Recurrent Aortic Regurgitation Research Articles

Long-term outcomes and risk factors for reoperation after subaortic stenosis resection in children and adults

Abstract Background Sub-valvular aortic stenosis (SAS) is an extremely heterogeneous form of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, which can lead to aortic valve damage. Although corrective surgery is considered the most effective treatment, rates of recurrence and reoperation are still high. Previous studies have focused on predictors of reoperation in several subgroups of patients with SAS, but rarely in the whole population of patients with SAS. Purpose We sought to describe long-term outcomes after SAS resection and to determine the predictors of reoperation after successful primary resection. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent SAS resection between 1994 and 2021 at our institution with at least 12 months’ follow-up. Patients with a single-ventricle physiology and idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were excluded. Demographic, surgical and echocardiographic data were analyzed. Outcomes were reoperation after successful primary resection, death and morbidities, including postoperative complete heart block and aortic regurgitation (AR) grade at latest follow-up. Results Seventy-six patients (paediatric, n = 72 and adult, n = 4) who underwent SAS resection were included in the analysis. Median length of postoperative follow-up was 11.1 years (IQR range: 7.3 – 15.7 years), with two late deaths. Reoperation due to recurrent obstruction or severe AR occurred in 24 patients (31.6%). Median time to reoperation was 7.5 years (IQR range: 3.6 – 11 years). Overall freedom from reoperation at 5 years and 10 years was 84.6% and 69.1% respectively. Gender and association with other cardiac defects did not differ significantly between those with reoperation and those without. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of reoperation were age at first surgery younger than 5 years (HR 3.54, 95% CI 1.06 – 11.83; P = 0.040) and tunnel-type lesions (HR 4.42, 95% CI 1.70 – 11.51; P = 0.002). Three patients (3.9%) had complete heart block and required placement of an implantable pacemaker. Following SAS resection, progression of AR was common (39/68, 57.3%) but only 5 patients (7.3%) developed sufficient regurgitation to require surgical repair or replacement. Conclusions Reoperation is not infrequent after surgical relief of SAS and reaches a plateau after 10 years. Younger age at first surgery and tunnel-type SAS independently predict reoperation. Progression of AR after corrective surgery of SAS is common, but fortunately only a minority of patients develop hemodynamically significant AR requiring reintervention.

The Use of the Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft for Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Still an Option?

The indications for cryopreserved allografts in aortic valve replacement are still debatable. We aim to identify factors influencing early and long-term durability of the aortic homograft and to define subgroups of patients with an improved long-term quality of life, survival, and freedom from structural valve degeneration (SVD). We evaluated our series of 210 patients who underwent allograft implantation with a retrospective cohort study design over a period of 20 years. Endpoints were overall mortality, cardiac mortality related to SVD, the incidence of SVD, reoperation, and a composite endpoint comprising major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which includes cardiac death both related and not related to SVD, subsequent aortic valve surgery, new or recurrent infection of implanted allograft, recurrent aortic regurgitation, rehospitalization for heart failure, an increase in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of ≥1, or cerebrovascular events. The primary indication for surgery was endocarditis (48%), which was also a predisposing factor for increased cardiac mortality. Overall mortality was 32.4% with a 27% incidence of SVD and mortality associated with SVD of 13.8%. Reoperation occurred in 33.8% and MACCEs in 54.8%. Long-term NYHA functional class and echocardiographic parameters improved over time. Statistical analysis demonstrated that root replacement technique and adult age were protective factors for SVD. We found no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcomes analyzed between women of childbearing age who had children after surgery and the rest of the women. The cryopreserved allograft is still a valid option in aortic valve replacement, providing acceptable durability and clinical outcomes with optimal hemodynamic performance. SVD is influenced by the implantation technique. Women of childbearing age might have additional benefits from this procedure.

Comparison of aortic valve repair techniques with single and double ring annuloplasties.

