Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma Research Articles

The impact of the cancer genome atlas status among patients with recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma treated with secondary cytoreductive surgery

The impact of the cancer genome atlas status among patients with recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma treated with secondary cytoreductive surgery

The efficacy and safety of cadonilimab after first anti-PD-1 failure in the treatment of recurrent endometrial and cervical carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study

The efficacy and safety of cadonilimab after first anti-PD-1 failure in the treatment of recurrent endometrial and cervical carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study

Impact of chemotherapy on patients with mismatch repair deficient advanced endometrial carcinomas-a meta-analysis.

Chemo-immunotherapy is standard of care for women with recurrent or advanced mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) endometrial carcinomas (EC). However, it is uncertain whether patients with dMMR advanced or recurrent EC derive less benefit from chemotherapy than those with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) EC. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in advanced/recurrent EC to determine the difference in the benefit of chemotherapy in dMMR vs pMMR EC. Data on chemotherapy outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were retrieved. We pooled these data using the inverse variance method and examined subgroup difference by MMR status. We also compared differences in PFS and OS outcomes by creating individual patient data from the Kaplan-Meier curves of trial publications for sensitivity analyses. A total of five RCTs with 1137 participants (dMMR, 26%; pMMR, 74%) were included. All participants were treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy. There was no difference between the dMMR and pMMR subgroups for ORR (66.5% vs 64.0%, P = .20 for subgroup difference), PFS (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77-1.12, P = .44; median PFS 7.6 vs 9.5 months) or OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.73-1.44, P = .88; median OS not reached vs 28.6 months). ORR, PFS and OS were similar among those with dMMR vs pMMR endometrial cancer treated with front-line, platinum-doublet chemotherapy in randomized clinical trials. These findings reinforce the importance of combining chemotherapy together with immune checkpoint inhibitors until the results of trials comparing immune checkpoint therapy alone with combination therapy are available.

Atezolizumab and chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (AtTEnd): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

At the time of AtTEnd trial design, standard treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer included carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. This trial assessed whether combining atezolizumab with chemotherapy might improve outcomes in this population. AtTEnd was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 89 hospitals in 11 countries across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Asia. Enrolled patients were aged 18 years or older, and had advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma or carcinosarcoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and received no previous systemic chemotherapy for recurrence. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system (block size of six) to either atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo given intravenously with chemotherapy (carboplatin at area under the curve of 5 or 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days) for 6-8 cycles, then continued until progression. Stratification factors were country, histological subtype, advanced or recurrent status, and mismatch repair (MMR) status. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The hierarchically tested co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (in patients with MMR-deficient [dMMR] tumours, and in the overall population) and overall survival (in the overall population). Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned patients who gave their full consent to participation in the study and data processing. Safety was assessed in all patients included in the intention-to-treat population who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, we report the primary progression-free survival and the interim overall survival results. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03603184. Between Oct 3, 2018, and Jan 7, 2022, 551 patients were randomly assigned to atezolizumab (n=362) or placebo (n=189). Two patients in the atezolizumab group were excluded from all analyses due to lack of consent. Median follow-up was 28·3 months (IQR 21·2-37·6). 81 (23%) patients in the atezolizumab group and 44 (23%) patients in the placebo group had dMMR disease by central assessment. In the dMMR population, median progression-free survival was not estimable (95% CI 12·4 months-not estimable [NE]) in the atezolizumab group and 6·9 months (6·3-10·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·36, 95% CI 0·23-0·57; p=0·0005). In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 10·1 months (95% CI 9·5-12·3) in the atezolizumab group and 8·9 months (8·1-9·6) in the placebo group (HR 0·74, 95% CI 0·61-0·91; p=0·022). Median overall survival was 38·7 months (95% CI 30·6-NE) in the atezolizumab group and 30·2 months (25·0-37·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·63-1·07; log-rank p=0·048). The p value for the interim analysis of overall survival did not cross the stopping boundary; therefore, the trial will continue until the required number of events are recorded. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (97 [27%] of 356 patients in the atezolizumab group vs 51 [28%] of 185 in the placebo group) and anaemia (49 [14%] vs 24 [13%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 46 (13%) patients in the atezolizumab group and six (3%) patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in two patients (pneumonia in one patient in each group). Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy increased progression-free survival in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, particularly in those with dMMR carcinomas, suggesting the addition of atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment in this specific subgroup. F Hoffmann-La Roche.

