastic theory considers the vocal folds as a self-oscillatory system. Vibrations are caused by the energy of the air flow. According to Husson’s concept, vibrations of the vocal cords do not depend on subglottic pressure. The frequency of vibration of the vocal cords corresponds to the frequency of impulses arriving along the recurrent nerve. To explain the high frequency of vibration of the vocal cords, Husson used Wever’s “Volley Principle”. According to this principle, the activity of each subsequent nerve fiber occurs during the refractory phase of the previous fiber. The responses of all nerve fibers are summed up into a common high-frequency oscillation. In 1950–1970s, Soviet physiologists took an active part in testing the new concept proposed by Husson. They came to the conclusion that both mechanisms, myoelastic and neurochronaxic, are involved in the functioning of the vocal apparatus. But the recurrent nerve does not directly control the vibrations of the vocal cords, but indirectly. Žhinkin called this control system the “code principle,” when a command is sent to the vocal cords to change their physical characteristics, changing the properties of the self-oscillating system.
Read full abstract