Recruitment Of General Transcription Factors Research Articles

Inhibition of the TRIM24 bromodomain reactivates latent HIV-1

Expression of the HIV-1 genome by RNA Polymerase II is regulated at multiple steps, as are most cellular genes, including recruitment of general transcription factors and control of transcriptional elongation from the core promoter. We recently discovered that tripartite motif protein TRIM24 is recruited to the HIV-1 Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) by interaction with TFII-I and causes transcriptional elongation by stimulating association of PTEF-b/ CDK9. Because TRIM24 is required for stimulation of transcription from the HIV-1 LTR, we were surprised to find that IACS-9571, a specific inhibitor of the TRIM24 C-terminal bromodomain, induces HIV-1 provirus expression in otherwise untreated cells. IACS-9571 reactivates HIV-1 in T cell lines bearing multiple different provirus models of HIV-1 latency. Additionally, treatment with this TRIM24 bromodomain inhibitor encourages productive HIV-1 expression in newly infected cells and inhibits formation of immediate latent transcriptionally repressed provirus. IACS-9571 synergizes with PMA, ionomycin, TNF-α and PEP005 to activate HIV-1 expression. Furthermore, co-treatment of CD4 + T cells from individuals with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with PEP005 and IACS-9571 caused robust provirus expression. Notably, IACS-9571 did not cause global activation of T cells; rather, it inhibited induction of IL2 and CD69 expression in human PBMCs and Jurkat T cells treated with PEP005 or PMA. These observations indicate the TRIM24 bromodomain inhibitor IACS-9571 represents a novel HIV-1 latency reversing agent (LRA), and unlike other compounds with this activity, causes partial suppression of T cell activation while inducing expression of latent provirus.

Dynamics of RNA polymerase II and elongation factor Spt4/5 recruitment during activator-dependent transcription

In eukaryotes, RNA polymerase II (RNApII) transcribes messenger RNA from template DNA. Decades of experiments have identified the proteins needed for transcription activation, initiation complex assembly, and productive elongation. However, the dynamics of recruitment of these proteins to transcription complexes, and of the transitions between these steps, are poorly understood. We used multiwavelength single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to directly image and quantitate these dynamics in a budding yeast nuclear extract that reconstitutes activator-dependent transcription in vitro. A strong activator (Gal4-VP16) greatly stimulated reversible binding of individual RNApII molecules to template DNA. Binding of labeled elongation factor Spt4/5 to DNA typically followed RNApII binding, was NTP dependent, and was correlated with association of mRNA binding protein Hek2, demonstrating specificity of Spt4/5 binding to elongation complexes. Quantitative kinetic modeling shows that only a fraction of RNApII binding events are productive and implies a rate-limiting step, probably associated with recruitment of general transcription factors, needed to assemble a transcription-competent preinitiation complex at the promoter. Spt4/5 association with transcription complexes was slowly reversible, with DNA-bound RNApII molecules sometimes binding and releasing Spt4/5 multiple times. The average Spt4/5 residence time was of similar magnitude to the time required to transcribe an average length yeast gene. These dynamics suggest that a single Spt4/5 molecule remains associated during a typical transcription event, yet can dissociate from RNApII to allow disassembly of abnormally long-lived (i.e., stalled) elongation complexes.

Dynamic regulation of promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II pausing

