Rectal Cancer Survivors Research Articles

Association of physical activity with health-related quality of life in rectal cancer survivors

Abstract Background Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in rectal cancer survivors after completion of surgical treatment may be influenced by various factors including physical activity. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between regular exercise and physical and mental health in rectal cancer survivors. Methods People who underwent surgical resection of rectal cancer with temporary ileostomy from 2018 to 2021 were invited to participate. Participants were drawn from the Clinic for Digestive Surgery and the Clinic for Emergency Surgery of the University Clinical Center of Serbia, as well as the nationwide laparoscopic program - LapSerb consortium. Data were collected through interviews in late 2022 and early 2023. The HRQoL was evaluated using the physical composite score (PCS) and mental composite score (MCS) of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Socio-demographic, clinical and behavioral characteristics including the frequency of exercise were analyzed in multiple linear regression models. Results A total of 134 rectal cancer survivors were tested. Few participants (18.7%) exercised regularly, while most of the study population occasionally (41.8%) or never engaged (39.5%) in physical activity. Rectal cancer survivors who exercised regularly had significantly higher scores of physical (75.5 vs. 62.8, p = 0.019) and mental quality of life (78.9 vs. 63.8, p = 0.008). Regular exercise remained associated with better physical and mental health after the adjustment for demographic, clinical and behavioral characteristics. Conclusions Consistent physical exercise seems to be significant contributor of better physical and mental quality of life in rectal cancer survivors after completion of surgical treatment. Key messages • Physical exercise may help rectal cancer survivors improve their physical and mental health. • Promotion of physcial activity in rectal cancer survivors could optimize recovery after surgery.

The bowel function instrument for rectal cancer survivors with anastomosis and ostomy

ObjectiveRectal cancer is often treated with surgery such as ostomy or anastomosis. The Bowel Function Instrument (BFI) is a valid and reliable 18-item measure of physical bowel symptoms. Some items on the BFI do not apply to those with ostomies. We reanalyzed data from a previous validation study to inform the best method for scoring the BFI for both people with ostomies and anastomosis. MethodsPeople (n = 575) with rectal cancer treated with ostomy (n = 181, 31 %) or anastomosis (n = 394, 69 %) completed the BFI and Short Form 12 (SF12) measure on a mailed survey. The full BFI has three subscales and a total score based on 14 items: soilage/urgency (4 items); frequency of bowel movements (6 items); and dietary changes (4 items). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine two versions (8-item, 11-item) of the BFI adapted for use with both ostomy and anastomosis. We also examined reliability and validity of the version supported by the CFA. ResultsCFA results supported the 8-item BFI that included only the soilage/urgency items and dietary changes items but not the frequency items. The 8-item BFI was reliable (Cronbach's alpha of 0.788). The 8-item BFI score significantly correlated with all SF12 subscales with Pearson correlations ranging from 0.115 (Vitality) to 0.318 (social function). ConclusionsThe 8-item version of the BFI was valid and reliable as a total score for people with ostomy or anastomosis. The 8-item BFI may be useful for monitoring bowel function during and after treatment for rectal cancer.

CN71 A nurse-led clinic stepped-care intervention for rectal cancer survivors with bowel problems

CN71 A nurse-led clinic stepped-care intervention for rectal cancer survivors with bowel problems

Earnings and work loss after colon and rectal cancer: a Swedish nationwide matched cohort study

