Epiretinal Membrane Recurrence Research Articles

Visual outcomes and complications of combined versus sequential pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification for epiretinal membrane.

Symptomatic epiretinal membrane (ERM) often requires surgical intervention via pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), for which cataract development is a common complication. There is insufficient data on the visual outcomes and complications of combined phacovitrectomy (COMB) in comparison to sequential PPV with deferred cataract surgery (SEQ) for ERM. A retrospective dataset analysis of 8 National Health Service ophthalmology departments. The main outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity (VA), operative complications, postoperative cystoid macular oedema (CMO) and recurrent ERM. We included 898 and 299 eyes in the COMB and SEQ groups, respectively. Both procedures resulted in significantly better VA across all follow-up intervals (24 weeks). The proportion of eyes with Snellen VA of at least 20/40 at 12-24 weeks was comparable in both groups (47.8% [COMB] vs. 54.7% [SEQ], p = 0.4456). More eyes in the COMB group experienced posterior capsular rupture (2.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.0009) and iatrogenic retinal trauma (2.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.0023). However, regression analysis revealed that combined surgery did not predict either complication. There were no significant differences in the rates of CMO (6.5% [COMB] vs. 9% [SEQ], p = 0.1522) and recurrent ERM (2.1% [COMB] vs. 3.3% [SEQ], p = 0.2758) between both groups. Both combined and sequential procedures are comparably effective and safe means for managing eyes with ERM.

Pars Plana Vitrectomy with or without Internal Limiting Membrane Peel for Epiretinal Membrane: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The safety and effectiveness of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling remains poorly understood for the treatment of epiretinal membrane (ERM). Objectives: Our study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PPV with and without ILM peeling for ERM. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2023 for comparative studies reporting visual and anatomical outcomes for patients with ERM that received PPV with or without ILM peeling. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at last study observation and change in BCVA from baseline. Secondary outcomes included retinal thickness (RT) at last study observation, change in RT from baseline, risk of ERM recurrence, and adverse events. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool of observational studies using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions-I tool. The certainty of evidence of outcomes was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. Results: Nineteen studies reporting on 1,291 eyes at baseline were included. PPV with and without ILM peel achieved a similar BCVA at last study observation (p = 0.68) and change in BCVA from baseline (p = 0.79). These findings remained consistent irrespective of whether simultaneous phacoemulsification was performed. PPV with ILM peel achieved a significantly lower incidence of ERM recurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.26, 95% CI = [0.13, 0.51], p < 0.0001) and additional surgery (RR = 0.17, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.74], p = 0.02) compared to PPV without ILM peel. Conclusion: PPV with and without ILM peel achieved a similar BCVA at last study observation in ERM patients. Patients treated with PPV and ILM peel also had a reduced risk of ERM recurrence and lower reoperation risk. These conclusions are associated with a moderate certainty of evidence and potential for bias from multiple non-randomized studies.

THREE-DIMENSIONAL HEADS-UP VITRECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MICROSCOPIC VITRECTOMY FOR PATIENTS WITH EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE.

To investigate the efficacy and safety of 3D heads-up display (3D-HUD) vitrectomy compared with conventional microscopy (CM) vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. Epiretinal membrane removal with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was performed using a 3D-HUD or CM system. The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and in central macular thickness (CMT) and postoperative complications were assessed. Baseline demographics were comparable except for the follow-up period. Both BCVA and CMT improved at the final visit (all P < 0.05). The ERM recurrence and dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) rates were lower in the 3D group (both P < 0.05). conventional microscopic vitrectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 12.86, P = 0.02) and absence of ILM peeling (OR = 45.25, P < 0.05) were associated with ERM recurrence. In the DONFL, CM vitrectomy (OR = 1.98, <0.05) and combined phacovitrectomy (OR = 2.33, P = 0.03) were analyzed as risk factors for DONFL. The improvement in BCVA and CMT in ERM surgery using a 3D-HUD is comparable with that of CM vitrectomy, with a significantly low rate of ERM recurrence and DONFL occurrence. Therefore, 3D vitrectomy might have an advantage for ERM surgery.

