Recurrent Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Research Articles

DECENNIAL ANALYSIS OF AVNRT ABLATION IN A SINGLE CENTRE

Abstract Background Transcatheter ablation represents the first line therapy for atrio–ventricular nodal re–entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Both radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation (CRYO) have been shown to be effective, with a better safety profile for CRYO. Data on very long–term efficacy are scarces. Purpose To review our experience in AVNRT ablation performed in the last ten years and evaluate safety, efficacy and very long–term outcome of RF and CRYO. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent AVNRT ablation (RF or CRYO) between January 2013 and May 2023 at our centre. The majority of procedures were performed under electro–anatomical mapping (EAM) guidance to reduce radiation exposure. Acute efficacy endpoint was defined as slow pathway ablation, while long–term outcome was defined as the absence of AVNRT recurrence. Results A total of 387 consecutive patients (60,5% F; mean age 48 ± 19 years) were included; CRYO was performed in 241 patients (62%), RF in 131 patients (34%), hybrid approach (CRYO+RF) in 15 patients (4%). AVNRT induction was obtained during EPS in 295 cases (76%), in 25,4% after isoprotenerol administration. No significant differences for baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups except for age (CRYO: 42,2 ± 18 years vs RF 57,19 ± 16,5 years p <0.001). In pediatric population CRYO was performed in 93% of procedures. Figure 1 shows the distribution of RF/CRYO over 10 years at our centre, with a trend of significant increase in CRYO utilizations in the last years. Acute success was achieved in all 387 cases (100%; delta WP 28,5 ± 23,1 ms, delta AVN ERP 72,4 ± 44,7 ms). No permanent AV block or major periprocedural complications occurred, however transient AH prolongation was observed in 0.8% in CRYO pts vs 2,8% RF pts. The mean follow–up was 73±45 months, range 6–129 months. Overall long–term success rate was 93,3%, ranging from 91,3 % in CRYO and 96,6% in RF. Recurrence occurred in 26 cases (6,7%) after a median time of 20 months (4–40months). Recurrent AVNRT were treated with RF in the majority of cases, CRYO in 6 procedures, hybrid in only 1 case. Conclusions Transcatheter ablation is a safe and effective therapy for AVNRT. Our very long–term outcome data confirmed very high success rate even after 10 years follow–up. The increasing choice for CRYO may be due to the increasing number of pediatric and young patient referred to our centre.

Effect of Direct Slow Pathway Capture Mapping–Guided Ablation on Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia

BackgroundDirect slow pathway capture (DSPC) mapping is a novel electrophysiological technique for detecting antegrade slow pathway input sites. However, the effect of DSPC mapping–guided ablation on atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is unknown. ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DSPC mapping–guided ablation in typical AVNRT patients. MethodsA multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 301 consecutive typical AVNRT patients. The outcomes in patients who underwent DSPC mapping–guided ablation (DSPC group) and those who underwent conventional anatomical ablation (conventional group) were compared. The conventional group was established before introducing DSPC mapping–guided ablation. Positive DSPC sites were defined as sites with a return cycle atrioventricular prolongation of ≥20 ms with high-output (10-20 V) pacing during tachycardia or the last paced beat of the atrial extrastimulation. ResultsAmong 116 patients in the DSPC group, 102 (88%) had positive DSPC sites, and 86 (74%) had a successful ablation at that site. Of the remaining 30 patients, 27 had a successful anatomical ablation. The DSPC group had a significantly lower frequency of radiofrequency applications and shorter total application time than the conventional group (median: 5.5 [IQR: 3-11] times vs 9 [IQR: 5-15] times, and 168 [IQR: 108-266] seconds vs 244 [IQR: 158-391] seconds, respectively; P < 0.01). Moreover, the DSPC group had a numerically lower incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations and AVNRT recurrences than the conventional group (0% vs 1.6%; P = 0.17, and 1.7% vs 3.2%; P = 0.43, respectively). ConclusionsDSPC mapping–guided ablation was associated with a lower operative time, which can reduce the risk of AV conduction injury in typical AVNRT.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Pediatric Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Impact of Age on Procedural Methods and Durable Success.

