Recurrence Of Macular Edema Research Articles

Safety and Efficiency of Anti-VEGF with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Non-Ischemic Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Prospective, Case-controlled, Cohort Study.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF combined with dexamethasone implant for the retinal vein occlusion patients with macular edema. In this prospective, case-controlled, cohort clinical trial (Register ID: ChiCTR2400080048), patients with non-ischemic retinal vein occlusion were enrolled from the Sanmenxia Central Hospital from August 2020 to April 2023. The patients were randomized into two groups. All the patients received ranibizumab intravitreal injection in the first 3 consecutive months. For the ranibizumab group, anti-VEGF injections were as needed thereafter in case of recurrence of macular edema; For the combination group, the patients received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection at 15 days after the first ranibizumab injection. The primary outcome measurements were improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduction in central macular thickness (CMT). The secondary outcomes were recurrence of macular edema, number of intravitreal injections, and injection interval. Safety profiles were also recorded. A total of 124 patients were included, of which 73 patients completed all follow-ups. Both the ranibizumab monotherapy and the combination therapy significantly improved BCVA at all time points, compared to the baseline. The combined group achieved more BCVA improvement in 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, compared to the ranibizumab alone group. Compared to the baseline, both groups achieved significant reductions in CMT at all follow-ups. However, the combination group showed more CMT reduction at 1 week post injection, compared to the ranibizumab group. The combination group had a significantly longer injection interval, lower injection time, and recurrence of macular edema. Ocular hypertension was the most common adverse events. Lastly, intraocular pressure was all well controlled by 1-3 glaucoma medications without surgical intervention. The combination therapy could significantly improve the BCVA and reduce the CMT with a good safety profile.

Longitudinal changes in each retinal layer thickness in patients with non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion

BackgroundTo identify longitudinal changes in each retinal layer thickness in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) patients with resolved macular edema (ME).MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, CRVO patients without a recurrence of ME for more than 3 years and normal controls were enrolled. Each retinal layer thickness of the parafoveal area, including ganglion cell complex (GCC), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptor layer (PRL), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) was measured. After the resolution of ME, three more examinations with a 1-year interval were analyzed.ResultsA total of 98 eyes were enrolled, 50 eyes for the control group and 48 eyes for the CRVO group. The baseline GCC thickness was 114.2 ± 15.6 μm and 104.2 ± 25.4 μm in the control and CRVO groups, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.022). The thicknesses of other layers including INL, OPL, ONL, PRL, and RPE were not significantly different at baseline. The reduction rate of GCC, INL, OPL, and ONL was − 3.92, − 1.33, − 0.91, and − 2.31 μm/year in the CRVO group, whereas no significant reductions were observed in the control group. Best-corrected visual acuity was significantly associated with changes in the GCC, OPL, and ONL in the CRVO group.ConclusionsIn patients with CRVO, even in the absence of recurrent ME, retinal damage progresses over time, evidenced by thinning of the inner retina and outer retina including OPL and ONL. These changes may be associated with alterations in visual function.

Combination Therapy with Anti-VEGF and Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose To compare the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab alone or ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Study design A single center, case-controlled, prospective cohort study (Clinical Trail Registration Number: ChiCTR2400080048). Methods A total of 44 patients were enrolled and randomized into the ranibizumab group (n = 23) and the combination group (ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone intravitreal implant) (n = 21). All patients received ranibizumab intravitreal injections in the first three months as the initial treatment. For the ranibizumab group, patients might receive repeat injections in case of the recurrence of macular edema; For the combination group, patients received an intravitreal injection of dexamethasone implant after the first injection of ranibizumab at the day 15. The main outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduction of central macular thickness. The secondary outcome were the numbers of recurrence, the average injection interval, and the numbers of injection. Adverse events were also recorded. Results The BCVAs in both groups were significantly improved compared with the baselines (all p < 0.001), but more increment in BCVA was noticed at the 3-month in the combination group (p = 0.022). Both groups showed a reduction of central macular thickness at all time points (p < 0.05). However, the combination group did not exhibit higher central macular thickness-reducing effects than the ranibizumab group (p > 0.05). Compared with the combination group, the ranibizumab group suffered a higher number of recurrences of macular edema (p < 0.001), a lower interval of injection (p = 0.050), and a higher number of injection (p < 0.011). The incidence of adverse events was not significant between the two groups (p = 0.944). Conclusions Ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone injection sustainably improved the BCVA of retinal vein occlusion patients with a good safety profile.

