Rectal Washout Research Articles

Can neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy affect exfoliated cancer cells in colorectal cancer?

BackgroundTo prevent local recurrence caused by exfoliated cancer cells caught in the suture line, intraoperative rectal washout during surgery can be performed to eliminate exfoliated cancer cells. However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on exfoliated cancer cells is not well known. This study aimed to identify positive rate of malignant cells in rectal washout fluids of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy patients and to determine if neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could affect exfoliated cancer cells.MethodsA total of 105 patients who underwent rectal washout intraoperatively for distal sigmoid colon and rectal cancer from April 2020 to September 2021 were analyzed. The primary outcome was positive rate of malignant cells in rectal washout fluids of patients who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.ResultsThe positive rate of malignant cells in washout fluids of patients who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 0.0% and those who had not was 32.1%. The overall positive rate was 23.8%. In the positive group, tumor sizes were bigger (4.64 ± 1.68 cm vs. 3.64 ± 2.00 cm, p = 0.026) and more patients had a fungating tumor shown in preoperative colonoscopy (96.0% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.012). Although these factors did not show statistical significance in multivariable logistic regression analysis, fungating tumor showed a trend towards significance (OR: 7.28, 95% CI: 0.90-58.77, p = 0.063).ConclusionsOur study suggests that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could reduce exfoliated cancer cells, and rectal washout for the purpose of eliminating exfoliated cancer cells might be unnecessary in patients who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Simple, Rapid, Safe, and Cost-Effective Technique for Rectal Washout During Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Null.

Impact of Colorectal Nurse Specialist supervised parental administration of rectal washouts on Hirschsprung's disease outcomes: a retrospective review.

To highlight the utility of Colorectal Nurse Specialist (CNS) supervised parental administration of rectal washouts in the management of Hirschsprung's disease (HD). Retrospective case note review of HD patients treated at a tertiary children's hospital in United Kingdom from January 2011 to December 2022. Data collected included demographics, complications, enterocolitis, obstructive symptoms and stomas. Primary pull-through (PT) is done 8-12weeks after birth. Parental expertise in performing rectal washouts at home is ensured by our CNS team before and after PT. PT was completed in 69 of 74 HD patients. Rectal washouts were attempted on 63 patients before PT. Failure of rectal washout efficacy necessitated a stoma in four patients (6.4%). Of the 65 patients who had PT and stoma closed, three (4.5%) required a further stoma over a mean follow-up period of 57 months (Range 7-144 months). Two of these had intractable diarrhoea due to Total Colonic Aganglionosis (TCA). One patient (1.5%) had unmanageable obstructive symptoms requiring re-diversion. Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) requiring hospital admission occurred in 14 patients (21%). Our stoma rates are lower compared to recent UK data. This could potentially be due to emphasis on parental ability to perform effective rectal washouts at home under CNS supervision.

Contemporary diagnosis and management of colorectal injuries: What you need to know.

Colorectal injuries are commonly encountered by trauma surgeons. The management of colorectal injuries has evolved significantly over the past several decades, beginning with wartime experience and subsequently refining with prospective randomized studies. Colon injuries were initially nonoperative, evolved toward fecal diversion for all, and then became anatomic based with resection and primary anastomosis with selective diversion, and now primary repair, resection with primary anastomosis, and delayed anastomosis after damage-control laparotomy are all commonplace. Rectal injuries were also initially considered nonoperative until diversion came into favor. Diversion in addition to direct repair, presacral drain placement, and distal rectal washout became the criterion standard for extraperitoneal rectal injuries until drainage and washout fell out of favor. Despite a large body of evidence, there remains a debate on the optimal management of some colorectal injuries. This article will focus on how to diagnose and manage colorectal injuries. The aim of this review is to provide an evidence-based summary of the contemporary diagnosis and management of colorectal injuries.

Impact of rectal washout in local recurrence: a meta-analysis and systemic review.