AN ATYPICAL RETINAL VASCULITIS, ANEURYSMS AND NEURORETINITIS IRVAN: RARE CASE REPORT AND MANAGEMENT

Idiopathic retinal vasculitis, aneurysms, and neuroretinitis (IRVAN) syndrome is a rare and progressive disorder that predominantly affects both the eyes of young female individuals and can threaten visual function. Peripheral ischemia and macular exudation are regular ndings in patients. The treatment options include panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), systemic immunosuppression,and intravitreal antiangiogenic and corticosteroid therapy. Here we are presenting a case of old chronic IRVAN presenting as recurrent epiretinal membrane. Patient was underwent ERM removal and Dexamethasone implant to prevent recurrence in this case.

SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF VASOPROLIFERATIVE RETINAL TUMORS' REFRACTORY TO NONINVASIVE THERAPIES.

To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment of refractory vasoproliferative retinal tumors (VPTs) and its complications. Clinical charts of all patients diagnosed with VPTs who underwent surgical treatment from 2005 to 2020 were reviewed. Clinical features, surgical techniques, and outcomes were evaluated. From 25 eyes of 23 patients with VPTs, 17 (68%) eyes underwent surgical intervention to treat tumor activity and associated complications including epiretinal membrane (n = 10, 59%), retinal detachment (n = 8, 47%), and vitreous hemorrhage (n = 3, 18%). All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy with endolaser/cryotherapy to control tumor activity and to treat associated complications. Three cases required tumor resection. At the end of follow-up (mean 55.4 months, range 2-305 months), no eye presented tumor activity or retinal detachment after one or two surgeries. There was no epiretinal membrane recurrence. The mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity was 1.2 ± 0.7 logMAR, and the mean final best-corrected visual acuity was 0.7 ± 0.6 logMAR ( P < 0.05). The best-corrected visual acuity improved two or more lines in 12 (70.5%) eyes at the end of follow-up. In this series of patients with large active VPTs, surgical intervention allowed control of the tumor activity in all patients and provided overall satisfactory anatomic and functional outcomes.

Epiretinal membrane fragments: the origin of recurrent membranes after epiretinal membrane peeling

ObjectifExaminer le rôle des résidus de membrane épirétinienne (MER) dans le contexte d'une récurrence de MER après une vitrectomie par la pars plana (VPP) réalisée pour retirer une MER. NatureÉtude comparative rétrospective. ParticipantsUn total de 195 yeux de 195 patients ayant subi une VPP pour cause de MER. MéthodesOn a retiré la limitante interne sans avoir recours au bleu brillant G (BBG) jusqu'en mai 2017 (groupe 1) et en utilisant le BBG dans tous les yeux par la suite (groupe 2). Des images ont été obtenues grâce à la tomographie par cohérence optique (OCT) 3 jours et 3 ans après la VPP. RésultatsLe groupe 1 comptait 87 yeux, et le groupe 2, 108 yeux. Les images à l'OCT obtenues 3 jours après la VPP ont mis au jour des résidus de MER de même qu'un plissement de la surface rétinienne dans 53 yeux (27,2 %) et seulement un plissement de la surface rétinienne dans 9 yeux (4,6 %). Les images obtenues à l'OCT 3 ans après l'intervention ont révélé la présence d'une MER dans 63 yeux (32,3 %). À l'exception d'un seul œil, tous les yeux présentaient des résidus de MER et/ou un plissement de la surface rétinienne à l'OCT 3 jours après la VPP. Les résidus de MER présents 3 jours après l'intervention se sont agrandis dans 20 (64,5 %) des 31 yeux qui présentaient des résidus de MER 3 jours après l'intervention dans le groupe 1 et dans 5 (22,7 %) des 22 yeux qui présentaient des résidus de MER 3 jours après l'intervention dans le groupe 2, soit une différence significative (p = 0,003). ConclusionsLes résidus de MER peuvent donner lieu à une récurrence de MER après une VPP. Le retrait de la limitante interne réalisée avec injection de BBG peut empêcher la croissance des résidus de MER. L’élimination des résidus de MER et de limitante interne pendant l'intervention peut diminuer efficacement le risque de devoir réaliser une nouvelle chirurgie pour retirer la MER.

