Elderly Rectal Cancer Patients Research Articles

Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in geriatric patients with rectal cancer.

The incidence of rectal cancer is increasing in the elderly population, yet the safety of surgical interventions in this group, particularly robotic surgery, is still debated. This study aims to investigate the safety and short-term postoperative outcomes of robotic surgery in geriatric patients (aged ≥ 70years) with rectal cancer. Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and undergoing robotic surgery between March 2021 and September 2023 were divided into two groups based on age: the elderly group (aged ≥ 70years) and the younger group (aged < 70years), totaling 108 patients. The study included 80 younger patients in group 1 and 28 elderly patients in group 2. The groups had similar gender distribution and tumor characteristics. The elderly group had higher ASA scores and lower albumin levels and underwent the Miles procedure more frequently. The stoma rate was higher in the elderly group. Operation duration, tumor diameter, lymph node dissection numbers, pathological stage, and other histopathological features were similar in the two groups. Postoperative outcomes like hospital stay, complication rates, anastomotic leakage, reoperation rates, unplanned readmissions, and mortality were comparable between the groups. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients is technically feasible and safe. Age should not be a determining factor in patient selection for robotic surgery or be considered a risk factor for postoperative complications.

1454: Treatment of rectal cancer in elderly patients >80 years might not be limited by their age

1454: Treatment of rectal cancer in elderly patients >80 years might not be limited by their age

Comparing short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients.

Da Vinci Robotics-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for rectal cancer is becoming more widely used. There is no strong evidence that robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery have similar outcomes in elderly patients with TME for rectal cancer. To determine the improved oncological outcomes and short-term efficacy of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients undergoing TME surgery. A retrospective study of the clinical pathology and follow-up of elderly patients who underwent TME surgery at the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology at the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine was conducted from March 2020 through September 2023. The patients were divided into a robot-assisted group (the R-TME group) and a laparoscopic group (the L-TME group), and the short-term efficacy of the two groups was compared. There were 45 elderly patients (≥ 60 years) in the R-TME group and 50 elderly patients (≥ 60 years) in the L-TME group. There were no differences in demographics, conversion rates, or postoperative complication rates. The L-TME group had a longer surgical time than the R-TME group [145 (125, 187.5) vs 180 (148.75, 206.25) min, P = 0.005), and the first postoperative meal time in the L-TME group was longer than that in the R-TME (4 vs 3 d, P = 0.048). Among the sex and body mass index (BMI) subgroups, the R-TME group had better outcomes than did the L-TME group in terms of operation time (P = 0.042) and intraoperative assessment of bleeding (P = 0.042). In the high BMI group, catheter removal occurred earlier in the R-TME group than in the L-TME group (3 vs 4 d, P = 0.001), and autonomous voiding function was restored. The curative effect and short-term efficacy of robot-assisted TME surgery for elderly patients with rectal cancer are similar to those of laparoscopic TME surgery; however, robotic-assisted surgery has better short-term outcomes for individuals with risk factors such as obesity and pelvic stenosis. Optimizing the learning curve can shorten the operation time, reduce the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, and improve the prognosis.

Factors associated with one-year mortality after curative surgery for primary clinical T4 and locally recurrent rectal cancer in elderly patients

IntroductionDespite advancements in colorectal cancer care, one-year post-operative mortality rates remain high for elderly patients who have undergone curative surgery for primary clinical T4 rectal cancer (cT4RC) or locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). This study aimed to identify factors associated with one-year mortality and to evaluate the causes of death. Materials & methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥70 years who underwent surgery with curative intent for cT4RC or LRRC between January 2013 and December 2020. Clinical and follow-up data were collected and analyzed to determine survival rates and investigate factors associated with mortality within one year after surgery. ResultsA total of 183 patients (94 cT4RC, 89 LRRC) were included. One-year mortality rates were 16.0% for cT4RC and 28.1% for LRRC (P = 0.064). In cT4RC patients, factors associated with one-year mortality were preoperative anemia (OR 3.83, P = 0.032), total pelvic exenteration (TPE) (OR 7.18, P = 0.018), multivisceral resections (OR 5.73, P = 0.028), pulmonary complications (OR 13.31, P < 0.001) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications (OR 5.19, P = 0.025). In LRRC patients, factors associated with one-year mortality were TPE (OR 27.00, P = 0.008), the need for supported care after discharge (OR 3.93, P = 0.041) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications (OR 3.95, P = 0.006). The main causes of death in cT4RC and LRRC patients were failure to recover (cT4RC 26.6%, LRRC 28.0%) and disease recurrence (cT4RC 26.6%, LRRC 60.0%). ConclusionIn order to tailor treatment in elderly with cT4RC and LRRC, factors associated with increased one-year mortality (e.g. pre-operative anemia, TPE) should be incorporated in the decision-making process. Clinical trial registrationNot applicable.