Rectal washout is proposed for eliminating free cancer cells, yet evidence on its efficacy in preventing local recurrence after anterior resection is inconclusive. Contrasting rectal washout (RW) and non-rectal washout (NRW) in rectal cancer, a prospective study of randomized control trials (RCT) and non-randomized control trials (NRCT) from January 2005 to July 2023 was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases. Meta-statistical analysis in RevMan 5.4 addressed heterogeneity. In analysis involving 19,855 patients (15127 RW, 4728 NRW) from eight studies, RW significantly reduced local recurrence (OR = 0.48), intraoperative RW (OR = 0.65), radical resection margins (OR = 1.89), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR = 0.99) (all p < 0.05). Subgroup RCT analysis reinforced these findings. Rectal washout correlates with improved outcomes, while non-washout patients benefit more from neoadjuvant therapy. Notably, rectal washout without neoadjuvant remains efficacious.

Concurrence of Hirschsprung disease and annular pancreas: a rare case report

Hirschsprung’s disease (HD) and annular pancreas are both uncommon congenital gastrointestinal malformations. Although additional abnormalities are associated with 18% of HD cases, there is limited evidence of concomitant HD and annular pancreas. We present a full-term, two-day-old male with abdominal distended, and failure to pass first stool after 3 days of observation and rectal washout the abdominal X-rays showed a double bubble appearance. Intraoperative finding, the patient had pancreas annulare (PA). Colonic aganglionosis was discovered using full-thickness rectal biopsies (FTRB). At the age of seven months, a transanal endorectal pull-through was performed without complications. Although the diagnosis of these conditions might be difficult due to their clinical similarities, appropriate diagnosis, and surgical management are possible and can dramatically minimize morbidity and death in the newborn.

Faecal diversion remains central in the contemporary management of rectal trauma–Experience from a major trauma centre in South Africa

IntroductionThis paper provides an overview of a single centre's experience with rectal injury over a decade. It hopes to use this data to provide context to our current approach to managing these injuries in the civilian setting. The StudyAll patients with rectal trauma were identified from the Hybrid Electronic Medical Registry (HEMR). ResultsDuring the study period, a total of 88 patients with rectal injuries were admitted to Grey's Hospital in Pietermaritzburg. There were 80 (91 %) males and 8 (9 %) females. The median age was 31 (15–63) years. There were 9 (10 %) blunt mechanisms, 76 (86 %) penetrating mechanisms and 3 (4 %) combined blunt and penetrating mechanisms. Gunshot wounds accounted for the majority of sustained rectal trauma (71 %). There were 57 (65 %) extra-peritoneal injuries, 24 (27 %) intraperitoneal injuries and 7 (8 %) combined injuries. The grade of injury, according to the AAST grading system, was as follows, AAST 1: 16 (18 %), AAST 2: 63 (72 %), AAST 3: 7 (8 %), and AAST 4: 2 (2 %). Pre-sacral drainage and distal rectal washout were not performed. Almost all (55/57) of the extra-peritoneal rectal injuries were managed with proximal diversion (PD). There were five primary repairs (PR) performed in the extra-peritoneal rectal injury cohort. In four of these cases, this was accompanied by a PD. Of the 24 intraperitoneal rectal injuries, 15 underwent PR, of which 11 were performed in conjunction with PD. In total, 20 intraperitoneal rectal injuries underwent PD. All seven combined rectal injuries underwent PD, and three of the combined rectal injuries underwent PR with PD. There was urogenital tract associated morbidity in 8 %, gastrointestinal tract related morbidity in 8 % and septic complications in 11 %. ConclusionRectal trauma is still associated with a high rate of rectal/urogenital and infection related morbidity. Although pre-sacral drainage and distal stump washout have been largely abandoned in civilian practice, faecal diversion currently remains the cornerstone of the management of rectal trauma in our environment. Although there was a low rate of intra-abdominal septic complications in patients who had undergone diversion, this needs to be balanced against the low rate of stoma reversal.