Transcriptional pausing is a widely used regulatory mechanism to control precise gene expression from bacteria to humans. In metazoans, transcription initiation requires the recruitment of general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to gene promoters. After it initiates transcription and synthesizes a short RNA, Pol II pauses at the promoter-proximal region, standing by for further cues to enter the productive elongation stage. Promoter-proximal Pol II pausing is one of the rate-limiting steps during transcription, functioning as an early transcriptional elongation check point, to ensure the correct modification of transcription machinery and the addition of the 7-methylguanosine cap to nascent transcripts. Pol II pausing at promoter-proximal region is stabilized by the negative elongation factor (NELF) and the 5,6-dichloro-1-β-d-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) sensitivity-inducing factor (DSIF). In response to developmental signals or environmental stress, the release of paused Pol II can be triggered by the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb), which is composed of the kinase CDK9 and its regulatory subunit CCNT1/2. The kinase activity of P-TEFb towards Pol II carboxy-terminal domain (CTD), NELF and DSIF is critical for P-TEFb to execute its function in pause release, and is thus tightly controlled. To date, it has been identified that P-TEFb mainly exists in three different complexes: the super elongation complex (SEC), BRD4-P-TEFb, and the inactive 7SK snRNP-P-TEFb complex. SEC, one of the most active P-TEFb containing complexes, is required for rapid gene expression in response to stress or developmental signals. The active and inactive forms of P-TEFb complexes co-exist in vivo , reaching equilibrium to meet the transcriptional needs of cells. The transition of Pol II from pause to productive elongation stage is achieved by dynamic exchange between the pausing factors and the positive elongation factors at the proximal promoter region. Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in living cells is a physicochemical process that confines biochemical reactions within membrane-less compartments. Low complexity intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) within proteins can initiate and promote phase separation and formation of liquid droplets, which in turn facilitate the multivalent weak interactions among these IDR-containing proteins. Recent studies using super-resolution live cell imaging technology have revealed that RNA Pol II can form dynamic foci in cells through LLPS and transitions between different phases, which are likely mediated by phosphorylated CTD. Moreover, factors involved in various transcription steps can rapidly and dynamically concentrate and exchange at the hot regulatory genomic loci. For example, SEC components are able to compartmentalize and concentrate P-TEFb from its inactive partners. Upon serum stimulation, SEC assembles promptly into phase-separated droplets at the immediate early genes (IEG), triggering rapid transcription induction. Mutations in transcription regulators can lead to developmental defects and many human diseases, including cancers. For instance, abnormal stabilization of SEC components via MLL fusion plays a contributing role in leukemogenesis. Fusion of the SEC core component ENL with MLL can greatly enhance phase separation of SEC, through which the leukemic genes might be mis-activated. In addition, there is growing evidence that disease related mutations in transcriptional regulators can cause malfunction through aberrant condensation, providing potential targets for designing therapeutic strategies through phase separation interventions.

HOXC6 Is Transcriptionally Regulated via Coordination of MLL Histone Methylase and Estrogen Receptor in an Estrogen Environment

Homeobox (HOX)-containing gene HOXC6 is a critical player in mammary gland development and milk production, and is overexpressed in breast and prostate cancers. We demonstrated that HOXC6 is transcriptionally regulated by estrogen (E2). HOXC6 promoter contains two putative estrogen response elements (EREs), termed as ERE1 1/2 and ERE2 1/2. Promoter analysis using luciferase-based reporter assay demonstrated that both EREs are responsive to E2, with ERE1 1/2 being more responsive than ERE2 1/2. Estrogen receptors (ERs) ERα and ERβ bind to these EREs in an E2-dependent manner, and antisense-mediated knockdown of ERs suppressed the E2-dependent activation of HOXC6 expression. Similarly, knockdown of histone methylases MLL2 and MLL3 decreased the E2-mediated activation of HOXC6. However, depletion of MLL1 or MLL4 showed no significant effect. MLL2 and MLL3 were bound to the HOXC6 EREs in an E2-dependent manner. In contrast, MLL1 and MLL4 that were bound to the HOXC6 promoter in the absence of E2 decreased upon exposure to E2. MLL2 and MLL3 play key roles in histone H3 lysine-4 trimethylation and in the recruitment of general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II in the HOXC6 promoter during E2-dependent transactivation. Nuclear receptor corepressors N-CoR and SAFB1 were bound in the HOXC6 promoter in the absence of E2, and that binding was decreased upon E2 treatment, indicating their critical roles in suppressing HOXC6 gene expression under nonactivated conditions. Knockdown of either ERα or ERβ abolished E2-dependent recruitment of MLL2 and MLL3 into the HOXC6 promoter, demonstrating key roles of ERs in the recruitment of these mixed lineage leukemias into the HOXC6 promoter. Overall, our studies demonstrated that HOXC6 is an E2-responsive gene, and that histone methylases MLL2 and MLL3, in coordination with ERα and ERβ, transcriptionally regulate HOXC6 in an E2-dependent manner.