Colorectal cancer is common and prognosis is improving. The conditions of survivors of treatment, including financial consequences, are thus important. The aim of this study was to quantify loss of earnings and work loss in working-age patients with colon and rectal cancer relative to matched comparators. The study utilised data from the CRCBaSe database that is generated from the nationwide Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Register and includes data from several Swedish nationwide registers. The study period was 1995-2020 for rectal cancer patients and 2007-2020 for colon cancer patients. A retrospective population-based nationwide cohort study on earnings, disposable income, and work loss, in survivors of stage I-III colorectal cancer treatment was undertaken. Median regression was used to analyse earnings and disposable income, and logistic regression to analyse the probability of work loss. A cohort of 8863 colorectal cancer survivors diagnosed before 2017 and 52,514 comparators matched on birth year, legal sex, and county of residence, was analysed. There was a clear reduction in earnings between the calendar year prior to and the calendar year after diagnosis, from € 31,319 to € 23,924 for colon cancer patients and from € 32,636 to € 22,647 for rectal cancer patients, and earnings never fully recovered during the 5-year follow-up. Disposable income was practically unaltered. The probability of work loss increased in the calendar year of diagnosis, from 29.8% to 25.3% the previous year to 83.3% and 84.4% for colon and rectal cancer patients respectively, and never fully recovered. The probability of work loss was similar between colon and rectal cancer survivors, but was higher among patients with rectal cancer who had received neoadjuvant therapy. This study shows that despite an extensive welfare system providing maintained disposable income, there is a financial burden in the form of increased risk of work loss and a reduction in earnings among survivors of colorectal cancer. The study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Cancer and Allergy Foundation, and the Stockholm Cancer Society, and supported by grants provided by the Regional Agreement on Medical Training and Clinical Research (ALF) between the Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet.

Quantifying societal burden of radiation-induced small bowel toxicity in patients with rectal cancer.

Advancements in rectal cancer (RC) treatment not only led to an increase in lives saved but also improved quality of life (QoL). Notwithstanding these benefits, RC treatment comes at the price of gastrointestinal morbidity in many patients. Health economic modelling poses an opportunity to explore the societal burden of such side-effects. This study aims to quantify radiation-induced late small bowel (SB) toxicity in survivors of RC for Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT), Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy - Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IMRT/IGRT). Materials and A model-based health economic evaluation was performed. The theoretical cohort consists of a case-mix of survivors of RC aged 25-99 years according to Belgian age-specific incidence rates. A societal perspective was adopted. The base case analysis was complemented with one-way deterministic analyses, deterministic scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (1,000 iterations). Results were presented as mean lifetime incremental cost (€) and utility (QALYs) per patient. The analyses showed that the use of innovative radiotherapy (RT) improves lifetime QoL in survivors of RC by 0.11 QALYs and 0.05 QALYs by preferring IMRT/IGRT and IMRT over 3D-CRT, respectively. The use of IMRT/IGRT and IMRT results in an incremental cost-saving of €3,820 and €1,863 per patient, solely by radiation-induced SB toxicity, compared to 3D-CRT. It is important to consider late toxicity effects in decisions regarding investments and reimbursement as our analysis highlighted the potential long-term cost-savings and improved QoL of novel RT techniques in patients with rectal cancer.

Longitudinal Risk Analysis of Second Primary Cancer after Curative Treatment in Patients with Rectal Cancer.

Predicting and improving the response of rectal cancer to second primary cancers (SPCs) remains an active and challenging field of clinical research. Identifying predictive risk factors for SPCs will help guide more personalized treatment strategies. In this study, we propose that experience data be used as evidence to support patient-oriented decision-making. The proposed model consists of two main components: a pipeline for extraction and classification and a clinical risk assessment. The study includes 4402 patient datasets, including 395 SPC patients, collected from three cancer registry databases at three medical centers; based on literature reviews and discussion with clinical experts, 10 predictive variables were considered risk factors for SPCs. The proposed extraction and classification pipelines that classified patients according to importance were age at diagnosis, chemotherapy, smoking behavior, combined stage group, and sex, as has been proven in previous studies. The C5 method had the highest predicted AUC (84.88%). In addition, the proposed model was associated with a classification pipeline that showed an acceptable testing accuracy of 80.85%, a recall of 79.97%, a specificity of 88.12%, a precision of 85.79%, and an F1 score of 79.88%. Our results indicate that chemotherapy is the most important prognostic risk factor for SPCs in rectal cancer survivors. Furthermore, our decision tree for clinical risk assessment illuminates the possibility of assessing the effectiveness of a combination of these risk factors. This proposed model may provide an essential evaluation and longitudinal change for personalized treatment of rectal cancer survivors in the future.

Exploring patients' needs and expectations for information on sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment: A qualitative study.