ENGOT-EN20/GOG-3083/XPORT-EC-042 – A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial of selinexor in maintenance therapy after systemic therapy for patients with p53 wild-type, advanced, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: rationale, methods, and trial design

BackgroundPatients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Biomarkers such as tumor protein 53 (TP53) in endometrial cancer can integrate novel strategies for improved and...

Salvage radiotherapy for locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma: clinical outcomes and toxicities

BackgroundThe management of locally recurrent gynecological carcinoma remains a challenge due to the limited availability of data. This study aims to share our institutional experience in using definitive radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma.MethodsThe study retrospectively reviewed 20 patients in our hospital completing salvage 3D image-based HDR brachytherapy, with or without EBRT, for locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma after surgery. The Kaplan–Meier method was applied to estimate the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The toxicities were assessed by CTCAEv5.ResultsDuring a median observation period of 21 months, the study reported a tumor objective response rate of 95%. The 3-year DFS and OS rates were 89.4% and 90.9%, respectively. The EBRT combined with brachytherapy achieved a median cumulative dose of 88 Gy to CTV D90. 14 patients received concurrent and/or systemic chemotherapy. Two patients suffered locoregional recurrence after salvage treatment, one of whom only received salvage brachytherapy for prior RT history. The analysis identified significant predictors for DFS, including tumor histology and FIGO stage. 5 patients observed acute grade 1–2 rectal (15%) or genitourinary (10%) toxicities. Late toxicities including grade 1–2 rectal bleeding (10%) and grade 2 pelvic fracture (5%) were seen in 3 patients.Conclusions3D image-guided brachytherapy combined with EBRT shows effective tumor control and acceptable toxicity profile for women with locally recurrent gynecologic cancer. The success in managing vaginal recurrence is notably influenced by histologic subtype and FIGO staging.

Tumoral programmed cell death 1 (PD1) expression in endometrial carcinoma is a prognostic marker for patient outcome

ObjectiveImmune checkpoint inhibitors have recently demonstrated benefit in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma. This retrospective study investigated immune checkpoint molecules in endometrial carcinoma as they pertain to the...

Molecular classification of metastatic and recurrent endometrial endometrioid carcinoma: prognostic relevance among low- and high-stage tumours.

Molecular classification according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) improves endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) prognostication and has specific treatment implications; however, original data were skewed towards low-grade and low-stage tumours. Herein, we molecularly classify EECs metastatic at the time of diagnosis or with subsequently documented recurrent/metastatic disease to examine correlation with clinical outcomes. TCGA categories include POLE-mutated, microsatellite instability (MSI), p53 abnormal (p53 abnl) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP). POLE targeted sequencing at exons 9, 11, 13 and 14 and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PMS2, MSH6 and p53 were performed to establish molecular classification. The distribution in our cohort of 141 EECs was similar to that generally reported in EEC, with nine POLE-mutated (6%), 45 MSI (32%), 16 p53 abnl (11%) and 71 NSMP (50%), with similar distributions between low- and high-stage cohorts. We demonstrate that when stratified by molecular subtype, disease-specific survival from the time of high-stage (stages III-IV) presentation or time of recurrence in low-stage (stages I-II) disease among metastatic and/or recurrent EEC is strongly associated with TCGA classification (high-stage P = 0.02, low-stage P = 0.017). Discordant molecular classification between primary and metastatic/recurrent tumours occurred in four of 105 (3.8%) patients, two related to PMS2/MSH6 IHC and two related to p53 IHC. We demonstrate that molecular classification is prognostically relevant not only at the time of diagnosis, but also at the time of recurrence and in the metastatic setting. Rare subclonal alterations occur and suggest a role for confirming TCGA classification in recurrent/metastatic tumours.

GOG3069: Phase 2 study of alpelisib and fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated estrogen receptor (ER)-positive endometrioid endometrial cancers.