BackgroundCatheter‐based slow‐pathway modification (SPM) is the treatment of choice for symptomatic atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We sought to investigate the interactions between patient age and procedural outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing catheter‐based SPM for AVNRT.Methods and ResultsA retrospective cohort study was performed, including consecutive patients undergoing acutely successful SPM for AVNRT from 2008 to 2017. Those with congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and accessory pathways were excluded. Patients were stratified by age quartile at time of SPM. The primary outcome was AVNRT recurrence. A total of 512 patients underwent successful SPM for AVNRT. Age quartile 1 had 129 patients with a median age and weight of 8.9 years and 30.6 kg, respectively. Radiofrequency energy was used in 98% of cases. Follow‐up was available in 447 (87%) patients with a median duration of 0.8 years (interquartile range, 0.2–2.5 years). AVNRT recurred in 22 patients. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling identified atypical AVNRT (hazard ratio [HR], 5.83; 95% CI, 2.01–16.96; P=0.001), dual atrioventricular nodal only (HR, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.39–12.02; P=0.011), total radiofrequency lesions (HR, 1.06 per lesion; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12; P=0.032), and the use of a long sheath (HR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.23–10.03; P=0.010) as predictors of AVNRT recurrence; quartile 1 patients were not at higher risk of recurrence (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.10–1.97; P=0.29). Complete heart block requiring permanent pacing occurred in one quartile 2 patient at 14.9 years of age.ConclusionsPediatric AVNRT can be treated with radiofrequency‐SPM with high procedural efficacy and minimal risk of complications, including heart block. Atypical AVNRT and dual atrioventricular nodal physiology without inducible tachycardia remain challenging substrates.

Identifying an appropriate endpoint for cryoablation in children with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Is residual slow pathway conduction associated with recurrence?

Cryoablation is increasingly used to treat atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) due to its safety profile. However, cryoablation may have higher recurrence than radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and the optimal procedural endpoint remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to identify the association of cryoablation procedural endpoints with postprocedural AVNRT recurrence. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of pediatric patients following successful first-time cryoablation for AVNRT between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Preablation inducibility of AVNRT was recorded. Procedural endpoints, including slow pathway (SP) conduction (presence of jump or echo beats) with and without isoproterenol, were identified. Recurrence was established from clinical notes and/or direct patient contact. Of 256 patients, 147 (57%) were assessed on isoproterenol precryoablation, and 171 (47%) were assessed on isoproterenol postcryoablation. Mean cryolesion time was 2586 ± 1434 seconds. Following ablation, 104 (41%) had some evidence of residual SP conduction. With median follow-up time of 1.9 [0.7-3.7] years, recurrence occurred in 14 patients (5%). Complete elimination of SP conduction (with and without isoproterenol) had a hazard ratio for recurrence of 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-3.8; P = .68) on univariate analysis and 1.39 (95% CI 0.36-5.4; P = .63) on multivariate analysis (including demographics, ablation time, 8-mm cryocatheter, and baseline inducibility). The observed AVNRT recurrence rate after cryoablation was comparable to that of RFA. The presence of residual SP conduction was not associated with recurrence. This suggests that jump or single echo beat may be an acceptable endpoint in AVNRT cryoablation.

Very long-term outcomes after catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: How does cryoenergy differ from radiofrequency?

Either cryoenergy or radiofrequency can be used during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation. There is still limited data comparing their respective long-term efficacy (> 1 year). This study sought to compare the very long-term outcomes of AVNRT ablation using radiofrequency or cryotherapy. We retrospectively included all patients who had undergone a first AVNRT ablation in our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. The primary endpoint was recurrence of documented AVNRT. The study population consisted of 409 patients (274 females, mean age 49.9 year-old). Ablation was performed using cryoenergy in 260 patients and radiofrequency in 149. High acute procedural success rate (> 98%) was obtained and no permanent AV block was observed using both techniques. During a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 2.3 years, documented AVNRT recurrence occurred in 24 (9.2%) and 4 patients (2.7%) in the cryoablation and radiofrequency group respectively. The risk of AVNRT recurrence was significantly higher in the CA group as compared to the RF group (hazard ratio = 3.7, 95% CI: 1.3 to 5.9). Most of the recurrences after cryoablation occurred between 1- and 6-year follow-up (14/24; 58.3%), with 1/3rd of late recurrences after 3-year follow-up. In multivariable analysis, only Koch's triangle anatomical variant was associated with AVNRT recurrence after cryoablation (hazard ratio = 6.7, 95% CI: 2.7–16.3) ( Fig. 1 ). While AVNRT recurrence rates were similar at one year of follow-up regardless of the energy used, long-term efficacy appeared higher after radiofrequency ablation. Strikingly, recurrences occurred much later after cryotherapy compared to radiofrequency ablation.