Sexual dysfunction is an important, and often overlooked, sequela of rectal cancer treatment with significant implications for patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to explore patients' information needs regarding sexual health after rectal cancer treatment and their experiences accessing information on sexual dysfunction throughout the cancer care continuum. The secondary aim was to explore surgeons' perspectives on patients' information needs and gain insight into their experiences providing information on sexual health following rectal cancer surgery. A qualitative study was conducted using semistructured interviews with 10 rectal cancer survivors and six colorectal surgeons from a Canadian tertiary care institution. Transcribed interviews were coded independently by two researchers and thematic analysis was performed. Analysis of patient interviews revealed that patients had limited knowledge of sexual dysfunction symptoms following rectal cancer treatment and received inadequate information on sexual dysfunction from their treating medical team. Patients expressed the desire to receive information on sexual dysfunction in different formats, especially before the start of treatment. The surgeon interviews revealed that colorectal surgeons faced challenges when informing patients about sexual dysfunction. Surgeons did not routinely provide information on sexual dysfunction to all patients; however, they felt that patients should receive high-quality information on sexual dysfunction, both before and after treatment. Patients' information needs related to sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment were inadequately met. High-quality informational resources are needed to facilitate communication between patients and physicians and improve patients' understanding of sexual dysfunction.

Baseline characteristics and recruitment for SWOG S1820: altering intake, managing bowel symptoms in survivors of rectal cancer (AIMS-RC)

PurposeMany survivors of rectal cancer experience persistent bowel dysfunction. There are few evidence-based symptom management interventions to improve bowel control. The purpose of this study is to describe recruitment and pre-randomization baseline sociodemographic, health status, and clinical characteristics for SWOG S1820, a trial of the Altering Intake, Managing Symptoms in Rectal Cancer (AIMS-RC) intervention.MethodsSWOG S1820 aimed to determine the preliminary efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of AIMS-RC, a symptom management intervention for bowel health, comparing intervention to attention control. Survivors with a history of cancers of the rectosigmoid colon or rectum, within 6–24 months of primary treatment completion, with a post-surgical permanent ostomy or anastomosis, and over 18 years of age were enrolled. Outcomes included total bowel function, low anterior resection syndrome, quality of life, motivation for managing bowel health, self-efficacy for managing symptoms, positive and negative affect, and study feasibility and acceptability.ResultsThe trial completed accrual over a 29-month period and enrolled 117 participants from 34 institutions across 17 states and one US Pacific territory. At baseline, most enrolled participants reported self-imposed diet adjustments after surgery, persistent dietary intolerances, and bowel discomfort post-treatment, with high levels of constipation and diarrhea (grades 1–4).ConclusionsSWOG S1820 was able to recruit, in a timely manner, a study cohort that is demographically representative of US survivors of rectal cancer. Baseline characteristics illustrate the connection between diet/eating and bowel symptoms post-treatment, with many participants reporting diet adjustments and persistent inability to be comfortable with dietary intake.ClinicalTrials.gov registration date12/19/2019.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT#04205955.

The Invisible Co-afflicted: Caregivers of Rectal Cancer Survivors.

The Invisible Co-afflicted: Caregivers of Rectal Cancer Survivors.