For patients with isolated aortic regurgitation, a double sub- and supravalvular annuloplasty has been shown to reduce recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve repair compared with a single subvalvular annuloplasty. The objective of this study was to compare the geometrical and dynamic properties of a single- and double ring annuloplasty in an in vitro model. Eighteen aortic roots from 80 kg pigs were randomized into a control, single ring, and double ring group. Experiments were conducted in a pulsatile in vitro model. Hydrodynamics, radial force measurements at annular and sinotubular level, and 2D echographic imaging were obtained. Both the single- and double ring annuloplasty downsized the aortic annulus and sinotubular junction significantly, and increased the coaptation height. The double ring annuloplasty showed an additional significant increase in coaptation height compared with the single ring (8.5 (0.9) mm to 9.8 (0.8) mm, p < 0.01). The single ring annuloplasty reduced radial forces at both levels, whereas the double ring annuloplasty showed the greatest force reduction of the sinotubular junction. By treating the whole functional aortic annulus, encompassing both the aortic annulus and the sinotubular junction, a greater force reduction is observed. A subvalvular annuloplasty alone is efficient in reducing aortic annulus diameter and increasing coaptation height, however, by treating the sinotubular junction as well, an additional effect is observed on coaptation height, creating a more efficient stabilization. Reduction of annular force-distensibility ratio with the double ring annuloplasty compared with the native controls indicate a sustained stabilizing effect.

Aortic Valve Reconstruction With Autologous Pericardium Versus a Bioprosthesis: The Ozaki Procedure inPerspective.

Background We assessed the Ozaki procedure, aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium, with respect to its learning curve, hemodynamic performance, and durability compared with a stented bioprosthesis. Methods and Results From January 2007 to January 2016, 776 patients underwent an Ozaki procedure at Toho University Ohashi Medical Center. Learning curves, aortic regurgitation (AR), and peak gradient, assessed by serial echocardiograms, valve rereplacement, and survival were investigated. Valve performance and durability were compared with 627 1:1 propensity-matched patients receiving stented bovine pericardial valves implanted from 1982 to 2011 at Cleveland Clinic. Learning curves were observed for aortic clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, AR prevalence, and early mortality. Decreased aortic clamp time was observed over the first 300 cases. New surgeons performing parts of the procedure after case 400 resulted in a slight increase in aortic clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. Among matched patients, the Ozaki cohort had more AR than the PERIMOUNT cohort (severe AR at 1 and 6 years, 0.58% and 3.6% versus 0.45% and 1.0%, respectively; P[trend]=0.006), although with a steep learning curve. Peak gradient showed the opposite trend: 14 and 17 mm Hg for Ozaki and 24 and 28mm Hg for PERIMOUNT at these times (P[trend]<0.001). Freedom from rereplacement was similar (P=0.491). Survival of the Ozaki cohort was 85% at 6years. Conclusions Patients undergoing the Ozaki procedure had lower gradients but more recurrent AR than those receiving PERIMOUNT bioprostheses. Although recurrent AR is concerning, results confirm low risk and good midterm performance of the Ozaki procedure, supporting its continued use.

Surgical Interventions for Late Aortic Valve Regurgitation Associated with Continuous Flow-Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Experience Gained and Lessons Learned.

This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of surgical interventions for symptomatic moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation (AR), including aortic valve replacement (AVR) and repair (AVP), in 184 patients who underwent continuous flow-left ventricular assist device (Cf-LVAD) implantation as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) between November 2007 and April 2020. Ten patients (median age, 34 (25-41) years; 60% men) underwent surgical interventions (AVR, n = 6; AVP, n = 4) late after cf-LVAD implantation. The median duration after the device implantation was 34 (24-44) months. Three patients required additional tricuspid valve repair. Aortic valve suturing resulted in severe recurrent AR 6 months postoperatively, due to leaflet cutting in one patient. Seven patients with AVR survived without regurgitation during the study period, except for one non-survivor complicated by liver failure due to postoperative right heart failure. Therefore, six patients after AVP (n = 4) and AVR (n = 2) underwent successful heart transplantation 7 (4-13) months after aortic intervention. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in overall survival through 5 years after cf-LVAD implantation, regardless of the surgical AV intervention chosen (log-rank test, p = 0.86). In conclusion, surgical interventions (AVR or AVP) for patients with an ongoing cf-LVAD are safe, effective, and viable options.