Gender associated disparities in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A review article.

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmias. An understanding of gender-related differences in AVNRT epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, outcome, and complications can help guide a more effective diagnosis and treatment of the condition. The study aimed to perform a review of the available literature regarding all aspects of gender-related differences of AVNRT. We focused on all aspects of gender-related differences regarding AVNRT between men and women. A literature search was performed using Google Scholar, PubMed, Springer, Ovid, and Science Direct. Many investigations have demonstrated that the prevalence of AVNRT exhibited a twofold women-to-men predominance. The potential mechanism behind this difference due to sex hormones and autonomic tone. Despite being more common in women, there is a delay in offering and performing the first-line therapy (catheter ablation) compared to men. There were no significant gender-related discrepancies in patients who underwent ablation therapy for AVNRT, regarding the acute success rate of the procedure, long-term success rate, and recurrence of AVNRT. AVNRT is more common in women due to physiological factors such as sex hormones and autonomic tone. Catheter ablation is equally safe and efficacious in men and women; however, the time between the onset of symptoms and ablation is significantly prolonged in women. It is important for the medical community to be aware of this discrepancy and to strive to eliminate such disparities that are not related to patients' choices.

An unusual presentation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Introduction: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most frequent supraventricular tachycardia, commonly manifesting as autolimited paroxysmal episodes of rapid regular palpitations that exceed 150 beats per minute (bpm), dizziness and pounding neck sensation. Case presentation: We present a case of a male patient, 70 years old, with ischemic heart disease and slow-fast AVNRT treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in March 2019, with regular 6-months follow-ups. He was readmitted in our department in November 2020 for rest dyspnea and incessant fluttering sensation in the neck, without palpitations. The event electrocardiogram (ECG) was initially interpreted by general cardiologist as accelerated junctional rhythm, 75 bpm. Due to the persistence of symptoms and ECG findings, a differential diagnosis between reentry and focal automaticity was imposed. The response to vagal maneuvers and Holter ECG monitoring characteristics provided valuable information. We suspected recurrent slow ventricular rate typical AVNRT, which was confirmed by electrophysiological study and we successfully performed the RFCA of the slow intranodal pathway. Conclusion: AV nodal reentry tachycardia may have an unusual presentation, occurring in elder male patients with structural heart disease. Antiarrhythmic drugs can promote reentry in this kind of patients. In cases of slow ventricular rate, vagal maneuvers and Holter ECG monitoring can help with the differential diagnosis. The arrhythmia can be successfully treated with RFCA with special caution regarding the risk of AV block.

Persistence of Palpitations After Slow Pathway Modification for AVNRT in Young People.

Symptoms are the most common indication for ablation in children with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). After the procedure, patients may continue to report palpitations. The objective of this study was to quantify the risk and duration of palpitations after pediatric slow pathway modification as well as demographic and technical associations. This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients at a pediatric center who underwent slow pathway modification for AVNRT from 2012 to 2018. Patients with a prior ablation attempt or congenital heart disease were excluded. Palpitations were documented in 35% of patients after ablation. Neither post-ablation echo beats nor other evidence of residual dual AV nodal physiology were associated with a higher risk of post-ablation palpitations. Of the 35 patients with post-ablation palpitations, the median time to resolution of palpitations was 48months. Acute procedural success was achieved in all 100 cases. There were two recurrences of AVNRT during long-term follow-up and one instance of ectopic atrial tachycardia (3% SVT recurrence). Palpitations after AVNRT ablation occurred in approximately one-third of cases, despite a low recurrence of true arrhythmia. Prior to ablation, patients and families should be counseled that post-ablation palpitations are common and AVNRT recurrence is rare.