Long-term Changes in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Survivors of Rectal Cancer: Longitudinal Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Postoperative bowel dysfunction, also known as low anterior resection syndrome, is common in rectal cancer survivors and significantly impacts quality of life. Although long-term longitudinal follow-up is lacking, improvement of the syndrome is commonly believed to happen only within the first 2 years. This study aimed to depict the longitudinal evolvement of low anterior resection syndrome beyond 3 years and explore factors associated with changes. Longitudinal long-term follow-ups were performed for the single center with the largest cohort within the multicenter FOWARC randomized controlled trial. A quaternary referral center. Individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer who received long-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, followed by sphincter-preserving radical proctectomy. Change of low anterior resection syndrome score and stoma status. Of the 220 patients responding to the first follow-up at a median of 39 months, 178 (80.9%) responded to the second follow-up after a median of 83 months. During this interval, the mean low anterior resection syndrome score improved from 29.5 (95% CI, 28.3-30.7) to 18.6 (95% CI, 16.6-20.6). Fifty-six (31.5%) patients reported improvement from major to no/minor severity, and 6 (3.4%) patients had new stomas because of severe bowel dysfunction. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy ( p = 0.016) was independently and negatively associated with improvement of the score. Loss of follow-up during the long-term follow-ups. Most rectal cancer survivors with low anterior resection syndrome continued to improve beyond 3 years after proctectomy. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was negatively associated with long-term improvement of low anterior resection syndrome. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:La disfunción intestinal posoperatoria, también conocida como síndrome de resección anterior baja, es común en los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto y afecta significativamente la calidad de vida. Aunque falta un seguimiento longitudinal a largo plazo, comúnmente se cree que la mejoría del síndrome ocurre sólo dentro de los primeros dos años.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo representar la evolución longitudinal del síndrome de resección anterior baja más allá de los 3 años y explora los factores asociados con el cambio.DISEÑO:Se realizaron seguimientos longitudinales a largo plazo para el único centro con la cohorte más grande dentro del ensayo controlado aleatorio multicéntrico FOWARC.AJUSTE:Un centro de referencia cuaternario.PACIENTES:Individuos diagnosticados con cáncer de recto que recibieron quimioterapia neoadyuvante de larga duración o quimiorradioterapia, seguida de proctectomía radical con preservación del esfínter.PRINCIPALES MEDICIONES DE RESULTADO:Cambio en la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja y el estado del estoma.RESULTADOS:De los 220 pacientes que respondieron al primer seguimiento con una mediana de 39 meses, 178 (80,9%) respondieron al segundo seguimiento después de una mediana de 83 meses. Durante el intervalo, la puntuación media del síndrome de resección anterior baja mejoró de 29,5 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 28,3-30,7) a 18,6 (IC del 95%: 16,6-20,6). 56 (31,5%) pacientes informaron una mejoría de mayor a ninguna gravedad, y 6 (3,4%) pacientes tuvieron un nuevo estoma debido a una disfunción intestinal grave. La radiación neoadyuvante (p = 0,016) se asoció de forma independiente y negativa con la mejora de la puntuación.LIMITACIONES:Pérdida de seguimiento durante los seguimientos a largo plazo.CONCLUSIÓN:La mayoría de los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto con síndrome de resección anterior baja continuaron mejorando más allá de los 3 años después de la proctectomía. La radiación neoadyuvante se asoció negativamente con la mejora a largo plazo del síndrome de resección anterior baja. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).

SWOG S1820: A pilot randomized trial of the Altering Intake, Managing Bowel Symptoms Interventionin Survivors of Rectal Cancer.

Survivors of rectal cancer experience persistent bowel dysfunction after treatments. Dietary interventions may be an effective approach for symptom management and posttreatment diet quality. SWOG S1820 was a pilot randomized trial of the Altering Intake, Managing Symptoms in Rectal Cancer (AIMS-RC) intervention for bowel dysfunction in survivors of rectal cancer. Ninety-three posttreatment survivors were randomized to the AIMS-RC group (N=47) or the Healthy Living Education attention control group (N=46) after informed consent and completion of a prerandomization run-in. Outcome measures were completed at baseline and at 18 and 26weeks postrandomization. The primary end point was total bowel function score, and exploratory end points included low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score, quality of life, dietary quality, motivation, self-efficacy, and positive/negative affect. Most participants were White and college educated, with a mean age of 55.2years and median time since surgery of 13.1months. There were no statistically significant differences in total bowel function score by group, with the AIMS-RC group demonstrating statistically significant improvements in the exploratory end points of LARS (p=.01) and the frequency subscale of the bowel function index (p=.03). The AIMS-RC group reported significantly higher acceptability of the study. SWOG S1820 did not provide evidence of benefit from the AIMS-RC intervention relative to the attention control. Select secondary end points did demonstrate improvements. The study was highly feasible and acceptable for participants in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. Findings provide strong support for further refinement and effectiveness testing of the AIMS-RC intervention.