Outcome of Primary Transanal pull through for Short segment Hirschsprung's disease in children without frozen section

BackgroundHirschsprung's disease is a congenital disorder of the enteric nervous system. There are many type of pull through surgeries (e.g.) Duhamel, Soave, Swenson etc. and are done openly as well as laparoscopically. This can be performed in multiple stages or in a single stage (primary). MethodologyThis cross sectional study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from January 2022 till December 2022, after approval from ethical committee (IRB # 489/LRH/MTI). All Children up to 16 year age presented with short segment Hirschsprung's disease on contrast enema and with confirmed absence of ganglion cells on rectal biopsy were included in the study. Patients with syndromic Hirschsprung's disease, those with stoma, previous surgery, not responding/compliant to rectal washout and parents unwilling for the procedure were excluded. All patient underwent Primary Transanal Pull Through (PTAPT) without frozen section. All patients were followed up to 6 months post-op. ResultsOut of 88 patients, 18(20.4%) had complications. Anastomotic stricture was found to be the most common. Complications were found to be more in male patients who were less than 6 months old. None of the patient had aganglionic or transitional zone pull through. ConclusionPTAPT can be done safely in Short segment Hirschsprung's disease in centers without frozen section facility with comparable results. At least 5 cm resection should be done proximal to the transition zone to avoid aganglionic bowel or transition zone pull through. The incidence of complications is more in males and in patients aged less than 6 months. Level of evidenceLevel IV

Impact of rectal washout on recurrence and survival after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Rectal washout (RW) is routinely performed during anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer to reduce local recurrence (LR), although is sometimes not performed during minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures due to technical challenges and time consumption. The aim was to investigate the impact of RW on the oncological outcome after AR for rectal cancer in a registry cohort. Data on patients registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry who had undergone elective radical (R0) AR for TNM stage I-III rectal cancer between 2007 and 2017 with a 3-year follow-up were analysed. Multivariable analyses were performed and the primary endpoint was LR at 3 and 5 years after AR. The occurrence of distant metastasis (DM) and overall recurrence (OAR), overall survival, and relative survival were also analysed as a secondary aim. A subgroup analysis was performed for the same outcomes in patients treated with MIS. Out of 6186 patients (1923 with TNM stage I, 1907 with TNM stage II, and 2356 with TNM stage III), RW was performed in 5706 (92.2 per cent). The median age of the cohort was 67 years. RW did not impact the 3-year risk of LR. LR within 5 years occurred in 104 of 4583 patients (2.3 per cent) in the RW group compared with 16 of 408 patients (3.9 per cent) in the no RW group (P = 0.037). In multivariable analysis of the LR risk, the HR was 0.53 (95 per cent c.i. 0.31 to 0.90), favouring RW. There were no differences in rates of DM and OAR, overall survival, and relative survival. A subgroup analysis of the 1410 patients undergoing MIS did not demonstrate any differences between the groups, given, however, the low rate of LR. RW in AR for rectal cancer does not impact the 3-year oncological outcome; however, after the 5-year follow-up a reduction in LR risk was observed after RW.

Local recurrence at the site of the Lone Star device through implantation of exfoliated cells during local excision for early rectal cancer: A case report.

IntroductionInvasive procedures for colorectal cancer can cause iatrogenic tumor cell seeding. Implantation of these exfoliated cells in the surrounding tissue can result in locoregional cancer recurrence. This has been described in endoscopic procedures and major surgical resections, however recurrence in iatrogenic lesions of the anal canal during minimal invasive rectal surgery has not been shown in literature yet. This is the first reported case of recurrent rectal cancer that developed into an anal metastasis at the site where hooks of the Lone Star Retractor disrupted the epithelial lining of the anal canal during a local excision of early rectal cancer using TAMIS.Presentation of caseA 57 year old male was diagnosed with a high risk early stage rectal adenocarcinoma. He was treated with transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with the use of a Lone Star retractor and he received subsequent chemo-radiotherapy. 23 months later the patient developed a bleeding mass bulging out of the anus. A true cut and incision biopsy was performed and the pathology report revealed localization of adenocarcinoma at the anal canal which was similar to the earlier diagnosed rectal carcinoma. The patient underwent an abdominal perineal resection and left-sided lymph node dissection.Discussion and conclusionThis shows that local recurrence through implantation of exfoliated tumor cells can occur in iatrogenic lesions of the anal canal not only in major but also in minimal invasive rectal surgery. Careful tissue handling and rectal washout may reduce the chance of this implantation metastasis.