Very long-term outcomes after catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: How does cryoenergy differ from radiofrequency?

Either cryoenergy or radiofrequency can be used during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation. There are still limited data comparing their respective long-term efficacy (>1 year). This study sought to compare the very long-term outcomes of AVNRT ablation using radiofrequency or cryotherapy. We retrospectively included all patients who had undergone a first AVNRT ablation in our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. The primary endpoint was recurrence of documented AVNRT. The study population consisted of 409 patients (274 females; mean age, 49.9 years). Ablation was performed using cryoenergy in 260 patients and radiofrequency in 149. High acute procedural success rate (>98%) was obtained and no permanent AV block was observed using both techniques. During a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 2.3 years, documented AVNRT recurrence occurred in 24 (9.2%) and 4 patients (2.7%) in the cryoablation (CA) and radiofrequency (RF) group, respectively. The risk of AVNRT recurrence was significantly higher in the CA group as compared with the RF group (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.9). Most of the recurrences after CA occurred between 1- and 6-year follow-up (14/24; 58.3%), with one-third of late recurrences after 3-year follow-up. In multivariable analysis, only Koch's triangle anatomical variant was associated with AVNRT recurrence after CA (HR = 6.7; 95% CI, 2.7-16.3). While AVNRT recurrence rates were similar at 1 year of follow-up regardless of the energy used, long-term efficacy appeared higher after radiofrequency ablation. Strikingly, recurrences occured much later after cryotherapy compared with radiofrequency ablation.

Efficacy of cryo-ablation during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Because of the low atrioventricular (AV) block risk during cryo-ablation, it has become possible to treat AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) during arrhythmia. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of performing cryo-ablation for AVNRT during arrhythmia. Twenty-three patients with AVNRT treated by cryo-ablation during arrhythmia were enrolled. Cryo-ablation was performed gradually from the bottom to above the paraseptal tricuspid annulus until AVNRT was terminated. If the slow pathway was not eliminated despite cryo-ablation terminating the AVNRT, additional cryo-ablation was performed at a higher site until the slow pathway elimination was achieved. AVNRT was terminated by cryo-ablation in all 23 patients. However, the slow pathway was only eliminated in 6 patients. Among the remaining 17 patients, the slow pathway could not be ablated because transient AV block occurred during cryo-ablation at a higher site in 8 patients; however, cryo-ablation at a higher site successfully eliminated the slow pathway in the other 9 patients. In these 9 patients, the distance from the bottom of tricuspid annulus to the site of slow pathway elimination was significantly longer than that from bottom of tricuspid annulus to the AVNRT termination site (20.1 ± 5.3 vs 14.7 ± 4.5mm: p = 0.027). During follow-up, AVNRT recurrence was confirmed in 3 patients. In 1 of these 3 patients, even a slow pathway elimination was achieved by cryo-ablation at the AVNRT termination site. The AVNRT termination site may not be the ideal site for performing cryo-ablation.

Left sided ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Re-entrant Tachycardia: Frequency, Characteristics and Outcomes.

BackgroundLeft-sided ablation, targeting left inferior AV nodal extensions, is thought to be necessary for success in a small proportion of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablations; however Indian data are scarce in this regard.MethodsConsecutive cases of AVNRT undergoing slow pathway ablation in a single centre over an 18-month period were retrospectively analyzed. Left-sided ablation at the posteroseptal mitral annulus was performed if right-sided ablation failed to abolish AVNRT.ResultsFrom January 2017 to June 2018, out of 215 consecutive supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) cases, 154 (71.6%) were AVNRT (47.1 ± 13.1 years, 46.1% male). Trans-septal ablation was required in 5 (3.2%) cases (mean age 48.8 ± 9.4 years; 4 female, 1 male); all with typical (slow-fast) form of AVNRT. Compared with cases needing only right-sided ablation, radiofrequency time (50.8 ± 16.9 vs. 9.9 ± 8.5 min; p = 0.005) and procedure time (166.0 ± 35.0 vs 79.6 ± 35.9 min; p = 0.004) were significantly longer for trans-septal cases, while baseline intervals and tachycardia cycle length were not significantly different. Junctional ectopy was seen in only 2 of the 5 cases during left-sided ablation, but acute success (non-inducibility) was obtained in 3 cases. There were no instances of AV block. Over mean follow-up of 12.2 ± 4.0 months, clinical recurrence of AVNRT occurred in one case, while others remained arrhythmia-free without medication.ConclusionLeft-sided ablation was required in a small proportion of AVNRT ablations. Trans-septal approach targeting the posteroseptal mitral annulus was safe and yielded good mid-term clinical success.