Reimplantation versus aortic ring annuloplasty in bicuspid valve with borderline aortic root ectasia.

ObjectiveBicuspid aortic valve repair can be achieved with the reimplantation technique or external ring annuloplasty. Reimplantation could be an “overtreatment” in nonaneurysmatic aortic roots. External ring repair, on the contrary, could be an “undertreatment” in dilated roots. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the 2 techniques in patients with borderline aortic root dimensions, analyzing early results, aortic regurgitation recurrence, and root dilation over time.MethodsWe selected patients with bicuspid aortic valve and ectasia of the aortic root (40-48 mm) who underwent reimplantation or external ring repair. We compared the 2 techniques, analyzing immediate postoperative and follow-up echocardiography. Only patients with at least 1 year of follow-up were included.ResultsWe obtained 2 groups of 21 patients (reimplantation) and 22 patients (external ring). Median follow-up time was 36 (40) months. There were no deaths during the follow-up periods. Three patients required reoperation in the external ring group because of recurrent aortic regurgitation, with a freedom from reoperation of 77.8% at 7 years (no reoperation was required in the reimplantation group). In the external ring group, we observed an immediate postoperative root diameter reduction and no significative expansion during follow-up (+0.4 mm/year, P = .184).ConclusionsExcellent results of reimplantation technique are confirmed and stable over time. Root diameter seems to remain stable over time when external ring technique was performed. The greater incidence of reoperation after external ring could be due to the progressive learning curve (256 patients vs 52 patients). Longer follow-up studies are needed.

Twenty-five years' experience with root remodeling and bicuspid aortic valve repair.

BackgroundBicuspid aortic valves may be associated with ascending aortic aneurysm, or develop severe aortic regurgitation with variable aortic dilatation. If aortic dilatation involves the root, valve-preserving root replacement is a treatment option, and we prefer root remodeling for this purpose. The objective of this study is to review our experience encompassing 25 years.MethodsBetween November 1995 and August 2021, 472 patients (429 male; age 9–80 years; mean 48±13 years) were treated by bicuspid aortic valve repair and root remodeling. Aortic regurgitation was present in 322 cases. The primary indication for surgery was aortic regurgitation (n=317), aortic aneurysm (n=143) or acute type A aortic dissection (n=12). In 271 instances, a suture annuloplasty was added. Cusp calcification was present beyond the raphe in 80 cases, and a pericardial patch was used for partial cusp replacement in 44 cases. Follow-up was 92.8% complete with a mean of 71±68 months (median 61 months).ResultsHospital mortality was 0.4% and survival at 20 years was 76.9%. Reoperation was necessary for recurrent aortic regurgitation in 26 patients; nine patients underwent reoperation for stenosis. The overall freedom of reoperation was 90.5% after ten years and 76.6% after 20 years. Annuloplasty was associated with a higher proportion of competent aortic valves at discharge (P=0.001), and had no effect on ten-year freedom from reoperation. The use of a pericardial patch for cusp repair was a predictor for reoperation (P=0.003). The presence of cusp calcification was a predictor for the development of aortic stenosis and reoperation (P=0.032).ConclusionsBicuspid aortic valve repair combined with root remodeling leads to excellent ten- and 20-year results. Cusp calcification and partial cusp replacement are associated with an increased probability of valve failure requiring reoperation.