Multimodal deep transfer learning to predict retinal vein occlusion macular edema recurrence after anti-VEGF therapy

PurposeTo develop a multimodal deep transfer learning (DTL) fusion model using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images to predict the recurrence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and macular edema (ME) after three consecutive anti-VEGF therapies. MethodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study consisted of 2800 B-scan OCTA macular images collected from 140 patients with RVO-ME. The central macular thickness (CMT) > 250 μm was used as a criterion for recurrence in the three-month follow-up after three injections of anti-VEGF therapy. The qualified OCTA image preprocessing and the lesion area segmentation were performed by senior ophthalmologists. We developed and validated the clinical, DTL, and multimodal fusion models based on clinical and extracted OCTA imaging features. The performance of the models and experts predictions were evaluated using several performance metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. ResultsThe DTL models exhibited higher prediction efficacy than the clinical models and experts’ predictions. Among the DTL models, the Vgg19 performed better than that of the other models, with an AUC of 0.968 (95 % CI, 0.943–0.994), accuracy of 0.913, sensitivity of 0.922, and specificity of 0.902 in the validation cohort. Moreover, the fusion Vgg19 model showed the highest prediction efficacy among all the models, with an AUC of 0.972 (95 % CI, 0.946–0.997), accuracy of 0.935, sensitivity of 0.935, and specificity of 0.934 in the validation cohort. ConclusionsMultimodal fusion DTL models showed robust performance in predicting RVO-ME recurrence and may be applied to assist clinicians in determining patients’ follow-up time after anti-VEGF therapy.

Real-World Evidence of the Long-Term Effectiveness of 0.2 μg/Day Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Persistent and Recurrent Diabetic Macular Edema - A Single Center Study.

To report the long-term functional, anatomical and safety outcomes of 0.2 μg/day fluocinolone acetonide 0.19mg in patients with persistent or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME). Retrospective, observational, single-center study of patients with recurrent or persistent DME. All patients received 0.2 μg/day of fluocinolone acetonide 0.19mg, and data were collected at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 after implantation. Outcomes measured included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and safety outcomes. A total of 28 eyes from 28 patients were included. The mean age was 66.5 years (95% CI 62.8-70.2) with a mean duration of DME of 8.8 years (95% CI 7.7-10.0). Only two eyes were phakic. Mean follow-up was 25.4 months (95% CI 21.2-29.6). Mean BCVA at baseline was 48.6 ETDRS letters (95% CI 41.3-55.8) and improved as early as month 1 of follow-up with a mean gain in BCVA of 7.8 (95% CI 4.3-11.3) ETDRS letters (p<0.001). Statistically significant improvements in BCVA were also observed at months 6, 12 and 24. At baseline, patients had a mean CMT of 530.5µm (95% CI 463.0-598.0), and a decrease in CMT was observed, starting at the first month of follow-up (mean CMT reduction of -170.5µm, 95% CI -223.8- -117.1; p<0.001). Statistically significant decreases in CMT were also observed at months 6, 12, 24, and 36, with the maximum decrease observed at month 12 (p<0.001). Mean IOP at baseline was 16.4mmHg (95% CI 15.3-17.5) and nine eyes (32.1%) had an IOP ≥21mmHg during follow-up. Our results support the effectiveness and safety profile of fluocinolone acetonide. Although additional long-term real-world evidence is required, fluocinolone acetonide may represent a safe strategy for daily, low-dose, sustained and localized release to the posterior segment of the eye, providing both functional and anatomical benefits in DME.

Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa Secondary to TOPORS Mutations: A Report of a Novel Mutation and Clinical Findings.

