Recurrent Aortic Insufficiency Research Articles

Aortic Valve Degeneration After Valve-Sparing Root Replacement in Patients with Bicuspid Aortopathy or Connective Tissue Disorder

ObjectiveEvaluate outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) in patients with bicuspid aortopathy (BAV) versus other connective tissue disorder (CTD). MethodsSingle-center cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing VSRR via reimplantation from 2000-2023 with BAV or CTD. Operative outcomes, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and cumulative risk of reoperation and recurrent aortic insufficiency (AI) with the competing risk of death were assessed. ResultsOf 516 VSRR patients, 109 (51.9%) had BAV and 101 (48.1%) had CTD. BAV patients were older (46.9±10.4 vs 38.4±14 years, p<0.001) and more likely male ( 89.0% vs 56.4%, p<0.001) and hypertensive (66.1% vs 28.7%, p<0.001). Preoperative AI was similar (p=0.57) between groups (30.3% mild, 18.3% moderate, 11.1% severe). Most patients had no/trivial immediate postoperative residual AI (96.3% vs 93.1%). Operative mortality was zero; postoperative adverse events were minimal. Mean clinical follow-up was 5.2±4.4 years; ten-year survival was 95.6% vs 95.7% (p=0.70). Echocardiographic follow-up was 3.9±4.1 years; incidence of >2+ AI (9.7% vs 10.1%, p=1.0) was similar between groups, while incidence of moderate or greater aortic stenosis (AS) was higher with BAV (7.5% vs 0%, p=0.02). Reoperation was low in both groups (3.7% vs 5.9%, p=0.65). Competing risk analysis found no difference in reoperation hazard between BAV and CTD groups (hazard ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.07-1.81, p=0.21). ConclusionsBAV and CTD patients have excellent operative outcomes, no mortality, and minimal residual AI after VSRR. While the incidence of recurrent AI was similar, BAV patients are at risk for AS.

Early to mid-term clinical outcomes of aortic valve repair in patients with bicuspid aortic insufficiency

Objective: To examine the early to mid-term clinical outcomes of aortic valve repair in patients with bicuspid aortic insufficiency. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of 124 patients with BAV insufficiency who underwent aortic valve repair from January 2017 to June 2023 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at Fuwai Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. There were 117 males and 7 females with an age of (38.1±12.7) years (range: 14 to 65 years). Depending on whether the aortic sinus was replaced or not, surgical approaches were divided into valve sparing root replacement (reimplantation, remodeling, modified remodeling) and isolated aortic valve repair (annuloplasty, isolated aortic valve leaflet repair). Perioperative and follow-up data were collected. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the curves of survival rate, free recurrence rate of massive aortic valve insufficiency and free re-operation rate, and Log-rank test was used for comparison between groups. Results: Among the surgeries, there were 47 cases of reimplantation, 8 cases of remodeling, 8 cases of modified remodeling, 48 cases of aortic annuloplasty (external annuloplasty in 22 cases, CV-0 annuloplasty in 26 cases), and 13 cases of isolated leaflet repair. Leaflet plication was the most used leaflet repair technique, used in 103 patients. The cardiopulmonary bypass time was (133.7±56.9) minutes (range: 48 to 461 minutes), and aortic cross-clamp time was (103.8±47.8) minutes (range: 25 to 306 minutes), with no surgical mortality. All patients underwent outpatient or telephone follow-up. The cumulative follow-up time was 340.3 person-years and the mean follow-up time was (M (IQR)) 34.0 (25.5) months (range: 3 to 76 months). The 5-year survival rate was 98.4%, the 5-year freedom from significant insufficiency rate was 93.4% and the 5-year freedom from aortic valve reoperation rate was 95.6%. The subgroup analysis revealed a significantly better freedom from the significant insufficiency rate in the aortic valve annular reduction group compared to the non-reduction group (P<0.01). Conclusions: Aortic valve repair in patients with bicuspid aortic insufficiency could obtain steady early to mid-term outcomes. Aortic annuloplasty can reduce the risk of recurrent aortic valve insufficiency in patients undergoing aortic repair.

Twenty-five Years of Root Remodeling for Root Aneurysm and Tricuspid Aortic Valve.