Significance of Effective Height and Mechanism of Regurgitation in Tricuspid Aortic Valve Repair

BackgroundIsolated repair of the regurgitant tricuspid aortic valve has become an increasingly practiced alternative to replacement, even though durability data are scarce. We analyzed the midterm results of tricuspid aortic valve repair to determine whether the mechanism of regurgitation or operative technique influences the results. MethodsBetween December 1997 and August 2014, 264 patients underwent isolated tricuspid aortic valve repair in our institution. The mean age was 59 ± 16 years; 77% (n = 203) were male. Clinical and operative data were recorded. The patients were observed clinically and echocardiographically. ResultsSurvival was 76.7% ± 3.5% after 10 years and 57.2% ± 11.5% after 15 years (median, 224 months). Intraoperative measurement of effective height was significantly associated with improved long-term survival (P = .001). Cumulative freedom from reoperation was 88.1% ± 2.1% after 5 years and 73.3% ± 4.2% after 10 years. Freedom from recurrent aortic regurgitation 2+ was 85.9% ± 5.2% after 5 years and 66.9% ± 5.2% after 10 years. Freedom from reoperation was significantly higher in patients with cusp prolapse compared with retraction as the primary regurgitation mechanism (P = .041). The use of circular annuloplasty had no significant influence on survival or durability. ConclusionsLong-term survival after tricuspid aortic valve repair is good, considering the age of the patients. Repair of cusp retraction has a poorer durability compared with repair of prolapse. The use of effective height in tricuspid aortic valve repair is associated with improved survival.

Early results after aortic annuloplasty with a complete external Dacron band

ObjectiveThis study evaluates the early results of our initial experience with aortic annuloplasty using a complete external Dacron band in the setting of type Ic or type II aortic regurgitation (AR).MethodsFrom May 2017 to August 2019, 16 patients (88% bicuspid aortic valves, no patients with connective tissue disorders) underwent aortic annuloplasty with an external complete Dacron band. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 100% complete. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up averaged 24.4 ± 9.3 and 15.1 ± 8.3 months, respectively.ResultsMean cardiopulmonary and cross-clamp times were 105 ± 15 (72–127) and 86 ± 15 (51–113) min, respectively. Early and late mortality was 0%, with no incidents of endocarditis or cerebrovascular events during the follow-up. Two patients were re-operated during the follow-up, one due recurrent aortic regurgitation (12 months after the first operation) yielding a freedom from reoperation due to AR at 1 year and 3 years of 100% ± 0% and 93.3% ± 5.7%, respectively. Based on the latest echocardiogram, five patients had either none or trivial AR, six had mild AR, and three had mild-to-moderate AR.ConclusionsThe early clinical and echocardiographic results after using a complete external Dacron band are promising; however, more data and longer follow-up are needed to determine its role in annular management during aortic valve repair.

Late results of aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation.

The objectives were to analyze the long-term outcomes of tricuspid aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation and the impact of different annuloplasty techniques. The study cohort consists of 127 consecutive patients who received aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation in the tricuspid aortic valve between 1996 and 2019 in our institution. Exclusion criteria were aorta dilatation (≥45mm), connective tissue disease, active endocarditis, type A dissection, and rheumatic disease. Mean age of patients was 55.6±16years, and 80% were male. Median follow-up was 6.4years. Time-to-event analysis was performed, as well as risk of death, reoperation, and aortic regurgitation recurrence. Cusp repair was performed in 117 patients (92%), and annuloplasty was performed in 126 patients (99%) with Cabrol stitch (73%), reimplantation technique (19.7%), or ring annuloplasty (6.3%). There was no hospital mortality. At 10 and 14years, overall survival was 81%±5% and 71%±6%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation was 80%±5% and 73%±6%, respectively. Age and left coronary cusp repair were independent predictors of reoperation. Freedom from recurrent severe aortic regurgitation (>2+) was 73%±5% and 66%±7% at 10 and 12years, respectively. Age, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and patch repair were independent predictors of recurrent aortic regurgitation. Type of annuloplasty had no impact on survival or reoperation. Aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation in the tricuspid aortic valve is a safe procedure, and durability at 14years is acceptable. In this study, the annuloplasty technique did not influence repair durability as was found in bicuspid aortic valve repair or aortic valve-sparing surgery. Severity of cusp pathology seems to be the main determinant of repair durability.