Analysis of the impact of radiotherapy and surgical treatment regimens based on the SEER database on the survival outcomes of rectal cancer patients over 70 years.

This study evaluates the impact of different combinations of treatment regimens, such as additional radiation, chemotherapy, and surgical treatments, on the survival of elderly rectal cancer patients ≥ 70 years of age to support physicians' clinical decision-making. Data from a sample of elderly rectal cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years diagnosed from 2005-2015 from the US surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database were retrospectively analyzed. The best cut-off point was selected using the x-tile software for the three continuity indices: age, tumor size, and number of regional lymph nodes. All patients were categorized into either the neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery group (R_S group), the surgical treatment group (S group), or the surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy group (S_R group). The propensity score allocation was used to match each included study subject in a 1:1 ratio, and the restricted mean survival time method (RMST) was used to predict the mean survival of rectal cancer patients within 5 and 10 years. The prognostic risk factors for rectal cancer patients were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and nomograms were constructed. A subgroup stratification analysis of patients with different treatment combination regimens was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used for between-group comparisons. The model's predictive accuracy was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, correction curves, and a clinical decision curve analysis (DCA). A total of 7556 cases of sample data from 2005 to 2015 were included, which were categorized into 6639 patients (87.86%) in the S group, 408 patients (5.4%) in the R_S group, and 509 patients (6.74%) in the S_R group, according to the relevant order of radiotherapy and surgery. After propensity score matching (PSM), the primary clinical characteristics of the groups were balanced and comparable. The difference in the mean survival time before and after PSM was not statistically significant in both R_S and S groups (P value > 0.05), and the difference in the mean survival time after PSM was statistically substantial in S_R and S groups (P value < 0.05). In the multifactorial Cox analysis, the M1 stage and Nodes ≥ 9 were independent risk factors. An age between 70-75 was an independent protective factor for patients with rectal cancer in the R_S and S groups. The Marital_status, T4 stage, N2 stage, M1 stage, and Nodes ≥ 9 were independent risk factors for patients with rectal cancer in the S_R and S groups, and an age between 70-81 was an independent protective factor. The ROC curve area, the model C index, and the survival calibration curve suggested good agreement between the actual and predicted values of the model. The DCA for 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival periods indicated that the model had some potential for application. The results of the study showed no significant difference in the overall survival (OS) between elderly patients who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery and those who received surgery alone; elderly patients who received surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy had some survival benefits compared with those who received surgery alone, though the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy was not significant. Therefore, radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients older than 70 years old should be based on individual differences in condition, and a precise treatment plan should be developed.

Real-world analysis of survival benefit of surgery and adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with CRC benefit from surgery and adjuvant therapy. A total of 90,347 eligible CRC patients older than 70 years were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and divided into a surgery group and a no-surgery group. After being matched by propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 23,930 patients were included in our analysis. The Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test were applied to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to confirm independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. In age-stratified analysis (70–74; 75–79; 80–84; ≥ 85), the OS and CSS rates of patients in the surgery group were significantly higher than those of patients in the no-surgery group (all P < 0.001). Adjuvant therapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS in elderly patients with CRC (all P < 0.001). Further analysis showed that elderly colon cancer patients with stage III and stage IV disease gained a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy can significantly improve OS and CSS in elderly rectal cancer patients with stage II, III, and IV disease. In conclusion, among CRC patients aged ≥ 70 years reported in the SEER database, treatment with surgical resection is significantly associated with improved OS and CSS. Moreover, adjuvant therapy led to a significant prognostic advantage for elderly advanced CRC patients who underwent surgery.

The clinical predictive value of geriatric nutritional risk index in elderly rectal cancer patients received surgical treatment after neoadjuvant therapy.