TPS5639 Background: Treatment options for persistent, metastatic, or recurrent endometrial cancer continues to evolve as we learn more about the molecular landscape of this disease. Recent studies have shown a benefit to endocrine-based combinations such as aromatase inhibitors with mTOR or CDK4/6 inhibitors especially in patients who had not received prior chemotherapy ( 1– 3). The presence of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations have been shown to impact response to aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer. The combination of alpelisib and fulvestrant was approved for the treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer harboring oncogenic mutations in the PIK3CA gene that progressed on prior endocrine therapy( 4). PIK3CA mutations are commonly identified in endometrial cancers and may similarly confer endocrine resistance. GOG3069 is a phase II trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alpelisib and fulvestrant in a biomarker-selected endometrial cancer patient population. Methods: This is a phase II non-randomized, open label, multicenter, two-stage study. Eligible patients must have advanced (FIGO 2014 Stage III or IV), persistent, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma with measurable disease by RECISTv1.1 criteria. Patients cannot be curable by surgery or radiotherapy. Disease must be of endometrioid histology with positive expression of estrogen receptor (defined as ≥1% of tumor cells demonstrating positive nuclear staining by immunohistochemistry) and oncogenic PIK3CA mutation. Patients may have received no more than 3 prior lines of therapy including 1 prior line of systemic chemotherapy. Enrolled patients will receive treatment with alpelisib 300mg orally daily and fulvestrant 500mg IM on Day 1 and Day 15 of Cycle 1, then 500mg IM on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint is overall response rate as measured by RECISTv1.1-defined tumor response. Secondary endpoints include safety, tolerability, progression-free survival, duration of response, and 24-month overall survival rate. GOG3069 activated in November 2023 and expects to enroll across 15 US sites. The statistical plan uses a conditional stratified design factoring differing probabilities of response based on whether the patient had prior chemotherapy exposure. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05154487

A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter study of nab-sirolimus plus letrozole in advanced or recurrent endometrioid endometrial cancer.

TPS5640 Background: This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the antitumor activity of nab-sirolimus in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). Despite recent pivotal data demonstrating improved outcomes with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, regardless of mismatch repair status, alternative nonchemotherapy-based treatment options for patients with advanced or recurrent EEC remain necessary. Dysregulation of mTOR signaling is implicated in the pathology of EEC, in which >80% harbor PTEN or PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway alterations. Moreover, crosstalk between mTOR and estrogen receptor signaling pathways is associated with endocrine therapy resistance. GOG-3007 and other phase 2 studies have demonstrated that the combination of conventional mTOR inhibitors (mTORis) and endocrine therapy provides clinical benefit in patients with EEC. nab-Sirolimus is an mTOR inhibitor that uses albumin-bound sirolimus nanoparticles given by IV and is approved by the US FDA for malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor. Preclinical data of nab-sirolimus demonstrated improved tumor accumulation, mTOR inhibition, and tumor growth suppression compared with conventional mTORis. We hypothesize that the simultaneous inhibition of mTOR and ER with nab-sirolimus and letrozole, respectively, may provide a signal of synergistic antitumor activity in patients with recurrent EEC. Methods: In this phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study (NCT05997017), nab-sirolimus (100 mg/m2, intravenous, on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle) and letrozole (2.5 mg, oral, daily) are administered to patients (~29 planned, Simon’s 2-stage design) with clinically confirmed, advanced, or recurrent EEC. Eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, ≤1 prior chemotherapy-based regimen in the advanced, metastatic, or recurrent setting, prior adjuvant chemotherapy is permitted, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 0 or 1, naive to mTORi, and measurable disease (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1). The primary endpoint is best overall response rate by RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate (defined as complete response plus partial response plus stable disease of ≥12 weeks after start of treatment), progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include correlation of baseline molecular biomarkers with clinical outcomes. The trial is open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT05997017 .

35MO Quality-adjusted survival in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel versus carboplatin-paclitaxel in the AtTEnd/ENGOT-EN7 trial

35MO Quality-adjusted survival in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel versus carboplatin-paclitaxel in the AtTEnd/ENGOT-EN7 trial

36MO Patient-reported outcomes in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab or placebo in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel in the AtTEnd/ENGOT-EN7 trial

36MO Patient-reported outcomes in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab or placebo in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel in the AtTEnd/ENGOT-EN7 trial

Hormone Receptor Expression and Activity for Different Tumour Locations in Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma.