Fate of mild-to-moderate bicuspid aortic valve disease untreated during ascending aorta replacement.

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect and it is responsible for an increased risk of developing aortic valve and ascending aorta complications. In case of mild to moderate BAV disease in patients undergoing supracoronary ascending aorta replacement, it is unclear whether a concomitant aortic valve replacement should be performed. From June 2002 to January 2020, 75 patients with mild-to-moderate BAV regurgitation (±mild-to-moderate stenosis) who underwent isolated supracoronary ascending aorta replacement were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 100% complete (mean: 7.4 ± 3.9 years, max: 16.4). Kaplan-Meier estimates were employed to analyze long-term survival. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) for time to reoperation, recurrence of aortic regurgitation (AR) ≥3+ and aortic stenosis (AS) greater than moderate, with death as competing risk, were computed. There was no hospital mortality and no cardiac death occurred. Overall survival at 12 years was 97.4 ± 2.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI: 83.16-99.63). At follow-up there were no cases of aortic root surgery whereas three patients underwent AV replacement. At 12 years the CIF of reoperation was 2.6 ± 2.5%, 95% CI [0.20-11.53]. At follow-up, AR 3+/4+ was present in 1 pt and AS greater than moderate in 3. At 12 years the CIF of AR more than 2+/4+ was 5.1 ± 4.98% and of AS more than moderate 6.9 ± 3.8%. In our study mild to moderate regurgitation of a BAV did not do significantly worse at least up to 10 years after isolated supracoronary ascending aorta replacement.

In patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic root replacement, is reimplantation superior to remodelling?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic root replacement, is reimplantation superior to remodelling? The purpose of this best evidence topic was to re-review the updated evidence that has become available in the near decade since the previous review published in 2011. Altogether more than 300 papers were found using the reported search, of which 8 papers represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The included studies have significant limitations relating to low-level evidence study design, variable outcome collection and limited significance testing with direct comparison. Long-term outcomes such as survival, recurrence of aortic regurgitation and valve reintervention were largely equal between the two procedures across the studies. This review, updated from the previous best evidence topic, continues to suggest that there are no clear recommendations or even consensus to guide clinical decision-making when choosing between remodelling or reimplantation approaches to valve-sparing aortic root replacement. To date, no study provides strong clinical benefit to favour either procedure in terms of perioperative outcomes, medium-long term survival or reintervention of the aortic valve. As such, procedure selection should be based upon patient factors and valve evaluation, combined with surgeon preference and experience.

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement after type A aortic dissection repairs.

Aortic root reoperation after aortic dissection repair sometimes requires aortic root replacement. A valve-preserving technique should be applied when the aortic cusp is normal. Valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique resolves aortic valve regurgitation, root dilatation, and pseudoaneurysm in the proximal anastomosis. Our experience in aortic root reoperation is presented. From January 2000 to March 2019, 26 patients underwent reoperative valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique. The time from the initial operation to reoperation was 69.3 ± 51.6 months. Aortic root reoperation was required for a fragile wall at the previous proximal anastomosis or aortic root dilatation. We aimed to stabilize the aortic root without valve regurgitation. The native aortic cusp was aggressively preserved when nearly normal. Indications included root dilatation (n = 13), pseudoaneurysm of the previous proximal anastomosis (n = 11), and aortic valve regurgitation (n = 4). There was no early postoperative mortality. Follow-up was 49 ± 47 months (range 4-161 months). The 3, 5, and 10-year survival was 88.9% ± 7.4%, 88.9% ± 7.4%, and 77.8% ± 12.2%, respectively. Freedom from recurrence of a greater than moderate degree of aortic valve regurgitation at 3, 5, and 10 years was 86.5% ± 8.9%, 86.5% ± 8.9%, and 86.5% ± 8.9%, respectively. One patient underwent aortic valve replacement for recurrent aortic valve regurgitation 15 months after the valve-sparing reoperation. Midterm outcomes of reoperative valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction using the reimplantation technique and postoperative aortic valve performance were satisfactory.