Purpose: Mutations in Topoisomerase I-binding RS protein (TOPORS) have been previously documented and have been described to result in pathological autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP). In our study, we describe the various genotypes and clinical/phenotypic manifestations of TOPORS-related mutations of our unique patient population in Rural Appalachia. Methods: The medical records of 416 patients with inherited retinal disease at the West Virginia University Eye Institute who had undergone genetic testing between the years of 2015-2022 were reviewed. Patients found to have pathologic RP and mutations related to TOPORS were then analyzed. Results: In total, 7 patients (ages 12-70) were identified amongst three unique families. All patients were female in our study. The average follow-up period was 7.7 years. A mother (70 yr) and daughter (51 yr) had a novel heterozygous nonsense point mutation in TOPORS c.2431C > T, p.Gln811X (Exon 3) that led to premature termination of the desired protein resulting in early onset vision loss, cataract formation, and visual field restriction. The mother developed a full-thickness macular hole which was successfully repaired. Five other patients were found to have previously described TOPORS mutations. Visual field loss was progressive with age in both cohorts. Conclusions: Seven patients at our institution were identified to have mutations in TOPORS resulting in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Two patients were found to have novel truncating mutations in the TOPORS gene resulting in profound night blindness and visual field loss, recurrent macular edema, and in one individual, epiretinal membrane formation leading to a macular hole which was able to be successfully repaired.

Role of optical coherence tomography angiography in the evaluation of peripheral ischemia in retinal vein occlusion.

In the last decade, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has become part of the clinical management of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), proving in itself a useful technique for both the prediction of visual acuity (VA) outcomes and the risk of complications. In fact, OCTA has been proven a valid imaging technique in detailed assessment of foveal and parafoveal microvascular status in both acute and chronic RVO. Quantitative OCTA data have shown a significant correlation not only with final VA but also with the extension of peripheral ischemia, which represents a major risk factor for macular edema recurrence and neovascularization onset. Finally, wide-field OCTA represents a promising noninvasive technique for the assessment of peripheral ischemia. The aim of this review is to report the main literature findings about microvascular changes and clinical applications of OCTA in the context of RVO-induced peripheral ischemia.

Recurrence of macular edema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion: a proteomic study

BackgroundBranch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common retinal vascular disease leading to severe vision loss and blindness. This study aimed to investigate and reveal the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying macular edema (ME) recurrence in patients with BRVO through a proteomic approach.MethodsWe detected proteins in the aqueous humor of 14 untreated, four refractory, and four post-operative patients with BRVO-ME and 12 age-matched cataract controls using four-dimensional label-free proteomic and bioinformatics analyses.ResultsIn total, 84 proteins exhibited significant differential expression between the BRVO and control samples (fold change [FC] ≥ 1.2 and adjusted p-value < 0.05). Compared to the control group, 43 and 41 proteins were upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in the BRVO group. These proteins were involved in cell adhesion, visual perception, retina homeostasis, and platelet activation. Several significantly enriched signaling pathways included complement and coagulation cascades and platelet activation. In the protein–protein interaction networks generated using the search tool for retrieval of interacting genes (STRING), the fibrinogen alpha chain and fibrinogen beta chain constituted a tightly connected cluster. Many common protein expression trends, such as the fibrinogen alpha chain and fibrinogen beta chain, were observed in both the recurrent and refractory groups. Differentially expressed proteins in the two groups were involved in complement activation, acute-phase response, platelet activation, and platelet aggregation. Important signaling pathways include the complement and coagulation cascades, and platelet activation. Protein–protein interaction analysis suggested that the fibrinogen alpha chain and fibrinogen beta chain constituted a tightly connected cluster. The expression of some differentially expressed proteins shared by the BRVO and the recurrent and refractory groups was reversed in the post-operative group.ConclusionsOur study is the first to analyze the proteomics of recurrent, refractory, and post-operative groups treated for BRVO-ME, and may potentially provide novel therapeutic interventions for the recurrence of ME.