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the long-term results of root remodelling with tricuspid aortic valves and the effects of concomitant cusp repair and annuloplasty. Between 10/1995 and 12/2021, 684 patients with root aneurysm and regurgitant tricuspid valves were treated by root remodelling. Mean age was 56.5(SD: 14) years, 538(77.6%) were male. Relevant aortic regurgitation was present in 68.3%. Concomitant procedures were performed in 374 patients. The long-term results were analyzed. Mean follow-up of 7.2(SD: 5.3) years (median 6.6 years); it was 95% complete (4934.4 patient-years). Cusps prolapse was repaired in 83%, an annuloplasty was added in 353 instances (51.6%). Hospital mortality was 2.3%, survival was 81.7% (SD: 1.2) and 55.7 (SD: 5.8) at 10 and 20 years; age and measurement of effective height were independent predictors for death.Freedom from AI II was 90.5 (SD : 1.9) at 10 years and 76.7(SD : 4.5) at 20 years. Cusp repair of all cusps showed a lower freedom from recurrent AI≥II at 10 years(p < 0.001). Suture annuloplasty showed a lower freedom from recurrent AI II at 10 years (p = 0.07).Freedom from reoperation was 95.5(SD : 1.1) and 92.8(SD: 2.8) at 10 and 20 years. The addition of an annuloplasty showed no difference(p = 0.236). Cusp repair had no effect on valve durability(p = 0.390). Root remodelling leads to good long-term stability. The addition of cusp repair improves the valve stability over time. The addition of suture annuloplasty improve early valve competency; it showed no effect on freedom from reoperation up to 10 years.

Bicuspid valve repair outcomes are improved with reduction and stabilization of sinotubular junction and annulus with external annuloplasty

ObjectiveWe investigated long-term outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair, with external annuloplasty, according to aorta phenotype. MethodsBetween 2003 and 2020, all patients with BAV operated on for aortic insufficiency (AI) and/or aneurysm were included. Repairs included isolated AI repair with subvalvular with or without sinotubular junction (STJ) (single or double) annuloplasty, supracoronary aorta replacement (with or without hemiroot remodeling), and root remodeling with external subvalvular ring annuloplasty. ResultsAmong 343 patients operated, reparability rate was 81.3% (n = 279; age 46 ± 13.3 years). At 10 years (median follow-up: 3.42 years; interquartile range, 1.1, 5.8), survival was 93.9% (n = 8 deaths, similar to general population), cumulative incidence of reoperation was 6.2% (n = 10), AI grade >2 was 5.8% (n = 9), and grade >1 was 23.0% (n = 30). BAV repair stabilizing both the annulus and STJ with annuloplasty, compared with nonstabilized STJ repair (single annuloplasty), had lower incidence of reoperation (2.6% vs 22.5%, P = .0018) and AI grade >2 (1.2% vs 23.6%, P < .001) at 9 years. Initial commissural angle <160° was not a risk factor for reoperation, compared with angle ≥160° if symmetrical repair was achieved (2.7% and 4.1%, respectively, at 6 years, P = .85). Multivariable model showed that absence of STJ stabilization (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-20, P = .001) increased recurrent AI, but not initial commissural angle <160° (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-2.63, P = .98). Commissures adjusted symmetrically led to lower transvalvular gradient, compared with nonsymmetrical repair (8.7 mm Hg vs 10.2 mm Hg, P = .029). ConclusionsBAV repair, tailored to aorta phenotype, is associated with excellent durable outcomes if both annulus and STJ are reduced and stabilized with external ring annuloplasty. Commissural angle <160° is not associated with reoperation if symmetrical repair is achieved.

Aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients

ObjectiveExisting replacement options for the aortic valve have significant drawbacks, especially in children. A geometric annuloplasty ring can help to achieve consistently successful aortic valve repair, but only limited experience with use of this device has been reported in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients. MethodsAll pediatric and adult congenital patients at our institution who underwent aortic valve repair with placement of a geometric annuloplasty ring were reviewed. The study period spanned from July 2018 to April 2022. Hemodynamic outcomes were evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography. ResultsThe study included 36 subjects. The median age was 17.4 years (range, 8-30 years). Twenty-one subjects were younger than age 18 years. The most common primary diagnoses were neoaortic valve insufficiency or neoaortic root dilation, and congenital aortic stenosis with bicuspid or functionally unicuspid aortic valve. Of the 34 subjects with procedural success, 31 (91%) had use of additional valve repair techniques and 26 (76%) had an additional concomitant procedure performed. Operative mortality was 0% (0/33), and major complication rate was 6% (2/33). The median follow-up time was 1.9 years (maximum, 3.8 years). The mean grade of aortic insufficiency was signific antly reduced after repair, with no change in mean gradients. Freedom from reoperation over the follow-up period was 97% (33/34), and freedom from ≥3+ recurrent aortic insufficiency was 94% (32/34). ConclusionsA geometric annuloplasty ring can be used to help achieve consistently successful aortic valve repair with excellent perioperative and follow-up outcomes, even in pediatric and complex congenital heart disease patients.

Aortic valve fenestration: respect it or fix it?

We investigated whether aortic valve fenestrations (respected or fixed) represent a factor associated with recurrent aortic insufficiency or reoperation after repair. Between 2003 and 2019, patients who underwent aortic valve repair were included. Aortic insufficiency phenotypes were root aneurysm (repair: root remodelling + annuloplasty), ascending aorta aneurysm (repair: tubular aortic replacement + annuloplasty) and isolated regurgitation (repair: single/double annuloplasty). Fenestrations were either respected or fixed according to their features. A total of 618 patients (out of 798 operated on; 77.4%) had their valve repaired, with 167 cases of fenestrations (128 were respected, 39 fixed-32 with a patch, 6 with running suture and 1 with both). After conducting propensity score matching between no-fenestration (n = 167) and fenestration groups (n = 167), respectively, we noted the following: survival [90.3% (n = 7 deaths) vs 95.8% (n = 4)], cumulative incidence of reoperation [6.7% (n = 7) vs 5.2% (n = 4)], aortic insufficiency grade ≥ 3 [6.4% (n = 6) vs 4.4% (n = 4)] and grade ≥ 2 [28.9% (n = 28) vs 37.1% (n = 35)] were similar at 9 years [P = 0.94; median follow-up: 2.2, interquartile range: (0.8, 5.8)], whether fenestration was respected (P = 0.55) or fixed (P = 0.6, at 6 years). Standardization of the surgical approach (consisting of double annuloplasty in isolated regurgitation phenotype and expansible subvalvular annuloplasty with effective height assessment with remodelling repair for root aneurysm phenotype) reduced the risk of reoperation (era before standardization: hazard ratio: 5.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-15.7, P = 0.002). Fenestration, respected or fixed, is not a factor associated with reoperation or recurrence of significant aortic insufficiency after valve repair if the surgical approach is standardized.

Aortic Valve Repair Using HAART 300 Geometric Annuloplasty Ring: A Review and Echocardiographic Case Series

Aortic valve repair (AVr) aims to preserve the native aortic leaflets and restore normal valve function. In doing so, AVr is a more technically challenging approach than traditional aortic valve replacement. Some of the complexity of repair techniques can be attributed to the unique structure of the functional aortic annulus (FAA), which, unlike the well-defined mitral annulus, is comprised of virtual and functional components. Though stabilizing the ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ), a component of the FAA, is considered beneficial for patients with chronic aortic insufficiency (AI), the ideal AVr technique remains a subject of much debate. The existing AVr techniques do not completely stabilize the VAJ which may increase susceptibility to recurrent AI due to VAJ dilation. An emerging new technique showing promise for the treatment of both isolated and complex AI is AVr using HAART 300TM geometric annuloplasty ring (GAR). The GAR is implanted below the valve leaflets in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), providing stability and creating a neo-annulus. As with other AVr subtypes, this procedure has a learning curve. There are unique surgical and echocardiographic aspects of AVr with GAR, including the appearance of the LVOT, the aortic valve leaflets, and their motion which cardiac anesthesiologists and echocardiographers must be familiar with. In this work, using an eight-patient echocardiographic case series, we provide an overview of this novel AVr technique, including some unique aspects of device sizing, patient selection, expected post-repair echocardiographic features, and a review of outcomes data.