The Histone Modifications Governing TFF1 Transcription Mediated by Estrogen Receptor

Transcription regulation by histone modifications is a major contributing factor to the structural and functional diversity in biology. These modifications are encrypted as histone codes or histone languages and function to establish and maintain heritable epigenetic codes that define the identity and the fate of the cell. Despite recent advances revealing numerous histone modifications associated with transcription regulation, how such modifications dictate the process of transcription is not fully understood. Here we describe spatial and temporal analyses of the histone modifications that are introduced during estrogen receptor α (ERα)-activated transcription. We demonstrated that aborting RNA polymerase II caused a disruption of the histone modifications that are associated with transcription elongation but had a minimal effect on modifications deposited during transcription initiation. We also found that the histone H3S10 phosphorylation mark is catalyzed by mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1 (MSK1) and is recognized by a 14-3-3ζ/14-3-3ε heterodimer through its interaction with H3K4 trimethyltransferase SMYD3 and the p52 subunit of TFIIH. We showed that H3S10 phosphorylation is a prerequisite for H3K4 trimethylation. In addition, we demonstrated that SET8/PR-Set7/KMT5A is required for ERα-regulated transcription and its catalyzed H4K20 monomethylation is implicated in both transcription initiation and elongation. Our experiments provide a relatively comprehensive analysis of histone modifications associated with ERα-regulated transcription and define the biological meaning of several key components of the histone code that governs ERα-regulated transcription.

TFIIA and the transactivator Rap1 cooperate to commit TFIID for transcription initiation

Transcription of eukaryotic mRNA encoding genes by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is triggered by the binding of transactivating proteins to enhancer DNA, which stimulates the recruitment of general transcription factors (GTFs; TFIIA, B, D, E, F, H) and Pol II on the cis-linked promoter leading to preinitiation complex (PIC) formation and transcription1. In TFIID-dependent activation pathways, this TATA box Binding Protein (TBP)-containing GTF is first recruited on the promoter through interaction with activators1-3 and cooperates with TFIIA to form a committed PIC4. However, neither the mechanisms by which activation signals are communicated between these factors, nor the structural organization of the activated PIC are known. Here we used cryo-electron microscopy to determine the architecture of nucleoprotein complexes composed of TFIID, TFIIA, the transcriptional activator Rap1 and yeast enhancer-promoter DNA. These structures revealed the mode of binding of Rap1 and TFIIA to TFIID, as well as a reorganization of TFIIA induced by its interaction with Rap1. We propose that this change in position increases the exposure of TBP within TFIID, consequently enhancing its ability to interact with the promoter. A large Rap1-dependent DNA loop forms between the activator binding site and the proximal promoter region, and this loop is topologically locked by a TFIIA-Rap1 protein bridge that folds over the DNA. These results highlight the role of TFIIA in transcriptional activation, define a molecular mechanism for enhancer-promoter communication and provide important new structural insights into the pathways of intramolecular communication that convey transcription activation signals through the TFIID complex.

The Increase in the Number of Subunits in Eukaryotic RNA Polymerase III Relative to RNA Polymerase II Is due to the Permanent Recruitment of General Transcription Factors

The number of subunits of RNA polymerases (RNAPs) increases during evolution from 5 in eubacteria to 12 in archaea. In eukaryotes, which have at least three RNAPs, the number of subunits has expanded from 12 in RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) to 14 in RNA polymerase I (RNAPI) and to 17 in RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII). It was recently demonstrated that the two additional subunits found in RNAPI relative to RNAPII are homologous to TFIIF, a dimeric general transcription factor of RNAPII. Here, we extend this finding by demonstrating that four of the five RNAPIII-specific subunits are also homologous to transcription factors of RNAPII. We use the available evidence to propose an evolutionary history of the eukaryotic RNAPs and argue that the increases in the number of subunits that occurred in RNAPs I and III are due to the permanent recruitment of preexisting transcription factors.

In new company: U1 snRNA associates with TAF15

In new company: U1 snRNA associates with TAF15

Transcriptional induction of the human asparagine synthetase gene during the unfolded protein response does not require the ATF6 and IRE1/XBP1 arms of the pathway