Recurrent single echo beats after cryoablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: The pediatric population

BackgroundCryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is effective and safe with a reported limitation of lower success and higher recurrence rates. We have observed cases in which slow pathway conduction was eliminated as demonstrated by atrial extra-stimulus testing within 1 min of cryo-energy delivery but returned following tissue rewarming. Frequently, slow pathway conduction persisted despite multiple acutely successful lesions over a broad anatomic region. We aimed to determine if return of slow pathway conduction after elimination during cryoablation represents a risk for recurrent AVNRT with the same intermediate term results as slow pathway ablation. We hypothesize that remnant single echo beats in the absence of sustained slow pathway conduction and inducible AVNRT is an acceptable end point after clear slow pathway elimination during cryoablation. MethodsRetrospective chart review of patients undergoing attempted slow pathway ablation for AVNRT using solely cryoablation between January 2015–January 2018. ResultsForty-four patients met inclusion criteria with at-least 2 features of dual AVN physiology. 19 patients had return of slow pathway conduction shortly after clear elimination during cryoablation (Group A) while 25 did not (Group B). All in Group A had recurrent single echo beats but none had sustained slow pathway conduction at the end of the procedure nor AVNRT recurrence at 1 year. ConclusionRecurrent single echo beats with absent sustained slow pathway conduction and non-inducible AVNRT may be an acceptable endpoint for slow pathway ablation of AVNRT using cryoablation when there is elimination of slow pathway demonstrated during energy delivery.

Extremely late recurrences (≥3 years) of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Electrophysiological characteristics of the index and repeat ablation procedures

BackgroundCatheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the characteristics of extremely late (>3 years) recurrences of AVNRT after a successful initial ablation are not fully elucidated. We aimed to explore the electrophysiological characteristics of extremely late recurrences of AVNRT after a successful ablation. MethodsFrom 1991 to 2018, 3311 patients (mean age: 48.7 ± 17.4 years; men: 1328 [40.1%]) who underwent catheter ablation for AVNRT were investigated. Baseline characteristics of the patients, recurrence status, and detailed electrophysiological parameters of the index and repeat ablation procedures were obtained for analysis. ResultsAfter a mean follow-up period of 129.5 ± 58.0 months, 65 (2.0%) patients underwent repeat ablation for recurrences of AVNRT, of whom 17 (0.5%) presented with extremely late recurrences. The incidence of transient AV block was significantly higher in patients with extremely late recurrences (5.9%) than in those without recurrences (1.9%) but lower than that in patients with recurrences within <3 years (12.5%, P < .001). In addition, among patients with extremely late recurrences of AVNRT, the atrial–His bundle interval was significantly longer (99.1 ± 23.4 vs. 76.5 ± 13.1 ms, P < .01) and the need for intravenous isoproterenol and/or atropine for the induction of AVNRT (88.2% vs. 47.1%, P = .03) was higher in the repeat ablation procedure than in the index ablation procedure. ConclusionRecurrences of AVNRT can occur 3 years after a successful initial ablation. The electrophysiological features of the index and repeat ablation procedures differed between patients with extremely late recurrences of AVNRT and those with recurrences within <3 years.