Long-term durability of a reimplantationvalve-sparing aortic root replacement can be expected in both Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of a valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique for annuloaortic ectasia in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and in those with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS). We reviewed 103 patients with MSF with mutations in the fibrillin-1 gene and 28 patients with LDS with mutations in the transforming growth factor-beta receptor and 2, SMAD3 and transforming growth factor beta-2 from 1988 to 2020. Forty-four (42.7%) patients with MFS [26 men, 31 (7.6) years] and 10 (35.7%) patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) [7 men, 22 (standard deviation: 8.6) years] who had no aortic dissection and underwent valve-sparing root replacement were included. The preoperative sinus diameter [46 (45-50.5) mm in those with MFS vs 48 (47-50) mm in those with LDS, p = 0.420] and the percentage of aortic insufficiency > grade 2+ [31.8% (10/44) in patients with MFS vs 10.0% (1/10) in those with LDS, p = 0.667] revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. The cumulative incidences of aortic insufficiency greater than grade 1 (p = 0.588) and aortic valve reoperation (p = 0.310) were comparable between the 2 groups. Patients with LDS had a higher tendency towards aortic dissection after the initial operation (p = 0.061) and a significantly higher cumulative incidence of aortic reoperation (p = 0.003) versus those with MFS. Patients with MFS and those with LDS showed similar cumulative incidences of recurrent aortic valve insufficiency and aortic valve reoperation. Those with LDS revealed a higher cumulative incidence of aortic reoperation and a greater tendency towards aortic dissection after the initial operation compared with those with MFS.

Comparison of the Bentall procedure versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement

Bentall and valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) procedures are established treatments for aortic root disease. We present a single-center retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of bioprosthetic Bentall (BB), mechanical Bentall (MB), and VSRR patients from November 2007 to October 2016. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the composite endpoint of freedom from recurrent aortic insufficiency, reoperation, or death. Of the 170 patients, BB was performed in 36 patients, MB in 63 patients, and VSRR in 71 patients. For BB, MB, and VSRR, the mean age was 63.8, 45.5, and 49.2 years (P < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, significantly more patients in the MB group (n = 32, 50.8%, P < 0.001) than in the BB and VSRR groups had prior cardiac surgeries. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time were significantly longer in the VSRR group (P = 0.04 and 0.0005, respectively). Despite the complexity of the procedure, VSRR patients had higher combined freedom from death and reoperation than patients in the BB or MB groups. Elective Bentall root replacement is an excellent option for patients with root disease. Patients undergoing Bentall tend to have more severe or emergent cases, making them unlikely candidates for VSRR. VSRR in experienced centers carries equivalent morbidity and mortality and improved survival.

Recurrent aortic insufficiency after emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection with aortic root preservation

ObjectivePatients with acute type A aortic dissection demonstrate a wide range of aortic insufficiency. Outcomes after valve resuspension and root repair are not well studied in the long term. We evaluated the long-term effects of preoperative aortic insufficiency in patients undergoing emergency root-preserving surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. MethodsFrom 2002 to 2017, 558 of 776 patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent native aortic valve resuspension and root reconstruction. Patients were stratified into 4 groups by preoperative aortic insufficiency grade (n = 539): aortic insufficiency less than 2+ (n = 348), aortic insufficiency = 2+ (n = 72), aortic insufficiency = 3+ (n = 49), and aortic insufficiency = 4+ (n = 70). Multivariable ordinal longitudinal mixed effects and multi-state transition models were used to assess risk factors for recurrent aortic insufficiency. ResultsThe prevalence of cardiogenic shock in patients presenting with preoperative aortic insufficiency less than 2+, 2+, 3+, and 4+ was 53 of 348 (15.2%), 12 of 72 (16.7%), 10 of 49 (20.4%), and 24 of 70 (34.3%), respectively (P = .002). Postoperatively, 94.0% of patients had aortic insufficiency 1+ or less at discharge. Operative mortality was 34 of 348 (9.8%), 10 of 72 (13.9%), 6 of 49 (12.2%), and 12 of 70 (17.1%) (P = .303). In an ordinal mixed effects model, preoperative aortic insufficiency was associated with more severe postoperative aortic insufficiency. The multi-state transition model demonstrated that severe aortic insufficiency was associated with progression from no to mild aortic insufficiency (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-3.38), and progression from mild to moderate aortic insufficiency (hazard ratio, 5.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-17.30). ConclusionsPreoperative aortic insufficiency is an important predictor of recurrent aortic insufficiency in patients undergoing valve resuspension with root reconstruction for emergency acute type A aortic dissection repair. Increased echocardiographic surveillance for recurrent aortic insufficiency may be warranted in this cohort.