Factors affecting quality of life in rectal cancer survivors who have undergone laparoscopic surgery: patient-reported outcomes over 10 years at a single institution.

Colorectal cancer survivors have many problems affecting their quality of life (QOL). Traditional follow-up focuses on the detection of recurrence rather than QOL. Efforts are being made to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) more formally. Such changes may enable patients to consider QOL factors when deciding on treatment. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2015 at a single institution were identified and sent European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 QOL questionnaires. QOL and the impact of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and formation of end colostomy were assessed. Some 141 patients were identified: 12 died and 118 (83.7%) responded, of whom 101 completed the questionnaires and 17 declined to participate; 11 were lost to follow-up. Mean age was 67 years, median follow-up was 58 months. Median QOL score was 6 (maximum 7) and 4.5% of patients reported a poor QOL score (<4). Significant rectal/perianal pain, sexual dysfunction and urinary symptoms were reported in 3.6%, 10.9% and 2.7% of respondents, respectively. Significant differences between treatment groups were uncommon. All cohorts reported similar QOL, functional and symptom scores. These results compare favourably with the published data. Future studies may benefit from baseline assessment to better assess treatment impact, prescient in an increasingly elderly and comorbid population. This paper establishes that good PROMs are achievable with laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. It identifies limited differences in QOL between treatment modalities. Restoration of intestinal continuity and end colostomy result in similar QOL. This may address common concerns regarding stomata, sexual function and low anterior resection syndrome in this cohort.

Evaluation of the psychosocial needs of post-radiotherapy rectal cancer survivors and their direct caregivers in Hong Kong: A pilot study.

504 Background: Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in Hong Kong. Radiotherapy has been established as an indispensable component during treatment of rectal cancer. Radiation-induced adverse effects are common for radiotherapy patients, severely affecting the quality of life of both the patients and their caregivers. Although previous studies have demonstrated the impacts of radiation-induced adverse effects on the quality of life of rectal radiotherapy patients, little were studied about the impacts on the patients’ and their direct caregivers’ psychosocial health. As there was no previous similar study done in local context, this research serves as a pilot study for improving the understanding of psychosocial needs and quality of life of rectal radiotherapy patients and their direct caregivers in Hong Kong. Methods: This study was a prospective and observational research. Rectal radiotherapy patients and their direct caregivers were recruited from Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong from 2022 to 2023. The primary endpoint was the questionnaire assessment of psychosocial needs and quality of life of rectal radiotherapy patients and their direct caregivers before and after radiotherapy treatment. Questionnaires in different versions for the patients and their direct caregivers before radiotherapy treatment, 3-month and 6-month post-radiotherapy courses were distributed. Results: Twenty-four subjects were recruited, including 13 patients and 11 caregivers. The results show that rectal radiotherapy patients worried about their health in the future. Their direct caregivers’ emotional and intimate lives were affected. Nevertheless, the patients’ health and quality of life improved throughout the post-treatment period. For the caregivers, their feelings of anxiety and depression improved throughout the follow-up period. Conclusions: Most of the results are consistent with previous studies. This study provides a knowledge foundation and research direction for future studies. More future studies with a larger subject number are highly encouraged to solidify the knowledge on psychosocial needs and to improve the care of the patients and caregivers.

CN68 Experiences and needs of rectal cancer survivors without or with minor low anterior resection syndrome

CN68 Experiences and needs of rectal cancer survivors without or with minor low anterior resection syndrome

Sexual dysfunction among early-onset colorectal cancer survivors: Sex-specific correlates of sexual health discussions between patients and providers