The assessment of nutritional status has been recognized as crucial in the treatment of geriatric cancer patients. The objective of this study is to determine the clinical predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in predicting the short-term and long-term prognosis of elderly rectal cancer (RC) patients who undergo surgical treatment after neoadjuvant therapy. Between January 2014 and December 2020, the clinical materials of 639 RC patients aged ≥70 years who underwent surgical treatment after neoadjuvant therapy were retrospectively analysed. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline potential confounders. Logistic regression analysis and competing risk analysis were conducted to evaluate the correlation between the GNRI and the risk of postoperative major complications and cumulative incidence of cancer-specific survival (CSS). Nomograms were then constructed for postoperative major complications and CSS. Additionally, 203 elderly RC patients were enrolled between January 2021 and December 2022 as an external validation cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that GNRI [odds ratio = 1.903, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.120-3.233, p = 0.017] was an independent risk factor for postoperative major complications. In competing risk analysis, the GNRI was also identified as an independent prognostic factor for CSS (subdistribution hazard ratio = 3.90, 95% CI: 2.46-6.19, p < 0.001). The postoperative major complication nomogram showed excellent performance internally and externally in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA). When compared with other models, the competing risk prognosis nomogram incorporating the GNRI achieved the highest outcomes in terms of the C-index, AUC, calibration plots, and DCA. The GNRI is a simple and effective tool for predicting the risk of postoperative major complications and the long-term prognosis of elderly RC patients who undergo surgical treatment after neoadjuvant therapy.

Robotic Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rectal cancer is estimated to increase due to an expanding aging population, thus affecting elderly patients more frequently. The optimal surgical treatment for this type of patient remains controversial because they are often excluded from or underrepresented in trials. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of robotic surgery in elderly patients (>70 years old) undergoing curative treatment for rectal cancer. Studies comparing elderly (E) and young (Y) patients submitted to robotic rectal resection were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data regarding surgical oncologic quality, post-operative, and survival outcomes were extracted. Overall, 322 patients underwent robotic resection (81 in the E group and 241 in the Y group) for rectal cancer. No differences between the two groups were found regarding distal margins and the number of nodes yielded (12.70 in the E group vs. 14.02 in the Y group, p = 0.16). No differences were found in conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. Survival outcomes were only reported in one study. The results of this study suggest that elderly patients can be submitted to robotic resection for rectal cancer with the same oncologic surgical quality offered to young patients, without increasing postoperative mortality and morbidity.

Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: Real-World Experience at a Tertiary Institution

Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: Real-World Experience at a Tertiary Institution

Advances in and Issues With Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

Colorectal cancer ranks third after breast cancer in terms of incidence and second after lung cancer in terms of mortality.Management of rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach, with the surgical management playing the main role. There are currently three resective techniques that complement the traditional open surgery: laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, and transanal total mesorectal excision.Rectal cancer in elderly patients is particularly hard to diagnose and treat surgically due to multiple comorbidities and limited functional reserve. Treatment of such patients may be associated with poorer outcomes after both open and minimally invasive surgery.This article reviews the current state of advances in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in general and in elderly patients in particular.

Toxicities and outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A scoping review.

91 Background: Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) followed by surgery has become the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This scoping review aims to assess the toxicity and outcomes of the currently available NAT of rectal cancer in elderly patients with age-associated frailty. Methods: Six thousand seventy-nine records were identified on Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane database, and CINAHL. Two independent reviewers screened the articles. Fifteen articles were identified through a hand search. Articles on NAT in LARC in elderly patients were included. Results: Thirty-three studies from 2005 to 2022 met inclusion criteria, including 27 retrospective reviews, 4 clinical trials (Phase 1 and 2) and 2 prospective studies; 5 were multicentred. The median age of the sample was 70-75 in 24 studies and 76-83 in 11 studies. One study examined only patients above 80. Twenty-four studies examined NAT with long course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), 5 examined both LCCRT and RT alone, 3 examined short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), one examined SCRT with sequential chemotherapy (CT), and one study examined neoadjuvant CT followed by LCCRT. Concurrent CT with 5 FU-based treatments was given in 23 studies with either intravenous or oral, and oxaliplatin was added to 5 FU in 10 studies. Interruption of concurrent treatment was reported with dose reduction, delay or discontinuation in 26 studies. Diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and radiation dermatitis were reported as significant side effects (G3 -4), with G3-4 diarrhea reported in 18 studies. Haematological toxicities were very frequent, with a 20-60% rate in the studies. No dose interruption of RT was required in the three studies that included only SCRT, except for one patient. The study on CT followed by LCCRT showed that CT was completed in 82% and LCCRT in 76% of patients. A preliminary result of PRODIGE 42-GERICO 12 NACRE, a randomised trial comparing SCRT with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), showed that 14% of patients in the CRT arm did not receive all of the planned treatment compared to 0% in SCRT arm, and the 6 months death rate was 10.0% in CRT arm and 3.92% in SCRT. Conclusions: Toxicities are frequently reported with Neoadjuvant LCCRT in the elderly and lead to treatment interruption. SCRT is well tolerated and probably associated with better survival (pending final results of the NACRE trial). Studies in this scoping review are over-represented by retrospective studies, and we suggest that future clinical trials focus on elderly patients to investigate treatment strategies with fewer toxicities.