Aortic Valve Repair Versus Replacement Associated With Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Aortic valve (AV) repair (AVr) using a central coaptation stitch or bioprosthetic AV replacement (AVR) are most commonly performed at the time of durable left ventricular assist device implant to address AV insufficiency (AI). Prospective data collection on 46 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implant from 2007 through 2018 who received concomitant AVr (n=40) or AVR (n= 6) was retrospectively analyzed to assess freedom from recurrent aortic insufficiency. Paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare echocardiographic findings. Mantel-Cox statistics were used to analyze survival. For AVr, central coaptation led to a mean decrease in AI severity by 2.1 ± 1.0 grades (P < .001). Three patients (7.5%) had recurrence of at least moderate AI by 3 years. In comparison, all patients in the AVR group had mild or less AI on subsequent follow-up. Success of AVr in downgrading AI severity was associated with a smaller aortic root diameter (P= .011) and sinotubular junction diameter (P= .003). An aortic root diameter greater than 3.5 cm was predictive of less improvement in AI severity compared with 3.5 cm or less (1.83 ± 1.03 versus 2.47 ± 0.80 grades of improvement; P= .038). Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was 32 minutes longer and duration of aortic cross-clamp was 38 minutes longer for AVR versus AVr cohorts. No difference in 30-day (P= .418) or overall survival (P= .572) between the AVr and AVR groups was seen. Aortic valve repair for addressing AI has a recurrence rate of 7.5% at 3 years. Success in downgrading AI is more likely with a smaller aortic root. No difference in survival was observed between AVr and AVR.

Discussion

Dr Michael P. Fischbein (Stanford, Calif). Excellent presentation; I enjoyed it. I have a few questions. I think that Schäfers taught all of us that in addition to commissural orientation, other factors are important for recurrent aortic insufficiency, such as effective height and making sure that your coaptation height is above the annular plane. Did you look at these other parameters and confirm that they were not different between the 2 groups?

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Related Thrombosis in a Patient with a Left Ventricular Assist Device

Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported as treatment for LVAD related aortic insufficiency (AI). However, the risks of this procedure with unique LVAD physiology are not known. This case describes the diagnostic challenges and catastrophic consequences of TAVR related thrombosis in a continuous flow LVAD patient. Case Report A 68 year old male with a history of TAVR, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and VT underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge to decision. The post-op course was complicated by recurrent heart failure and severe LVAD related AI. He underwent valve-in-valve TAVR for LVAD related AI and initial aortography revealed unobstructed flow into the coronary arteries. He developed incessant VT and shock post-operatively. After failure of medical and ablative therapies, he was transferred to our institution for urgent transplant evaluation. He was listed as status 1 for heart transplantation according to current guidelines for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia. Imaging studies did not raise suspicion for valve related complication. Admission TTE demonstrated moderate RV dysfunction and the TAVR was not well visualized, but it was well seated without regurgitation. Perioperative TEE had limited TAVR evaluation (Figure 1A-B) but there was normal flow across the inflow and outflow cannulas of the LVAD. There was no echo derived aortic valve gradients to cause clinical suspicion for TAVR thrombosis with ischemic complications, so 4D CTA was not obtained. At the time of heart transplantation, the patient was found to have a large aortic root thrombus with extension into the left main coronary artery and a large thrombus extending from the undersurface of the valve causing complete obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract (Figure 2A-B). Summary We highlight a case of valve-in-valve TAVR related thrombosis as an unexpected cause of VT in LVAD supported patient. Valve thrombosis was not suspected with the available imaging and likely caused the patient's clinical deterioration. The risk of TAVR related complications may be increased in the setting of continuous flow LVAD physiology due to unique flow dynamics and the presence of intermittent or persistent aortic valve closure.

Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes After Aortic Valve Repair Surgery.