PurposeTo examine the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD), male erectile dysfunction (ED), and the prevalence and correlates of sexual health discussions between early-onset CRC survivors and their health care providers.MethodsAn online, cross-sectional survey was administered in partnership with a national CRC advocacy organization. Respondents (n = 234; diagnosed < 50 years, 6–36 months from diagnosis/relapse) were colon (36.8%) and rectal (63.3%) cancer survivors (62.5% male). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) was used to measure FSD, and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was used to measure ED. Survivors reported whether a doctor communicated with them about sexual issues during/after treatment.ResultsAmong females (n = 87), 81.6% had FSD (mean FSFI-6 score = 14.3 [SD±6.1]). Among males (n = 145), 94.5% had ED (mean IIEF-5 score = 13.6 [SD±3.4]). Overall, 59.4% of males and 45.4% of females reported a sexual health discussion. Among the total sample, older age of diagnosis and relapse were significantly associated with reporting a discussion, while female sex was negatively associated with reporting a sexual health discussion. Among males, older age at diagnosis and relapse, and among females, older age of diagnosis, were significantly associated with reporting a sexual health discussion.ConclusionThe prevalence of FSD and ED were high (8 in 10 females reporting FSD, almost all males reporting ED), while reported rates of sexual health discussion were suboptimal (half reported discussion). Interventions to increase CRC provider awareness of patients at risk for not being counseled are needed to optimize long-term health outcomes.

Radiation Therapy Changed the Second Malignancy Pattern in Rectal Cancer Survivors.

Background and Objectives: Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer patients. It can bring radio exposure together with the survival benefit. Cancer survivors are generally at an increased risk for second malignancies, and survivors receiving RT may have higher risks than survivors not receiving RT. Whether the risk of an all-site second malignancy may increase after RT is still debated. This study aims to compare the second malignancy pattern in rectal cancer survivors after RT. Materials and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used for analysis. In total, 49,961 rectal cancer patients (20-84 years of age) were identified between 2000 and 2012 from 18 SEER registries. All patients underwent surgery. The occurrence of second malignancies diagnosed after rectal cancer diagnosis was compared in patients who received and did not receive RT. The standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used. SEER*Stat was used to generate the 95% CIs for the SIR statistics using the exact method. Results: Of the total 49,961 patients, 5582 developed second malignancies. For all-site second primary malignancies, the age-adjusted SIRs were 1.14 (95% CI 1.1-1.18) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.96-1.04) in the no RT and RT groups, respectively. In 23,192 patients from the surgery-only group, 2604 had second malignancies, and in 26,769 patients who received RT, 2978 developed second malignancies. With respect to every site, the risk of secondary prostate cancer was significantly lower in the RT group (SIR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.33-0.46) than that in the surgery-only group (SIR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.12). Moreover, the risk of thyroid cancer was significantly higher in the RT group (SIR = 2.80, 95% CI 2.2-3.51) than that in the surgery-only group (SIR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.99-1.66). Conclusions: RT may change the second malignancy pattern in rectal cancer survivors; the risk of prostate cancer decreased, and the risk of thyroid cancer increased most significantly.

An online educational and supportive care application for rectal cancer survivors with low anterior resection syndrome: A mixed methods pilot study.

Restorative proctectomy is commonly associated with significant bowel dysfunction, known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), which has a negative impact on patients' quality of life. We developed an online patient-centred application on LARS (eLARS) for rectal cancer survivors. The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of eLARS for rectal cancer survivors with LARS following restorative proctectomy. The secondary objective was to explore participants' experiences with LARS and the eLARS application. This was a mixed methods study, which included a feasibility and qualitative analysis. Participants were rectal cancer survivors who underwent restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer within 3 years, completed all adjuvant treatment, and suffered from bowel dysfunction postoperatively. Participants were given access to the application over a 2-month study period. Feasibility was defined as 75% of study participants using the application ≥4 times per month. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants after the study period and were analysed using thematic analysis. Our sample included eight rectal cancer survivors, five women and three men. The median age was 58.5 years (56.5-64.5). Most participants (75%) were >1-year post-restorative proctectomy. 75% of study participants used the application ≥4 times per month for 2 months. Our thematic analysis revealed that participants felt that they lacked access to credible information and emotional support around the time of ileostomy closure, and found that eLARS addressed these challenges. eLARS is a feasible educational and supportive care intervention for patients with LARS and has the potential to improve patients' quality of life.

Impact of COVID-19 on Quality of Life in Long-Term Advanced Rectal Cancer Survivors.