Response to hormonal therapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) can be predicted by oestrogen and progesterone receptor immunohistochemical (ER/PR-IHC) expression, with response rates of 60% in PR-IHC > 50% cases. ER/PR-IHC can vary by tumour location and is frequently lost with tumour progression. Therefore, we explored the relationship between ER/PR-IHC expression and tumour location in EC. Pre-treatment tumour biopsies from 6 different sites of 80 cases treated with hormonal therapy were analysed for ER/PR-IHC expression and classified into categories 0-10%, 10-50%, and >50%. The ER pathway activity score (ERPAS) was determined based on mRNA levels of ER-related target genes, reflecting the actual activity of the ER receptor. There was a trend towards lower PR-IHC (33% had PR > 50%) and ERPAS (27% had ERPAS > 15) in lymphogenic metastases compared to other locations (p = 0.074). Hematogenous and intra-abdominal metastases appeared to have high ER/PR-IHC and ERPAS (85% and 89% ER-IHC > 50%; 64% and 78% PR-IHC > 50%; 60% and 71% ERPAS > 15, not significant). Tumour grade and previous radiotherapy did not affect ER/PR-IHC or ERPAS. A trend towards lower PR-IHC and ERPAS was observed in lymphogenic sites. Verification in larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings, which may have implications for the use of hormonal therapy in the future.

Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib compared with chemotherapy for treating previously treated advanced endometrial cancer in Sweden

Objective Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib was recently approved for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with disease progression on or following prior treatment with a platinum‑containing therapy in any setting, and who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation (KEYNOTE-775/Study-309; NCT03517449). The objective was to assess the cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib compared with chemotherapy from a Swedish healthcare perspective. Materials and methods A lifetime partitioned-survival model with three health states (progression free, progressed disease, death) was constructed. Chemotherapy was represented by paclitaxel or doxorubicin. Overall survival, progression-free survival, time on treatment, and utility data were obtained from KEYNOTE-775 (database lock: March 1, 2022). Costs (in 2020 Swedish Krona [SEK]) included drug acquisition and administration, health state, end of life, adverse event management, subsequent treatment, and societal (scenario analysis). Outcomes were calculated as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and life-years. Model results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for all-comers, patients with proficient mismatch repair tumors, and deficient mismatch repair tumors. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is a cost-effective treatment when compared with chemotherapy, with estimated deterministic and probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of SEK 795,712 and 819,757 per QALY gained. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib was associated with a large incremental QALY and life-year gain per person versus chemotherapy over the model time horizon (1.49 and 1.76). Limitations Time-to-event data were incomplete and semiparametric and parametric curves were utilized for lifetime extrapolation. Willingness-to-pay thresholds, costs, and utility weights vary by country, which would vary the treatment’s cost effectiveness in different countries. Conclusions This partitioned survival analysis suggests that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is cost effective compared with chemotherapy in Sweden for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma following previous systemic therapy. Results were robust to mismatch repair status and to changes in parameters/assumptions.

Early-stage endometrial carcinoma; risk factors for recurrence

Background: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries. The overall prognosis is excellent, as most cases are diagnosed at an early stage with low-grade histology, but once the recurrence occurs, the median survival decreases severely. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with recurrence in early-stage EC and explore their impact on overall survival (OS) after recurrence. Materials and Methods: Records from patients diagnosed with EC were retrospectively reviewed. 220 patients were identified as early-stage, low-risk EC who underwent primary surgical treatment between January 2010 and December 2022, and their baseline characteristics were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify various factors for tumor recurrence. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In a cohort of 220 patients, we observed tumor recurrence in 44 (20%) patients and 34 (15.45%) deaths over a median follow-up of 72 months (range, 12–144 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed two risk factors: myometrial invasion (MMI) of any depth and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) as independent predictors of recurrence. The prognosis was worse for patients with recurrence than for those without. The OS for the recurrent group was 38.6%, compared to 96.0% in the non-recurrent group. In our study, the median time to recurrence was 19 months (confidence interval 18–30) months. Conclusion: The presence of MMI and LVI are important predictors for recurrence in early-stage low-risk EC.