To assess early and late clinical outcomes in patients who underwent aortic valve repair surgery for aortic valve insufficiency, and to investigate predictors for recurrence. Of 151 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve repair surgery for varying degrees of aortic insufficiency (AI) in our department between 2004 and 2018, 60 (40%) underwent aortic root replacement, 71 (47%) aortic cusp plication, 31 (20%) subcommissural annuloplasty, 29 (19%) circular annuloplasty, and 28 (18%) autologous pericardial patch augmentation. One patient died in the hospital (0.7%). Mean clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 62±43 months (range 1 to 159) and 50 ± 40 months (range 1 to 158), respectively. The overall survival rate was 99.3% at 1 year and 98% at 5 years of follow-up. Seventeen patients (11.3%) had recurrent severe AI, and all of them underwent reoperation with a mean duration to reoperation of 35 ± 39 months. Risk factors for the development of recurrent significant AI (≥3) or reoperation, by univariable analysis, were unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve (AV) (P = 0.018), the use of subcommissural annuloplasty (P = 0.010), the need for cusp repair (P = 0.001), and the use of pericardial patch augmentation (P < 0.001). By multivariable analysis only the use of pericardial patch augmentation emerged as a significant independent predictor for the development of recurrent significant AI (≥3) or reoperation (P = 0.020). AV repair can be performed with low morbidity and mortality, with good early and late clinical outcomes. However, in our experience there was a significant rate of recurrent AI especially in patients who underwent cusp augmentation using glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch.

Predictors of Aortic Valve Repair Failure.

Aortic valve repair is the preferred approach for the treatment of severe aortic insufficiency (AI), as it allows patients to keep their native aortic valve, thus substantially reducing the risk of prosthesis-related complications. Several studies have documented excellent long-term outcomes of aortic valve repair. The major complication of this operation is AI recurrence, with ensuingneed for reoperation. The surgical experience accumulated over the last two decades has allowed for better understanding of the mechanisms of recurrent AI after aortic valve repair. Herein, we review the current state of knowledge on predictors of aortic valve repair failure. These include unaddressed annular dilation, residual cusp prolapse or retraction, commissural orientation, and use of patch material. This enhanced understanding has led to the development of increasingly refined techniques and improved patient outcomes. Continued follow-up and detailed data collection at the time of surgery, together with three-dimensional echo imaging, will allow further improvements in aortic valve repair.

VD08 COMMISSURAL SYMMETRIC REPOSITIONING IN BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE SPARING SURGERY

Abstract Particularity of the Video: Bicuspid aortic valve, the most common congenital cardiac defect, is often associated to ascending aorta and root dilation. Since commissural orientation &lt;160° is one of the principal risk factors for recurrent aortic insufficiency, our systematic approach consists of reimplantation with 180°-180° geometric configuration associated to aortic leaflets repair. Brief Description: The valve was bicuspid due to right-left coronary cusps fusion with a fibrotic raphe. Raphe and leaflets free margin shaving was performed within the native aortic root intact to improve cusp mobility and restore a normal motion. Reimplantation procedure was performed in the conventional fashion except for the peculiarity that the valve resuspension started with fixation of the two commissures in a 180°-180° symmetric configuration within the neo-root (Valsalva graft n.28) to the new predetermined sinotubular junction. Before completion of the surgery, the valve was re-assessed to correct any residual prolapse: both leaflets needed plicature.

Predictors of Recurrent Aortic Insufficiency in Type I Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair

Annular stabilization techniques in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair include valve-sparing root reimplantation (VSRR), external subannular aortic ring (ESAR), and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA). Unlike VSRR that offers neoroot creation, ESAR and SCA offer annular reduction only. We compared long-term functional outcomes to understand BAV repair durability. From 2004 to 2017, 137 patients underwent Sievers type I BAV repair (VSRR, n= 54; ESAR, n= 22; SCA, n= 51). Prospectively maintained BAV repair database was queried for clinical and functional outcomes. Data were analyzed by logistic regression, threshold regression, multistate survival, and transition models for BAV repair durability. VSRR patients had larger preoperative sinus dimensions (p < 0.001), but mean preoperative annulus size was similar for VSRR, ESAR, and SCA (29.3 ± 3.7 mm, 29.8 ± 3.8 mm, and 29.7 ± 3.8mm, respectively; p= 0.807). Degree of annular reduction (p= 0.280) was comparable between the groups. Intraoperative postrepair freedom from aortic insufficiency (AI) 1+ or greater was 100% across the entire cohort. By logistic regression, important predictors of recurrent AI (1+ and ≥2+) were preoperative annulus of 30 mm or more for SCA. Threshold regression confirmed annulus of 30 mm or more as risk factor for recurrent AI of 1+ or greater for SCA. Risk to relapse from no AI to AI 1+ was equal between the groups; however, once AI 1+ was reached, there was a 2.5-fold increased risk for patients with annulus of 30 mm or more who underwent SCA to progress to recurrent AI of 2+ or greater. VSRR is associated with improved longitudinal BAV durability compared with SCA. Preoperative annulus diameter of 30 mm or more is associated with increased recurrent AI, especially for SCA patients. For annular indications, ESAR might offer comparable functional outcomes with VSRR; however, further follow-up is critical.

Aortic symmetry index: Initial validation of a novel preoperative predictor of recurrent aortic insufficiency after valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction

Aortic symmetry index: Initial validation of a novel preoperative predictor of recurrent aortic insufficiency after valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction

Pericardial Patch Augmentation Is Associated With a Higher Risk of Recurrent Aortic Insufficiency

This study assessed early and late clinical outcomes in patients who underwent aortic valve repair or an aortic valve-sparing operation and investigated predictors for failure. Of 227 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve repair or a valve-sparing operation in our department between 2004 and 2016, 81 (36%) underwent aortic root replacement with or without cusp repair, 97 (42%) ascending aorta replacement with or without cusp repair, and 49 (22%) isolated aortic valve repair. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was complete. One patient (0.4%) died in-hospital. Mean clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 69 ± 40 months (range, 1 to 147 months) and 53 ± 40 months (range, 1 to 147 months), respectively. Fifteen patients (6.6%) died during follow-up, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 94.4%. Recurrent significant (≥3) aortic insufficiency developed in 20 patients (8.8%), 17 of whom underwent reoperation, with a 5-year freedom from reoperation rate of 88%. Predictors for recurrent significant aortic insufficiency or reoperation were greater preoperative aortic insufficiency (grade III to IV vs I to II; relative risk [RR], 1.97; p= 0.023), cusp repair (RR, 2.92; p= 0.001), higher European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (RR, 1.16; p= 0.006), and valve repair with pericardial patch augmentation (RR, 2.34; p=0.032). Aortic valve repair and valve-sparing operations can be performed with good early and late clinical outcomes. In our experience, however, the rate of recurrent aortic insufficiency was significant, especially in patients who underwent cusp augmentation with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch.

Valve preserving surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valve

Bicuspid aortic valve can be associated with clinically important aortic regurgitation and dilatation of ascending aorta. Aortic valve repair seems to be optimal therapeutic option how to avoid valve-related and anticoagulation-related complications. We have analyzed midterm outcomes of patients after bicuspid aortic valve repair. MethodsBetween January 2008 and December 2015, 91 patients (mean age 40.9±12.2) with bicuspid aortic valve (type 0 or 1) underwent valve-sparing surgery for aortic valve insufficiency or aortic aneurysm. Urgent procedures and patients of age more than 65 were not included. The cohort of patients was retrospectively divided into two groups. Forty-nine patients underwent aortic valve-sparing procedure with root replacement (group 1). Forty-two patients underwent aortic valve repair without root replacement (group 2). The mean length of follow-up was 57.5 months. ResultsThere was no death in connection with aortic valve repair during follow up. Three patients from group 2 required in-hospital reoperation for early repair failure. Another seven patients (4 from group 1 and 3 from group 2) were reoperated for recurrent aortic insufficiency during follow-up period. Freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 5 years was 90% in group 1 and 87% in group 2. Freedom from recurrent aortic insufficiency (>2°) at 5 years was 85% in group 1 and 78% in group 2. ConclusionBicuspid aortic valve repair is a safe procedure, which can be performed with acceptable midterm results. Risk of repair failure depends on preoperative valve morphology and choice of repair technique. Repair technique needs to be tailored to the specific anatomy of the valve.