OCT Biomarkers Predicting Recurrence of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose: We evaluated factors predicting the recurrence of macular edema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Methods: This study enrolled 55 patients diagnosed with branch retinal vein occlusion who presented to the outpatient clinic between March 2022 and March 2023. A retrospective analysis categorized patients into non-recurrence and recurrence groups. Data on visual acuity, spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure, number of injections, and follow-up duration were collected from medical records. OCT images were obtained before and 6 months after intravitreal injection to measure and analyze central retinal thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness, and disorganization of retinal inner layers.Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the central retinal thickness change before and after treatment between the groups. Although no significant differences were observed in visual acuity between the two groups before treatment, significant improvement in visual acuity was observed in the non-recurrence group after 6 months of treatment. The non-recurrence group was younger compared to the recurrence group; moreover, the intraocular pressure in non-recurrence patients decreased significantly during the 6-month treatment period. In addition, a decrease in subfoveal choroidal thickness before and after treatment, the difference in subfoveal choroidal thickness between the affected eye and the fellow eye before treatment, and the reduction in disorganization of retinal inner layers before and after treatment were associated with a favorable prognosis without recurrence.Conclusions: Changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness before and after treatment, variations in subfoveal choroidal thickness between the affected and fellow eyes before treatment, and the degree of disorganization of retinal inner layers exhibited significant associations with the recurrence of macular edema. This is significant because it allows for predictions based on baseline OCT images.

Characteristics of Patients Who Drop Out of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

To investigate the dropout rate of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and identify the characteristics of dropout cases. We studied 235 eyes of 235 treatment-naïve BRVO-ME patients receiving intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. Additional intravitreal anti-VEGF drug was given when ME relapsed or persisted, and photocoagulation was performed as needed. Adherence until treatment completion was defined as disappearance of ME within 2 years after the first injection without recurrence for more than 6 months or mild ME remaining but no visual deterioration for more than 6 months without additional anti-VEGF drug. In patients with ME recurrence, those who were followed for more than 2 years were considered adherence, and those followed for less than 2 years were considered dropout. The clinical course and background of the two groups were compared. 179 patients (76.2%) adhered to treatment and 56 patients (23.8%) dropped out. Mean follow-up periods in adherence and dropout groups were 23.4 and 7.1 months, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in demographic and baseline factors of age, gender ratio, distance from home to hospital, visual acuity, and foveal thickness (FT). At the last follow-up, visual acuity was significantly poorer in the dropout group than in the adherence group (0.23 vs. 0.11 logMAR, p=0.003), and FT was significantly greater in the dropout group than in the adherence group (316 vs. 273 µm, p=0.002). Reasons for dropout included patient declining further treatment in 12.5%, progression of dementia in 8.9%, others, and unknown in 64.3%. The clinical outcome of patients who dropped out of anti-VEGF therapy for BRVO-ME was worse compared to patients who adhered to therapy, and the reasons for discontinuation varied.

May a post‐radiation ocular surface disorder compromise penetrating keratoplasty surgery? A case report

Aims/Purpose: Ocular surface disorder after ocular radiation therapy, even commonly reported, remains overlooked. Any delay in diagnosis may lead to vision threatening complications. The presented case highlights the clinical outcome of a severe post‐radiation ocular surface disorder, the importance of intense therapy and the limitations of further surgical interventions.Methods: Case report.Results: A 34‐year‐old woman was referred with complains of painful and reddish right eye since years. Her medical history revealed an iris melanoma excision at the age of 29 years. Due to recurrence, a proton beam treatment has been performed thereafter. Consequently, the patient developed post‐radiation retinopathy with macula edema, secondary glaucoma, cataract, as well as a severe ocular surface disorder with corneal decompensation and band keratopathy. Several surgical treatments have been attempted among which: phacoemulsification with IOL implantation, trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Due to refractory glaucoma a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage was necessitated, thereafter. Despite these various therapeutic approaches, there was no improvement of the ocular surface problem. With increasing deterioration of the corneal situation, a penetrating keratoplasty, has been discussed.Conclusions: The continuous worsening of clinical symptomatology of the proton beam radiotherapy ocular surface disorder can be the result of a post‐radiation syndrome. An ischaemic retinopathy and anterior segment disorder lead to engorgement of posterior and anterior segment tissues. Gradual expansion of ischemia, vasculitis and inflammatory mediators compresses the retinal tissue leading to recurrent macular oedema; as well as to secondary glaucoma and corneal decompensation. Due to the worsening of the clinical presentation of ocular surface disorder a penetrated keratoplastic surgery has been discussed. It remains however still questionable whether such patients would make profit from penetrated keratoplastic surgery, as the resulting corneal stromal lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis, in the presence of post‐radiation keratopathy, are essential conditions for allograft rejection.