Ascending Aortoplasty in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Procedures

The risks of ascending aortic dilation and indications for intervention in pediatric patients are unclear. Given the concern for aortic size mismatch with growth, larger ascending aortic diameters have been accepted in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ascending aortic reduction at the time of aortic valve surgery and its effect on recurrent aortic regurgitation. A retrospective 8-year observational review (2010-2018) was conducted in pediatric patients with dilated ascending aorta undergoing aortic valve surgery at a single institution. Forty-seven patients underwent ascending aortoplasty during aortic valve surgery, of which 39 patients with complete data points had preoperative mean ascending aortic Z-scores of 5.35 ± 1.52 reduced to 1.22 ± 1.63 (P < .001) postoperatively. Ascending aortic Z-scores remained similar at 1.37 ± 1.72 at latest follow-up (P= .306). In contrast our matched control group (n= 39) without ascending aortoplasty had preoperative mean ascending aortic Z-scores of 4.15 ± 1.65 reduced to 3.26 ± 2.0 at the midterm follow-up. This reduction was significantly larger in the aortoplasty group, with an average difference in these changes of 3.12 (95% confidence interval, 2.43-3.8; P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression (controlling for aortic valve intervention type and body surface area) showed a 6.84 odds of moderate to severe aortic regurgitation at follow-up in the control group compared with the aortoplasty group (95% confidence interval, 1.43-32.8; P= .016). There were no complications associated with ascending aortoplasty. Ascending aortoplasty is effective in reducing ascending aortic dimensions and recurrent aortic regurgitation in pediatric patients. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to determine continued rate of growth.

Long-term Results of Differentiated Anatomic Reconstruction of Bicuspid Aortic Valves

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair has been used in limited cohorts, but its long-term results in a large population are unknown. To analyze the long-term stability of BAV repair for survival and the factors associated with repair failure and to evaluate whether a differentiated anatomic repair approach may improve repair stability. In this case series, 1024 patients underwent BAV repair for aortic regurgitation or aneurysm between October 1995 and June 2018, with a mean (SD) follow-up time of 56 (49) months and maximum follow-up of 271 months. Systematic modifications in technique based on anatomic principles were introduced in 2009 and applied for the last 727 patients. Data were acquired prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Repair of BAV with or without concomitant aortic replacement, as well as postoperative clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Survival and incidence of reoperation or recurrent aortic regurgitation, as well as factors associated with valve repair failure. Among the 1024 patients in the study (920 male [89.8%]; mean [SD] age, 47 [13] years [range, 15-86 years]), the survival rate at 15 years was 82.1%. The cumulative incidence of reoperation was 30.7% (95% CI, 22.7%-38.7%) at 15 years. Cusp calcification (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.14-2.77; P = .01), asymmetric commissural orientation (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.02-3.72; P = .04), and use of a pericardial patch for cusp repair (subdistribution hazard ratio, 5.25; 95% CI, 3.52-7.82; P < .001) were associated with time to reoperation. At 10 years, the incidence of reoperation was significantly reduced among patients who received the anatomic repair concept compared with those who had undergone surgery in the earlier period (8.8% vs 24.6%; P < .001). This study suggests that survival after BAV repair is excellent and that a large proportion of BAV repairs will remain stable. Repair stability can be markedly improved by an anatomic repair concept. Cusp calcification and the need for cusp repair using a patch remain the factors most strongly associated with valve failure. In those instances, valve replacement should be preferred.