Efficacy of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Epiretinal Membrane Foveoschisis

Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate the outcomes of vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (FSIP) for epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis based on new optical coherence tomography definitions. Methods: Twenty-three eyes of 22 patients (69.7 ± 9.9 years old) who underwent vitrectomy with FSIP without gas tamponade for ERM foveoschisis were analyzed. All patients underwent follow-up examinations for at least 12 months. In the FSIP technique, the ILM is peeled off in a donut shape, preserving the foveal ILM. The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and surgical complications were examined. Results: The BCVA at 12 months improved significantly from baseline (p < 0.001). Baseline ellipsoid zone defects were found in 2 eyes (9%), and all defective eyes had recovered at 12 months. CMT decreased significantly from baseline (p < 0.001). Acute macular edema, full-thickness macular hole, and recurrence of ERM were not observed during follow-up. Discussion/Conclusion: FSIP achieved good visual outcome and retinal morphological change. Moreover, FSIP might avoid acute macular edema in ERM foveoschisis surgery.

Epiretinal Membrane Surgery Using Intraoperative OCT-Guided Membrane Removal in the DISCOVER Study versus Conventional Membrane Removal

To provide a comparative assessment of clinical outcomes between patients undergoing intraoperative OCT (iOCT) and conventional surgery for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) peel. Case-control retrospective, comparative assessment. Patients undergoing PPV with membrane peel for ERM with eyes pooled from the prospective Determination of Feasibility of Intraoperative Spectral Domain Microscope Combined/Integrated OCT Visualization During En Face Retinal and Ophthalmic Surgery (DISCOVER) iOCT study and eyes undergoing conventional ERM surgery without iOCT. Visual acuity and OCT assessment before ERM surgery and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up after standard small-gauge PPV with iOCT feedback (iOCT DISCOVER group) or PPV with compulsory internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (conventional group). Visual acuity, central subfield thickness (CST), reoperation rate, and ERM recurrence were determined by record review and post hoc assessment of clinical OCTs after ERM peel. Visual acuity and ERM recurrence. A total of 262 eyes were included. Visual acuity (VA) improved 11.9 letters in the iOCT group (P<0.0001) and 12.1 letters in the conventional group (P < 0.0001) at 12 months after ERM surgery. Visual acuity improvement did not differ between the iOCT and conventional groups at 1, 3, 6, or 12 months after surgery (P>0.05 for each time point). Preoperative mean CST decreased in the iOCT group (P < 0.0001) and conventional group (P < 0.0001) with no difference between groups in CST reduction at 12 months (P= 0.36). No reoperations or visually significant recurrent ERMs occurred in either cohort. Intraoperative OCT-guided ERM removal without mandated ILM peeling provided similar VA and anatomic results to conventional ILM peeling for ERM. Future randomized prospective studies are needed to assess fully the possible role of iOCT in ERM surgery and to evaluate the potential impact of nonfoveal ERM persistence or recurrence in comparison with conventional surgery.

Rates of Reoperation in 10 114 Patients with Epiretinal Membranes Treated by Vitrectomy with or without Inner Limiting Membrane Peeling

To compare rates of reoperation in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) who received pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and to assess trends in the overall use of ILM peeling over time. Retrospective cohort study. Patients included in the IBM Marketscan database between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016, who underwent surgery for idiopathic ERM. Procedure claims with laterality codes were used to determine patients with idiopathic ERM who received PPV with or without ILM peel between 2008 and 2016, and to identify cases of reoperation and subsequent retinal detachment within 1 year of index surgery. The primary outcome was rate of reoperation for recurrent ERM according to whether or not patients receive an ILM peel during their index ERM surgery. We also assessed trends for index ERM surgery (ILM peel or no ILM peel) between 2008 and 2016, and the risk of developing retinal detachment within 1 year of the index ERM surgery. A total of 10 114 patients received ERM surgery and met inclusion criteria (5310 without ILM peel and 4804 with ILM peel). The reoperation rate was significantly lower among patients who received PPV with ILM peel (0.88%) compared with patients without ILM peel (1.48%; P= 0.007). In 2008, PPV without ILM peel represented 70% of ERM procedures, but PPV with ILM peeling accounted for 52% and 70% of ERM procedures in 2013 (P < 0.001) and 2016 (P < 0.001), respectively. The rates of retinal detachment were similar between patients who received an ILM peel (0.79%) and patients who did not receive an ILM peel (0.92%) during their primary ERM surgery (P= 0.474). The increasing use of PPV with ILM peeling to address ERM removal is associated with significantly reduced reoperation rates within 1 year. Future studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of performing an ILM peel for initial idiopathic ERM repairs and evaluate long-term visual and structural changes related to ILM peeling.