High incidence of atrial fibrillation after successful catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a 15.5-year follow-up

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common type of supraventricular tachycardia. Slow pathway (SP) ablation is the treatment of choice with a high acute success rate and a negligible periprocedural risk. However, long-term outcome data are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcome and arrhythmia free survival after SP ablation. In this study, 534 consecutive patients with AVNRT, who underwent SP ablation between 1994 and 1999 were included. During a mean follow-up of 15.5 years, 101 (18.9%) patients died unrelated to the procedure or any arrhythmia. Data were collected by completing a questionnaire and/or contacting patients. Clinical information was obtained from 329 patients (61.6%) who constitute the final study cohort. During the electrophysiological study, sustained 1:1 slow AV nodal pathway conduction was eliminated in all patients. Recurrence of AVNRT was documented in 9 patients (2.7%), among those 7 patients underwent a successful repeat ablation procedure. New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) was documented in 39 patients (11.9%) during follow-up. Pre-existing arterial hypertension (odds ratio 2.61, 95% CI 1.14–5.97, p = 0.023), age (odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.09, p = 0.003) and the postinterventional AH interval (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.04, p = 0.038) predicted the occurrence of AF. The present long-term observational study after successful SP ablation of AVNRT confirms its clinical value reflected by low recurrence and complication rates. The unexpectedly high incidence of new-onset AF (11.9%) may impact long-term follow-up and requires further clinical attention.

Japan ablation registry: cryoablation in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (“JARCANRET study”): results from large multicenter retrospective investigation

Cryoenergy has been demonstrated to be a safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation in patients with AVNRT. A multicenter retrospective study was performed. Two hundred eighty-three consecutive patients with AVNRT underwent cryoablation. Cryomapping at - 30°C and - 80°C was performed to predict cryoablation outcome and ascertain antegrade conduction. Cryoenergy was delivered subsequently at the same spot (cryoablation at - 80°C) for 240s. Ablation procedure was acutely successful in 281 out of 283 patients (99.3%). Of note, 22 patients (10.1%) had transient AV block during the cryoablation, but no injurious effects on AV conduction were provoked during cryomapping. During a follow-up period of 367 ± 35days, the recurrence rate was 3.9% (11 out of 281). There were no significant differences among the patients with a complete elimination of slow pathway conduction, AH jump without an echo beat, and AH jump with a single echo beat, in terms of the long-term recurrence of AVNRT. Cryoablation of AVNRT appears to be effective both acutely and during the long-term with a minimal risk of unwanted injuries to the conduction system. It seems to be important to monitor the antegrade conduction during cryoenergy applications, even when cryomapping demonstrates a safe location for cryoablation. The recurrence rate of AVNRT did not differ according to the properties of the residual slow pathway conduction.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by means of flexible-tip irrigated catheters.

Irrigated-tip ablation catheters increase safety and efficacy of ablation procedures, but their use in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of AVNRT by means of the novel flexible-tip open-irrigated catheter FlexAbility™ and a 3D electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system. This is a single-center and single-operator study on 80 patients referred for AVNRT catheter ablation. Outcome included acute and long-term procedural success as well as complications reported over a median follow-up of 19months (interquartile range 6-24months). Acute success was achieved in all 80 patients. One procedure-related major complication, involving the vascular access, occurred. Mean fluoroscopy time was 106 ± 71s. One patient (1.2%) suffered long-term AVNRT recurrence. Five patients (6.2%) underwent ablation for AVNRT combined with ablation for other clinical arrhythmias. Irrigated RF ablation of AVNRT by means of the novel flexible-tip open-irrigated catheter associated to 3D EAM system is effective and safe. Success rates are comparable to those of other techniques. Complication rate is very low.

Supraventricular tachycardia of the sick, a unique entity.

This study explored a unique form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in which certain acutely ill patients have a first episode of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with a short RP interval. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients at a single institution who developed SVT with short RP and yielded 19 patients. None of the 19 patients had a prior history of AVNRT or any other arrhythmia. The mean age was 58 years, the majority of patients were male (13/19), and there was a presence of hypertension (10/19), diabetes mellitus (5/19), hyperlipidemia (7/19), congestive heart failure (2/19), coronary artery disease (3/19), obstructive sleep apnea (2/19), and active cancer (8/19). The reasons for admission were planned surgery (8/19), sepsis (8/19), drug abuse (2/19), and neurological disorder (2/19). The AVNRT either terminated spontaneously or following the administration of adenosine. The patients were treated with amiodarone (12/19), metoprolol (6/19), or diltiazem (1/19). Follow-up (mean: 370 days) details revealed that patients were on amiodarone (3/19), metoprolol (6/19), were not taking any cardiac medication (5/19), or had passed away (5/19). Only 1 patient had a recurrence of AVNRT, and none of the patients required ablation therapy. 'AVNRT of the sick' has not been previously described in the medical literature, to our knowledge. It can be successfully treated with medications and the chance of recurrence after resolution of the acute illness is small.