The UPR (unfolded protein response) pathway comprises three signalling cascades mediated by the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress-sensor proteins PERK [PKR (double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase)-like ER kinase], IRE1 (inositol-requiring kinase 1) and ATF6 (activating transcription factor 6). The present study shows that ASNS (asparagine synthetase) transcription activity was up-regulated in HepG2 cells treated with the UPR activators thapsigargin and tunicamycin. ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation) analysis demonstrated that during ER stress, ATF4, ATF3 and C/EBPbeta (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta) bind to the ASNS proximal promoter region that includes the genomic sequences NSRE (nutrient-sensing response element)-1 and NSRE-2, previously implicated by mutagenesis in UPR activation. Consistent with increased ASNS transcription, ChIP analysis also demonstrated that UPR signalling resulted in enhanced recruitment of general transcription factors, including RNA Pol II (polymerase II), to the ASNS promoter. The ASNS gene is also activated by the AAR (amino acid response) pathway following amino acid deprivation of tissue or cells. Immunoblot analysis of HepG2 cells demonstrated that simultaneous activation of the AAR and UPR pathways did not further increase the ASNS or ATF4 protein abundance when compared with triggering either pathway alone. In addition, siRNA (small interfering RNA)-mediated knockdown of XBP1 (X-box-binding protein 1), ATF6alpha or ATF6beta expression did not affect ASNS transcription, whereas siRNA against ATF4 suppressed ASNS transcription during UPR activation. Collectively, these results indicate that the PERK/p-eIF2alpha (phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha)/ATF4 signalling cascade is the only arm of the UPR that is responsible for ASNS transcriptional induction during ER stress. Consequently, ASNS NSRE-1 and NSRE-2, in addition to ERSE (ER stress response element)-I, ERSE-II and the mUPRE (mammalian UPR element), function as mammalian ER-stress-responsive sequences.

CBF/NF‐Y controls endoplasmic reticulum stress induced transcription through recruitment of both ATF6(N) and TBP

Previously the analysis of promoters regulated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress identified a composite promoter element, ERSE that interacts with both CBF/NF-Y (CBF) and ATF6(N) transcription factors. This prompted us to investigate the underlying mechanism by which CBF, a ubiquitously binding transcription factor, specifically controls transcription activation during ER stress. The in vitro DNA binding study performed using purified recombinant proteins revealed that CBF specifically recruits ATF6(N) to ERSE DNA but it does not interact with ATF6(N) in absence of DNA binding. Inhibition of CBF binding resulted in a significant reduction of optimal transcription activation of cellular genes during ER stress. Analysis of cellular promoters by ChIP demonstrated that CBF is needed for recruitment of both ATF6(N) and TBP but not for either acetylation of histone H3-K9 or trimethylation of histone H3-K4 during ER stress. Together these study results reveal that CBF controls ER stress-inducible transcription through recruitment of both ATF6(N) and TBP but not through chromatin modifications. Our observations are in agreement with the results of recently published studies that have shown that CBF controls transcription of varieties of inducible promoters through recruitment of general transcription factors but not through acetylation of histone H4. These findings provide a paradigm of the function of CBF in inducible transcription.

Long-range chromosomal interactions regulate the timing of the transition between poised and active gene expression

To understand how mammalian genes are regulated from their natural chromosomal environment, we have analysed the molecular events occurring throughout a 150 kb chromatin segment containing the alpha globin gene locus as it changes from a poised, silent state in erythroid progenitors, to the fully activated state in late, erythroid cells. Active transcription requires the late recruitment of general transcription factors, mediator and Pol II not only to the promoter but also to its remote regulatory elements. Natural mutants of the alpha cluster show that whereas recruitment of the pre-initiation complex to the upstream elements occurs independently, recruitment to the promoter is largely dependent on the regulatory elements. An improved, quantitative chromosome conformation capture analysis demonstrates that this recruitment is associated with a conformational change, in vivo, apposing the promoter with its remote regulators, consistent with a chromosome looping mechanism. These findings point to a general mechanism by which a gene can be held in a poised state until the appropriate stage for expression, coordinating the level and timing of gene expression during terminal differentiation.

Yng1 PHD Finger Binding to H3 Trimethylated at K4 Promotes NuA3 HAT Activity at K14 of H3 and Transcription at a Subset of Targeted ORFs

Posttranslational histone modifications participate in modulating the structure and function of chromatin. Promoters of transcribed genes are enriched with K4 trimethylation and hyperacetylation on the N-terminal tail of histone H3. Recently, PHD finger proteins, like Yng1 in the NuA3 HAT complex, were shown to interact with H3K4me3, indicating a biochemical link between K4 methylation and hyperacetylation. By using a combination of mass spectrometry, biochemistry, and NMR, we detail the Yng1 PHD-H3K4me3 interaction and the importance of NuA3-dependent acetylation at K14. Furthermore, genome-wide ChIP-Chip analysis demonstrates colocalization of Yng1 and H3K4me3 in vivo. Disrupting the K4me3 binding of Yng1 altered K14ac and transcription at certain genes, thereby demonstrating direct in vivo evidence of sequential trimethyl binding, acetyltransferase activity, and gene regulation by NuA3. Our data support a general mechanism of transcriptional control through which histone acetylation upstream of gene activation is promoted partially through availability of H3K4me3, "read" by binding modules in select subunits.