Colorectal cancer remains one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers. Advanced rectal cancer patients receive neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy as well as surgery and suffer from reduced health-related quality of life due to various side effects. We were interested in the role of the COVID-19 pandemic and how it affected those patients' quality of life. A total of 489 advanced rectal cancer patients from the University Hospital Erlangen in Germany were surveyed between May 2010 and March 2022 and asked to fill out the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires over eight different time points: at the beginning, during and after radiochemotherapy, right before surgery, and in yearly intervals after surgery for up to four years. Answers were converted to scores to compare the COVID-19 period to the time before March 2020, focusing on the follow-ups, the developments over time-including by sex and age-and the influence of the TNM cT-stage. Overall, a trend of impaired functional and symptom scores was found across all surveys with few significances (body image -10.6 percentage points (pp) after one year; defecation problems +13.5 pp, insomnia +10.2 pp and weight loss +9.8 pp after three years; defecation problems +11.3 pp after four years). cT4-stage patients lost significantly more weight than their cT1-3-stage counterparts (+10.7 to 13.7 pp). Further studies should be conducted to find possible causes and develop countermeasures for future major infectious diseases.

Functional Results After Nerve-Sparing, Sphincter Preserving Rectal Cancer Surgery: Patient-Reported Outcomes of Sexual and Urinary Dysfunction.

There is an ongoing unmet need of early identification and discussion regarding the sexual and urinary dysfunction in the peri-operative period to improve the quality of life (QoL), particularly in young rectal cancer survivors. Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database was done. Male patients less than 60 years who underwent nerve preserving, sphincter sparing rectal cancer surgery between January 2013 and December 2019, were screened. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire was given to assess erectile dysfunction (ED). Patients were asked questions regarding their sexual and urinary function from the EORTC-QL CRC 38 questionnaire, and responses were recorded. Patients were also asked to report any retrograde ejaculation in post-operative period. Sixty-two patients were included in the study. Fifty-four patients (87.1%) received a diversion stoma. Sixteen patients (29.6%) felt stoma was interfering with their sexual function. Six patients (9.7%) reported retrograde ejaculation. Only 5 patients (8.06%) had moderate to severe ED, and the rest had none to mild ED. On univariate and multivariate analysis, only age predicted the development of clinically significant ED. Ten patients (16.1%) had significantly reduced sexual urges, and 23 patients (37.1%) had significant decrease in sexual satisfaction after surgery. Five patients (8.06%) reported having minor urinary complaints. No patient reported having major complaint pertaining to urinary health. While long-term urinary complaints are infrequent, almost half the patient suffered from erectile dysfunction in some form. There is a weak but significant association of age and ED. Follow-up clinic visits provide an ideal opportunity to counsel patients and provide any medical intervention, when necessary.

"I Wish There had been Resources": A Photo-Elicitation Study of Rectal Cancer Survivorship Care Needs.

Rectal cancer survivors experience unique, prolonged posttherapy symptoms. Previous data indicate that providers are not skilled at identifying the most pertinent rectal cancer survivorship issues. Consequently, survivorship care is incomplete with the majority of rectal cancer survivors reporting at least one unmet posttherapy need. This photo-elicitation study combines participant-submitted photographs and minimally structured qualitative interviews to explore one's lived experiences. Twenty rectal cancer survivors from a single tertiary canter provided photographs representative of their life after rectal cancer therapy. The iterative steps informed by inductive thematic analysis were used to analyze the transcribed interviews. Rectal cancer survivors had several recommendations to improve their survivorship care, which fell into three major themes: (1) informational needs (e.g., more details about posttherapy side effects); (2) continued multidisciplinary follow up care (e.g., dietary support); and (3) suggestions for support services (e.g., subsidized bowel altering medications and ostomy supplies). Rectal cancer survivors desired more detailed and individualized information, access to longitudinal multidisciplinary follow-up care, and resources to ease the burdens of daily life. These needs may be met through the restructuring of rectal cancer survivorship care to include disease surveillance, symptom management, and support services. As screening and therapy continues to improve, providers must continue to screen and to provide services that address the physical and psychosocial needs of rectal cancer survivors.