Abstract A018: A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter study of nab-sirolimus plus letrozole in advanced or recurrent endometrioid endometrial cancer

Abstract Introduction/Objective: This trial in progress is designed to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of nab-sirolimus in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). Despite recent pivotal data demonstrating improved outcomes with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, regardless of mismatch repair status, alternative treatment options, particularly for advanced or recurrent EEC remain necessary. Dysregulation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is implicated in the pathology of EEC, in which >80% harbor PTEN or PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations. Moreover, crosstalk between mTOR and estrogen receptor signaling pathways is associated with endocrine resistance. GOG-3007 and other phase 2 studies have demonstrated that the combination of conventional mTOR inhibitors (mTORis) and endocrine therapy provides clinical benefit in patients with EC. nab-Sirolimus, a nanoparticle injectable form of mTORi, is approved in the USA for malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor. Preclinical data of nab-sirolimus demonstrated improved tumor accumulation, mTOR inhibition, and tumor growth suppression compared with conventional mTORis. We hypothesize that nab-sirolimus in combination with letrozole may produce synergistic antitumor activity in patients with recurrent EEC. Methods: In this phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study (NCT05997017), nab-sirolimus (100 mg/m2, intravenous, on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle) and letrozole (2.5 mg, oral, daily) are administered to patients (~29 planned) with clinically confirmed, advanced, or recurrent EEC. Eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, ≤1 prior chemo-based regimen, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 0 or 1, naïve to mTORi, and measurable disease (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1). The primary endpoint is best overall response rate by RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints include duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The relationship between biomarkers and response outcomes is an exploratory endpoint. Citation Format: Lauren E. Dockery, Anna Priebe, Linda Duska, Angela K. Green, Cara Mathews, Fernanda Musa, David O'Malley, Allison Puechl, Li Ding, Anita N. Schmid, Willis H. Navarro, Brian Slomovitz, Kathleen Moore. A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter study of nab-sirolimus plus letrozole in advanced or recurrent endometrioid endometrial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Transforming Care through Science; 2023 Nov 16-18; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(5_Suppl):Abstract nr A018.

Prognostic factors of patients with recurrent uterine malignancies undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Several studies have demonstrated that secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) for patients with recurrent uterine malignancies may improve the survival. However, the selection criteria for SCS remain to be defined. This study aimed to assess the outcome of SCS and to explore factors that may influence the prognosis. Data of patients with recurrent uterine malignancies who received SCS in our hospital between January 2005 and January 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were assigned into endometrial carcinoma (EC) group and uterine sarcoma (US) group. 84 cases in total were involved in the study, including 47 cases with recurrent EC and 37 cases with recurrent US. The 5-year survival of cases with recurrent EC and recurrent US was 59.6% and 33.3%, respectively. Recurrent EC cases with a lower tumor grade (G1/G1-G2/G2), size of the largest tumor ≤ 6cm, single recurrent tumor, a history of adjuvant therapy, as well as recurrent US cases with younger age, a longer disease-free interval (DFI) before SCS (≥ 12 months), no peritoneal dissemination, and a history of complete cytoreduction were associated with a longer survival. The number of recurrent tumors was found as an independent prognostic factor of SCS. Recurrent EC cases with a lower tumor grade, smaller tumor size, single tumor, a history of adjuvant therapy, as well as recurrent US cases with younger age, a longer DFI before SCS, no peritoneal dissemination, and a history of complete cytoreduction were more likely to benefit from SCS.

Case report: prolonged durable clinical benefit and low toxicity from combination endocrine therapy in a patient with recurrent endometrial carcinoma

BackgroundEndometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic cancer, with increasing incidence and mortality. Combination endocrine therapy comprised of tamoxifen and progestational agents has demonstrated promising results in treating recurrent disease. This case report describes the prolonged clinical benefit of treatment with tamoxifen and megestrol acetate in a woman with recurrent, metastatic endometrial endometrioid carcinoma positive for estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR).CaseA 71-year-old gravida 1 para 1 woman presented with postmenopausal bleeding and vaginal discharge. Pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a 4.7 cm endometrial mass. The patient underwent a total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and cystoscopy; pathology revealed a FIGO stage IA grade 1 ER/PR-positive endometroid endometrial adenocarcinoma. She continued under active surveillance for approximately 42 months until she experienced bone metastases in her pelvis, for which she received radiation therapy. Five months later, pulmonary metastases were detected, and she received six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. She then started megestrol acetate and tamoxifen and has remained clinically stable with minimal side effects and reasonable quality of life for approximately 57 months.ConclusionOur case suggests that combination endocrine therapy has the potential to provide substantial long-term clinical benefit in women with recurrent endometrial cancer and bone metastases, despite multiple prior treatments, allowing patients to experience stable disease and quality of life. In patients with recurrent endometrioid, ER/PR-positive disease, endocrine therapy alone or in combination with other targeted therapies are regimens that may be considered due to their low overall toxicity.