Formation of an Active Tissue-Specific Chromatin Domain Initiated by Epigenetic Marking at the Embryonic Stem Cell Stage

The differentiation potential of stem cells is determined by the ability of these cells to establish and maintain developmentally regulated gene expression programs that are specific to different lineages. Although transcriptionally potentiated epigenetic states of genes have been described for haematopoietic progenitors, the developmental stage at which the formation of lineage-specific gene expression domains is initiated remains unclear. In this study, we show that an intergenic cis-acting element in the mouse lambda5-VpreB1 locus is marked by histone H3 acetylation and histone H3 lysine 4 methylation at a discrete site in embryonic stem (ES) cells. The epigenetic modifications spread from this site toward the VpreB1 and lambda5 genes at later stages of B-cell development, and a large, active chromatin domain is established in pre-B cells when the genes are fully expressed. In early B-cell progenitors, the binding of haematopoietic factor PU.1 coincides with the expansion of the marked region, and the region becomes a center for the recruitment of general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II. In pre-B cells, E2A also binds to the locus, and general transcription factors are distributed across the active domain, including the gene promoters and the intergenic region. These results suggest that localized epigenetic marking is important for establishing the transcriptional competence of the lambda5 and VpreB1 genes as early as the pluripotent ES cell stage.

The Co-activator CREB-binding Protein Participates in Enhancer-dependent Activities of Bicoid

Bicoid (Bcd) is a transcriptional activator required for early embryonic patterning in Drosophila. Despite extensive studies, it currently remains unclear how Bcd activates transcription and what proteins participate in its activation process. In this report, we describe experiments to analyze the role of the Drosophila co-activator dCBP in Bcd-mediated activation. In Drosophila S2 cells, the Bcd activity is increased by the co-transfection of plasmids expressing dCBP and reduced by double-stranded RNA-mediated interference against dCBP. We further show that Bcd and dCBP can interact with each other and that Bcd-interacting domains of dCBP can cause dominant negative effects on Bcd activity in S2 cells. Our comparison of two Bcd-responsive enhancers, hunchback (hb) and knirps (kni), reveals a differential role of dCBP in facilitating Bcd activation. A dCBP mutant defective in its histone acetyltransferase activity exhibits a reduced, but not abolished, co-activator function for Bcd. Our chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that dCBP can increase not only the occupancy of Bcd itself at the enhancers but also the recruitment of general transcription factors to the promoter. Together, these experiments suggest that dCBP is an enhancer-dependent co-activator of Bcd, facilitating its activation through multiple mechanisms.

CBF/NF-Y functions both in nucleosomal disruption and transcription activation of the chromatin-assembled topoisomerase IIalpha promoter. Transcription activation by CBF/NF-Y in chromatin is dependent on the promoter structure.

To understand the role of CCAAT-binding factor (CBF) in transcription in the context of chromatin-assembled DNA, we used regularly spaced nucleosomal DNA using topoisomerase IIalpha (topo IIalpha) and alpha2(1) collagen promoter templates, which were subsequently reconstituted in an in vitro transcription reaction. Binding of CBF to the nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter containing four CBF-binding sites disrupted the regular nucleosomal structure not only in the promoter region containing the CBF-binding sites but also in the downstream region over the transcription start site. In contrast, no nucleosome disruption was observed in a mutant topo IIalpha promoter containing mutations in all CBF-binding sites. Interestingly, CBF also activated transcription from nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter. In this experiment, a promoter containing one wild-type CBF-binding site was activated very weakly, whereas the promoter containing mutations in all sites was not activated by CBF. A truncated CBF that lacked the glutamine-rich domains did not activate transcription from nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter but disrupted the nucleosomal structure about as much as did the binding of full-length CBF. Two nucleosomal mouse alpha2(1) collagen promoter DNAs, one containing a single and the other containing four CBF- binding sites, were also reconstituted in an in vitro transcription reaction. None of the nucleosomal collagen promoters was activated by CBF. However, both of these collagen promoters were activated by CBF when the transcription reaction was performed using naked DNA templates. Binding of CBF to the nucleosomal collagen promoter containing four binding sites disrupted the nucleosomal structure, similarly as observed in the topo IIalpha promoter. Altogether this study indicates that CBF-mediated nucleosomal disruption occurred independently of transcription activation. It also suggests that specific promoter structure may play a role in the CBF-mediated transcription activation of nucleosomal topo IIalpha promoter template.