RECURRENCE OF IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE AND ITS PREDISPOSING FACTORS: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

To evaluate the incidence and clinical course of recurrent epiretinal membrane (ERM) after ERM surgery and to identify predisposing optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings for the recurrence. Postoperative ERM recurrence, defined as reappearance of the membrane after its removal or regrowth of the remnant membrane, was investigated in 301 eyes with idiopathic ERM followed up for more than 6 months after macular surgery by fundus photographs and spectral-domain OCT. The incidences of recurrent ERM and its associated clinical characteristics were assessed. Preceding OCT findings in the area subsequently showing recurrent ERM were evaluated at early postoperative periods. Among the 301 eyes that underwent ERM peeling, 119 (39.5%) and 86 (28.6%) showed ERM recurrence on OCT images and biomicroscopic examination/fundus photographs, respectively, during the follow-up period (average: 18.1 months). Neighboring remnant membrane and hyperreflective dots on the retinal surface at 1 week after the surgery and postoperative inner retinal wrinkling persisting for ≥1 month were predisposing OCT findings for ERM recurrence, with an odds ratio of 6.48 (95% confidence interval, 3.51-12.0), 3.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.81-6.70), and 6.11 (95% confidence interval, 3.30-11.3), respectively (all P < 0.001). Incidence of ERM recurrence varies depending on the definition used for the recurrence. Optical coherence tomography examination may be useful for the prediction and sensitive detection of recurrent ERM.

Does internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane surgery induce microscotomas on microperimetry? Study protocol for PEELING, a randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundThe epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a degenerative condition associated with age, which can cause loss of vision and/or metamorphopsia. The treatment of symptomatic ERM involves surgical removal including a vitrectomy followed by peeling of the ERM using a microforceps. As the internal limiting membrane (ILM) is adherent to the ERM, it is sometimes removed with it (spontaneous peeling). If ILM remains in place, it can be removed to reduce ERM recurrence. However, it is important to clarify the safety of ILM peeling, while it increases surgical risks and cause histological disorganization of the retina that can lead to microscotomas, may be responsible for definitive visual discomfort.MethodsPEELING is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, and multicentered trial with two parallel arms. This study investigates the benefit/risk ratio of active ILM peeling among individuals undergoing ERM surgery without spontaneous ILM peeling. Randomization is done in the operating room after ERM removal if ILM remains in place. After randomization, the two groups—“active peeling of the ILM” and “no peeling of the ILM”—are compared during a total of three follow-up visits scheduled at month 1, month 6, and month 12. Primary endpoint is the difference in microscotomas before surgery and 6 months after surgery. Patients with spontaneous peeling are not randomized and are included in the ancillary study with the same follow-up visits and the same examinations as the principal study.Relevant inclusion criteria involve individuals aged > 18 years living with idiopathic symptomatic ERM, including pseudophakic patients with transparent posterior capsule or open capsule or lensed patients with age-related cataracts. The calculated sample size corresponds to 53 randomized eyes (one eye/patient) per arm that means 106 randomized eyes (106 randomized patients) in total and a maximum of 222 included patients (116 spontaneous peeling).DiscussionILM peeling is often practiced in ERM surgery to reduce ERM recurrence. It does not impair postoperative visual acuity, but it increases the surgical risks and causes anatomical damages. If active ILM peeling is significantly associated with more microscotomas, it may contraindicate the ILM peeling during primitive idiopathic ERM surgery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02146144. Registered on 22 May 2014. Recruitment is still ongoing.

Anatomic and functional results of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane surgery.