Value of an old school approach: safety and long-term success of radiofrequency current catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children and young adolescents.

Radiofrequency current energy (RFC) ablation is still considered as the gold standard for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Success-rates for AVNRT ablation vary irrespective of the ablation technology and strategy. This study aimed to access safety, efficacy, and long-term outcome of RFC catheter ablation for the treatment of AVNRT in children and adolescents aged < 19years with special focus on modulation versus ablation of the AV nodal slow pathway (SP). A total number of 1143 patients (pts) < 19years were referred for invasive electrophysiological testing due to paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Diagnosis of AVNRT was confirmed in 412 pts, and RFC-guided ablation was attempted in 386 pts (age 13.0 ± 3.5years). No permanent complications were observed. RFC application resulted in SP-ablation in 171/386 (44.3%) and in SP modulation in 208/386 (53.9%) children, whereas attempts for RFC treatment failed in 7 pts. Follow-up was completed for 396/412 patients (96.1%). Within a mean follow-up period of 54.9 ± 39.7months, in 51/379 pts (13.5%) AVNRT recurrence was observed. The median time until tachycardia recurrence was 19.5months. No difference for AVNRT recurrence was found comparing SP ablation versus SP modulation (p> 0.05), whereas the recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with non-inducible SVT and therefore empiric SP treatment as compared to patients with inducible AVNRT (p= 0.01). RFC-guided ablation for AVNRT in children and adolescents is safe and leads to an acceptable long-term freedom from recurrences. SP modulation and SP ablation resulted in comparable acute and long-term success rates. Late AVNRT recurrences can occur even after years of freedom from tachycardia-related symptoms.

Double loop reentrant atrial tachycardia following ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

We report a patient with a history of multiple ablations for recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia who developed an atrial tachycardia four years after his last procedure. Subsequent electroanatomical mapping demonstrated double loop macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia consistent with a roof dependent flutter and a perimitral flutter. We successfully terminated the tachycardia by targeting isthmuses at sites of prior ablation.

A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and disposable costs of different catheter ablation methods for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BackgroundCatheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a commonly performed electrophysiology (EP) procedure. Few data exist comparing conventional (CONV) versus novel ablation strategies from both clinical and direct cost perspectives. We sought to investigate the disposable costs and clinical outcomes associated with three different ablation methodologies used in the ablation of AVNRT.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of AVNRT ablations performed at Augusta University Medical Center from 2006 to 2014. A total of 183 patients were identified. Three different ablation techniques were compared: CONV manual radiofrequency (RF) (n=60), remote magnetic navigation (RMN)-guided RF (n=67), and cryoablation (CRYO) (n=56).ResultsBaseline demographics did not differ between the three groups except for a higher prevalence of cardiomyopathy in the RMN group (p<0.01). The clinical end point of interest was recurrent AVNRT following the index ablation procedure. A significantly higher number of recurrent AVNRT cases occurred in the CRYO group as compared to CONV and RMN (p=0.003; OR =7.75) groups. Cost-benefit analysis showed both CONV and RMN to be dominant compared to CRYO. Cost-minimization analysis demonstrated the least expensive ablation method to be CONV (mean disposable catheter cost = CONV US$2340; CRYO US$3515; RMN US$5190). Despite comparable clinical outcomes, the incremental cost of RMN over CONV averaged US$3094 per procedure.ConclusionAVNRT ablation using either CONV or RMN techniques is equally effective and associated with lower AVNRT recurrence rates than CRYO. CONV ablation carries significant disposable cost savings as compared to RMN, despite similar efficacy.