Mid-term Outcomes of the Supported Ross Procedure in Children, Teenagers, and Young Adults

The Ross procedure in children, teenagers, and young adults, especially among those with a bicuspid aortic valve with aortic regurgitation, has been associated with neoaortic root dilatation and recurrence of aortic regurgitation. We have shown that at intermediate follow-up, patients who underwent a supported Ross technique were less likely to have neoaortic root dilatation. This study summarizes our most recent outcomes. This was a retrospective review of 40 consecutive pediatric and young adult patients undergoing a supported Ross procedure from 2005 to 2018. Clinical outcomes were reviewed in addition to echocardiographic measures of neoaortic dimension and neoaortic valve function. The median age at surgery was 16.0 years (range 10 - 35 years). Preoperative diagnosis was aortic regurgitation in 15 (37.5%) and mixed regurgitation/stenosis in 20 (50%). Median follow-up was 3.5 years (1.4-5.6) with 3 patients followed for more than 10 years. There were no deaths. Five patients had a reintervention, but only 1 on the aortic valve. One patient returned to the operating room on postoperative day 1 for revision of the right coronary button. Two patients required biventricular pacemakers for reduced ejection fraction. One patient developed aortic regurgitation and underwent mechanical valve replacement and another required a reintervention on the homograft with a percutaneously placed pulmonary valve replacement. At last follow-up, 39 patients had mild or less aortic regurgitation with median sinus z-score of 1.40 (0.48-2.07). Mid-term follow-up of pediatric and young adult patients undergoing a supported Ross operation for various aortic valve pathologies demonstrate excellent results with minimal neoaortic root dilation and reintervention.

Preoperative Cardiac Computed Tomography Characteristics Associated with Recurrent Aortic Regurgitation after Aortic Valve Re-Implantation.

ObjectiveTo identify the preoperative cardiac computed tomography (CT) factors influencing postoperative recurrent aortic regurgitation (AR) in patients who underwent aortic valve repair with the re-implantation technique (David operation) due to AR.Materials and MethodsA total of 117 patients (age, 49.4 ± 15.6 years; 83 males) who underwent the David operation for AR were included in this retrospective study. Aortic root profiles including the aortic regurgitant orifice area (ARO) and the aortic cusp asymmetry ratio of the areas (ASRarea), which is defined as the maximum/minimum areas among the three cusp areas at the level of the commissures, were measured on preoperative cardiac CT scans. Clinical and CT findings were compared between a group with recurrent AR grade < 3 (no, trivial, or mild AR) and recurrent ≥ 3 + AR. To determine the optimal cut-off values of ASR and ARO, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used. Cox regression analysis was used for the analysis of the factors affecting recurrent 3 + AR.ResultsPostoperatively, recurrent 3 + AR developed in 17 (14.5%) patients and occurred within a median of 268 days (interquartile range: 78–582 days). The cut-off ARO value for discriminating the patients with recurrent 3 + AR was > 24 mm2 (sensitivity, 76.5%; specificity 64.8%), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.72. For ASRarea, the cut-off value was > 1.58 (sensitivity, 76.5%; specificity, 58.0%) and the AUC was 0.64. Multivariable Cox regression showed that ARO > 24 mm2 (hazard ratio = 3.79, p = 0.020) was a potential independent parameter for recurrent 3 + AR. ROC for the linear regression model showed that the AUC for both ARO and ASRarea was 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.64–0.81, p < 0.001).ConclusionARO and ASRarea detected on preoperative cardiac CT would be potentially helpful for identifying AR patients who may benefit from the David operation.

Long-term outcomes and predictors of recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve-sparing and reconstructive cusp surgery: a single centre experience