To assess the impact of macular surgery on the functional and anatomic outcomes in patients with grade 2 epiretinal membrane (ERM), and the effect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on visual acuity and to analyze the long-term effect of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) on intraocular pressure (IOP). Pseudophakic eyes (62 eyes) diagnosed as idiopathic grade 2 ERM with at least 6mo postoperative follow-up were included in this retrospective study. The fellow eye was nonvitrectomized. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (29 eyes) treated with ERM and ILM peeling and group 2 (33 eyes) with only ERM peeling. Preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp, and a dilated fundus examination was performed. IOP was measured with Goldman applanation tonometer before, day 1 and first week and each visit after surgery. The incidence of significant IOP elevation was compared between vitrectomized eyes and nonvitrectomized fellow eyes. Visual improvement was statistically significant and similar in both groups (P=0.008 in group 1, P=0.002 in group 2, P=0.09 inter-group). The amount of decrease in central macular thickness was statistically significant and similar in both groups (P=0.005 group 1, P=0.008 group 2, P=0.37 intergroup). At the final follow-up (14.1±9.6mo) the incidence of significant IOP elevation was 4% in vitrectomized eyes (three eyes) and 3% (two eyes) in the nonvitrectomized fellow eyes (P=0.12). Four eyes (12.1%) had recurrent ERM after a mean follow-up of 8.6±1.1mo in group 2, there was no recurrence in group 1 (P=0.01). Recurrence of ERM may be decreased by ILM peeling during ERM surgery. However, it seems that ILM peeling do not affect the functional outcome and 23-gauge PPV alone do not have a significant effect on IOP.

EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE REMOVAL WITH FOVEAL-SPARING INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING: A Pilot Study.

To compare the retinal sensitivity after complete internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling with that after foveal-sparing ILM peeling during vitrectomy for Type I epiretinal membrane. This was a prospective, randomized, comparative study. Thirty-eight eyes were randomized to undergo complete peeling of the ILM (CP group) or peeling with foveal sparing (FS group). The main outcome measures were foveal and perifoveal retinal sensitivity, visual acuity, and central retinal thickness. Foveal retinal sensitivity showed a significant improvement in the FS group (2.82 ± 0.85 dB, P = 0.037) versus a slight drop in the CP group (-0.66 ± 0.48 dB, P = 1). Perifoveal retinal sensitivity slightly improved in both groups (0.47 ± 0.37 dB, P = 1 in the CP group and 0.79 ± 0.42 dB, P = 0.77 in the FS group), showing a similar trend without significant differences. Significant improvements were observed in both visual acuity and central retinal thickness in both groups. However, three cases in the FS group showed epiretinal membrane recurrence and required revision surgery with complete ILM removal. Internal limiting membrane peeling may reduce retinal sensitivity and significantly increase the incidence of microscotomas. However, the higher epiretinal membrane recurrence rate after the foveal-sparing technique limits the effectiveness of this procedure. Further studies must be conducted to determine if it is safe to leave a portion of the ILM in front of the fovea.

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS, LONG-TERM SURGICAL OUTCOMES, AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE IN YOUNG PATIENTS.

To explore the clinical characteristics, long-term surgical outcomes, and prognostic factors for vision improvement in young patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM). A cohort of in-patients aged <40 years and underwent surgical removal of ERM were selected from medical records between January 2009 and December 2015. Data from pre- and postoperative examinations were analyzed for evaluation of surgical outcome. A total of 142 eyes of 140 patients were included. Epiretinal membrane was secondary in 64.79% of eyes and inflammation was the most common secondary cause. Epiretinal membrane in young patients was characterized by severe proliferation and a tendency to center off-macula and for optic disk involvement. Ninety-three eyes of 91 patients were included in the surgical outcome analysis. Mean follow-up time was 28.95 months. The average vision improvement was 4.2 lines, with an ERM recurrence rate of 4.3%. Patients with idiopathic ERM attained better visual outcomes, whereas those with secondary ERM showed greater improvement. Preoperative visual acuity, the duration of symptoms, and patient sex were predictive factors for visual outcome. Surgical removal of ERM improves visual acuity, and patients with greater preoperative visual acuity and a shorter duration of symptoms attain the best visual outcomes.