CHMP4B and VSP4A reverse GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis by cell membrane remodeling in endometrial carcinoma

BackgroundIn advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC), the current state of immuno- or targeted therapy remains in the clinical research phase. Our study aimed to explore the role of the ESCRT machinery in maintaining cell membrane integrity and reversing pyroptotic cell death. MethodsImmunohistochemistry, western blotting, and co-immunoprecipitation were performed to determine the expression and relationship between GSDMD, CHMP4B, and VPS4A. We employed techniques such as FITC Annexin V/propidium iodide staining, Ca2+ fluorescence intensity, IL-1β enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and lactate dehydrogenase release assay to detect pyroptosis in endometrial cancer cells. Plasma membrane perforations and CHMP4B/VPS4A puncta were observed through electron and fluorescence confocal microscopy. ResultsWe showed that GSDMD, CHMP4B, and VPS4A were differentially expressed in the pyroptotic EC xenograft mouse model group, as well as high, moderate, and mild expression in EC cells treated with LPS and nigericin compared to endometrial epithelial cells. Co-IP confirmed the interaction between GSDMD, CHMP4B, and VPS4A. We found that GSDMD knockdown reduced PI-positive cells, Ca2+ efflux, IL-1β, and LDH release, while CHMP4B and VPS4A depletion enhanced these indicators in HEC1A and AN3CA cells. Electron microscopy showed membrane perforations correspondingly decreased with inactivated GSDMD and increased or decreased after CHMP4B and VPS4A depletion or overexpression in EC cells. Fluorescence confocal microscopy detected CHMP4B protein puncta associated with VPS4A at the injured plasma membrane in GSDMDNT cells. ConclusionsWe preliminary evidenced that CHMP4B and VPS4A reverses GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis by facilitating cell membrane remodeling in endometrial carcinoma. Targeting CHMP4B related proteins may promote pyroptosis in endometrial tumors.

Fertility-preserving treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia patients with different molecular profiles

Objective: To investigate the impact of molecular classification and key oncogenes on the oncologic outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) receiving fertility-preserving treatment. Methods: Patients with EC and AEH undergoing progestin-based fertility-preserving treatment and receiving molecular classification as well as key oncogenes test at Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University from January 2021 to March 2023 were reviewed. Hysteroscopic lesion resection and endometrial biopsy were performed before initiating hormone therapy and every 3 months during the treatment to evaluate the efficacy. The risk factors which had impact on the treatment outcomes in EC and AEH patients were further analyzed. Results: Of the 171 patients analyzed, the median age was 32 years, including 86 patients with EC and 85 patients with AEH. The distribution of molecular classification was as follows: 157 cases (91.8%) were classified as having no specific molecular profile (NSMP); 9 cases (5.3%), mismatch repair deficient (MMR-d); 3 cases (1.8%), POLE-mutated; 2 cases (1.2%), p53 abnormal. No difference was found in the cumulative 40-week complete response (CR) rate between the patients having NSMP or MMR-d (61.6% vs 60.0%; P=0.593), while the patients having MMR-d had increased risk than those having NSMP to have recurrence after CR (50.0% vs 14.4%; P=0.005). Multi-variant analysis showed PTEN gene multi-loci mutation (HR=0.413, 95%CI: 0.259-0.658; P<0.001) and PIK3CA gene mutation (HR=0.499, 95%CI: 0.310-0.804; P=0.004) were associated with a lower cumulative 40-week CR rate, and progestin-insensitivity (HR=3.825, 95%CI: 1.570-9.317; P=0.003) and MMR-d (HR=9.014, 95%CI: 1.734-46.873; P=0.009) were independent risk factors of recurrence in EC and AEH patients. Conclusions: No difference in cumulative 40-week CR rate is found in the patients having NSMP or MMR-d who received progestin-based fertility-preserving treatment, where the use of hysteroscopy during the treatment might be the reason, while those having MMR-d have a higher risk of recurrence after CR. Oncogene mutation of PTEN or PIK3CA gene might be associated with a lower response to progestin treatment. The molecular profiles help predict the fertility-preserving treatment outcomes in EC and AEH patients.