BackgroundAortic valve sparing surgery (AVS), in combination with aortic cusp repair (ACR), still raises many questions about the increased surgical complexity and applicability for patients with pure aortic valve regurgitation (AR). The aim of this study was to investigate our long-term outcomes and predictors of recurrent AR (> 2+) after AVS and reconstructive cusp surgery.MethodsWe reviewed data of 81 patients who underwent AVS (a reimplantation technique) with concomitant ACR for AR and or dilatation of the aortic root at our institution during the period from April 2004 to October 2016. On preoperative echocardiography, the majority of the patients, 70 (86.4%) presented with severe AR grade (> 3+) and 28 (34.5%) of the patients had the bicuspid phenotype. Time to event analysis (long-term survival, freedom from reoperation, and recurrence of AR > 2+) was performed with the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression risk analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of recurrent AR (> 2+). The mean follow-up was 5.3 ± 3.3 years and 100% complete.ResultsThe in-hospital (30-day) mortality rate after elective surgery was 1.2%. The overall actuarial survival rates were 92.9 ± 3.1% and 90.4 ± 3.9% at five and 10 years, respectively. Actuarial freedom from recurrent AR (> 2+) was 83.7 ± 4.5% within the cohort at five and 10 years. The cumulative freedom from all causes of cardiac reoperation was 94.2 ± 2.8% within the cohort at 10 years. Neither bleeding nor thromboembolic or permanent neurologic events were reported during follow-up. By multivariate analysis, independent predictors of reccurent AR (> 2+) were an effective height lower than 9 mm (p= 0.02) and intraoperative residual mild AR (p= 0.0001).ConclusionsAVS with ACR, combined in a systematic fashion, is a safe and reproducible option with low risk of long-term valve related events and normal life expectancy for patients with pure aortic regurgitation.The competent aortic valve and effective height, not lower than 9 mm intraoperatively, are mandatory to achieve long-lasting AV competency.

Aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty in acute type A aortic dissection.

To investigate the early and mid-term results of aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty in acute type A aortic dissection. From January 2015 to April 2019, a total of 194 patients underwent emergency or urgent operation for acute type A aortic dissection in our hospital. Of these, outcomes in 18 patients who underwent valve-sparing aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age of the 18 patients was 49 ± 14 years. Fourteen patients (78%) were men. Five patients had Marfan syndrome and 2 patients had bicuspid aortic valve. Two patients had coronary malperfusion and 1 patient had cerebral malperfusion. All 18 patients underwent aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty. Cusp repair using central cusp plication was required in 9 patients. Concomitant procedures were hemiarch replacement in 8 patients, total arch replacement in 7 patients, partial arch replacement in 1 patient and coronary artery bypass grafting to the right coronary artery in 3 patients. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5.6% (1 of 18). Postoperative echocardiography showed aortic regurgitation of <1+ in all patients. During follow-up (mean 56 ± 41 months), 1 case of recurrent aortic regurgitation required aortic valve replacement. Aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty may be an appropriate treatment in middle-aged or younger patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection.

Early and long-term results of aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery for bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves

To evaluate early and long-term clinical outcomes following aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery in patients with leaking bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. The study consisted of 92 consecutive adult patients (tricuspid aortic valve group = 63 and bicuspid aortic valve group = 29) who underwent aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery with or without aortic cusp repair for dilatation of the aortic root and/or aortic valve regurgitation at our institution from April 2004 to October 2016. Clinical outcomes were investigated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests between groups. The follow-up was 100% complete with a mean time of 5.3 ± 3.3 years. The 30-day in-hospital mortality was 3.1% in tricuspid aortic valve group and 3.4% in bicuspid aortic valve group patients. The overall survival rates at 10 years did not differ between bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve patient groups (96.6 ± 3.3% vs. 90.3 ± 4.2%, p = 0.3). Freedom from recurrent aortic valve regurgitation (>2+) at 10 years was 90.5 ± 4.1% in tricuspid aortic valve group and 75.7 ± 8.7% in bicuspid aortic valve group (p = 0.06). Freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 10 years was 100% in tricuspid aortic valve group and 83.9 ± 7.4% in bicuspid aortic valve group (p = 0.002). Aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery is a safe and efficient technique, providing acceptable long-term survival with low rates of valve-related complications in both tricuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortic valve patient groups. However, aortic valve reoperation rates at 10 years follow-up were higher in bicuspid aortic valve group patients compared to tricuspid aortic valve group patients.