Evaluation of Factors Affecting Epiretinal Membrane Surgery Outcomes.

Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate several factors affecting the outcome of epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery.Methods:The data of a total of 41 eyes of 40 patients (20 female, 20 male) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling with/without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling between November 2001 and October 2005 at Beyoğlu Eye Training and Research Hospital with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included in this retrospective study. The patients’ best corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Snellen) and the biomicroscopic, funduscopic, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings measured preoperatively and at month 1,3,6, and a final visit were recorded. The surgical technique (partial 25-gauge vs 20-gauge), ILM peeling, intraoperative dyes, and the etiology of the ERM were evaluated as separate factors in the surgical outcome. Intraoperative, peroperative, and postoperative complications were assessed and compared.Results:The mean age of the study group participants was 63.56±14.96 years. The mean BCVA had increased from 0.28±0.149 to 0.35±0.24 Snellen lines (p=0.028) at the 6-month visit. In all, 18 of 41 eyes (43.9%) had gained ≥2 Snellen lines at the final visit. Cataract progression was detected in 17 cases (54.8%) of phakic eyes. The incidence of ERM recurrence was significantly greater in the ILM Intact group (37% vs 0%) than in the ILM Peeled group (p=0.009). There was no significant difference in anatomical or functional outcome between the partial 25-gauge and 20-gauge PPV techniques.Conclusion:ILM peeling significantly reduced ERM recurrence. Follow-up observations indicated that cataract progression was the primary factor limiting visual gain.

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Sutureless Vitrectomy for Combined Epiretinal and Internal Limiting Membrane Removal

Purpose: The purpose of this case series is to evaluate the long-term visual outcomes of patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling via sutureless vitrectomy. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 45 patients (45 eyes) with ERMs treated with 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) from 2010 to 2011. Data assessed included baseline characteristics, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ERM recurrence rate during follow-up, and complications arising during follow-up. Results: PPV resulted in a statistically significant improvement in BCVA (20/61 preoperatively, 20/41 1 year postoperatively, and 20/45 at the end of follow-up). Mean duration of follow-up was 66.3 months (range, 26-89). Forty-one of 45 (91%) eyes had improved or stable vision, while 4/45 (8.9%) had worse vision. ERMs recurred in 12/45 eyes (26.7%), of which 1/45 (2.2%) required reoperation. The remaining 11 recurrent ERMs were documented as visually insignificant. Mean time to ERM recurrence was 29.3 months (range, 4-72). Conclusions: In one of the longest mean follow-up studies to date, small-gauge PPV for ERM and ILM removal results in statistically significant and stable long-term visual improvement. Despite ILM removal, ERMs did recur in a substantial proportion of patients, though the vast majority were not visually significant.

TO PEEL OR NOT TO PEEL THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE IN IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES.

Epiretinal membranes (ERMs) have been described for more than 150 years. Currently, they are a common indication for vitreoretinal surgery. Recently, there has been an increasing trend to peel the internal limiting membrane (ILM). Although ILM peeling has generally been accepted as a fundamental step in macular hole repair, its current role in ERM remains controversial. Literature review. Proponents of ILM peeling argue that peeling of the ILM reduces the recurrence rate and facilitates a greater resolution of retinal folds. Opponents of ILM peeling show that the visual outcomes between eyes that undergo ILM peeling and those that do not have their ILM peeled are the same. Stripping of the ILM removes the Müller cell footplates, so it is reasonable to expect some Müller cell dysfunction. Adverse events such as eccentric paracentral macular holes, macular microscotomata, and retinal dimpling have been associated with ILM peeling. Internal limiting membrane peeling does not improve the functional outcomes after ERM surgery. Internal limiting membrane peeling reduces ERM recurrences, but many recurrences are not clinically significant. It remains unclear what the long-term effects of ILM peeling are. We should err on the side of caution and avoid routine ILM peeling in primary idiopathic ERM cases and should reserve it for recurrent and high risk of recurrence cases.

FIVE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP AFTER EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY: A Single-Center Experience.