Foveal Thickness Fluctuations in Anti-VEGF Treatment for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of foveal thickness (FT) fluctuation (FTF) on 2-year visual and morphological outcomes of eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) undergoing anti-VEGF treatment for recurrent macular edema (ME) based on a pro re nata regimen. Retrospective, observational case series. We analyzed 141 treatment-naive patients (141 eyes) with CRVO-ME at a multicenter retinal practice. We assessed FT using OCT at each study visit. Patients were divided into groups 0, 1, 2, and 3 according to increasing FTF. We evaluated the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the length of the foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) band defect measured using OCT, and the association of FTF with VA and EZ band defect length. The mean baseline logMAR BCVA and FT were 0.65±0.52 (Snellen equivalent range: 20/20-20/2000) and 661.1±257.4 μm, respectively. The mean number of anti-VEGF injections administered was 5.6±3.6. At the final examination, the mean logMAR BCVA and FT values were significantly improved relative to the baseline values (both P<0.01). During the observation, BCVA longitudinally improved in Groups 0 and 1, remained unchanged in Group 2, and worsened in Group 3. Likewise, the length of the foveal EZ band defect did not increase in Group 0; however, it gradually increased in Groups 1, 2, and 3. Foveal thickness fluctuation was significantly and positively associated with the logMAR BCVA and length of the foveal EZ band defect at the final examination (P<0.01). The final logMAR BCVA of patients developing neovascular complications was 1.27±0.72 (Snellen equivalent range: 20/50-counting fingers), which was significantly poorer than that of patients without complications (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the neovascular complication rate among the FTF groups (P=0.106, Fisher exact test). In eyes receiving anti-VEGF treatment for CRVO-ME, FTF can longitudinally impair the visual acuity and foveal photoreceptor status during the observation period, thus influencing the final outcomes. However, neovascular complications, which would also lead to a poor visual prognosis, may not be associated with FTF. The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept versus Bevacizumab for Naïve Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema: An Interim Analysis of a Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

To compare the efficacy of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) and bevacizumab (IVB) injections for the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 3 monthly IVZ (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) or IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) followed by the pro-re-nata protocol for persistent or recurrent macular edema. The primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness. An interim analysis was planned when half of the participants completed the follow-up. Twenty-four participants were recruited. At 6 months, mean best-corrected visual acuity in the IVB and IVZ groups improved from 1.23 ± 0.64 to 0.76 ± 0.56 logMAR (p = 0.003) and from 1.13 ± 0.59 to 0.53 ± 0.26 logMAR (p = 0.003), respectively. The percentage of visual improvement and reduction in central subfield thickness in the IVZ group were insignificantly better than those in the IVB group (44.41 ± 26.72 vs 39.64 ± 24.22%; p = 0.65) and (51.94 ± 20.35 vs 45.78 ± 24.71%; p = 0.51), respectively. Although the mean number of injections was lower in the IVZ group (4.55 ± 1.29 vs 4.82 ±1.33), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). No ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. The interim analysis demonstrated that the visual and anatomical results of IVZ were insignificantly better than those of IVB at 6 months of follow-up. The results also showed that IVZ was non-inferior to IVB for anatomical improvement but inconclusive for visual improvement. (identifier: TCTR20191205008).