Continuing Care Bundle in Elderly Patients with Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection with Permanent Stoma.

Objective A continuing care bundle can achieve a better outcome than a single implementation after discharge. This study aims to investigate the effect of this intervention in elderly patients with rectal cancer after radical resection with a permanent stoma. Methods Elderly patients diagnosed with rectal cancer underwent radical resection with permanent stoma, they were divided into the control group (n = 42) and bundle group (n = 42). The control group received the conventional care, and the bundle group received the continuing care bundle in addition to the conventional care. At 1- and 3-month after discharge, self-efficacy, self-care knowledge, ability to change stoma appliances, negative emotions, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were observed. Results The increased levels of self-efficacy, self-care knowledge, and ability to change stoma appliances were displayed in the bundle group after discharge as compared with that in the control group, along with the enhanced score of SF-36 subscales, including physical function (PF), role physical (RP), global health (GH) and vitality (V), social function (SF), and mental health (MH). Furthermore, patients showed alleviated depression and anxiety after the continuing care bundle as compared to those after conventional care. Besides, the bundle groups had higher patient satisfaction than the control group. Conclusions Continuing care bundle can serve as an effectiveness intervention in elderly rectal cancer patients after radical resection with permanent stoma via increasing self-efficacy and self-care knowledge, enhancing the ability to change stoma appliance, reliving the negative emotion, and improving quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for rectal cancer: technical note and first clinical experience on an organ-preserving approach

PurposeAs the population ages, the incidence of rectal cancer among elderly patients is rising. Due to the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality, alternative nonoperative treatment options have been explored in elderly and frail patients who are clinically inoperable or refuse surgery.MethodsHere we present technical considerations and first clinical experience after treating a cohort of six rectal cancer patients (T1‑3, N0‑1, M0; UICC stage I-IIIB) with definitive external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by image-guided, endorectal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Patients were treated with 10–13 × 3 Gy EBRT followed by HDR-BT delivering 12–18 Gy in two or three fractions. Tumor response was evaluated using endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis.ResultsMedian age was 84 years. All patients completed EBRT and HDR-BT without any high-grade toxicity (> grade 2). One patient experienced rectal bleeding (grade 2) after 10 weeks. Four patients (67%) demonstrated clinical complete response (cCR) or near cCR, there was one partial response, and one residual tumor and hepatic metastasis 8 weeks after HDR-BT. The median follow-up time for all six patients is 42 weeks (range 8–60 weeks). Sustained cCR without evidence of local regrowth has been achieved in all four patients with initial (n)cCR to date.ConclusionPrimary EBRT combined with HDR-BT is feasible and well tolerated with promising response rates in elderly and frail rectal cancer patients. The concept could be an integral part of a highly individualized and selective nonoperative treatment offered to patients who are not suitable for or refuse surgery.

Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Rectal Cancer Patients Following Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database in Sweden

Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Rectal Cancer Patients Following Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database in Sweden

Defecation disorder and anal function after surgery for lower rectal cancer in elderly patients.

AimThis study aims to investigate the association of patient age with defecation disorders and anal function after lower rectal cancer surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 141 consecutive patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent sphincter‐preserving operation. The patients were classified into five categories by age thresholds at 65, 70, 75, 80, and 85 years, for disaggregate analysis. Anal manometry was used for measuring the maximum resting pressure, high‐pressure zone, and maximum squeeze pressure. Anal manometry was performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome scores were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after rectal surgery or stoma closure for patients with ileostomy.ResultsThe data of 117 patients were reviewed. No significant differences were found between the younger and elderly groups in any characteristics across the six age groups. The preoperative intra‐anal pressures of the elderly patients were slightly lower than those of the younger patients; however, there was no significant difference in the course of postoperative intra‐anal pressures. Defecation disorder, as measured by the Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome scores, improved significantly in elderly patients compared to younger patients.ConclusionThere was no significant difference in the course of postoperative intra‐anal pressures between the elderly and younger patients. However, defecation disorders in elderly patients significantly improved compared with younger patients. Sphincter‐preserving operation can be a viable treatment option for active elderly patients.