The influence of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence of colorectal cancer following curative resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To determine the effectiveness of rectal washout in preventing local recurrence of distal colorectal cancer following curative resection. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed after a literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ISRCTN registry. The study was reported using PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoint was incidence of local recurrence of cancer after distal colonic and rectal cancer surgery. After screening, 8 studies with a total sample size of 6739 patients were identified. At 5-year follow-up, local recurrence in the washout group (WO) was 6.08% compared to 9.48% in the no-washout group (NWO) group (OR 0.63, 95% CI = 0.51-0.78, Chi2 = 6.76, df = 7, p = 0.45). The relative risk reduction was 36.9%. To exclude a 36.9% relative risk reduction from 9.48 to 6.08% with a 5% significance level and 80% power a randomized control trial would require a total sample size of 1946 participants distributed equally between the two treatment arms. It is safe to recommend the use of rectal washout for left sided and rectal tumour resections. It is a simple and safe step during colorectal surgery that appears to improve long-term oncological outcomes and was not reported to be associated with any complications.

Intraoperative adverse events as a risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer after resection surgery.

AimFailure to achieve a radical resection as well as intraoperative rectal perforation are important risk factors for local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery, but the importance of other intraoperative adverse events for the prognosis is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of intraoperative adverse events during rectal cancer surgery, and to determine whether these were associated with an increased risk of local recurrence.MethodsA retrospective population‐based cohort study was undertaken, including all patients in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, who had undergone primary resection surgery for rectal cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2014, registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Data were retrieved from the registry and through review of the medical records.ResultsIn total, 1208 patients were included in the study of whom 78 (6%) developed local recurrence during the follow‐up period of at least 5 years. Intraoperative adverse events were common and occurred in 62/78 (79%) of patients with local recurrence compared to 604/1130 (53%) of patients without local recurrence. In multivariate analysis intraoperative adverse events were found to be an independent risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer, as were nonradical resection, a high pathological T stage, the presence of lymph node metastases, type of surgery and refraining from rectal washout during anterior resection and Hartmann's procedure.ConclusionsIntraoperative adverse events were found to be an independent risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer and could possibly be used together with other known risk factors to select patients for intensified postoperative surveillance.

Rectal washout during abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer has no impact on the oncological outcome.

Intraoperative rectal washout is performed to eliminate exfoliated intraluminal cancer cells and thereby decrease the risk of local recurrence. Rectal washout in abdominoperineal resection has not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcome after rectal washout in abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer and to find evidence as to whether rectal washout should be performed or not. Data for all patients registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry who underwent elective surgery with abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (TNM Stages I-III) between 2007 and 2013 were analysed using multivariable analysis. No significant differences were shown between the rectal washout group and the no rectal washout group for local recurrence [10/265 (3.8%) vs. 87/2160 (4.0%), p=0.84], distant metastasis [51/265 (19.2%) vs. 476/2160 (22.0%), p=0.29] or overall recurrence [53/265 (20.0%) vs. 505/2160 (23.4%), p=0.21]. In multivariable analysis, rectal washout did not significantly affect the oncological outcome in terms of local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall recurrence or 5-year overall or relative survival. Our results do not support routine rectal washout during abdominoperineal resection in order to improve the oncological outcome.