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy with or Without Initial Steroid Therapy for Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

In branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), administering steroid injections to inhibit expression of inflammatory factors in the first phase of macular edema may reduce recurrence of the edema. The purpose of our study was to investigate the functional and morphological prognosis and frequency of recurrence after injection of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with and without initial steroid therapy to treat macular edema with BRVO. Patients with BRVO and macular edema (41 eyes) received intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI) alone (IRI group, 21 eyes) or subtenon triamcinolone (STTA) injection and IRI (combination group, 20 eyes). Patients in both groups with recurrent macular edema received further IRI as appropriate. A laser flare meter was used to assess aqueous flare values, and an optical coherence tomography device was used to measure central macular thickness (CMT). Before the first treatment, we obtained samples of aqueous humor and analyzed them by the suspension array method to evaluate VEGF, placental growth factor (PlGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and interferon-inducible 10-kDa protein (IP-10). The two groups were not significantly different with regard to levels of VEGF, PlGF, PDGF-AA, sICAM-1, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-8, or IP-10. Best-corrected visual acuity, CMT, and aqueous flare value (IRI group, baseline 8.69 ± 4.55 photon counts/ms; combination group, baseline 9.21 ± 3.72 photon counts/ms) improved significantly in both groups without significant intergroup differences. Analyses showed no significant intergroup differences in the mean number of IRIs during the 12-month follow-up, but the proportion of patients without recurrence (ie, who received only one IRI) was significantly higher in the combination group than in the IRI group (P = 0.032). Furthermore, the time to initial recurrence was significantly longer in the combination group than in the IRI group (P = 0.003). These findings suggest that initial STTA injection and IRI may have a synergistic effect in patients with BRVO and macular edema in that they increase the time between anti-VEGF treatments.

Retinal changes after fluocinolone acetonide implant (ILUVIEN®) for DME: SD-OCT imaging assessment using ESASO classification.

A detailed understanding of the anatomical and structural changes occurring in the retina following intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implantation may help improve the management and prognosis of persistent or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME). Overall, 45 eyes (from 35 patients) with refractory center-involved DME received an intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant. They were monitored at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and the seven retinal parameters used in the classification of diabetic maculopathy recently developed at the European School for Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology (ESASO). Within 6 months of implantation, significant improvements were evident in BCVA, CFT, maculopathy stage, and the percentage of eyes with: intraretinal cysts; CFT > 30% above the upper normal value; and disrupted or absent ellipsoid zone (EZ) and/or external limiting membrane (ELM). Significant improvements were still maintained at 36 months post-implantation. At month 36, early treatment with the implant (i.e., after < 6 previous intravitreal injections for DME) trended toward being more effective than later treatment in improving BCVA, CFT, maculopathy stage, and the percentage of eyes with CFT > 30% above the upper normal value. However, statistical significance was not achieved. In persistent or recurrent DME, fluocinolone acetonide implantation can be effective in improving maculopathy stage and reducing the percentage of eyes with: intraretinal cysts; CFT > 30% above the upper normal value; and disrupted or absent EZ and/or ELM. It can also increase BCVA and reduce CFT.

Intravitreal Therapy for Uveitic Macular Edema—Ranibizumab versus Methotrexate versus the Dexamethasone Implant: The MERIT Trial Results