Continuous negative pressure irrigation with double cannula through the anterior sacral space for treatment of anastomotic fistula after anus-preserving laparoscopic radical resection for ultra-low rectal cancer in elderly patients

Continuous negative pressure irrigation with double cannula through the anterior sacral space for treatment of anastomotic fistula after anus-preserving laparoscopic radical resection for ultra-low rectal cancer in elderly patients

P-180 Rectal cancer in the elderly: Characteristics, management and outcomes from a single centre retrospective cohort review

The incidence of rectal cancer is increased in the elderly. Advanced age may influence disease characteristics, disease course and management approach in such patients. Management strategies for such patients mirror those of younger patients with no clear-cut guidelines on approaching patients with more advanced age-associated frailty. This study aims to review patient demographics, disease characteristics and outcomes in rectal cancer in elderly patients and how this may help guide management approach going forward.

Oncologic and survival outcomes in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision.

The efficacy of the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer in elderly patients has not been established. A total of 3096 locally advanced rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, along with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, between January 2010 and December 2018, were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into elderly (>75years) and younger (≤75years) groups, and propensity score matching was used to balance a potentially confounding clinical bias. Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival and local recurrence-free survival rates for the two groups were compared. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for different clinicopathological variables were calculated to determine predictors of 3-year overall survival. Mean follow-up was 39.0 (range, 5-140) months. The overall 3-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival and locoregional relapse-free survival rates were 86.1, 87.6, 80.0, 82.4 and 95.4%, respectively. Only 3-year overall survival rates differed significantly between the elderly (77.2%) and younger (88.9%) groups (P=0.01). Cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival and locoregional relapse-free survival rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. Significant negative independent prognostic factors for 3-year overall survival were age>75years (HR=2.016, 95% CI 1.157-23.511, P=0.01) and high pathologic TNM stage (yp stage III, P<0.001). For elderly locally advanced rectal cancer patients who have good health and performance status, the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision can result in disease-related survival rates and oncological outcomes similar to those experienced by younger patients. The decision to use this treatment approach in elderly patients should not be based solely on chronological age.

Nomogram for Predicting Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients with Dysfunctional Stomata.

PurposeAnastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery in elderly patients is a critical challenge. Many risk factors have been found and many interventions tried, but anastomotic leakage in elderly patients remains difficult to deal with. This study aimed to create a nomogram for predicting anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery in elderly rectal cancer patients with dysfunctional stomata.MethodsWe collected data from 326 consecutive elderly patients with dysfunctional stomata after rectal cancer surgery at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University from January 2014 to December 2019. Risk factors of anastomotic leakage were identified with multivariate logistic regression and used to create a nomogram. Predictive performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, male sex, and neoadjuvant radiotherapy were identified as significantly associated factors that could be combined for accurate prediction of anastomotic leakage on multivariate logistic regression and development of a nomogram.The area under the ROC curve for this model was 0.645. The C-index value for this model was 0.645, indicating moderate predictive ability of the risk of anastomotic leakage.ConclusionThe nomogram showed good ability to predict anastomotic leakage in elderly patients with rectal cancer after surgery, and might be helpful in providing a reference point for selection of surgical procedures and perioperative treatment.

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for elderly rectal cancer patients in Japan: a nationwide study

BackgroundThis study aimed to analyse the perioperative results from a national dataset of rectal cancer resections in elderly patients.MethodsThe clinical records of patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between 2012 and 2014 were retrieved from the Japanese National Clinical Database and analysed retrospectively. Patients were categorized according to age and those 80 years or older were defined as elderly. Subgroups were also defined according to the surgical approach (laparoscopy versus open surgery). The short-term outcomes, including mortality, anastomotic leak, surgical site infections and medical complications were compared between subgroups.ResultsOf 56 175 patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery, some 6717 patients were elderly and laparoscopy was performed in 46.8 per cent of the sample. When comparing laparoscopy and open surgery in elderly patients, the operative mortality rate (1.5 versus 2.8 per cent; P < 0.001), the incidence of anastomotic leakage (5.2 versus 6.5 per cent; P = 0.026), surgical site infections (6.0 versus 8.0 per cent; P = 0.001), pneumonia (1.4 versus 2.5 per cent; P = 0.001), renal failure (0.7 versus 1.3 per cent; P = 0.016) and cardiac events (0.3 versus 0.8 per cent; P = 0.008) were lower for laparoscopy than for open surgery. The overall complication rate in elderly patients (19.5 per cent) was comparable to that in the younger group (P = 0.07). However, incidence of systemic complications was significantly higher in elderly than in younger patients (all P < 0.001).ConclusionLaparoscopy was safe and feasible in elderly patients compared with open surgery. However, the rates of systemic complications were significantly higher than in younger patients.