To evaluate the rate of epiretinal membrane (ERM) recurrence in eyes that underwent ERM peeling surgery at least 5 years earlier. Retrospective interventional case series study of 37 patients (15 women and 22 men; mean age, 70 ± 7.6 years) operated on for ERM removal with a follow-up of at least 5 years. The patients underwent testing for visual acuity, an ophthalmic examination, and optical coherence tomography imaging, all of which were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the 5-year follow-up. Visual acuity significantly improved at 1 year after peeling compared with baseline (P = 0.045), and the improved results were maintained at 5 years (P = 0.804) 0.766 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen 6/35). The central macular thickness decreased significantly at the 1-year follow-up compared with baseline and continued to decrease as measured at the 5-year follow-up (P = 0.04). At 5 years, the ERM recurrence rate reached 58% (28% extrafoveal). Photoreceptor atrophy and retinal pigment epithelium changes correlated with diabetes mellitus (P = 0.028). The recurrence rate of ERM after peeling surgery was reported as being around 5% to 12%. It was 58% in the current study. Because the recurrent ERM is generally mild, visual acuity was unaffected.

Five-Year Outcomes of Surgically Treated Symptomatic Epiretinal Membranes With and Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling.

The authors evaluated long-term postoperative visual outcomes and recurrence rates following surgery for symptomatic epiretinal membrane (ERM) ± internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. This was a retrospective, consecutive case series of 78 patients undergoing vitrectomy for symptomatic ERM between 1/2010 and 4/2012 with follow-up through at least postoperative year 5 (POY5). Outcomes included visual acuity (VA) (Snellen VA converted to logMAR), central retinal thickness (CRT; μm), and ERM recurrence. Subgroup analysis evaluated outcomes related to ILM peeling. Subgroup analysis based on ILM peeling did not find VA (20/50 [0.430 logMAR ± 0.061 logMAR; mean ± SD] vs. 20/60 [0.518 logMAR ± 0.128 logMAR] for ILM vs. non-ILM peeling respectively; P = .513) nor macular thickness (355 μm ± 13 μm vs. 360 μm ± 42 μm; P = .410) to be significantly different at POY5. Recurrence requiring surgery with and without ILM peeling was not statistically significantly different at POY5 (1.6% and 11.8%; P = .118). Vitrectomy for symptomatic ERM led to improved visual and anatomic outcomes with sustained benefit through 5 years. ILM peeling was was associated with reduced ERM recurrence, but this benefit was not statistically significant at POY5. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:296-302.].

Recurrence rate and need for reoperation after surgery with or without internal limiting membrane removal for the treatment of the epiretinal membrane

PurposeTo compare the recurrence rate and need for reoperation after epiretinal membrane surgery with and without removal of the internal limiting membrane.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 125 patients operated for epiretinal membrane removal were evaluated, with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Removal of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) was performed in 78 patients, while 47 had removal of the epiretinal membrane associated with internal limiting membrane peeling (ERM + ILM).ResultsThe mean age in the ERM group was 65.8 years old, ranging from 41 to 80 years old. In the ERM + ILM group, the mean age was 67.2 years old, ranging from 52 to 82 years old. The mean preoperative visual acuity in the ERM group was 20/80p, and in the ERM + ILM group, it was 20/80. The mean postoperative visual acuity in both groups was 20/30. The mean preoperative macular thickness in the ERM group was 467 µm ranging from 281 to 663 µm; in the ERM + ILM group, the preoperative macular thickness was 497 µm, ranging from 172 to 798 µm. After surgery, a reduction in macular thickness was observed in both groups. In the ERM group, the mean macular thickness reduction was 361 ± 101. µm, whereas in the ERM + ILM group, it was 367 ± 75.2 µm. Twenty-two patients presented with a recurrence of epiretinal membrane, of which 16 (20.5%) were from the ERM group and 6 (12.8%) were from the ERM + ILM group (p = 0.39); one patient (2%) was retreated in the ERM + ILM group, whereas 5 patients (6%) where retreated in the ERM group.ConclusionWe postulate that ILM peeling for the treatment of epiretinal membrane is not a relevant factor either for visual recovery or macular thickness reduction, but it may reduce the recurrence and reoperation rate.