To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 different intravitreal treatments for persistent or recurrent uveitic macular edema (ME): dexamethasone implant, methotrexate, and ranibizumab. Single-masked, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients with minimally active or inactive uveitis and persistent or recurrent uveitic ME in one or both eyes. Patients at 33 centers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 1 of the 3 therapies. Patients with bilateral ME received the same treatment in both eyes. The primary outcome, measured at 12 weeks, was reduction in central subfield thickness (CST) expressed as a proportion of baseline (CST per CST at baseline) assessed with spectral-domain OCT by readers masked to treatment assignment. Secondary outcomes included improvement and resolution of ME, change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP). One hundred ninety-four participants (225 eligible eyes) were randomized to dexamethasone (n= 65 participants and 77 eyes), methotrexate (n= 65 participants and 79 eyes), or ranibizumab (n= 64 participants and 69 eyes). All received at least 1 injection of the assigned treatment. At the 12-week primary outcome point, each group showed significant reductions in CST relative to baseline: 35%, 11%, and 22% for dexamethasone, methotrexate, and ranibizumab, respectively. Reduction of ME was significantly greater in the dexamethasone group than for either methotrexate (P < 0.01) or ranibizumab (P= 0.018). Only the dexamethasone group showed a statistically significant improvement in BCVA during follow-up (4.86 letters; P < 0.001). Elevations of IOP by 10 mmHg, to 24 mmHg or more, or both were more common in the dexamethasone group; IOP spikes to 30 mmHg or more were uncommon overall and were not significantly different among groups. Reductions in BCVA of 15 letters or more were more common in the methotrexate group and typically were attributable to persistent ME. At 12 weeks, in eyes with minimally active or inactive uveitis, dexamethasone was significantly better at treating persistent or recurrent ME than methotrexate or ranibizumab. Risk of IOP elevation was greater with dexamethasone, but elevations to levels of 30 mmHg or more were infrequent. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Macular ischemia in diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) is traditionally defined and graded on the angiographic evidence. However, these anatomical modifications are not surrogate markers for visual impairment. We suggest that there are vascular phenotypes of DMI based on the relative perfusion deficits of various retinal capillary plexuses and choriocapillaris. This review highlights several mechanistic pathways, including the role of hypoxia and the complex relation between neurons, glia, and microvasculature. Therefore, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is becoming the gold standard to identify the reversible DMI phenotypes. However, there is a need to standardize the nomenclature of OCTA perfusion status. Visual acuity is not an ideal endpoint for DMI clinical trials. New trial endpoints that represent disease progression need to be developed before irreversible vision loss in patients with DMI. Natural history studies are required to determine the course of each vascular and neuronal parameter to define the DMI phenotypes. These DMI phenotypes may also partly explain the development and recurrence of diabetic macular edema. Finally, we discuss a complete set of proposed therapeutic pathways for DMI, including cell-based therapies that may provide restorative potential.

Intravitreal versus Oral Steroids for Inflammation Control in Uveitic Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

ABSTRACT Background This prospective experimental study was conducted on 40 eyes of 40 patients with complicated uveitic cataracts to compare a single intraoperative intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) with oral steroids for inflammation control after cataract extraction. Methods The IVTA group (19 eyes) received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg/0.1 ml triamcinolone acetonide intraoperatively, and the oral steroid group (19 eyes) received oral steroids peri-operatively. Two patients had to be excluded from the study because they underwent extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), instead of phacoemulsification. Results A statistically significant difference was observed in the anterior chamber cell and flare response between both groups initially, but by the last follow-up, this became insignificant. None of the patients in each group experienced a recurrence of uveitis nor developed cystoid macular edema. Five patients in the oral steroid group had IOP >21 mmHg post-operatively. Conclusion A single injection of 4 mg IVTA has similar efficacy to peri-operative oral steroid administration.

Characterizing macular edema in retinitis pigmentosa through a combined structural and microvascular optical coherence tomography investigation

The aim of the study was to characterize macular edema (ME) in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) by means of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based imaging. The study was designed as observational, prospective case series, with 1-year follow-up. All RP patients underwent complete ophthalmologic assessment, including structural OCT, OCT angiography, and microperimetry (MP). The primary outcome was the characterization through quantitative OCT-based imaging of RP eyes complicated by ME. A total of 68 RP patients’ eyes (68 patients) and 68 eyes of 68 healthy controls were recruited. Mean BCVA was 0.14 ± 0.17 LogMAR at baseline and 0.18 ± 0.23 LogMAR at 1-year follow-up (p > 0.05). Thirty-four eyes (17 patients; 25%) showed ME, with a mean ME duration of 8 ± 2 months. Most of the eyes were characterized by recurrent ME. The ME was mainly localized in the inner nuclear layer in all eyes. LogMAR BCVA was similar in all RP eyes, whether with or without ME, although those with ME were associated with higher vessel density values, as well as thicker choroidal layers, than those without ME. In conclusion, the inner retina is closely involved in the pathogenesis of ME. The impairment of retinal-choroidal exchanges and Müller cell disruption might be a major pathogenic factor leading to the onset of ME in RP.

Retracted: Prognostic Factor Study of Macular Edema Recurrence in Retinal Vein Occlusion after Conbercept Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis of the FALCON Study

Retracted: Prognostic Factor Study of Macular Edema Recurrence in Retinal Vein Occlusion after Conbercept Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis of the FALCON Study