SP1.2.12A meta-analysis of the impact of rectal washout on local recurrence following anterior resection for rectal cancers

Abstract Background Standardisation of surgical technique in form of total mesorectal excision (TME) and the use of preoperative radiotherapy have led to improved oncological outcomes in rectal cancer. However, the effectiveness of rectal washout in reducing local recurrence (LR) following anterior resection remains debatable. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of rectal washout in reducing incidence of LR after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods A literature search of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane was performed for studies that compared rectal washout to no washout after anterior resection using TME for rectal cancers. The review included all articles reporting oncological outcome of local recurrence. Meta-analysis was carried out using random effect model. Results A total of 5 studies involving 5315 patients were included in meta-analysis. Median follow-up was 60 (range 33–60) months. Overall local recurrence rate was 6.6 % with no significant difference in LR rate between the rectal washout and no washout groups (5.23% vs. 9 %)(P = 0.93; RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.52- 1.83).Similarly in subgroup analysis including prospective studies only no significant difference in LR was seen after washout (P = 0.06) or in group of patients treated with a curative intent(P = 0.50). LR was significantly lower in patients who had a rectal washout with normal saline (P &amp;lt; 0.00001; RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.47-0.74). Conclusion This meta-analysis shows that there is no benefit of rectal washout in reducing incidence of local recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancers.

Low presence of intraluminal cancer cells in rectal washout during transanal total mesorectal excision

Low presence of intraluminal cancer cells in rectal washout during transanal total mesorectal excision

780 Effectiveness of Colonic/Rectal Washout in Reducing Risk of Local Recurrence in Rectal and Distal Left Sided Colonic Cancer Resection. A Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Lab and clinical studies have shown evidence that local recurrence (LR) occurs due to free cancer cells at resection sites. Evidence for the effectiveness of rectal washout (RW) in washing out these cells and reducing the incidence of local recurrence in the literature is equivocal. Aims To determine whether intraoperative RW can effectively reduce the incidence of LR in rectal and distal colonic tumour resection. Method A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoint was incidence of local recurrence of cancer after rectal cancer surgery. Results The meta-analysis revealed that at 5 year follow up, local recurrence in the washout group (WO) was 6.08% compared to 9.48% in the no-washout group (NWO) group (OR 0.63, 95% CI = 0.51 –0.73, Chi2 = 6.76, df = 7, p = 0.45). Based on this study we found the number needed to treat would be 29.3 (95%CI 20.9 –56.6) in order to prevent one local recurrence at 5 years. Conclusions RW reduces the risk of LR in patients with distal colorectal cancer resection in the long term follow up. A small number of patients needed to be treated to avoid one local recurrence in the five year follow up.

Endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure for penetrating rectal injury in a pediatric patient

Abstract Purpose Endoluminal Vacuum-assisted closure therapy (EVT) has been employed to assist in closure of rectal defects with high success rates. Most of the literature is focused on the use of EVT after anastomotic leaks, and has been limited in the pediatric population to esophageal defects. We describe a case report of the successful use of EVT in a penetrating rectal injury in a pediatric patient. Results The patient is a 15-year-old male who suffered a traumatic 6 cm full thickness penetrating anorectal injury, initially treated with fecal diversion, pre-sacral drainage, and distal rectal washout. He developed worsening pre-sacral abscess and was subsequently treated with EVT for 10 weeks with successful closure of the defect. Upon completion, he had restoration of intestinal continuity and maintained fecal continence. Conclusions EVT can be used to successfully manage penetrating rectal injuries in the pediatric population. This can avoid extensive surgical resection or permanent ostomy and help control sepsis.

Rectal washout does not increase the complication risk after anterior resection for rectal cancer

BackgroundTo reduce local recurrence risk, rectal washout (RW) is integrated in the total mesorectal excision (TME) technique when performing anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer. Although RW is considered a safe practice, data on the complication risk are scarce. Our aim was to examine the association between RW and 30-day postoperative complications after AR for rectal cancer.MethodsPatients from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry who underwent AR between 2007 and 2013 were analysed using multivariable methods.ResultsA total of 4821 patients were included (4317 RW, 504 no RW). The RW group had lower rates of overall complications (1578/4317 (37%) vs. 208/504 (41%), p = 0.039), surgical complications (879/4317 (20%) vs. 140/504 (28%), p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (50/4317 (1.2%) vs. 12/504 (2.4%), p = 0.020). In multivariable analysis, RW was a risk factor neither for overall complications (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60–0.90, p = 0.002) nor for surgical complications (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78, p < 0.001).ConclusionsRW is a safe technique that does not increase the 30-day postoperative complication risk after AR with TME technique for rectal cancer.

The Prevalence and Clinical Profile of Hirschsprung's Disease at a Tertiary Hospital in Bahrain.

BackgroundHirschsprung’s disease (HD) is a rare but important congenital pediatric disease of the colon, and its incidence varies widely between ethnic groups. Its incidence was first studied in Bahrain in 1980 using hospital-based data. Over a 16-month period, 10 cases were reported, representing a relatively high incidence rate: 1 per 4000 births. Even though the number of live births in Bahrain has increased dramatically over the last four decades (doubling from 10,000 to 20,000 per year), published studies about the incidence of HD are uncommon. In this research, we aimed to determine both the prevalence and the clinical characteristics of HD at a tertiary hospital in Bahrain.MethodsThis retrospective observational cross-sectional study included children diagnosed with HD at a tertiary hospital in Bahrain over the last seven years (2014-2020). Children over 10 years were excluded. Clinical data collected included gestational age, birth weight, gender, associated anomalies, clinical features at presentation, disease management, and complications.ResultsThe prevalence of HD in Bahrain was found to be 1.3 per 10,000 live births, according to 18 patients qualified for inclusion in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 18 days; approximately 72% were males, and nearly 94% were Bahraini nationals. Three patients (16.7%) had associated anomalies including cardiac and urogenital malformations. Abdominal distention was the most common clinical presentation (83.3%) followed by constipation (77.8%). Half of the patients (50%) passed meconium within 48 hours of birth. Transanal full-thickness rectal biopsy was the method of diagnosis in most patients (83.3%). Seven patients (38.9%) were diagnosed comparatively late (beyond the neonatal period), at a mean age of 1-2 years. Significant associations between age at diagnosis and clinical presentation, initial management, or surgical intervention were not found. A total of 17 patients (94.4%) underwent the definitive surgery (transanal pull-through procedure). In this surgical group, initial colonic decompression was performed via rectal washout in six patients (35.3%) and via temporary stoma in three patients (17.8%). Laparotomy combined with the definitive surgery was necessary for six patients (35.3%). Most of the patients treated surgically had a short segment disease (70.5%).ConclusionsThe awareness of HD is highly important, especially with more than one-third of cases diagnosed outside the neonatal period and half of them passing meconium within 48 hours of birth. In addition, early detection of HD in the neonatal period would result in a less complicated course by reducing the number of patients requiring a multi-stage surgery and further laparotomies.

Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout

BackgroundTransrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery is currently limited by the inherent risk of surgical site infection due to peritoneal contamination after rectotomy. Coloshield has been developed as a temporary colon occlusion device to facilitate rectal washout. However, effectiveness and safety has not been evaluated in humans.MethodsTwenty-two patients have been randomly assigned to undergo proctological intervention with a rectal washout with and without the use of Coloshield. Patients and assessors were blinded. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) has been determined 30 min as well as immediately after rectal washout. Feasibility, pain, intra- and postoperative morbidity as well as bowel function and continence 6 weeks after surgery were assessed.ResultsBBPS 30 min after rectal washout with and without Coloshield was in mean 2.42 ± 1.02 and 2.12 ± 0.89 (p = 0.042). Mean BBPS immediately after rectal washout was 2.39 ± 1.02 and 2.24 ± 0.66 (p = 0.269). Mean BBPS immediately after rectal washout and 30 min thereafter did not differ (p = 0.711). Coloshield application was feasible without any complications. The median (interquartile range) numeric rating scale for pain 4 h after surgery was 1 (0–1) and 3 (0–4) (p = 0.212). Six weeks after surgery 0/11 and 1/11 patients suffered from evacuation difficulties (p = 1.0) and the median Vaizey–Wexner score was 1 (0–3) and 1 (0–2) (p = 0.360).ConclusionsColoshield application in humans is feasible and safe. Slight benefits in rectal preparation by washout are found when Coloshield is used. Colon occlusion by Coloshield for transrectal NOTES should be evaluated within clinical studies.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02579330